[Q] Path and Compile wpa_supplicant_6 - Galaxy S I9000 General

I wanted to patch wpa_supplicant using diff.txt found here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7711198&postcount=6 I managed to download the android source code using the instructions found here http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html. I then figured out my SGS used wpa_supplicant v0.6.10 so I went to downloadedSource/external/wpa_supplicant_6/wpa_supplicant and did
Code:
patch < diff.txt
. I got a message that 2 files were successfully patched. From here, I cannot find any helpful instructions as to how to compile the patched files. Running the patch itself was fairly easy. The reason I don't want to use the precompiled file from the post that I got the diff.txt is because it is compiled with froyo sources. Froyo's wpa_supplicant has a bug that won't let me use mschapv2 authentication. I tried to run make but it tells me includes.h is missing.
I am running Fedora 14 x64 and my SGS is running android 2.3.4 xxjvp.
Never mind. I figured it out.

Share the file

Final Product
I had to put in in a 7zip since the direct binary gave me an "invalid file" error. As stated before, it uses the diff.txt as a patch from another xda user. All credit goes to that person for figuring out what changes needed to be made. When I compiled, it said that it was using gingerbread 2.3.4 sources. I also made sure it was v0.6.10 (since that is what xxjvp comes with).
I'm not sure if you have to do this but when I moved the file into /system/bin I made sure that everyone had read and execute permissions but not write permissions.
Hope it works for you too.

Related

[TOOL/KITCHEN] - Android Builder v.5 (Dead)

This project is no longer being updated. Feel free to use the code.
Android Builder (AB v.5)
kiel123 has joined the AB team!
Thanks to dsixda, Armin Coralic, and cteneyck. I do have permission to reuse their code.
Requirements:
Ubuntu Linux or variant
dsixda's HTC Android Basic Kitchen - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=633246
In my crazy quest to learn more about Android, I decided to create a companion to dsixda's kitchen that will take some of the drudgery out of downloading and compiling AOSP and the HTC kernel.
Here's what the current menus looks like:
Code:
Select the device that you would like to build for.
1) HTC Droid Eris
a) About Builder
0. Exit
Please enter option number:
and then
Code:
1. Sync AOSP - Cupcake (1.5) repo
2. Sync AOSP - Donut (1.6) repo
3. Sync AOSP - Eclair (2.1) repo
4. Sync AOSP - Froyo (2.2) repo
0. Exit
Please enter option number:
You can follow these two steps, and you will get a freshly compiled, but unsigned ROM in the original_update folder. After running it through the kitchen, it boots up just fine. Of course, most of the hardware doesn't work. That's the part that I am working on now (seriously, I am). I've been working on this for a while, because as I said - this is really about me learning. If I can make a tool that someone finds useful, then great!
Install instructions:
1) download and unzip dsixda's kitchen to whatever directory you want
2) download Android Builder into kitchen's scripts/plugins folder and unzip
3) back out and start the kitchen
4) select 'Run plugin scripts' from Advanced menu and select 'Android Builder'
5) you're there!
NOTE: This will try to install/update all of the packages that it needs, including Java5. Please look at the code so that you know what it's doing. That's just a good general practice with any code that you can actually look at and that you have to run as root...
Future plans:
1) add more kernels (devices)
2) add more vendor trees (goes along with devices)
3) add more repos (CM5, CM6, AOSP Master)
I hope someone finds this useful, and feel free to post useful suggestions/bug reports.
DOWNLOAD - (https://github.com/gnarlyc/android_builder)
CHANGELOG -
v5. - kiel123 re-wrote v.4 as a plugin to dsixda's kitchen with me testing afterward, minor fixes, removed Java6 as no longer needed by kitchen
v.4 - re-wrote to add structure to support more devices in the future
added option for Cupcake, Donut, and Froyo
added .config files that enable touchscreen in kernel by default
v.3 - unreleased build
v.2 - corrected misspellings in code and dialogs
added sudo to launch setup script (Still need to sudo bash first. Sorry.)
v.1 - initial release
Very nice. I have been doing the same. I have used darchstar's post here as the basis of my work. But, I am always glad to look how others are doing things. Thanks for the post.
arockj said:
Very nice. I have been doing the same. I have used darchstar's post here as the basis of my work. But, I am always glad to look how others are doing things. Thanks for the post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the thanks! I don't quite get the vendor tree thing, but I just need to look at it again a few times. And, that's where I'm at. It would be really neat to be able create a working AOSP ROM from scratch with minimal manual intervention. It might not be possible, but I haven't found that out yet. (But wait! If you can do it manually, it can be scripted. Right?)
there's typo in your install script
look for line: android_builder*
should be android-builder*
and your install script should use mv command instead of cp to avoid files duplication
EDIT: also you should use sudo command along with ./ab_setup script or include within script as well.
When i ran ./abmenu and i get this message
Code:
Please copy 'menu-kd' to the root of your kitchen folder with 'menu'
menu-kd?.... don't you mean abmenu? turned out it was looking for menu file which i had it renamed to kitchen_menu but I fixed that on my part and all is working well.
Dont let any of my criticism scare you away, I can see there's a lot of potential use for this scripts, great start by the way.
firestrife23 said:
there's typo in your install script
look for line: android_builder*
should be android-builder*
and your install script should use mv command instead of cp to avoid files duplication
EDIT: also you should use sudo command along with ./ab_setup script or include within script as well.
When i ran ./abmenu and i get this message
Code:
Please copy 'menu-kd' to the root of your kitchen folder with 'menu'
menu-kd?.... don't you mean abmenu? turned out it was looking for menu file which i had it renamed to kitchen_menu but I fixed that on my part and all is working well.
Dont let any of my criticism scare you away, I can see there's a lot of potential use for this scripts, great start by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I renamed all of the scripts at the last minute and thought that I had them fixed. I'll make the corrections and repost. The goal is to get this thing working well. Your criticism is just more motivation. Thanks!
I'm new to all this but I would love this to work with Froyo source.
Geo411m said:
I'm new to all this but I would love this to work with Froyo source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The current 'internal' build works with Cupcake (1.5), Eclair (2.1), and Froyo (2.2). It's not ready to release though. Give me another week or two. I'm working on proprietary bits now, so that you get a more usable ROM from the start.
Although from your sig, it appears that you don't have an Eris, so you probably don't care much about it's proprietary bits. If you want it to get Froyo instead of Eclair, you can just change 'eclair' to 'froyo' in the script that creates the repo.
I'm with you on Froyo. I have a feeling in a month or two very few people will want to run a pre-Froyo ROM. It's really nice.
rm error on install
i keep getting "rm: cannot remove './bkup': No such file or directory"
the file is there untill i run the ./install script then it disappears and shoots me an error any help would be appriciated
Sjflowerhorn said:
i keep getting "rm: cannot remove './bkup': No such file or directory"
the file is there untill i run the ./install script then it disappears and shoots me an error any help would be appriciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That files was used by me while developing the code. It's not needed. I'll fix the install script for v.5, but if you really want to fix the script now... Just remove the line -
'rm ./bkup'
from the 'install' script
You should still be able to start Android Builder by typing './abmenu', as long as it's in the same folder with the kitchen's menu. The error shouldn't matter.
gnarlyc said:
That files was used by me while developing the code. It's not needed. I'll fix the install script for v.5, but if you really want to fix the script now... Just remove the line -
'rm ./bkup'
from the 'install' script
You should still be able to start Android Builder by typing './abmenu', as long as it's in the same folder with the kitchen's menu. The error shouldn't matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
k thanks i think it worked the same even with the error but got it =)
Sjflowerhorn said:
k thanks i think it worked the same even with the error but got it =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good deal. Let me know how it goes.
gnarlyc --
Have you thought of making this into a .plugin file that can be placed in the scripts/plugins folder of the HTC Android Kitchen? Then that way you won't need to update your scripts each time I update my kitchen
In my thread I could provide a link to your tool, so that people can add that plugin if they want.
dsixda said:
gnarlyc --
Have you thought of making this into a .plugin file that can be placed in the scripts/plugins folder of the HTC Android Kitchen? Then that way you won't need to update your scripts each time I update my kitchen
In my thread I could provide a link to your tool, so that people can add that plugin if they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thought has occurred to me.
Give me a bit. A link in your thread would be great. It might even motivate me to add more devices. Getting stuck on adding Eris proprietary bits has lead me down the road of making a ROM (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=725447) and documenting the process. I'll get back to Android Builder soon though.
Ok, so...
TO-DO
-------
1) rewrite AB as a plugin to dsixda's HTC Android Kitchen
2) add proprietary bits for Eris
3) add more devices
4) add CM repos
5) add Gingerbread repo
6) add compatibility with more distros
i am getting line 28: update-java-alernatives: command not found?
lord194409 said:
i am getting line 28: update-java-alernatives: command not found?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... I've tested from a freshly installed Ubuntu installation several times. It should install everything you need.
You could try 'update-alternatives --config java' and let me know what it says. You could also look for a file called 'setup_ran' in the root of the Kitchen, and delete it. Start './abmenu' after that and try again.
thanks for answering. Could the problem be that i installed it on cygwin.
lord194409 said:
thanks for answering. Could the problem be that i installed it on cygwin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Android Builder will not work under cygwin. I don't know that it ever will. That's on the TO-DO list, but it's so far down that it's not on the posted TO-DO list.
I've only tested under Xubuntu 10.04 and minimal Ubuntu 10.04.
If you happen to work it out on cygwin, let me know! I'm sure others would be happy to have the option. Heck, I might even be. I'm mainly using Ubuntu because of AB anyway. (Although, it is kind of growing on me.)
thanks i will look in to it.
Sent from my Eris using XDA App
just wanted to let you know that it didn't work for me. It runs, gives some errors and outputs a update.zip called AOSPbase but the file is only 1.1kb in size.
Geo411m said:
just wanted to let you know that it didn't work for me. It runs, gives some errors and outputs a update.zip called AOSPbase but the file is only 1.1kb in size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have java5 and java6 jre/jdk installed. it should work then. i had a similar issue the first time through... took it literally 10hours plus, then output was the 1.1k AOSPBase.zip file.
manually installed all java components, and everything worked perfectly then (and took half the time)

[TOOL] pySignare - Quickly Sign APKs [Windows]

pySignare
"-to sign"
v1.0​
Version 1.0
Complete re-write into python.
Prerequisites
Windows (for now)
Java
Get Java here --> https://www.java.com/en/download/
Python 3.x
Get 3.3.4 here --> http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.3.4/
Instructions
Download
Extract
Copy Unsigned APKs Into "UnsignedApks"
Run "pySignare.py"
Follow On-Screen Prompts
Thats It
Future Development
Make X-Platform - (Shouldn't be too hard)
Minor code tidy up
Currently its bundled with TestExample.apk (just an empty renamed zip) so it can be tested straight away.
DOWNLOAD HERE (Download ZIP - Right hand side)
Please post your experience, and if you encounter any errors, let me know and I'll attempt to fix.
FAQ
Q. I get the error - 'java' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
A. You either, do not have the Java installed or have not added java to your PATH in Environment Variables. Either install Java or add Java to your PATH.
Thanks dude.
Any feedback, problems or suggestions?
wow it works! Easy to use! thanks!
Thank you.
Are there any Linux wizards out there who can help me port this?
New version 0.3 available.
tried it all i get is cannot find specified path
edit: forget that i fixed it had to modify the it as im using jdk 1.7.0
I don't know why I changed it, but in v0.3 it assumes you have installed the Java Development Kit (JDK) on a 64bit system (it mirrors my system rather than a universal approach).
If you have java added to your windows PATH, try using these files, just extract these to the same directory and run these instead.
works great! small suggestion is for the batch file to ask for the location of your jdk.
also have error checking as the batch said it worked but didnt at first (due to the location of the jdk)
andyharney said:
I don't know why I changed it, but in v0.3 it assumes you have installed the Java Development Kit (JDK) on a 64bit system (it mirrors my system rather than a universal approach).
If you have java added to your windows PATH, try using these files, just extract these to the same directory and run these instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using a 64 bit system I have jdk on both program files 64 bit and (x86) and the path in the test keys ran to jdk 1.6.0_25(x86) so I used notepad ++ edit it to 1.7.0(x86) tried again it signed and zipalinged no problem
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Your right, I wrote this quickly to fulfil my needs on my system.
I will update to v0.4 with error checking & JDK checking soon.
Thanks for the suggestion.
EDIT: Seems you beat me to the reply leith. If your JDK is added to your windows path then it shouldnt matter whether its 32 or 64 bit. When I updated from v0.2 to v0.3 I used my personal build rather than the universal "java" approach. I can see that as explicit paths are specified in the .bat. v0.4 will add error checking and will most probably include a stripped out java package.
awesome! keep up the good work dude
andyharney said:
DOWNLOAD HERE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unable to dl now: Fatal error: Method ExceptionDisplay::__toString() must not throw an exception in /home/aharney/public_html/index.php on line 644
?
Try using a different browser, that error is quite rare and unique to certain localised versions of windows + firefox.
Version 0.4 now out.
Flawless victory brilliant Andy
im no stranger to signing apks
both of us know this tool is the best
better than any other signtool
never gonna give this up
not gonna desert this tool...
I saw what you did there. Version 0.5 will replace icon.png in every apk with a png of his face.
I can't download the file
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /index.php on this server.
Additionally, a 500 Internal Server Error error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I had to take the site down again. Been hit with 2 DDoS attacks in the last 3 days. I don't know why.
I will have it back up at some point tonight. I will PM you when its back up.

How to build AOSP for Nexus 7?

I would like to mess with trying to install my own customized ROM's to my Nexus 7, but the first place to probably start is with being able to build AOSP as-is from source.
As I understand currently, building is only supported on Linux and OS X, but I can easily get Ubuntu 10.04 and re-partition my HDD to give it about 100GB (if that much is even needed).
Looking at:
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
I need to choose a branch and setup the Linux environment. I'm a bit confused as to what branch I should choose though. I want the latest source of Android available at the time, so I should pick the master branch? Or since I'm only building for the Nexus 7, should I choose it's device-specific branch instead? Although looking at:
http://source.android.com/source/build-numbers.html
the Nexus 7 is only at android-4.1.1_r1.1, but I could of sworn I heard there was r4 out already.
As for setting up the Linux environment, I hope I can just follow all the commands listed there without any problem.
Proceeding on with:
http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html
It looks like a pretty straightforward process that I'm also hoping can be done successfully if I follow the commands exactly as presented. I don't have a proxy nor the need for a local mirror either.
And then moving onto:
http://source.android.com/source/building-devices.html
Some stuff there I find a little bit confusing. It would seem I have to first get proprietary drivers, which all 4 seem to be placed conveniently at:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/drivers#grouper
From there, I imagine I can move the script that's bundled inside to the root of the source folder, run it, and follow the instructions. I don't exactly know what the root of the source folder is, but it would probably be obvious once I did start trying to build this. But once I did find it, I would run (using Nvidia's Graphics driver for the example) sh extract-nvidia-grouper.sh in Terminal, and it would place the right files where they need to be.
I don't understand the make clobber part too well at all; should I run this on the very first build, later builds, or all builds?
And once the source and drivers are all downloaded and available, I should then run lunch full_grouper-userdebug and then finally make -j# (# being some number in accordance with how many cores on my CPU I have). I have a triple-core CPU at 3.5Ghz, and I have the ability to unlock to quad-core at 3.3Ghz (but prefer to stay on triple). Should I just run -j32? Also will this build the Kernel as well, or will I have to get the source for that and compile it separately?
And once the build completes, my plan from there was to just go back to Windows and flash it. And if I managed to get it to flash and boot properly, I assume I would of succeeded with compiling AOSP from source
I noticed that userdebug part on full_grouper-userdebug gives "root access and debuggability". Does this mean it comes with some program like Superuser or SuperSU already installed? Or does this mean I can easily install those?
Perhaps after I get comfortable with the basics of flashing AOSP as-is, I can then try to mess with different types of optimizations, like Linaro and perhaps even messing with many types of optimizations from different kernels like faux123 has done .
I also have a 360kb/s DSL connection, so downloading the entire source the first time will probably take a good while. But once I have the source, I take it I don't have to redownload the entire thing for patches and stuff?
Any and all guidance is welcome
Bump before I go for tonight
Bump
You have a bunch of questions. I will answer some. And while I whole-heartedly support learning to build you don't need to build to flash roms.
The best advice I can give you is to just start building. You have found a bunch of instructions and links, obviously. Go ahead and begin, and tackle problems as they arise.
Environment
Okay...really the hardest part is setting upi the environment, if you don' t know linux. After downloading and installing Java and the SDK, make sure you add them to your path.
Most guides will have adding the path in the directions. But make sure to check that it works! It will be extremely frustrating, and you won't know what is wrong. Go to a random directory, Documents would be good, and enter java -version and then adb devices. If the computer says it cannot find the commands, then your path is the problem.
Make sure to setup udev. It is easy, Google it.
Building
Branch
You want to build from the tags.
Code:
repo init -u https://android.googlesource.com/platform/manifest -b android-4.1.1_r4
For the proprietary blobs, whatever directory you repo sync from (~/android/system or whatever) is the root directory. run the extraction from there.
when the proprietary blobs are extracted, and the source has been downloaded, these are your commands.
Code:
. build/envsetup.sh
lunch
Lunch will return a list of devices, Grouper is the Nexus 7, it is number 4. eng and user-debug do have root access, but SU and SuperSU are more than just root, they manage the root access for your apps as well. You can download them from Play or install them as a flashable-zip.
Choose 4 and then
Code:
make otapackage
don't worry about the -j# part. Your machine almost definitley cannot handle -j32. It is -j4 by default, that should be fine for your cpu.
If you want to enable faster builds, you can enter
ENABLE_CCACHE=1
before make otapackage, but it will take up a lot of space on your hd. Your subsequent builds will use some thing from your intial build instead of rebuilding them each time (kernel and other things). So even if you repo sync, some changes won't be reflected in your later builds. For instance, if you do not clean your prebuilts and build system, your build date in the build.prop will always stay the same as the first build.
The way you clear the build directory and make new everything is with make clean or make clobber. You can run it before any build, but the build will take much much longer than one that uses prebuilts. Non-clobbered and with ccache enabled are the fastest of all. But subsequent builds are pretty fast even without ccache.
When you want to update your source, you can just go to your root dir and repo sync. It will only update your source, it won't take nearly as long.
Okay, I answered more than I intended. There are a million guides that show you every step in the process.
Don't ask anymore generic worry questions...you're ready. You understand more than most people do before their first build before I even posted. Get started and if you run into problems, search. If you can't find the answer, then come back and ask us.
Good luck. it is easy, and very satisfying.
I finally got around to installing a Virtual Machine, and Ubuntu 10.04 After doing that, I fully updated Ubuntu, installed VMWare Tools, and then proceeded to start trying to acquire the AOSP source.
Getting sun-java-6 was a bit tricky, but not too hard (I ran the commands exactly as listed on the site, but the package didn't exist; had to get it from somewhere else). After that, I proceeded to do everything else, except CCache (I didn't know what .bashrc was, but I'll look further into this with future AOSP builds).
I then made the folder, did repo sync, and I'm now acquiring the source now from android-4.1.1_r4. As a quick question, does it matter whether I choose to build from android-4.1.1_r4, or master? Would master be more up-to-date?
espionage724 said:
I finally got around to installing a Virtual Machine, and Ubuntu 10.04 After doing that, I fully updated Ubuntu, installed VMWare Tools, and then proceeded to start trying to acquire the AOSP source.
Getting sun-java-6 was a bit tricky, but not too hard (I ran the commands exactly as listed on the site, but the package didn't exist; had to get it from somewhere else). After that, I proceeded to do everything else, except CCache (I didn't know what .bashrc was, but I'll look further into this with future AOSP builds).
I then made the folder, did repo sync, and I'm now acquiring the source now from android-4.1.1_r4. As a quick question, does it matter whether I choose to build from android-4.1.1_r4, or master? Would master be more up-to-date?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for late answer, no, use the r4 branch as it is more up to date. Also, make clobber every time isn't needed but you should as it remove then entire out folder (wich is where compiled stuff go) and this make sure you rebuild a clean thing.
Building CyanogenMod 10
Dunno if this is of any interest, but I have a thread started with a complete walkthrough for building CyanogenMod10 for Nexus 7.
Most of the info is the same, and there are some tips in the comments as well.
espionage724 said:
I would like to mess with trying to install my own customized ROM's to my Nexus 7, but the first place to probably start is with being able to build AOSP as-is from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, how did you get on? I've been following the same path I think - repo sync the source and follow Google's own tutorial on compiling Android but with the added step of incorporating the binary drivers for the grouper.
I've built the .img files using make -j8, that all works, fastboot flash worked, but I get no video out when booting up using the new OS. I can ADB into the Nexus and it's certainly booted and working okay apart from, I'm guessing, the missing binary drivers.
I've used each of the 5 binary driver scripts to populate the "vendor" directory in the root of the downloaded source before compiling from scratch, but perhaps I've missed a step, so I'm curious as to whether you've got a fully working AOSP+binary driver compile working.
(By the way, my build environment was Ubuntu 12.04 64bit, SDK r20.0.3, Android 4.1.1 (JRO03R) source, Sun Java 1.6, and it all seems to work well using 8 threads on a Core i5 2500K + 4GB RAM).
Edit:
I re-ran the binary extraction, did a make clean; make clobber, and re-compiled - and now video works. Everything works now apart from the compass, camera and rotation sensor. I also tried compiling CyanogenMod from source, too, and had the exact same three problems. Everything works, and works well, apart from camera, compass and rotation sensor. All of which work in the stock Google ROM. Weird.
OK, So I've just compiled an OTA update package from AOSP source... my question is this:
I already have unlocked the bootloader on my wife's Nexus 7, installed Clockworkmod, rooted it, installed busybox, etc, manually on the stock 4.2 update I downloaded from Google on the device when it asked me to upgrade.
Is the otapackage I just compiled going to replace my custom recovery if I flash it as is? I've looked, and it has a "recovery" folder in the .zip, whereas any of the custom ROMs I have downloaded for my phone do not. Do I simply delete this recovery folder, and flash away? Do I need to edit the updater-script? I'm still trying to read and learn about this, but I haven't gotten a good answer from google or searching this site for my specific problem... maybe I'm wording my searches incorrectly.
I would just rather not have to go back and reinstall Clockworkmod... I know that if I want to have busybox, SuperSU, and other apps installed when I flash I'm going to have to add them to the zip and resign... I just don't want to mess my recovery. And being that this is my wife's tab (and not mine to play with, as she pointed out ) I don't want her to get the impression that I'm having to "fix" something I "broke" lol.
hallowed.mh said:
OK, So I've just compiled an OTA update package from AOSP source... my question is this:
I already have unlocked the bootloader on my wife's Nexus 7, installed Clockworkmod, rooted it, installed busybox, etc, manually on the stock 4.2 update I downloaded from Google on the device when it asked me to upgrade.
Is the otapackage I just compiled going to replace my custom recovery if I flash it as is? I've looked, and it has a "recovery" folder in the .zip, whereas any of the custom ROMs I have downloaded for my phone do not. Do I simply delete this recovery folder, and flash away? Do I need to edit the updater-script? I'm still trying to read and learn about this, but I haven't gotten a good answer from google or searching this site for my specific problem... maybe I'm wording my searches incorrectly.
I would just rather not have to go back and reinstall Clockworkmod... I know that if I want to have busybox, SuperSU, and other apps installed when I flash I'm going to have to add them to the zip and resign... I just don't want to mess my recovery. And being that this is my wife's tab (and not mine to play with, as she pointed out ) I don't want her to get the impression that I'm having to "fix" something I "broke" lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry if a bit late, but here are some answers:
yes, the rom will replace your recovery. but if you delete the recovery folder and delete every line containing the word "recovery" in the updater-script, you should be good to go.
And if you accidentally remove the recovery, you can always flash it back very easily using: "fastboot flash recovery [filename.img]" (your n7 has to be in the bootloader)
And again, yes, you will have to put the extra apps into the zip and update the updater-script to install them too.
Also, you will need the gapps package if you want to use the play store and other google apps.
Hope this helped
Nexus 7 3G does not boot after flashing AOSP
Hi,
I followed the steps provided on source.android.com to build and flash the AOSP for Nexus 7 3G Tilapia. After successful flash, the device does not show anything after Google logo. Please help me out.
Thanks,
Veeren
Compile with ccache makes build time extremely fast.
How to do:
_Open a terminal
_Install ccache:
sudo apt-get install ccache
_Open .bashrc:
sudo gedit ~/.bashrc
_Add these lines:
#ccache
export USE_CCACHE=1
_Save and exit
_Sync source code
_After source synced, run in same terminal (in root directory of your source):
prebuilts/misc/linux-x86/ccache/ccache -M 20G (20G is the size in giga of space allocated for ccache, change it as you want)
_Start building
How to see if ccache works:
_Open another terminal in the root directory of your source and type:
watch -n1 -d prebuilts/misc/linux-x86/ccache/ccache -s
First build using ccache may be a little much longer but the others will be faster...
veerndra said:
Hi,
I followed the steps provided on source.android.com to build and flash the AOSP for Nexus 7 3G Tilapia. After successful flash, the device does not show anything after Google logo. Please help me out.
Thanks,
Veeren
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you pull the proprietary files for your nexus and include them in the build? I believe things like your video drivers are included in there, so if those are missing....
I think the prop files are available for download from Google on source.android.com... If not, they tell you how to use an included script to pull them via adb. I can't remember... It's been a while since I built vanilla AOSP.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda app-developers app
Modifying stock AOSP
I have built AOSP following the Google tutorial.
I am compiling using the master branch and
Code:
aosp_grouper-userdebug
.
I have downloaded and extracted the appropriate proprietary binaries.
I am modifying two files in the source tree (see attachments; search for "// MODIFICATION ADDED HERE" to find my changes). Will these changes work? I am using Eclipse, set up in the exact way the tutorial explains, and I am not receiving any new errors.
When I compile the source using the following commands
Code:
$ . build/envsetup.sh
$ lunch aosp_grouper-userdebug
$ make fastboot adb
and flash it to my device with
Code:
$ fastboot -w flashall
BEFORE my modifications, it works just fine. The android-info.txt file and all the image files are produced properly.
However, AFTER adding the modifications, the build completes with no errors, but android-info.txt and all image files are no longer produced.
Why am I experiencing these problems? What can I do to make it work the way I want?
P.S. YES, I am aware that my modifications are not secure; these are for my own purposes, not for a public build.

Problems Unpacking/Packing kernel

Hi!
I am trying to create a custom kernel for my Galaxy Note 3. I have successfully modified and built the kernel. Now I want to actually test it. I've searched for possible methods to create a boot.img file from my zImage. I've tried
mkbootimg and unmkbootimg
kernel kitchen
I was able to create a boot.img with both methods and both of them failed to boot. I thought I messed up the kernel, BUT then I tried to just unpack a stock boot.img and repack it again - and this also failed with both methods.
Seeing as there are already people who made custom kernels for the Note 3, I'm wondering what I am doing wrong. Also I'm a bit new to this, that may also be a factor. Could someone possibly give a hint what might be going awry? Will of course provide additional information, if required.
Edit: nevermind that, found out I need Snapdragon 800 patched mkbootimg tools. found binary versions of them on github (Can't post link because I'm a new user). unsure where the source code is though.

New file_contexts.bin format and make_ext4fs

Trying to alter a stock ROM and resign with my own custom key just for myself. This process will allow me to use a device with custom changes (NOT root), but still allow me to use Android Pay.
This process involves using the "make_ext4fs" tool. However, this tool (as far as I can tell) requires using the old plaintext version of "file_contexts". Android 7+ uses a new binary version of this file instead ("file_contexts.bin").
So if anyone can solve either of these questions, I would be very grateful:
1) Is there a tool to convert my device's binary "file_contexts.bin" to the old plaintext "file_contexts"? -OR-
2) Is there a build of "make_ext4fs" that accepts the new binary format "file_contexts.bin"? I tried to build the new nougat version myself from AOSP, but after a successful build of the tool, I can't get the thing to read files on either 64-bit or 32-bit systems. It yields an error "No such file or directory" when trying to point to file_contexts. I am not a great C developer, so I don't know if I built it wrong. For reference, no, I am not missing the lib32stdc++6 libraries. I have attached the binary if you want to see if you can get it to work. -OR-
3) If anyone has the file_contexts text file for the OnePlus 3, ROM version 7.X Nougat, that would work too!​
Any help anyone can offer in any way would be fantastic! Thank you so much for your time to look at this!
A good question
1) yes, see my signature
munjeni said:
1) yes, see my signature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm trying to do the same with a 7.1.1. rom. I convert the file_contexts.bin to file_contexts, unpack the rom, do the modifications to the rom, repack the rom then replace the original system.new.dat and system.transfer.list with the newly packed ones (original file_contexts.bin is still in the original zip) and when I go to flash it in TWRP it doesn't flash the system and I get a No OS installed Is there something I have to do to the file_contexts.bin after I repack the system.new.dat?
"file_contexts.bin" to the old plaintext "file_contexts" tool: http://blog.cofface.com/archives/2255.html
puargs said:
I tried to build the new nougat version myself from AOSP, but after a successful build of the tool, I can't get the thing to read files on either 64-bit or 32-bit systems. It yields an error "No such file or directory" when trying to point to file_contexts. I am not a great C developer, so I don't know if I built it wrong. For reference, no, I am not missing the lib32stdc++6 libraries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try building with the pie (Position Independent Executable) flag. Had this exact same problem when trying to compile a CVE for android.
Hopefully this should work for you and sorry for the Necro post

Categories

Resources