Mozilla have launched Firefox OS based on Linux kernel ... Its open source ... I would like any of our good developers to look forward towards developing this OS for our phones
More detail here: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/b2g/
would be hard if there's no propietary driver kernel source..
It's possible.
Here's manifest: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
I'm too busy to port it for now. Maybe someone else can do that.
i will give it a try to port it
This isn't android based... it's not a ROM it's an other OS... i think if it's possible it will be very hard
i have knowledge of unbranded os types
It's not android. But it is linux and android is also linux, so I think drivers can be ported from android to this, no (though no api stuff and such will be the same)?
I assume it'll be hard, much harder than ics and jelly bean, but still possible.
But I also think that it won't run as good/smooth as ics and in the future jb will run.
So it might run, but if it's useful is another question...
Nevertheless it would be awesome to see it running on the gio.
Also does it need to run on it's own or is it possible to run it on top of the android kernel? If this is the case then it becomes rather easy as we have enough stable android kernels for the gio.
Marcin, is that the purpose of the link you posted?
marcin1147 said:
It's possible.
Here's manifest: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
I'm too busy to port it for now. Maybe someone else can do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's Android based, it uses AOSP repo besided Linaro repo and Mozzila repo!
Code:
<remote name="aosp"
fetch="https://android.googlesource.com/" />
bgm92 said:
I think it's Android based, it uses AOSP repo besided Linaro repo and Mozzila repo!
Code:
<remote name="aosp"
fetch="https://android.googlesource.com/" />
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but i see no apps in the manifest
tioammar said:
but i see no apps in the manifest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course not. It's based on android, so the core shares a lot with the core of android. This doesn't make it android.
The whole os is (except for the core stuff) web based, which probably means all apps need to be written in html 5 or maybe other web standards.
So android apk apps don't work, and so it makes no sence including them.
Stannieman said:
Of course not. It's based on android, so the core shares a lot with the core of android. This doesn't make it android.
The whole os is (except for the core stuff) web based, which probably means all apps need to be written in html 5 or maybe other web standards.
So android apk apps don't work, and so it makes no sence including them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simple and great explanation.. thanks
currently trying to port give me some days
warface123 said:
currently trying to port give me some days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/MaclawStudios
Here are sources for android ICS on GIO. Since the manifest uses android 4.0.4 I think you may need to use some things from this (don't forget to mention Maclaw and Marcin if you do).
Soon this will be updated to JB I think, I don't know if FFOS works with JB as well or it specifically needs ICS though.
About firefox OS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_OS
So it's not entirely android based. It only uses some parts for some of the hardware.
thanks for the sourches
It's based android. Because s2 users can install it.
its dam hard but i am making progress what do you want guys odin or cwm just wanna now
warface123 said:
its dam hard but i am making progress what do you want guys odin or cwm just wanna now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
odin
alright it will be odin then now i gonna sleep but will continu tommorow
How much android is really in it? Mozilla made it so that it can run on devices that run android. So they probably just mean ARM with a certain ammount of ram etc...
Wikipedia says it's a linux kernel, some components of android for hardware communication, mozilla's own api's for app -> hardware communication such as phone, cam, speakers etc, and last but not least the gecko engine.
So if the kernel used is the same as the one used for android then you could use maclaw (and team)'s ICS kernel + the android stuff needed, merged with the b2g sources.
I'm not really a dev so it's probably a lot harder then what I'm saying here. But I think it's easier then a fully fledged android...
Were you able to boot something already?
Related
I find that many developers are working on porting android 2.1 or 1.6 vanila and it result in much duplicated work.
I was thinking of maybe setting up 2 git repositories one for 1.6 AOSP and 2.1 AOSP on which everyone can work on, improve and fix bugs.
lgstoian said:
I find that many developers are working on porting android 2.1 or 1.6 vanila and it result in much duplicated work.
I was thinking of maybe setting up 2 git repositories one for 1.6 AOSP and 2.1 AOSP on which everyone can work on, improve and fix bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a nice idea, im begging to look after a site to host the repositories...
We can use github for hosting or any other site. I'm interested in looking after the repositories too.
A centralized effort will always be better then a fragmented one.
lgstoian said:
We can use github for hosting or any other site. I'm interested in looking after the repositories too.
A centralized effort will always be better then a fragmented one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have alot of money, then Github would be ok... But it costs $50/month for the package that is minimum for two sets of android source code...
Know any places where we can host the code?
Mod. edit: not dev related, moved to general
Gitorious and Github are both free and unlimited for open source projects.
We can use sourcefordge too. The offer svn and git repositories. So what about it folks, who would be interested?
I would be interested in this...
I think we should open a project on sourcefordge for android 2.2 with the first task being to get the new kernel (2.6.32) working on the tattoo.
It could host the long awaited universal froyo upgrade
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
lgstoian said:
I think we should open a project on sourcefordge for android 2.2 with the first task being to get the new kernel (2.6.32) working on the tattoo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be hard becuase the new kernel (2.6.32) is very big so we would need something like GRUB to boot it, from another partition than the boot partition...
If we disable enough modules the size should go down but that would mean it won't be universal any more.
There could be a regular version and a 'lite' version for Tattoo and older phones.
Wait wait wait.
I can play full divx movies smoothly so some seldom used modules could be stored on sd with no prob.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
http://releases.linaro.org/11.11/android/images-ics-preview/mainline-panda/
http://www.linaro.org/downloads/
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb
panda is also omap4
riverzhou said:
http://releases.linaro.org/11.11/android/images-ics-preview/mainline-panda/
http://www.linaro.org/downloads/
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb
panda is also omap4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slight bit of English might not hurt?
What is this?
What's there not to understand? Pandaboard is one of the most popular OMAP4 targets.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
pyrostic said:
Slight bit of English might not hurt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b12/tehglow/manytank.jpg
that is many tank?
yes?
Linaro is an Alliance of ARM TI IBM Samsung Freescale ST-Ericsson . It's working for Open source Software for Linux on the ARM Cortex-A family of processors , Android on ARM, Unbuntu on ARM , linux/anrdoid toolchains and some libs .
They release their own source distribution Optimizated for Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 , and image distribution for PandaBoard(TI OMAP4430) , Origen(Samsung Exynos4210) , Snowball(ST-Ericsson's Nova A9500) , QuickStart(Freescale i.MX53) .
In one word , linaro android distribution will be better for A8 and A9 processors , much more Optimization .
This looks interesting, how do I test it out?
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
XperiaPlayer said:
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have a git repo to pull the sources from, so devs could base roms off of this instead of AOSP. I don't see the advantage, but it's another option I guess~
XperiaPlayer said:
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get source as same as CM or AOSP.
repo init -u git://android.git.linaro.org/platform/manifest.git -b linaro-android-11.12-release
repo sync
Linaro Android distribution will be better for A8 and A9 processors , much more Optimization .
And , you can use gcc4.5.4(linaro version) or gcc4.6.3(linaro version) to compile this Andoid distribution but CM or AOSP only for gcc4.4.3 from google.
shobon said:
They have a git repo to pull the sources from, so devs could base roms off of this instead of AOSP. I don't see the advantage, but it's another option I guess~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a full optimization version for A8/A9 platform. It's all.
Anyway, linaro gcc is the best compiler for arm.
It can be use to compile android kernel , ever for CM or AOSP .
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, Sailfish is not yet released to public, and most propably wont be before Jolla phone hits markets. So you can't get it before
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody knows yet, because nobody hasn't been able to have a look at it, since it hasn't been released. But I doubt that the kernel would match, since it doesn't even match on different Android phones. There are always some minor changes.
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i think it will be possible run Sailfish on non-Jolla phone, anyway you should wait because there is no image for arm cpu in public.
tabstop said:
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in android devices in /dev very often is used from binary blobs.
and this blob compiled againts another libc called bionic and it is not compatible with glibc, but Jolla phone will use android drivers via special library.
Sailfish OS for Motorola XT910 ( Droid RAZR )
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the Sailfish OS runs on linux kernel thats for sure and soon it will have the capability to run almost all of the android apks, which means it can not be totally different form android form 'under-the-hood' so there is always some room to try it on your android devices.
I haven't really tried to explore Sailfish OS much, but if u do, plz tell me and I would like to do it on my phone (Moto xt910).
If you come across any guide for installing Sailfish OS on non-jolla phones, plz post the links here.
sidbhatt11 said:
Well, the Sailfish OS runs on linux kernel thats for sure and soon it will have the capability to run almost all of the android apks, which means it can not be totally different form android form 'under-the-hood' so there is always some room to try it on your android devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
running apk doesn`t mean anything, i can run apk on my windows 7.
internaly it is GNU Linux, not android.
sidbhatt11 said:
I haven't really tried to explore Sailfish OS much, but if u do, plz tell me and I would like to do it on my phone (Moto xt910).
If you come across any guide for installing Sailfish OS on non-jolla phones, plz post the links here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should understand that nobody care about your motorola or what ever device you own. 3.5 developers that can build nemo mobile image will not do it just because of your request.
If I remember right the first demo shown of it was on a nexus phone. so of course it will run on android phone.
tsaxda said:
If I remember right the first demo shown of it was on a nexus phone. so of course it will run on android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you give URL?
EnErGy[CSDX] said:
can you give URL?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just remember seeing a video demo of it on youtube and the guy giving the demo said it was running on a galaxy nexus. I don't have the link but you could find it easily on youtube.
It's an open source,isn't it?
c786764052 said:
It's an open source,isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Silica components and that fancy home screen are not open source
I must admit I really like this OS.. even if it is similar to blackberry 10 for some aspects.. if this os will be avaiable for rooted android phones, i will certainly install it on mine!
I'd install it fast if my phone could get this (LG L5), but I think it's too weak on it. Maybe Sony Ericsson xperia neo would take this.
Sent from my LG-E610 using xda app-developers app
N9 arm port is here who starts porting?
EnErGy[CSDX] said:
Yes i think it will be possible run Sailfish on non-Jolla phone, anyway you should wait because there is no image for arm cpu in public.
in android devices in /dev very often is used from binary blobs.
and this blob compiled againts another libc called bionic and it is not compatible with glibc, but Jolla phone will use android drivers via special library.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
since the N9 port of Sailfish OS is now available:
h**p://jollausers.com/2013/12/the-comprehensive-guide-to-port-sailfish-to-n9/
and the arm chipset in the N9 (OMAP3630) is equal to many Android devices like the Defy+ h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OMAP it would be nice to hear that someone begins with the porting to other Android devices. Hopefully also for my Droid 4 (OMAP4430).
https://github.com/KonstaT/sailfishos_kernel_jolla_msm8930
thx to Konsta @ talk.maemo.org
cvp said:
https://github.com/KonstaT/sailfishos_kernel_jolla_msm8930
thx to Konsta @ talk.maemo.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be great if it could run on Galaxy note 2 or 3.
Hello OPX community,
I started to work on the port and its progressing nicely, UI is up also Wifi works now, but many things still don't work, so help is defintly appreciated.
Current status: wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Adaptations/libhybris
OLD:
I don't know if some of you know Sailfish OS, but its an OS that is not based on Android with an outstanding UI and UX.
And developers can port it to Android based devices like ours \o/
So I took the hand and compiled Sailfish OS and Android, but unfortunaly I don't really have the time to test since this is my only phone.
So I need someone to either test and report to me or what would be better someone that can develope further on its own after I shared my knowledge with him.
This thread is for talking about everything related to Sailfish OS.
Here are some useful links:
Jolla.com
Sailfish Porting
HADK
+1
This would be my dream coming true...
I might be able to test it, if You can make a flashable zip. Is this build supposed to support android runtime? If I flash it, my recovery and internal SD remains untouched?
osvatha said:
+1
This would be my dream coming true...
I might be able to test it, if You can make a flashable zip. Is this build supposed to support android runtime? If I flash it, my recovery and internal SD remains untouched?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android Support is currently not available for ported devices but there are some devs working on an open source solution.
Your recovery will stay the same.
Internal SD should stay untouched of you don't wipe it but it will probably not visible from sailfish but there was a fix for that, dunno if that is already upstream.
https://twitter.com/taaeem_/status/690475762609168384
UI is booting up on the OnePlus X!!
Still having Jolla with me and running Sailfish OS on OpX hw would make it sweet.
prarun2030 said:
Still having Jolla with me and running Sailfish OS on OpX hw would make it sweet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can say it's really really smooth :victory:
I haven't heard about this OS, is this some custom ROM, CM based? or what? :silly:
FcoEnrique said:
I haven't heard about this OS, is this some custom ROM, CM based? or what? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a completely different OS, it's based off Mer which is kind of a Linux distribution and on top of that sits sailfish OS. CM is only used on Android via libhybris to get the hardware working. In fact it's completely different from Android and NOT based on it like CM. It's real Linux as a mobile OS.
Wifi up
Bluetooth up
All sensors up
Audio up
\o/
Nice progression, thanks for effort. Had a Jolla-device before and loved it. The HW build quality just wasnt there. Altough, I'd love to get the opensource dalvik-emu to work some day, since I have a bad feeling about future sw development on SailfishOS.
Awesome. Sorry I haven't been able to get back to you on the latest build. I haven't had time lately. Life kinda showed up abf took my time with it. I'll try to observe it later.
taaeem said:
I can say it's really really smooth :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
taaeem said:
It's a completely different OS, it's based off Mer which is kind of a Linux distribution and on top of that sits sailfish OS. CM is only used on Android via libhybris to get the hardware working. In fact it's completely different from Android and NOT based on it like CM. It's real Linux as a mobile OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds interesting, may have to look more about it.
Waiting for release to test!
Development would be much faster if we multirom for our device
taaeem said:
Development would be much faster if we multirom for our device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there multirom for oneplus X ? ?
sankarshan said:
Is there multirom for oneplus X ? ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sadly not
Sim is now detected and mobile data is working after adding your apn to settings \o/ video and music playback should also work now and RTC alarms are working so you never need to worry if your phone is off you won't miss that alarm
taaeem said:
Sim is now detected and mobile data is working after adding your apn to settings \o/ video and music playback should also work now and RTC alarms are working so you never need to worry if your phone is off you won't miss that alarm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol! And when we will be able to test it?
TheJedeX said:
Lol! And when we will be able to test it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could post it in a few hours, but than you don't have a camera, no LED and probably no calls (needs to be confirmed)
It would really be only a test build.
If I should do it, write it now
EDIT: Ah also Jolla Store is not working atm needs to be resolved server side. But there is still openrepos.