I'm using cm10 4.1.2 and I am having a lot of trouble with the kernels I have tried. Is/was there a stable kernel with overclocking ever released by a dev? I've tried faux's, clemsyn's, and mkernel and I have had no luck with any of them running smoothly. Also, do 4.2.x kernels work on 4.1.x?
bukithd said:
I'm using cm10 4.1.2 and I am having a lot of trouble with the kernels I have tried. Is/was there a stable kernel with overclocking ever released by a dev? I've tried faux's, clemsyn's, and mkernel and I have had no luck with any of them running smoothly. Also, do 4.2.x kernels work on 4.1.x?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try trinity kernel. but cm changed some stuff, so its possible that many kernels wont work with cm unless its specifically built for cm support.
Related
I´m currently using CM10 by Tezet, and I have flashed the GB kernel that Tezet put in his post. It all works nice and well, but I wanted to try Danik's MS2Ginger. Does anybody know if it works well without flashing the custom kernel from Danik? Can I just keep my current kernel? If possible, I'd appreciate the opinion of someone who has tried this.
Thanks in advance!
PS: On a side note, my current kernel (CM10) is named: 2.6.32.9- Jellybean, etc, etc. I had the impression that the Linux Kernel for Gingerbread (that is to say, the GB Kernel) was 2.6.35. Why keep the froyo kernel number?
fischer22 said:
I´m currently using CM10 by Tezet, and I have flashed the GB kernel that Tezet put in his post. It all works nice and well, but I wanted to try Danik's MS2Ginger. Does anybody know if it works well without flashing the custom kernel from Danik? Can I just keep my current kernel? If possible, I'd appreciate the opinion of someone who has tried this.
Thanks in advance!
PS: On a side note, my current kernel (CM10) is named: 2.6.32.9- Jellybean, etc, etc. I had the impression that the Linux Kernel for Gingerbread (that is to say, the GB Kernel) was 2.6.35. Why keep the froyo kernel number?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can keep your kernel but you would really benefit from the new one when using Danik's ROM. I haven't tried his ROM though.
CM10 has a thing called "2nd-boot" which allows us to boot custom kernels, from an already running kernel.
2.6.32.9 is the Linux kernel version (which btw, the number doesn't have anyhing to do with the Android version, but newer Android versions work better with newer kernels, that's why there is a WIP 3.0.8 kernel for the Defy). "Jellybean" is just the branch of code. That kernel has the ramdisk and init binaries (I think, kernel experts please correct me) necessary to boot JB.
Motorola has never actually released a kernel newer than that for the MS2, the "official GB kernel" it's an older kernel "built" for GB.
Hope it helps.
Thanks for answering!
I'm curious what everyone thinks the best Recovery is for the Razr M and what are the best kernels as far as functionality, battery life, and speed.
I haven't played around with installing custom kernels and ive been using the CWM recovery on my razr m and im currently running the AOKP custom ROM.
Dead Calm, arghhh kernel
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 4
I think cwm is better than twrp but I am prejudiced by having wiped my extSD in one of the newest versions. See my signature link for an older BETTER version.
I like TWRP 2.6.0 and I had been having great performance with Carbon ROM 1.8 running the arrrghhh kernel. Currently though I'm having issues running arrrghhh kernel with the Carbon ROM 4.3 nightly (runs smooth with the provided kernel) and yes I did use the CM 10.2 version. I'm sure this will sort it's self after a few more updates.
***edit***
as of 8/16/2013 the arrrghhh kernel and carbon rom nightlies now work together properly
Brucifer5150 said:
I like TWRP 2.6.0 and I had been having great performance with Carbon ROM 1.8 running the arrrghhh kernel. Currently though I'm having issues running arrrghhh kernel with the Carbon ROM 4.3 nightly (runs smooth with the provided kernel) and yes I did use the CM 10.2 version. I'm sure this will sort it's self after a few more updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what benefits come with using the arrrghhh kernel and is there a thread on here that i cant find? lol
jb14813 said:
what benefits come with using the arrrghhh kernel and is there a thread on here that i cant find? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over/Underclocking and more governor options you can read about it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1893050
Brucifer5150 said:
Over/Underclocking and more governor options you can read about it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1893050
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When installing a custom kernal, do i have to take any special steps such as wipe dalvic etc..? Or simply just flash zip from cwrm?
Making a backup and wiping cache and dalvik are always a good idea.
Which kernels do ppl use for AOSP ROMS? I have obly come across Samsung kernels so far and if I make the jump to AOSP I wanted to make sure I had a selection to choose from!
I'm using and am satisfied with the Chronic Kernel c:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2284252
CountParadox said:
I'm using and am satisfied with the Chronic Kernel c:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2284252
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice one and what ROM do you use with that, will it work with 4.3?
Milamber said:
Nice one and what ROM do you use with that, will it work with 4.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
CountParadox said:
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try that then! I love CM to be honest
does this also work on a sprint based S4
CountParadox said:
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a S4 model SPH-L720
will that rom allow me to hide my data stream while wifi tethered to laptop from sprint
i'm using the KT-kernel + p.a.c alpha 4.3, pretty stable and nice battery once configured
Milamber said:
Which kernels do ppl use for AOSP ROMS? I have obly come across Samsung kernels so far and if I make the jump to AOSP I wanted to make sure I had a selection to choose from!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Pfeffernuss said:
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is nothing wrong with the stock kernel, I like options...
Pfeffernuss said:
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, cm kernel is pretty smooth, but with others you have a lot of option like more governor , io scheduler ,oc ,uv ecc
kt not smoother? rofl maybe wrong configuration
I am running rooted stock 4.4, what custom kernel would go great for overclocking.
oxydo is quite simple, of that doesnt work out for you try m kernel, or the other way around, both are great
imo best oc kernel is DerKernel aka TrinitySeven.
I have flashed Franco Kernel, is that not very good
TotalMusic said:
I have flashed Franco Kernel, is that not very good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, TotalMusic....
It's very good actually. I've used franco in the past, but not of recent. However, with the release of KitKat, I've just flashed the recently released franco version, r76. All seems OK so far. Nice and smooth.
Franco's kernels are known for their smoothness and speed, as well as being good for battery life.
But they don't support overclocking.
Rgrds,
Ged.
Are they still going the CAF route? Or is that ending since it mainly had to do with freezes (if I recall) in 4.3?
It's going to affect my decision to go back to 10.1. I really want to have touch2wake on my kernel and these fixes to make faux and franco kernels function are starting to cause issues on 10.2.
AFAIK, these developers will not be supporting CAF =/
Elegant996 said:
Are they still going the CAF route? Or is that ending since it mainly had to do with freezes (if I recall) in 4.3?
It's going to affect my decision to go back to 10.1. I really want to have touch2wake on my kernel and these fixes to make faux and franco kernels function are starting to cause issues on 10.2.
AFAIK, these developers will not be supporting CAF =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
freezes on 4.3 was due to bug in aosp jss code, witch have been fixed in 4.3.1. so update to lastest cm.
and in 4.4 they will continue.
Yeah, I'm running the stable release of 10.2 with ziddley's franco kernel and it's causing issues here and there now. I was hoping they were going to revert back to AOSP. I guess I'll revert back to 10.1 to maintain my desired functionality for now.
Elegant996 said:
Yeah, I'm running the stable release of 10.2 with ziddley's franco kernel and it's causing issues here and there now. I was hoping they were going to revert back to AOSP. I guess I'll revert back to 10.1 to maintain my desired functionality for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
opssemnik said:
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, unless there's some way to get touch2wake working on 10.2; I heard you have gamma settings now with the caf kernel included so I figure I can maintain my color scheme.
Elegant996 said:
Yeah, unless there's some way to get touch2wake working on 10.2; I heard you have gamma settings now with the caf kernel included so I figure I can maintain my color scheme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try with other kernels.
On CM11 and Cm10.2 try these: 1) Modified franco and faux to work on Cm : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2487246
2) AK has CM exclusive kernel : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2473454
opssemnik said:
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always follow a tutorial to build your own cm from source code and enable module support. In that way you won't be using custom kernels, everything will be cm 100%.
I am using touchcontrol in that way, and I'm quite happy with the results.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
CM11 is great with hells-core. Touch control works, and battery/performance is amazing.
korockinout13 said:
CM11 is great with hells-core. Touch control works, and battery/performance is amazing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been trying to find a link for 15 minutes!
Could you provide me with a link?
Thanks!
myweca said:
I have been trying to find a link for 15 minutes!
Could you provide me with a link?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right in the general section: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495373