Related
have you guys seen the windows7 port for hd2? my mouth is watering !!!
http://cotulla.pp.ru/leo/WP7S/IMAG0202.jpg
Seriously that dude is a beast!
Will I try it probably.... will I like playing with megablocks not sure.
it's a fake¿?
when i run on my phone y believe this
Oh man cotulla and fake... NO FREAKIN WAY!
cookzitall said:
have you guys seen the windows7 port for hd2? my mouth is watering !!!
http://cotulla.pp.ru/leo/WP7S/IMAG0202.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely like what I see... regardless, I think you missed the section where to post it!
That is not windows phone 7 or desktop windows 7 it is Windows embedded CE 7 - used mostly on industrial devices. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Embedded
Cotulla is really a very skillful guy. Everybody talks of android and ubuntu and I think embedded CE would be also a good OS to try on leo. it is similar to desktop Windows but can be used on small devices. bravo cotulla.
and we need Leo Windows Embedded CE section now!
No way it's a fake. cotulla wouldn't mess with us like that .That port is something I would be defiantly interested in. oman just think windows mobile, windows 7, and android . I would be singing anything thing your phone can do mine can do better!
WTF
i always liked him but.
cotulla and fake=nogo
first hspl then usb-host then android then usb-host now this.
that guy is good man
So this is what he has been working on? humm...
I was hoping for Windows Phone 7 or either a NAND for Android....
and why is this under "Index of /leo/WP7S"?
Definitely like what I see... regardless, I think you missed the section where to post it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres not embedded windows 7 section so i just posted it in development...
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/products/westandard/default.mspx
heres some info on embedded windows...i wonder if this will support voice data?
Why post this in the Android section when everyone is waiting for the DEVS to port NAND and this looks like a screenshot from a few months back. Getting peoples hopes up you are a GIMP
I couldnt do any of this so i cant complain.
Damn I hate screenshots if there is nothing to download
Jammie_1989 said:
Why post this in the Android section when everyone is waiting for the DEVS to port NAND and this looks like a screenshot from a few months back. Getting peoples hopes up you are a GIMP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
santa clause syndrome ?
also i hope it materializes so i can tri boot but im really concerned about the lack of apps for the platform
Originally Posted by Jammie_1989 View Post
Why post this in the Android section when everyone is waiting for the DEVS to port NAND and this looks like a screenshot from a few months back. Getting peoples hopes up you are a GIMP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
getting peoples hopes up for what exactly? first of all this is something i found n wanted to share...im so tired of all you idiots *****ing about NAND. Give it a rest NAND would set android back 5 steps as far as usability.. bc all new drivers need to be written. instead of being ignorant why dont we all just appreciate what we have...and secondly if cotulla or anyone had a release it will come directly from them not from some other member...so jammie_1989 and anyone else ...IF U HAVE NOTHING POSITIVE TO ADD THEN JUST KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT ..THANK U
Jammie_1989 said:
Why post this in the Android section when everyone is waiting for the DEVS to port NAND and this looks like a screenshot from a few months back. Getting peoples hopes up you are a GIMP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Total agree!
Its nice, but it has nothing to do with Andorid!
Remember where we are: HD2 Android Development!
regardless of the terrible placement of this thread...
that is impressive, and i'd actually believe it's possible. win7 embedded could probably be loaded on an sd card for the leo. so long as the most basic standard ms drivers work, it'd at least get to desktop. embedded 7 will completely ignore devices which haven't been preconfigured with a driver. just makes me wonder how much of the device functions after loading up embedded.
Hi
The Desire HD kernel source is available at http://developer.htc.com/
exelent
Wow momy, now that you have milk, give me the HD camera port.
Saaaweeet! Mdeejay should get a hold of this soon!
Yay! Does this mean that we will have a Camera on the Desire HD ROM soon?
C'mon devs, make us proud owners of HTC Desire HD2!!!
And darkstone
elgrego4 said:
And darkstone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so! He has been busy lately but im sure we will be impressed very soon by one of the amazing devs around here.
whoever fixes it first gets a cookie =D
Cerv3r said:
whoever fixes it first gets a cookie =D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a few donations!
Me so happy! Now, all i want for this Xmas is... that's right!
N A N D !!!
Great news. New challenges for the guys, my guess is that they will love this.
And we all love/appreciate the work they doing. It´s a Win - Win : )
Great news, and now Camera HD for HD2
Great, hopefully also help with the PPP issue
Big news for HD lovers as me and greats chance for our dear developers ... thanks to all developers for continuos support ...
Camera ?
NAND ?
That is a good news.
Now waiting.
Theoretically it should be not much more than finding the references to the HD camera sensor (S5K3H1GX) and make sure that the HD2 sensor (s5k3e2fx) is referenced there. The source for the HD2 sensor is available in the published kernel source. Now we only need a cook to do it.
first want to see that they have published whole kernel and not everything except the camera ( i know they are watching us ) and ofcourse they dont like it if we finish the build .
waiting patiently for the devs and hope they fix it soon
GL
ok, a noob question, but with this release can developers now make a ROM that can replace windows mobile on the device memory or does this just fix minor glitches like the camera? if this relese does NOT do this wht will it take for us to have a rom that no longer has to be used from the memory card? thanks in advance.
Veldmuus said:
first want to see that they have published whole kernel and not everything except the camera ( i know they are watching us ) and ofcourse they dont like it if we finish the build .
waiting patiently for the devs and hope they fix it soon
GL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera stuff seems in there allright. I already had a quick peek.
steve austin said:
ok, a noob question, but with this release can developers now make a ROM that can replace windows mobile on the device memory or does this just fix minor glitches like the camera? if this relese does NOT do this wht will it take for us to have a rom that no longer has to be used from the memory card? thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this will not enable the NAND procedure. Actually, what gain do you expect from that except faster booting? The current SD version is a bit slower on startup but changing and upgrading is a breeze compared to NAND and you can have multiple versions installed and even the option to boot WM if you really feel the urge. With a fast SD card I doubt that Android will run much faster in flash mem.
So if you really prefer Android in firmware you will have to wait until the chefs are ready cooking this version (which probably should happen in the next month or so)
MrDroopy said:
No, this will not enable the NAND procedure. Actually, what gain do you expect from that except faster booting? The current SD version is a bit slower on startup but changing and upgrading is a breeze compared to NAND and you can have multiple versions installed and even the option to boot WM if you really feel the urge. With a fast SD card I doubt that Android will run much faster in flash mem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not fully understand what is the difference between NAND and SD boot. Is it really the case that after the boot system is sitting in the NAND... or maybe simpler Yes/No question:
After the NAND boot system is in THE SAME STATE as after the SD boot. The ONLY difference is that I have Android folder on SD card? (YES/NO)
I could not find any similar poll and the curiosity is killing me. Please vote so that we can get a picture of how people are using their HD2/Leo. The options are:
I have not tried to run Android or Custom Windows Mobile ROMs and am using original Windows Mobile
I have managed to run Android or Custom Windows Mobile ROMs but prefer using original Windows Mobile
I have managed to run Android or Custom Windows Molile ROMs and I mostly use Custom Windows Mobile
I have managed to run Android or Custom Windows Molile ROMs and I mostly use Android
EDIT: I messed up the first poll option. It is to say "I have not tried...."
The idea is pretty good (been wondering myself for a while). However, don't you think that this is a little biased? I mean, it is in an Android Forum. Shouldn't it be moved to HD2 General Forum? Just a thought, anyways, good idea man!
Merry Xmas from Portugal
ei05035 said:
The idea is pretty good (been wondering myself for a while). However, don't you think that this is a little biased? I mean, it is in an Android Forum. Shouldn't it be moved to HD2 General Forum? Just a thought, anyways, good idea man!
Merry Xmas from Portugal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realised after I posted it, so I went and posted the following thread in the HD2eneral Forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=884780
Still, you are right. The answer will be biased. Oops.
ei05035 said:
The idea is pretty good (been wondering myself for a while). However, don't you think that this is a little biased? I mean, it is in an Android Forum. Shouldn't it be moved to HD2 General Forum? Just a thought, anyways, good idea man!
Merry Xmas from Portugal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't posting it in the general section biased too? I'm not sure if that many Android users still go there. I know I don't (never been a WinMo user though, so I don't have the old habit of going there).
It's probably best to take the averages of the results here and in HD2 general.
samizad said:
EDIT: I messed up the first poll option. It is to say "I have not tried...."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed.
Good post. . . . . WMO lacks a lot compared to the Robot.
Yh, its like having a new phone. Android is amazing and our devs are just.... there arnt words for how gd they r!!!
dharvey4651 said:
Fixed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks dharvey. You couldn't move this thread to the HD2 General forum, could you?
I'm heavy Android user (I own a G1 and I tried almost every possible ROM for it), but right now I'm in love with WM, it's all new for me .
Wow I never would have guessed 97%+ of Leo owners have tried an android build...
surprised with so much HD2-android users
thanks for the poll and merry christmas!
Convert
I have to say I was passionate about Windows and Touch Flo on the HD2.
But the great builds from the folks at XDA Devs coupled with the cool and cheap / free apps on the Android market convinced me to make the jump.
Desire HD is not Touch Flo, but it is close.
I never used a winmo on my hd2 directly after the buy i use android
Thanks to all developers, I'm proud to be an Android HD2 owner Also, I need to thank custom WinMo developers because without them running a stable Android build is very problematic and difficult. MERRY CHRISTAMS & HAPPY NEW YEAR.
anap40 said:
Wow I never would have guessed 97%+ of Leo owners have tried an android build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess that people who browse android forums, uses android
Btw i just got HD2 today, it's awesome phone. I'm running mostly android on it since i have only 4GB card. When i get 8GB one i will try ubuntu and anything else that is availble here.
Guilty as charged! I have been using Android on the HD2 since I figured out how to load custom winmo and android roms. Thanks to all the developers!
I am very sorry if this is not appropriate, but I strongly believe that cedesmith's Little Kernel bootloader should be part of our HD2 lifes and CHEFS should adopt it for their own gains. For those who are only interested.
If this is considered inappropriate, please remove this thread from your forum.
Six main reasons why i believe so:
1. three-command complete ROM flash in less than 2min using fastboot
testing becomes joy
2. operating system independent
no need to load "Windows"
3. no bootloader specific screen to interrupt booting unless you want it
doesnt feel nice
4. open source, can be edited and upgraded
XDA is what is all about
5. native android feel and look
this is what we have all been looking for
6. Ability to use ClockWork Recovery as well
for those who still prefer CWR.
********* PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD. NO NEED. REFER TO THE ORIGINAL THREAD FOR QUESTIONS ********************
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=901305
Thanks
I can't care less about the no reply in here message. Devs are aware of it and some of the added cLK to the support list and even the official kernel added the patches for it.
What I don't understand is why would you want for everyone to 'move' to cLK?
Cause you don't see the MAGLDR interface while booting? Is that really the reason?
For the fastboot option which most of the user don't know how to use it? (have you've seen how bright are some posts from all these threads?)
For all bugs it has with the PPP connection or with RMNET (I think the last one doesn't even work)?
Cause it's open source? I really can't care less if Cotulla will never release the source for it, thanks to his hard work (and all the others) I can still keep a two years old phone faster that a Galaxy S.
Cause it doesn't look like a Android phone while booting? Go buy a phone running Android natively since it's clear you don't understand that this is not a native Android phone.
Oh and what's that booting into Windows??! Really?! After all this time you still couldn't read that MAGLDR doesn't boot Windows before it loads?! And you bash it?!
As a final word... I remember cedesmith saying something like this: I got bored waiting for Cotulla to release MAGLDR so this is my 5 days work (or something very close, 1 week top) to run Android natively on the phone. Dude?! Really?! You got bored to wait about 4 months and you did it in 5 days?! Really?! Why did you do it in the summer then?
To be clear, I'm not a Cotulla fan boy (tho I don't think I thanked him enough for his work) but really I haven't seen cedesmith working with the others on MAGLDR and because MAGLDR was so tested and all the drivers/kernels/modules builds were so carefully done and tested we can enjoy Android on HD2 running without bricking our devices (unless you are a completely m0r0n ofc).
Now a admin could please move this thread to the Q&A section please? And please don't ban me for too long for my outrage but since everyone can post on forums... Maybe you could add some: developer only write access to sections? Like this section only developers can open threads
Well, i myself think differently. I think all devs should support CLK, not actually move to it, but support it. I think that in the near future that will be possible.
I myself love CLK, and have no problems with PPP. Specially the fastboot commands were really cool. Of course, this isn't for everyone, just the more advanced users.
And about cedesmith doing it in 5 days/a week, well congrats to him. He should be proud! Of course if he had released it before MAGLDR things would have been different. But we should just all be proud that we have such amazing devs like Cotulla and Cedesmith on our HD2 community.
I also love the fact that we have the option of choice, between CLK and Magldr. If it weren't for the fact that not all roms support CLK, I'd still be using it. So you see, some of us would like to see all roms supporting both magldr and clk.
Just my 2 cents.
Why the cheefs should move? You can run nearly every Image within cLK. Imilka's brand new 2.3.3 with Sense is the only Image which will currently not run on my device. But I guess this is independent from the Image because I think it's a problem of my device.
I only have tested round about 20 Images - and every image is working with cLK. If you have questions how to run it - just ask.
But I guess it's not fair to claim to a really good work from Cotulla.
Use it and teach yourself to solve issues with cLK. Btw, in the meantime I'm also using the cLK but it's only in cause of having a faked native ANDROID device. I like this funny thing.
Last words to this Thread. Someone should close it.
Thanks!
Both of them, cotulla and cedesmith, are simply amazing and great devs in this XDA community.
regards,
morisa
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk
You can choose any you like,clk or magldr.I like magldr .clk just support android but magldr support android and wp7 .
dlsniper said:
I can't care less about the no reply in here message. Devs are aware of it and some of the added cLK to the support list and even the official kernel added the patches for it.
What I don't understand is why would you want for everyone to 'move' to cLK?
Cause you don't see the MAGLDR interface while booting? Is that really the reason?
For the fastboot option which most of the user don't know how to use it? (have you've seen how bright are some posts from all these threads?)
For all bugs it has with the PPP connection or with RMNET (I think the last one doesn't even work)?
Cause it's open source? I really can't care less if Cotulla will never release the source for it, thanks to his hard work (and all the others) I can still keep a two years old phone faster that a Galaxy S.
Cause it doesn't look like a Android phone while booting? Go buy a phone running Android natively since it's clear you don't understand that this is not a native Android phone.
Oh and what's that booting into Windows??! Really?! After all this time you still couldn't read that MAGLDR doesn't boot Windows before it loads?! And you bash it?!
As a final word... I remember cedesmith saying something like this: I got bored waiting for Cotulla to release MAGLDR so this is my 5 days work (or something very close, 1 week top) to run Android natively on the phone. Dude?! Really?! You got bored to wait about 4 months and you did it in 5 days?! Really?! Why did you do it in the summer then?
To be clear, I'm not a Cotulla fan boy (tho I don't think I thanked him enough for his work) but really I haven't seen cedesmith working with the others on MAGLDR and because MAGLDR was so tested and all the drivers/kernels/modules builds were so carefully done and tested we can enjoy Android on HD2 running without bricking our devices (unless you are a completely m0r0n ofc).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
This shows exactly how i feel about this.
Also, i think this post should be moved to the proper section or closed.
dlsniper said:
As a final word... I remember cedesmith saying something like this: I got bored waiting for Cotulla to release MAGLDR so this is my 5 days work (or something very close, 1 week top) to run Android natively on the phone. Dude?! Really?! You got bored to wait about 4 months and you did it in 5 days?! Really?! Why did you do it in the summer then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, I don't see what's wrong if he built it one day or 5 days..If it works well then what's the problem in it? And besides he did not actually built it, he ported it to HD2 from some other open source project...and FYI he's made several contributions to HD2 community before also..
I agree with OP, since its open source it should be promoted. Chef's should look into adding support for cLK also, you never know in future somebody develops it further into more functional program, although I'm not in favor dumping MAGLDR, its a great piece of software and still is more superior to clk in some ways...both can co-exist
dlsniper said:
What I don't understand is why would you want for everyone to 'move' to cLK?
For the fastboot option which most of the user don't know how to use it? (have you've seen how bright are some posts from all these threads?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he didn't say everyone, read again
dlsniper said:
For all bugs it has with the PPP connection or with RMNET (I think the last one doesn't even work)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this an issue that can't be solved with the involvement of the more knowledgeable people here?
dlsniper said:
Cause it's open source? I really can't care less if Cotulla will never release the source for it, thanks to his hard work (and all the others) I can still keep a two years old phone faster that a Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this has nothing to do with cotulla.
dlsniper said:
Cause it doesn't look like a Android phone while booting? Go buy a phone running Android natively since it's clear you don't understand that this is not a native Android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
completely unnecessary from you...
dlsniper said:
Oh and what's that booting into Windows??! Really?! After all this time you still couldn't read that MAGLDR doesn't boot Windows before it loads?! And you bash it?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again, he didn't say that. he meant you can flash clk without windows
dlsniper said:
As a final word... I remember cedesmith saying something like this: I got bored waiting for Cotulla to release MAGLDR so this is my 5 days work (or something very close, 1 week top) to run Android natively on the phone. Dude?! Really?! You got bored to wait about 4 months and you did it in 5 days?! Really?! Why did you do it in the summer then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you twisted cedesmith's words, he didn't say it like you're trying to show here. very very rude and disrespectful from you...
dlsniper said:
To be clear, I'm not a Cotulla fan boy (tho I don't think I thanked him enough for his work) but really I haven't seen cedesmith working with the others on MAGLDR and because MAGLDR was so tested and all the drivers/kernels/modules builds were so carefully done and tested we can enjoy Android on HD2 running without bricking our devices (unless you are a completely m0r0n ofc).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am very grateful to cotulla myself and i'm also one of many who donated to him. he is probably the most important developer for our device but i think it won't hurt to have other talented people like him around, don't you think?
There is no reason to be a hater or fanboy of either bootloaders. They are just that, bootloaders. Pros and cons exist for both. We should be glad we even have a choice to run android nand on our Windows Mobile device. Anyone remember the SD card days of booting into WM6.5 followed by starting android? lol.
I personally run cLK since it meets my needs. But lets not forget Magldr can boot WP7 and android SD builds.... If I needed either one of those, Magldr would be the clear choice.
Let's keep this thread civil. Please stick to the topic and don't flame people for their opinions. thanks
noellenchris
g30rg10u said:
I am very sorry if this is not appropriate, but I strongly believe that cedesmith's Little Kernel bootloader should be part of our HD2 lifes and CHEFS should adopt it for their own gains. For those who are only interested.
If this is considered inappropriate, please remove this thread from your forum.
Six main reasons why i believe so:
1. three-command complete ROM flash in less than 2min using fastboot
testing becomes joy
2. operating system independent
no need to load "Windows"
3. no bootloader specific screen to interrupt booting unless you want it
doesnt feel nice
4. open source, can be edited and upgraded
XDA is what is all about
5. native android feel and look
this is what we have all been looking for
6. Ability to use ClockWork Recovery as well
for those who still prefer CWR.
********* PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD. NO NEED. REFER TO THE ORIGINAL THREAD FOR QUESTIONS ********************
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=901305
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're smart enough to know the advantages of cLK over magldr but yet you post a request for developers in the NAND Dev section? Come on dude.....
i wanted to reply for the criticism but this guy covered me completely.
Originally Posted by dlsniper
What I don't understand is why would you want for everyone to 'move' to cLK?
For the fastboot option which most of the user don't know how to use it? (have you've seen how bright are some posts from all these threads?)
he didn't say everyone, read again
Originally Posted by dlsniper
For all bugs it has with the PPP connection or with RMNET (I think the last one doesn't even work)?
is this an issue that can't be solved with the involvement of the more knowledgeable people here?
Originally Posted by dlsniper
Cause it's open source? I really can't care less if Cotulla will never release the source for it, thanks to his hard work (and all the others) I can still keep a two years old phone faster that a Galaxy S.
this has nothing to do with cotulla.
Originally Posted by dlsniper
Cause it doesn't look like a Android phone while booting? Go buy a phone running Android natively since it's clear you don't understand that this is not a native Android phone.
completely unnecessary from you...
Originally Posted by dlsniper
Oh and what's that booting into Windows??! Really?! After all this time you still couldn't read that MAGLDR doesn't boot Windows before it loads?! And you bash it?!
again, he didn't say that. he meant you can flash clk without windows
Originally Posted by dlsniper
As a final word... I remember cedesmith saying something like this: I got bored waiting for Cotulla to release MAGLDR so this is my 5 days work (or something very close, 1 week top) to run Android natively on the phone. Dude?! Really?! You got bored to wait about 4 months and you did it in 5 days?! Really?! Why did you do it in the summer then?
you twisted cedesmith's words, he didn't say it like you're trying to show here. very very rude and disrespectful from you...
Originally Posted by dlsniper
To be clear, I'm not a Cotulla fan boy (tho I don't think I thanked him enough for his work) but really I haven't seen cedesmith working with the others on MAGLDR and because MAGLDR was so tested and all the drivers/kernels/modules builds were so carefully done and tested we can enjoy Android on HD2 running without bricking our devices (unless you are a completely m0r0n ofc).
i am very grateful to cotulla myself and i'm also one of many who donated to him. he is probably the most important developer for our device but i think it won't hurt to have other talented people like him around, don't you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as for the last one.. yes Android NAND Dev was the forum i chose, because here chefs post their builds/roms.
Thanks and apologies if anyone got upset. never had negative intentions, never said anything bad about MAGLDR nor Cotulla, but for native Linux/OSX users, booting into Windows and wait 25min to flash (PC windows not WinMo) is not as pleasant as you might think .
I will move to it when the ROMS I use do. I was using an HTC Magic in the past so I'll do everything to reach the full-Android experience from Boot to shutdown...
DannyBiker said:
I will move to it when the ROMS I use do. I was using an HTC Magic in the past so I'll do everything to reach the full-Android experience from Boot to shutdown...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you have to do is swap out the initrd, to a supported one, and get a cLK kernel
hi guys
just wanted to check:
when our awsome devs finish thier great job with the android, whos gonna change to andoid and whos gonna stick to winmo?
i dont know if this question should be here but i will answer and im sticking to both.....
Android 4 ever!!!
I also choose Android. I can't wait for next relase
I buy Mini less then a year ago, becourse of WinMo (it was more soft for it). But now the situation has changed... So android is more nice for me.
Only, one thing is not good, as for me, in android - there is no such application as RescoPhotoManager in it.
liorderei said:
hi guys
just wanted to check:
when our awsome devs finish thier great job with the android, whos gonna change to andoid and whos gonna stick to winmo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you don't try both OS ...You can "Install" Android on SD, without delete WinMo, and test it if you dislike it format your SD , but if you like it continue to read
Anyway Look: http://htc-linux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PhotonStatus
Stutus of Development
https://code.google.com/p/photon-android/wiki/Android_Installation_Tutorial
How to Install
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1110578
FAQ About Android Porting
it's all
bye
HTCxxxx said:
Because you don't try both OS ...You can "Install" Android on SD, without delete WinMo, and test it if you dislike it format your SD , but if you like it continue to read
Anyway Look: http://htc-linux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PhotonStatus
Stutus of Development
https://code.google.com/p/photon-android/wiki/Android_Installation_Tutorial
How to Install
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1110578
FAQ About Android Porting
it's all
bye
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks you, but ive already installed android,and asked the question for the sake of conversation anyway i prefer android then windows mobile (microsoft doesnt put efforts in developing her market especially in hvga and wm6.5)
liorderei said:
thanks you, but ive already installed android,and asked the question for the sake of conversation anyway i prefer android then windows mobile (microsoft doesnt put efforts in developing her market especially in hvga and wm6.5)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yhea it's right...I Love Android
HTCxxxx said:
Yhea it's right...I Love Android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how i put android not with sd card only to have android and not windows
In this moment is not possibile...
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
And there isnt enough space to install android in internal storage...
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App