Database Users

[Q] Error when compiling Cyanogenmod 7

We have some additional problems.See the picture below:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I don't know where's the problem here.I put the kernel in the cm7/device/lg/swift directory but now there's this error.If you know something please tell us.

Please help
Please help us.If we solve all of the problems we will release the first build soon.

what error are you getting?

eoghan2t7 said:
what error are you getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you can see in the picture maybe some files are missing.I will take a look at openswift's source and try to fix this.

eoghan2t7 said:
what error are you getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get this errors when I type the code highlighted it the picture.

make sure no files have brokin during repo sync and that you have modded the source correctly

Edit the file / android_manifest/hardware/msm7k/Android.mk '
On the line: msm7k_adreno_dirs: = $ (common_msm_dirs) boot libgralloc-qsd8k libaudio
Remove "libgralloc-qsd8k libaudio".
I have already encountered this issue and many others when trying to build cyanogen. I have given up for a bit as its a real pain in the butt to get to build successfully.
I found some of the build issues and solutions on this page:
HTML:
http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://4pda.ws/forum/lofiversion/index.php%3Ft215440.html&ei=2ICoTYaMOMjDhAf9gvTQCQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFkQ7gEwBw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dgt540%2Balready%2Bdefined%2Bby%2Bmsm7k%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DnO8%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official%26channel%3Dnp%26prmd%3Divnsfd

This problem has been solved however we have additional problems which I will post later.

ephraim87 said:
Edit the file / android_manifest/hardware/msm7k/Android.mk '
On the line: msm7k_adreno_dirs: = $ (common_msm_dirs) boot libgralloc-qsd8k libaudio
Remove "libgralloc-qsd8k libaudio".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a wrong way. Just use a TARGET_PROVIDES_LIBAUDIO := true in your build configs. And you should try edit a CM sources as minimum as you can.
And I do not undrstand what makes sense to do it if it's already done?
Instead of this try to build a Codeaurora version, they can be a more fast and powersaving.

The topic has been updated.If you know something please post the answer below.
Thanks in advance.

Mur4ik said:
Its a wrong way. Just use a TARGET_PROVIDES_LIBAUDIO := true in your build configs. And you should try edit a CM sources as minimum as you can.
And I do not undrstand what makes sense to do it if it's already done?
Instead of this try to build a Codeaurora version, they can be a more fast and powersaving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change anything in the cm source.

Mur4ik said:
Its a wrong way. Just use a TARGET_PROVIDES_LIBAUDIO := true in your build configs. And you should try edit a CM sources as minimum as you can.
And I do not undrstand what makes sense to do it if it's already done?
Instead of this try to build a Codeaurora version, they can be a more fast and powersaving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the code aurora rom easier to build than cyanogenmod?

fdespotovski said:
Is the code aurora rom easier to build than cyanogenmod?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should I download the source?

Should I download the source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you can build ROMs without sources, then no, you should not download the sources
And if you did not know something about C or C++, and you can not write/change a drivers, then you waste your time now. Just building from source does not get you anithing.

Mur4ik said:
If you can build ROMs without sources, then no, you should not download the sources
And if you did not know something about C or C++, and you can not write/change a drivers, then you waste your time now. Just building from source does not get you anithing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We know Visual Basic, if that makes any difference.

Im glad you have some of the problems fixed fdespotovski. I was bored while doing my final year project for uni so I thought to have a go at building Android, turns out its a bit of a chore to do. Closest thing to c++ is java which I am on good turms with.
Although with java I can at least write some good apps for Android.

ephraim87 said:
Im glad you have some of the problems fixed fdespotovski. I was bored while doing my final year project for uni so I thought to have a go at building Android, turns out its a bit of a chore to do. Closest thing to c++ is java which I am on good turms with.
Although with java I can at least write some good apps for Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thaks for the post!We don't know any other programming languages than Visual Basic.Net and we are still learning it.We will try to fix the problems but if we don't succeed maybe we will give up.Building Android is a hard work when you don't know what you are doing.

Kernel for jw1

can semaphore jvz kernel be used for jw1 roms?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Yes, I just tried it and it works fine.

apparantly jw1 and jvz are almost identical (only diff is in lang files or something), so jvz kernel is fine.

i think that progress in changelog number is too great for the only changes to be were the language typos fixes
using custom kernel is bad
using custom kernel from previous version to some more recent is bad

but if you want various tweaks and overclocking there's no other possibility then using a custom kernel that supports it or am wrong?
greetz

well yes but take a second and think about it
kernel sources those guys use are half year old and are for 2.3.3 kernel version
currently used kernel by samsung in jw1 is 2.3.6 that sources are unreleased

$omator said:
well yes but take a second and think about it
kernel sources those guys use are half year old and are for 2.3.3 kernel version
currently used kernel by samsung in jw1 is 2.3.6 that sources are unreleased
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now i see. That's why i used to be so satisfied with my stock jvq rom and latest semaphore kernel. Now im on jvz and cant see any improvement. \/

i can tell that jw1 and jvx/jvz stock versions
are faster then jvt and eariler ones (2.3.5) - more responisive
tings like zergrush exploit gets patched
but it is still your fair choice to pick custom kernel
and overclock/ondervolt or do whatever you like with it
i am pissed a bit that those guys are not informing in op post
"builded from latest smsung source" is not saying that this source have half year
but i will not start another rant to get banned by some moderator for trollingas usuaal ;]

$omator said:
i think that progress in changelog number is too great for the only changes to be were the language typos fixes
using custom kernel is bad
using custom kernel from previous version to some more recent is bad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true. Were there any bugs that were not present in the stock kernel that is present in a custom kernel? None so far.
Samsung is obligated to release the latest source code for its kernel. If a compiled kernel doesn't boot or the kernel can't work with the binaries that are released, Samsung is liable to being sued for not being GPL compliant. So far they've been pretty quick in releasing sources (from the past year) with the delta being less than a 2 weeks after a release.
Also, if you spot any differences of stock with a custom kernel, you should report it to Samsung so that they release the latest source code. So far I have not detected any bugs stemming from using a compiled kernel from the source that's been released more than 3 months ago.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GB_Update2 you see is not even a full source - released in August

$omator said:
GB_Update2 you see is not even a full source - released in August
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is because Samsung expects you to use the pre-compiled modules for Wifi and a few others (from what I read from the source code).

still where is the latest source for jw1 or jvt ? any updated source i missed ?

$omator said:
still where is the latest source for jw1 or jvt ? any updated source i missed ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No changes for them. Even their initramfs didn't change except for the magic number for the pre-compiled modules.

no changes since august in sources ? are you serious mate ))))

$omator said:
no changes since august in sources ? are you serious mate ))))
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup
Decompile the initramfs and see for yourself
As for the kernel binaries themselves, it's harder to detect. However, no loss of functionality has been reported from custom kernel usage. I'm about 95% sure that no source change occurred.
Platform though, is another matter. The platform changed quite a bit, though all of it are closed sources ones (like Touchwiz).

;] 10 lulz!!

$omator said:
;] 10 lulz!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there is I didn't notice it. And gingerbread gpu drivers sucks.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

About gpl and Samsungs obligation to release sources for kernel:
JW1 is not released for public use, is it?
This is a LEAK and should be treated likewise - WYSIWYG
Tapatalked - There's a Thanks button somewhere

shush! they mixup 10 zImage's and it is working

$omator said:
i think that progress in changelog number is too great for the only changes to be were the language typos fixes
using custom kernel is bad
using custom kernel from previous version to some more recent is bad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I respect that you hate custom kernels but telling people that 'using custom kernel is bad'...is bad.
Can you please post your arguments?
With your logic XDA should not exist. With your logic nobody should tweak or change the standard products that Samsung delivers. Nobody should experiment. Nobody should try experimental features/tweaks/mods.
Or maybe, nobody except you?

[I9000] CNA 1.4.0 UNOFFICIAL nightly build [2/03][dead]

6/03 : Official topic has been opened
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23319217
Get your latest CNA fix there.
This topic is now officially (get it?) dead.
Since no official topic for CNA 1.4.0 has opened, I want to share their latest build.
It has the fixed RIL issues many are looking for.
I do not claim any involvement in the development of the ROM, I'm just a guy who setup a build environment, downloaded the source code and compiled.
As such : treat it as a NIGHTLY, this is NOT an official release so expect no support from me or the devs.
It's just a basic compile so be sure to know EXACTLY what you're doing before flashing.
Code:
ro.build.date=Tue Feb 21 18:26:48 CET 2012
ro.modversion=Codename-Android-(MOD)-1.4.0-GalaxyS
I can recommend flashing another kernel as the original had a tendency to bootloop in the past. But you don't need to listen to me of course.
21/2: http://www.mediafire.com/?rbbh36drchehigt
Edit: Apparently it also has the external SD card fix
26/2: I noticed several changes in their code: mostly kernel, bin, xbin. I compiled again. I'm running the default kernel for now.
http://www.mediafire.com/?81ciaepocyo6wp6
27/2: I've flashed another kernel as the included one caused a dialer wakelock, draining the battery, as well as two reboots.
2/03 : Uploaded another compile
http://www.mediafire.com/?lp54q6x6lkhzf3u
This could be the last one if I read the grapevine correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

you mean this is the "official" CNA from codenameandroid himself? :-D

You're a legend man. This rom is now perfect!
***Trusty old SGS1 running CNA ICS and Devil kernel 1.1BFS***

Is it DaxIΠFIΠITY ROM or someone else?

This has nothing to do with the Asnet release right? It was stopped because it contained a pay-app.
I want to try this one, but only if I harm nobody's income.
Benjamin

Same procedure as usual?
Which kernel is included here?
1) wipe cache & data/factory reset
2) flash zip
3) reboot phone and wipe again?
Im coming from GB 2.3.3.. cheers

BenjaminX2 said:
This has nothing to do with the Asnet release right? It was stopped because it contained a pay-app.
I want to try this one, but only if I harm nobody's income.
Benjamin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't have to worry, this is another release.

Mull1s said:
Same procedure as usual?
Which kernel is included here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, don't forget gapps.
Nandroid first !
As far as I know, the kernel is the standard CM9 one.
But you may want to try another ICS rom from in the development section first...

Data/factory reset is necessary in any case?

Wossner said:
Data/factory reset is necessary in any case?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's necessary if you don't come from an other CNA release...
BYTHAWAY Bubble, shouldn't you post this in development section? Or am I wrong?

boris0711 said:
BYTHAWAY Bubble, shouldn't you post this in development section? Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just compiled someone else's code, so it does not belong there.

How about External storage? Does it fix too?

Pekedel said:
How about External storage? Does it fix too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you need to be fixed ?
It is now visible in storage and the music player, is that what you mean ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I upgraded from Dax' release to this one without wipe and everything works fine.
RIL and external SD card issues have been solved.
The only thing that didn't work (didn't show up in the app list) was the Galaxy S Settings (AriesParts.apk), so I copied the one from Dax to /system/app and then it worked.

Is this rom have gb graphic leftovers?
Like orange stuffs,green buttons?

malcho said:
Is this rom have gb graphic leftovers?
Like orange stuffs,green buttons?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like any AOSP ICS, it has. But that can easily be remedied by this.

Bubble-be said:
Like any AOSP ICS, it has. But that can easily be remedied by this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks i will try it.

MrMagic said:
I upgraded from Dax' release to this one without wipe and everything works fine.
RIL and external SD card issues have been solved.
That's answer my question. Thanks. Now I can start flash your rom Bubble-be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Bubble-B
Thanks again for compiling this for us. Everything seems to work including Wi-Fi tethering solo!
Was wondering if you could use this commit to compile a deep idle top-OFF modded framework-Res.
https://github.com/peteralfonso/platform_vendor_pete/commit/a19d2a56ccf07b9ab53a44b7ba5605a1aaffd9e6
Unlike the other ICS ports this one seems to work glitch free. I was using this one on the previous 1.4 build with amazing success but it isn't compatible with this rom... Not 100% sure that commit is in this modded framework sorry.
http://db.tt/PMXOVx4K
***Trusty old SGS1 running CNA ICS and Devil kernel 1.1BFS***

rlorange said:
Bubble-be
Was wondering if you could use this commit to compile a deep idle top-OFF modded framework-Res.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I decided to indulge you as it's a friday night, so I edited that xml and ran the compile. Give it a shot, but you know it's mostly placebo right ?

Kernel Source About To Be Released !!

i Messaged Microsoft To Give me kernel Source and they kindly replied to me , And i think i'ts only a matter of time before we have kernel source to start modding .. and when i receive kernel source i'll upload it to public since i have no experience in modding and developing
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Good news..
What did they say...??
When will they give the kernel source..?
But even if we get the Kernel sources...there are no developers to work on X2..

iDuc said:
i Messaged Microsoft To Give me kernel Source and they kindly replied to me , And i think i'ts only a matter of time before we have kernel source to start modding .. and when i receive kernel source i'll upload it to public since i have no experience in modding and developing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask them to release it publicly and quote GPL as a reason.

x2wolf said:
Good news..
What did they say...??
When will they give the kernel source..?
But even if we get the Kernel sources...there are no developers to work on X2..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ashwin007 said:
Ask them to release it publicly and quote GPL as a reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've got this reply today
And i requested public release

iDuc said:
i've got this reply today
And i requested public release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats the reply..??

x2wolf said:
Whats the reply..??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they refused and will send it on cd
theres kernel source released tough on some link
https://github.com/juniskane/nokia_x2_rm-1013_2.0.0.11/releases

iDuc said:
they refused and will send it on cd
theres kernel source released tough on some link
https://github.com/juniskane/nokia_x2_rm-1013_2.0.0.11/releases
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u just download it an host it on Google drive.I'm unable to download from GitHub.
Sent from my Iron Box I

not latest?
Name "Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11" may be mean that Source Code of Nokia X2 firmware version 2.0.0.11, not latest version of Kernel Source Code (released this on 8 Aug 2014). Latest version of firmware 2.1.0.12. Did they forgot update Kernel Source Code to latest version?
Also, someone another components of firmware (not Kernel Source Code) may be have another (no GPL) free license of source code (some programs, drivers e.g.). We must request all source code.
P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
Also. Where we can check out this link (see up) - Is it really official link? Please, request Microsoft (Nokia) to publish this link on official Microsoft web site and update (if need) Kernel Source Code to latest version.

user_for_android said:
Name "Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11" may be mean that Source Code of Nokia X2 firmware version 2.0.0.11, not latest version of Kernel Source Code (released this on 8 Aug 2014). Latest version of firmware 2.1.0.12. Did they forgot update Kernel Source Code to latest version?
Also, someone another components of firmware (not Kernel Source Code) may be have another (no GPL) free license of source code (some programs, drivers e.g.). We must request all source code.
P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
Also. Where we can check out this link (see up) - Is it really official link? Please, request Microsoft (Nokia) to publish this link on official Microsoft web site and update (if need) Kernel Source Code to latest version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is not the cd they sent me it didnt arrived yet but i found this link

user_for_android said:
Name "Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11" may be mean that Source Code of Nokia X2 firmware version 2.0.0.11, not latest version of Kernel Source Code (released this on 8 Aug 2014). Latest version of firmware 2.1.0.12. Did they forgot update Kernel Source Code to latest version?
Also, someone another components of firmware (not Kernel Source Code) may be have another (no GPL) free license of source code (some programs, drivers e.g.). We must request all source code.
P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
Also. Where we can check out this link (see up) - Is it really official link? Please, request Microsoft (Nokia) to publish this link on official Microsoft web site and update (if need) Kernel Source Code to latest version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is not the cd they sent me it didnt arrived yet but i found this link

iDuc said:
this is not the cd they sent me it didnt arrived yet but i found this link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When CD comes?

Did you receive the Cd..???

I received CD. Unfortunately version of source code on CD is 2.0.0.11. I don't know 2.0.0.11 latest version of kernel or not.
Anyway, i reply "Please, send latest version GPL licensed (and another free licensed) code of Nokia X2 firmware to me."
sha512 sum from CD like in source code on link https://github.com/juniskane/nokia_x2_rm-1013_2.0.0.11/releases/tag/2.0.0.11
Photos:
1
2
3
4
5
6

Is it 2.0.0.11 or 2.1.0.11?
Latest one is 2.1.0.12 though there is not much difference in 2.1.0.11 & 2.1.0.12.
Can you upload the source code to some website like githhub and provide the link here?
Thanks,
Gautam.

Version 2.0.0.11. The source code is the same as here https://github.com/juniskane/nokia_x2_rm-1013_2.0.0.11/releases I check sha512 sum:
Code:
699cbf4a4254ff76a5964f5cce8562c3d6fe49ae70e6c57be11ad0167392935a2cb9d90570626dcb0dd1e1ba484d6cebcf27497f076c4c923c183578b0db92bf *rm-1013_2.0.0.11.tar

Answer from Microsoft about latest version of GPL source code in firmware:
On 26.03.2015 2:02, Kalle Ryynänen ([email protected]) (LCA) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your interest in the X2. Regarding your question, version 2.0.0.11 and versions 2.1.xxx contain the same GPL licensed Open Source Software.
>
> The cd containing version 2.0.0.11 that we provided to you contains the latest GPL licensed Open Source Software used in X2.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Open Source Team
>
> Microsoft Mobile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only one question. Why towelroot doesn't work on new version of firmware 2.1.0.12 and 2.1.0.13? But works on old 2.0.0.11

[ROM][PORT][4.4.4][GT-S7390/S7392][AOSPA] ParanoidAndroid 4.6-BETA1 [DISCONTINUED]

PLEASE REFER TO THE CHANGE LOGS FOR CURRENT FEATURES.
IF IT'S NOT LISTED THERE, IT'S NOT IN THE BUILD
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
INSTRUCTIONS,
1. INSTALL TWRP OR PHILZ TOUCH (WHAT DO YOU PREFER)
[*]Wipe guide for PHILZ and TWRP
2. FACTORY RESET
3. INSTALL ROM
4. INSTALL GAPPS
4. REBOOT
CREDITS,
AOSP/Google, Cyanogenmod, Goo, XDA, Krebsmilk, giannisgx89, Liquid,
AOKP, our users, supporters and donators, everyone who's helped us in the past,
heartfelt thanks to all of you!
Links:
Development:
Change Logs
XDA Forum
Github
Gerrit
Social:
Google+
Twitter
Facebook
Thanks doriandiaconu for Port ROM!
​
Thread to discuss about our devices
XDA:DevDB Information
ParanoidAndroid 4.6 BETA 6 for the Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite S7390 & S7392, ROM for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
fbli_41
Source Code: https://github.com/github/android_kernel_samsung_kylevess
ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
ROM Firmware Required: 4.1.2 / 4.4.x
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Beta
Current Beta Version: 1
Beta Release Date: 2015-11-15
Created 2015-11-15
Last Updated 2016-02-08

Bugs
BUGS​
Same with CyanogenMod 11 for now.
Some AOSPA 4.6 features are missing.
F.A.Q.​
Q: Can work your rom on s7392 duos, or work one sim ?
A: No, as i said, bugs are same with CyanogenMod 11.

CHANGELOG​
BETA1 - 2015.11.15
initial release
​

Guess who assaulted the thanks button first

sdeepb said:
Guess who assaulted the thanks button first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...

fbli_41 said:
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhh no I've got caught

sdeepb said:
Ohhh no I've got caught
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Respect!

fbli_41 said:
Respect!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh didn't saw it.... XDA app user !

in screenshot says paranoid 4.6beta6 but for me is 4.6beta1..... how did you get that??

Good work bro

ionutzpaul61 said:
in screenshot says paranoid 4.6beta6 but for me is 4.6beta1..... how did you get that??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think because the last Paranoid Android KK version avaible is 4.6-Beta6 (I installed this one in my Galaxy S Plus too) but he wrote BETA 1 because he meant that this version for s7390 is the first build released by him.
PS: english my bad

ASWOME! Thank you for all your aswome jobs!

ionutzpaul61 said:
in screenshot says paranoid 4.6beta6 but for me is 4.6beta1..... how did you get that??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is ParanoidAndroid4-Beta6. I wrote "1" because this is "Beta1" for S7390. Got it?
Ca110 said:
I think because the last Paranoid Android KK version avaible is 4.6-Beta6 (I installed this one in my Galaxy S Plus too) but he wrote BETA 1 because he meant that this version for s7390 is the first build released by him.
PS: english my bad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"he wrote BETA 1 because he meant that this version for s7390 is the first build released by him." :good::good:
Btw this is not build. It is port.

Hi
I wanted to ask: Which rom is better for gt-s7390 cm or aosp????
P.s. i'v never tested aosp...

TechTex198 said:
Hi
I wanted to ask: Which rom is better for gt-s7390 cm or aosp????
P.s. i'v never tested aosp...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know. I didn't use this rom for long time. I haven't got the device.

fbli_41 said:
I don't know. I didn't use this rom for long time. I haven't got the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said that bugs same which are in cm11 that means only hw video enc/dec not working

TechTex198 said:
You said that bugs same which are in cm11 that means only hw video enc/dec not working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And offline charging

fbli_41 said:
And offline charging
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just installed aospa good I like only how do I can totally change language to English
P.s. with offline charging I don't get in cm11 in aospa idk

TechTex198 said:
Just installed aospa good I like only how do I can totally change language to English
P.s. with offline charging I don't get in cm11 in aospa idk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ayarlar > Dil ve giriş > Dil

In next version (beta2) you could add Apollo from your cm11 and file manager good job works fine good ROM