HTC One & S4 3D Mark.
Benchmarks done by DiP7 All credit and thanks to him for running them and sharing the benchmarks with us.
Link to his original post: http://www.max-up.ru/news-apple/3dmark-sgs4-exynos-vs-htc-one.html
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Funny
So to summarise:
HTC One Ice Storm: 11309
S4 Storm: 9552
HTC One Ice Storm: 6190
S4 Storm Extreme: 6127
A small victory, but seems to be a lot of leeway between these results, just ran this on my own One and got 10029 and 6626 results respectively, so alot lower then alot higher.
whatever it is this means the 554MP3 is not running at 533mhz due to power / thermals
please also means its not what is hyped to be and Adreno 320 is not to be taken lightly
Would love to see the test run again once the One is updated to 4.2.2 - these results have nowhere to go but up.
catachresistant said:
Would love to see the test run again once the One is updated to 4.2.2 - these results have nowhere to go but up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, I'm sure it will get a nice performance bump from that.
I´m so looking forward to the 4.2.2 update. Not cause of the Android Version, but the drivers. Its fast at the moment, but it should be even faster with them.
shox22 said:
I´m so looking forward to the 4.2.2 update. Not cause of the Android Version, but the drivers. Its fast at the moment, but it should be even faster with them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I expect the benchmarks to improve with 4.2 by a decent amount, maybe we'll see around 41 fps Egypt offscreen.
As usual, 3DMarks of any kind cannot be a standard test of anything of value.
I've got these scores from my Nexus 4 running stock 4.2.2. (Left is default and right is extreme)
Benchmarks like this are totally pointless for measuring performance. They might be fun, but they are so variable (even on the same device) that they are useless. They also have biases towards certain GPUs that do no reflect real world gaming.
All this test proves is that with current software 3Dmark for android runs better on the Adreno in the One than on the PowerVR in the S4, nothing else whatsoever. Since its not a game, who cares?
3DMark is really wierd. I ran it yestarday several times and the score varied from 9900 to 10800. The highest score I got was just after the restart of the device. 10800 in IceStorm and 6690 in Extreme. Still... it looks like the "The One" is on par with SIV when it comes to performance. Now its up HTC to make the software better. I mean its still far better than Samsung when it comes to bug count and stability but the camera, Zoe, Blinkfeed functionality should be extended. Come on HTC. You can do it...
-]Megacharge[- said:
HTC One & S4 3D Mark.
Benchmarks done by DiP7 All credit and thanks to him for running them and sharing the benchmarks with us.
Link to his original post: http://www.max-up.ru/news-apple/3dmark-sgs4-exynos-vs-htc-one.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Were exactly did you get an S4 octa and an HTC one to perform these test. These are the two rarest phones on the planet especially the S4 octa. Won't consider this final since the S4 octa is still in production. <<<<<you can Google that
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
we see both of devices arent ready to give noteworthy full hd game performance with these gpu..i think we will have to wait better gpu.
strip419 said:
Were exactly did you get an S4 octa and an HTC one to perform these test. These are the two rarest phones on the planet especially the S4 octa. Won't consider this final since the S4 octa is still in production
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-]Megacharge[- said:
HTC One & S4 3D Mark.
---> Benchmarks done by DiP7 All credit and thanks to him for running them and sharing the benchmarks with us.<---
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RCFTW.
A reviewer from a Russian reviewer site who is also a member of our forums here. You shouldn't consider it final, the HTC One's performance will increase, once it's running 4.2.
strip419 said:
Were exactly did you get an S4 octa and an HTC one to perform these test. These are the two rarest phones on the planet especially the S4 octa. Won't consider this final since the S4 octa is still in production. <<<<<you can Google that
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm.... Not a surprise at all. A lot of people have the ONE....just go look at the Development section.
As for the S4 Exynos Octa....wouldn't shock me at all that someone has it in their hands.
-]Megacharge[- said:
RCFTW.
A reviewer from a Russian reviewer site who is also a member of our forums here. You shouldn't consider it final, the HTC One's performance will increase, once it's running 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude we have seen phone performance decrease after SW updates.
Stop making it look as if it is guaranteed
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
strip419 said:
Dude we have seen phone performance decrease after SW updates.
Stop making it look as if it is guaranteed
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol Stop trolling, kid.
-]Megacharge[- said:
lol Stop trolling, kid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 you really think they'd release an update that slows things down? Lol... You know cuz sometimes after I get a tune up on my car it gets bogged down
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
lopri said:
As usual, 3DMarks of any kind cannot be a standard test of anything of value.
I've got these scores from my Nexus 4 running stock 4.2.2. (Left is default and right is extreme)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It scores higher because the screen resolution is lower and 3DMark renders onscreen.
It's still an awesome phone though.
3DMark Benchmark video
Related
Hey guys,
I've been doing these benchmarks alot on WinMo before I got my first Android device. I always felt Winmo was sluggish, but look at this:
GLBenchmark link
I compared the Nexus with a Milestone, HD2 and 3GS. And it shocked me... The HD2 is faster at most benchmarks!
Is that because of the SDK with OpenGL ES 2.0 isn't used yet?
Hoping this could be improved, because I left Winmo because of this.
I don't believe this benchmark.
Okay, you're comparing several different platforms here. The HD2 and the Nexus One have the exact same GPU.
More accurate: this particular benchmark is faster on its Windows Mobile port than on its Android port.
scoring 100% in a benchmark can not be right?
frleus said:
scoring 100% in a benchmark can not be right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally speaking in these types of benchmarks, the benchmark is set by the highest-scoring device. 100% would be the king for that specific test.
You would be correct, Android 2.1 as it is on our phones doesn't have all of the graphics boosters. To bo honest, it isn't that surprising IMHO, since these benchmarks are hugely influenced by the software itself, otherwise ROM cooking wouldn't do anything for increasing these #'s.
Maybe you could re-run this with a Cyan ROM, which has lots of those little things added in, such as the Arm Neon graphics inhancing(or whatever the heck its exact name is).
Also, keep in mind, that there are more important factors than "benchmarks".
pjcforpres said:
You would be correct, Android 2.1 as it is on our phones doesn't have all of the graphics boosters. To bo honest, it isn't that surprising IMHO, since these benchmarks are hugely influenced by the software itself, otherwise ROM cooking wouldn't do anything for increasing these #'s.
Maybe you could re-run this with a Cyan ROM, which has lots of those little things added in, such as the Arm Neon graphics inhancing(or whatever the heck its exact name is).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, with this, but adding one more thing instead of just testing different phones, test these benchmarks on cyan and emnother. With the nexus our graphics performance is aided by software so hardware isnt going to be the kicker between the hd2 and the nexus.
CM 5.0.6
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Web based benchmarks are as fail as the DPI on the HD2.
TheDudeOfLife said:
Web based benchmarks are as fail as the DPI on the HD2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In your experience which would be a good benchmark besides Linpack?
jlevy73 said:
In your experience which would be a good benchmark besides Linpack?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Water submersion test.
TheDudeOfLife said:
Water submersion test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ Drop Height.
uberingram said:
+ Drop Height.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Submersion test + drop height = the angle of the dangle
I agree that static benchmarks aren't anything, but the Nexus should be at least able to score comparable to the HD2, right? Hardware is the same, it's just the software that differs... alot.
NeoS2007 said:
I agree that static benchmarks aren't anything, but the Nexus should be at least able to score comparable to the HD2, right? Hardware is the same, it's just the software that differs... alot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah the quest for improving graphics on msm7k errr i mean snapdragon processors begin. Nice to see you've jumped to Android neoS2007
i think theres heaps of room for n1 to improve and count me if you decide on creating a group for improving graphics on the n1
babijoee said:
ah the quest for improving graphics on msm7k errr i mean snapdragon processors begin. Nice to see you've jumped to Android neoS2007
i think theres heaps of room for n1 to improve and count me if you decide on creating a group for improving graphics on the n1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to see you here too babijoee. I'm trying to get someone on the MSM bandwagon to coordinate it, but Snapdragon is just so much more interesting... Anyways, goodtimes.
Anyways, I'm not setting up a group until i'm fairly certain the N1 CAN get better. I want to compare the N1 with the Desire and then again when OGLES 2.0 is fully implemented.
Nothing official but defiantly interesting:
http://www.androidspin.com/2010/04/21/google-getting-ready-to-dish-out-some-froyo/
I'm sure if everything mentioned here would defiantly give the n1 a substantial performance increase
Definitely worth waiting for. I'll see if I can track improvements in the graphics area of the N1 once Froyo is out.
NeoS2007 said:
Good to see you here too babijoee. I'm trying to get someone on the MSM bandwagon to coordinate it, but Snapdragon is just so much more interesting... Anyways, goodtimes.
Anyways, I'm not setting up a group until i'm fairly certain the N1 CAN get better. I want to compare the N1 with the Desire and then again when OGLES 2.0 is fully implemented.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just ran it on my Desire. The upload failed so i dont have exact figures to prove anything, but it looks much the same as the N1 listed on their site. Most things are within 5%. My HD2 running a dutty custom ROM and Chainfires driver hack is a bit faster.
Raging Thunder 2 run extremly fast on N1, faster than moto chaser on ipod touch 2g. Anyway mobile benchmarks are always bulls**t
This might not be the right fourm but could someone please tell me why HTC phones are twice as fast than the Epic on linpack? I've tried a EVO and a Droid Incredible, both get a score of 32.500! Why?
Because JIT is optimized for Snapdragon processors, you see more performance boosts with those phones. However, mere benchmarks do not translate to real world performance whatsoever. My Epic is faster than any phone that's out there. Never go by benchmarks, lot of them are as useless as the Windows Experience Index crap. Our phones have the better hardware, when official Froyo is out and devs get the source, you'll see how powerful it really is.
Because linpack performance does not equal real life performance.... I also recall reading that linpack has not been optimized for the epic's processor. However, try 30 seconds using an evo and compare it to the epic and you'll have your actual answer
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I think they are a 128 bit system versus 64 bit. But all I hear from evo user is the epic is faster
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
nimaim said:
Because JMy Epic is faster than any phone that's out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just like cars, there's always someone faster...I think it is pure ignorance to state you alone have the fastest phone in the whole world. *shrug* For me my user experience is awesome and i know firsthand that benchmarks don't tell the whole story and can be faked. With tmpfs and a little knowhow anyone can 3000+ on quadrant.
Sent on the go from my mobile device
I didn't mean to come across as arrogant. I didn't mean I alone have the fastest phone in the world at all. I meant with everything that's out in terms of OC'd kernels, Epic owners in general have faster phones than practically any other out there (currently). Benchmarks are not high, but that does not translate to real world performance which is what I was getting at.
Essentially what has been said before: Linpack has been compiled and optimized for the other processor. Someone has to write code for each specific processor in order for it to take advantage of each one's architecture. Back when Intel's Nahalem chips came out, similar results were observed (I used to build HPC clusters).
Try nenamark1. The epic smokes the evo in that test
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Simple, linpack is a test checking for raw CPU power via floating points..Snapdragon has a thing called a VFP which is a Floating Point Accelerator...
Aka instead of checking raw CPU power of the CPU..your checking how fast the the VFP processes floating points lol..
To give an example, its like one person actually taking a test, while the other is copying off an answer sheet..who will be the fastest?
If you go by benchmarks that have not had their code optimized for the Snapdragon, where it is more apples to apples (it will never be completely apples to apples), the Hummingbirds generally come out on top.
Plus, if you look at gaming, the FPS on the Hummingbird is much faster. Of course, CPU and graphics benchmarks are quite different.
It has a keyboard
Thread moved to General.
I'm pretty new to android phones but I did my homework before i decided on my epic. My wife wanted the Evo for the larger MP camera and bigger screen so we ended up with one of each. Form the time i've spent on my wife's evo and the time she has spent with my Epic we both have to agree that the Epic preforms far better in realworld test. The scrolling is smother and it has a better overall experience than the evo. So forget about benchmarks... just try one head to head and you'll see which one is the better device..
I've said this before and will say it again. My rooted evo with cm6 and oced to 1.12 ghz isn't as smooth as my epic was out the box. My evo gets 1500 on quadrent while my epic gets 1100 with no jit. Now you tell me wich phone is faster?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
gTen said:
To give an example, its like one person actually taking a test, while the other is copying off an answer sheet..who will be the fastest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The person taking the test will be faster since the copier has to wait for the answers.
Facepalm...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
crabjoe said:
The person taking the test will be faster since the copier has to wait for the answers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...your assuming he is copying from the other persons answer sheet and not the teacher's answer sheet...must we really get into this? >.> lol
Either way thats the reason...
crabjoe said:
The person taking the test will be faster since the copier has to wait for the answers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Winner by TKO.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Squirel aids!
Isn't it amazing that almost 6 days before the release of the Galaxy s 3 in the U.S. that there's been no leakage of benchmarks, T mobile software on the S3 or anything pertaining to comparison between the 2gigs and S4 vs the Exynos edition?
It's just different because we usually have something besides specs when there's less than a week to go for a release.
I don't want to waste my time purchasing the phone and having to send it back because it's not as smooth as the UK varient. I truly wanted exynos but currently banking on the 2 gigs for a wash. Samsung and T -mo won't be getting my $650 if not
stepinmyworld said:
Isn't it amazing that almost 6 days before the release of the Galaxy s 3 in the U.S. that there's been no leakage of benchmarks, T mobile software on the S3 or anything pertaining to comparison between the 2gigs and S4 vs the Exynos edition?
It's just different because we usually have something besides specs when there's less than a week to go for a release.
I don't want to waste my time purchasing the phone and having to send it back because it's not as smooth as the UK varient. I truly wanted exynos but currently banking on the 2 gigs for a wash. Samsung and T -mo won't be getting my $650 if not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They haven't tested this particular SoC, but there are plenty of tests and benchmarks with the US version of the HTC One X, and that thing runs great. So you are safe to assume the Galaxy S III will run smooth, especially since it has 2GB of ram instead of 1GB on the One X.
Don't worry, the phone is gonna feel buttery smooth.
stuff said:
They haven't tested this particular SoC, but there are plenty of tests and benchmarks with the US version of the HTC One X, and that thing runs great. So you are safe to assume the Galaxy S III will run smooth, especially since it has 2GB of ram instead of 1GB on the One X.
Don't worry, the phone is gonna feel buttery smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool.. I've noticed the HTC One x web browsing and smoothness throughout sense 4/ICS wasn't all that smooth.. I also had the HTC one s from T mobile and it wasn't as fast a benchmarks indicated with real life use.. Now maybe that's just because of a buggy sense 4.0 or the fact that the S4 is just a number puncher and not a buttery smooth processor like the Exynos definitely is.
Thanks for your reply
http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/06/04/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-initial-benchmarks-and-hands-on-impressions/
They have the Canadian version but it still has the s4 processor and 2 gigs of ram
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
ebejoe said:
http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/06/04/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-initial-benchmarks-and-hands-on-impressions/
They have the Canadian version but it still has the s4 processor and 2 gigs of ram
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG thank you!!!!! watching now ))) made my day
ebejoe said:
http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/06/04/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-initial-benchmarks-and-hands-on-impressions/
They have the Canadian version but it still has the s4 processor and 2 gigs of ram
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing it. Strange that the international gs3 with lower single threaded values outperforms it in quadrant.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
ceo.mtcl said:
Thanks for sharing it. Strange that the international gs3 with lower single threaded values outperforms it in quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first time i saw a 6000 score.. that's probably rooted with processor tweaks
thanks for the link for the S4 chip!
there have been lots of debate regarding the S4 vs Exynos. imo, the S4 is a better CPU whereas the Exynos has the better GPU.
i've said this time and time again, if you upload/download a lot of files (esp big ones), the S4 is the one for you. if you want to play a lot of high end games on your phone, the Exynos is for you, though not many games take advantage of that right now.
on the CPU front, no applications make use of quad-core. a lot of apps have just now started making use of quad-cores.
stepinmyworld said:
first time i saw a 6000 score.. that's probably rooted with processor tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is running siyah kernel with 1400 processor speed no oc or UV.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I agree with the OP - very freaking odd that none have showed up on eBay, stores know nothing about it, no reviews, nothing.
mrvirginia said:
thanks for the link for the S4 chip!
there have been lots of debate regarding the S4 vs Exynos. imo, the S4 is a better CPU whereas the Exynos has the better GPU.
i've said this time and time again, if you upload/download a lot of files (esp big ones), the S4 is the one for you. if you want to play a lot of high end games on your phone, the Exynos is for you, though not many games take advantage of that right now.
on the CPU front, no applications make use of quad-core. a lot of apps have just now started making use of quad-cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks... However, i feel that the Enynos in the Galaxy s 2 was so smooth that Android should make it mandatory for all android handsets lol... GPU must have to do with the browser performance as well because of the graphics in pinch to zoom.. I have yet to see a browser, even with the s4 (HTC series phones) zoom in and out of flash heavy websites with buttery smooth performance like the exynos ALWAYS DOES. That's what I'm looking for. Hopefully this verision will be as buttery as the Exynos.. people wonder why it's so popular.. it's just that gooood!
I just want to know what soundchip the U.S variant has.
First video I've seen with a US variant:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=0Zl6zOFUM7M
skillzo1 said:
I just want to know what soundchip the U.S variant has.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol yep. me too. supposedly from the sprint launch party, a rep confirmed a wolfson.
ceo.mtcl said:
It is running siyah kernel with 1400 processor speed no oc or UV.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well yeah lol.. that's why it has an increased quadrant score
jdlorinser said:
First video I've seen with a US variant:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=0Zl6zOFUM7M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol that was one of the worst reviews i've ever seen
jdlorinser said:
First video I've seen with a US variant:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=0Zl6zOFUM7M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol never been so bored in my life... no kind of tour through the software.. just holding it and talking about specs. but thanks
teatime0315 said:
lol that was one of the worst reviews i've ever seen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmaoooooo
stepinmyworld said:
lmaoooooo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, hey at least she showed us a US variant on video. No one else has.
While I agree the video wasn't great, it wasn't a review. Kudos to Radio Shack though for being the only ones to actually post ANYTHING about the phone beyond a release date.
---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:23 PM ----------
jdlorinser said:
Lol, hey at least she showed us a US variant on video. No one else has.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha same though I just had
http://www.slashgear.com/htc-one-benchmarks-off-the-charts-19270000/
Wow!
This score really tempting me to make an upgrade with my phone, the only one missing is the water an dust proof.
Warm regards from Indonesia in my Motorola Galaxy s3
more
http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-benchmark-scores-are-here-ready-to-blow-your-mind/
what does Benchmark Pi test, thats the one that shows huge difference between the S4pro on XZ, Rest are barely anything for me personally. I think some had held back by chrome on the XZ.
all these benchmarks are looking incredible
i cant freaking wait till source is out for the kernel
OVER 9000!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Way over! Damn!
Htc one got 12000+
SKYDRAGON, El M1
Things I am more interested about --
1] Geekbench
2] GLbenchmark
3] Kraken, Octane, Peacekeeper
I thought people stopped using Quadrant long back. Apparently I was very wrong
Zarboz said:
i cant freaking wait till source is out for the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Zarboz you planning on getting one of these?
btw I usually would put more emphasis on touch responsiveness and UI smoothness/consistent framerate as compared to benchmark scores However benchmark scores of this phone do show that it is in a whole other class compared to any other phone out right now... but I guess it is the first of the next generation, just like the One X was
We'll have to see what the rest are like, especially the GS4
For sure sg4 will be plastic as usually, with a bunch of stuff like multi windows, s vocie and so on that i turn off, just to save battery. Really, samy does it cheaper... Also twz is ugly and boring.
Or wait to X Moto phone
SkyDragon Team© No Kangy rom allowed.
Maximum can get quadrant benchmark on my s3 just around 8k
Htc one too powerful, big thanks to s600 new processor always better than old processor lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Those are really high numbers. I'm assuming some sort of custom rom, and /or over clocked? The M7 is running pre released stock sense, I wonder what an over clocked kernel running custom or AOSP would give!
Sent from my One V using xda app-developers app
3D benchmarks.....all these get boring when the GPUs power is not fully shown for a game freak like me.....those front speakers with gaming:what::what::what: can't wait.
Gamers leegoooo
Sent from my Desire Z using xda premium
I don't get the point in benchmarks really, what does a number really tell you? =/
One phone gets say 14,000, One gets 8,000... what does that actually translate to though? =/
XeactorZ said:
Maximum can get quadrant benchmark on my s3 just around 8k
Htc one too powerful, big thanks to s600 new processor always better than old processor lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And some people on YouTube's comment section say its 'just a little better that S3' LOL!
strip419 said:
3D benchmarks.....all these get boring when the GPUs power is not fully shown for a game freak like me.....those front speakers with gaming:what::what::what: can't wait.
Gamers leegoooo
Sent from my Desire Z using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes the most important of all is Glbenchmark
kalo88 said:
I don't get the point in benchmarks really, what does a number really tell you? =/
One phone gets say 14,000, One gets 8,000... what does that actually translate to though? =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use phone x, y and z and observe the performance.
My experiences in Quadrant... Transform SDXed out: 500+, Evo Shift OCd 1500ish, EVO3d OCd 3900
Each phone was that much faster for games and real world use, mostly.
The outlier was the Transform, butter smooth on the UI. Better than the EVO3d on the homescreen stock. But totally crap for most anything games.
Yeah... I'm about to jump ship and come back to HTC.
Sorry Sammy
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
kalo88 said:
I don't get the point in benchmarks really, what does a number really tell you? =/
One phone gets say 14,000, One gets 8,000... what does that actually translate to though? =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put it like this. Car A can travel at a maximum speed of 100km/h while car B can travel 150km/h
the numbers are the benchmarks. Car B is faster so car A wins.
The reason why they say benchmarks are useless because let's put Car B to real life use.
Car B has 150km/h speed but would you use it in driving the streets? If yes then good luck on the speed limit cameras.
Riyal said:
Put it like this. Car A can travel at a maximum speed of 100km/h while car B can travel 150km/h
the numbers are the benchmarks. Car B is faster so car A wins.
The reason why they say benchmarks are useless because let's put Car B to real life use.
Car B has 150km/h speed but would you use it in driving the streets? If yes then good luck on the speed limit cameras.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well... yes... but there can sometimes be an indirect effect on things like battery life. If a chipset is capable of doing more processing for the same amount of power, that likely means it can do the same amount of processing with less power, which means the battery will last longer.
Also, once apps start to become more demanding in the future - more complex 3D games that come out in a year or so - the phones that are faster in the benchmarks now will be able to play newer games for longer before hitting frame-rates that are too low to be enjoyable.
Think of it as car B having a more powerful engine, which lets it go up steeper hills while carrying the same load.
An antuntu benchmark for the S4 has leaked it's specs.
Network: GSM/WCDMA/LTE
CPU: Exynos 5410 1.8Ghz
CPU Cores: 4 + 4!!
GPU Model: PowerVR SGX 544 MP
System: OS 4.2
Display:
Screen size: 4.99
Resolution: 1920X1080
Camera:
Front cam: 2.1 mp
Rear: 13 mp
RAM: 2 gb.
Antutu populates that information by hand for the major devices, it cannot be retrieved from the system information.
Without confirmation it means nothing.
Speculation, in the case of them manually putting it on their servers, if it's automatic it's a fake benchmark.
delsus said:
Speculation, in the case of them manually putting it on their servers, if it's automatic it's a fake benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as the galaxy s III, the SIV will have two diferent processors.. in america with 4g there will be a snaprdragon...meanwhile in europe the exynos octa *_*
I´m not sure if I´d still buy a S4 since I´m quite happy with my S3
ratchet2012a said:
as the galaxy s III, the SIV will have two diferent processors.. in america with 4g there will be a snaprdragon...meanwhile in europe the exynos octa *_*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy crap more than 40000 in antutu
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
qualcomm ****edup
yahyoh said:
holy crap more than 40000 in antutu
qualcomm ****edup
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... sometimes you really post some nonsense.
Those numbers are just dividers, the actual score is 24.5k...
AndreiLux said:
.... sometimes you really post some nonsense.
Those numbers are just dividers, the actual score is 24.5k...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol i forgot
edit : it about 25k in bar chart which not close to tegra 4 at all if they're real
Facepalm, upon facepalm, upon facepalm. I'll go ahead and cite what the great Codeworkx has in his signature. A very inspiring line of text, actually.
Codeworkx said:
DON'T TRUST ANY BENCHMARK UNLESS YOU FAKED IT BY YOURSELF!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people also don't seem to really grasp that it's possible, with a few smaller edits, to make a device display as another device. Is it really that hard to just wait until the darn presentation of the device (March 14th, I think it was) before getting hyped about possibly faked specifications?
Theshawty said:
Facepalm, upon facepalm, upon facepalm. I'll go ahead and cite what the great Codeworkx has in his signature. A very inspiring line of text, actually.
Some people also don't seem to really grasp that it's possible, with a few smaller edits, to make a device display as another device. Is it really that hard to just wait until the darn presentation of the device (March 14th, I think it was) before getting hyped about possibly faked specifications?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as i know u can't fake CPU - GPU - screen res in Antutu : ( until u hack their servers or the app or maybe they fake it) who knows
Omg omg omg look what I got my hands on!!!
ratchet2012a said:
as the galaxy s III, the SIV will have two diferent processors.. in america with 4g there will be a snaprdragon...meanwhile in europe the exynos octa *_*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but apparently there's supposed to be a problem with the exynos octa overheating
So we'll just have to wait and see
stupidly will be met by sarcasm
ratchet2012a said:
as the galaxy s III, the SIV will have two diferent processors.. in america with 4g there will be a snaprdragon...meanwhile in europe the exynos octa *_*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was speculation by a major analyst. It isn't fact, it's just an educated guess at this point.
It could be official.
AFAIK, I don't believe benchmark scores in antuntu.
If you put trust into those scores, you could say that dancing around in your garden naked for 5 minutes increases your device's performance.
Well but the specs do look somewhat similiar to what we heard.
Wasn't the rumour of 13 mp, 2gb ram and 8 cores going around?
And here's proof:
I saw an article up on DroidViews as well about this. He was decent enough to upload a photo.
Whats this obsession with posting S4 things in a s3 forum?
©®™
masterex567 said:
It could be official.
AFAIK, I don't believe benchmark scores in antuntu.
If you put trust into those scores, you could say that dancing around in your garden naked for 5 minutes increases your device's performance.
Well but the specs do look somewhat similiar to what we heard.
Wasn't the rumour of 13 mp, 2gb ram and 8 cores going around?
And here's proof:
I saw an article up on DroidViews as well about this. He was decent enough to upload a photo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except antutu doesn't recognise the GT-I9500 as the S4 yet.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
delsus said:
Except antutu doesn't recognise the GT-I9500 as the S4 yet.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah its missing a bit of authenticity
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
DSA said:
Whats this obsession with posting S4 things in a s3 forum?
©®™
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No idea.
I've seen people posting s4 things here,
When s3 was releasing the s2 forums were filled with s3 leaks etc.
When s2 was releasing the s forums were filled with s2 leaks.
Looks like a chain cycle.
masterex567 said:
No idea.
I've seen people posting s4 things here,
When s3 was releasing the s2 forums were filled with s3 leaks etc.
When s2 was releasing the s forums were filled with s2 leaks.
Looks like a chain cycle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Always has been, always will be
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Please continue the discussion here.