Database Users

AnTuTu Benchmark - Post your score

Hey guys,
i think AnTuTu is much more serious Benchmark as Quadrant (just my opinion)
AnTuTu Benchmark Market Link
please, don't start a discussion about, how useful a benchmark is
here you go:
ROM: Oxygen 2.3.2
Kernel: franco.kernel 13/11
liveOC: 110
gov: lazy
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
beamed in from my Nexus S on Oxygen using my brain

Here you go, Oxygen 2.3.2 as well.
Sent from my Nexus S

Sorry about the off-topic, but what font is that?

Carbon Rom
Franco 1311 on demand 110/880 undervolted
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

Running the matrix. No oc.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Cm7
Matrix 10.5 cfs
1st run 1000mhz on demand
2nd 1300mhz performance
Only ran it once at each frequency after downloading the app

I attached from my 1300 run

Lord-Anubis said:
Sorry about the off-topic, but what font is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who's font?
beamed in from my Nexus S on Oxygen using my brain

Your font.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App

CM7
Matrix 9.0
Voltage Control: 1300
Gov: On Demand

ok , mine is much lower ...
MIUI brainmaster 1.11.11 + franco 13 NOV
1 GHz + lazy

Oxygen 2.3.2
Matr1x v11 cfs
Live OC 110 1100mhz
Ondemand
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

nexus s
stock, root
Acer a500
civato-flexspeed-r3
Sent from my A500 using xda premium

Cyanogenmod 7.1.0
Whatever kernel it comes with
1.440GHz with ONDEMAND.
Yes I use 1.4ghz as a daily driver. Still get 7 hours of extra heavy use and 22+ with light use. They knocked it out of the ball park with this one.
sent from my Touchwiz'd Nexus S 4g

Device: NS4G
ROM: Latest MIUI
Kernel: latest franco cfs
LiveOC: 110 (Ondemand)

I am on the 9th of NS ranking
Using Trinity 1.544ghz kernel

Lord-Anubis said:
Your font.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sensation Light from UOT Kitchen
New Run:
ROM: Oxygen 2.3.2
Kernel: franco.kernel 11/17
LiveOC: 112
GOV: Lazy
Voltages: stock
beamed in from my Nexus S on Oxygen using my brain

I am font
MultiCulti said:
who's font?
beamed in from my Nexus S on Oxygen using my brain
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

sinik420 said:
I am font
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beamed in from my Nexus S on Oxygen using my brain

REBORN THIS TOPIC!!!!
Share your scores
cm 9 7.0v
trinity t132
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

Highest quadrant score

What is the the highest quadrant score for our phone
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App

ichigogb said:
What is the the highest quadrant score for our phone
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
about 895 using cm7 and its original 1000MHz kernel. tweaked by myself.

1003 with g3mod 3.0 beta 3 with 0kb free problem

ajay.d96 said:
1003 with g3mod 3.0 beta 3 with 0kb free problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cant wait to see what we get with open fimg

PersianSphinx said:
cant wait to see what we get with open fimg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah!!!
ajay: ahhhh!! 2000's to 3000's score and my eyes wide open to see that our phone is in the top first
mr: dont day dream!
ajay:
dev's : @mr, its not a day dream ! ajay is right...

1003?? i think it's so high my with stock rom and g3mod kernel at 1000Mhz was 550

Mostly the quadrant scores are quite the same even if you change rom's/kernels. Yeah there would a difference between cm7 roms and froyo ones but no difference between kyrillos and kyorarom.( correct me if I am wrong)
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium

ak700 said:
Mostly the quadrant scores are quite the same even if you change rom's/kernels. Yeah there would a difference between cm7 roms and froyo ones but no difference between kyrillos and kyorarom.( correct me if I am wrong)
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends.if someone uses tweaked and oc'ed rom the score would be higher than non tweaked.but if someone would use almost same tweaks on the rom that are from the same base,the scores would be higher.the same cannot be said for the roms from different base.
Sent from my galaxy 3 using Cyanogenmod!

ak700 said:
Mostly the quadrant scores are quite the same even if you change rom's/kernels. Yeah there would a difference between cm7 roms and froyo ones but no difference between kyrillos and kyorarom.( correct me if I am wrong)
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your wrong. i got 750+ in kyrillos and about 550 in kyorarom. same kernel. its to do with the tweaks.

As I said.
Sent from my galaxy 3 using Cyanogenmod!

ak700 said:
Mostly the quadrant scores are quite the same even if you change rom's/kernels. Yeah there would a difference between cm7 roms and froyo ones but no difference between kyrillos and kyorarom.( correct me if I am wrong)
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope.. youre absolutely wrong. its only based on the I/O (r/w) performance of it

totally useles thread guys
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sent from Galaxy
Kyrillos' ROM v10 GWK74 beta
powered by
CM7-kernel 1.3 H.V.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

rkoby13 said:
totally useles thread guys
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sent from Galaxy
Kyrillos' ROM v10 GWK74 beta
powered by
CM7-kernel 1.3 H.V.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say border line
Lets see how this one goes

ajay.d96 said:
nope.. youre absolutely wrong. its only based on the I/O (r/w) performance of it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no in my tests it was always the cpu that came short, mind you it was fixed on 1200-1200 g3mod 2.3

713 in Quadrant Standard
713 in Quadrant.
____________
Kyrillos' v9.5
G3MOD 2.3 OC
_____________

My best score is 841 on my ROM - M12-ROM
1000Mhz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Guys no offence..but I get 939 only in 3d
sent from no lag xperia x8 while listening DuBsTeP and having eargasms

DeHuMaNiZeD said:
Guys no offence..but I get 939 only in 3d
sent from no lag xperia x8 while listening DuBsTeP and having eargasms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant lolzzzzzz
Sent from Galaxy
Kyrillos' 9.4 OC

Galaxy Tab 7.7 with ICS benchmarked

As the title said, anybody updating to ICS ever run benchmark on it? Quadrant, SunSpider, antutu, or anything that usually being used to compare 1 devive to another, you name it
My desire for now is padfone, which use snapdragon s4. My previous desire is tab 7.7. since tab 7.7 has ICS now and it would be a fair comparison, i want to know how will tab 7.7 perform now that it had ICS compared to Asus Padfone.
Any information will be appreciated
thanks before

got 3906 from quadrant

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My Tab 7.7 on Antutu
Sent from my GT-P6800 using Tapatalk 2

low score
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Josvaz said:
low score
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What score are where you expecting?
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Here are my scores:
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Thanks a lot for the response
so antutu is roughly the same with snapdragon s4, and quadrant from adinis match up pretty well with htc one x (tegra 3 i presume), even though netbooknews says that padfone got 5k++ on quadrant
its understandable with 1.4ghz and 1.5ghz differences i think
wonder how great would this baby be in jellybean with the whole project butter going on
but in term of performance real life, have you guys ever use snapdragon s4 and compare it to your tab on ics? let's say htc one s or asus padfone
just want a better comparison aside from benchmark
this 7.7 is getting pretty cheap nowadays, so yeah, I'm tempted

6592.

I think someone should post the antutu score of P6800 honeycomb as a control reference. here you go.
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Antutu
total score - 6590
CPU - 3381
GPU - 1475
RAM - 1217
I/O - 517
Quadrant
3944 (just a bit under the asus transformer prime tf201)
Vellamo
1320
Benchmark Pi
468 (lowest score I had)
Sunspider
1881
Browsermark
129450
Nenamark2
42.3 fps which is a tad lower than before I had

Just flashed cm9 and to my surprice I am running a lower score than when I was on ics, very strange
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Stock ics on my p6810 antutu score is 6897.

Could anyone chip in on the difference between benchmark speeds of stock ics and let's say cm9
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

With QuickSilverCM 0.2 CM9.
Sent from my GT-P6800 using XDA Premium HD app

Issues postings new scores, will retry another post.
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Back to ICS from CM9 and these my my new scores.
First one is on ADW Launcher EX
Second one is running TouchWiz
Wonder why these numbers are higher than CM9 when it is supposed to faster than stock ICS
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Quadrant:>4800
nenamark2>50
with tegrak:CPU 1.6/1300.....GPU 400/1075

I know I am dredging up a thread but thought this was relevant since it was rather difficult to find.
Here is a website with a few benchmarks for the SC-01E sold in Japan (running 4.04)
sry, Imma newb so you have to piece it back together, lol! ameblo.jp/ povtc/ entry-11347000784. html
In short:
AnTuTu 2.9.2: 6712
Nenamark 1: 55
Nenamark 2: 35
Quadrant Standard: 3546
Sad

actually... the benchmark can be manipulate... so its not entirely accurate

this is mine, benchmarked, jb stock rom right after update
quadrant 4674
antutu 8489

Post your Galaxy S2 Nenamark2 Scores

This is my Nenamark2 score for my GS2.
CM9+SiyahKernel+Extweaks
Max FPS = 55.1
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Our galaxy s2 can achieve almost the same gpu performance with s3 which has fps ot around 58fps!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Nice! What kernel are you using and gpu voltages?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

rolfer8 said:
Nice! What kernel are you using and gpu voltages?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Siyah with stock XWLPO.
160, 267, 400 with 950, 1000, 1100.. Using conservative + vr.. You heard that right, conservative is has higher fps on quadrant and nenamark2 than on pegasusq
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Lol! Didn't realize that its faster.. Been using conservative before.. It did increase by .5-.8 fps.. Maybe i need to look for a better cpu and gpu settings to achieve higher fps.. But i think its more on the gpu side for Nenamark2. Thanks for the info, will try a different combination..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

rolfer8 said:
Lol! Didn't realize that its faster.. Been using conservative before.. It did increase by .5-.8 fps.. Maybe i need to look for a better cpu and gpu settings to achieve higher fps.. But i think its more on the gpu side for Nenamark2. Thanks for the info, will try a different combination..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bdw, i tried it in cm9/cm10 and it didn't perform as well as stock with the same settings. In cm9/cm10 i use pegasusq instead of conservative.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

50.5. Underclocked 100Mhz to 500Mhz. I got just 5fps less then your best and my battery last +2 days with my GB

rolfer8 said:
Our galaxy s2 can achieve almost the same gpu performance with s3 which has fps ot around 58fps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S3 also has "somewhat" more pixels to push around.

Note 8 quadrant and antutu scores....why not?

Post those screenies here
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 4

janjannsen99 said:
Post those screenies here
...
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your setup, kernel, androidversion etc
getting ~6700 on my 5120 4.2.2 (latest UK version) Rooted with everroot OC to 1600Mhz, so my guess is that you have some other kernel perhaps? =)

Sent from my GT-N5110 using xda premium

I used civatos kernel and. Ocd 1.8 and gpu ocd to like 733 I got 60 fps throughout the 3d tests which. I've never got!
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4

janjannsen99 said:
I used civatos kernel and. Ocd 1.8 and gpu ocd to like 733 I got 60 fps throughout the 3d tests which. I've never got!
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My note always got 60 fps with 1.6 ghz and gpu 533
Sent from my GT-N5100 using xda premium

janjannsen99 said:
I used civatos kernel and. Ocd 1.8 and gpu ocd to like 733 I got 60 fps throughout the 3d tests which. I've never got!
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the N5120 (LTE) so it will probably take a while before i find a descent kernel that isnt stock.. still somewhat strange that I get like 1K less points than you guys
Guess it has to do with the GPU, as i havnt touched its clockspeeds at all.

janjannsen99 said:
I used civatos kernel and. Ocd 1.8 and gpu ocd to like 733 I got 60 fps throughout the 3d tests which. I've never got!
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you OC the GPU with civatos kernel? I tried to do it with the trickster app but i dont get all the thresholding stuff xD

I have the donate version maybe that's the difference. I think donate unlocks some features
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4

Adriangbba6 said:
My note always got 60 fps with 1.6 ghz and gpu 533
Sent from my GT-N5100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I just found out that even though I set my gpu to 733 the kernel will not support that frequency. It goes back to 533. So. I guess the only thing over clocked was the cpu....sorry lol. I jist learned this today after reading civatos post on his kernel completely.
And this is directed at the guy thinking over what kernel he should use. There's. One answer
Civatos storm kernel. By far the best.
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 4

I get a shade under 8,000 on quadrant and 19, xxx with antutu.

Antutu, bone stock...21417 points...how are some people here only getting 19xxx

I can't get my Quadrant scores anywhere near that high, even with an overclock. Mind you, I'm only overclocking the CPU by 200MHz, not the GPU. Even with a CPU at 1.8GHz my Quadrant is still only 5,900
EDIT: Go figure, I run the Quadrant test again and this time I get a score of 7430. My Note just wanted to give me a hard time it seems

My antutu score is 21217. Huge upgrade from the 16000 that I was getting when on 4.1. Looks like the upgrade to 4.2 was worth it.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using xda app-developers app

Now after the 4.4.2 kitkat upgrade my score is 21661
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app

100% stock rooted.
N5110 4.4.2

All stock

Civato ROM v 2.1 & latest kernel. .

Got about 28k antutu score, so impressed. It is close to s4
Using latest civatos kernel, oc'd to 1920mhz and decreased voltage about -50mv
Sent from my GT-N5110 using XDA mobile app