Related
Switched to CM9 last night and I want to Undervolt it to get the max out of the battery.
Plz share your Undervolting experience, which rom, kernel, settings, ect'...
I imagine it will help more people and not just me
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
For now UV is only possible with GB kernels, the ones built from Sammy's source code, and I don't think there's anyone left with gb so this question is pointless for now until we'll get the ICS source code from Sammy
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
moshikko said:
For now UV is only possible with GB kernels, the ones built from Sammy's source code, and I don't think there's anyone left with gb so this question is pointless for now until we'll get the ICS source code from Sammy
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It works on Stunner and CM9 for me.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Screw that last guy who thinks he knows jacks ass, use your favourite app to change cpu settings or terminal console to change both cpu gpu, assuming ur using the cm9 experimental builds with the kernel included.
And my shared settings to u are:
CPU
1400 - 1175
1200 - 1125
1000 - 1075
800 - 1025
500 - 950
200 - 925
GPU
400 - 1050000
267 - 875000
200 - 825000
And if u know under and overvolting, its pain in the ass to find the right settings which works for u, overheating issues for me are greatly reduced by undervolting.
beckend said:
Screw that last guy who thinks he knows jacks ass, use your favourite app to change cpu settings or terminal console to change both cpu gpu, assuming ur using the cm9 experimental builds with the kernel included.
And my shared settings to u are:
CPU
1400 - 1175
1200 - 1125
1000 - 1075
800 - 1025
500 - 950
200 - 925
GPU
400 - 1050000
267 - 875000
200 - 825000
And if u know under and overvolting, its pain in the ass to find the right settings which works for u, overheating issues for me are greatly reduced by undervolting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Watch you language little a*hole
Cm9 and stunner with all respect have some bugs to use as daily rom ( speaker, otg, ums) and a proper kernel can't be delivered yet until source code is out from Sammy, I bought my note for a reason and it is certainly not to have an oversized GNexus!
Next time think a bit before you comment,
I just gave my opinion for UV with experimental kernel since many hardbricks due to playing with kernels is going on right now, and I know that UV can't cause a brick but the kernel might!
So I prefer a GNote kernel, made from a gnote source code even if it means waiting for it a bit longer, than a kernel made from sgs2 source code .
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Giving people false information based on what u think without proof or facts, whatever man send me pms if u rly need to bring up nonsense, spare the thread your whine.
moshikko said:
Watch you language little a*hole
Cm9 and stunner with all respect have some bugs to use as daily rom ( speaker, otg, ums) and a proper kernel can't be delivered yet until source code is out from Sammy, I bought my note for a reason and it is certainly not to have an oversized GNexus!
Next time think a bit before you comment,
I just gave my opinion for UV with experimental kernel since many hardbricks due to playing with kernels is going on right now, and I know that UV can't cause a brick but the kernel might!
So I prefer a GNote kernel, made from a gnote source code even if it means waiting for it a bit longer, than a kernel made from sgs2 source code .
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said:
moshikko said:
For now UV is only possible with GB kernels, the ones built from Sammy's source code, and I don't think there's anyone left with gb so this question is pointless for now until we'll get the ICS source code from Sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not true.
Also, be careful with the official ICS ROM. It has the eMMC bug which can "superbrick" your Note, which requires a motherboard swap to fix. I'll be using CM9, which is safe.
searched and found this thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1433952&highlight=undervolt
How do you Undervolt gpu?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
pboesboes said:
Also, be careful with the official ICS ROM. It has the eMMC bug which can "superbrick" your Note, which requires a motherboard swap to fix. I'll be using CM9, which is safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything on earth contains the "superbrick" bug... that is, if you were previously on CM9....
NOTE, USE UR OWN VALUES. Applies to cm9 experimental builds with supplied kernel.
If u know how to use terminal console or adb, u can do:
For voltage:
echo "825000 875000 1050000" > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/gpu_voltage_control/gpu_control
For frequencies:
echo "200 266 400" > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/gpu_clock_control/gpu_control
pboesboes said:
You said:
This is not true.
Also, be careful with the official ICS ROM. It has the eMMC bug which can "superbrick" your Note, which requires a motherboard swap to fix. I'll be using CM9, which is safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess I didn't explain myself the way I wanted, no harm done
Most of the time I use speaker when driving which is missing in CM9
So I'm forced to use official rom
That's why I said UV is not possible yet
My bad for including cm9 in my first post
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda pre mium
clandestino123 said:
Everything on earth contains the "superbrick" bug... that is, if you were previously on CM9....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't heard of anyone bricking because of xplodwild's CM9. If you mean chasmodo, that was most likely because he wiped on the LPY kernel.
moshikko said:
Guess I didn't explain myself the way I wanted, no harm done
Most of the time I use speaker when driving which is missing in CM9
So I'm forced to use official rom
That's why I said UV is not possible yet
My bad for including cm9 in my first post
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda pre mium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the custom ROMs out there are still a little buggy and probably not the best for daily driving!
pboesboes said:
I haven't heard of anyone bricking because of xplodwild's CM9. If you mean chasmodo, that was most likely because he wiped on the LPY kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
show me one person who has bricked their phone, who has not first used CM9 or some derivative... I believe that all of these hard bricks are being triggered by CM9 in some way.
clandestino123 said:
show me one person who has bricked their phone, who has not first used CM9 or some derivative... I believe that all of these hard bricks are being triggered by CM9 in some way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're the one making the claim here, why don't you get some evidence to back it up?
It's quite an extraordinary claim, and I'd be more inclined to believe Entropy512's take on the matter (eMMC bug in leaked kernels) because he's a kernel dev.
Just to be clear, you're talking about this CM9: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1627855?
I am currently on ReVolt JB v3.1
Kernel : CM10.1 kernel
I also want to UV my phone for a better battery life.
Can someone help?!
rohhanpandya said:
I am currently on ReVolt JB v3.1
Kernel : CM10.1 kernel
I also want to UV my phone for a better battery life.
Can someone help?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on [TEST FIRMWARE][ODIN REPACK] JB 4.1.2 GT-N7000XXLSC clear stock rooted with Philz kernel, and have UV my phone using Tegrak Overclock Ultimate from Google Play (paid app).
My battery life has been greatly improved with UV.
You can find more information on UV in this thread: Undervolting the GT-N7000 for better Battery life http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2091056
So I've got some time at the moment to work on the vibrant again, so I figured I'd ask you guys a question.
What are you guys wanting out of the vibrant?
I'm not really one to go for the latest and greatest buzz word feature like "Linaro build" or "optimized build prop," etc.
lengthy posts are encouraged, tell me what you still want out of this device. What do you use it for? What do you want to use it for? Etc.
Like I said, not looking for "gimme 500MB ram" or " an updated 2.3 kernel", I wanna know what user experience your looking for.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
No takers?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Now we have almost faultless ROMs and kernels, the only issue is GPS.
+1 on GPS
lorendroll said:
Now we have almost faultless ROMs and kernels, the only issue is GPS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point if the question was missed, it's not about faults. Also there are very talented individuals working on the GPS issues. I cannot test GPS as mine no longer works. I want to know not just for me but also the talented Devs working on the vibrant, what ideas do you guys have for improving the Android experience, just in this case I happen to be gearing it toward the vibrant as I won't be working in anything else myself. That doesn't mean it's faulty, there is always room for improvement.
Anyway...not monitoring this thread anymore....Idgaf anymore and people not gonna answer :3
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
ECOTOX,
Just in case you do monitor this thread Ill give you a request. Ive built a couple of Froyo ROMs now, and plan to stick with Froyo for some time (at least until the EU error fixed)
That said I usually package the Bali 18.8.UV kernel with them. My favorite Froyo kernel is the DMZ kernel.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/633-kernel2213ghzdragonmodz-nightly3smartassscary8262011140pm/
What set your work apart is the fact it could stepclimp in 100mhz increments. My phone pukes at anything over 1100mhz. Its has the smartass governor (the one I want) that works perfectly. It is smooth, quick, and almost perfect for my needs. Ive only packaged it with one of my ROMs due to the lack to stepclimbing. Here is a request:
Ive tried up to 3 different overclock / volting programs. Tried to set it manually via init script, but the kernel has 2 stock settings: 500mhz / 1000mhz. If I I overclock to 1100mhz I only get three settings: 500/1000/1100. Is there any way you could get a 200mhz in there?
That said your git is available. I don't know how but I guess I could try and build my own based off your source / patches. You kinda sounded like you wanted to help/work some on the T959. With the EU error we have more folks coming back to Froyo every day. Froyo is not dead if I have anything to say about it -
Thanks for your time (I if read this)
+1 on GPS
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
GPS is primarily due to inadequate or faulty hardware design. We have pushed the limits of trying to fix it with software guys.
I personally would love more battery life. I truly cannot get more than 45 minutes of screen time in ICS.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA
How about intergrating more RAM?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Moped_Ryder said:
ECOTOX,
Just in case you do monitor this thread Ill give you a request. Ive built a couple of Froyo ROMs now, and plan to stick with Froyo for some time (at least until the EU error fixed)
That said I usually package the Bali 18.8.UV kernel with them. My favorite Froyo kernel is the DMZ kernel.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/633-kernel2213ghzdragonmodz-nightly3smartassscary8262011140pm/
What set your work apart is the fact it could stepclimp in 100mhz increments. My phone pukes at anything over 1100mhz. Its has the smartass governor (the one I want) that works perfectly. It is smooth, quick, and almost perfect for my needs. Ive only packaged it with one of my ROMs due to the lack to stepclimbing. Here is a request:
Ive tried up to 3 different overclock / volting programs. Tried to set it manually via init script, but the kernel has 2 stock settings: 500mhz / 1000mhz. If I I overclock to 1100mhz I only get three settings: 500/1000/1100. Is there any way you could get a 200mhz in there?
That said your git is available. I don't know how but I guess I could try and build my own based off your source / patches. You kinda sounded like you wanted to help/work some on the T959. With the EU error we have more folks coming back to Froyo every day. Froyo is not dead if I have anything to say about it -
Thanks for your time (I if read this)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol happened to be browsing the forum for info and saw you posted here.
I'll make you a kernel, but I'm not 100%sure I'm sticking with the 100mhz steps for my own release but I'll make you one specifically. I might, but I want to get voltage control working with 100mhz steps, I also gotta work on keeping the gpu clocks more stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I would be in your debt sir. Thanks for your time.
I just wanted to say thanks for the great work on DMZ, ECOTOX. It has surpassed Overstock as my kernel of choice, but I had one quick question/request. Is it an issue with the kernel or with a particular ROM for some functions to get a little quirky when you start to overclock into the 1.2Ghz range? Whenever I set the CPU ceiling to 1.2Ghz the long press functions on the haptic buttons of the Vibrant would become flakey. I read that's fairly common with overclocking, but was curious who the culprit might be.
Not knowing anything about how scalers/governers can be implemented, what would the chances be to get something like Smartass v2 or a few more options on a new Froyo kernel? I liked messing around with them when I was running Sub-Zero on ICZen to find that happy medium of battery life vs performance.
I say a Galaxy S III themed gingerbread ROM. Anyone?
Hey guys,
I wanted to get everyone's feedback and experiences between the 3 kernels. I realize that every device behaves differently, but was curious about which ones people have tried, if they found any cool things about specific ones they really liked Or if you wanted to share your experience about the latest build.
Thanks!
Trinity and franco are about the same, but trinity>franco.
KTmanta is in a totally different league, it offers total customization and imo is the best kernel just because of that.
Franco and Trinity are all about performance where ktmanta is about battery optimizations and customizations.
I haven't used Franco or trinity in a while, I know they score higher in benchmarks if that means anything at all.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
I think everyone knows my preference, but they are all good kernels. Unfortunately this tablet is not on Franco's priority list and does not see much development. I dont believe it has a 4.3 compatible version yet and the last release has a serious bug that causes SoD for most people.
I like Trinity and KManta for different reasons (those stated above). If I need to squeeze out battery life, I go with KManta and tweak the settings accordingly. But for my day-to-day use, I like Trinity for its smoothness. Just my two cents
Awesome input guys! Real useful information.
How would you guys describe KTManta when just using the stock values? When you guys say "customization", do you guys mean the voltage settings and stuff like that? I've been flashing for years, but have never really understood how that worked. Which is funny, because I am an experienced PC overclocker. People say the concept is very similar. If KTManta's customization options were removed, would it be then comparable to Trinity? Or would it still be better without all the options?
Would you guys say Trinity still has decent battery life? Compared to KTManta at stock values?
Which one does Chrome work the best with?
Thanks!
Stock for stock Trinity is better because Morfic hardcodes overclock and undervolt values into the kernel and sets up all that stuff as his stock settings for the kernel. KTManta allows you to do those things and WAY more, but does not set them up as stock values because Ktoonsez prefers to keep the default settings for his kernel closer to the default settings of the stock AOSP kernel. So while Trinity may have -50mv undervolt to everything and a GPU overclock of 620MHz (I think that is the speed?), KTManta allows you to go +/- 200 mv to any frequency step for CPU or GPU that you feel like and also allows OC to 2.1GHz on CPU and 720MHz on the GPU if you want to, as well as RAM OC if you want to, and control of the scaling of every part of the chipset, again if you *want* to. But it doesnt set any custom stuff as default since everyone's device is unique and people want to do different things with it. That is why we have pre-made settings available from various users so that you can load custom values to try out without having to go through a bunch of experimentation yourself.
Are there currently any kernels that would work nicely with 5.0? I want to overclock a bit but don't think theres any kernels yet, just asking here as assurance I'm right or to be proved wrong.
S1L3nTShaDoWz said:
Are there currently any kernels that would work nicely with 5.0? I want to overclock a bit but don't think theres any kernels yet, just asking here as assurance I'm right or to be proved wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Youre able to use any kernels such as funky, faux, etc. Basically any that dont come with their own ramdisk. Personally i use snuzzos funky kernel that if you care about benchmarks puts the grouper right on top with this years' flagship devices on antutu without any overclocking. Though if thats a need faux is stable enough with lolipop to overclock nicely
Edit: if you were to go with funky you should try out the CPU governor 'lulzactive' as that's by far better than any other I've tried, on my hardware at least.
abrahammmmmmm_ said:
Youre able to use any kernels such as funky, faux, etc. Basically any that dont come with their own ramdisk. Personally i use snuzzos funky kernel that if you care about benchmarks puts the grouper right on top with this years' flagship devices on antutu without any overclocking. Though if thats a need faux is stable enough with lolipop to overclock nicely
Edit: if you were to go with funky you should try out the CPU governor 'lulzactive' as that's by far better than any other I've tried, on my hardware at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do, I'm looking for something to make my N7 go from a car engine to a hyperdrive! & yes I love getting high benchmarks, sorta tricks me into believing my device is faster than it is lol. Might make me be totally oblivious to any lag haha xD. Anyways I'll give funky a shot with the lulzactive gov as I've already tried Faux before.
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Dn_nS said:
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the snapdrag version can be underclocked but there is no OC as the kernel is not modifiable Due to locked BootLoader
TheMadScientist said:
Well the snapdrag version can be underclocked but there is no OC as the kernel is not modifiable Due to locked BootLoader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I didn't specify things. I do mean the exynos version. There are some kernels that lift the 2,3 max freq to 2,65 GHz, but know that some S7 kernels climb to 2,9 GHz. So (in my book) that means the S8 should be able to overclock to 3 GHz (cause of the base A73 base of the 2nd gen mongoose cores and 10nm footprint).
So I'm just curious if it's not possible or there is some other reason why none are doing this.
And with underclocking I meant adding freqs that are below the standard lowest freq, my bad. (Don't how to call it otherwise)
Battery life.....
Battery life mainly.
Through overclocking, sure you can make s8 run as fast as oneplus considering s8's heavy skin, but most of us would rather see 6-8 hours of SOT with 24 hours of usage than our app opening 1-2 seconds faster.
Saying that, there are plenty of debloated roms for s8 that can run faster/smoother than the stock without sacrificing the battery life.
So, as for your question, maybe the devs don't want to put too much effort on overclocking an already pretty fast processor or underclocking an already pretty efficient processor. I am not a dev so can't really talk about complicated codings and stuff.
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This! Says it all.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
The S8 is fast enough on its own. I never even OC'd my S6. I find Exynos processors to be really fast as-is.
It's true, I dont't see any practical use for overclocking, yet. It would be purely for the fun of it. I'm sure we will see it more in the future, when some more hardware-heavy Games will be released.
Undervolting on the other surprises me aswell, to not see it frequently. Because, although it's totally fine right now, batterylife and efficiency can always be better.
I'm curious if we will see more Devs include this in their ROMs and Kernels
I agree with all the above. I called either due to snapdragon but I wouldn't even i if I could. I actually limit the clock speed on my big CPUs because the higher clock rates eat more power.
Also, why? Just why? Looking at cpu usage on my s8, the only time I've seen it actually pegged was running benchmarks. Overclocking is absolutely useless if the variable cpu clock never goes to 100% for more than milliseconds. Why do something so potentially dangerous for nothing?
:good::good::good:Well put guys:good::good::good:
I cant overclock but i still have set cpu and use it to underclock (when the screen is off) but most kf the time it is underclocked if it is not playing a game or ram extensive app
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you overclock GTX 2080? Why you overclock i9 or amd threadripper 2950x cpu? Why you overclock DDR4 3000MHZ Ram? Why you use 3DMark? Or cinebench or, or or........
Thats all the same.
To everyone asking "Why??", I find it rather odd that you don't know already...
The reason why some of us like (want) to overclock, or undervolt, is the exact same reason we're all on this site: We like to TWEAK STUFF!
Doesn't matter if it's rooting, flashing a custom ROM, creating a unique theme, coding a new app. All of those boil down to the same human instinct to explore, to make things better, or make new things. Whether or not it's needed is completely irrelevant
Using your logic, there's no reason to have a custom kernel in the first place, nevermind rooting your phone, or having custom ROM. The phone worked fine the way it was, after all, right?
In closing, the motto "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" is what the lay people adhere to. We who are more inclined in certain aspects of life (such as the XDA community) live by another: "If it ain't broke, tweak it!", or if you rather "If it ain't broke, tweak it till it does, then fix it!"
Please add over/underclocking and over/under volting for CPU and GPU cores to every kernel, for every device that allows it! We already except blame if anything bad should come to our device the moment we decide to root and/or flash something, so why not give us every single capability available for the devices and leave it up to us to do what we so choose? :good:
[Naturally, this is based on the assumption that a device lacks a bootloader, and the kernel maker possesses the knowledge; thus, this is referring to those situations where both apply.]
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be faster than other team who is performance tuning as well. You don't have to do it because not everyone is doing. It should be geared towards to people who really care. Like others in this thread mention battery life but people like me wants it faster.
Also I game with the phone connected to charger all the time. I don't really game on the go though if I did I would bring portable battery if someone driving me. That just me.
People like me use phones for emulation. GameCube games are almost at the right speed but do run just a bit to slow in some location rendering them unpleasant to play. A bit more of cpu power would certainly make " Wind waker " run at constant 30 FPS. I hope this topic to be revived
Well just a quick answer , it's because of how samsung's voltage table is set , the voltage table is locked and to be modifed it needs to be hacked in some sort , that's why you cant oc that much since you need to change the voltage table and increase it so you can have stable oc
Addition:
There is alot of kernels that has oc already gpu and cpu wise , they add like 200mhz oc or something for cpu and 100 for the gpu yeah that would give you that little bit of extra juice but it aint stable in some sort you can have kernel crashes or system hogging that's due to the voltage table , i can make you a kernel that has 600mhz oc but ass soon as you select it , the phone would crash since it doesnt have enough power going to it
As Xperia modder said, darn LOCKED voltage table. If only it was unlocked....
---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:28 PM ----------
xperia modder said:
Well just a quick answer , it's because of how samsung's voltage table is set , the voltage table is locked and to be modifed it needs to be hacked in some sort , that's why you cant oc that much since you need to change the voltage table and increase it so you can have stable oc
Addition:
There is alot of kernels that has oc already gpu and cpu wise , they add like 200mhz oc or something for cpu and 100 for the gpu yeah that would give you that little bit of extra juice but it aint stable in some sort you can have kernel crashes or system hogging that's due to the voltage table , i can make you a kernel that has 600mhz oc but ass soon as you select it , the phone would crash since it doesnt have enough power going to it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I ask you a question? Just to have a doubt removed from my head. Do you know if Exynos 8890 devices have locked voltage table as well?
TechNoobForSale said:
As Xperia modder said, darn LOCKED voltage table. If only it was unlocked....
---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:28 PM ----------
Can I ask you a question? Just to have a doubt removed from my head. Do you know if Exynos 8890 devices have locked voltage table as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well tbh i dont know but this has always been. A thing with exynos chips , yeah some developers go out of their way and write some stuff from scratch to make it work you know
Dn_nS said:
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah has been realesed a2n kernel oc up to 2,8 ghz and oc up to 839mhz all of them is all core