Function....
Terrible name if that's what it turns out to be.
http://pocketnow.com/android/galaxy-s-2-us-carrier-branding-confirmed
Terrible name, but it also looks like Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint are sticking with the "vanilla" design. Maybe Samsung/Google pushed them to for faster updates?
Terrible name. The Attain is the only one that sounds alright.
Sent from my Fascinate with CM7 Gingerbread
TheSonicEmerald said:
Terrible name. The Attain is the only one that sounds alright.
Sent from my Fascinate with CM7 Gingerbread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't buy it... The site claims it also has a kickstand. Really?
Not all of our galaxy s models are the same. The captivate has a completely different design. And the epic has a keyboard. Why can't the "function" have a kickstand?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I don't care what they call it. Just tell us when it's going to be released.
The name sucks, simple as that. It doesn't make much sense in how they are treating the SGS phones in the US. While most other phones are sticking a II at the end of there already well known phones; the SGS phones not only get stupid generic names in the first place but now they are making the same mistake again. They can't have a Fascinate II because of the bad taste in everyone's mouth, but why not just keep the name Samsung has developed into a powerhouse in much of the world?
That being said, I hope Verizon has a different strategy for deploying their updates this time around. Fascinate users without the latest software knew their device was lacking Function other phones had practically forever.
Wow, those are some of the crappiest names I've ever seen for phones.
Bow chika wah wah
I call it the bast damn phone this year.....
I also call it, the galaxy S2.....
and last, but no least....I will call it mine!
DirgeExtinction said:
Wow, those are some of the crappiest names I've ever seen for phones.
Bow chika wah wah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, Samsung's done worse. They have a phone called the Samsung Yes, it's name is a smiley face.
Avelnan said:
Not all of our galaxy s models are the same. The captivate has a completely different design. And the epic has a keyboard. Why can't the "function" have a kickstand?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree with you, however... The site clearly shows a silicone case for all three devices, suggesting they are all the same form factor. So, sure, all three could have a kickstand. But the case doesn't even show an opening for it. So it's either fake, or the copy team and the graphics team forgot to have a meeting that day.
According to Phandroid, all of those names might still just be codenames like the HTC Supersonic becoming the Evo 4G upon release (only in this case, the codename was better imho). Incidentally, T-Mobile simply named its latest Samsung smartphone the Galaxy S 4G. I still think, though, Verizon will want to give their phone a unique name. If so, let me throw the "Andromeda" hat into the name ring (you see how it's a unique name that still refers to a galaxy?)
Of course, the "Verizon Amputate" is a more fitting name to reflect Verizon's history of bloatware and software updates crippling an excellent phone hardware-wise Plus, it rhymes with Fascinate - everyone say it with me now - "Fascinate!" "Amputate!" "Fascinate!" "Amputate!" We should count our blessings, though - at least Verizon has always allowed us to install apps not listed in the Android Market (case in point: the Amazon App store). It took the entry of a heavy hitter in online content (the aforementioned Amazon) before AT&T saw the light.
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
I like the idea of naming it something related to astronomy. The Fascinate had ringtones such as Vega, Sirius, and Arcturus, all important stars that light up the night's sky.
Function is utterly ridiculous. At least the Vibrant and Fascinate were adjectives that could describe something you'd see in the sky. Epic didn't make a whole lot of sense but I didn't have much of a problem with it, considering the overuse of that word these days you can't blame them for trying.
Still, they are basically de-branding these devices. Which I suppose Verizon and the like want, so they have the big name and not the manufacturers. It also helps to isolate the phone just in case it is an utter disappointment, like the Fascinate being one of the very last phones to receive FroYo. A lot of us have suggested we won't buy Samsung again, but if we do, it certainly won't be something called the Fascinate II right?
Kevin Gossett said:
I don't buy it... The site claims it also has a kickstand. Really?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The picture is of a case for the phone and the case has a kickstand......
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Function is perfect. Follow me here. Function is short for functional. Something verizon's galaxy s phones have never truly been. So its perfect advertising to let people know that they listened to their customers and built a better "functional"phone. (disclaimer: I don't know anything about the gs2, I also don't know anyone at sammy or verizon, nor am I a psychic.) (second disclaimer: in case you did not figure it out, its all in jest) ;p
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
heres a couple i thought of that keep to astronomy for its name
samsung- eclipse
antimatter
event horizon (lol)
extinction
extragalactic
halo
nucleus
nebula
nuetron
nuetrino
nova
fission
orbit
protostar
pulsar
radiant
resonance
singularity
supernova
TERMINATOR
trojan (lol)
zenith
or perhaps just galaxy s2 OR the samsung "verizon needs to get off their dead ass and get something cool before the other providers and release it already" s2.
Or perhaps the 'Galaxy S Rapture'?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
thefunkbot said:
The picture is of a case for the phone and the case has a kickstand......
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should look at it again...
It says it has an "opening for the phone's kickstand"
farewell_goodbye2u said:
Or perhaps the 'Galaxy S Rapture'?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With that name it would never be seen but predicted every few years
Sorry couldnt resist
piizzadude said:
With that name it would never be seen but predicted every few years
Sorry couldnt resist
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zing!! Lol
[xTrigger]
SCH-I500 - EC01 Radio/JT's CyanogenMod7 (Gingerbread)
Related
UPDATE: Someone has had a hands on with the phone, it's REAL! It's a Samsung Galazy S running stock Android!
SOURCE
boy you just love jumping the gun after reading half the story huh? second topic in one day, ouch.
http://androidspin.com/2010/10/28/debunking-the-nexus-s/
http://www.droid-life.com/2010/10/28/samsung-announcing-the-nexus-two-on-november-8th/ (read the update at the top)
Thanks for cluttering the boards with more useless crap.
No chance in hell. I think it'll be the dual screen phone.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
It's going to be a Windows 7 phone for sure. Heard it from Microsoft.
tlogank said:
I did say rumored...and besides, you have sources saying one thing, I found some saying others...what makes what I said crap and not what you said crap?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all anything from "an anonymous tipster" has no place being considered as legitimate, even for a rumor. Second, there have been three Android Dev Phones, the ADP1, ADP2, and the Nexus 1. All three of these phones have been manufactured by HTC. Why would they change now? Third, anyone who is keeping up with android news knows the Samsung Continuum is Samsung's next android phone, and it hasn't been announced yet. Also if look at the picture on the event invitation it shows Android icons on top of a stock ticker, one of the callout features of the continuum second screen. Even if i'm wrong about them announcing the continuum Nov. 8'th (which I very well may be) I know that i'm not wrong about them NOT announcing this Nexus 2 or Nexus S or whatever the believers want to call it. The CEO is more likely to get up on stage and poop a unicorn.
sonofskywalker3 said:
First of all anything from "an anonymous tipster" has no place being considered as legitimate, even for a rumor. Second, there have been three Android Dev Phones, the ADP1, ADP2, and the Nexus 1. All three of these phones have been manufactured by HTC. Why would they change now? Third, anyone who is keeping up with android news knows the Samsung Continuum is Samsung's next android phone, and it hasn't been announced yet. Also if look at the picture on the event invitation it shows Android icons on top of a stock ticker, one of the callout features of the continuum second screen. Even if i'm wrong about them announcing the continuum Nov. 8'th (which I very well may be) I know that i'm not wrong about them NOT announcing this Nexus 2 or Nexus S or whatever the believers want to call it. The CEO is more likely to get up on stage and poop a unicorn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess what...you were wrong. Too bad the unicorn can't fly from your butt instead:
http://gizmodo.com/5676008/hands-on-the-nexus-two-by-samsung
Stop cluttering the board up with useless rants.
adrynalyne said:
Personally, I think you both clutter the board. Why you thought this was development material, I don't know...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Shut up adrynalyne;-) love u man. Jk. Fyi supposedly someone at gizmodo played with it. U know the guys who found the iPhone 4 on the floor that was........not fake. It might be real. But its likely not what they r releasing on November 8. Whatever wouldn't surprise me if they our out a phone with gingerbread and can't give me ****ing froyo
Sent from my SCH-I500-Fascinate using XDA App
You could at least wait until it's released, so then we'll actually know if this will help development. We don't actually know if this thing exists (despite what Gizmodo says) yet or what hardware is inside it (it's not a Galaxy S phone if it's the Nexus Two considering Galaxy S phones have TouchWiz built in), so this is basically not helpful at all.
@OP... I understand why you might have thought this belonged in the Dev section, but the truth is that this is at best, hearsay, and belongs in General.
Thread cleaned & moved to General.
@everyone else... Personally, I have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to flaming and being rude. If you think a post / thread does not belong in a particular section or that it is redundant, use the "Report Post" feature to bring it to my attention instead of starting a war.
KEEP IT CLEAN!
Yeah, just because Gizmodo says "one of our friends" got a hands on with the device doesn't mean it's real. It's all still rumors. I could say my wife's, brother in law's, step brother works for samsung and he said it's going to be the continuum. doesn't make it fact, or even any more likely. I stand by my analysis.
sonofskywalker3 said:
Yeah, just because Gizmodo says "one of our friends" got a hands on with the device doesn't mean it's real. It's all still rumors. I could say my wife's, brother in law's, step brother works for samsung and he said it's going to be the continuum. doesn't make it fact, or even any more likely. I stand by my analysis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually using the device right now thank you. Google and Apple designed the phone together, and commissioned Samsung to build it instead of HTC. They are banding together to fight WP7.
Sent from my iPhone 5 powered by Honeycomb using XDA App
I stand corrected. If Daswolven says its true it must be. He has a reputation for being a straight shooter.
Sent from my Fascinate using XDA App
sonofskywalker3 said:
I stand corrected. If Daswolven says its true it must be. He has a reputation for being a straight shooter.
Sent from my Fascinate using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rofl.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/01/samsung-nexus-two-rumor-simply-not-true/
Google and Apple? Riiiight.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
http://tinyurl.com/4932utj
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
XtaC318 said:
http://tinyurl.com/4932utj
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can "speak out" all they want, but until they deliver, I'm not buying anything they say. As someone in the comments wrote, "talk is cheap". I honestly don't think ANY carrier / manufacturer is this bad with an update.
nimaim said:
They can "speak out" all they want, but until they deliver, I'm not buying anything they say. As someone in the comments wrote, "talk is cheap". I honestly don't think ANY carrier / manufacturer is this bad with an update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This article is why I love Engadget and all of the posts. It can become quite entertaining at times and that thread is very heated. People are beyond pissed off and all Samsung can still say is "soon"? WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT SAMSUNG! They should change the phone name to "The Daikatana 4G."
Let's see if anyone is old enough to get that reference.
flash_c4 said:
They should change the phone name to "The Daikatana 4G."
Let's see if anyone is old enough to get that reference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung's about to make you it's b!tch!
Daikatana was actually released, you should use DNF as a reference instead.
EDIT how I wish Google did all the software work, the manufacturer just did hardware (and sometimes drivers), and the carrier just provided the service. It'd be like a real computer, and it would work.
Yeah, until we see an official ROM release from Samsung, their statement is nothing more than damage control for bad publicity. Their Twitter "support" was being bombarded with messages last night; it drew much attention from other tech sites. Samsung's next step is to come up with with an official (vague) excuse for the delay and then hope it tides the community over...
It's been half a year, promises are pretty shallow at this point.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
So Samsung says "The Reports aren't true." Way to go with some serious insight. I bet their next response will be when someone calls them frauds they'll say "I know you are but what am I?"
"You're a phoney! Hey,this guys a great big phoney!" -HC
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
My response to Samsung:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=angi1vwUkQc
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOVXh4xM-Ww#t=2m (Substitute Samsung when he says the Fed)
murso74 said:
"You're a phoney! Hey,this guys a great big phoney!" -HC
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOLLLL
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Folks keep in mind this was pretty much a direct response to the accusations that they're charging for upgrades. I'm not saying I believe the response or that they haven't been awful at providing an update or adequate communication.
What I'm saying is you clearly have to make accusations to get a response (true or not).
AndrewZorn said:
Daikatana was actually released, you should use DNF as a reference instead.
EDIT how I wish Google did all the software work, the manufacturer just did hardware (and sometimes drivers), and the carrier just provided the service. It'd be like a real computer, and it would work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like source code with my driver modules please
AndrewZorn said:
Daikatana was actually released, you should use DNF as a reference instead.
EDIT how I wish Google did all the software work, the manufacturer just did hardware (and sometimes drivers), and the carrier just provided the service. It'd be like a real computer, and it would work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then windows might try and take over our phones!! noooooo
Screw samsung. As much as I love my Epic 4G's hardware, all their support and the community is much smaller. I probably will never buy Samsung again. I might even sell it and eat the ETF once the new androids/windows come out with dual cores.
lol they said soon......samsung should just stop selling phones.
http://twitter.com/#!/sprint/status/28185122356338688
http://twitter.com/#!/sprint/status/28185273577775104
supercluver said:
http://twitter.com/#!/sprint/status/28185122356338688
http://twitter.com/#!/sprint/status/28185273577775104
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is when Samsung and Sprint say ASAP it really just means "Another Sorry A$$ Promise."
I'm sorry everyone. I am the reason why we don't have Froyo yet. Let me explain. Every other smart phone I have ever had in the past 5 years on Sprint was an HTC phone. I went through 3 or 4 Moguls, 2 Touch Pros, and 3 Touch Pro 2s. I thought that since I had so any issues with HTC hardware I would try a different manufacturer so I got the Epic. Well.... It looks like the black cloud has followed me! Anyone want to pony up and buy me an iPhone? LOL I'd love to take this black cloud over there!
Well it is nice to hear Samsung open up and say something, but I sure am getting tired of getting the "details will come soon" BS from both Samsung and Sprint. We've been hearing "details will come soon" for more than 4 months. Perhaps we have different definitions of the word "soon."
DiGi760 said:
Well it is nice to hear Samsung open up and say something, but I sure am getting tired of getting the "details will come soon" BS from both Samsung and Sprint. We've been hearing "details will come soon" for more than 4 months. Perhaps we have different definitions of the word "soon."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think with another other carrier releasing the 2.2 update for a SGS phone, it will put pressure on other carriers to follow. No longer can they say it's someone else's fault.
But honestly, I bet we'll see noobnl release an operational version of Gingerbread before we see Sprint push 2.2 out.
Seriously. Everytime I open up my xda app all I see is Ginger this Ginger that..for every phone but ours. Who else is gets annoyed by this? I know it makes me cringe everytime!
Of course no blame goes to our devs who are fantastic. I applaud them for doing what they have done with Sammy's seemingly awful coding (good luck Kaos!) Wish they spent as much time and money on their software as they do on hardware! (which consequently is brilliant!)
End late night rant.
Sent from my fascination with voodoo
I know it sucks! But by the sounds of it we might get Froyo tomorrow...Not getting my hopes up. I wish Samsung/VZW would update the fascinate from 2.1 to 2.3.3
I don't mind honestly... Just more of a reason for me to get an iPhone
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
I have to ask honestly and flame if you must, when you buy a phone with eclair, should you not assume you will never get anything else? Were you given a contract by verizon or samsung stating if you bought a specific phone, it was guaranteed to be further upgraded?
Just my 2 cents.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
^^^^^^
good day.
Legato525 said:
I have to ask honestly and flame if you must, when you buy a phone with eclair, should you not assume you will never get anything else? Were you given a contract by verizon or samsung stating if you bought a specific phone, it was guaranteed to be further upgraded?
Just my 2 cents.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we were told we would get the froyo in a couple of months but now almost a year has passed.
It doesn't help the fact that international sgs just got the official gingerbread.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Complain to Verizon and Samsung if you have an issue. Complaining here isn't going to get anything accomplished.
Nope, it sure isn't. Remember...I am always watching....
Legato525 said:
I have to ask honestly and flame if you must, when you buy a phone with eclair, should you not assume you will never get anything else? Were you given a contract by verizon or samsung stating if you bought a specific phone, it was guaranteed to be further upgraded?
Just my 2 cents.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate this kind of response.
When I buy a phone, upgrades and updates are part of my buying decision. They're probably part of yours too. If there's a phone with a 900mhz processor and locked to 2.1, and an identical phone but with an 800mhz processor that will be supported for years, I will choose the latter. Whether you like it or not, when the operating system updates this quickly, updates are a feature.
Sent from my Fascinate
Electrodeath0 said:
I hate this kind of response.
When I buy a phone, upgrades and updates are part of my buying decision. They're probably part of yours too. If there's a phone with a 900mhz processor and locked to 2.1, and an identical phone but with an 800mhz processor that will be supported for years, I will choose the latter. Whether you like it or not, when the operating system updates this quickly, updates are a feature.
Sent from my Fascinate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the point here is that there never is any promise or guarantee of that support and I'm sorry but a sales person's word is no indication by any means. When we buy our phones we buy them as they are. To gripe about Samsung or Verizon's lack of promptness is ignorant and really annoying after seeing it so much. Normally you can trust the talented developers here to do better work anyway. The best approach is to wait patiently and support them in anyway you can whether it be logcats or donations.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Legato525 said:
I have to ask honestly and flame if you must, when you buy a phone with eclair, should you not assume you will never get anything else? Were you given a contract by verizon or samsung stating if you bought a specific phone, it was guaranteed to be further upgraded?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my first Android phone (I'd previously been on an old dumb phone made by Samsung, and it'd been reliable the for all the years), and the reps said that Froyo was coming 'soon', and Samsung had already began rolling Froyo out for the Samsung Galaxy S in Europe a few weeks before- I figured it'd be at most a few weeks, not realizing that 'Galaxy S' did not include any of the phones sold in the US!
I was also fooled about the quality of the GPS, when I was first testing it out, I always thought it locked instantly, because I was always around wifi (and Google's Location services have wifi routers geolocated down fairly well). And when I wasn't around WiFi, I saw the big blue circle and assumed that was the GPS just slowly loading, not Verizon's cellular triangulation doing all the work while the GPS was just robbing my battery and doing nothing with it.
At the time, I was hesitant to go with Android. I knew that the devices were generally fairly low quality, while getting slow updates... but the iPhone hadn't been announced on Verizon, and I wanted to do application development, which is massively cheaper to get into on Android than the iPhone ($25 vs $100 + a mac).
Next device will be from a reputable manufacturer, I've learned my lesson.
I know what phone I bought. Thanks for your concern though. Also our phone actually was guaranteed to be further upgraded quite sometime ago.
imnuts said:
Complain to Verizon and Samsung if you have an issue. Complaining here isn't going to get anything accomplished.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not complaining at all, in fact I don't see one word in the OP that looks like a complaint. Just asking a simple question if other people cry a bit inside when they see gingerbread in the "latest" category all the time.. excluding our phone.
As previously stated, for the sake of amazing devs I wish Samsung didn't code things like imbeciles.
Sent from my fascination with voodoo
zskate311 said:
As previously stated, for the sake of amazing devs I wish Samsung didn't code things like imbeciles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think there's anyone who would disagree with this. It's honestly disappointing how much more talented the devs seem to be when compared to Samsung's team. Good for the devs but you'd think a multi-billion dollar company could hire some better programmers.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
We are finally getting sources for froyo, and now you are already complaining that we don't have gingerbread???
Sheesh.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
zskate311 said:
Also our phone actually was guaranteed to be further upgraded quite sometime ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is this "guarantee"?
And like many have said before, sales reps, service reps, and tech reps don't count. They are only trying to sell you a phone and a contract, or placate you with the current setup you already have.
Neither Samsung nor Verizon have officially said the Fascinate will be upgraded.
I'm not complaining about not having gingerbread. Like i said earlier its just annoying seeing it all over the place when opening up my XDA premium app.
(please don't respond to this with a childish comment saying "well don't use your XDA app then dohh") we arent 5 y.o. here
Kevin Gossett said:
Where is this "guarantee"?
And like many have said before, sales reps, service reps, and tech reps don't count. They are only trying to sell you a phone and a contract, or placate you with the current setup you already have.
Neither Samsung nor Verizon have officially said the Fascinate will be upgraded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simple google search proves my point. If you want a direct quote i guess i can search more, but for me this suffices.
http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=16730&news=Google+Android+OS+2.2+Samsung+Galaxy+S+Epic+4G+Vibrant+Fascinate+Froyo
zskate311 said:
I'm not complaining about not having gingerbread. Like i said earlier its just annoying seeing it all over the place when opening up my XDA premium app.
(please don't respond to this with a childish comment saying "well don't use your XDA app then dohh") we arent 5 y.o. here
simple google search proves my point. If you want a direct quote i guess i can search more, but for me this suffices.
http://www.brighthand.com/default.a...sung+Galaxy+S+Epic+4G+Vibrant+Fascinate+Froyo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That article is almost a year old. Therefore it proves nothing other than hurting your argument rather than helping it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Electrodeath0 said:
I hate this kind of response.
When I buy a phone, upgrades and updates are part of my buying decision. They're probably part of yours too. If there's a phone with a 900mhz processor and locked to 2.1, and an identical phone but with an 800mhz processor that will be supported for years, I will choose the latter. Whether you like it or not, when the operating system updates this quickly, updates are a feature.
Sent from my Fascinate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you, but my point to the OP is, did anyone tell you the fascinate would get 2.3? I agree that they had a press release when the phone released about 2.2, but I have not heard anyone at samsung say anything about a fascinate getting 2.3. Would it be nice, ya. But does samsung have some moral resposibility to make non critical updates to the phone? No. I will never argue the froyo point, I was speaking in generalities.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA App
I think you accidentally a word
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
times_infinity said:
That article is almost a year old. Therefore it proves nothing other than hurting your argument rather than helping it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does this hurt my point? No matter how old an article is a promise is a promise. And I'm sorry I didn't spend the time to find an article with a more acceptable time table.
Also in regards to gingerbread, Sammy did say that the "entire" galaxy line would be updated to android 2.3
I can find that article as well if you really need it
Sent from my fascination with voodoo
MobileCrunch: Samsung To Announce... Something On May 24th - http://tinyurl.com/3harubo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
zanderman112 said:
MobileCrunch: Samsung To Announce... Something On May 24th - http://tinyurl.com/3harubo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw this yesterday. I actually think it is the new Galaxy Tablets...but no one believes me lol. We will see
Whosdaman said:
I saw this yesterday. I actually think it is the new Galaxy Tablets...but no one believes me lol. We will see
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i believe you
EDIT: 10.1" or 8.9"?
steviee7 said:
i believe you
EDIT: 10.1" or 8.9"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both, I would assume Samsung would launch them together so not to take away sales from the other.
Whosdaman said:
Both, I would assume Samsung would launch them together so not to take away sales from the other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah. I completely forgot about those lol. Always possible.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Oooo nice, same bat time same bat channel we'll be tuned in.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Let's just hope they don't gimp the wifi versions like they supposedly did with the first galaxy tab. Just saw the engadget article a few days ago. I don't think Samsung had any reply/update, wouldn't necessarily surprise me... still, I'm not bitter, just hopeful for cool new gadgets, no bootloaders locked, underclocked, or otherwise gimped devices
Sent from my pocket rocket
SGS2 for at&t, verizon AND SPRINT!!!
I found this on pocketnow, looks like we'll be seeing a slab in a similar design on the big 3 carriers, according to pocketnow.
Quote;
As we suspected in late March, it appears as if Samsung will be bringing the Galaxy S II stateside under the brand names Attain, Function, and Within. According to an item description posted by etailer Wireless Xcessories Group, AT&T will supposedly get the Samsung Galaxy S 2 Attain, Verizon the Samsung Galaxy S 2 Function, and Sprint the Samsung Galaxy S 2 Within. Notably, T-Mobile is not on this list, suggesting that it will either not get the handset altogether, or carry a modified version -- as Sprint does with the QWERTY-equipped Epic 4G.
Also of note here, assuming that this page is accurate, is the fact that the case being advertised is model-specific, suggesting that all three of these variants will look very similar to one another and probably to the international Galaxy S 2 as well. That would be quite different from the original Galaxy S, which differed quite a bit on each domestic carrier, and probably speaks to a shift in the balance of power between Samsung and the network operators following the success of the first model.
Link---http://m.pocketnow.com/android/galaxy-s-2-us-carrier-branding-confirmed
I read that article as well. The only change I hope they make is having all capacitive buttons instead of the physical button in the middle, not that it would stop me from buying this beast of a phone.
sctwinslow said:
I read that article as well. The only change I hope they make is having all capacitive buttons instead of the physical button in the middle, not that it would stop me from buying this beast of a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, personally I prefer less iphoney look, but my main concern would be sprint/samsung offering me some kind of early upgrade, otherwise I'll be forced to pass.
On another note tho, it would be crazy if this plays out to be true and mr.T-mobile gets the epic4Gx2 or whatever they call it. If that happens I can honestly say, I didn't see that coming.
I sure hope the announcement is for the Galaxy S2!!!
My step-daughter wants a phone,a nd I would get to give her my Epic and get the S2, as long as the release date is not to far off
DCRocks said:
I sure hope the announcement is for the Galaxy S2!!!
My step-daughter wants a phone,a nd I would get to give her my Epic and get the S2, as long as the release date is not to far off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my upgrade is in August, so assuming there isn't anything way nicer on the horizon then, I'll be getting this.
Yay for GSII! I kinda like that name, The Samsung Within.
[sig]Typed by a man standing on a toilet, eating a bacon sammich.[sig]
zanderman112 said:
Yay for GSII! I kinda like that name, The Samsung Within.
[sig]Typed by a man standing on a toilet, eating a bacon sammich.[sig]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, that makes more sense after seeing your post, wimax 4G/ sgs2=thin....merged= wiTHIN
I see now engadget has it and I noticed this case in question says it has an opening in the back for the kickstand. Now I don't believe we heard anything about the international sgs2 as having a kickstand.
So The carriers have there names trademarked for the new gs2 in the us. SAD NEWS ---T-Mobile USA is notable for its absence; that could be because the carrier isn’t getting a version or, perhaps more likely, because aesthetically it is different and the gel wouldn’t fit.
heres the article:
http://androidcommunity.com/us-gala...function-and-sprint-within-20110516/#bXpulseX
What do u guys think of the new names and wht do u think of no tmobil sg2 name???
That's weird that we aren't getting a name. Im sure we'll get one though.
Sent from my SGH-T959
Those names suck! T mobile is probably thinking of a better name or they are waiting for their watered down device to get done! Because you know T-Mobile always has to take something out so they can introduce a new device 4 months later!
Runnin Bionix 2! Yeeee!
yah but werent we first last yr to launch and have it named?
Crossing my fingers for the same model as international just with AWS bands added.
movieaddict said:
yah but werent we first last yr to launch and have it named?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We were dead last to be named, but first to be released, so I guess that's what's happening here. We are probably getting one that looks exactly like the i9100, just they haven't come up with a good name for it.
Sent from my SGH-T959
The names, they are just terrible.
Just call it the Vibrant 2, seriuosly is it that hard.
Sent from my CM7 Powered Vibrant
Or, it could be missing because of the pending AT&T merger... doubtful, but just throwing it out there.
i also heard "there isn’t a T-Mobile name because Samsung is expecting that AT&T will have purchased them by release date…
T-Mobiles SGS2 will be the Samsung Inferior <-- Sounds better than all 3 other names doesn't it. Sad but true
That sucks if Samsung isn't giving us a Variant because of the merger. HTC is still giving us phones(Sensation). Boo on Samsung if they are doing this.
EDIT: I will never buy a Samsung phone, no matter how good, again.
Sent from my SGH-T959
Yeah, was not trying to imply I knew that was the reason (merger), just speculation.
tKoHaXoR, how do you know the name?
s15274n said:
Or, it could be missing because of the pending AT&T merger... doubtful, but just throwing it out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was my thought, too. Maybe TMo just figures it's only going to have the phone for six months before it becomes part of AT&T, anyway, so why carry it?
s15274n said:
Yeah, was not trying to imply I knew that was the reason (merger), just speculation.
tKoHaXoR, how do you know the name?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey now, easy with that logical thinking, you know how that goes around here.
And, I think the quoted name was a joke, Samsung Inferior, fitting, but a joke I am sure.
Sent from my ZenDroid, meditating on the XDA App
nice to see an update for states side but those names are horrid.
I thought the merger didn't passed?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
s15274n said:
Yeah, was not trying to imply I knew that was the reason (merger), just speculation.
tKoHaXoR, how do you know the name?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was a joke I think lol
[RANT]
This is horrible news. Samsung has to (yet again) cater to the unstandardized U.S. carriers. Just look at what happened to the Vibrant (correct me if I miss a few details):
Front-facing camera removed
FM radio removed
LED flash removed
Added a key with a search function that's useless most of the time
Added T-Mobile's crapware along with a unique Android source which delays official updates
I'm pretty sure similar things will happen with the Galaxy S II variants for the U.S. this time.
[/RANT]
Oh, and those names are terrible.
Xan_Kriegor said:
[RANT]
This is horrible news. Samsung has to (yet again) cater to the unstandardized U.S. carriers. Just look at what happened to the Vibrant (correct me if I miss a few details):
Front-facing camera removed
FM radio removed
LED flash removed
Added a key with a search function that's useless most of the time
Added T-Mobile's crapware along with a unique Android source which delays official updates
I'm pretty sure similar things will happen with the Galaxy S II variants for the U.S. this time.
[/RANT]
Oh, and those names are terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The I9000 didn't have an led flash. It was added to the epic, mesmerize and fascinate
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App