Whats everybodys linpack scores
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
edward.hidalgo said:
Whats everybodys linpack scores
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See my signature.
Reason im asking because im thinking about getting the shift today
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
edward.hidalgo said:
Reason im asking because im thinking about getting the shift today
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm sure you already know, any benchmarking software is only good for scores and is no real indication of everyday performance.
With that said, this phone is quick, smooth and sleek all as a stock phone. I can't wait for permroot.
If you don't mind the smaller screen and added thickness, I think you'll be a happy convert (from the original Evo)
Let us know if you need anything else.
Thanks for your information
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
In the Sig
Linpack and Quadrant benchmarks are flawed..mostly on snapdragon processors..try Smartbench 2010
I get usually 1500+ pretty good for stock in my opinion. I'll try smartbench
Related
Hey so whats new with the overclocking, I know its oc'ed at 1.2 but is there anyone that has it higher than that?
Sent from my Galaxy Superbeast using XDA app
Julianmgn said:
Hey so whats new with the overclocking, I know its oc'ed at 1.2 but is there anyone that has it higher than that?
Sent from my Galaxy Superbeast using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Baked snack is 1.3ghz but its unstable on select handsets. Next time before asking a question like this check out the wiki at the top of the page
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Do we even need to overclock? Lol... this phone zips!
Sent from my Epic 4G
1.3ghz here with no issues. Constants 10.5 in linpack and phone is really snappy
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
sultan.of.swing said:
1.3ghz here with no issues. Constants 10.5 in linpack and phone is really snappy
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X2 highest I've got is 10.9xx but litterally every run is between 10.3 and 10.7
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Wait til Froyo comes out with JIT support
I wonder what kind of scores we will get with that? I don't know about the 50s I've seen from other phones
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
well i already have a Froyo rom with jit enabled
and i get 13 at least on linpack but i want an OC'ed kernel lol
Julianmgn said:
well i already have a Froyo rom with jit enabled
and i get 13 at least on linpack but i want an OC'ed kernel lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is the Epic forums so good luck with your Vaginabrant.
Lol dude no need for that
sent from my epic 4g with no 4g
churro7 said:
Lol dude no need for that
sent from my epic 4g with no 4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess, my apologies OP i'm just jealous that you have a Froyo build :-( But i has 1.3ghz oc mwuaahhahahaha!!!!
Anyone check the highest linpack score for the evo shift lately? Dodgejcr seems to have 1920mhz stable enough for testing linpack
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
DWake014 said:
Anyone check the highest linpack score for the evo shift lately? Dodgejcr seems to have 1920mhz stable enough for testing linpack
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to see him get that stable on our device.
I had a 64.xxx run while on sense that I uploaded under PG06100 instead of htc evo shift I ran her again on CM7 and am in second place with 63.866
Sent From My Speedy Mc Speederson
Yeah or at least release a kernel for testing. Nice score, mine keeps capping out at 63.752 on nfx 2.0 odex
I just hit 63.946
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA Premium App
So is there a kernal for going past 1.8gHz?
It looks like it may be developer only, I'm thinking it may be very unstable
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx
KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.
For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.
Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.