Ohai , Yesterday my mother bought a Samsung Galaxy Mini 2 for her , http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_mini_2_s6500-3883.php , and it has Qualcomm MSM7227 , i was testing with antutu and 3d score was outstanding 907 score for a 800 mhz processor , so i took the adreno 200 libs from it . Sadly i end with a soft brick after i installed them . Here they are , maybe devs can mod them and work on our phone.
Its because galaxy mini 2 is armv7
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Ppl shoud stop comparing phones with different procesors...
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Closed
Related
I'm sure you guys hate me by now but I have another question. On the vibrant I got alot better 3d and 2d results on quadrant. Alot ov you are going go say quadrant doesnt matter but still... So does the vibrant have a better gpu? I know on the custom kernals they removed the fps cap with some kind of hack.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
Yes. I do recall reading about vibrant having better gpu.
As for scores, put two phones side by side and actually use them to see if there's much of difference.
[via XDA app]
No I will agree the mytouch is alot smoother. But the cpu is better tho.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
Yes, samsung galaxy s's use a hummingbird processor, which uses the PowerVR SGX540 which is better than the adreno 205 found on the mytouch's 2nd Gen snapdragon.
Sent from my myTouch 4G using XDA App
Ive been offered to swap my x10 for a samsung galaxy ace, im wondering wether or not its worth it since the ace is only 1 year old?
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
whitest0rm said:
Ive been offered to swap my x10 for a samsung galaxy ace, im wondering wether or not its worth it since the ace is only 1 year old?
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its having MT,16M but cpu is weaker than x10
ace 800Mhz
sahibunlimited said:
Its having MT,16M but cpu is weaker than x10
ace 800Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And RAM 128MB
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Sisters ace wont even play angry birds. Or allow adobe flash.
Kieron
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Ace display resolution is 320x480 (X10 - 480x852), photo is better in X10. RAM - 384 MB like X10.
Ace is worse than X10 at all.
why swap for a ARMv6 phone? many of my friends using it and they are complaining it! And it even lags when playing angry birds, but our x10 still can handle some HD games, no way you can compare X10 to Ace...
Now if it was x10 for galaxy s, I'd say go for it
scoobysnacks said:
Now if it was x10 for galaxy s, I'd say go for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree! And in Malaysia, Ace is having a same price tag with Mini, Mini Pro, Live with walkman. All of them using the MSM8255, which is superior to MSM7227, in every way.
hon kin said:
Totally agree! And in Malaysia, Ace is having a same price tag with Mini, Mini Pro, Live with walkman. All of them using the MSM8255, which is superior to MSM7227, in every way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah definitely that is what my current incredible s has...
You can overclock to 2ghz no problem, and the graphics performance of the adreno 205 is fantastic.
my answer is : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MLry6Cn_D4
First Geekbench results of Apples new Wonder-Phone:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1030202
And btw. ist no where near a A15 inside the Iphone 5, it's ARM v7.
Galaxy S3 does 1600 in Geekbench Stock, too. No overclocking, no nothing.
boba
common stop creating threads with iphone 5. It is s3 forum and it was already discussed about iphone5 vs s3...
Yawn....
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
We have a new general thread in general to post all things drivel related
Then go to iPhone-devs.com and post their because no-one cares here
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1889453
General Thread
I am actually interested in such comparisons
Mods have closed down similar threads and their gonna close this one too, it's a waste of time
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Cool, I'm in before it gets locked.
Yada-yada-yada,who the f.. cares about ibla
zodiaxe66 said:
Yada-yada-yada,who the f.. cares about ibla
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iDo.........
Not!
©®™
In before locked
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
It is still not locked
I'm in!!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Seems the iPhone 5 is only running at 1.02Ghz.
The iphone 5 dual core is faster than our quadcore. Search for new benchmarks in google -.-
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
If it's not fake then good work for the benchmark until Jellybean for S3 arrives
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1026099
Still S3 outperforms Iphone5 :good:
And Iphone 5 will only use that for the gaming applications because their homescreen is so basic (No widgets and true multitasking), so to summarize it's still a useless upgrade.. I'd rather buy a Ps vita/nintendo DS for gaming if the main focus of apple products is to improve the hardware for gaming.
wicked1683 said:
If it's not fake then good work for the benchmark until Jellybean for S3 arrive
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1026099
Still S3 outperforms Iphone5 :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4 Cores at 1.4Ghz should win out over 2 Cores at 1Ghz. But by a lot more than that.
spoxone said:
The iphone 5 dual core is faster than our quadcore. Search for new benchmarks in google -.-
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing that pulls the iPhone 5 benchmark scores higher is memory bandwidth.... The s3's cpu scores substantially higher.
spoxone said:
The iphone 5 dual core is faster than our quadcore. Search for new benchmarks in google -.-
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it's only an ARM v7 then it can't outperform ours because ours are ARM v9's (international s3's dunno about American etc)
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Speechless after Reading Snapdragon 800 / 600,
Samsung probably won't implement this on their next Flagship; but wouldn't the Snapdragon 800/600 outperform the Exynos 5 processors? This is crazy, but mobile technology is making long strides. :laugh:
Maybe but no one will be able to touch the unique and innovative software and tw ux
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Well, CNET says the 800 would be coming to mobile devices (mobile phones as well) in Q2 of this year.
Im loving the News From The Guys Who Make Snapdragon Processors, they clocked some of the newer ones at 2,3 Ghz (Possibly NOT Overclocked ^__^)
Octa Core in Note 3 will do
Handschriftlich von meinem Note 2 gesendet
I guess you didn't hear about the Exynos 5 chip..
8 cores...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
YoungAceAtlanta said:
I guess you didn't hear about the Exynos 5 chip..
8 cores...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And they eats your beloved battery mate!
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
optimusjeet said:
And they eats your beloved battery mate!
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they don't! You probably didn't even read about it!!!!!!
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
optimusjeet said:
And they eats your beloved battery mate!
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And snapdragon doesnt eats your battery? Lol......
Ever heard of big.LITTLE.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
big.little and octa core are same............2 quad cores ARM SoC attached back-back...one A7 quad core for simple tasks and another A15 quadcore for heavy stuff...battery consumtion has been reported to be way low than what we have now:fingers-crossed:
EdgaBimbam said:
And snapdragon doesnt eats your battery? Lol......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No generally snapdragon is quite good for battery life management.
What is your 3D Mark result?
You can download it here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application
I'm a little surprised I get only 2727 while Tegra3 devices get almost 4400 and even one Tegra2 device was higher (overclocked maybe? or mistake... Galaxy Tab 10.1).
Ice Storm Extreme: 2060 (here only new generation devices are higher, so it's quite a good result)
Ice Storm normal: 2727
AW: 3D Mark result
ICE STORM : 2794
ICE STORM EXTREME : 2092
Gesendet von meinem GT-N8000 mit Tapatalk 2
jillmec said:
ICE STORM : 2794
ICE STORM EXTREME : 2092
Gesendet von meinem GT-N8000 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much the same here
Sent from my GT-N8010 using xda app-developers app
Thanks. So it looks like the Tegra3 has quite a powerful GPU.
Or 3DMark Mobile is more optimized for Tegra and Qualcomm. You don't know.
animelover said:
Or 3DMark Mobile is more optimized for Tegra and Qualcomm. You don't know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to reviews........ The app seems to not be working correctly or causing overheating for many users.
I'm a little leary to install the app because of overheating claims.
Has anyone experienced overheating?
Thanks
.
No overheating but same s****y scores....but its just a score. Will try to force gpu rendering and retry.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
kkretch said:
I'm a little leery to install the app because of overheating claims. Has anyone experienced overheating?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry about overheating- the kernel has some excellent thermal-management code in it that first downclocks you to 800MHz (which will kill your benchmark result ), then if that doesn't cool you down, shuts down the Note.
Galaxy Note 10.1 3G 4.2.2 Baked ROM (1.6 GHz)
Ice Storm: 3342
Graphic: 2791
Physics: 10835
Something is off about the app, my HTC Evo3D with a dual core Qualcomm S3 processor and adreno 220 gets 3500 in the non extreme test and around 2800 in the extreme version
sent from my "Ur IPhone will never do this" Phone
I got a score of 3383 OCd to 1.7ghz
Ice Storm Extreme: 2069
Ice Storm normal: 2751
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2
Wow these scores are horrible, my s3 hit 6046 on ice storm. I'm gonna have to throw this on ye old note 10.1 and see what happens.
Does your s3 run a exynos cpu ? Heard that at-t ones come with snapdragon. ...
Basically mali vs adreno
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
2739 Regular
2054 Extreme
Stock, no root or OC
Sent from my GT-N8013 using XDA Premium HD app
---------- Post added at 10:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 AM ----------
DeBoX said:
Does your s3 run a exynos cpu ? Heard that at-t ones come with snapdragon. ...
Basically mali vs adreno
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AT&T US are Snapdragon with 2Gb of RAM. International are Exynos with 1GB.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using XDA Premium HD app
---------- Post added at 10:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 AM ----------
Even if the scores are low, I don't really care. I know I own a great tablet and it serves all my needs effectively. Top of the line is top of the line, benchmark results notwithstanding.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using XDA Premium HD app
HTML:
DeBoX said:
Does your s3 run a exynos cpu ? Heard that at-t ones come with snapdragon. ...
Basically mali vs adreno
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OIC. I have a vzw s3, so adreno ftw.
Same low score here. Can't be right
lol, my HTC One S (snapdragon S4 dual, 1 gig ram) gets scores which are more than double what my Note 10.1 gets. WTF?
Erm, unless y'all are running phones with 1280x800 resolution, there's no point in comparing the scores of those with that of the Note.
I'm really disapointing about the results with that benchmark are. It's maybe because Exynos 4412 is not as powerfull as we thought