Database Users

Apple sues samsung

Why am I not surprised? http://tinyurl.com/4y2zogh Do you agree with apple?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App

No. I'll bet the tires on my car look substantially like the tires on Steve Jobs' car. Is Michelin going to sue Goodyear?

Apple ya pricks!!!!!!!

Although I did say to someone in september that the galaxy s looks like the iphone in terms of touchwiz
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App

I believe Apple is full of them selves. There is enough difference for even a moran to see.

That's the usual dirty trick Apple uses for trying to "exterminate" the potential real competitors!

evil_fish said:
That's the usual dirty trick Apple uses for trying to "exterminate" the potential real competitors!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, when think about it. I want to rephase "apple" as "big companies"

The thing is there are some inventions that can only be designed one way. If apple sues samsung then palm should sue apple since the apple iphone is very close to the palm life drive.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App

Apple is suing everyone.. Amazon for the "app store' name, HTC, Motorola, and other companies for the 'swipe to do something' feature.. it's just a never ending story.

it sure took Apple a long time to notice the similarities between their products and Samsung's...or any other phone manufacturer for that matter. A dinner plate is like the moon if you point out enough common properties.
Apple: "Oh my god you copied the iPad and made it smaller, put cameras on it, and an sd card slot too?! shame on you! (...hey that camera idea is not bad..lets put them on the iPad2...)"

i can understand that they would see a imitation of the iPhone 3gs through the galaxy s.
but seriously, they are still selling iPhones like no other company is selling.
and their newest model, the iPhone 4 looks completely different.
and to say that Samsung is imitating the look and feel of the ipad with the galaxy tab is completely ridiculous.
they seem like small children,
this is my ball
no its my mine
give it to me
no
muuuuuuuum
XD

Tab and iPad..... white backs so they must be identical!!!!
Apple are going to sue me because I copied their designs.... my bathroom is exactly the same as an iPad..... white!!!

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Reminds me of the Rolf Harris song ~ "Two little Boys had two little Toys".

Someone should go talk to the boys @ Xerox and see what they have to say about Apple and Intellectual Property..
...and on a side note, exactly how many different ways can you make a tablet and not have it be flat and rectangular with smooth edges ???

Fine until Samsung stops supplying parts to apple
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App

Seems like this will see the end of rectangle devices with curved edged and devices with a black frame around the screen that are the same width.
I don't get why Apple don't just sue every manufacturer. It'll save them time as they're going at them one by one.
Its just such BS. Ill put a turtleneck jumper on my c0#k and sue Steve Jobs for stealing my idea.
Sent via zombie infested Gingerbread.

All good points above. But understand this is the way of corporate America.
I am part owner of a company that imports musical instruments to the US. Specifically guitars.
I cannot tell you how many times I have received letters from Fender, Gibson, Taylor attorneys. NONE of my guitars are marked with these names, some of them do look similar.
But as has been said above, how many different guitar designs can there be? Made of wood, with a neck, 6 strings???
We have always replied stating that we do not use the name or photograph of THEIR product to sell ours. We have only once been sued by a guitar manufacturer for intellectual property rights violations. We fought, we won. But it cost us nearly $50k.
These corporations HAVE to do this. They have to draw a line in the sand and not allow others to infringe. Because at the point they no longer do that, they open themselves to ALOT of lost revenue.

I'll just leave this right here...

Found this article on www.cnn.com and kinda makes sence. I would love though to see samsung counter sue apple though imagine the amount of money they would get from iphone sales LOL.
but here is the article
http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-real-reason-apple-is-suing-samsung-2011-4

http://www.zweipunktnull.org/blog/2...-und-wann-schaltet-sich-eigentlich-braun-ein/ <- great article but in German (but there are a lot of comparison pics)
it shows how Apple was inspired by (stole) the Design of the famous German Designer Dieter Rams of the Braun Company.

The Truth about Apple iPhone and the lawsuit against Samsung

LOL
Look on this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

That's too funny. I hope this blows up in their face and they have to get a new supplier for their components. Take out the samsung, take out the magic.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

hansonator said:
That's too funny. I hope this blows up in their face and they have to get a new supplier for their components. Take out the samsung, take out the magic.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YES!!! Now I have a reason to laugh about all the ass-clowns who said: I odn;t like that samsung made an Iphone-like phone). the truth is that they reinvented themselves, but the baby-apple thinks it;s the center of the universe, that whatever they do is unique, and no one should even try to do something like them, because they will sue him.
LOL apple =))

LG's Prada phone before that!

Completely fasle! Quick check at GSMArena proves otherwise.

baudfather said:
Completely fasle! Quick check at GSMArena proves otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats false? A quick check at GSMArena proved the court case.

baudfather said:
Completely fasle! Quick check at GSMArena proves otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn crApple bot, as usual it makes no sense.

baudfather said:
Completely fasle! Quick check at GSMArena proves otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just check both phones release dates on google... You Completely wrong...

I'm not an Apple fanboy, in fact quite the opposite. But the facts of this post are wrong. F700 was announced in Feb 2007 and showcased at 2007 CEBIT NOT 2006 show. And it was accused of being an iphone ripoff even back then.

Feb 8th 2007 date of video upload.
And if we want to be pedantic here.
The first touchscreen phone was the IBM Simon, launched in 1992. During this decade the popular iPaq (not made by Apple by the way) was launched with touchscreens and optional phone attachments. HTC, the leader in touchscreen phones up until the iPhone and makers of phones like the Nexus One launched their first touchscreen phone, the HTC Wallaby aka XDA in 2002.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

In my opinion, the problem is that Apple is kind of feared. Android is being developed and, according to Google News, 350,000 Android terminals are activate every day, and this is a commercial strategy to stop Android's development.
Although, if I am not wrong, Samsung and Apple work "together" in a certain sense, because Samsung provides hardware for Apple products... So I can't get the reason of this lawsuit against Samsung. It is probably a commercial thing - Apple will "earn" MUCH money with this.

aureum said:
Just check both phones release dates on google... You Completely wrong...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps you can find an accurate record of any announcement date for the F700 prior to Feb 2007.

nop

I can't believe Apple is scared over Samsung.. This only means one thing, Apple was already been surpassed by Samsung.. This issue is way back 4 years ago and got sued. LOL

I hope that Samsung will hire some designers after that.

apple sucks from top to bottom!!
All apple can do is take ppl to court coz they are scared like lil chickens lol

Nokia vs. Apple and everyone
I'm just looking forward to the case of Nokia vs. everyone for using icons and menues on a phone!
Note: Not that I'm claiming that Nokia was first here at all!

deadey3 said:
apple sucks from top to bottom!!
All apple can do is take ppl to court coz they are scared like lil chickens lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I said

so apple iphone is basically made from samsung and lg parts ??
and the iphone is so 'unique' ???
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
wankers !!!

azzledazzle said:
so apple iphone is basically made from samsung and lg parts ??
and the iphone is so 'unique' ???
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
wankers !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't you know?? They give the definition of "unique" to a phone which has Samsung and LG components... And they're complaining for something which is not fair to complain for. TouchWiz UI and iOS UI are similar for the drawer and the app bar, and so what? I mean, that's a minor problem: imagine if those companies who are providing components for Apple stop doing it... I think giving them a "license" to use a (let's call it like that) similar interface is a good strategy...

Android R.I.P. - The Grips of Jobs' Dead Hands

Android, and every other touchscreen OS, (besides iOS) you might as well say goodbye to... I HOPE NOT!
Apple now has the power to destroy Android, Windows Phone, and any other iOS Touchscreen Competitor... Steve Jobs wins this round (for now anyways...)
How long before Apple has the S3 Pulled? This is the top iPhone competitor besides the DROID RAZR Series, with the S3 far ahead...
Check this out:
http://www.acsyndicate.net/apple-aw...ts-the-possible-end-of-android-as-we-know-it/
This could spell the end for Android and this phone, and I will not be a happy camper if I can't upgrade because of Apple... I will throw a major tantrum!
Google, act & appeal fast and fix this mess!!!!
Comments, Thoughts, Last Wishes?
I am not saying this will happen, but is quite possible if the government doesn't block Apple in their tracks from doing so... (I think once Google Appeals, these parents will be made standard for touchscreens...)

The one saving grace is that it's pretty clear the current patent system that dates back to George Washington in 1790 is clearly broken as it applies to technology. Should Apple start abusing their horde of patents to eliminate competition leaving them as the only purveyor of functioning smartphones and tablets governments worldwide will intervene. It's already started with Judge Posner throwing out the Apple v. Motorola case in Chicago with prejudice calling it "ridiculous" based on lack of or concocted damages. If Apple wins the Samsung case in California they'll lose anyway. It'll be the beginning of a massive move toward patent reform because in a democratic society you don't let one manufacturer control an entire industry whether their patents entitle them to or not.

Patent reform needed...

Old news, a repost and a lot of misleading and wrong information. Good job trying to direct traffic to your site thought, you could have just asked.

Do any of Google's newly acquired patents from Moto have any teeth against Apple?

IBM Simon

GGSunny12 said:
IBM Simon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sony Magic Link
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

This is a bit scary but I don't think it would hold up. Any judge would be stupid to let this be abused.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5

GGSunny12 said:
IBM Simon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sunny *-*
Hahaha
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

International patents? No. Wouldn't worry unless the US succeeds with there Anglo/American Corporate Fascist NWO.
Does nothing but makes Apple look bad and the US.
Sick of the US fear movement, move along! Nothing to worry about but more madness from the madhouse. Civil war again soon so enjoy the continuing mad stage show of Barry Soetoro the Manchurian CIA sock puppet of the 0.001 percent Lastly, Apple isn't that far up the US gov ass. It avoids paying a **** load of tax. That's a positive for Google. Also forgetting Google is like FB, it's sponsored by intelligence. The government isn't going to ban all these spy tools snooping for them!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

How exactly does Apple have patents for things they didn't invent? Oh, wait, I remember now, theft.
I'm not sure that Apple CAN be granted patents for technology that already existed - smartphones have been around far longer than the iPhone, despite what the Apple folks would have us believe and I had phones that were doing these sorts of things long before Apple came along.
The law may be an ass, but I don't think it's a complete tool.

deedscreen said:
Android, and every other touchscreen OS, (besides iOS) you might as well say goodbye to... I HOPE NOT!
Apple now has the power to destroy Android, Windows Phone, and any other iOS Touchscreen Competitor... Steve Jobs wins this round (for now anyways...)
How long before Apple has the S3 Pulled? This is the top iPhone competitor besides the DROID RAZR Series, with the S3 far ahead...
Check this out:
http://www.acsyndicate.net/apple-aw...ts-the-possible-end-of-android-as-we-know-it/
This could spell the end for Android and this phone, and I will not be a happy camper if I can't upgrade because of Apple... I will throw a major tantrum!
Google, act & appeal fast and fix this mess!!!!
Comments, Thoughts, Last Wishes?
I am not saying this will happen, but is quite possible if the government doesn't block Apple in their tracks from doing so... (I think once Google Appeals, these parents will be made standard for touchscreens...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Old and wrong news buddy. Get a life man.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Sony Ericsson p900 was released 2003 way before any iPhone.....it had a touch screen..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Steve Jobs, where is his grave? I think it would be a popular place for Android users to visit, so we can piss on it
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Closed, this has been discussed to death, and its more of an android thing rather than a sgs3 thing, so wrong section as well.

Apple vs Samsung. Apple awarded 1 Billion plus for patent infringement

http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/24/apple-v-samsung-decision/
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/24/tech/mobile/apple-samsung-verdict/index.html
Such crap.

I'm bugging over this big time. I even ranted about it on twitter and on facebook. Samsung has to pay $1.05 billion to Apple and Apple isn't guilty of jack? This is some BS. It's like what another Spaniard tweeted:
"If Apple made cars, it'd be the only one that can make them with four wheels, rearview mirrors and a steering wheel"

By the time the appeals process is completed it will probably be much less, possibly even nothing. Court cases aren't over this fast.

Well, Samsung isn't really innocent, when you take a look at the Galaxy S and S2 you will see that it's very similar to the iPhone 3/3GS and the iPhone 4. If 1.05 Billion dollar are really justified is something else but I think Samsung just gets what it deserves.

The iPhone is a touchscreen and a button. There isn't anything to copy. You can't just patent essential elements to something. That would be like if Ford sued every car that had four wheels and a steering wheel.

F#%& apple even more. Samsung all the way
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app

There goes innovation. Wth happened to antitrust laws? The verdict today totally goes against antitrust. Way to support monopoly today.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium

Then I'd say you take a look at all the other OEMs like Sony, Nokia ect. Their devices look very different from the iPhone and they are accused of copying the design of the iPhone. I really can't understand why there are people who refuse to admit that Samsung took a very close look at the iPhone when they were designing the Galaxy S and S2.

I don't know about you guys but I'm looking forward to speaker-less, circular Nexus phones in the future! Innovation FTW!!!

Wow everything apple said in the statement was complete and utter lies.. Apple thrives on originality and innovation? I since when did apple innovate? They copied the cell phone, computer and everything in between... Very sad for Samsung indeed
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

[email protected] said:
There goes innovation. Wth happened to antitrust laws? The verdict today totally goes against antitrust. Way to support monopoly today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does that potentially make it a "monapplely"

Samsung didn't take the case seriously.
Apple only has their "image" and "aesthetics" which define them as a company. Of course they would come to court about Image and likeness patents with everything in their bags.
I didn't buy my phone cause it looked like an apple product and design elements that made it act like an apple product. I bought it cause is WASN'T an Apple product.
People don't buy a Samsung tablet because they "though it was an iPad" they buy it cause they don't want an iPad.
I always though the obligatory apple logo and the silly cases with the hole in it to show the logo was the distinguishing feature of iCrap.

mactheburger said:
People don't buy a Samsung tablet because they "though it was an iPad" they buy it cause they don't want an iPad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's really funny because apple was saying that so many people were complaining about samsungs tablet because they thought it was an Ipad and they were saying it was ****.
if anyone is that stupid to buy a samsung tablet and get it mixed for an ipad then they have to be working for apple. Evidently if someone thinks a samsung tablet is an ipad it will be someone working for them because they want to make a case for every patent. "ITS A RECTANGLE WITH ROUNDED EDGES" "ITS A TOUCH SCREEN" "IT'S 10"" "IT'S BETTER THEN OURS AND WERE JUST MAKING EXCUSES"
****ing apple, cry me a river, we all know apples aren't loved by everyone, and besides, what would this world be like if we didn't have oranges and peaches and such?

Firetime123 said:
Then I'd say you take a look at all the other OEMs like Sony, Nokia ect. Their devices look very different from the iPhone and they are accused of copying the design of the iPhone. I really can't understand why there are people who refuse to admit that Samsung took a very close look at the iPhone when they were designing the Galaxy S and S2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Puleese. the Galaxy S2 looks nothing like the iphone 4. And even if you think Samsung deserves some punishment, you can't justify somethign as retarded as ALL of those phones infringing. I mean like all of them including the Nexus S 4g and a phone with a Qwerty keyboard.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
you tell me where these 2 phones look the same? samsung is bigger, slimmer and is made of plastic and the home button on it is a rectangle not a circle. Is this an imitation of the iphone 4s? hell naw, it's just a phone thats black, is a touch screen and has a button on it... I don't even realize how apple justified their case. The jury must of been a bunch of retards, they shouldve based their judgement off of common sense and not the patent law

imho, Samsung is the real copycat...copying the design of both hardware and software, even to the things like dock connector and store concept. this is good, a slap in the face for any copycat lurking around, forcing everyone to come up with even better designs like how Nokia did
the only thing i feel original about Samsung is the Nexus series.

The outcome to the trial was not surprising at all. Samsung did violate Apple's patents. But Apple should have never been granted those patents in the first place. Bounce back when scrolling to the end of a menu. What type of BS is it that that is a patentable invention. The only way I can see that Samsung violated that patent is if Apple provided that Samsung ripped the code straight from iOS source code and used it line for line in their UI. Otherwise Apple basically has a patent covering the idea of a particular UI element.
We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good artists copy; great artists steal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know what those are? Steve Jobs favorite quotes. Enough said
When it comes to software patents the patent system is a joke. And its not just Apple. How can Amazon have a patent for one click checkout. On its own that is an idea and abstract concept. The only thing that should be patentable about that is the underlying code. If someone comes along and makes another one click checkout system but the underlying source code and software methods are different, how can that be infringement? I just wish Google would play a more active role in defending its android partners from Apple. They should be able to destroy apple on a search patent, right? Google is search so the patent office must have granted them the patent for "method and apparatus for searching"

Apple has always been like this only but those retards cant seem to work a way out to give a proper balance of hardware and software at a good price , so whats better way to reap your losses over some other company's profit . The kind of patents they have been filing its like 2+2=4 but 3+1=4 cant be put . Yes copying source code would be different case but that's not the thing here.

lost all respect for apple, will never ever buy an apple product again in my life
---------- Post added at 03:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:21 PM ----------
Apple copied drop down notifications dint they ? Sue them back Samsung

rrohanjs said:
Apple copied drop down notifications dint they ? Sue them back Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can't because they didn't file a patent for it. Maybe they should...or not, don't stoop down to Apple's level: Filing patents for such general things such as shape of a device. Sheeesh
Sent from my Nexus S

Apple Says Samsung’s Galaxy Note, Jelly Bean Infringe Patent

Whining baby doesn't have anything but to complain all the time..
Reference - mobile.businessweek.com/news/2012-11-06/apple-says-samsung-s-galaxy-note-jelly-bean-infringe-patents
www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tec...tab-10-1-android-4-1-infringe-patents-1110619

Based on their claims of design this is the only thing that doesn't violate one or more of their patents...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Really funny how it's only Samsung and Samsung made devices that are on the hit list so far....
Though if they drag google into it then ALL android devices will be affected... Will be funny to see how this will pan out as before it was Apple (America - LA) vs Samsung (Korea) and Apple won, now it will be Apple vs Google (both America based) and that might be a fairer match...

Apples litigation only alienates consumers. I for one will never purchase another product from them no matter how good it is.
They should try competing with products instead of competing in the court room.

I mean after sometime you just lose respect - they are in news for these court cases lately. If they had put this much energy in improving their own product(s), they wouldn't have to fall back on "retina" every time a new (really ?) product was released..

Apple says everything. Whine, whine, whine...

ultramag69 said:
Really funny how it's only Samsung and Samsung made devices that are on the hit list so far....
Though if they drag google into it then ALL android devices will be affected... Will be funny to see how this will pan out as before it was Apple (America - LA) vs Samsung (Korea) and Apple won, now it will be Apple vs Google (both America based) and that might be a fairer match...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was motorola apple started on first, but they **** themselves and started on samsung after google bought them lol
Sent from my GT-N8010 using Tapatalk 2

Apple: if you can't innovate, litigate.

Yes Apple feel Samsung is catching up and also overtaking them in innovations in cell phones so they are taking the easy way out they already were embarresed by a UK court and their appeals are not in good shape in US also with bans lifted on Tab so I think they are going insane.

I never used to dislike Apple so much, but every time they pull out another lawsuit it just makes me want to convert everyone to Android.

Hest88 said:
I never used to dislike Apple so much, but every time they pull out another lawsuit it just makes me want to convert everyone to Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

relldroid said:
+1
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 again.
I think Apple are feeling threatened. 30 million SG3's sold. Several million Note 1 and 2's sold.
Trouble is, it makes people curious about Samsung products. I know several people that used to be Apple fans that are now Android owners, more to the point SG3 owners.
Sent from my GT-N8010

Good advertising for Samsung and Apple just look like little *****es who go running to the courts everytime a bigger better toy is released....
I mean, they pretty much, in their last court case, said that Samsung is the same as them just cheaper... I too know a few people who shifted to Android because of the attention Apple put on Samsung products...

Hest88 said:
I never used to dislike Apple so much, but every time they pull out another lawsuit it just makes me want to convert everyone to Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've converted 4 apple users to android and hopefully they can convert some more.
Girlfriend was reluctant but a hand me down gs2 from me did the trick. She on the gs3 now and iPhone 4 is a distant memory.

Well, as a matter of fact Android and Sammy-phones ARE better than Apple-CrAppel-Crap, and I am DEFINITELY NOT a tech-religious.
I had Motorola, I had Compaq iPaq, I had NOKIA with Symbian, I had HTC with WinCE, I have now Android, and when Win8 prooves to be fitting to my personal needs more than Android I will move on.
I had one iPad, and I put it away after 2 weeks since it prooved to be absolutely worthless for my personal needs in every respect starting with the stupid keyboard.
CrApple is not tech, it is religion, and we KNOW what misery most religions brought over the world in the past and now, and Apple is on his holy Jihad against rationality .......................

Apple is a wining kid who instead of fighting hard believes in loosing and crying over it and does not want to try again and win instead it believes in crying and wining over and over again

Watch out apple farmers everywhere.... You might be next....
Honestly, the way Apple's going you're going to have to pay $1 everytime you say Apple.... Bugger, might have given them a new idea... :silly::laugh:

English_Gentleman said:
+1 again.
I think Apple are feeling threatened. 30 million SG3's sold. Several million Note 1 and 2's sold.
Trouble is, it makes people curious about Samsung products. I know several people that used to be Apple fans that are now Android owners, more to the point SG3 owners.
Sent from my GT-N8010
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 too. That the way i feel. you dont know how much i hate apple.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

ultramag69 said:
Watch out apple farmers everywhere.... You might be next....
Honestly, the way Apple's going you're going to have to pay $1 everytime you say Apple.... Bugger, might have given them a new idea... :silly::laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk 2

Samsung should just man up and stop selling components to Apple.