Related
I know this is developement section and i should not post like this but i want to tell that whenever i open this developement section i see some new froyo custom roms or rom upgrades with several new features , nothing more. I think it is enough creating roms like v1.0 then v1.1 then v1.2 then v1.3 and so on. Galaxy 5 uses enjoying cyanogen but we can't. All devs are in the race for providing better froyo roms but no on one wants to provide cyanogen, why? because it is not possible. If port of cyanogen is possible in g5 then not in g3. G3 is better phone then G5. Shall we have to satisfied only with froyo roms? All devs are giving their best but it is enough creating new version of froyo in every week, do something new, port CYANOGEN which we really wants.I don't know anything about programming, coding, i can't do anything but all u devs are able to port cyanogen to our device. So please stop doing like v1.0=>v1.1=>v1.2=>v1.3 and do Cyanogen.All devs please combilne at one place and give us CYANOGEN.
Cyanogen can be ported to our phone. I have no idea how can i do this, i may give it a try in summer but i will fail, it is sure. But i will start to learn coding, & kernel compiling (the basics).
Maybe a few of the devs come together, make a team and then work on this
m ready to learn and try
you are right but seriously its not EASY! you should have very good programming skills... and why is CM so good anyway? i would prefer MIUI port. when you say cyanogen mod i assume you mean the latest GB version? what is so great in GB anyway? i mean yeah its newer than froyo but still, i have my own tablet and it runs 2.3 (3.0 is coming ) and i dont think its that great... i like the edge glow and on/off animation but thats it. we CAN have the same features on froyo! and besides IF we would port GB it would take so much time that android 2.5 would be out already and then everybody would say that GB sucks... thats all
It's a lot lot of work to do it.
marcellusbe said:
It's a lot lot of work to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, like u modify kernel with coding, cant we modify the ROM from the source files??not for cyanogen but to improve froyo better??
dharammaniar said:
Hey, like u modify kernel with coding, cant we modify the ROM from the source files??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, you must start from source files as you must compile all. No ?
In example, for gingerbread, I started compiling it from google source, but I'm stuck with libaudio library.
I took libaudio source code from sgs and I will see if I can compile them and continue.
In addition, you should adapt kernel 2.6.35 for the apollo device, and that's a big work too.
Or if we are lucky, kernel 2.6.32 could work ... I don't know.
I know it is not easy but please devs do something. If porting once started we will defenetily get Cyanogen.
The thing is cyanogen takes alot of time and there's no encouragement so I say whoever devs GB then I will donate £10 to them and I know many others will.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
The best thing wat I feel is stopping any further froyo roms n start porting cm/miui/gb same as v0.1 > v0.2 releasing small mods I think everyone here will help testing them....i dont mind even my phone explodes...i have no idea how u techie guys do all this things all I know is flash watever u guys release n test it so we can make a better g3...
dilzo said:
The thing is cyanogen takes alot of time and there's no encouragement so I say whoever devs GB then I will donate £10 to them and I know many others will.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think if you want it in a raisonable delay, then it's more than a full time job for only 1 person ....
deadwood01 said:
The best thing wat I feel is stopping any further froyo roms n start porting cm/miui/gb same as v0.1 > v0.2 releasing small mods I think everyone here will help testing them....i dont mind even my phone explodes...i have no idea how u techie guys do all this things all I know is flash watever u guys release n test it so we can make a better g3...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before you must have a basic framework working and only that it's really a big work to do.
can't u guys make the screen on/off animation on froyo, that would be really cool
werker123 said:
can't u guys make the screen on/off animation on froyo, that would be really cool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well do that as soon as the guy who already did that will release his mod
We shall ask motafoca for help, he does not have a sg3 but has a lot of knowledge and experience porting Gingerbread to sg5!
Once we have some clue or knowledge on how to start with we then can try/experiment ways to accomplish CyanogenMod.
Some proof for Sg5 having 2.3>here
As for people who want to port GB or Cyanogen flores said in this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13132913&postcount=51 that he has already done work on gingerbread so i guess devs like apollo or other people who have experience in the kernel front can have something to work upon....... what i mean is there are a few devs who have mentioned about their incomplete works on Cyanogen/gingerbread, if an experienced developer can combine all their individual work we can have something actually working........
anant.0097 said:
As for people who want to port GB or Cyanogen flores said in this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13132913&postcount=51 that he has already done work on gingerbread so i guess devs like apollo or other people who have experience in the kernel front can have something to work upon....... what i mean is there are a few devs who have mentioned about their incomplete works on Cyanogen/gingerbread, if an experienced developer can combine all their individual work we can have something actually working........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok first of all dont take flores too seriously... he just talks too much and never does anything so i doupt that he has done anything more than looked at GB and said he can port it... i have asked about his project and quess what? nothing.
True is that we have too many custom roms, but changes only name and theme. We can customize everything in froyo rom, but we need to have some1 who can customize kernel! We have one kernel by our hero marcel and thats all! His kernel is used by every rom here. Always same:
New custom rom!
Same features as another rom
Thanks to marcellube for his kernel
We dont need gb, we dont need cm7
But
We need MORE KERNELS!!!
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
question for all! how can you ask for cyanogen if you wont help anyone? i have asked for people who know java (i know there are people who knows java) but nobody hasnt commented on my thread we could do it but nobody wants to help... all we need is some guys who knows java programming... so is there ANYONE? if there is contact me on this thread or my other thread in general section....
peldax said:
True is that we have too many custom roms, but changes only name and theme. We can customize everything in froyo rom, but we need to have some1 who can customize kernel! We have one kernel by our hero marcel and thats all! His kernel is used by every rom here. Always same:
New custom rom!
Same features as another rom
Thanks to marcellube for his kernel
We dont need gb, we dont need cm7
But
We need MORE KERNELS!!!
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i totally agree! more kernels with different features like on sgs forums... we have already lost one great kernel developer gsam101 who developed the first custom and best kernels for us
Hi all,
I am so excited now, can't wait to tell all you guys that news
Maybe someone know that I have upgraded our kernel to the newest kernel tree from nvidia's git and waiting for it to be stable for daily use. However, I found it can't boot in the newest ACER's stock ROM yesterday. After one full day hack, it finally can boot in the stock ROM now.
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Thanks
I can test the stability, but not the HDMI output.
P.S : Nice to see you here roggin
I can test hdmi, only 720p, but at least I can verify that.
roggin said:
Hi all,
I am so excited now, can't wait to tell all you guys that news
Maybe someone know that I have upgraded our kernel to the newest kernel tree from nvidia's git and waiting for it to be stable for daily use. However, I found it can't boot in the newest ACER's stock ROM yesterday. After one full day hack, it finally can boot in the stock ROM now.
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Johnny0906 said:
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nvidia's kernel is the ORIGINAL kernel, all others base their continued work on, so Acer use these updates as reference..
Can you check up on the bluetooth issue on this kernel you make..
I know tiamat/xoom kernel is really close to stock nvidia kernel too (or fully supported with drivers). so maybe something dirty needs changing..
havent had chance to fix..
problem for now, seems to be it can scan, but seems to timeout on transmitting, so it suddenly cannot see new units after some minutes. maybe worth doublechecking.
vache said:
I can test the stability, but not the HDMI output.
P.S : Nice to see you here roggin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi vache,
Coooool, it's so nice to see you here
I have pm you the link, please take it a try
Thanks for your help again
Johnny0906 said:
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, I haven't added OC code in it, but I will add it when it stable enough
Thanks
Dexter_nlb said:
Can you check up on the bluetooth issue on this kernel you make..
I know tiamat/xoom kernel is really close to stock nvidia kernel too (or fully supported with drivers). so maybe something dirty needs changing..
havent had chance to fix..
problem for now, seems to be it can scan, but seems to timeout on transmitting, so it suddenly cannot see new units after some minutes. maybe worth doublechecking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Dexter_nlb:
I have tested the bluetooth function in this kernel, it works fine in my kernel
If you are interested in it, I can mail or share a link of my kernel source for you
Thanks
roggin said:
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Roggin,
I play with versions and can test HDMI 1080P with Taboonay 0.9.1. Please send me the link to kernel. Do you make also modules, especialy for 3G?
roggin said:
Hi Dexter_nlb:
I have tested the bluetooth function in this kernel, it works fine in my kernel
If you are interested in it, I can mail or share a link of my kernel source for you
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please do i would love to play around with it "internally" and testing...
im little occupied atm, so hdmi can be tested, and regular use for now..
I can probably make you the oc add-ons and see how it turns out with your work and send you my diff back.. (don't know git commit)
I would be willing to due some stability testing with the acer stock rom.
Let me know.
Dexter_nlb said:
please do i would love to play around with it "internally" and testing...
im little occupied atm, so hdmi can be tested, and regular use for now..
I can probably make you the oc add-ons and see how it turns out with your work and send you my diff back.. (don't know git commit)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Dexter_nlb,
It's a big big help that you can help me ,
I am not releasing kernel source is because I don't want to brick someone's tablet, but It's ok for power developer like you.
I am uploading the kernel, I will info you when uploading done
Thanks for your help
snickle said:
I would be willing to due some stability testing with the acer stock rom.
Let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi snickle,
I think it's fine using Taboonay's ramdisk in stock rom, but not sure
If you can help me for test, I will pm the link for you
Thanks
roggin said:
I am not releasing kernel source is because I don't want to brick someone's tablet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they know how to compile it, then I guess they can enjoy their brick
Just be careful not releasing the source code, as it is under a open licence. I'm pretty sure that's why thor2002ro's kernel thread was deleted by moderators off fo this forum. I don't want to see another Kernel development go south because it wasn't public .
roggin said:
Hi snickle,
I think it's fine using Taboonay's ramdisk in stock rom, but not sure
If you can help me for test, I will pm the link for you
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the usage of ramdisk should be optional, because it might not allow to encrypt your device, and as you hopefully know, encryption is necessary to allow exchange activesync connection for email push, except if somebody finds out a what has to be modified to use activesync without encryption.
I also join ShadowXVII concerning the kernel source, if somebody wants to brick his device, it's up to him, but be carefull not to get removed because you did not publish the source.
otherwise well done my friend.
zoubidou said:
I also join ShadowXVII concerning the kernel source, if somebody wants to brick his device, it's up to him, but be carefull not to get removed because you did not publish the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You only have to publicly release the source if you publicly release the binary - he's only obliged to give the source to the people he gave the binary to. So there's no problems
On that note: I've just flashed Taboonay and am happy to give your kernel a try. I don't have a dev environment set up these days, but if you can send me the boot.img I'll take a crack at it.
themono said:
You only have to publicly release the source if you publicly release the binary - he's only obliged to give the source to the people he gave the binary to. So there's no problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, thanks for the clarification. Just being cautious as I'd prefer Kernel development wasn't hindered at all. That being said, a public source may promote development as opposed to ending up with several different kernels by different developers. I'm all for collaboration, and it's great to see some within this thread
On a side note, any Kernel developers that may be able to shed some light onto this thread would be appreciated -- in particular, the kernel requirements for networking over USB; http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15452414#post15452414
Hi all,
It's not I don't want to release it. It's almost 300+ patches between older and newer version, and include some regulator voltage patch. I want to sure not damage any part in all functions.
Give me one more days, when I collect all necessary response from tester, I will release it
Thanks
I did exactly the same on the tiamat kernel, waited and hoped to had time debugging the bluetooth issue, but got modarator complaints on not publicing any source
anyways, as long as no binary appear in this thread, i think you're safe from any mods attacking you on GPL issues (or do like thor200ro move it offsite, if you feel like breaking GPL)
Talk is just talk for now, no mods can argue against that for now..
as you all probably know paul-xxx released an ICS rom for our X8 which is apparently based on CM9 (correct me if i am wrong). however it has a lot of problems like WiFi, Camera etc. it also has kernel compatibility issues like gsm working on nAa kernel but not on alfs kernel and so on (again correct me if i am wrong). so i have decided that i will set about the task of building a compatible kernel for this rom. however that is not possible alone by me. i need the help of expert devs on X8. so let's start, shall we?
i can only can help you in testing , sorry im not an expert, i hope some people help you to compile the kernel !!!!
sorry my bad english !!
as i say any help is greatly appreciated. and could you ask other devs you know to help me out? thanks in advance.
I know that FXP is already doing something for MSM7227 for ICS
It is in their Git, maybe they are planing to port ICS to X10Mini/X10MiniPro/X8, or help on that.
I cant help because I am using W8 and I cannot unlock bootloader. I am sorry but I will help support you guys...
Hit the THANKS button if I helped!!
Sent from my W8 using Tapatalk
RockitOut11 said:
I know that FXP is already doing something for MSM7227 for ICS
It is in their Git, maybe they are planing to port ICS to X10Mini/X10MiniPro/X8, or help on that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u sure about that?
whats the part of "maybe" that you didn't understand?
when i say "maybe", maybe i'm not sure! (funny? no?)
---------- Post added at 01:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:48 PM ----------
https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x27-ics
What i was talking about
so you want to make kernel with thi sources?
https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x27-ics
I thought about this myself too but don t have linux on my computer and i would install it but that partitioning... naaah
good luck
EDIT: i didnt refresh the site
RockitOut11 said:
whats the part of "maybe" that you didn't understand?
when i say "maybe", maybe i'm not sure! (funny? no?)
---------- Post added at 01:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:48 PM ----------
https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x27-ics
What i was talking about
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
perhaps you didnt understand the purpose of my thread. i wanted to create a kernel for paul's ICS. and anyways thanks.
yeah, i know, but i preffer to wait to see if FXP does something
@Xmaster8 But if you want i can compile that FXP kernel for you. I have DualBoot, Ubuntu 10.10 and Windows7
RockitOut11 said:
yeah, i know, but i preffer to wait to see if FXP does something
@Xmaster8 But if you want i can compile that FXP kernel for you. I have DualBoot, Ubuntu 10.10 and Windows7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have a question. in fact 2 questions.
1. can i use this guide to compile a kernel using this source except for the fact that the source will be different (in this case the ICS kernel source that you referred me to)?
2. since FXP kernel has compatibility issues with some roms, will a kernel using their ICS source be compatible with paul's ICS?
hope to see reply soon.
souljaboy11792 said:
i have a question. in fact 2 questions.
1. can i use this guide to compile a kernel using this source except for the fact that the source will be different (in this case the ICS kernel source that you referred me to)?
2. since FXP kernel has compatibility issues with some roms, will a kernel using their ICS source be compatible with paul's ICS?
hope to see reply soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. yes
2. maybe, maybe not it all about experiments
is the FXP ICS source complete?
souljaboy and can i ask u something? whats yours skills about these things? are u programmer? thx
/so nothing will be
souljaboy11792 said:
is the FXP ICS source complete?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes they are complete, but maybe not "ICS" at all, i think so
hardly any skill though it doesnt hurt to develop some..lol
RockitOut11 said:
yes they are complete, but maybe not "ICS" at all, i think so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what makes you think so?
msm7x27:initial fork [freexperia]
i think this means that they forked the "base" kernel for Msm7x27, so it must be complete.
@souljaboy11792 If you botherd to look at FXP ICS source you will see it's only for es209ra (X10).You can't build this for X8 witout a lot of changes.And what's the point of this thread when you know nothing about kernel building.(Don't mean to be rude)
alfsamsung said:
@souljaboy11792 If you botherd to look at FXP ICS source you will see it's only for es209ra (X10).You can't build this for X8 witout a lot of changes.And what's the point of this thread when you know nothing about kernel building.(Don't mean to be rude)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice to see you alfsamsung,well he needs your expertise cause you know everything in kernel building
Hi there,
I'm trying to build some froyo rom for g1 from source. The problem is that lot of stuff lying here is old, unusable slow or hopelessly broken. The only rom that seems to work is hxxp://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
[Rom][2.2.3 AOSP] DREAMteam Froyo v2.0.0 [9/3/2012]
The kernel source can be easy found by Ezterry
hxxps://github.com/ezterry/kernel-biff-testing/tree/ezgb-2636-v1.5.2-20111106
but I can't find any (git) repo or hint how the "DREAMteam" guys built it. :crying:
Thanks in advance for any hints,
ptau
pm the devs
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
All you need for building the kernel is here at this url:
https://github.com/ezterry/manifest-gingerbread-DS/blob/gingerbread/README.mkdn
It used to be on the ezgingerbread rom thread but seems he has a link to the guide which is now on github ^_^
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
xillius200 said:
All you need for building the kernel is here at this url:
https://github.com/ezterry/manifest-gingerbread-DS/blob/gingerbread/README.mkdn
It used to be on the ezgingerbread rom thread but seems he has a link to the guide which is now on github ^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Building the kernel for froyo or building the ezgingerbread rom is no problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=882356
Unfortunately (Ez)gingerbread is an overkill for the tiny G1
My problem is to find out how to build a froyo rom that is not
broken (e.g. cm6). The DREAMteam's
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
rom seems to have the most bugs fixed, but again I don't know
how to build it. I need the right android manifest, git repo, etc.
The DREAMteam changelog is astonishingly sparse:
V2.0.0 - 2012-03-09
Update to android 2.2.3. Some changes from 1.9.2 included.
Thanks ptau
ptau said:
Building the kernel for froyo or building the ezgingerbread rom is no problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=882356
Unfortunately (Ez)gingerbread is an overkill for the tiny G1
My problem is to find out how to build a froyo rom that is not
broken (e.g. cm6). The DREAMteam's
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
rom seems to have the most bugs fixed, but again I don't know
how to build it. I need the right android manifest, git repo, etc.
The DREAMteam changelog is astonishingly sparse:
V2.0.0 - 2012-03-09
Update to android 2.2.3. Some changes from 1.9.2 included.
Thanks ptau
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I got in touch with tval aint spoke to him for a while. He said a repo was never made for DREAMteam froyo and the way in which it was created some by pushing files not everything was coding, there was not much point in a repo and he has not got around to it lol and I totally agree with him. So best thing would be to compile a rom from plain AOSP and begin to modify it yourself, this way you learn and better understand rom creation. Plus doing it straight from AOSP will give you the updates you want and in most ways will actually be better ^^ If you want any help I could always introduce you to a few devs see if they would be willing to help ^^
PS: From how you worded your first post it sounded like you were trying to compile just the ezterry kernel xD so I apologise that I misunderstood ^^
99%
xillius200 said:
As far as I remember when it was first started they never had a repository and unless it has changed they still do not lol ill email tvall later lol seems Ldrifta is gone.... :'( if not you can always just compile a normal aosp and then customize it to your liking and speed helps you learn on how to speed up roms that way unlike having an already fast rom of which you learn less from.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. After I looked in the zip, I thought something like that.
Seriously, you don't need speed with this hardware.
Think of cheap, stable, not battery eating
and hackable ARM11 development platform
After that incident with kernel.org they removed all the old android repos
so I have hard times to find the G1 pieces again. ezterry rocks. The kernel
changes are in his git, I could tweak+build the kernel with all the
modules I needed.
Let's see how to get the aosp together ...
(any hints greatly appreciated
PS: From how you worded your first post it sounded like you were trying to compile just the ezterry kernel xD so I apologise that I misunderstood ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but my German is much better, I swear :angel:
Well.. I'd be happy to help rebuild my rom. Been wanting to set up a repo, but I'm lazy..
tvall said:
Well.. I'd be happy to help rebuild my rom. Been wanting to set up a repo, but I'm lazy..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the email with tips.
I try to document the building process here:
hxxps://sites.google.com/site/aospdream/
As always, any hints or help from anybody are greatly appreciated ...
Thanks,
ptau
Hi guys i need you to test the performance of this kernel i've made
ONLY DECEMBER CM12.1 NIGHTLIES COMPATIBLE
LINK
Please tell me how your Phone performs,if better or worse.
NOTE : I don't know if this is the right section as i'm not sure if this is actually "worth" putting in development section.(waiting for user evalutation)
I try
I can try your kernel but, it can boot??
And you dont have an moto e???
hetor99 said:
I can try your kernel but, it can boot??
And you dont have an moto e???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it boots.
I Have tested on mine and it's blazing fast.I Just wanted make sure it's the kernel and not the mods that i applied to the ROM ^^
The perform with your kernel is the same has cm 12.1 stock kernel and when i install your kernel my wifi dont work im using moke open source rom up to date with the cyanogenmod sources and you can add some cpu governors, faux sound control, simple gpu algorithm.
Cheez2553 said:
Hi guys i need you to test the performance of this kernel i've made
ONLY DECEMBER CM12.1 NIGHTLIES COMPATIBLE
LINK
Please tell me how your Phone performs,if better or worse.
NOTE : I don't know if this is the right section as i'm not sure if this is actually "worth" putting in development section.(waiting for user evalutation)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is a kernel, then dont create a normal thread. Create a DevDB project for testing it. Or I will make a DevDB project and give you the credits.
PoseidonKing said:
If it is a kernel, then dont create a normal thread. Create a DevDB project for testing it. Or I will make a DevDB project and give you the credits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it doesn't "reserve" being a project because this is just an experiment i made with a toolchain,also i'm not going to add any feature to it anytime soon.
yes it's working fine and make things better.
Overall a decent kernel to try on.
-z3r0- said:
yes it's working fine and make things better.
Overall a decent kernel to try on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks i really appreciate your feedback.
hey man can you add a feature list or what tweaks it does.
That'll be awesome.
-z3r0- said:
hey man can you add a feature list or what tweaks it does.
That'll be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel posted here just features latest sabermod toolchain instead of Android Stock.
I'm going to work on this when i have time,i'll create a thread and provide you optimized CM and fast kernel..time is my enemy tho
Cheez2553 said:
The kernel posted here just features latest sabermod toolchain instead of Android Stock.
I'm going to work on this when i have time,i'll create a thread and provide you optimized CM and fast kernel..time is my enemy tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck with that and take your time bruh :good: