Same Tab, same price, but it includes a keyboard now and USB adapter.
Anyone know what keyboard it is?
Based on the picture of the packaging, it looks like a Samsung keyboard that allows you to dock the tablet in portrait mode.
How much for the keyboard, alone?
Sent from my GT-P3100 using xda app-developers app
This is not done.....we are in loss...
Samsung must take care of all users...
And author edit your post that samsung is also giving away usb adapter.........
imnuts said:
Based on the picture of the packaging, it looks like a Samsung keyboard that allows you to dock the tablet in portrait mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, seriously? I have already searched. As of yesterday there's no keyboard listed on Samsung's site as being compatible with this tab. I haven't searched the forum as the article was just released yesterday.
Really? Why even comment at all. If you didn't like the thread, just move along.
Droidlover123 said:
This is not done.....we are in loss...
Samsung must take care of all users...
And author edit your post that samsung is also giving away usb adapter.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I was really just conceivconcerned abbot the keyboard since I haven't found or anywhere for sale. The adapter however idea listed on their site for sale as being compatible.
RaViCa said:
Dude, seriously? I have already searched. As of yesterday there's no keyboard listed on Samsung's site as being compatible with this tab. I haven't searched the forum as the article was just released yesterday.
Really? Why even comment at all. If you didn't like the thread, just move along.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is an official Samsung keyboard. Why would you ask a question and then give a completely unwarranted, nasty response, that not only does nothing for this thread, but makes no sense. When did he say anything that related to him insulting you or hating on this thread? Why would Samsung release an official bundle with a keyboard that looks exactly like an official one, but is not the official one? Maybe they didn't release the accessory to force people to buy the bundle? Just because it isn't on their site doesn't mean it isn't coming in the bundle.
Ah crap! Apologies to everyone and especially to imnuts. I checked this thread this morning on my phone and for some reason the only thing I saw was the what was typed in the signature which is just a couple of links to search engine and actually thought it was his post to me. I was really baffled by it at first. But was like why this guy doesn't think I at least searched around about it at first before I posted anything.
Basically I asked a question (and thought) he replied with search engine links. If you click on the links you may see why it bothered me a little and didn't understand why he would post anything at all if that was all he had to say. But now that I am actually on a PC I see his post in its entirety and realize it was just his signature.
So again, I sincerely apologize.
However I did find this keyboard available at foreign website. I'm guessing Hong Kong. I also noticed tha tabs on that site are white.
RaViCa said:
Ah crap! Apologies to everyone and especially to imnuts. I checked this thread this morning on my phone and for some reason the only thing I saw was the what was typed in the signature which is just a couple of links to search engine and actually thought it was his post to me. I was really baffled by it at first. But was like why this guy doesn't think I at least searched around about it at first before I posted anything.
Basically I asked a question (and thought) he replied with search engine links. If you click on the links you may see why it bothered me a little and didn't understand why he would post anything at all if that was all he had to say. But now that I am actually on a PC I see his post in its entirety and realize it was just his signature.
So again, I sincerely apologize.
However I did find this keyboard available at foreign website. I'm guessing Hong Kong. I also noticed tha tabs on that site are white.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wow. I got really mad because yeah... Well, thanks for clearing it up! Also I think the tab is white in Asia.
Related
I have heard rumors, but nothing substantiated....and a search is turning up nothing.....
Jimmmycrackcorn said:
I have heard rumors, but nothing substantiated....and a search is turning up nothing.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I keep an eye out for that kind of thing, and I have heard/seen nothing about that. Although, I do believe there were a number of new Android builds for the HD2 that came out right about then, are you sure it wasn't one of those that you heard about?
sirphunkee said:
I keep an eye out for that kind of thing, and I have heard/seen nothing about that. Although, I do believe there were a number of new Android builds for the HD2 that came out right about then, are you sure it wasn't one of those that you heard about?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read about it on the T-mobile forums. The person in question also stated that it was up on this website, but now the thread and all links have been removed/deleted.
Conspiracy?!?
Or BS???
Jimmmycrackcorn said:
I read about it on the T-mobile forums. The person in question also stated that it was up on this website, but now the thread and all links have been removed/deleted.
Conspiracy?!?
Or BS???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah if they pulled the thread and the links, I'd assume that someone called bs on it and they did what we would do here, and just trashed it. It's possible to that it was in reference to the release of some specific ROM (or ROM build) on that date, but my guess is that it was just someone trying to stir up trouble...you'd be surprised how often people actually do that in this type of environment
sirphunkee said:
Yeah if they pulled the thread and the links, I'd assume that someone called bs on it and they did what we would do here, and just trashed it. It's possible to that it was in reference to the release of some specific ROM (or ROM build) on that date, but my guess is that it was just someone trying to stir up trouble...you'd be surprised how often people actually do that in this type of environment
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, they quoted that the links were directly from HTC....not uploaded to this site or some other site. I'd post the link, but I'm not sure if that is kosher on this site (or the other).
Jimmmycrackcorn said:
Yeah, they quoted that the links were directly from HTC....not uploaded to this site or some other site. I'd post the link, but I'm not sure if that is kosher on this site (or the other).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just looked over HTC's official support pages for the HD2, and I don't seen any new updates of any type, not that recently anyway. If you have the link you can PM it to me and I'll check it out real quick and see if it's 1) valid, and 2) ok to post here.
sirphunkee said:
I just looked over HTC's official support pages for the HD2, and I don't seen any new updates of any type, not that recently anyway. If you have the link you can PM it to me and I'll check it out real quick and see if it's 1) valid, and 2) ok to post here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your inbox
K thanks Jimmy, I looked over the thread you sent from t-mobile's forums, and there's no problem posting the link here as far as I know (I'll post it below myself, just in case). But after reading it all I also couldn't find anything more substantial than just what that one member was reporting...which was just mostly that he'd seen "something" on HTC's site related to an update, that was supposedly later pulled down.
I'll note too that any updates for the US T-Mobile version of the HD2 wouldn't come from HTC's site anyway, they're only ever released (officially) through the T-Mobile support page for the phone. So, it's quite possible that even if there IS an update about to be released, it might only be for the euro version of the phone...and since official ROM updates always include a radio, it would likely be incompatible with the US model (i.e. it would brick any one that it was flashed to).
Here's the T-Mobile thread it was mentioned in:
http://forums.t-mobile.com/t5/HTC-HD2/new-update/td-p/459563
backlight buttons used for notifications on the i9000
i remember seeing this before in the theme and apps section and it got ruled out for the vibrant because of kernel issues i think it was... but they figured it out for the i9000, so i hope we can see this on our phone... soon.
btw... please dont flame and tell me this is in the wrong thread, because it will get more views here... and its in this section of the i9000 thread.
If you build it. they will come
Try this, it works like a charm: http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.led.notify
thanks... ive seen that in the market... but unless theyve changed the battery drain and the using home button to power the phone back up... it doesnt feel like a complete solution. atleast for me...
Michaelr219 said:
thanks... ive seen that in the market... but unless theyve changed the battery drain and the using home button to power the phone back up... it doesnt feel like a complete solution. atleast for me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well the source is there from the i9000 build, sounds like you need to get to work to fit your needs.
oh and it's in the development section in the i9000 section because there is DEVELOPMENT done, unless you plan on doing something this should go in the Q&A section.
flame on!
Who cares if its in the wrong section or not? If everyone posted crap like that then nothing would get done with our phone so take that **** elsewhere. Anyway back to the topic at hand, just reading over the first post it seems as tho the dev who made that is willing to port it to other Galaxy S phones. Anyone try contacting him yet?
rsfaze said:
well the source is there from the i9000 build, sounds like you need to get to work to fit your needs.
oh and it's in the development section in the i9000 section because there is DEVELOPMENT done, unless you plan on doing something this should go in the Q&A section.
flame on!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
woww! a fantastic 4 reference...
youre sooooo clever
ive never heard anyone use that out of context like that before
what a clever clever girl you are
i know how these threads work.
and in case you havent noticed!!!
the i9000 is a GALAXY S,
now look at the back of your phone
it probably says GALAXY S
hmmmm... soo strange how that works.
it isnt my fault that samsung decided to put
out 5 different versions of almost the same
effing phone.
i do my part for the community anyway i can,
and i know as well as anyone else, the q and a
section doesnt get as much attention... so,
hopefully this thread will bring to life some actual
development since this can and should be port-able
id do it myself, but obviously i cant...
which is why i posted.
Genesis1791 said:
Who cares if its in the wrong section or not? If everyone posted crap like that then nothing would get done with our phone so take that **** elsewhere. Anyway back to the topic at hand, just reading over the first post it seems as tho the dev who made that is willing to port it to other Galaxy S phones. Anyone try contacting him yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes... waiting for a response... i hope curio or jac are already aware of this and adding it to there kernels... it seems like a no brainer that this could be useful to anyone...
Michaelr219 said:
woww! a fantastic 4 reference...
youre sooooo clever
ive never heard anyone use that out of context like that before
what a clever clever girl you are
I'm a dude
i know how these threads work.
and in case you havent noticed!!!
the i9000 is a GALAXY S,
now look at the back of your phone
it probably says GALAXY S
The i9000 is a variation of the Galaxy S just as the Vibrant, Epic and so on are. Each may be similar but no two are alike, if they were you wouldn't be here requesting someone do something you are too lazy to figure out and learn yourself. And yes it's strange how THAT works.
hmmmm... soo strange how that works.
it isnt my fault that samsung decided to put
out 5 different versions of almost the same
effing phone.
Is it anyones fault? There is plenty of documentation available on android and there is the source for this project, why not contribute?
i do my part for the community anyway i can,
and i know as well as anyone else, the q and a
section doesnt get as much attention... so,
hopefully this thread will bring to life some actual
development since this can and should be port-able
id do it myself, but obviously i cant...
which is why i posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do your part by not being one of the members that purposely posts things in the wrong section. If the moderators did not feel the need for separate sections we would have one general forum.
And the reason the Q&A section doesn't get "much" attention is because people like you refuse to post there.. why would someone looks there if you continue to post here?
Change the thread title to include [Think Tank] then he can't complain anymore.
Genesis1791 said:
Change the thread title to include [Think Tank] then he can't complain anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posts like this and we wonder why people respond at all
rsfaze said:
Posts like this and we wonder why people respond at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because people like you are on a high horse... you arent a mod.
you arent the xda police. id just like to bring it to an experienced persons attention who could do it faster than it would take me to learn. why? cause i work and have a life that doesnt completely revolve around xda.
so why dont you go flame someone elses thread little lady... as you can see, there are some ppl here that would like to accomplish the same thing id like to see. which is to get more functionality out of my phone, since it is obviously possible on other "similar" models.
to the mods. if im out of line.
pardon me.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=772698
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=766880
how many threads do we need to create about the same request/idea?
rsfaze said:
Posts like this and we wonder why people respond at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Isn't the whole point behind a Think Tank to get people in here and try and get development done? Hmm seems to fit this thread perfectly. So what exactly is the problem now?
Edit: That configurable backlight timeout thread has nothing to do with this topic, It's a separate topic that in no way involves using the backlights as notifications. The other thread isn't a Think Tank so go flame in that one if your that hell bent on being useless to getting this to work on our phones.
Genesis1791 said:
Really? Isn't the whole point behind a Think Tank to get people in here and try and get development done? Hmm seems to fit this thread perfectly. So what exactly is the problem now?
Edit: That configurable backlight timeout thread has nothing to do with this topic, It's a separate topic that in no way involves using the backlights as notifications. The other thread isn't a Think Tank so go flame in that one if your that hell bent on being useless to getting this to work on our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lolololol... im done replying to him.
i bet as soon as this is released for the vibrant.
he'll be the first one in here dl'ing it...
hes the threads biggest fan soo far, what are
we at now? like 5 replys already...
soo rsfaze, take your little links and shove em up your think tank...
this thread doesnt need your negativity.
rsfaze said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=772698
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=766880
how many threads do we need to create about the same request/idea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh... btw... smart guy... look where your links were posted
Michaelr219 said:
lolololol... im done replying to him.
i bet as soon as this is released for the vibrant.
he'll be the first one in here dl'ing it...
hes the threads biggest fan soo far, what are
we at now? like 5 replys already...
soo rsfaze, take your little links and shove em up your think tank...
this thread doesnt need your negativity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's a shame when someone takes the time to show you that what you posted has been done twice now but instead of bumping one of the old threads you create another one.
What was I for thinking about the actual guidelines around here.
Good day
p.s. yes smart guy posted here and still not anything done.. I feel like I should be smacking my head on the desk right now while typing to you.
rsfaze said:
it's a shame when someone takes the time to show you that what you posted has been done twice now but instead of bumping one of the old threads you create another one.
What was I for thinking about the actual guidelines around here.
Good day
p.s. yes smart guy posted here and still not anything done.. I feel like I should be smacking my head on the desk right now while typing to you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
embrace those feelings, sir.
Guys if you really want to see this in 2.2 instead of arguing do what I did and shoot this idea over to samsung!
SE7EN- said:
Guys if you really want to see this in 2.2 instead of arguing do what I did and shoot this idea over to samsung!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sounds like a great idea... i guess im just hoping for an update.zip or apk possibly... like in the other thread... so that we can unlock this feature with ANY rom... but im glad to see people taking proactive steps... ill be sure to mention it on the samsung website...
sorry for the negativity previously in this thread... its just kind of sad to throw a disclaimer up, only to find someone try to tear it down... its unnecessarily negative when the out come of this thread is supposed to be positive.
Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This......
SuperFly03 said:
This......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely this.
I read all post lol, but I need to do this question, Im always an Iphone user (tmobile network) I bought this G2, I keep reading that cant be root for now, I change it today because got blackout twices....
I dont know what the hell works the root thing.. Just an advices, should keep my G2? or wait for another android phone...
Still have 13 days for return
d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
care to elaborate?
s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you? lol...
AndroidNoober said:
Can you? lol...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?
s30zgt said:
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I know my English is bad.. Is my second language.. I just trying to understand a little bit about this.. Spanish pages are from Mexico or Spain, harder to understand!!!
Like I said, sorry about that.
s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.
krayshunist said:
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks man lol. I don't need your asinine comments that bring nothing to this thread. Mods please close this thread.
Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
People are being jerks for sure, but OP, you should search better cuz your question has been answered in several threads. The short of it is NO. It is not a bug in the sense you are thinking. It is an intentional bug which tricks linux (android os) into thinking writes to the system files during root are being made when in actuality, the writes are only being written to cache. Once the cache is cleared during reboot the root access is erased because it wasn't actually written to the system in the first place. It's not a bug that needs to be fixed. It's a bug that was placed there to fool the system and make permanent root more...challenging.
Wiki
s30zgt said:
Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a very informational Wiki out. Check it out. It will get you up to date with all the work that has been done towards root.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/index.php?title=HTC_Vision#Rooting_the_G2
The important part of the question.. for me.. is whether the Z has the same bugFeature.
I see one random user saying that they flashed a G2 rom on a Desire Z and nothing more. Have I missed something? Kinda hard to say yay or nay based solely on that.
"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Thank you XfooYen for the info. I did a quick search before I posted(the posting page even searches similar post before you publish them) and found nothing similar. I will make sure to search more thoroughly next time.
I am familiar with the current situation with root, I just though that if a well known developer like cyanogen thinks that its a bug that maybe the readers of xda might want to discuss his possible ratonale for such a statement, then again that may not have been what he was trying to say and got it misrepresented by the media. Instead I saw nothing but irrelevent and pointless posts. For a second I thought this was gizmodo or engadget.
Thank you again. Its good to know that xda has readers who actually know what they are talking about and not just the average troll.
androidtoy09 said:
"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you're wrong.
RT @cyanogen: @garok89 yeah, and the statement tmobile made is technically wrong. theres nothing that restores the phone, its actually what i'd call a bug
greengoldmello said:
Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. This is XDA. In the years I've been here, there was never this much flaming and douchery as there has been lately.
Here's a tweet from @Googlemobile:
Our cafes are baking something sweet http://twitpic.com/3682u2 (4 minutes ago via web)
I know i won't be able to install the ota since i'm rooted, but i'm excited nonetheless!
Mo_Nexus said:
Here's a tweet from @Googlemobile:
Our cafes are baking something sweet http://twitpic.com/3682u2 (4 minutes ago via web)
I know i won't be able to install the ota since i'm rooted, but i'm excited nonetheless!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did this honestly need another thread?
Oh ****! Not another thread about Gingerbread!!!
This is getting so old...
Oh no, not another complaint about another thread!
Relax, it's not like i'm killing trees or taking up space by posting this. I didn't have time to go through the entire forum just to make sure i didn't hurt your feelings. A popup appeared showing possible similar threads, none of them matched, so i submitted it. No need to cry about it.
Thanks.
Mo_Nexus said:
Oh no, not another complaint about another thread!
Relax, it's not like i'm killing trees or taking up space by posting this. I didn't have time to go through the entire forum just to make sure i didn't hurt your feelings. A popup appeared showing possible similar threads, none of them matched, so i submitted it. No need to cry about it.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are about 5 GB threads on the first page. Maybe you should start a few more because it will do a lot of good for all of us.
gibosn6594 said:
There are about 5 GB threads on the first page. Maybe you should start a few more because it will do a lot of good for all of us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure no prob!
To all the complainers, why are you clicking on the threads then?
Mo_Nexus, thanks for the info.
OP, thank you for posting the information. While I wouldn't have created a new thread
myself it still is new news nonetheless so I appreciate it.
Hopefully the mods either lock the excess threads or merge them to de-clutter the forum.
verboten said:
To all the complainers, why are you clicking on the threads then?
Mo_Nexus, thanks for the info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem Verboten, and thank you for the comment, i appreciate it.
verboten said:
To all the complainers, why are you clicking on the threads then?
Mo_Nexus, thanks for the info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because we can't tell from the thread titles exactly what's in the post.
gibosn6594 said:
Because we can't tell from the thread titles exactly what's in the post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand if the thread title was Google announcing Gingerbread!!!
But it's "Google announcing Gingerbread soon?"
With most thread titles, no one can tell exactly whats in the posts.
Just wait for the thread title "Gingerbread is here!!" and click no others than. Simple.
ap3604 said:
OP, thank you for posting the information. While I wouldn't have created a new thread
myself it still is new news nonetheless so I appreciate it.
Hopefully the mods either lock the excess threads or merge them to de-clutter the forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, and i agree, all existing threads should consolidated or something. Hopefully there'll be no need for that if Google stops teasing us & releases 2.3 already.
Cool dude, thanks for the info and welcome this a public forum and everyone share his knowledge, always here like this, when someone post anything even said hi u will see many of the guys here saying sucks comment. THIS IS JUST HOW IT IS. keep going and when u have something to post don't think a lot, JUST POST, if i want to read i will read if i don't i will leave u just thanks
Mo_Nexus said:
No problem, and i agree, all existing threads should consolidated or something. Hopefully there'll be no need for that if Google stops teasing us & releases 2.3 already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is not teasing us, WE DON'T HAVE ANY PATIENCE, and the thing is when Google release the gingerbread we will start complain THIS ALSO JUST HOW IT IS
NICEGYPT said:
Google is not teasing us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually they are teasing with us. they just dont bother their sorry ass to give a proper release date. they just dont even care about to give out an spesifications about the new system. nothing. just some fake news also new screenshots could be fake too. we simply dont know anything about new update. 4 example is the new crappy youtube app staying? what about horrible keyboard?
it just could be stupid update without any new features. also it could be something revolutionary like eclair. but we already knew them BEFORE the eclair released. were just waiting for google's jokes if whole gingerbread is just about some stupid skin and stuff.
korhanes said:
actually they are teasing with us. they just dont bother their sorry ass to give a proper release date. they just dont even care about to give out an spesifications about the new system. nothing. just some fake news also new screenshots could be fake too. we simply dont know anything about new update. 4 example is the new crappy youtube app staying? what about horrible keyboard?
it just could be stupid update without any new features. also it could be something revolutionary like eclair. but we already knew them BEFORE the eclair released. were just waiting for google's jokes if whole gingerbread is just about some stupid skin and stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please tell me english isn't your native language, I'll totally understand then. Anyhow Google have 0 commitment to providing us with pre-release info. It's *UNRELEASED* therefore they could deny the existence of GB itself and are completely within their right to do so. These little bits of info like not so secretive tweets are just a bit of fun, surely I'm not the only one who likes the suspense/surprise regarding the lack of GB info?
...but just in case y'all haven't seen it.
On the Acer site under Tab / Iconia tab / A500 / Documents
App. Guide
Acer kernel source code (for Android 3.2 HoneyComb)
1.0
95.9 MB
2011/10/04
Achristocat said:
...but just in case y'all haven't seen it.
On the Acer site under Tab / Iconia tab / A500 / Documents
App. Guide
Acer kernel source code (for Android 3.2 HoneyComb)
1.0
95.9 MB
2011/10/04
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. Very old news, but thanks for posting and not using the search function.
Actually, I did / always do a search...
..and when I posted the new topic, it ALSO does a search for you to list similar topics but nothing came up there either...SO...
Erring on the side of wanting to help I posted anyway...
Sorry to have taken up so much of your precious time and I promise to do my best not to help as much as possible again...
Achristocat said:
..and when I posted the new topic, it ALSO does a search for you to list similar topics but nothing came up there either...SO...
Erring on the side of wanting to help I posted anyway...
Sorry to have taken up so much of your precious time and I promise to do my best not to help as much as possible again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess "help" is a relative word then. Clogging up forums with topics that have already been posted time, and time again is not "help" as fast as most people are concerned.
When searching remember that there are more than one sub-forums for the A500 that you can search at the same time.
Achristocat said:
..and when I posted the new topic, it ALSO does a search for you to list similar topics but nothing came up there either...SO...
Erring on the side of wanting to help I posted anyway...
Sorry to have taken up so much of your precious time and I promise to do my best not to help as much as possible again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meh, just blow it off. If you think this section is bad, be glad that you didn't post something in the Moto Atrix forum. It's even worse over there.
Seems like this site gets more and more full of users on one month old accounts with 1000 posts posting non-helpful replies. Who gives a **** if it was already posted? Why didn't you just stay out of the thread since you already knew this?
Letting it go...
yup...yes I am...No worries. If I didn't want to get verbally assaulted every once in a blue moon, I wouldn't post
...but on the off chance someone didn't see it and it could help...I'll take the chance Every Time...and even when I do know how to search and use search quite a lot, Every Once in a while search does not turn up the exact phrase or wording or whatever. Sooo...
ANYWAY...
Letting go while knowing that 99.9999 percent of the people here Really Do want to help...
At least I'm not asking about root for 3.2 right?
mikel81 said:
Seems like this site gets more and more full of users on one month old accounts with 1000 posts posting non-helpful replies. Who gives a **** if it was already posted? Why didn't you just stay out of the thread since you already knew this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says the 9 post wonder
Achristocat said:
yup...yes I am...No worries. If I didn't want to get verbally assaulted every once in a blue moon, I wouldn't post
...but on the off chance someone didn't see it and it could help...I'll take the chance Every Time...and even when I do know how to search and use search quite a lot, Every Once in a while search does not turn up the exact phrase or wording or whatever. Sooo...
ANYWAY...
Letting go while knowing that 99.9999 percent of the people here Really Do want to help...
At least I'm not asking about root for 3.2 right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been following this forum fairly regularly since I got my tab in May and I had not seen it so it was useful for me. Thanks...
kjy2010 said:
Says the 9 post wonder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says the forum spammer.
Give it a rest, please? The guy wanted to help, and he's been a member WAY longer than you. Post count is irrelevant.
rg1003 said:
I've been following this forum fairly regularly since I got my tab in May and I had not seen it so it was useful for me. Thanks...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since we apparently have a bunch of children that don't know how to use the search function in this forum, here you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1276753&highlight=source+code
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273640&highlight=source+code
kjy2010 said:
Since we apparently have a bunch of children that don't know how to use the search function in this forum, here you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1276753&highlight=source+code
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273640&highlight=source+code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only child here is you having a hissy fit over nothing.
stoney73 said:
The only child here is you having a hissy fit over nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huggs and kisses guys.
posting to this,saying its already posted is as bad if not worse then the thread itself as far as spam goes.
Oops I just did it too.
Sorry my friends seeing you bicker over this makes me cry.
More huggs needed.
I know my post was not needed.