I found this tread that makes an install of Linux on every mobilephone, could this be usefull?? I am not a developer but I think this thing belongs to Development, if not I am sorry and ask mods to move this.
So what you want to do is install webtop as a linux OS on the atrix?
I think its not posible...but maybe Im wrong
from the (m)ATRIX...
Quote from that thread:
This projects aim is to bring a range of linux distros to your android device through a method known as 'chroot',
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, this is already available for the Atrix's webtop since forever ago, through debian chroot (and possibly webtop2sd).
ravilov said:
Quote from that thread:
As far as I know, this is already available for the Atrix's webtop since forever ago, through debian chroot (and possibly webtop2sd).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a project working on also other devices w/o webtop functionality, maybe it could help in having webtop in cyanogenmod and other custom ROM builted from sources!
gianluca.tomat said:
Since this is a project working on also other devices w/o webtop functionality, maybe it could help in having webtop in cyanogenmod and other custom ROM builted from sources!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its been done, over a year now. here Just root and install this.
Djazin said:
Its been done, over a year now. here Just root and install this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but I posted the link here so that maybe some devs could possibly integrate it into a ROM so that when you connect the phone to tv/dock it boots automatically into linux distro!
It doesn't work like that. You have to actually start the hardware side of things on the tegra2 chip, it has nothing to do with the chroot linux distro, which is very old news (and all the devs know about it). What you essentially have to do is code the x session to send itself over the seperate hdmi output frame buffer, which also has to be triggered and deactivated properly.
No developer has been interested in really trying it. Jokersax was working on it at one point in CM9, but scrapped it due to upstream changes that broke his code.
This doesn't really belong in this section, and I've given you the actual reason why there's more to this than you think. Also, as I said, everyone knows about running linux on android in this fashion, as it's a very old project at this point.
Yup, chroot methods won't help a bit
I believe that webtop on cm is something that Samcripp is still trying to make work...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29376000
When the official ICS comes out, we just might have webtop on cyanogenmod
;29914961 said:
Yup, chroot methods won't help a bit
I believe that webtop on cm is something that Samcripp is still trying to make work...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29376000
When the official ICS comes out, we just might have webtop on cyanogenmod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe yes maybe no, because CM7 which is based on gingerbread (we do have official gingerbread) still dont have webtop integration...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Ok sorry guys!
bimasakti85 said:
Maybe yes maybe no, because CM7 which is based on gingerbread (we do have official gingerbread) still dont have webtop integration...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The gingerbread webtop is a hack by Motorola. Even tho is a linux distribution its tightly woven into android libraries. This libraries without source can't be added into cm7.
Cm9 is different. Ics is capable of switching to tablet mode. Offering a better option than just plain locked down linux. We shall see.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
there is gentop2
search it
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Related
dell 0000000000000
dell 00000000000
reserve 2 ---
Shweet!!!!! If I knew how to code..I would surely help you!(If you have anything easy to work on..do tell )
I will die for it IceCream!!! the camera speed is so fast..
Using Gingerbread as a base presumably?
Given the amount of "non-standard" hardware in the SGS2, you'll need support libs from either an existing non-AOSP OEM firmware, or from CM7 won't you?
great.. i hope u will port in a bunch of days
it's so great.you can do it!
tongqihua said:
it's so great.you can do it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no he can't. There isn't a FULL system dump of the Galaxy Nexus yet. There is only the dump from the SDK. He will probably theme it like Ice Cream Sandwich. Anyways good luck to the dev
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
LuffyPSP said:
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not the point. Of course, a dump would be a lot better. But being the first to port and get a working SDK rom... Now that's where the fun is
It is possible, we have the full SDK ROM.
Ask galnet how you import proprietary files with dependencies
Sent from my GT-I9100
I am working on it!
I am very newbie but we can do something
May the force be with you.. And make it fast cause i am getting itchy already hahaha... Goodluck.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Face lockscreen already in SGS2 but not enabled
I can help you!!
hobbit19 said:
hello Friends
I started work porting IceCreamSandwich SDK port on the Samsung Galaxy S II
Details very soon!!
if there are developers willing to help me write a personal message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great!!!
10chars
I for one don't see this working as every device seems to be getting the same LibC error at the moment (except for some reason the G2).
The best hope seems to be getting a HC rom to work then using the boot.img from that to boot the ICS sdk port. (this is what we believe happened with the G2 to get it to boot)
I would be satisfied with the new gmail application including widget
Cheers!
Looking to try .Hope you have a great ICS.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I've just seen the news about onskreen going multitasking,,,,,,went to download,,,,,,,,,,,but really I don't know what to download and how to use it on my TF101G
As far as i know:
Cornerstone is no app as you understand it. It is something like a "launcher".
The problem is that cornerstone has to be integrated into the os by the manufacturer himself because it has to be integrated deeply into the os.
So you won't see cornerstone on tablets unless a manufacturer decides to implement it.
Or someone takes the AOSP code from google and releases a complete rom. But i think that would be a lot of work. I don't think that someone would do this. It would be awesome to see this im cyanogenmod^^. I mean both are open source now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I think I saw someone with a Xoom that has it.. (from Reddit). It would be awesome if we got it too.. I need to learn to make roms in my spare time.
it has to be baked into the rom its not a apk u run
I would love to try this too !
The "simple" way would be to get source from a rom, to integrate it and build the rom. But the integration step is unfortunatly not simply I think :/
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
asdfuogh said:
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First ICS has to come out. Then we will gather our forces, go on our knees and humbly ask any dev to face the challenge and coock rom with Onskreen integrated. It will not be soon, but someday ... Hope never dies...
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Vyrlokar said:
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Steve Kondid stated he will work to get it into CM9 (that's if it come to the TF).
He has it running on his 10.1
"fat__tire: Just for fun... http://t.co/gLBPGYMW Sorta buggy but sorta cool. #nookcolor #cm9 #cornerstone"
--http://twitter.com/fat__tire/status/169628187347783681
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
cmarticus said:
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First we need a stable custom rom then we need a normal version and a cornerstone version patience is a virtue
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
^^ what he said but the expand on that we need a rom that is fully deodexed or one that has a full source code available so that it can be baked in without signature errors + we need a apk dev and a rom dev (Or one that can do both) to put it all together
Our Tegra 2 is the AP20H board right? Well other than MOTO specific drivers like finger print reader/webtop shouldn't this help in making a full port with everything working like full acceleration and the like? http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9103_galaxy_r-3967.php It has the same board and has official ICS. Sorry if this is a repost, just trying to help the cause.
We need a new kernel, the drivers alone don't help us.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app
Yeh this has been looked at already =/
We do have the drivers needed, but we don't have a compatible kernel, as I've said many times. We can only get the kernel from Motorola.
Sent from my #Motofail... No further Plans coming...
Or we can try to develop kernel from source of another AP20H devices.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1917591
Zeljko1234 said:
Or we can try to develop kernel from source of another AP20H devices.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1917591
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. We need to make our own kernel to get these drivers to work.
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Porting info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
Our device is WIP (Work in Progress): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
tpr0 said:
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Once the source code is release, porting will be rolling here
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets hope its compatible with tegra2. I have a windows 8 tablet with real windows, but ubuntu on my atrix i dont say no i hope the experience is good like on the desktop ubuntu.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
harszeee said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea because it's not really a proof that it is working for our tegra phone. it's a lot different so u have to find a phone that has the same specs this but there is no one.
let's see if it will work for us that would be awesome
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
harszeee said:
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, he identifies the device about 10 seconds or so in, but admittedly if he didn't the only other way to identify it would be process of elimination, looking at the logo's and figuring it out that way.
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
DowJonesARG said:
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please don't force the devs to support our phone. just let the image release si the devs can see the source code and the system. After that we can ask to import the os to the atrix if it's possible.
Just be patience.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Sorry is just my nerves speaking. Hope to see it in action soon.
Enviado desde mi Atrix4G
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
wildchild048 said:
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah tomorrow is porting lesson can the thread maker update and copy this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting in? so the people who are intersted can hangout too so we get more people
Do you have, or may be adapted upload released today? ubuntu can only hope that this is no longer
It's released and port lessons are there xD Let's hope it works on atrix
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Let's hope epinter can work his magic and port this for us.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
So no devs are interested?
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
please install atrix 4g
rjayflo said:
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this will be fully working without an ICS Kernel.
I think an effort like this worths a try, since we can aways update the userspace ubuntu packages, keeping the old kernel. I don't see why the old gingerbread kernel wouldn't work.
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com