Related
htc have released source code at htcdev.com, including i have noted, a gingerbread update for desire. would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
it will be an interesting next few weeks
1. Wrong forum
2. Already posted on the main news page
3. Gingerbread for desire is released last week already but not the kernel source
4. Source codes were always there on the htcdev site, nothing new
Dont post things too fast m8, i know everyone is excited about the desire gingerbread rom and how it potentially can fix the graphic glitches on the sense roms (is'nt even sure it will be fixed).
Please correct me if i'm wrong i dont think there is much to develop anymore for our HD2's as there are android builds that run as fast as stable as any generic android device.
The only big thing i can imagine that still can be developed is true 720p recording and i dont know if the source code will help getting this to work. i'm not a dev
a dead man said:
would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's not a source code of Desire kernel but "only" upgrade Desire to Ginger.
a dead man said:
htc have released source code at htcdev.com, including i have noted, a gingerbread update for desire. would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
it will be an interesting next few weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thisa was posted yesterday and was in the wrong forum and you have done it again today, there is already 2 other threads about this going in Q&A
needs KERNEL source not the release of GB
I know this is a dead thread, but one question that has been on my mind. If a kernel can be compiled can't the kernel be decompiled to study the source code? Just a thought.
[email protected] said:
I know this is a dead thread, but one question that has been on my mind. If a kernel can be compiled can't the kernel be decompiled to study the source code? Just a thought.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Decompiled software is very hard to read, follow and understand. The "decompilation" process does not result in the original source code but in assembler code, which is big, ugly and meant for machines not people.
deviant007 said:
Decompiled software is very hard to read, follow and understand. The "decompilation" process does not result in the original source code but in assembler code, which is big, ugly and meant for machines not people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. Thank you for the answer.
One question guys, may be in the wrong thread but excuse me. I just wondering...HTC realesed upgrade for Desire some time ago, Is it that they are not yet published the source code does not break the rules of the General Public License (GPL)?
dell 0000000000000
dell 00000000000
reserve 2 ---
Shweet!!!!! If I knew how to code..I would surely help you!(If you have anything easy to work on..do tell )
I will die for it IceCream!!! the camera speed is so fast..
Using Gingerbread as a base presumably?
Given the amount of "non-standard" hardware in the SGS2, you'll need support libs from either an existing non-AOSP OEM firmware, or from CM7 won't you?
great.. i hope u will port in a bunch of days
it's so great.you can do it!
tongqihua said:
it's so great.you can do it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no he can't. There isn't a FULL system dump of the Galaxy Nexus yet. There is only the dump from the SDK. He will probably theme it like Ice Cream Sandwich. Anyways good luck to the dev
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
LuffyPSP said:
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not the point. Of course, a dump would be a lot better. But being the first to port and get a working SDK rom... Now that's where the fun is
It is possible, we have the full SDK ROM.
Ask galnet how you import proprietary files with dependencies
Sent from my GT-I9100
I am working on it!
I am very newbie but we can do something
May the force be with you.. And make it fast cause i am getting itchy already hahaha... Goodluck.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Face lockscreen already in SGS2 but not enabled
I can help you!!
hobbit19 said:
hello Friends
I started work porting IceCreamSandwich SDK port on the Samsung Galaxy S II
Details very soon!!
if there are developers willing to help me write a personal message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great!!!
10chars
I for one don't see this working as every device seems to be getting the same LibC error at the moment (except for some reason the G2).
The best hope seems to be getting a HC rom to work then using the boot.img from that to boot the ICS sdk port. (this is what we believe happened with the G2 to get it to boot)
I would be satisfied with the new gmail application including widget
Cheers!
Looking to try .Hope you have a great ICS.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Porting info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
Our device is WIP (Work in Progress): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
tpr0 said:
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Once the source code is release, porting will be rolling here
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets hope its compatible with tegra2. I have a windows 8 tablet with real windows, but ubuntu on my atrix i dont say no i hope the experience is good like on the desktop ubuntu.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
harszeee said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea because it's not really a proof that it is working for our tegra phone. it's a lot different so u have to find a phone that has the same specs this but there is no one.
let's see if it will work for us that would be awesome
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
harszeee said:
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, he identifies the device about 10 seconds or so in, but admittedly if he didn't the only other way to identify it would be process of elimination, looking at the logo's and figuring it out that way.
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
DowJonesARG said:
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please don't force the devs to support our phone. just let the image release si the devs can see the source code and the system. After that we can ask to import the os to the atrix if it's possible.
Just be patience.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Sorry is just my nerves speaking. Hope to see it in action soon.
Enviado desde mi Atrix4G
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
wildchild048 said:
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah tomorrow is porting lesson can the thread maker update and copy this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting in? so the people who are intersted can hangout too so we get more people
Do you have, or may be adapted upload released today? ubuntu can only hope that this is no longer
It's released and port lessons are there xD Let's hope it works on atrix
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Let's hope epinter can work his magic and port this for us.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
So no devs are interested?
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
please install atrix 4g
rjayflo said:
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this will be fully working without an ICS Kernel.
I think an effort like this worths a try, since we can aways update the userspace ubuntu packages, keeping the old kernel. I don't see why the old gingerbread kernel wouldn't work.
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com
Currently this port is going into fastboot only , no adb
I hope through this thread i can gather devs who can help me fix these issues.
Based on 4.4.4
LINK
Changes made :
- Recompiled the CM kernel to work with Sense plus bacon
- Optimized system
- Build.prop changes
- Made the necessary changes in the system framework,libs & other files to match our device
- Apks are fully zipaligned
Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks .:)
Post1
Mine for the future
fahadali2315 said:
Currently this port is going into fastboot only , no adb .
I hope through this thread i can gather devs who can help me fix these issues.
Based on 4.4.4
LINK
Changes made :
- Recompiled the CM kernel to work with Sense plus bacon
- Optimized system
Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks .:)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this a full port of sense with camera and all other things or theming? It's booting? If you create a list of bugs maybe if a dev who already ported sense could give you some hints on how to solve bugs Anyway you are great!
fahadali2315 said:
Currently this port is going into fastboot only , no adb .
I hope through this thread i can gather devs who can help me fix these issues.
Based on 4.4.4
LINK
Changes made :
- Recompiled the CM kernel to work with Sense plus bacon
- Optimized system
Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks .:)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes!!!! Welcome back to the game Fahad!
phoenixita said:
Is this a full port of sense with camera and all other things or theming? It's booting? If you create a list of bugs maybe if a dev who already ported sense could give you some hints on how to solve bugs Anyway you are great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was the dev that first ported S5 ROMs fully working on a Note 3, which sparked up the entire Note 3 ROM community. It'll be a full sense ROM for sure, adjusted to run on our devices.
phoenixita said:
Is this a full port of sense with camera and all other things or theming? It's booting? If you create a list of bugs maybe if a dev who already ported sense could give you some hints on how to solve bugs Anyway you are great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now i am looking for a full 100% sense 6 port based on 4.4.4 to match our cm11's latest builds.
kernel was modded to work with the port i have already made the necessary changes working with devs who already ported sense to aosp phones.
So let's see. I will carry on my side of the work but just posted here so others also know and maybe generate something useful for the whole community
nicholaschum said:
Yes!!!! Welcome back to the game Fahad!
He was the dev that first ported S5 ROMs fully working on a Note 3, which sparked up the entire Note 3 ROM community. It'll be a full sense ROM for sure, adjusted to run on our devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are too kind my friend
Why don't you try opening a thread in the android development section? You could use this one for general discussions like these and the other for the real development..I think more developers will see the thread in the development section of the forum...In my opinion this will give more attention to your work
phoenixita said:
Why don't you try opening a thread in the android development section? You could use this one for general discussions like these and the other for the real development..I think more developers will see the thread in the development section of the forum...In my opinion this will give more attention to your work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what i am saying from experience if i open up a thread in development forum , people will start cussing me for not uploading the right thing or whatever that's why i have posted in general, dont want any headache.
phoenixita said:
Why don't you try opening a thread in the android development section? You could use this one for general discussions like these and the other for the real development..I think more developers will see the thread in the development section of the forum...In my opinion this will give more attention to your work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fahadali2315 said:
This is what i am saying from experience if i open up a thread in development forum , people will start cussing me for not uploading the right thing or whatever that's why i have posted in general, dont want any headache.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah at the moment I think @fahadali2315 has posted this in the right place, at least until it gets off the ground a bit. Good work!
Transmitted via Bacon
Siiiiiick can't wait!!
Oh yes can't wait for this!
As per my knowledge , i would like a bit of help from a dev who has expertise dealing with kernels
Already set the bootpath to HTC one and setup adb and mtp at startup , all in vain . still going to fastboot
DEVS DEVS feel free to jump in anytime
This woukd be unbelievable man!
Great stuff. Looking forward to it
Sent from my OnePlusOne
fahadali2315 said:
As per my knowledge , i would like a bit of help from a dev who has expertise dealing with kernels
Already set the bootpath to HTC one and setup adb and mtp at startup , all in vain . still going to fastboot
DEVS DEVS feel free to jump in anytime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When i had One S a dev helped porting new sense version...Maybe you could ask him for some help! He is a great developer.. His username is @pirlano ( sorry for the tag man)
Used to try your s5 port on the note 3, switching from AOSP.. No way that's gonna happen on OPO @fahadali2315 but wish you all the best for this project brah..
Khizar said:
Used to try your s5 port on the note 3, switching from AOSP.. No way that's gonna happen on OPO @fahadali2315 but wish you all the best for this project brah..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate still stuck at fastboot so lets see.
I hope this works out. Berm waiting for a sense 6 port for ages lol
I love Sense 6 and almost rooted my phone just to be able to install Blinkfeed launcher. I won my 1+1 from InsanityWeek and about only thing I miss from my HTC One is Sense.
Gonna keep eye on this thread for sure.
fahadali2315 said:
Currently this port is going into fastboot only , no adb
I hope through this thread i can gather devs who can help me fix these issues.
Based on 4.4.4
LINK
Changes made :
- Recompiled the CM kernel to work with Sense plus bacon
- Optimized system
- Build.prop changes
- Made the necessary changes in the system framework,libs & other files to match our device
- Apks are fully zipaligned
Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks .:)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dope! Great Port.