any way to increase the database io lagfix like my infuse 4g in the quadrant benchmark score I/O : 4240 and my tab score I/O: 1031 too low
Related
Our phones cannot display more then ~56 fps due to vsync
Test settings: JM2, samset 1.8, mimocans ext4 fix + dalvik cache sent to nand, 8gb class 6 sd, all benchmarks were only run once.
Neocore:
200mhz : 36.8 fps
400mhz : 56 fps
800mhz : 56 fps
1000mhz : 56 fps
Yes, with our cpu reduced by 80% we still beat the nexus one and other froyo omapp/snapdragon cpu's in neocore.
Quadrant: (world & moon, the others are more difficult to test)
200mhz : 40fps : 410 Quadrant
400mhz : 56fps : 789 Quadrant
800mhz : 56fps : 1532 Quadrant
1000mhz: 56fps: 1762 Quadrant
Fps2d is 56 fps at all cpu settings.
-IMPORTANT-
Due to the nature of vsync we have no idea what fps we could be getting, Generally when you scale down cpu performance the bandwidth available for the gpu decreases dramatically as the processor cannot handle the new frames to keep up with the gpu. What this is showing us is that in neocore at 1000mhz we only require 20% of the cpu to get 36.8 fps and somewhere around 300mhz to get to the 56fps vsync cap. For all i know the gpu might only be able to output 70 fps without vsync at 1,000mhz, the question is by how much does reducing the cpu speed effect the available bandwidth to the gpu
This shows us:
1. Our gpu is largely held back by the frame-limit, the cpu also has an impact on the gpu performance.
2. We need better benchmarks to test only 3d performance, many of the 3d tests in quadrant are either heavy on the cpu, or are 2d tests. And neocore is simply not taxing enough on our gpu.
3. Need to find a way to remove vsync
4. Its a powerful beast! looking forward to froyo
Look foward to GLbenchmark 2.0
Even currently in 1.1 it's showing some impressive results, even though it's not supported very well on latest-gen gpu's (SGX530/535/540 mostly)
*off topic*
Would you please link / pm me to the Sd card you are using?
Its a Samsung 8gb class 6
would underclocking the cpu to 600mhz for example help increase battery performance, or it it mostly the screen that drains the battery?
its mostly the screen
But really really great research there !
Its nice to know.. Hehe..
The next thing i would like too see is quadrant tests where the SGS has undergone the Lagfix and then with different SD cards
guys what is the best benchmark software?
I'm thinking SmartBench 2011. Test multi threads
Don't use Quadrant. It's only good for making your E-weenis look much bigger than it really is.
actually quadrant global is good doesn't test I/O
its not popular as it should be but that's becasue it doesn't show retarded inaccurate I/O scores caused by lagfix ext4 script like standard quadrant does
I installed CM7 with DSC Phoenix test2,overclock to 1344MHz.
when I bench with Quadrant Advanced ver2.1, my score is >1300 to 1400.
It's lower than my old milestone 1 (with CPU 600 MHz Cortex-A8 and GPU PowerVR SGX530, overclock to 1,1Ghz). quadrant score of milestone1 is > 1700. I dont know why?
And this morning I tested with HTC Incredible S of my friend (CPU 1 GHz Scorpion
and GPU Adreno 205, ICS rom without overclock). Score is > 1900.
Is my streak weak? I cant believe streak5 is slower than milestone1 and HTC Incredible S.
how about you?
I think many on here will agree with me when I say forget about the benchmark scores. They largely mean nothing as it relates to real world performance and you can drive yourself crazy trying to tweak your phone to death to increase the numbers. With that being said, the performance hit is likely in the file i/o section.
As normal user and not a programmer, I dont understand about the file i/o section. But thanks you, Lordmorphous. So I'll forget foolish scores, what a stupid app =))
File I/O = File input and output, which in simpler language is the act of reading and writing to the MicroSD cards.
Quadrant and other such benchmark tools are fun to run, but they don't mean much. To properly test a device requires a benchmark program like Futuremark's PCMark, which includes real-world applications and simulates real-world usage. There is no such benchmark app for Android however.
though, if you guys notice the benchmark for the quadrant advance 2.x, the i/o score for our DS5 does a bit low compared to others but... well you know, it just numbers... nothing more.. nothing less...
however, cpu power does have the impact when overclocked, for let say using default cpu speed of 1ghz, software decoding is a bit slow compared to overclocked 1.2ghz...
just my 2 cents
Hey Guys,
what about having a thread, dedicated to Benchmarks, Performance Settings, Firmware, Tweaks and other Drugs you are on
So here is what I'm using:
RAZR HD - XT925
- Stock ROM
- Unlocked BL
- Rooted
- Android Tweaker -> Autotweak
Quadrant Score:
- 5032
CPU: 9789
Memory: 8727
I/O: 3439
2D: 1000
3D: 2206
Antutu Benchmark:
-10344
CPU Integer: 1536
CPU Float: 2260
2D: 1087
3D: 2801
Database I/O: 555
SD-Card write: 149
SD-Card read: 191
AnTuTu 3dRating:
3d Score 2899
Off-Screen: 820
Feel free to post your Settings and Benchmarkresults
Greetz Esok
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
How did u get over 47k in antutu?
Geekbench isn't really a good source at the moment. It is limited to 32-bit, so it can't utilize the full potential of the SoC.
They need to release a 64-bit compliant version to really be able to run the tests correctly.
elkay said:
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not BM mine yet but based on those numbers.... WOW!!!!
I am also considering the price of the phone vs the scores when I say that.
The S6 comes in at nearly 68k on Antutu but the 48k score still puts this phone in the current top 10.
ze551ml antutu test :
Also...
Antutu: 48475