Database Users

[Info] ICS KERNEL SOURCE OPENED!!! * Added MIRROR

http://opensource.samsung.com/
YEAH!! Go go go Custom Kernel!!
EDIT :
MIRROR!
http://www.mediafire.com/?y14t9y9j661jmt3
is alright?

I have made a request to Samsung for having N7000 ICS sources.
Did it yesterday got it today.

This is great yes the ics is there so this means we may know why the bug gets triggered
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2

finally. ... hopefully that bug will be solved

Itching to flash safe roms LOL

It downloads at spectacular 10Kb/s.

chasmodo said:
It downloads at spectacular 10Kb/s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.mediafire.com/?y14t9y9j661jmt3
is mirror

sjkoon said:
http://opensource.samsung.com/
YEAH!! Go go go Custom Kernel!!
EDIT :
MIRROR!
http://www.mediafire.com/?y14t9y9j661jmt3
is alright?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate. added in the thread in dev section too if its ok

chasmodo said:
It downloads at spectacular 10Kb/s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloading at 578KBps at the moment from official site

Great news! I'm downloading it! Hope to see something cool!

Update 3 is out of the source code i guess thats the only one , now hope we can get going on the custom kernels

sjkoon said:
http://www.mediafire.com/?y14t9y9j661jmt3
is mirror
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem for me downloading at 416KBps at the moment.

nandihno said:
This is great yes the ics is there so this means we may know why the bug gets triggered
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow soo funny.. anyway thanks

Bump
For bringing it on top.
Other threads have been locked.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

So what does it mean for users.
Does it mean that ROMs like CM9 will start supporting everything like S-Pen, FM radio etc.,?
Or does it mean we will see slightly modified versions of stock roms. For example touchwiz removed, but swype there.

tsk1979 said:
So what does it mean for users.
Does it mean that ROMs like CM9 will start supporting everything like S-Pen, FM radio etc.,?
Or does it mean we will see slightly modified versions of stock roms. For example touchwiz removed, but swype there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of above +
Awesome custom kernels from devs.
Not sure about FM Radio though....
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

tsk1979 said:
So what does it mean for users.
Does it mean that ROMs like CM9 will start supporting everything like S-Pen, FM radio etc.,?
Or does it mean we will see slightly modified versions of stock roms. For example touchwiz removed, but swype there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are going to see a lot of different Roms once we have several safe custom kerenels.
CM9 will always remain lean and Samsung-free, but there'll be lots of CM9-based hybrid Roms catering for everybody's needs. Also, a lot of TW-based Roms.
I suspect that our Dev will soon start to look like SGS2 one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1058
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1204

Yeahh! Im wainting for speedmod kernel and and update of stunner rom
Enviat des del meu GT-N7000

Arobase40 said:
As suspected, the N7000 ICS kernel is far from different from any i9100 iCS kernels !!!
I made comparison from all i91000 ICS kernels, and there were only slight diffs from "European" (called Open source : GT-I9100_ICS and GT-I9100P_ICS), with Korean Update 3 and Update 4.
The major changes came from i9100 Korean ICS update 5 !!!
This first N7000 ICS kernel is completely different from any previously quoted i9100 ICS kernels, including Korean ICS update 5 !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So does this mean this source is really old or maybe really new?

I hope kernel devs sees this and take into account: best feature of a kernel will be dual-boot mode, like siyah's kernel for SGS2 :X

Best rom for Galaxy Y?

Is there any custom rom which is stable and has no bugs?

Search !!!
Read !!!
Try !!!!!

Every rom is awesome try all n decide which one u like the best...
For mee itz ussrv4 with jellybean taste
Sent from my y.

for me COD rom plus savie's latest kernel
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2

another stupid thread with a stupid question,

aniket.lamba said:
Is there any custom rom which is stable and has no bugs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undoubtedly chobits digitalis

Oh god!!!! U guys are awesome.. from where u guys come from??
In galaxy y forum I can only see spam and spam..

tired of seeing this kind of thread in Q&A OMG!! there's alot of like this thread in here
GO TO ANDROID DEVELOPMENTS!!! SEARCH AND READ THE COMMENTS OF THE TESTERS!

deathnotice01 said:
another stupid thread with a stupid question,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True
Peace
Hit Thanks & It will Disappear
Sent from S II Running Official ICS 4.0.4 with Siyah 4.1 [/size]

Dude I've already flashed around 40 roms so that is why I was asking... :/
Sent from Micromax A90 using xda premium

aniket.lamba said:
Dude I've already flashed around 40 roms so that is why I was asking... :/
Sent from Micromax A90 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there was a single best rom, all other roms' threads would have been closed in the dev section. But has it been done? No! This is because every user has different views about different roms. The dev of a particular rom designed it with features and themes that he liked. So you gotta try different roms, and see which one you like the most. If you didn't like any one of 'em, use stock or make your own custom rom. Now i suppose you've understood why we don't encourage these kinds of threads here.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

Thanks for the help and sorry for this useless thread.. ::happy::
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

anasdcool71 said:
If there was a single best rom, all other roms' threads would have been closed in the dev section. But has it been done? No! This is because every user has different views about different roms. The dev of a particular rom designed it with features and themes that he liked. So you gotta try different roms, and see which one you like the most. If you didn't like any one of 'em, use stock or make your own custom rom. Now i suppose you've understood why we don't encourage these kinds of threads here.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm reading the thread. Before I post what do I want to say. I found this, probably the best answer for this or your thread. :victory:

Every rom has it own pros and cons bro... It depend from which side did u see... Stability? Graphic / UI? Hard or smooth?? Every rom is different....
Sorry for my bad english ..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

Jelly Blast v3,03 is the best
aniket.lamba said:
Is there any custom rom which is stable and has no bugs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u want to have a rom with no bugs go for jelly blast v3.03 by abhijit..

anasdcool71 said:
If there was a single best rom, all other roms' threads would have been closed in the dev section. But has it been done? No! This is because every user has different views about different roms. The dev of a particular rom designed it with features and themes that he liked. So you gotta try different roms, and see which one you like the most. If you didn't like any one of 'em, use stock or make your own custom rom. Now i suppose you've understood why we don't encourage these kinds of threads here.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that explaination man,
Awesome paragraph
this post is approved by the national potato safety regulation

deathnotice01 said:
Thanks for that explaination man,
Awesome paragraph
this post is approved by the national potato safety regulation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kinda had forgot about even posting that. It's been more than a month!
||I'm just a PM away for help||

Since I'm a noob and have a noob question I'm going to hijack this thread instead of starting a new one since my question is related to this topic:
I see many of you are frequently switching roms on your devices. Testing out new ones regularly. Do you always have to re-download all your apps and tweak their settings after each time? Or is there some way to back up all the apps and their settings before flashing and restore everything on the new rom?
I just got this phone a couple of days ago and immediately decided to try a different rom (stock one drains battery) so I went for chobits digitalis and am very happy (only found one bug, maybe two), but I had to re-download everything I had and tweak all settings back the way the were manually after flashing... Unless there's a way?

Jellyblast v3.03
aniket.lamba said:
Is there any custom rom which is stable and has no bugs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Jellyblast rom v3.0.3 it's very stable
Give me a thanks please
---------- Post added at 09:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 AM ----------
Alliat said:
Since I'm a noob and have a noob question I'm going to hijack this thread instead of starting a new one since my question is related to this topic:
I see many of you are frequently switching roms on your devices. Testing out new ones regularly. Do you always have to re-download all your apps and tweak their settings after each time? Or is there some way to back up all the apps and their settings before flashing and restore everything on the new rom?
I just got this phone a couple of days ago and immediately decided to try a different rom (stock one drains battery) so I went for chobits digitalis and am very happy (only found one bug, maybe two), but I had to re-download everything I had and tweak all settings back the way the were manually after flashing... Unless there's a way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a nandroid backup in clockworkmod recovery
Download Titanium backup
Have a good day
Give me a thanks please

eli1030 said:
Try Jellyblast rom v3.0.3 it's very stable
Give me a thanks please
---------- Post added at 09:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 AM ----------
Do a nandroid backup in clockworkmod recovery
Download Titanium backup
Have a good day
Give me a thanks please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or u can try 2 apps from market like app backup and restore and super backup ( for contacts and msgs)..
They are easy to use..
press on thanx if i helped. if i didnt then press it again....:cowbow:

Aosp roms discussion thread. [Minor FAQ inside]

This thread is for discussing aosp roms, like Slim, Carbon, etc. except for CM though since it has its own thread. This is meant to keep the unhelping chit-chatter out of the development threads where bug reports best reside. When posting here, clarify what aosp rom you're on. Do not post bug reports here, post them in their respective development threads!
One more thing! While this thread progresses, use search and/or read the faq to see if your question has already been posted before, to avoid repetitiveness and us older lads becoming grumpy.
F.A.Q: (frequently asked questions)
I would like to dualboot, what should I do?
Flash siyah kernel
Help! I flashed siyah and now my rom doesn't boot!
It's because whatever rom you use has a newer mali driver which most kernels aren't updated for. Especially siyah which hasn't seen some dev love in ages.
What rom should I flash?
We don't know, you have to try them out yourself!
What's gapps, and is this inside xx rom?
Gapps is short for google apps, which is the Play store and some other apps you sorely need. Go too http://goo.im/gapps and download the gapps package for whatever version you have. Newer aosp roms are most certainly 4.2.2. Some roms, like Slim, have their own separate gapps packages specially made for those roms. In those cases, the standard gapps from goo.im will not work!
Help! I flashed xx rom but now it doesn't boot!
Try making a factory reset in the recovery and reflash whatever rom you were on. Also, in most cases, CWM works better for rom installations. Twrp craps out for unknown reasons.
Help! I wiped data and reflashed the rom but it still doesn't boot!
That sounds like a rom issue. Try flashing an earlier version of the rom.
Help! Something screwed up and now my phone doesn't boot anymore!
Well, reboot into recovery and see if a reflash helps. It is always recommended to regularly keep your system backed up in case something nasty happens. Perform a nandroid backup every once in a while.
What is a nandroid backup?
It's like a screenshot of your current state which you can return to if something bad happens. A nandroid backup backs up the system, boot (kernel) and data and, if specified/selectable, it also backs up cache and recovery. Maybe even efs (in twrp). However, it doesn't back up the modem!
I flashed xx kernel and I now get a black screen upon reboot!
That is because the rom you flashed has the new mali driver from the 4.2.1 leak and the kernel you flashed isn't updated with this driver. Stay on the provided kernel for now.
Thanks to:
I forgot to give thanks where due, and I'm so sorry for that. If I got an advice from you, hit me up and your name goes on this list.
C_tho; for mentioning the mali driver stuff.
Noble Sir Slaphead20; for suggesting I'd maintain an FAQ and suggesting I'd make an entry covering gapps.

great..let me fire up first noob ?...other than siyah any other kernel supports dual boot of cm & sammy rom/ cm or aokp...
edit i know its kernel ? but still related to cm or aokp...

Re: Aosp roms discussion thread.
kevinarjun said:
great..let me fire up first noob ?...other than siyah any other kernel supports dual boot of cm & sammy rom/ cm or aokp...
edit i know its kernel ? but still related to cm or aokp...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, only siyah
---------- Post added at 08:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:53 PM ----------
@Theshawty....maybe as the thread develops you can add a FAQ?

kevinarjun said:
great..let me fire up first noob ?...other than siyah any other kernel supports dual boot of cm & sammy rom/ cm or aokp...
edit i know its kernel ? but still related to cm or aokp...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only Siyah, and Siyah only supports the older aosp roms.
Speaking of aosp, I just had an urge to flash Carbon. Think I'll do it, because I'm a bit bored of running touchwiz and I've run CM for so long I need change. I didn't like RootBox that much (too many settings, lol. I like a "leaner" setup) and there's no official aokp for our device. I also didn't like Slim, so I'll give Carbon another go.
slaphead20 said:
Nope, only siyah
---------- Post added at 08:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:53 PM ----------
@Theshawty....maybe as the thread develops you can add a FAQ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I had in mind to add a smaller faq.

would suggest you also try JellyBam...

kevinarjun said:
would suggest you also try JellyBam...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not gonna happen
jellybam isnt a welcome rom here

kevinarjun said:
would suggest you also try JellyBam...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DSA said:
not gonna happen
jellybam isnt a welcome rom here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What DSA said. We do not welcome JellyBam here anymore because the developer broke a lot of rules of XDA. Plagiarism and violating the gpl, amongst others.
----------
I updated the op with a small faq. More to come in the following days.

In the Faqs it might be worth mentioning in the gapps bit that some Roms ie slim, have their own gapps, and others won't work

Just flashed Carbon 1.5, not regretting it thus far! This ROM gives the word buttery smooth a whole new meaning!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Not sure this goes here, but ill give it a go anyways.
In the Slimbean thread there was a lot of talk about mali drivers. Now could someone please give me some info on the matter cause seems like I missed something.
Basicly what im wondering is whats up with the mali drivers and why do I want them?
Sorry if this is off-topic or has been answered somewhere else.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk HD

looking to switch to a AOSP ROM, what do you think about Super Nexus? Seems like the definition of AOSP

Glebun said:
looking to switch to a AOSP ROM, what do you think about Super Nexus? Seems like the definition of AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slim is definitely worth a go as well

slaphead20 said:
Slim is definitely worth a go as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, running it now with no problems.
Carbon is nice as well..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Jns said:
Not sure this goes here, but ill give it a go anyways.
In the Slimbean thread there was a lot of talk about mali drivers. Now could someone please give me some info on the matter cause seems like I missed something.
Basicly what im wondering is whats up with the mali drivers and why do I want them?
Sorry if this is off-topic or has been answered somewhere else.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They fix the graphics glitches and completely without memory leaks.
Glebun said:
looking to switch to a AOSP ROM, what do you think about Super Nexus? Seems like the definition of AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should give Carbon a try, it's THE definition of buttery smooth and come with some neat customization.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Glebun said:
looking to switch to a AOSP ROM, what do you think about Super Nexus? Seems like the definition of AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only problem with SuperNexus is it is updated very slowly. Also Faryaab has exams to do now, so it will not get updated at least until he is done with them.
If you want a super light rom I would reccomend SlimBean it's fast, and light, battery is acceptable, and it's easy to change settings like screen density and navbar settings without having to edit build.prop and decompile framework-res.apk, which you will have to do on SuperNexus.

what about the smoothness of it?

Another one there to vouch for Carbon, running it on both phone and tablet
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

I love AOSP Roms and thank you for starting this thread. Unfortunately I am afraid that I can't use such Roms as a daily driver because of the camera problems. Bluetooth also seems to be a problem for some users.

Guys I am facing Memory leak problem with the Slim bean 4.2.2.....is it normal? cant seems to find any solution....

you'd be better off asking in the slim thread

Fix turned off charging on Cm roms bounty $$$

Hi.! Its bounty if some one wanna earn $$$ credits ....for moblie off charging bug ....with animation on CM , Aosp roms... would appreciate. .. cheers
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

djmax81 said:
Hi.! Its bounty if some one wanna earn $$$ credits ....for moblie off charging bug ....with animation on CM , Aosp roms... would appreciate. .. cheers
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can as well ask the dev of your ROM to do it...directly and pay him he may be more familiar and do it in lesser time too
Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

djmax81 said:
Hi.! Its bounty if some one wanna earn $$$ credits ....for moblie off charging bug ....with animation on CM , Aosp roms... would appreciate. .. cheers
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is actually a bug in the AOSP kernels, which does not show the charging animation during charging while phone is turned off.
It can be fixed in the Kernel (not the ROM), as explained here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2293095&page=3
and was done by CharsiBabu on his CM kernel for another phone (Galaxy Y):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2242687
He basically fixed it by modifying the ramdisk, so hopefully N7100 AOSP Kernel developers will implement the same fix in their kernels (I contacted simone201 yesterday, giving all this info to him, in hope he will fix it in his NEAK Kernel, but haven't heard back yet).

yup .! i know though thanx
doclucas said:
There is actually a bug in the AOSP kernels, which does not show the charging animation during charging while phone is turned off.
It can be fixed in the Kernel (not the ROM), as explained here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2293095&page=3
and was done by CharsiBabu on his CM kernel for another phone (Galaxy Y):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2242687
He basically fixed it by modifying the ramdisk, so hopefully N7100 AOSP Kernel developers will implement the same fix in their kernels (I contacted simone201 yesterday, giving all this info to him, in hope he will fix it in his NEAK Kernel, but haven't heard back yet).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi .! tried and if see post 1 i tried my best find on xda and google too and land up solution ramdisk and .qmg animation file issue .... and manged to fix soon will share the solution too

Excellent! Looking forward to get your fix!

Did you fin the solution? Im facing the same problem here on carbon rom n7100

sebfer55 said:
Did you fin the solution? Im facing the same problem here on carbon rom n7100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also searching for a fix for my liquidsmooth 3.1 N7105. Anyone find any progress on this issue?

[Q] Building OmniRom from resources for i9100

OK, so I am not a dev.
And iam completely newbie
I saw some people saying that if you have aosp on your device it's much easier to port omnirom for your device
So can I use CyanogenMod 10.2 that is available for the i9100
To build omni
And is there any detailed instruction on how to build it !!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 4

I9100 needs some work because of its unified kernel, building it right now is pretty much useless if you don't know where to put your hands to solve some issues; I want to try it too but this project is in a early stage so I'll wait
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
I9100 needs some work because of its unified kernel, building it right now is pretty much useless if you don't know where to put your hands to solve some issues; I want to try it too but this project is in a early stage so I'll wait
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. There are two MAJOR blockers right now:
1) We haven't merged and tested the implementation of BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE yet. So if someone were to build for a Superbrick-vulnerable device, they would have a a build that risks triggering Superbrick. While I normally don't like having moderators take down builds for something, if I see builds for Superbrick-vulnerable devices show up, I'm going to work with the mods to have them taken down until EMMC wipe suppression can be verified.
2) The build system needs some changes to permit TWRP to be built on userdebug builds. Right now, the only way you'll have a chance of working recovery is with an eng build.

Entropy512 said:
Yup. There are two MAJOR blockers right now:
1) We haven't merged and tested the implementation of BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE yet. So if someone were to build for a Superbrick-vulnerable device, they would have a a build that risks triggering Superbrick. While I normally don't like having moderators take down builds for something, if I see builds for Superbrick-vulnerable devices show up, I'm going to work with the mods to have them taken down until EMMC wipe suppression can be verified.
2) The build system needs some changes to permit TWRP to be built on userdebug builds. Right now, the only way you'll have a chance of working recovery is with an eng build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can we not use cm10.2 smdk4412 kernel, @Entropy512? EMMC_WIPE is disabled there?
Also, would there be any problems if one were to remove Omni bootable project and replace it with cm10.2's?

chasmodo said:
Can we not use cm10.2 smdk4412 kernel, @Entropy512? EMMC_WIPE is disabled there?
Also, would there be any problems if one were to remove Omni bootable project and replace it with cm10.2's?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, because it could still cause damage if flashing from an old "unsafe" kernel (see the first few CM10 builds as an example...). These are far rarer now than they used to be, but there are, believe it or not, occasionally people who are flashing stuff starting from TW ICS.
And CWM has tentacles throughout the CM source tree to get it to build. It requires too many hacks in too many places. TWRP is more standalone, the limitation being that on devices with standalone recovery, Dees_Troy always built using the "eng" variant instead of "userdebug".
There's a patch that allows for TWRP to build properly on userdebug using "make recoveryimage" but it fails to allow building of TWRP into unified-recovery devices like Sony pollux_windy/yuga. (Samsung requires even more hacks...)
Even the Sonys which are "sort of" working aren't ready for builds yet - for them to work they're dependent on the FOTAKernel trick Dees_Troy developed to allow for alternate recoveries to be put on a device.

Does the above apply also to the i9100g? It has an OMAP4 processor instead of Exynos so it should be easier to build for.

aidfarh said:
Does the above apply also to the i9100g? It has an OMAP4 processor instead of Exynos so it should be easier to build for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly certain the G has unified kernel/recovery just like most of the rest of the galaxys2 family (exception being the Qualcomm-based ones).
So it might build, but recovery will not function at all until the build system is fixed to properly support TWRP on devices with unified kernel/recovery.
It has nothing to do with Qualcomm vs. OMAP vs. Exynos, except that for whatever reason, Samsung actually allowed the recovery partition to serve its normal purpose on the Skyrocket and Hercules. Actually, the Straight Talk variant of the SGH-I777 might work, as that oddball device actually DID use its recovery partition.

Entropy512 said:
I'm fairly certain the G has unified kernel/recovery just like most of the rest of the galaxys2 family (exception being the Qualcomm-based ones).
So it might build, but recovery will not function at all until the build system is fixed to properly support TWRP on devices with unified kernel/recovery.
It has nothing to do with Qualcomm vs. OMAP vs. Exynos, except that for whatever reason, Samsung actually allowed the recovery partition to serve its normal purpose on the Skyrocket and Hercules. Actually, the Straight Talk variant of the SGH-I777 might work, as that oddball device actually DID use its recovery partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there anything I can do to help? Maybe if I can make it work on my device?

So the I9000 got a build of OmniRom, I thought it has also a unified kernel !!!

I was searching on Google today
and I suddenly found this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2494127
that's an alpha build for I9100
it's using the CM10 kernel and it uses CWM not TWRP
Iam testing it right now

Jiangyi had some success getting i9100g working last night
I'm attempting to build for n7000 to see if it works at all... Who knows. Although I still need to merge in BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE...

Entropy512 said:
Jiangyi had some success getting i9100g working last night
I'm attempting to build for n7000 to see if it works at all... Who knows. Although I still need to merge in BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I built it for Note already
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495930
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

Yes @herna,you built it without a working recovery and without further testing. Nonetheless, it is running flawlessly, quicksand fluid with Raw kernel r3 and it's Cwm recovery.
Would you mind having a look at this commit.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/50800/
Fixed the mobile data drop while calling. Thanks
GALAXY NOTE N7000 // OMNI ROM // JLS36I

AA1973 said:
Yes @herna,you built it without a working recovery and without further testing. Nonetheless, it is running flawlessly, quicksand fluid with Raw kernel r3 and it's Cwm recovery.
Would you mind having a look at this commit.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/50800/
Fixed the mobile data drop while calling. Thanks
GALAXY NOTE N7000 // OMNI ROM // JLS36I
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know. Entropy and me are looking for the error, but is not beeing easy to fix. Okey, will add in a few hours and release new one. And I correct you, except the latest version, I tried all versions I released and some others I didn't release. I always do but that day I needed phone for important family things and couldn't test
Also I went to release with a prebuilt TWRP 3.0.101 kernel but XplodWilD say me that this will get Semi-Official maybe, and only compiled non-touched ROMs will be released.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
n7000 bringup would be easier, methinks.

filllob said:
@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask some DEV to try and see if works
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 mediante Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------
chasmodo said:
n7000 bringup would be easier, methinks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N7000 is gonna be up as soon as XplodWild get free and merge it and change something I said him. Idk why my Gerrit is not working. I am gonna install Ubunt 13.10 for clean and will set up all again for try if I can get Gerrit working again
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 mediante Tapatalk

I'd like to try it myself, just want to know if it's legit or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
I'd like to try it myself, just want to know if it's legit or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If is legit what? I cannot understand you, sorry. You want to try, to compile...?

i am a noob to compiling etc, only followed cm instructions.
I want to know if the changes in the commit I mentioned can be applied to i9100 too, obviously with some adjustments, and if there is something more to do to compile omni for i9100
I hope I explained myself right( English is not my language)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app