Well bravo users I looked at the phones at&t is upgrading to 2.3 and we aren't on there. I think it's terrible that the LG phoniex and the pantech crossover ( both with 600 MHz proccessors and 3mp camera) are getting the update. We have to develop a gingerbread rom that is in full working condition.
that could change since motorola got bought by google.
Still unlikely. They will still be their own group and treated as a licensee, which means all that will happen is they get Android code faster then others.
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App
Well the defy is getting it. The bravo and defy are almost equal
Sent from my MB520 using XDA App
No im not sure the defy is getting the update im pretty sure its just the defy plus also why would you want stock bravo gingerbread with MOTOBLUR?? It just slows the phone down and is really annoying
Sent from my MB520 using XDA App
You've got a point. But still we don't have a fully working port of any gingerbread rom and I've heard the new blur interface is really cool.
Sent from my MB520 using XDA App
Because then you can port the camera
Sent from my MB520 using XDA App
hey rdannar have you tried porting the blurcamera.apk from stock 2.2?
we've tried any variation of files we can think of frmo the stock rom and they just won't work with gingerbread because the error is in the kernel compilation
The kernel we're using for the CM7 rom is compiled for the Defy(Jordan) and we need one compiled for the Bravo(Kobe) which is why people were waiting for the gingerbread official update....
When that update is(would have been) launched, the manufacturer is required to post the kernel source... which we could use to fix our cameras...
the only real solution I can think of no ones willing to do; compare 2.2 source code to cm7(2.3.5) source code... it's going to have far to many variations to just pick out the camera segments....
so does that mean your saying we are never going to get a camera fix?? i mean there are TONS of phones that don't have a gingerbread update but do have miui or cm7 so im pretty sure it's possible right?? it's probably a hassle which is why most people dont want to do it like you said, but how long would it really take to port the bravo's camera using stock froyo to miui or gingerbread???
As the one person said it all deals with source code. It takes someone who knows how to code. Right now we don't have someone who does that is willing/has time to do it.
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App
Well... maybe we'll never get the camera working
basil.elsh said:
so does that mean your saying we are never going to get a camera fix?? i mean there are TONS of phones that don't have a gingerbread update but do have miui or cm7 so im pretty sure it's possible right?? it's probably a hassle which is why most people dont want to do it like you said, but how long would it really take to port the bravo's camera using stock froyo to miui or gingerbread???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, take the camera module out of your phone and cell it for spare parts on ebay.
i hope one day we get gingerbread though. theres a new motoblur?
haha i was surprised this phone even got froyo, every person i talked to at at&t said it wouldn't. Then again they also said the captivate was stuck on 2.1. Still, there's no way gingerbread is gonna happen. If it does i will be once again pleasantly surprised.
Related
Hope I don't get flamed for posting about the Incredible here but I figured the devs might be able to port from it.
http://shipped-roms.com/shipped/Incredible/
ericlmccormick said:
Hope I don't get flamed for posting about the Incredible here but I figured the devs might be able to port from it.
http://shipped-roms.com/shipped/Incredible/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it, because even though the OS is the same, the Incredible uses different hardware, is not labeled desirec, and has a different resolution then the Eris.
ericlmccormick said:
Hope I don't get flamed for posting about the Incredible here but I figured the devs might be able to port from it.
http://shipped-roms.com/shipped/Incredible/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks anyway, if it's true they can't use it.
Weren't the current Froyo ROMs ported from the Nexus? That's certainly no more similar to the Eris.
Sent from my FroyoEris using Tapatalk
I know that the hardware is different but so is every other device running Froyo (sanctioned from the manufacturer) but it has been adapted to work on the Eris. If I'm not mistaken though, this is the first Froyo ROM with sense and even though I don't like sense, it doesn't mean others don't want a sense based froyo rom.
Yes a sense based froyo rom would be pretty dang cool
Agreed!
Sent from my Eris using XDA App
It would be sweet that's why I bought my Eris for sense.
I'd be all over a Sense ROM with all the Sense widgets
I agree a froyo port would be very awesome.
If I understand correctly this is the state of froyo for the eris:
All the devices that have gotten froyo + sense have hdpi screen resolutions (http://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screens_support.html) while the eris has an mdpi screen resolution. To port you would have to scale down all the images (lots of them), plus some other tweaks to be able to run it on the eris. Last I read several people have tried to port it (I know Framework43 was trying to port it, and I think koas said he might try to port it). Right now it would be very hard to port, and we *most likely* will not get it until an mdpi device (such as the HTC Legend) gets froyo + sense.
From what I understand this should be beneficial for us getting full on Flash 10.1
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
homewmt said:
I agree a froyo port would be very awesome.
If I understand correctly this is the state of froyo for the eris:
All the devices that have gotten froyo + sense have hdpi screen resolutions (http://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screens_support.html) while the eris has an mdpi screen resolution. To port you would have to scale down all the images (lots of them), plus some other tweaks to be able to run it on the eris. Last I read several people have tried to port it (I know Framework43 was trying to port it, and I think koas said he might try to port it). Right now it would be very hard to port, and we *most likely* will not get it until an mdpi device (such as the HTC Legend) gets froyo + sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the Legend on schedule to get Froyo? Or is it like the Eris where it's not been announced either way?
Well at least its got to make it a little easier to get flash on the Eris with Froyo. Even without the rest of Sense, I'd be ecstatic to see flash or even flash lite on Froyo.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
Thanks for the interesting info, homewmt!
I don't think a Froyo Sense ROM would make it easier to get full Flash on the Eris. The fact of the matter is that Flash was written for the ARMv7 instruction set, and we run ARMv6.
The only reason it's been hacked into Sense based ROMs at all is because of Flash-lite. I don't even think Flash-lite will be a part of Froyo Sense deployments since manufacturers only seem concerned about ARMv7 devices getting the update, which all support official Flash.
I could be wrong about all of that, but I call 'em as I see 'em.
Sent from my ERIS using XDA App
I'm pretty sure Flash-lite just provided a way for the browser to call up Flash 10.1 after it was installed. The version of flash I use on eclair is still intended for only Arm7 and above. It runs slow on the Eris because it's Arm6, but it does run. Then again, maybe that's just my eternal optimism showing since I like everything else about Froyo better.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
carguy88 said:
I'm pretty sure Flash-lite just provided a way for the browser to call up Flash 10.1 after it was installed. The version of flash I use on eclair is still intended for only Arm7 and above. It runs slow on the Eris because it's Arm6, but it does run. Then again, maybe that's just my eternal optimism showing since I like everything else about Froyo better.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the optimism thing.
Personally, I'm not all that jazzed about Flash. It's not REALLY a feature I ever had, so I haven't had a chance to miss it.
That's not to say that I wouldn't be stoked if someone was able to port it to ARMv6, because I would, but at this point, I don't really see it as a "feature" of Froyo.
Kaos and I are trying to port it. We have hit a roadblock for now, but we'll get it eventually.
timmywa said:
Is the Legend on schedule to get Froyo? Or is it like the Eris where it's not been announced either way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is. This has been confirmed for "Q3." If you Google, you'll see rumors pointing toward an October roll-out.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/29/htc-expect-desire-legend-and-wildfire-to-get-froyo-beginning/
Gingerbread was released for Nexus One today...anyone know how long till it hits G2 owners? Being a vanilla phone shouldnt we be next?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Since G2 is an official T-Mo phone, all depends on T-Mo's mood I guess...
It'll be out as a custom ROM sooner than as an official update, I would expect.
Def give it a couple of days let the devs go through the sdk.. Its gonna be a little work moving it over to the g2 because of the physical keyboard and also all the new additions like voip, gyroscope, nfc and all that they gotta make it all work so give it a couple days.. Maybe even something quick tonight..
steviewevie said:
It'll be out as a custom ROM sooner than as an official update, I would expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Although honestly, I'm kinda loving the Desire Z ROM - I don't know if I can go back to the stock camera app, frankly. From the SDK screenshots on the Google blog, it doesn't look like there's any real changes there, either.
Actually, we could be waiting a while. According to cyanogen as well as a lott of other devs, the g2 isn't as vanilla as first thought. There's a lot of HTC crap over it and someof the stuff is designed to look like stock while being something else entirely. The point is, it could take a while for us to get it......at least officially....
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
xSunny said:
Def give it a couple of days let the devs go through the sdk..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SDK isn't the source code though, just the stuff to help you develop Android apps.
Anyone know when the source code usually gets released ? Will it be the day the Nexus S ships ? Or before/after ?
They said it would be coming soon but they said the same for the announcement of 2.3 and that wait felt like forever.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
As a general rule newer versions of android are merged into aosp within a few weeks to a month after the sdk. At least that's what we've historically seen.
It is possible and fairly easy to create a port from the sdk however it tends to be buggy at best.
Once we get a link from an ota from the nexus one we should be able to put together a proper port.
If you're waiting for Cyanogenmod you'll be waiting til 2.3 hita aosp as steve and company build directly from the source.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
rp1783 said:
As a general rule newer versions of android are merged into aosp within a few weeks to a month after the sdk. At least that's what we've historically seen.
It is possible and fairly easy to create a port from the sdk however it tends to be buggy at best.
Once we get a link from an ota from the nexus one we should be able to put together a proper port.
If you're waiting for Cyanogenmod you'll be waiting til 2.3 hita aosp as steve and company build directly from the source.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well yeah lets see since the nexus one is pretty similar visually to the g2 instead of the hardware keyboard we have we should def be able to switch around the update nd use it for us =] cant wait!
I'm with @THE ORANGE BANDIT...im loving sense...I also don't know if I would go back to it...but than again I could just switch back and fourth between gingerbread and sense
sent from t-mobile g2 using HTC sense
T-Mobile reps told me when I bought the G2 that it was going to be getting the OTAs first, along with the MT4G. So you can possibly expect enomther to release it first.
Azrael3123 said:
Actually, we could be waiting a while. According to cyanogen as well as a lott of other devs, the g2 isn't as vanilla as first thought. There's a lot of HTC crap over it and someof the stuff is designed to look like stock while being something else entirely. The point is, it could take a while for us to get it......at least officially....
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source?
If there's no source theres no proof.
omarsalmin said:
source?
If there's no source theres no proof.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source? Source for what? Whether the G2 is stock android? That isn't speculation, at this point its a fact that it isn't "clean" android. If you want to be sure of that, just read cyanogens posts in his thread or the nightly discussions. Gingerbread will need to be ported to this phone just like with any phone running a custom ui albeit faster though because HTC didn't go as far as a whole custom ui. Regardless, I would be willing to bet that gingerbread source is released and ported to cyanogenmod before the G2 gets an OTA.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Even if the stock G2 rom isn't quite as pure as it looks, should that even matter? Isn't the point of something like CM to get AOSP to run on the phone? I was under the impression that CM included very few hacks that are device specific.
Barret7sc said:
Even if the stock G2 rom isn't quite as pure as it looks, should that even matter? Isn't the point of something like CM to get AOSP to run on the phone? I was under the impression that CM included very few hacks that are device specific.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it doesn't matter if your phone is rooted and running a custom rom. I was reffering to the delay for an official gingerbread OTA. That's why I said it would be ported to CM before its officially ported to the G2.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Gingerbread is not out for the Nexus One yet. Also once the source for it is released then the rom makers can start working on it
Azrael3123 said:
No, it doesn't matter if your phone is rooted and running a custom rom. I was reffering to the delay for an official gingerbread OTA. That's why I said it would be ported to CM before its officially ported to the G2.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that. Apparently I am having trouble reading today.
The new nexus will be running stock gingerbread I'm assuming? Or a mashed up version of touchwiz :vomit: / gingerbread
[G2/HTC Vision]
luis86dr said:
The new nexus will be running stock gingerbread I'm assuming? Or a mashed up version of touchwiz :vomit: / gingerbread
[G2/HTC Vision]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, stock Android on 2.3
As im sure many of you know that trip left x10 to get a new device bc he got pissed. But his ROMs were amazing no doubt, but couldnt someone use his base and pick up where he left off? Yes im aware other devs have some miui ROMs, but im talking specifically trips base. Im sure plenty of people including myself have his latest download on their computer before he took them off.. just a suggestion and not trying to piss anyone off.
aval1392 said:
As im sure many of you know that trip left x10 to get a new device bc he got pissed. But his ROMs were amazing no doubt, but couldnt someone use his base and pick up where he left off? Yes im aware other devs have some miui ROMs, but im talking specifically trips base. Im sure plenty of people including myself have his latest download on their computer before he took them off.. just a suggestion and not trying to piss anyone off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can only see one thing...camera. all the rest could be developed by almost everyone
I don't see the point in developing from Trip's base.
The one advantage Trip had over the other MIUI devs was camcorder. Other than that, his and Rdanarr's are almost exactly the same. In fact, I find rdannar's ROM faster than Trip's GB rom was...
In about 2 months Camera/camcorder will come to the X10 thanks to SE, so that'll be fixed too.
In short, Trip's base not at all too different from all the other MIUI ROM's base
I tried miui for a week or so but ended up going back to J's cm7 Tom. Once cm7 is fully complete and stable it will be a great base for all other YB Tom's - especially because everything is built from source.
Sent from my X10 using XDA Premium App
I couldn't stand trip, but I still think this is disrespectful....
jonesycomau said:
I tried miui for a week or so but ended up going back to J's cm7 Tom. Once cm7 is fully complete and stable it will be a great base for all other YB Tom's - especially because everything is built from source.
Sent from my X10 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just to let you know, Trip;s miui was all from base too.
cm7 has along way to go to in order to be compared with trip's gingerbread rom.
there is no other gb rom as stable as trip's
zabihjan said:
will i ever shut up??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, but I wish you would
Thread #2 about Trip I seen this morning.....lame and very pathetic!
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
There currently couple of ICS Roms now in our forum (MIUI, Virtuous, CM9, and CG). But my question is, I am a real beginner when it comes to phone system devs, so, when I tried all the newest version of each ICS Roms, I do not feel any major differences. The camera does not work, same issues with crashing, slowness, and etc. I am not complaining about the issues and bugs, but I am wondering what's the difference between each rom? Are there any major difference? And what are we expecting next for the rom? Camera?
theonlyhan said:
There currently couple of ICS Roms now in our forum (MIUI, Virtuous, CM9, and CG). But my question is, I am a real beginner when it comes to phone system devs, so, when I tried all the newest version of each ICS Roms, I do not feel any major differences. The camera does not work, same issues with crashing, slowness, and etc. I am not complaining about the issues and bugs, but I am wondering what's the difference between each rom? Are there any major difference? And what are we expecting next for the rom? Camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK first of all MIUI ICS is much different then the other ics roms there is more customization in a much easier way and a whole different experience even thought they come from the same source I believe. Now when is comes down to the difference between virtuous and CM9 is the mods and other stuff that you won't notice I personally like virtuous it looks more professional with the mods such as the setting toggle in the notification bar its just me. CG is more of a stock experience so you won't see any mods just pure stock experience. That's the major changes I see and with the bugs I don't really know but there all being worked on with pretty much Feb so if camera doesn't work with one it won't work with the other just give him time I'm sure its coming very soon
Sent from my T-Mobile Mytouch 4G using xda premium
This is where I get partially confused, i was running MIUIce Cream Sandwich (ICS v4.0.1) and have had NO issues whatsoever, the camera works, video recording works, and it is fast as all get out (3200-3300 quad consistent o/c to 1.5GHz). I was trying (and failing thus far) to find the camera framework, and hardware ID information from this ROM and inject it into one of the new ICS ROMs we have available.
what all would i need to pull from MIUIce cream sandwich in order to get a working camera in any of the other ICS roms? i know at least i would need to pull the camera .so files from system/lib, but is there any other completely necessary files that should be pulled to get this to work?
im really hoping that a dev stumbles across this and could point me in the right direction, because the camera CAN work, and i have a feeling i am really close to getting it to work, but i don't have the know how (quite yet) of the more experienced devs here.
i really wish it was as easy as my GS4G was when GB ROM leaks started surfacing, that was a 5 minute fix once the right tools came along lol
foxxx5oh said:
This is where I get partially confused, i was running MIUIce Cream Sandwich (ICS v4.0.1) and have had NO issues whatsoever, the camera works, video recording works, and it is fast as all get out (3200-3300 quad consistent o/c to 1.5GHz). I was trying (and failing thus far) to find the camera framework, and hardware ID information from this ROM and inject it into one of the new ICS ROMs we have available.
what all would i need to pull from MIUIce cream sandwich in order to get a working camera in any of the other ICS roms? i know at least i would need to pull the camera .so files from system/lib, but is there any other completely necessary files that should be pulled to get this to work?
im really hoping that a dev stumbles across this and could point me in the right direction, because the camera CAN work, and i have a feeling i am really close to getting it to work, but i don't have the know how (quite yet) of the more experienced devs here.
i really wish it was as easy as my GS4G was when GB ROM leaks started surfacing, that was a 5 minute fix once the right tools came along lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that you are running a hybrid version that isn't really ics if your camera is working. This would explain why you aren't having the same problems as others running ics roms.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
eqjunkie829 said:
I believe that you are running a hybrid version that isn't really ics if your camera is working. This would explain why you aren't having the same problems as others running ics roms.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt think a hybrid would come up as actual ICS though...?
foxxx5oh said:
i didnt think a hybrid would come up as actual ICS though...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you have to change is the build.prop to say a different version.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
eqjunkie829 said:
All you have to change is the build.prop to say a different version.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know! Thanks for the info!
foxxx50h, were you running the now discontinued Galnet Miui release? If so, I know what you mean. Since I was using that and it was great. The only serious glitch was that the market place crashed whenever you tried to preview the pics.
If you want something like that, Dark_Sys released a newer version, but it reads a GB code and not ICS. And it's quite good and stable. Everything works too. Super great on battery.
madmanmostafa said:
foxxx50h, were you running the now discontinued Galnet Miui release? If so, I know what you mean. Since I was using that and it was great. The only serious glitch was that the market place crashed whenever you tried to preview the pics.
If you want something like that, Dark_Sys released a newer version, but it reads a GB code and not ICS. And it's quite good and stable. Everything works too. Super great on battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the one! You wouldn't happen to have a link for that download, would ya?
Sent from my HTC Mytouch 4G using xda premium
Thanks for the info guys, and I really want to try out the ICS (or hybrid) where the cam works. Other than that, I think all current ROMs have their own forte.
theonlyhan said:
Thanks for the info guys, and I really want to try out the ICS (or hybrid) where the cam works. Other than that, I think all current ROMs have their own forte.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you can buy a Gnex or wait I know I'm starting to envy the Gnex. I'm just waiting for the HTC Ville which (Should) be unveiled at MWC towards the end of this month..It should be an absolute BEAST
i've been using creamed glacier since december as a daily. two main issues on it are the camera and low mic volume - though that comes and goes.
quattro was a mess for me. once booted the setup routine would crash out and widgets would constantly crash the launcher no matter what i tried.
testing out cm9 right now. big problem is that launcher (NOVA even) crashes a lot. otherwise call volume is great. runs decent. one great thing there is that it actually contacts google and restores apps. plus i received an email from google congratulating me on my purchase of a galaxy nexus
Nicgraner said:
Then you can buy a Gnex or wait I know I'm starting to envy the Gnex. I'm just waiting for the HTC Ville which (Should) be unveiled at MWC towards the end of this month..It should be an absolute BEAST
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't Ville got revealed? I think it's pretty much the same as Amaze!? And Google Nexus is expensive still, so I'm thinking about Amaze.
incantevole said:
i've been using creamed glacier since december as a daily. two main issues on it are the camera and low mic volume - though that comes and goes.
quattro was a mess for me. once booted the setup routine would crash out and widgets would constantly crash the launcher no matter what i tried.
testing out cm9 right now. big problem is that launcher (NOVA even) crashes a lot. otherwise call volume is great. runs decent. one great thing there is that it actually contacts google and restores apps. plus i received an email from google congratulating me on my purchase of a galaxy nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL @google, that's pretty legit heih! Yeah, I really want the cam feature, and doesn't Amaze has pretty much the same spec (1.5 dual, and stuff?), so that's my next target, when I collected enough money after I paid my tuition
nm 10chars
Where I currently stand on the Huawei U8800:
So, I first got the U8800 a good number of months ago. I loved the device and started working on it straight away, made some good progress. Then I got lower AS Level results than I was hoping for. And my parents decided to split up. So basically, I needed to work harder at school, and my life was kind of a bit more hectic. I have still been working on the U8800, and I almost got CM7 finished. The only issue was that I had no camera preview (I was building libcamera from source rather than using prebuilt libs). A lot of hard work was put into it, and I can't take all the credit. Tom Giordano (Tom_G), bukington, dzo and stockwell were all helpful through the process (although contrary to popular belief I didn't just copy dzo and stockwell, I implemented things in different ways which I thought were cleaner). I respect all of the other developers despite any misunderstandings in the past. This brings me to where I stand today.
For the last few months, I've still been working on CM7 when I've had time to try and get it ready for 7.2, although that hasn't been often. Trying to fix the camera preview proved to be quite a hard process that resulted in me wanting to kill the phone on several occasions. I never succeeded. While I was doing this, Tom_G was working on CM9 for the ZTE Blade and bukington has been doing some great work on CM9 for the U8800. I've now realised that the port won't be ready for 7.2 and I am therefore abandoning it. THIS DOES NOT MEAN I AM ABANDONING THE U8800 OR CYANOGENMOD FOR IT. I am going to focus my efforts on working with bukington to get CM9 working on it. He has already done a lot of the work and it's looking promising. I will spend as much time as I can on it, but I need quite high grades to get to the University I want to be in, so I am aware that most of my time will still have to be devoted to school.
I am sorry to anyone who I have disappointed with this device, but time really isn't something I've had a lot of in the past 6 or 7 months.
Can or you know how to create a kernel that can fix the problem of the atmel screens on the 2.3.5 roms, and I don't know if you understand what iam speaking about.
Sent from my u8800 using XDA App
vlc_marcos said:
Can or you know how to create a kernel that can fix the problem of the atmel screens on the 2.3.5 roms, and I don't know if you understand what iam speaking about.
Sent from my u8800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know what the problem even is. I'd love to help with it but I'd rather focus on ICS work than kernels for gingerbread. My time is limited now unfortunately.
Ao you are planning to use the 3.0 kernel for the ics version? Because on the 4.0 rim from dzo his kernel is a 2.3.5 version
Sent from my u8800 using XDA App
I have followed you on twitter. Sad things happen
Sent from my Derp using XDA Herp
I saw your post on your G+. I hope you can finish your work soon and get the high grades for the university that you want to be in
Sent from my U8800 using Tapatalk
-sorry for my bad english
Good stuff mate, have seen your updates on buckingtons github. Thanks for all the work and not to sound like an old fart, but good on you for keeping your priorities in order. Personal life and uni is a lot more important than a phone.
If it is all good to let us know, how is Buckingtons ICS port coming along?
Did anybody knows where to find HCDR.JACOB ???? I NEED TO TALK TO HIM.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda app-developers app
sachoosaini said:
Did anybody knows where to find HCDR.JACOB ???? I NEED TO TALK TO HIM.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His Twitter: https://twitter.com/HCDRJacob