www.change.org/petitions/wwwsamsung...ndwich-version-for-users-of-the-samsung-i9000
I'm thinking if we bother samsung enough with tweets about ics, they may give it to us, kinda like htc did with the desires gb update or unlocking bootloaders. Start up #neveragain again and get people to sign the petition and we may get ics (or at least galaxy s will, which may help us). We have comparable hardware and it is bs that they say our hardware is not compatible. If they start with the touchwiz excuse, let's tell em to give us aosp.
Most likely won't happen, but worth a shot.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I figure its the least they could do since our devs have gotten mtd to work I think they are just to cheap.
Sent from my OG Epic
It doesn't hurt to try.. 6350 signatures when I went to try and help by signing
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sorry not handing out my street address to some freely public site that anyone can get to... I get enough spam email wise, i don't need it usps as well...
Sent from my Cyanogen Epic.
Speedin07si said:
Sorry not handing out my street address to some freely public site that anyone can get to... I get enough spam email wise, i don't need it usps as well...
Sent from my Cyanogen Epic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, sounds a little sketchy to me. Would like to support but don't wanna go that route.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Forum Runner
I made mine up. And they're not freely available. U can uncheck the public signature option
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
xboxfanj said:
I made mine up. And they're not freely available. U can uncheck the public signature option
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still giving out personal info to a site with no security guarantee or the whole "we will not share your personal info with anyone". And i highly doubt this site had a hand in all the success petitions it says it does.
Sent from my Cyanogen Epic.
I signed with a fake address - but here's the news:
"Samsung has now justified why it cannot give the Ice Cream Sandwich update on both the devices. Galaxy S maybe similar to the Nexus S but Samsung says that "the smartphone and the Galaxy Tab run Samsung specific elements like TouchWiz UI, video calls, Samsung widgets, carrier and country customizations that makes difficult to run the new OS smoothly. The RAM and ROM storage are also an issue", Samsung said.
We are terriblly Sorry for all Galaxy S users who won't be able to get the ICS Official Update, your only chance is to root your Devices and get some ICS tweaked ROMs"
Our best hope is that when devs are done with CM7, they will turn their attentions to CM9. I don't see Samsung releasing ICS for Galaxy S line.
dohturdima said:
I signed with a fake address - but here's the news:
"Samsung has now justified why it cannot give the Ice Cream Sandwich update on both the devices. Galaxy S maybe similar to the Nexus S but Samsung says that "the smartphone and the Galaxy Tab run Samsung specific elements like TouchWiz UI, video calls, Samsung widgets, carrier and country customizations that makes difficult to run the new OS smoothly. The RAM and ROM storage are also an issue", Samsung said.
We are terriblly Sorry for all Galaxy S users who won't be able to get the ICS Official Update, your only chance is to root your Devices and get some ICS tweaked ROMs"
Our best hope is that when devs are done with CM7, they will turn their attentions to CM9. I don't see Samsung releasing ICS for Galaxy S line.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bull****. Then someone needs to petition an Asop build for all Galaxy S devices. Without their gay ass touchwiz. We don't even want touchwiz. LOL.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
dohturdima said:
We are terriblly Sorry for all Galaxy S users who won't be able to get the ICS Official Update, your only chance is to root your Devices and get some ICS tweaked ROMs"
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hold on.....Samsung didn't actually say this, dis they?
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
I just petitioned as well
I made one more geared to what we should have.
https://www.change.org/petitions/sa...s-asop-build-of-the-galaxy-s-and-its-variants
I'm still hunting down email addresses, it's not as easy as it looks getting that kind of info. If anyone can help track down vital emails, I will update the petition with that info.
Related
Does anyone know if gingerbread will be ported to the samsung vibrant or any galaxy s phone. From developers that is. Since the nexus s is almost the same.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I donate to developers so don't troll me
Yes.
10 char.
Not so fast.
Samsung's (latest) official wording seems kind of wishy-washy.
“In case a new version of Android operating system is publicly announced and released, Samsung will review the possibility of implementation of such new version to the existing Samsung products with Android operating system (“Update”). Such a review will be based on various factors including, without limitation, the overall effect of such Update to Samsung products, the system requirements, the structural limitations, and the level of cooperation from the component suppliers and the software licensors. If Samsung decides to make the Update available to the users after such consideration, Samsung will use its efforts to develop such Update, which may be released to the users upon successful completion of such development.”
source: http://www.tmonews.com/2010/12/samsung-and-htc-comment-on-gingerbread-update-plans/
Sounds to me like they're giving themselves a hole to crawl out of. And seeing as how they're struggling to roll out Froyo as it is, they might just say f**k it to Gingerbread.
Although, there would probably be someone here who would port it over in the even that there's not an official update.
s15274n said:
Yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chui101 said:
Not so fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't have to be official. The OP asks whether the developers will port it and likely wasn't referring to Samsung.
Samsung now says it will get gingerbread.
as soon as the Nexus S source is released well see some work from the devs porting it to the SGS.
Shoot i was hoping for Fritter (2.4)
Yeah I don't count on samsung for anything. But making a sexy lookin phone leav the os to the bored computer nerds.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I agree. Using a custom rom instead of a stock rom is a must.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using TapatalkPro
Once that Gingerbread steps in to xda. We will have a custom rom of it. lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Samsung Italy has announced which devices they are planning on upgrading to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.
That list is:
Galaxy S II
Galaxy Note
Galaxy Tab 10.1
Galaxy Tab 8.9
Galaxy Tab 7.7
Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source:
http://www.eurodroid.com/2011/10/28/report-samsung-italy-confirms-galaxy-s-ii-android-4-0-update/
This is absolutely ridiculous. Our tablet came out in November of last year. It's less than a year old, and Samsung is dropping us already despite being a member of Google's so-called Update Alliance.
Guess Samsung hasn't changed at all from the old days.
If this pisses you off like it pisses me off, maybe we can shame them if we complain enough on their Facebook and Twitter pages, I already did:
http://www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA#!/SamsungUSA?sk=wall
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall
http://twitter.com/#!/SamsungMobileUS
http://twitter.com/#!/Samsungtweets
In the end, if Samsung drops us like yesterday's garbage, at least we still have our great devs here, like we always have.
I feel very lucky to have the developers!
Updated the post with the Samsung Facebook and Twitter feeds that I complained on.
With Samsung's "galaxy this and galaxy that" devices with different hardware specs you cannot expect the samsung team to come up with updates to each and everyone of them. That is a big nightmare.
As for me I will never again make a mistake in buying a samsung device. Support for an expensive device from samsung really sucks!
And to discover later that the device is not really up to quality and seems "untested" thoroughly adds to the disappointment. Example is the warming of the GT after some time of using. I have to mention that after using a rival tablet(I won't mention the brand) no similar warming happened .
manekineko said:
Samsung Italy has announced which devices they are planning on upgrading to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.
That list is:
Source:
http://www.eurodroid.com/2011/10/28/report-samsung-italy-confirms-galaxy-s-ii-android-4-0-update/
This is absolutely ridiculous. Our tablet came out in November of last year. It's less than a year old, and Samsung is dropping us already despite being a member of Google's so-called Update Alliance.
Guess Samsung hasn't changed at all from the old days.
If this pisses you off like it pisses me off, maybe we can shame them if we complain enough on their Facebook and Twitter pages, I already did:
http://www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA#!/SamsungUSA?sk=wall&filter=12
http://twitter.com/#!/SamsungMobileUS
http://twitter.com/#!/Samsungtweets
In the end, if Samsung drops us like yesterday's garbage, at least we still have our great devs here, like we always have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Complain here too:
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall
omr911 said:
Complain here too:
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Expect your complaint to be deleted asap!
it is expected that galaxy tab 7 wont have it. don't worry a port is coming soon.
omr911 said:
Complain here too:
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, added it to the original post.
I would be just happy with sammy providing a official rom for the latest gb. I am asking even ics.
So I recently started thinking a lot about the fragmentation and it is whole mess. Everyone not just google is to blame. I will hardly consider getting android again until this gets resolved some way.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Can't we just get the damn drivers and source code... I trust the Dev community way more than any mfg
Sent from my rooted Nexus1
If we can get the driver source code, we should be able to build ics for tab, just like almost any modem computer can run linux...
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
droid512 said:
Can't we just get the damn drivers and source code... I trust the Dev community way more than any mfg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After the official Gingerbread update for the GT-P1000 I am kind-of glad that Samsung are not touching the ol' 7".
I too prefer to put my faith in the development community. Look at Technomancer's CM7 port. That ROM really kicks some ass.
Opensource FTW!!!
We know that the Galaxy Tab is a powerful device as much as other devices that has been upgrade coming soon. This movement isn't good for Samsung because everybody will not trust in them. I think they have the best hardware in the market, but actually there are other companies that have work too hard, as Sony Ericsson.
shame on samsung
Just tested alpha2 of the first ics port - no network for data yet, but smooth feeling on p1000 - glad I bought that one ;-)
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
frake said:
Just tested alpha2 of the first ics port - no network for data yet, but smooth feeling on p1000 - glad I bought that one ;-)
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! I will try it soon.
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
Used the Galaxy Tab P1000 before... changed to EVO3D (Asian edition cannot be hacked)... regret it to the max... who the hell wants to unlock the bootloaders from htcdev.com and void their warranty.. .definitely not me...
HTC, nice build quality, but really for a 1.2GHz dual core, it still kind of laggy... probably my hacked out Tab P1000 works much smoother... plus, with all the hacking and flashing and bricking my device TWICE, still manage to get warranty repairs by Samsung...
had the EVO3D for only 2 months.. just got rid of it and bought the shiny new Galaxy Tab Plus... this dual core tab really kicks some ass... and manage to root it easily...
multi tasking on the fly.. do you see the bar at the bottom, click on it and easy access to mini apps over your current running apps.... Nice...
I am never a brand fanboy, been using HTC since like forever, but the increasing "LOCKED" bootloaders philosophy by HTC is getting on my nerves... they forget, many gadget freaks are buying Android phones for their "customization and being open source"...
at time being, will stick to Samsung, and will put my faith on XDA developers to bring this device to the next level... long live XDA Developers...
Who needs samsung when you have a bunch of cool devs on XDA
Samsung did not release even 2.3 for Russia..This is funny to wait ICS)
DenimTornado said:
Samsung did not release even 2.3 for Russia..This is funny to wait ICS)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Never had a Gingerbread update here in Australia (but that's my carrier's fault, I think) so jumped straight to Overcome and haven't looked back, apart from the odd dabble in CM7 and a quick run with Honeycomb.
I'm more than happy to wait for the devs to release an ICS build which will probably end up better than anything Samsung could've done anyway.
From SamMobile.com:
"Samsung has announced that both the Galaxy S and the Galaxy Tab can handle the upgrade to Android 4.0 when looking purely at speed of the device.
However the upgrade will not arrive on these devices simply because certain hardware features will not function.
The quantity of RAM and ROM in this is a big factor.
Some of the Touhwizz functions Samsung uses will not work when combined with Android 4.0 and one of these devices."
http://www.sammobile.com/2011/12/22/official-no-android-4-0-for-galaxy-s-and-galaxy-tab/
Let the discussions begin!
I wasn't really expecting ICS :/ I guess this just makes it official that we won't get it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
So take off touchwiz samfail!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Everything they just listed as an issue why it can't get the upgrade is a load of ****.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
yup.. i'm running an early alpha of a CM9 based ICS on my Tab and it runs fine for not having hardware acceleration etc. So I know the same applies for the Epic. Sad that Samsuck just doesn't feel like putting the effort into supporting their devices.. Oh well, hooray capitalism! =P
So, here is their source for the story:
http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/2043
It's in Korean, and reading it through google translate of babelfish is good for a chuckle.
As I interpret it, they say that the Nexus S works because it requires no carrier customization , Touchwiz or region specific features.
Also, from the babel fish translation:
"The soluble memory dosage is insufficient and will provide a satisfied use environment
There is not a possibility.
This considers the hardware evening sunlight, use environment of optimum to the customers provision
Description below being a selection which is inevitable for to understand, wishes."
I think that may mean the phone is near end of life (hardware evening sunlight)
and customers wouldn't like how ICS runs on this hardware anyway.
Oh well, we'll see how CM9 runs.
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
txtmikhail said:
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems fair...
It's really quite sad- Samsung seems to *MAKE* good hardware, they just have a piss-poor software development team.
phdeez said:
Seems fair...
It's really quite sad- Samsung seems to *MAKE* good hardware, they just have a piss-poor software development team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes.. watch in six months when jelly bean come out.. sgs2 nor galaxy tabs will get it because of some bs with hardware/software(TW).. they gonna want us to upgrade to the sgs3 or galaxy tabs v2
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398010,00.asp
pcmag confirms.
MTD roms.........the alternative future?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
sonarchist said:
MTD roms.........the alternative future?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, if there is an ICS port in the next 6 months that's smooth and fully functional I'd go there. But I'm moving on to LTE asap.
Just means no "official" ICS, I'm sure devs will have something for it. I would imagine that most of the people that know what they're missing will be on to new phones by then anyway.
Hopefully they can pull off cm9 for the gs series.
Sent from my AOSP Epic 4G
Samsung just keeps on giving!
This is just Samsung being downright LAZY. Heck the Nexus S is getting ICS from them right? And that is most definitely a Galaxy S phone. They just don't want to be bothered to support the Galaxy S line as a whole anymore clearly.
If we didn't have to worry about touchwiz... it would be here by now... why do we need it when the UI of ICS is far superior. At the very least release the driver source files so that devs can do it for you... Samsung needs to be more open to developers in that regard.
txtmikhail said:
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to this. I skipped the Galaxy Tabs for the same reason...well, that and the fact that they left out micro SD!
avlon said:
+1 to this. I skipped the Galaxy Tabs for the same reason...well, that and the fact that they left out micro SD!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. And hdmi....comes in handy over friends houses..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Keep in mind that this isn't just Samsung's pickiness about having their TW branding. This is also a product of carrier demands. Carriers do NOT like (for the most part) unbranded, undifferentiated phones, and they especially don't like phones that aren't preloaded with software that represents services they provide.
Frankly, I was always convinced that arrangements such as VZN's with the NFL required them to have the app on all relevant phones. The NFL is anal like that.
IOW, it's a LOT of different factors coming together keeping ICS off of Galaxy S phones, many of which are problems with how the smartphone industry itself has come to work, and targeting one player while ignoring the bigger picture--though it sure makes life easier for journalists and bloggers--cheapens the whole conversation.
It's official, we are no longer supported.
Thank you to all DEVs that have been cooking & porting ROMs with the latest. Without you, my phone would be an expensive and out-of-date purchase.
Would I ever buy another Sammy phone? Maybe, they do seem to have great specs compare to others.
Cheers.
can you provide with the link of the info???
Agreed thanks devs for all the hard work! Thanks for giving us yummy ics
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
flexxoo said:
can you provide with the link of the info???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's one from Android Matters, http://www.droidmatters.com/news/galaxy-s-and-galaxy-tab-will-not-get-ice-cream-sandwich-says-samsung/
I've read this on many other news websites, just Google it.
Is this the Death Blow?
Huffington Post - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1183578.html
ComputerWorld - http://blogs.computerworld.com/19513...urce=rss_blogs
Once again... This is news for the International Version of Galaxy S. Our beloved Vibrant was left out way back in the Froyo Days. The International at least got GB source released and even official for all but the Vibrant.
So sorry if this is rude but, this is no news to us Vibrant owners.
Samsung hasnt really made the final verdict yet.. thoae links you showed were later overturned by overwhelmingly bad response from the community.. sasumg said they might reconsider
Sent from a cell tower to the XDA server to you.
read the news today?
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...-includes-face-unlock-and-other-ics-features/
seems like samsung had (or has?) been working on some GB/ICS features for the i9000 series.
Can't complain, it's official software, whether it was leaked legitimately or not. This may be a very good sign for us.
GPS Fail
[ROM][07-JAN][4.0.3] ICS (Ice Cream Sandwich) Passion v10.6 - Proof it can and does work just fine on Galaxy S hardware.
As far as leaving out Touch Whiz... I seriously doubt most would consider that a deal breaker . Leave it out if it won't fit. That reason is too lame to explain why official updates just stopped so early in this phone's life.
It is simple in my mind. Samsung screwed the pooch on 10,000,000 phones with the faulty GPS hardware they chose to stick into these phones. All roms, from the "official" garbage Samsung's put to the excellent roms from brilliant developers like the one above, can never seem to get the GPS in these phones working properly.
Samsung wants 10 million Galaxy S phones to just go away, so we'll stop asking them when they're finally going to fix the gps.
Samsung gave up on the Galaxy S long ago.
You know what, the devs here are crazy awesome. They've basically put a stable NON-TOUCHWIZ ICS on our devices (passion and a couple others but passion in particular) and I couldn't be more thankful as I am not well off and have to buy older devices to keep my android addiction fixed thanks devs for all that you do. We truly appreciate you guys
Sending my love from Texas <3
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Flash ICS passion and call it a day. GPS works, mute/unmute is being worked on.
I've been running it for a week and its silky smooth
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
JettyLife said:
Flash ICS passion and call it a day. GPS works, mute/unmute is being worked on.
I've been running it for a week and its silky smooth
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, I've been out of the vibrant loop for a bit. What is the best/most stable daily driver for you guys?
vinas1 said:
So, I've been out of the vibrant loop for a bit. What is the best/most stable daily driver for you guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most stable rom for me (and not only me) is by far Bionix 1.3.1. After all the roms that i tried(2.3 or ics) Bionix is still the best with no bugs and working gps
vinas1 said:
So, I've been out of the vibrant loop for a bit. What is the best/most stable daily driver for you guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Passion still has a few bugs to work out, but otherwise it's the best rom I've ever had on my Vibrant.
gatorbob said:
Passion still has a few bugs to work out, but otherwise it's the best rom I've ever had on my Vibrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Remember that GPS works* for ICS but with an asterisk! Once your phone goes to deep sleep, GPS won't work until you reboot your phone and use it immediately (before any deep sleep). This is a highly accepted observation.
Support for phones
It's official, we are no longer supported.
Not supporting Sammy but.... I've found this problem (little or no support) with anything that is electronic a common practice. These companies are pushed buy sellers and yes the consumer to come up with the next 'latest and greatest'.
Appliances, TV's, modems, routers, computers... you name it, after months of support Sammy and the like, move along and let the buyer find resources to upgrade.
and so a +1 to your following statement and DEVs'
Thank you to all DEVs that have been cooking & porting ROMs with the latest. Without you, my phone would be an expensive and out-of-date purchase.
+1
Thanks for all the replies... Going to check out a couple of the recommended ROMs tonight. Thanks again!
Sign the petition!
You can sign the petition and see if we can get ICS on the Galaxy S!
change.org/petitions/samsung-were-asking-you-bring-the-galaxy-s-users-an-update
Read this article about Samsung releasing an "update pack" for Galaxy S users...
androidpolice.com/2012/01/07/samsung-galaxy-s-value-pack-update-leaked-brings-minor-ui-changes-face-unlock-and-more/
amg-android said:
You can sign the petition and see if we can get ICS on the Galaxy S!
change.org/petitions/samsung-were-asking-you-bring-the-galaxy-s-users-an-update
Read this article about Samsung releasing an "update pack" for Galaxy S users...
androidpolice.com/2012/01/07/samsung-galaxy-s-value-pack-update-leaked-brings-minor-ui-changes-face-unlock-and-more/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean this Petition?
News Sources are in Post #4 and I-9000 "Value Pack" story is in Post #6
Also I have been pounding AndroidPolice (also in Post #6)in both the Val-Pack story's comments and also on G+. I have seen several people from the G+ article +1'ing me and some of the names i have also seen on the petition's comments. So it is working.
Edit: Just went in and we are at 1132 signatures. That is a little under 100 today alone.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...hing-standing-in-the-way-now-is-your-carrier/
Don't flame me but from what I'm reading from credible android police, the og tab is eligible for an ics upgrade meaning its possible OFFICIALLY but its up to carrier. Now thats what i deduce from what i read, i just know if they are referring to the Gtab 2.I could be reading it wrong though. Any one willing to weigh in?
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Well ayysir, I read it the same way. Some notes, though:
The GTab 7 version 2 already comes with ICS. There is no reason to make a press release about that. Also, given that Samsung has provided ICS ROMs does not mean they will actually surface as well.
This does increase the chances of official ICS on our devices very much. Lol, I think no one was expecting them to actually deliver (in the end) on the promise they made at launch time (GB and HC/ICS support)...
Curious, funny and already useless due to CM9 already being better than whatever Samsung might have released. Sorry to say but I think this is too little too late. Good find though.
The puritans ( who never flash or root devices :-D ) will probably have a field day, for sure. We might end up ripping stuff from it like proprietary code (codecs anyone?) and bundled apps as well, since that would be legal after proper release, but that's just not really that interesting anymore...
This might also clear out Samsung's reputation on failing to provide proper device support. What do you think?
C.
I call a miss print. Samsung have said there will be no ics for our tab. Samsung Canada aren't gonna make one themselves. someone just didn't have their thinking cap on when they typed up the list.
Would be nice to be proven wrong, but I'm sure I won't be.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk 2
I hope this happens.I have gone back to stock 2.3.6 as I couldn't get skygo to work and missed using my media sync to watch the videos I bought using the gift pack in 5.1 sound. Hopefully they will release a stock ics rom that will retain 5.1 music and video player.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium App
CM9 is better then Official Samsung ICS (if they would).
Samsung is suck!!, CM9 is Rock!!
qm4n76 said:
CM9 is better then Official Samsung ICS (if they would).
Samsung is suck!!, CM9 is Rock!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea but an official port of ICS would possibly help out developers even with getting some features and stuff working
espionage724 said:
Yea but an official port of ICS would possibly help out developers even with getting some features and stuff working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, I know that.,
sorry guys but Samsung already releases a value pack for galaxy tab 7 in Korea :
http://samsungtomorrow.com/2590
Edit:
New Feature Updates
- Face Recognition (Face Unlock): Security is low
- add snapshot capability of video recording
- Added photo editor
how big a noob can you be??
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1618831
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1618122