Related
http://m.techradar.com/news/phone-a...ones/samsung-galaxy-s3-specs-revealed-1066807
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hope they have LTE in my area (Miami) by then
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The "source" of these rumors none other than BGR...
Nothing but a low class gossip website that will say anything for page clicks.
ap3604 said:
The "source" of these rumors none other than BGR...
Nothing but a low class gossip website that will say anything for page clicks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AN Apple fansite nonetheless.
Hope this turns out to be true. Ceramic chassis sounds really really nice and very industrial. Maybe they're going for the iPhone 4 look?
I hope they aren't trying to make it look like an iAnything. You think they would stay away from that especially in light of all Apple suing them for everything. Plus I'd love a unique awesome look!
Alucardis666 said:
Hope this turns out to be true. Ceramic chassis sounds really really nice and very industrial. Maybe they're going for the iPhone 4 look?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if they were going for an iphone 4 look, they would make it look like broken glass.
looks nice...
Love exynos, but is this Samsung's first-generation of LTE?
I believe Samsung will be using a sister chip for the LTE, until they can perfect their own integrated solution.
They never did have their own solution - for radios they're using Infineon (now Intel) chips. The GS2 is XMM6260 or something like that, the next gen (not out yet, has LTE) is XMM7060.
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Last thing I need is for my phone to shatter first time I drop it..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cermamic is incredibly strong and rigid in certain applications. It's used in racing components, as heat shield coatings, reinforments. It's even popular with thw aerospace industry. Very durable...If the S3 goes with a ceramic chasis, I'm sold.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
--------------------------------
To make requests or suggestions, go here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22914429#post22914429
XDA rules can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
A great video explaining how XDA works, can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
mgd76 said:
Love exynos, but is this Samsung's first-generation of LTE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be first generation LTE with the Exynos CPU. Skyrocket is LTE with SnapDragon S3 CPU.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
--------------------------------
To make requests or suggestions, go here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22914429#post22914429
XDA rules can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
A great video explaining how XDA works, can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Coming from an iPhone 4 makes me appreciate the plastic backing of our phones. Won't chip from the slightest drop like my iPhone did.
Well, I'm leery of 1st-Gen LTE chips. I will not be an early adopter with the sgs3... Especially since Sammy will launch the sgs3+ two weeks later with the "super LTE" chips :-(
More rumors stating the GS3 will be the first phone to run a true 1080p screen beating out even Apple with their Retina screen. Not that you can really tell a difference on such a small device that at most would be used 3 feet away from your face.
http://pocketnow.com/android/galaxy-s-iii-to-feature-first-1080p-smartphone-display
NJGSII said:
This. Coming from an iPhone 4 makes me appreciate the plastic backing of our phones. Won't chip from the slightest drop like my iPhone did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 here my buddy's Iphone 4 fell off his lap and chipped his back glass.
sent from my CM9 powered cappy
As with others I would rather have plastic, Carbon Fiber would be neat though
Specs are not credible so no need to wish over them
First gen LTE on Exynos is what will make me pass... HSPA is more than fast enough for me and I see many bugs with it (LTE)
PeartFan40 said:
Cermamic is incredibly strong and rigid in certain applications. It's used in racing components, as heat shield coatings, reinforments. It's even popular with thw aerospace industry. Very durable...If the S3 goes with a ceramic chasis, I'm sold.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
[/url]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true but i don't think these things get dropped much . Which even if it could withstand it, I just don't like the fact that most likely with the type of enclosure, it won't have a removable battery cover. Furthermore with the design behaviors currently leaning towards as few buttons and ports as possible, for that clean look, there most likely won't be and external sd card.
Although I'm just griping, I love Samsung phones, and I will most likely still get it if the temptation somehow pries me from my wonderful sgs2
First of all I have to say, the Samsung Galaxy S3 looks veeeery good to me.
You want to know why?
1. Unique design, more curvy which definately will give you a better feeling when holding the phone in your hand. Just look at your palm, is it completely flat? I don't think so. Therefore it's easier to hold a curvy S3 in your hand compared to an angular shaped S2. I really think the S3 looks better and gives you more comfort just by seeing the way it's designed.
2. Plastic, it's very sturdy and therefore less damage can happen when it's dropped e.g. to the floor. Drop an iPhone/HTC and get ready to call the service line.
3. Weight, plastic is the way to go if you want a thin and light phone. Some people here sound as if they would like a flipping phone made out of solid osmium (heaviest of all metals)
4. Replaceable components, seriously guys, UNIBODY MY ASS, I want to be able to replace the battery without having to send it to Samsung and wait for the service to fix it. On top of that Unibody doesn't allow you to buy a bigger battery for your phone (though I think the stock 2100 mAh already is good!)
And no SD Card slot like the HTC One X? LOL.
5. Sorry for my english
Those being just some arguments which definately make reasonable why Sammy doesn't choose as same path as HTC/Apple.
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Master05 said:
1. Unique design, more curvy which definately will give you a better feeling when holding the phone in your hand. Just look at your palm, is it completely flat? I don't think so. Therefore it's easier to hold a curvy S3 in your hand compared to an angular shaped S2. I really think the S3 looks better and gives you more comfort just by seeing the way it's designed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
The back of the phone comes completely off. I'm sure there will be hundreds of back plates to choose from.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Bigmille said:
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talking about similarities, just a couple of days ago I found this article very amusing..
Plastic is a terrible conductor of heat.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Nice talk.you are a genius.like your points
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
edcoppen said:
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I personally like the back cover of the Galaxy Nexus. I'm not a fan of high gloss. Some kind of texture would would have been nice.
edcoppen said:
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's only a bit of plastic on the back that I'm sure you'll be able to buy third party ones.
ciscostud said:
The back of the phone comes completely off. I'm sure there will be hundreds of back plates to choose from.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can surely find lots of interesting faceplates and back covers for the SIII, even my Galaxy Ace has tons of awesome looking designs on a design store in an Indian Website(that's in english)
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too.
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same reason why people that own german cars think they have a better quality material eventhough it's the same plastic used in other brands just in different texture
i find it amusing that people think samsung doesnt use metal. the screen is bonded to a cast frame presumably aluminum but maybe magnesium on all the phones i have repaired. remove the battery and scrape the black area underneath with a sharp metal object if you dont believe me. the plastic they use is not only tough and fracture resistant but it's pretty much superficial.
now im sure htc has improved their designs but the evo was toy like in construction. thin cheap plastics and the pcb was a thin single layer design and the copper traces could easily seperate from the board. also the one i repaired had cold solder joints and the spring contacts they used in place or cables were falling off the board.
samsung does things that are frustrating from a development point of view but i never agreed with the quality argument.
well i'm looking forward to the s3 for the audio mostly. but i want to see what challenges the hardware offers aosp development. though i like touch wiz i dont expect samsung to support the device for more than 1 or 2 major updates. i have learned my lesson and will only buy the us version if it is the same hardware profile as the international version. and ill only buy an s3 if the bt and other hardware are aosp friendly.
Bigmille said:
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or this. Yours for only $89.
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you but HOX looks more sleek. Shiny plastics give the GS3 a feel of cheaper phone. Can't wait to hold it to see how it feels in real life.
ph00ny said:
It's the same reason why people that own german cars think they have a better quality material eventhough it's the same plastic used in other brands just in different texture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
German cars do have a better quality , I know from experience. But I get your point its how you use the material.
I think the plastic on the back of my galaxy nexus feels great .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Sim-1 said:
I agree with you but HOX looks more sleek. Shiny plastics give the GS3 a feel of cheaper phone. Can't wait to hold it to see how it feels in real life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure they will make a back that's matt just like the hox
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Yep replacement battery all the way!
Have to say that very impressed with some of the new features, Samsung have raised the bar yet again, and the super amoled screen at 441 DPI is as good as it gets, unfortunately it doesn't appear the build quality has changed, it might be slimmer but the same plastic build as I mentioned in another post I personally am sick of, if you are paying big money for a phone you really want it to be a premium build like the HTC One, of course I realise what is under the hood hood is more important but i personally am just tired of plasticky build and touchwiz forget about it,Nova Launcher is where it's at IMO., lost faith in Touchwiz a long time ago
To conclude, very impressed with many of the features but it just looks like a slightly larger version of our S3, when released will undoubtedly cost a fortune and no doubt will sell millions but i personally doubt I'll upgrade, I'll hang on another 2 months or so and see what is released , I'd buy the HTC One now if it had an SD slot.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Whats wrong with plastic build, its not like the back cover fall off as you touch it. Would you rather have metal case which will most likely cost more incase of replacement? and wouldnt you put protective case on anyway?
If there is something wrong with s3 or s4, it would be due to firmware/software, not hardware...
There has been SOME issues regarding quality finish on s3 back cover, but that doesnt mean platic build = bad. Also, out of all the s3 sold world wide, how many do you think actually have those defects....
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2173470
Samsung Galaxy SIII vs S4 (or any other phone) comparison
Really, Im not impressed... I would say that new SGS IV is SGS3 by small hardware and software liffting... Now i know that I don't want to buy it
Not impressed at all :/ Most of the features are software related, so we can expect that for our SGS3.
I'll go with HTC One...
mkim055 said:
Whats wrong with plastic build, its not like the back cover fall off as you touch it. Would you rather have metal case which will most likely cost more incase of replacement? and wouldnt you put protective case on anyway?
If there is something wrong with s3 or s4, it would be due to firmware/software, not hardware...
There has been SOME issues regarding quality finish on s3 back cover, but that doesnt mean platic build = bad. Also, out of all the s3 sold world wide, how many do you think actually have those defects....
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I mentioned this is just my own personal view, I just think it does not feel premium for the money you are paying, other manufacturers like HTC and Sony have released smartphones that are not only quality under the hood but also the build quality is premium, don't get me wrong I love my S3 but I feel the trend appears to be shifting towards premium build quality as well of course what's under the hood
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
jonny68 said:
As I mentioned this is just my own personal view, I just think it does not feel premium for the money you are paying, other manufacturers like HTC and Sony have released smartphones that are not only quality under the hood but also the build quality is premium, don't get me wrong I love my S3 but I feel the trend appears to be shifting towards premium build quality as well of course what's under the hood
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha.......HTC premium build quality? Are you kidding? Likewise Sony.....you really need to take a look at what users say about them!
Who the heck wants a phone with a glass back? Or a battery you can't change that is under power in the first place.... peeling screens?...ask HTC......washed out display with poor viewing angles, poor battery life...ask Sony........I think by premium feel you mean heavy?! Plastic absorbs shock, cheap to replace and sure as he'll won't break like glass!
Ok each to his own, not impressed with the size, I wish they had kept the same size as s3. However listening to the specs, and hardware of the beast, I seriously felt as though my s3 was 5 years older. Let's be honest Sammy pulled one right out of the hat with the s4.
android167 said:
Not impressed at all :/ Most of the features are software related, so we can expect that for our SGS3.
I'll go with HTC One...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What?
CPU is octa-core instead of quad, 2GB ram instead of 1GB, 1080 screen instead of 720, better wifi, bluetooth and LTE. Hardware has had significant upgrade AND lots of software changes, iPhone releases are incremental, this is pretty substantial as far as I am concerned.
marvi0 said:
Ok each to his own, not impressed with the size, I wish they had kept the same size as s3. However listening to the specs, and hardware of the beast, I seriously felt as though my s3 was 5 years older. Let's be honest Sammy pulled one right out of the hat with the s4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S4 is narrower, thinner and lighter with the same height as the S3
jonny68 said:
As I mentioned this is just my own personal view, I just think it does not feel premium for the money you are paying, other manufacturers like HTC and Sony have released smartphones that are not only quality under the hood but also the build quality is premium, don't get me wrong I love my S3 but I feel the trend appears to be shifting towards premium build quality as well of course what's under the hood
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Premium feel? Using Turkey foil to make a phone aluminium is the cheapest metal to use its extremely soft and offers no protection why do you think car bumpers are made of plastic, not aluminium? Because plastic absorbs impact.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
slaphead20 said:
Ha ha.......HTC premium build quality? Are you kidding? Likewise Sony.....you really need to take a look at what users say about them!
Who the heck wants a phone with a glass back? Or a battery you can't change that is under power in the first place.... peeling screens?...ask HTC......washed out display with poor viewing angles, poor battery life...ask Sony........I think by premium feel you mean heavy?! Plastic absorbs shock, cheap to replace and sure as he'll won't break like glass!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lighten up mate you sound like a Samsung fanboy there, by all accounts I wouldn't be buying the HTC one on the basis it has no sd card slot, no removable battery is a bummer but I could live with that but not the sd card slot.
As for the Sony Xperia Z, some users have complained about poor battery life but after a few cycles battery life by all accounts is no worse than the S3 and if you tweak around you'll get even more
I'm a Samsung fan, indeed my last 2 phones have been Galaxy S2+3, but the S4 asides from some cool features is not worth upgrading in my opinion
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
marvi0 said:
Ok each to his own, not impressed with the size, I wish they had kept the same size as s3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you not happy that the S4 is smaller than the S3? :-/
As a materials/metallurgical engineer I have to disagree with your comment. The "softness" of aluminium is exactly what makes it more able to absorb energy. Plastic in car bumpers is more of a cost/weight deal. Anyway, not really related to the S4 just sharing my thoughts!
---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:58 PM ----------
FerroFlux said:
As a materials/metallurgical engineer I have to disagree with your comment. The "softness" of aluminium is exactly what makes it more able to absorb energy. Plastic in car bumpers is more of a cost/weight deal. Anyway, not really related to the S4 just sharing my thoughts!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are correct in saying that the aluminum scratches easily though!
DrDee said:
What?
CPU is octa-core instead of quad, 2GB ram instead of 1GB, 1080 screen instead of 720, better wifi, bluetooth and LTE. Hardware has had significant upgrade AND lots of software changes, iPhone releases are incremental, this is pretty substantial as far as I am concerned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. While CPU does have 8 cores, only 4 of them can work at the same time. So while gaming what you'll get is more powerful quad-core CPU, otherwise there won't be any difference.
Who can be impressed seriously? Only those who never saw the S3... Which is NOBODY here
Sent from my GT-I9100
---------- Post added at 02:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:29 AM ----------
Mubble said:
Are you not happy that the S4 is smaller than the S3? :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you mean SLIMMER?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Plastic have more elastic deformation than metal. So, if you want something more flexible and resistant, it's obvious to use plastic.
What about the improvement at camera?
goja said:
Who can be impressed seriously? Only those who never saw the S3... Which is NOBODY here
Sent from my GT-I9100
---------- Post added at 02:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:29 AM ----------
I guess you mean SLIMMER?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same height (136.6mm), it's narrower (69.8mm vs 70.4mm) and it's thinner (7.9mm vs 8.6mm) so YES it is indeed smaller than the S3.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
jonny68 said:
As for the Sony Xperia Z, some users have complained about poor battery life but after a few cycles battery life by all accounts is no worse than the S3 and if you tweak around you'll get even more
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also looking at the Xperia, but seems it has poor camera for videos and the back made of glass make it as fragile as an iPhone, isn't it..? Battery, ah! What I know is Sony phone consume much less power in deep sleep!
Sent from my GT-I9100
---------- Post added at 02:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 AM ----------
Warhero141 said:
It's the same height (136.6mm), it's narrower (69.8mm vs 70.4mm) and it's thinner (7.9mm vs 8.6mm) so YES it is indeed smaller than the S3.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
0.6mm smaller haha yeah if you want.. Since I'm not a fanboy, for me it's the same.
Sent from my GT-I9100
Smart move by Samsung to release a device with these characteristics. Great hardware, sick soc, huge battery, SD card slot too
I just wish it was a bit more squared off on the edges. Also my hands are small so I don't care about the larger screen. My sgs2s screen is already pushing it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Would people still be complaining?
Seriously, over 90% of the time when I see someone with a phone they have it in a plastic case.
The uproar of the S5 is annoying...if it bothers you that much then get the HTC One which will probably end up in a plastic case.
According to AndroidCentral, the S5 screen is now as bright and good as the Note 3 (which has one of the best screens I've ever used), a better camera, and waterproofing, not to mention theyre still one of the few phones to offer a micro sd slot.
If anything it should have had 3GB ram and started at 32GB instead of 16GB, but in every other instance it looks like a solid device.
It does not need metal, but pls not that ugly, even moto g looks better
Samsung is only caring about our money, how to make the most money
I'd go out and say that it looks worse than the S4
Well look at my thread HERE... looks like we may be getting a metal one in May
hamad138 said:
It does not need metal, but pls not that ugly, even moto g looks better
Samsung is only caring about our money, how to make the most money
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung has the most aftermarket accessories out of any company other than Apple.
On ebay you can buy a replacement battery door that suits your needs for less than $5.
I dont know, the black looks pretty good to me.
seoulbrova said:
Would people still be complaining?
Seriously, over 90% of the time when I see someone with a phone they have it in a plastic case.
The uproar of the S5 is annoying...if it bothers you that much then get the HTC One which will probably end up in a plastic case.
According to AndroidCentral, the S5 screen is now as bright and good as the Note 3 (which has one of the best screens I've ever used), a better camera, and waterproofing, not to mention theyre still one of the few phones to offer a micro sd slot.
If anything it should have had 3GB ram and started at 32GB instead of 16GB, but in every other instance it looks like a solid device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waterproof because that's an issue the masses have right? People jumping on the ones who aren't blindly following samsung are equally as annoying.
It should have better material along with a fresh look. It should have a newer version of TW that looks/ feels new and doesn't crush 8+GB of storage. It should focus a little on the sound quality.
The HTC One had a totally revamped design and revamped version of Sense and it only won smartphone of the year. If this phone didn't say Samsung, it would be a huge fail
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
seoulbrova said:
Samsung has the most aftermarket accessories out of any company other than Apple.
On ebay you can buy a replacement battery door that suits your needs for less than $5.
I dont know, the black looks pretty good to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The back cover isn't the problem, like you said most are going to use a case. I certainly will buy the Buckdroid and the Otter Box Defender also don't confuse waterproof with water resistant. It's "only" water resitant not water proof.
I don't want metal. Metal = heavier. I would have like a thin bezel though...
I don't mind the plastic at all. Too many people complain about it not being metal. Plastic is lightweight, less prone to scratches or damages when dropped, and you can remove the cover for the battery/SD card, which is always a good thing.
seoulbrova said:
Would people still be complaining?
Seriously, over 90% of the time when I see someone with a phone they have it in a plastic case.
The uproar of the S5 is annoying...if it bothers you that much then get the HTC One which will probably end up in a plastic case.
According to AndroidCentral, the S5 screen is now as bright and good as the Note 3 (which has one of the best screens I've ever used), a better camera, and waterproofing, not to mention theyre still one of the few phones to offer a micro sd slot.
If anything it should have had 3GB ram and started at 32GB instead of 16GB, but in every other instance it looks like a solid device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People aren't complaining because of plastic. The problem is the hype created becacuse of rumored UHD screen, 64bit processor, a giant battery and even the deal Sammy made with Google. I don't know if 3gb are really is necessary or not, I never used more than 1.3GB but 32GB of storage would be nice. Maybe it's because of the new rumored Galaxy F, they say the GS5 will be cheaper than the GS4 so it kinda makes sense.
no, the material is no problem for me.
what maters to me is:
1. back cover design. I'm not type of people who like to use colorful case, I like the transparent one so when I use my phone, people will know what phone I'm using. And that design is not work for me. I personally more like pattern of the S4 back cover. It feels more elegant to my eyes. And don't say those faux leather in note 3. I like it almost. So if the S5 use those like in note 3. I'll be more attract to s5 rather than z2.
2. the battery. It's already boosted 200 mAh from the s4. That's great but not enough. I own myself a S4. It's pretty durable when use power saving mode. but that's where I hate it. When in power saving mode. When I move from outdoor to an indoor place. The screen is very2 dark and I almost can't see it. I don't know about this mode in S5, or the stamina mode in sony device. If same as in my S4, then I need bigger battery for my next phone so I can use it in full day without those power saving things.
3. As like many other people in xda discuss it about when it's first implemented. knox things. I hate when samsung finally use it. I know it's just a flag, but I didn't know how the regulation about that knox warranty here in my country. And if that knox used as one of main upgrade (like that knox countainer in S4 upgrade from 4.2.2 to 4.3), obviously we here can't use it. And make the upgrade less.. useful I guess. Since phone performance will not dramatically change because the phone still have same component
tarpon6 said:
I don't want metal. Metal = heavier. I would have like a thin bezel though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree. Plastic is tougher and lighter.
dandroid13 said:
People aren't complaining because of plastic. The problem is the hype created becacuse of rumored UHD screen, 64bit processor, a giant battery and even the deal Sammy made with Google. I don't know if 3gb are really is necessary or not, I never used more than 1.3GB but 32GB of storage would be nice. Maybe it's because of the new rumored Galaxy F, they say the GS5 will be cheaper than the GS4 so it kinda makes sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing is, who put out these rumors? Samsung never hinted at any of these.
If the phone were metal, it would be metal. Samsung has always used a good grade of plastic for their high end devices and I prefer plastic over metal for my phone. The design is not ugly either, to me it is a decent design but it's also an uninspiring design looking at two factors.
1. Samsung claimed that the S5 would have a new design, claiming they will go back to the basics with this design.
2. The design looks like the past offerings. I understand brand identity, but aside from the back and the usb port, the design almost matches the S4 and a smaller version of the Note 3.
its not about metal or plastic , its about the design it self :silly:
yahyoh said:
its not about metal or plastic , its about the design it self :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But thinking about it, the resulting design is very logical as opposed to the wet dreams of forumers, it's a mix between the S4 and the Note 3 with a few new elements. As logical as it gets. Not very exciting, but probably a rather good design choice usability wise.
Rippley05 said:
Waterproof because that's an issue the masses have right? People jumping on the ones who aren't blindly following samsung are equally as annoying.
It should have better material along with a fresh look. It should have a newer version of TW that looks/ feels new and doesn't crush 8+GB of storage. It should focus a little on the sound quality.
The HTC One had a totally revamped design and revamped version of Sense and it only won smartphone of the year. If this phone didn't say Samsung, it would be a huge fail
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
judging by the released shots of the next gen HTC one, it looks nearly identical to this generations.
Waterproof isnt an issue? Do you know how many people get denied service on their phones for "water damage" even though the phones were never dropped in water? I've had it happen to me multiple times merely because steam/rain/humidity turn the sensors on to indicate water damage even though Ive made sure they never got wet.
People can be such hypocrites sometimes, everyone was bashing the iPhone for being the same thing over and over again, then it was samsung and everyone hailed the HTC one, now they are going to release the exact same phone let's hear how they gonna defend that. Problem is its very hard and costly to come out with different designs especially when you're releasing more than one device a year. I don't like the s5 and don't think will buy it
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk
I don't care about plastic or metal but let's face ever since the s3 samsung has put out extremely fragile phones that are prone to cracking. The s2 was made from plastic but it could take a beating not the s3 or s4. I use to see cracked iPhone 4 screens but since the iPhone 5 I see less cracked iphones and more and more cracked Samsung's.
The Nexus 5 is made from plastic but it has a very nice feel and feels more durable
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
If it was metal then when it falls and reach the floor the repair cost will be double at least...
...the tiny italic text...
Metal is overrated.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Hi All,
Coming from an old Galaxy S2 and comparing the specs, the Z3C is slightly thicker than my S2. How does it feel in your hands? Does it seem clunky due to the thickness?
ChiGGz said:
Hi All,
Coming from an old Galaxy S2 and comparing the specs, the X3C is slightly thicker than my S2. How does it feel in your hands? Does it seem clunky due to the thickness?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really.
Not at all.
If anything, it's too thin. There isn't a lot to grab on to.
Not at all - I can hold it pretty comfortably.
I don't know, as mine is still out for delivery.
However, I am using a Kyocera Hydro Vibe as an interim phone, and like you I am coming from a Galaxy SII. The Hydro Vibe is roughly the same dimensions as the Z3C, and I can tell you, I prefer the Vibe's size over that of the GSII. This link might help you get a better idea of of how the phones stack up with each other.
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/si...IBE,Samsung-Galaxy-S-II/phones/8744,8641,5106
ChiGGz said:
Hi All,
Coming from an old Galaxy S2 and comparing the specs, the X3C is slightly thicker than my S2. How does it feel in your hands? Does it seem clunky due to the thickness?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I'm coming from (still using) a Jolla, which is +3.7L,+3.1W,+1.3D (mm) larger than the Z3C. and the latter feels massively more compact. Personally I find it too thin.
Relative to your SII, the Z3C. is +2L,-1.2W,+0.1D (mm). Slightly longer (not really relevant for handling), less wide ... and if you think you can feel 0.1mm thicker ... you're more sensitive than me. I'd say you shouldn't have any concerns at all. It should feel less 'clunky' than the SII due to being less wide.
Heck, I'd even take an extra millimeter or two, if it meant I could get something more than this paltry, meager two day battery life.
Thin is overrated.
Coming from an HTC One S, thickness is great, the former I had to use with a case as it was actually too thin. I was surprised by the weight of the Z3C though.
Thick my xperia neo v
Sent from my MT11i using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Kev1000000 said:
If anything, it's too thin. There isn't a lot to grab on to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto - I can't wait for my case to come in tomorrow.
Half tempted to ask a friend to 3D print something to give it a curved back.
stormbeta said:
Ditto - I can't wait for my case to come in tomorrow.
Half tempted to ask a friend to 3D print something to give it a curved back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone come from the m7?
I love the curve on that...but the m8 is kinda...odd to me
degraaff said:
Thin is overrated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bingo! Totally agree.
Definitely not too thick, any thinner and I'd get agitated
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
Sometimes I feel it's too thin. Together with it being slippery, it makes it hard to pick it up from a table.
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
marumari said:
Heck, I'd even take an extra millimeter or two, if it meant I could get something more than this paltry, meager two day battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. I won't mind it being 1 or 2 mm thicker if they use that extra thickness to good use, like filling it up with battery goodness, or maybe even wireless charging.
I don't fully agree with the present trend of bigger display sizes, thinner phones and QHD. A little over-kill, IMO.
Had it in my hands all night, it needs more beef ... Too worried about not having not enough grip.
Feels great in the hand. I'd say the thickness is spot on. Feels well-built and solid.
Not too thick and not too thin. Perfect for me. It looks thin though sitting on a table. I think it is due to it's sandwich style.