As it says above
Uff, don't ask that... Op's and dev doesn't like it and it is a little rude.
Sent from my U8800 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
As with most things open source, it will be released when it is ready. Google Cyanogen rule # 1.
Related
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/03/28/google-pushes-source-code-of-android-4-0-4-into-aosp/
Hmmmm.... A noob question real quick:
Does this mean that we'll see stable custom clean ICS ROMs (meaning without TW and without the SPen) shortly or do we still need to wait for Samsung's official ICS release for drivers and stuff?
AOSP issues should be easier to resolve if nit completely fixed
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Don't think it will be quicker
The kernel is not open source and the kernel is what controls the drivers so we will still be waiting for the galaxy note kernel source
However hopefully the note ics will be based on this build
Maybe this is what samsung was waiting for
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
nandihno said:
Don't think it will be quicker
The kernel is not open source and the kernel is what controls the drivers so we will still be waiting for the galaxy note kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel IS open source, and the GPL compels them to release the source code. However this doesn't need to be until the upgrade is officially released, expected sometime in Q2
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app
Thread Closed
Please use the ICS news sticky!
Is Motorola defy and defy+ officially supported by cyanogen for new cm9 RC builts? Edit: can we expect new cm10 unofficial builts??
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
Rule #1 on CyanogenMod:
NO ETA
and defy is not officially supported (yet?)
hsrars-d said:
Rule #1 on CyanogenMod:
NO ETA
and defy is not officially supported (yet?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edited...
My post now...
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
I think we can expect JellyBean builds by Epsylon3, he posted somewhere--
Eppy said Cm9 RC1 would be incoming for the defy on the cm9 thread
MotorolaDefyLuke said:
Eppy said Cm9 RC1 would be incoming for the defy on the cm9 thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U mean official cyanogenmod9?
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
Yes, read the cm9 post
MotorolaDefyLuke said:
Yes, read the cm9 post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link plz...give me the post's link...anyone?
And if we get ics officially from cyanogen...cm10 will be available for us..i just read that devices with official cm9 support will have cm10 as well. [Official cyanogen announcement ]
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
ibthink its still questionable that we will get official cm support, but id say that well definitely get jb (cm10) builds by eppy and quarx, since they managed to get cm9 working with full hwa, and afaik jb is not that different driver/sw wise. only uncertain thing is project butter, and that depends on whether its possible to port it via kernel modules.
sent from my cm9 defy...
I couldn't find the link so here I am, reposting the 3.0.31 Kernel for our Ace.
It was a fake
Impulse1020 said:
It was a fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
???
Rishabh13 said:
???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not the real 3.0 kernel.
It is only a modded 2.6 kernel to looks like the 3.0 one.
And if it is the real kernel you must post the sources.XDA rules!
Psyke and erikcas did research on that and its fakr..."devs" of that kernel changed only number to 3.0 and built kernel..so dont be so naive.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
They should close this thread
Fake 3.0 kernel, close this thread asap. This was just a modification of the makefile to show the 3.0. Not true!
Thanks, biel.
Enviado desde mi Nexus 7 usando Tapatalk 2
Well guys, don't just start firing at him. Probably op didn't knew this. Just calm down.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
We aer not firing at him,just explaning..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Oh. Didn't know that. Anyways, even if its a real 3.x kernel, I got it off another post for some ROM. In that case, if I'm unable to find that thread (the thread being my source) how exactly am I supposed to state the sources? After all, entire reason for this thread is that I couldn't find the other one.
n0p3zz said:
Psyke and erikcas did research on that and its fakr..."devs" of that kernel changed only number to 3.0 and built kernel..so dont be so naive.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I got trolled :laugh:
Impulse1020 said:
And if it is the real kernel you must post the sources.XDA rules!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not XDA rules, it's GPL rules.
Thread closed link removed because op is not the developer for the kernel and no source. Also appears it is not what was stated to be.
Download location
http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch-preview/daily-preinstalled/current/
Current Build :Build 140 (29/05/13)
Changelog: http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch-preview/daily-preinstalled/current/raring-preinstalled.changelog
Build 140 is online.
Development section means if you made it, it goes here. If these were builds you compiled yourself, it'd be a different story. But this thread really shouldn't be here, sorry mate.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
MikeyCriggz said:
Development section means if you made it, it goes here. If these were builds you compiled yourself, it'd be a different story. But this thread really shouldn't be here, sorry mate.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about this. Can moderator please move this to general?
Just a note for everyone. The latest build includes initial 3g Support (GPRS). Builds 147 and 146 to be exact.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Is there a list of ported android devices?
Sent from my GT-P3100 using xda app-developers app
Let's say I have one of these daily build installed, how do I update it to the next one with multirom?
I mean, do I need to delete the current version that I have and install the new one or can I just dirty flash it?
Also, does anybody knows when a usable version of Ubuntu touch will be available.
Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
dj_ghosie said:
Sorry about this. Can moderator please move this to general?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PM a moderator and request that they move the thread.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Out of Beta !!!
Also they have a "special install tool.
Mod Edit: Links removed: The MIUI kernel should not be linked to from xda, it is in violation of GPL and therefore violates xda rules.
kdkinc said:
Out of Beta !!!
Also they have a "special install tool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate. Is the install tool important? Or can we flash via recovery..
Also have they ironed out the smoothness issue?
Thanks bro!
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
Install way sucks
Gesendet von meinem X909 mit Tapatalk 4 Beta
Entropy512 said:
You were probably unaware of this, but in general, discussion of official MIUI is generally not permitted here since MIUI are consistent GPL violators.
Unofficial MIUI ports that include kernel source in compliance with the GPL are OK, however, unless something has changed, all official MIUI releases violate the GPL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^