Juat got the app HDR camera and man what a difference. Just thought I'd share.
Normal
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
HDR app
Hopefully photobucket didn't degrade the quality
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
I can really see the the difference in the pics even from Tapatalk. I am going to have to check it out. Thanks
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
JohnCorleone said:
I can really see the the difference in the pics even from Tapatalk. I am going to have to check it out. Thanks
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah I couldn't believe how much better it looks. There's also an app call Pro HDR camera as well. Different developer
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
I forgot I had HDR+ but I only tried it once and forgot to re-install between my 3 ROM a day switching. I just added it back and will try it out again now.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
It's a really nice effect but keep in mind that some of it comes at the expense of accuracy. Take the slight greenish halo around the pepsi bottle for example...
Poryhack said:
It's a really nice effect but keep in mind that some of it comes at the expense of accuracy. Take the slight greenish halo around the pepsi bottle for example...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that is just a reflection of the green piece of paper next to the bottle. I see it in both photos.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Edit: Disregard. I see what you mean now that I am looking on a full size monitor.
.
Thanks man...great app. Never liked the depth-to-field in the stock camera. This fixes it all. So this takes like 3 pix at once and combines pixels and hardens the pic?
If it's like ProHDR, it takes the same image at three different exposures (one "too dark," one "normal" and one "too bright"). It combines these to make areas that otherwise would have been too dark or too light look more normal in the final image. These apps (or doing HDR manually afterwards) can really make some scenes look a lot more natural, but they can also overdo it and make them look incredibly fake.
In the OP, notice the sticker in the top left corner and the electrical cord in the bottom right. These were both in "dark" areas of the original, but are brought out much more nicely with the HDR app.
kennyglass123 said:
Thanks man...great app. Never liked the depth-to-field in the stock camera. This fixes it all. So this takes like 3 pix at once and combines pixels and hardens the pic?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no difference in the depth-of-field (not depth-to-field) in either picture.
edonnelly said:
If it's like ProHDR, it takes the same image at three different exposures (one "too dark," one "normal" and one "too bright"). It combines these to make areas that otherwise would have been too dark or too light look more normal in the final image. These apps (or doing HDR manually afterwards) can really make some scenes look a lot more natural, but they can also overdo it and make them look incredibly fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is what HDR does. Takes a picture at -2(or -1) exposure, 0 exposure and +2(or +1) exposure, then combines them. Most HDR pictures DO look extremely fake because it is not how our eyes perceive the image in reality.
Pro HDR is cool, but it takes a long time to take a pic. HDR Camera is a good one. It's fast, and you don't have to stay perfectly still.
In HDR Camera, set the saturation to pure, and the local and micro contrast to low. You'll get an excellent picture that doesn't look HDR.
Here are some examples (Old Town San Diego):
While the HDR effect can be cool, for some shots it would take away from it.
I set it to standard when taking pics at the Cars and Coffee in Irvine, CA. Helped bring out the reflections on the cars:
But yeah, great program.
I see half of an alien face in the top right part of the bottle in the HDR pic!!!!!
I use it for special moments, though when in doubt, I first take a stock pic, then use HDR. Sometimes the differences can be minimal, and a lot of times it can be much obvious that HDR is a better choice.
SchizioPunk's Epic Experience 2.1 Eclair -> Odin to EC05 Froyo. Rooted. Bloatware Removed. Voodoo Sound V9 Module Loaded. TouchWiz4. Enjoying my Customized Stock Experience.
Here's another comparison shot
Normal
HDR
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
IMO it looks like you are either zoomed in on both pictures or your white balance is incorrect. Both pictures look bad... are you set on "Auto" for everything??
algorhythm said:
IMO it looks like you are either zoomed in on both pictures or your white balance is incorrect. Both pictures look bad... are you set on "Auto" for everything??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah I have local and micro contrast on high. And its on pure color vividness
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
jok3sta said:
Yah I have local and micro contrast on high. And its on pure color vividness
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any of those on the stock camera app.
algorhythm said:
I don't see any of those on the stock camera app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant on the hdr app sorry. The stock camera was just the normal settings. The room I took the pic is florescent lit. Not sure if that makes a difference
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
Camera 360 can fake HDR pretty well with just tone mapping.
jok3sta said:
The room I took the pic is florescent lit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does.
algorhythm said:
It does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh thanks for the comparison pic.. maybe its just me but the incandescent lighting looks the best
Tapatalkin' it from my Epic 3g
Related
I can actually say I haven't been able to take 1 clear picture with flash. Is there something wrong with my phone? I have a fairly steady hand, I used to be a DSLR photographer and never had any problems. What gives to this? here are some examples, not even a moving object. These pictures are taken stabilized on my knee
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
R.I.P., Left Shift key.
As a rule, indoor pictures with the Evo are just poor quality. Outside, they're crystal clear, but even with the flash, when you're inside the camera is adjusting the exposure to the ambient light, which means grainy, blurry pics. There are some tweaks you can do to minimize this (white balance, exposure defaults, etc.) but in general it's just not that great.
Same with video: If you're inside, the camcorder drops down to, like, 8-10fps capture. Outside it does much better. It's all about the ambient lighting.
the lighting looks bad, and plus you gotta click in the pic to focus it and then hold down the shutter button untill you see your pic, thats the only way i can take pics
Look closely and see if your lens cover is cracked.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
awakener777 said:
Look closely and see if your lens cover is cracked.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would that matter?
Check out this article, it is a good demonstration of how the lens (or in this case, lens cover) really has a very minimal effect - if any - on image quality.
The only fix is to buy the superior phone...
inb4cantmakecalls
Classick206 said:
The only fix is to buy the superior phone...
inb4cantmakecalls
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're being sarcastic, right? Surely a troll would get 41 posts without being found out.
Are you using the netarchy kernel? I have had similar issues with photos using flash with fresh and the netarchy kernel. Switching back to stock fixed it for me.
SilverZero said:
You're being sarcastic, right? Surely a troll would get 41 posts without being found out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I'm a troll because I can identify a better phone when I see one?
If you were a good troll, you would be doing this on the iPhone site about an EVO. You might just make a few iP4 users' heads explode.
wow ip4 a better phone really go back to your hole in the wall oh wait no ur still stuck behind the walled garden
Classick206 said:
So I'm a troll because I can identify a better phone when I see one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A better phone? No. Takes better pics and video, yes. Taking better pics / video doesn't make you a better phone. Making calls with reception makes a better pho... oh wait
SilverZero said:
Why would that matter?
Check out this article, it is a good demonstration of how the lens (or in this case, lens cover) really has a very minimal effect - if any - on image quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because mine is cracked and it true focusing on the crack, rather than the subject.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
i cant beleive, or i missed, no one pointing this out.
you are friggin shaking in the picture dude.
no picture will look good when there is movement.
but i side with you, my camera compared to my wifes camera is garbage.
my wifes takes consistantly better video and stills than mine does.
mine will show the camera focusing and all it does is focus near then far, then stops, it never stops on the right focus point, you can see where it focuses right on past it.
if there was a hack to allow a slider for focus that would be kick ass.
after some time and practice it would be easy to use the slider for focus.
but my shots such ass, big time.
if i Zoom in it will focus much better than if it isnt.
so i am not sure where the focus point is compared to where you place your finger but it isnt where you place your finger thats for sure.
It sounds like a problem my phone seemed to have in the beginning; it would focus and then stop auto focus a little blurry. I don't know what fixed it, but after I had the phone a few weeks, the issue seemed to go away. Now I can take pretty clear and amazingly focused photos.
As for the iPhone troll, I ignored him as I was on a website viewing some flash content on my phone just after I got done with a video conference on 3G . I then made a phone call and held the phone with both hands without dropping the call.
Classick206 said:
So I'm a troll because I can identify a better phone when I see one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wondering why you would post on the Evo forum only to say that the iPhone is better, especially when it's really subjective to say that. You must admit, that is rather troll-ish.
Classick206 said:
The only fix is to buy the superior phone...
inb4cantmakecalls
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do know that the camera tech is almost identical? Only thing that is changing the "quality" of the pictures/video is software + compression.
Another typical oblivious iPhone user...
Hi, I decided to buy SGS II as soon as it will be on stock in my country. For now there is so few reviews with full res. photos. Many people will be glad to see camera quality from real users. So please share some photos with us. Many THX
PS: Its not condition, but only full 8Mpx resolution photos show the real quality and amount of detail and sharpness of the photos.
Here are some untouched Macro shots taken in my backyard in fading light with the Galaxy S II, was a bit windy so the flowers kept moving:
Click for full sized image
Nice macros, I can imagine better shots without wind and with some exposure correction EV -0.5 or EV -1 you will get more sharpness and contrast...THX I will doubt more mates will join and show off their own photos...I will appreciate some sceneries and middle range photos in good light conditions...
I'll get some done later.
I'll post a few for you shortly. Stay tuned
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Here are my shots from the weekend.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Swyped from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
THX for your contribution, but they are TOO small for discovering quality of photos could you please upload at least zip file with originals??? That would by really great...
The outside pics are odd, my phone seems to have flipped them, lol
Apologies for my $2 dinner.
I quickly snapped some around the house earlier. I'm still getting to grips with the best way to get good photos with this camera, but I'm extremely impressed with it. Best Android camera I've used.
Photos are here: https://picasaweb.google.com/danwoolstencroft/SamsungGalaxyS2Samples#
I've uploaded the full res images.
Sticks02 said:
The outside pics are odd, my phone seems to have flipped them, lol
Apologies for my $2 dinner.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please refrain from posting pictures of food and naked ladies.
very nice photos...it seems that SGS II camera is very good in focusing for near and middle distances (up to 5-8m). Macro is nice oo...maybe far distances wont be so nice and sharp but still great result in good light conditions...
PS: Beautiful dogs, I have black one at home...
kultus said:
PS: Beautiful dogs, I have black one at home...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Yeah, the longer range stuff does seem to lack a little sharpness at the moment. I don't know if I can overcome that with the settings or not. Macro and reasonably close range stuff is excellent, and it's taking some brilliant pictures of my kids.
I haven't done a vast amount of low light stuff yet either.
Also quite importantly, it's quick. I've found that compared to the iPhone, a lot of smartphone cameras take a while to actually get the shot, or to load up so you can start using them. SGS2 does neither, it's quick to load in, and the shots are pretty much instant in the right mode.
I'll try and get a sports mode example too, that's quite a fun toy to play with. It'll track a moving target in a panorama mode.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/864/20110510151306.jpg/
a pic of my camera
nice shot, hope to see more low light performance ;-)
Daytime pix are great but pix at night with flash give off this yellow tinge
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
StickyGeko said:
Daytime pix are great but pix at night with flash give off this yellow tinge
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Notice the yellowish on right side of photo, it seem like many of the user of sgs2 having this problem on led flash, and it all occur at the right handside of photo
this made me remember on the n86 led flash ---> yellowish led light. May I know sgs2 flash light color is white or yellowish?
I was messing around with the macro on one of the grass shots but I didn't tap focus for any of the pics, just point and click. For the first two I think they look like that because I was pointing the lens in the direction of the sun to see how they would come out.
macro mode
how do you set the camera to macro mode, on the xperia x10 it was in the settings with a tulip icon but can't find it on the sgs2? any help would be appreciated.
THX for your contribution, but they are TOO small for discovering quality of photos could you please upload at least zip file with originals??? That would by really great...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using xda app to view this? Or pc? I'm uploading the photos straight from gallery via xda app.
Swyped from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
silentbob59 said:
how do you set the camera to macro mode, on the xperia x10 it was in the settings with a tulip icon but can't find it on the sgs2? any help would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera > Settings > Focus Mode > Macro.
I've been playing around with the camera today and got a few interesting results. So I've created this thread so that we can post and share our pictures and settings used to achieve them. I feel this would be good for people who perhaps are not familiar with our cameras settings and would like to get better shots.
I think our SGS2s camera can achieve some fantastic results
Please post your favourite shot and the settings you used below
Here is mine to start off.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Settings:
-White Balance; Sunlight.
-Metering; Matrix
-ISO auto or 100 (I think, forgot)
holy CRAP that's nice... i'll try to take some later =D
What resolution is that? the Max setting also?
My first macro shot with the SGSII, results were better than expected!
I believe everything was pretty much set to auto, except focus.
I should have some more lying around.
Nice shot
Whenever I point the phone to my dog, he thinks it's something like a gun so he runs away.
Can you tell me what's diffirent between metering : spot, matrix...?
Here in Spain it's ice-cream time
I always shoot in min ISO, so ISO 100. Both in macro mode.
Another macro shot (also ISO 100):
wow! amazing shots!!! very sharp and nice DOF
OMG wow.... Ok i will post some soon.
trungdaika said:
Can you tell me what's diffirent between metering : spot, matrix...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is centre-weighted, Spot and matrix metering.
These options take readings from the image which adjusts exposure to the image being produced according to the light intensities.
Centre- weighed towards the centre and averaged throughout the rest of the scene
Spot- the camera will only measure a very small area of the centre spot, useful when there is a relatively small object within your scene which you need to be perfectly exposed.
Matrix - takes reading from split areas of the scene to calculate the best exposure and sets it according to an average.
...I think
It's all a bit complicated to be honest, well for me it is, I'm just a beginner.
computermilk said:
holy CRAP that's nice... i'll try to take some later =D
What resolution is that? the Max setting also?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Highest res and Image quality, 3264x2448 (8MP)
A few more of mine:
This more of a spur of the moment shot, I just wanted to test how it would look!
And finally one to test how good the flash would be in pitch black:
PyroCF said:
A few more of mine:
This more of a spur of the moment shot, I just wanted to test how it would look!
And finally one to test how good the flash would be in pitch black:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
give that angry bird toy to me or i will kill u. the results of the flash seems excellent. thanks a lot buddy
dave2 said:
Matrix - takes reading from split areas of the scene to calculate the best exposure and sets it according to an average.
...I think
It's all a bit complicated to be honest, well for me it is, I'm just a beginner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
matrix mode does not take "split areas" (it might just be a language issue however), it splits the images into a matrix (a table if you prefer) and finds out the best exposure for each point in the matrix.
this usually fixes up expose problems and while i didnt test the matrix implementation of the sgs2 im surprised it doesn't default to it, in theory, it should make all those overexposed pics ppl take on smartphones look "mostly" fine
centered will not, and you always notice it when the lighting is not correct, with the burned out / over exposed edges
Lots of nice cars.
Centre weighted, ISO 40. Really happy with the camera.
Im interested in this thing: lock exposure after focusing. e.g. SE X10 and other sony ericssons are capable to lock exposure after phone camera focus on object. Then you can move phone to other position and fullpress to take picture...this is very good when dificult light conditions...THX for answer
bilboa1 said:
matrix mode does not take "split areas" (it might just be a language issue however), it splits the images into a matrix (a table if you prefer) and finds out the best exposure for each point in the matrix.
this usually fixes up expose problems and while i didnt test the matrix implementation of the sgs2 im surprised it doesn't default to it, in theory, it should make all those overexposed pics ppl take on smartphones look "mostly" fine
centered will not, and you always notice it when the lighting is not correct, with the burned out / over exposed edges
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for clearing that up
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
rob_h said:
Lots of nice cars.
Centre weighted, ISO 40. Really happy with the camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iso 40?? how can you choose 40? iso 100 is the lowest on mine
Just in case others haven't noticed, there is a Camera firmware update available. Don't ask me where I found it but it was in the "Samsung Apps" app somewhere! I have no idea what it improves either (if anything).
Mine
I've been to Amsterdam lately ..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Extremely amazing .. no need to buy a cam
We have a phone that now works
So its time to show off those photos with our sexy omnivision sensor
and yes the photos look better than something taken on a fisher's price camera
Without further ado...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
What about your pics? Do you use the DVP to take pics?
Chicago, Eh? I will be over in that city soon...
My pictures aren't as good as domineus's, I have a shaky hand when holding the dvp camera (usually take pictures with a DSLR)
EDIT: I forgot, I took these pictures while traveling in England.
Soon (tm)
Haven't updated to mango yet, waiting on that at&t firmware so i dont have to spend a night reverting/re-updating. Can't wait to take non-****ty pics.
That's some nice shots for a smartphone.
notebookgrail said:
That's some nice shots for a smartphone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
omnivision lense is actually good on the dvp now
the new options actually mean something to me now!
domineus said:
omnivision lense is actually good on the dvp now
the new options actually mean something to me now!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What settings are you using, are they making a difference?
efjay said:
What settings are you using, are they making a difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
depends on conditions
lower lighting I use iso of 4 or 8 depends though
surprisingly indoors, I just use tungsten or fluorescent
thats one huge reason why i liked in previous os versions you couldn't save settings. Ideally, because the shot changes, I would want a new set of settings (as long as it was default to 5 mp I'm a happy camper, samsung focus users on the other hand begged for the camera saving settings)
The camera is surprisingly more usable now, and really shines in outdoor photos. I'll try your iso settings when I'm inside.
One thing I hate, with all of my heart, is the white striping over the flash. It's printed on the plastic that is attached to the battery cover. It ruins pictures that use the flash, especially when the subject is medium-close. You just see these really ugly yellow-white bars over the image. It's a real dealbreaker so I try not to use the flash at all.
I've been planning my attack to remove it without removing the entire plastic piece. The stripes feel slightly raised, but i'm sure it can be sanded down and cleaned with a light solvent. Anyone got any ideas?
What's the use of the white stripe? Does it disperse the flash evenly to prevent harsh tones?
Not sure of its intended purpose. Plenty of other phones just have the LED under a clear plastic cover and they take pictures just fine. It's almost as if it was put there to intentionally ruin shots with the flash!
its supposed to act as a light "defuser" (sp), but it sucks.
Arc, if you manage to remove it, post a how to please.
venelar said:
its supposed to act as a light "defuser" (sp), but it sucks.
Arc, if you manage to remove it, post a how to please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is a light defuser but it sucks I do admit
more pics - dvp does have a good camera
on my way to the gym today i took a bunch of pix with the dvp... about 70% were crap. green, blurry, to dark... this was all outside in blasting 90+ sun i also took a few shots in the very brightly lit gym.. but it was a blur-fest.
here are some non-crap ones.
(i'm running mango beta 2 and 212)
I think the best feature relevant to the DVP camera is "tap to snap" -- being able to tap on the screen to take the photo instead of pressing that infernal camera button has led to less blurry shots for me.
hrmm.. never tried the tab-to-hopefully-not-blur
i'll try that tomorrow.
oh sea-ray! hurry the hell up!
tai4de2 said:
I think the best feature relevant to the DVP camera is "tap to snap" -- being able to tap on the screen to take the photo instead of pressing that infernal camera button has led to less blurry shots for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is "tap to snap" a Mango feature?
tap to snap pix, for me, are as good (bad) as using the button... oh well
then its probably how the camera is being held
steady hand on any camera, not just the dvp
also while the dvp takes good shots, you also should try some sort of editing too if needed. Autofix is a powerful thing
In darker lighting increase iso gain and play with the settings till you get a proper image. Also the nokia camera lense from the n8 is unbelievable
I wish Dell would add an anti-shaking setting to the camera like the Samsung Focus. When this setting defaulted to on in the Focus NoDO release, picture quality went way up. This, plus some better color correction, would make the DVP camera acceptable.
Sent from my Venue Pro using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
mskovrinskie said:
I wish Dell would add an anti-shaking setting to the camera like the Samsung Focus. When this setting defaulted to on in the Focus NoDO release, picture quality went way up. This, plus some better color correction, would make the DVP camera acceptable.
Sent from my Venue Pro using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its h/w
dell can't add it
Just found out how to make good low light pictures with some changes in camera settings.
The settings are :
Manual mode
change the EV to +1.0
flash on
HDR off
Here are 2 pictures to show the differences:
Superior auto:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Settings above:
-This settings are exceptional when you shoot near objects,like people,pictures in the room..
-Try it yourself and report.
-Thank me if you find this thread helpful.
C6603 ?
Night scene does a decent job taking low light pictures. Better than superior auto.
If you reduce the resolution for some reason helps make better low light pics.
DrKrFfXx said:
Night scene does a decent job taking low light pictures. Better than superior auto.
If you reduce the resolution for some reason helps make better low light pics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not better than my settings, try it yourself.
Night scene:
C6603 ?
I can't seem to find "Contrast" settings?
Do you mean Exposure Value (EV)?
Sorry for that,yes it's EV.
I will fix that in the post
C6603 ?
Look stop asking for a perfect photo in complete darknes. Yes Lumias illuminate a room in an bizzare way, but that is so artifitial. The point of LOW LIGHT is that when there IS SOME LIGHT the phone captures SOME MORE DETAIL. It's not meant to be a night vision feature. LOW LIGHT - even in the name it indicates that there has to be some light.
And with the recent updates it takes relly good lowlights in superior auto.
Sidd_9 said:
Look stop asking for a perfect photo in complete darknes. Yes Lumias illuminate a room in an bizzare way, but that is so artifitial. The point of LOW LIGHT is that when there IS SOME LIGHT the phone captures SOME MORE DETAIL. It's not meant to be a night vision feature. LOW LIGHT - even in the name it indicates that there has to be some light.
And with the recent updates it takes relly good lowlights in superior auto.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody's asking for a perfect photo. He's just sharing what what he found that is taking good photos in low light.
Sent from my C6603
@Sidd_9 Okey,but the 'Low light' is bad at superior mode,and night scene is nothing better.
C6603 ?
it really depends on what you classify as a "better" low light photo.
OPs photo is one that is lit up brightly with the flash, and looks like you have the light in the room turned on.
But others may want a photo which shows the ambience of the scene in low light, and have a more evenly exposed photo albeit it being a bit darker overall.
End of the day, depends on what you are trying to capture in your photo.
If you can hold it still, use fireworks mode:
electric0ant said:
it really depends on what you classify as a "better" low light photo.
OPs photo is one that is lit up brightly with the flash, and looks like you have the light in the room turned on.
But others may want a photo which shows the ambience of the scene in low light, and have a more evenly exposed photo albeit it being a bit darker overall.
End of the day, depends on what you are trying to capture in your photo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u want to make a photo for examp. to your friends. They will be dark and hard to see with superior mode.
I just hate that. It's more detailed and more light with this manual settings like with an S4 or HTC One.
C6603 ?
DoubleYouPee said:
If you can hold it still, use fireworks mode:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You think I didn't tried it?
C6603 ?
svaka cas majstore
sent from moa G-Nex7
How bout shooting friends at night? Any sample +settings?
-sent from that phone below
you may limit the ISO, to 400 or 800 with EV+1
Noise will greatly reduced, but you must hold steady too...
boyq said:
How bout shooting friends at night? Any sample +settings?
-sent from that phone below
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A gun with a laser sight
Thanks to the OP I tried this with my ZR and it works a treat.
Sent from my C5503 using xda app-developers app
Starlith said:
Thanks to the OP I tried this with my ZR and it works a treat.
Sent from my C5503 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np
Tried something else,the pictures are better at night with superior mode when you shoot landscapes.
So, this settings are only for near objects,like people,pictures in the room..
C6603 ?
beni8978 said:
Np
Tried something else,the pictures are better at night with superior mode when you shoot landscapes.
So, this settings are only for near objects,like people,pictures in the room..
C6603 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Night portrait and night works good too for me.
Sent from my C6603
For landscapes, yes
C6603 ?