Hi everybody,
I'm new on this Trophy forum, I just bought one last week.
I had a Touch HD (blackstone) before and I used G10 Dusk roms.
Trophy is a very good phone, W7 is very different and less graphic that the HTC sense on WM6.5 but it's very fast and simple.
I have a question:
On HTC web site, HTC says that Mozart and Trophy are the same.
What do you think ?
Regards.
Where did u get that info from? Can't find it on the HTC site.
But to clear that for you: Trophy != Mozart.
Mozart hast (as far as I know a 8 MP Camera), Trophy doesnt.
Additionally the Mozart looks a bit different.
And Mozart has a smaller screen. But otherwise Bo difference. Hardware is the same, features such as srs and Dolby are the same. In fact the detailed specs on the HTC site is word for word the same except for camera and screen size
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
OnlinePredator said:
And Mozart has a smaller screen. But otherwise Bo difference. Hardware is the same, features such as srs and Dolby are the same. In fact the detailed specs on the HTC site is word for word the same except for camera and screen size
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, I believe that all the WP7 devices in the market at this moment have almost the same hardware, except for the screen and the camera. i.e. all have 1GHz processor, the same amount of ROM and RAM, more or less, and so on.
I think that Microsoft give a list to the manufacturers with a minimun hardware requirements to make WP7 devices. So all options are good for us. IMHO.
Cheers!
well sergio, your statement isn't entirely corect. Yes they all appear the same, and yes MS did set minimum hardware requirements, and yes screen and camera are the common difference, but also a good example is Samsung's implementation of memory compared to HTC. Samsung uses NAND memory compared to HTC's microSD. Speeds are a lot greater in Samsung devices than HTC.
The Gate Keeper said:
well sergio, your statement isn't entirely corect. Yes they all appear the same, and yes MS did set minimum hardware requirements, and yes screen and camera are the common difference, but also a good example is Samsung's implementation of memory compared to HTC. Samsung uses NAND memory compared to HTC's microSD. Speeds are a lot greater in Samsung devices than HTC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your replay. I believe that HTC 7 Trophy has NAND memory instead of the microSD, but I can not prove cause I don't have an Omnia 7 to try if it recognizes their memory as a class 0, like the Trophy one. I think that the answer is in this point, because the fact that recognize the memory as a "sandisk class 0" does not necessarily mean it is an SD card. Sandisk makes NAND memory too, I believe.
But I'm not 100% sure of this.
sergioalvarezmac said:
Thanks for your replay. I believe that HTC 7 Trophy has NAND memory instead of the microSD, but I can not prove cause I don't have an Omnia 7 to try if it recognizes their memory as a class 0, like the Trophy one. I think that the answer is in this point, because the fact that recognize the memory as a "sandisk class 0" does not necessarily mean it is an SD card. Sandisk makes NAND memory too, I believe.
But I'm not 100% sure of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
allow me to point you to this to show my case...
http://www.wpcentral.com/speed-test-samsung-focus-vs-htc-hd7-video
Hi,
It's a HTC's french web site error: http://www.htc.com/fr/search.aspx?cat=0&page=0&q=trophy
They didn't translate Trophy page so they transferred it to... the Mozart's page.
Thanks
The Gate Keeper said:
allow me to point you to this to show my case...
http://www.wpcentral.com/speed-test-samsung-focus-vs-htc-hd7-video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this visual ad. I suppose that until someone try to "destroy" his Trophy into a million pieces we never know if it has NAND or SDcard. The second option is obviously the most cheap.
Thanks again for being so patient with this newbie. I only have a little knowledge of Android at this time.
i think you mean windows phone in this case . android doesn't power the tiles
Just one thing missed. The Trophy has an LED flash for the camera that can also be used as a torch.
enak said:
Just one thing missed. The Trophy has an LED flash for the camera that can also be used as a torch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really depends on what you want. The Mozart's Xenon would capture darker pictures better. I usually just about:blank on a web browser and *bam* the screen is your torch
Related
A new Samsung mobile has been unveiled. The Samsung M8800 Pixon.
Pretty neat, and definitely a successor to Omnia (same widget today screen, so definitely a WinMo device)
http://www.tracyandmatt.co.uk/blogs/index.php/2008/09/29/samsung-m8800-pixon-press-photos-aamp-sp
The problems with this one? For such a beatiful screen, a very low resolution. And also only upto 8 GB Micro SD supported with only 200 MB internal memory.
What do you think?
doesnt look like a winmo device.
but its still VERY nice
i love the 8 megapixel camera.
you see what you get when a universal electronics company decides that they make phones and cameras but why not have them all togther in one?
kidnamedAlbert said:
doesnt look like a winmo device.
but its still VERY nice
i love the 8 megapixel camera.
you see what you get when a universal electronics company decides that they make phones and cameras but why not have them all togther in one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am 99.9% positive it'll be a WinMo device... (especially in regards to the dashboard interface they introduced in Omnia)
ithink it isn;t WinMo, because:
1. It don't show start bar like omnia (Today screen totally different from omnia) i can say that because my father use omnia.
2. Samsung usualy give their product code with ixxx for their WinMo line up.
So i guess is not WinMo
cornelius said:
ithink it isn;t WinMo, because:
1. It don't show start bar like omnia (Today screen totally different from omnia) i can say that because my father use omnia.
2. Samsung usualy give their product code with ixxx for their WinMo line up.
So i guess is not WinMo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope you're right, if it has Android I'm buying it once it supports US 3G frequencies. Case closed, that will be my new phone.
Note to mods: This shouldn't be here, if you can move to General that'd be great.
msalmank said:
A new Samsung mobile has been unveiled. The Samsung M8800 Pixon.
Pretty neat, and definitely a successor to Omnia (same widget today screen, so definitely a WinMo device)
http://www.tracyandmatt.co.uk/blogs/index.php/2008/09/29/samsung-m8800-pixon-press-photos-aamp-sp
The problems with this one? For such a beatiful screen, a very low resolution. And also only upto 8 GB Micro SD supported with only 200 MB internal memory.
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung?... Pixon?.... Omnia?... WRONG THREAD!!!
Yep my bad for starting this here...
msalmank said:
Yep my bad for starting this here...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. You are always welcome. I rather have you here than in another place.
Pinguino1 said:
No problem. You are always welcome. I rather have you here than in another place.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..............................
Don't think its a WinMo phone either. LGs 8MP monster has a widget-based homescreen but isn't WinMo, the Samsung looks a lot like that.
NZtechfreak said:
Don't think its a WinMo phone either. LGs 8MP monster has a widget-based homescreen but isn't WinMo, the Samsung looks a lot like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the Omnia also has a widget-based homescreen, and that does have WM. I'd say it's more likely to have WM considering it seems to be an Omnia clone. If it doesn't have WM, I think it'd be like the Tocco and have its own operating conditions... Not using Android.
of what are u talkin all about?
it has windows mobile:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-m8800-en.shtml
NO WM here. It hardly have a brower.
Nice hardware.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_m8800_pixon-2535.php
Black93300ZX said:
But the Omnia also has a widget-based homescreen, and that does have WM. I'd say it's more likely to have WM considering it seems to be an Omnia clone. If it doesn't have WM, I think it'd be like the Tocco and have its own operating conditions... Not using Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not every widget based home screen from samsung is WinMo, even the widget first appereance is not on WinMo device.
And they still sell thier omnia as first line.
And see slowly on home screen it's totally different with omnia.
cornelius said:
not every widget based home screen from samsung is WinMo, even the widget first appereance is not on WinMo device.
And they still sell thier omnia as first line.
And see slowly on home screen it's totally different with omnia.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly as I said, it is likely to have its own operating conditions or Windows Mobile, not Android. It doesn't have WM, nor does it have Android... The link posted above confirms that.
Black93300ZX said:
Exactly as I said, it is likely to have its own operating conditions or Windows Mobile, not Android. It doesn't have WM, nor does it have Android... The link posted above confirms that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry miss reading....
Do you think that this is the LEO?
http://www.mobiles.co.uk/htc-touch-hd2.html
Nice find.
Judging by the "Full Spec" tab it's the Leo.
Budadank said:
Nice find.
Judging by the "Full Spec" tab it's the Leo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't realise there was a full spec there allready. It does actually say "The HTC Touch HD 2 is also known as the Leo and Pro 3"
Doesn't say anything about a Digital Compass!! Is it supposed to have one?
richardirv said:
Do you think that this is the LEO?
http://www.mobiles.co.uk/htc-touch-hd2.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, must have missed that one
richardirv said:
Didn't realise there was a full spec there allready. It does actually say "The HTC Touch HD 2 is also known as the Leo and Pro 3"
Doesn't say anything about a Digital Compass!! Is it supposed to have one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK the Leo definitely is supposed to have a compass! If it doesn't, that would be the dumbest mistake HTC ever made... A 3 $ piece of hardware missing that would make a 600 $ phone so much better...
MAMeingast said:
AFAIK the Leo definitely is supposed to have a compass! If it doesn't, that would be the dumbest mistake HTC ever made... A 3 $ piece of hardware missing that would make a 600 $ phone so much better...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets just hope that its just the Spec that is wrong!
lets hope digital compass is included in phone
otherwise it would be a real blunder by htc
i think camera should be 8MP at least because 5MP is outdated .........
any how waiting for device .........
I am a bit suspicious but....
http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/25/htc-leo-looking-confirmed-for-o2-uk-debut-will-be-free-on-the-r/
As to spec - I imagine that the specs touted to date are generally on the money, but also quite incomplete. I too heave read that the Leo is predicted to have a digi compass, I guess the next few days will reveal all - little point in HTC keeping this thing under wraps any longer, it's most definitely out of the bag now!
I am getting very very impatient - I WANT this phone!
- 12th Oct?! That's do-able...
Oddly - the aspect of it that atracts me the most (as in, if it didn't have it, I probably wouldn't shell out the £500-ish for the SIM free version I typically buy) is the capacitive screen - I absolutely HATE resistive screens and has long been a bugbear on WM touchphones.
commando0 said:
i think camera should be 8MP at least because 5MP is outdated .........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The MP-count is not important anymore... A 5 MP camera can be far better than any 8 MP camera with the right hardware and software! So a higher MP-number doesn't say anything about the quality of the pictures anymore...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm
MAMeingast said:
The MP-count is not important anymore... A 5 MP camera can be far better than any 8 MP camera with the right hardware and software! So a higher MP-number doesn't say anything about the quality of the pictures anymore...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whilst the underlying message that pixels are not the be-all and end-all is correct, a lot of what 'Ken' says is plain wrong.
A VGA-resolution camera is NOT good enough to produce 6x4 prints, not by a mile. 300dpi is taken to be the measure of a true 'photo quality' print, which means you need around a 2MP camera to produce a decent print at that size.
As for mobiles.co.uk, they seem to list every handset ever announced on their 'Coming Soon' page, whether they end up carrying it or not.
They've even got the fabled Sony Ericsson X3 listed.
Another mistake:
"3G
The HTC Touch HD2, formerly known as the Leo, features 3G which stands for third generation, and the system is the third generation in the evolution of mobile networks, after analogue and GSM. 3G offers high speed data transfers and the ability to make video calls between compatible mobile phones."
HTC Leo hasn´t videoconference.
The part you have highlighted is just a standard blurb about what 3G is.
3G, as a technology, does allow people to make video-calls. So that part is not incorrect.
And Leo is a 3G-capable phone, so that's correct as well.
It doesn't actually say Leo is capable of making video-calls though.
So whilst it is certainly a poorly-worded and misleading piece of text, technically speaking it's not incorrect.
Think we can safely assume that the full spec for the Leo hasn't been officially released yet and a lot of people/sites are making educated guessing with no confirmation. Until HTC officially release this I take all other sites specs with a pince of salt!!
Mobiles have also had the HTC Max 4G on their site for an absolute age although as far as I know this phone was never released in the UK. Have you seen the blogs about the O2 catalogue with pictures of the HTC HD2: http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/htc-hd2-makes-first-official-appearance-in-o2-uk-catalog/
PowerupMobile said:
Mobiles have also had the HTC Max 4G on their site...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I noticed that.
It'll never be released in the UK, there's no Wi-max networks for it to run on.
i think the HD2 is an amazing piece of hardware and its clearly better than any other competing product in the coming few months. i do however hate a few things about it:
1-the lack of front camera for 3G video calls. while i may not care a lot about video calls i imagine that many will be missing it.
2-i see no point of releasing a separate delayed hardware revision for US market. especially when you consider that the rest of the world version lacks the front camera just like every other US phone. the Acer F1(another 1 GHZ 3G phone) has been available for a while and it supports US 3G bands on the same hardware and it even has the front camera.
3- considering that its the best multimedia phone made by HTC, its lacking the TV-out and the FM-Radio transmitter and better camera(all of which are supported by the N97)
4- the included 512MB ROM is a joke. i know that it can be expanded with SD card. but extra flash on the device is always useful. the 1.5 year old Omnia had 8/16/24BG+microSD why cant this have it. adding 8 or 16 GB flash costs HTC almost nothing to add
5-lack of stylus: HTC patented the capacitive stylus but they didnt use it. i know the the screen is big enough to be very finger friendly. but its still windows mobile and some applications work need stylus (for example Pocket artist).
6- lack of hardware buttons (especially camera). i wish the added 2 or 3 buttons on the empty sides. WM will always make use of the hardware buttons
7-despite the very high specs, its still less than the minimum Windows mobile7 specs (which requires Tegra level graphics performance acceleration and bigger than integrated storage ) which means that it will not be
upgradeable to wm7.
8-i dont understand the 320+128MB. the dedicated 128MB for the low performing graphics chip seems pointless to me. if they are going to put all this memory there why didnt they allocate it to program memory.
9- i really love how HTC managed to make the device reasonably small considering the huge 4.3" screen. i still think that its physically too big for many people. the HD was not very pocket friendly and this one is even bigger. i wish the screen was 4.0" or even 3.8". considering their recent improved and more efficient designs, im sure HTC would have been able to even make it friendly for one hand use with a smaller screen.
10- im not too big on the new standard micro-USB connector. they should have at lest included the hard to find mini-USB to micro-USB adapter with it. everybody already has several mini-USB cables/chargers but ive never actually seen a micro USB yet.
11- they increased up the specs (and power usage i would assume) significantly from the first HD but they reduced the battery size from 1350 to 1250mah!!!. luckily the early reports are suggesting "acceptable" battery life
Only thing missing for me on the device is a decent camera. I don't mean HTC standard... I mean the best of Nokia, Samsung & Sony Ericsson. The original HD took terrible pictures and videos. I don't think there is much improvement in this area from previews and videos.
TV-Out would of been great but sadly missing.
I don't care about front camera because I hardly ever use video call.
It's probably more of a business centric device but with such a large screen it could have so easily been the ultimate work and pleasure phone.
I'm leaning towards the Nokia N900 (Linux) but still undecided.
Just some thoughts for your annoyances! (I currently own an Omnia too)
THE GRIZZ said:
1-the lack of front camera for 3G video calls. while i may not care a lot about video calls i imagine that many will be missing it.
3G has been around for a while with a front video camera, but I can truly say that I don't know a single person that actually uses it. It's a gimmick IMO.
2-i see no point of releasing a separate delayed hardware revision for US market. especially when you consider that the rest of the world version lacks the front camera just like every other US phone. the Acer F1(another 1 GHZ 3G phone) has been available for a while and it supports US 3G bands on the same hardware and it even has the front camera.
I don't see the point either - bit silly if you ask me.
3- considering that its the best multimedia phone made by HTC, its lacking the TV-out and the FM-Radio transmitter and better camera(all of which are supported by the N97)
FM what? It still bedazzles me that people listen to FM radio these days. Surely most people have unlimited internet now and like I just use internet radio. More stations! As for the TV-out, again, I don't see the point really. Personally I use my netbook/laptop/pc for plugging into a tv since they can play HD. I supposed it would be nice if you want to show off photos to friends but then we all have facebook these days anyway For me, not a sore exclusion.
4- the included 512MB ROM is a joke. i know that it can be expanded with SD card. but extra flash on the device is always useful. the 1.5 year old Omnia had 8/16/24BG+microSD why cant this have it. adding 8 or 16 GB flash costs HTC almost nothing to add
I love the additional 8GB of the Omnia, but I guess they have to keep costs down somewhere. I have a 16GB micro SD, but when are 24/32 going to be available? Anyone know?
5-lack of stylus: HTC patented the capacitive stylus but they didnt use it. i know the the screen is big enough to be very finger friendly. but its still windows mobile and some applications work need stylus (for example Pocket artist).
I think you can still use a stylus but you have to set it up to do so (I saw it in another post on here).
6- lack of hardware buttons (especially camera). i wish the added 2 or 3 buttons on the empty sides. WM will always make use of the hardware buttons
There is no excuse for extra buttons down the side, although it makes it a bit more sleek I guess. But it's not like it doesn't take photos, it's just a useablitly thing.
7-despite the very high specs, its still less than the minimum Windows mobile7 specs (which requires Tegra level graphics performance acceleration) which means that it will not be
upgradeable to wm7.
I'm not sure that's right is it? In that original Leo thread in the main board, wasn't it confirmed that it will be upgradable? I think it's remains a bit of an unknown at the moment. That said, will wm7 be complete in 12 months? Given M$'s history of keeping to their planned dates, I doubt it. I think cookers will make it happen anyway and if not, in 12 months it will be upgrade time. Did someone say HD3?!
8-i dont understand the 320+128MB. the dedicated 128MB for the low performing graphics chip seems pointless to me. if they are going to put all this memory there why didnt they allocate it to program memory.
This one I have no idea about. Maybe they have something clever up their sleeves?
9- i really love how HTC managed to make the device reasonably small considering the huge 4.3" screen. i still think that its physically too big for many people. the HD was not very pocket friendly and this one is even bigger. i wish the screen was 4.0" or even 3.8". considering their recent improved and more efficient designs, im sure HTC would have been able to even make it friendly for one hand use with a smaller screen.
Well lets look at the iPhone. It's a huge seller. The HD2 is only a couple of mm's wider and taller so I don't see anyone is going to see it as an issue when they put it in their hands.
10- im not too big on the micro-USB connector. they should have at lest included the hard to find mini-USB adapter with it. everybody already has several mini-USB cables/chargers but ive never actually seen a micro USB yet.
I totally disagree here. It's the new universal format. You won't have seen many yet because devices are JUST beginning to emerge with it (ie Omnia 2). Already it's working because Samsung usually have their own proprietary connector so to see them go universal is a fantastic step in the right direction. It would be blind of HTC not to follow. So yes, bin those old Mini-USB
11- they increased up the specs (and power usage i would assume) significantly from the first HD but they reduced the battery size from 1350 to 1250mah!!!. luckily the early reports are suggesting "acceptable" battery life
I really hope it can last at least one full day of decent usage without the requirement of a charge. Surely they wouldn't make this wonderful device then shoot themselves in the foot??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyway some good points there!
7-despite the very high specs, its still less than the minimum Windows mobile7 specs (which requires Tegra level graphics performance acceleration) which means that it will not be
upgradeable to wm7
I'm not sure that's right is it? In that original Leo thread in the main board, wasn't it confirmed that it will be upgradable? I think it's remains a bit of an unknown at the moment. That said, will wm7 be complete in 12 months? Given M$'s history of keeping to their planned dates, I doubt it. I think cookers will make it happen anyway and if not, in 12 months it will be upgrade time. Did someone say HD3?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is very likely WM7 will be out by mid to late next year. WM8 is already being discussed as I understand it and WM6 and 6.5 have been universally panned (and quite rightly).
So if you purchase the HD2 assuming it will be out of date in less than 10 months then all well but I suspect many will not be happy (including me). I don't mind spending extra bucks now to avoid doubling my investment by having to purchase two devices in the space of 10 months!
Do you have the link to the original "in the original Leo thread in the main board, wasn't it confirmed that it will be upgradable? "
add this to the list:
1. lack of full-fledged graphics drivers (3D)
2. lack of d-pad; or trackball like blackberrys
1) Front Camera - most people don't use them so not a big deal
2) Buy the Acer if you like it (have fun)
3) it has got an FM Radio onboard I believe
4) Memory could be better but its got an SD card so just by a 16gb card.
5) The point is you don't need a stylus - am I missing something. If you wannt a Stylus get an Omnia 2
6) The camera button could have been useful - but nobody knows if one of the front buttons cannot be used. Shall we wait till its been reviewed fully before we slag it off.
7) Its been clearly stated that the specs do not say "Tegra" only. Thats just not true. Makes me laugh that a phone with great 3d potential and dedicated memory like the HD2 is being slagged off for no reason.
8) The screen size is the best part of the phone - it can be used to watch video, surf the net, etc. So it has to be big to fit the screen - not an issue.
9) Micro-USB!! - You mean the defacto standard now.
10) Nobody knows about battery life yet so lets hold fire.
Why are you interested in the phone if non of its main selling points you like?
because despite its "limitations" its still a lot better than the rest now.
take a chill pill dude and try to tone-down the fanboiasm. our nitpicking will make it very easy for HTC to make the HD3 a better device. also by highlighting them so early in its life, it will make easy easy for its users to deal with its potential issues
Teneka_Khan said:
1) Front Camera - most people don't use them so not a big deal
2) Buy the Acer if you like it (have fun)
3) it has got an FM Radio onboard I believe
4) Memory could be better but its got an SD card so just by a 16gb card.
5) The point is you don't need a stylus - am I missing something. If you wannt a Stylus get an Omnia 2
6) The camera button could have been useful - but nobody knows if one of the front buttons cannot be used. Shall we wait till its been reviewed fully before we slag it off.
7) Its been clearly stated that the specs do not say "Tegra" only. Thats just not true. Makes me laugh that a phone with great 3d potential and dedicated memory like the HD2 is being slagged off for no reason.
8) The screen size is the best part of the phone - it can be used to watch video, surf the net, etc. So it has to be big to fit the screen - not an issue.
9) Micro-USB!! - You mean the defacto standard now.
10) Nobody knows about battery life yet so lets hold fire.
Why are you interested in the phone if non of its main selling points you like?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haved discovered that it does support WM7http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=7528 states
(QCOM 8k, Nvidia “Tegra” AP15/16* and TI 3430 all meet spec)
Qualcomm 8k = Snapdragon's QSD8xxx-series chips = Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8250 (which is in the Leo).. so the processor should meet WM7 chassis 1 requirement.
To answer the FM radio question - the answer is YES
http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_hd2-2957.php
I agree with the comments above. There is no such thing as a perfect device but you have got to congratulate HTC on the HD2 being one of the closest to it.
alecs said:
I haved discovered that it does support WM7http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=7528 states
(QCOM 8k, Nvidia “Tegra” AP15/16* and TI 3430 all meet spec)
Qualcomm 8k = Snapdragon's QSD8xxx-series chips = Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8250 (which is in the Leo).. so the processor should meet WM7 chassis 1 requirement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The processor does, but the Chassis 1 spec also specifies at least 1GB of flash (and at least 512mb fast flash).
The HD2 only comes with 512mb internal memory.
Sc4Freak said:
The processor does, but the Chassis 1 spec also specifies at least 1GB of flash (and at least 512mb fast flash).
The HD2 only comes with 512mb internal memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By 1GB of flash I believe that means available storage i.e. an SD card
Memory: 256MB+ DRAM, 1G+ Flash (at least 512MB fast flash – 5MB/s unbuffered read @4K block size)
I am not sure what fast flash means but these are minumum specs and doesn't mean the device can't run WM7, it may just lag in certain spots though somehow I doubt this thing will lag even on WM7
Is the specified 65k for the screen a hardware or software limitation? I know Windows Mobile 6.5 only supports 65k effective colors, but when WM 7 launches would the device be able to display more colors?
Toss3 said:
Is the specified 65k for the screen a hardware or software limitation? I know Windows Mobile 6.5 only supports 65k effective colors, but when WM 7 launches would the device be able to display more colors?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure it does . they dont make "65K color display" !
Most mobile phone LCD screens are 262K colours (18-bit). (This includes many of the displays used on phones that are advertised as supporting 24-bit colour.)
manuelcalavera said:
sure it does . they dont make "65K color display" !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But does anyone know the actual maximum bit-depth of the display?
The GRIZZ said:
3- considering that its the best multimedia phone made by HTC, its lacking the TV-out and the FM-Radio transmitter and better camera(all of which are supported by the N97)
FM what? It still bedazzles me that people listen to FM radio these days. Surely most people have unlimited internet now and like I just use internet radio. More stations! As for the TV-out, again, I don't see the point really. Personally I use my netbook/laptop/pc for plugging into a tv since they can play HD. I supposed it would be nice if you want to show off photos to friends but then we all have facebook these days anyway For me, not a sore exclusion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude theres a difference between FM Receiver and FM Transmitter. A FM Transmitter is important for those who own a car. The FM Transmitter can be used to transmit Music at a certain frequency which can be tuned to in the car using the Cars FM Radio!
The HD2 already has a FM Receiver. It might also support FM Transmission capabilities but that depends on which chip its using.
Video Out is certainly a welcome addon. Showing off Photos on a LCD is way better than telling them to login to Facebook! I for one will surely miss the TV Out.
Inspite of that, I consider these two features to be of very less importance when compared to the other feature set. This is the THE KILLER phone everyone was waiting for!
Prefer Touch HD over HD2
I agree with Grizzly on almost every point he's been making so far. Before I catch the flames too I shall start with a story...
My HP iPAQ was stolen from a payphone booth within one minute where I forgot it at an airport a year ago. This was my first real PDA and I was extraordinarily disappointed. I had racked up a lot of apps on it and and had even made the home screen sexy and easy to use with a few mods. Going from interfacing my custom cycles with the PCR machine (lab work) to playing old favourites like SimCity 2000 in lectures was great!
The next thing I obviously wanted was a PDA PHONE, so I didn't have to use a payphone booth again... so I got the Touch HD when it just came out in Oz from Telstra (who still sell it for $1500 - 215% markup). And it was absolutely perfect. Did everything, well supported by the community, and using it as a phone and an organizer that synced with outlook it worked a charm. Then last month getting a taxi back from the pub, I was left at a busway because the taxi driver who was fresh from India could not find my home as it wasn't on the GPS. Calling another taxi I got mugged for it while I was using it, snatched it from my hand. So now I was faced with having to get a new phone.
I have bought a Touch HD again. You see, the HD2 as fantastic as it is, is half way between being a traditional WM phone and an Android phone. Without the use of a stylus, how can you hand write down meeting notes? How can I use all my legacy games and applications? What's the point of having something a little zippier when the new manilla (which is a bit too busy) is going to be hacked onto the Touch HD anyway and it doesn't have the Tegra for true gaming pwnage or audiophile quality audio or a true camera replacement camera? Also the lack of 3G camera ticks me off too. I can't video call my parents in NZ which although is horrendously expensive, I enjoy doing on birthdays and so on - on special occasions we're often away from our computers.
What I am going to do is stick with my tried and tested HD and see if the HD2 has any advantage over the Dragon before I upgrade. Or even other non-HTC devices (god forbid) should they provide Audio/Graphics advantages. Because really the point of this thing is to replace the need to carry around other devices. Otherwise just get something that is only a phone, right?
I just found this vid, shows the games on it and well there is only 1 teeter! How could they cut solitaire and bubble breaker! What am i gonna waste time with now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntZQ0iXzyvc&feature=player_embedded
Its @ about 2:45
THE GRIZZ said:
our nitpicking will make it very easy for HTC to make the HD3 a better device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very much so. HTC an enormous international company dedicated to producing a whole range of phones and mobile devices needs listen to random forum posters who can't even get their facts straight.
I'd like to take the opportunity to thank you for helping make the HD3 into the perfect device, derailing HTC's initial plans of improving the phone by removing the screen entirely and replacing it with a bar of soap. Your factual inaccuracies are making the mobile world a better place.
Since there is no dedicated off/on hardware ringer switch, is there a way to silence the phone while it is locked?
the volume rocker is normally used for something like that
mr_Ray said:
Very much so. HTC an enormous international company dedicated to producing a whole range of phones and mobile devices needs listen to random forum posters who can't even get their facts straight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please spare us your fan-boyish drivel. What I mentioned in the OP are all valid concerns
Ive unsucessfully used the search function to found somethread like this
As a community we are here of Blackstone users, im curious whether will upgrade to HD2?
Actually im satisfied with the HD as i can do everything i need, especially with the ROMs we found here. But i think its question of time that ROM-makers migrate do Leo, isnt it?
MNilson said:
Ive unsucessfully used the search function to found somethread like this
As a community we are here of Blackstone users, im curious whether will upgrade to HD2?
Actually im satisfied with the HD as i can do everything i need, especially with the ROMs we found here. But i think its question of time that ROM-makers migrate do Leo, isnt it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added a 4th option to your poll. Hope you don't mind
ill skip it for winmo 7
Fallen Spartan said:
I added a 4th option to your poll. Hope you don't mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just what the poll needed thanks!! I voted the 4th..
no for me...
more todo with the HD being a work phone. not sure when im due for a replacement but as most places int he current climate - we aint replacing much kit unless it's essential.
HD does me perfect really. does everything i need it to.... although it could be a bit quicker!
i love winmo..which is coming to extreme soon
ofcourse yes
i would like to upgrade
i read opinion out here .. for me I made a query aswell if i could upgrade it or not like what iphone 2g did with 3g 100£ and upgrade option..
for me what i think is htc touch hd is great but two things missing on it...
i.e Responsive ness (really important for being quicker "as someone mentioned up" about htc touch hd not being quicker)
second is multitouch gives lots time saving on internet browsing what i learnt using iphone....
solution on htc touch hd2
multitouch and responsive ness as it uses sensitive (capacitive) screen which is in detailed mentioned on general forum aswell.
of course i am winmo lover as i hate toy type of things and the hype iphone has got.. (yet considering the usability and ease of use it has provided for general users,) i believe our htc touch hd is real tool.
in the end i would love to upgrade if there is anything like upgrade option....... as i still have my 8 months left on contract.
I'd love to, but it's too expensive to consider. I never spent so much in a mobile before as with the HD, and it must last another year at least to be worth the spent.
In most cases if there is something REALLY new on the market, it's a bit like a beta version.
See the first Iphone without 3g, touch hd with rarely supported screensize and the little bit too slow processor, or the first directx 10 cards with to slow performance for this technology, ...
Products with big "improvements" are mostly a little bit beta, so i think it's good to wait and look what's in the future
greets
/skip /skip
Fallen Spartan said:
I added a 4th option to your poll. Hope you don't mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not hehe. I knew that i was missing something. Cheers
Picked 4th one .
Hoping when the winmo7 version comes out, it'll have:
* the front face videocalling camera again (i like how it gives me the option to make videocalls and portrait pics with my gf and mates by giving a preview)
* maybe an even narrower, thinner, shorter body (same 4.3in screen)
* over 1350mah battery size
* that stylus they patented
others I'd like to see:
* Not necessary, but front-touch buttons like the HD. Unless they implement hardware buttons alot better than the HD2 (imo the layout and shape looks ugly)
* oled-amoled screen
My initial reaction to leak specs and pictures was:
No....not enough improvements for me to consider
When 6.5 Leo ROMs came out I was like:
Upgrade? I can have WM 6.5 on my HD!
After reading more reviews and videos:
I’m considering.....
Now:
Is it a question? Of course, yes!
Can't wait for delivery.
It is too big IMHO.HD is perfect sized.
But the capacitive screen and the Snapdragon are so attractive...
It's a hard choice
The faster CPU, multitouch (FINALLY) and the bigger screen make me find it worth the upgrade.
As for WM6.5 on the HD, ok, it works, but the HD is still, as it always was, underpowered for such a big display.
Only under the best and freshest of circumstances does it run smooth.
The new gen CPU should change this considerably.
And get ready, my supplier states HD2 to be deliverable on the 6th!
ASK768 said:
ill skip it for winmo 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will have to 2nd that.
Have chosen Option 4.
More CPU Power is good but it is too big now (Not a problem though) and the removal of the front cam and stylus is really bad.
Better camera software is needed and flash should be better.
just to post a quote from msmobiles
Edward J. R. said:
HTC made it: thanks to their big investment in research and development, they are the first to release Windows Mobile phone with multitouch. But there is one big problem:
... namely, unlike Samsung, that is providing SDK for Samsung Windows Mobile phones to take advantage of accelerometer, compass, etc, HTC is not providing such SDK at all, what is a big problem in case of HTC HD2, as one of our readers have noticed:
* Whatever remains of the Windows Mobile community is going bonkers over the HTC HD2 and its hacked-in multi-touch support. Why in the world does this matter if third-party apps won't be able to use it? I'm sure we'll see community API efforts on XDA-Devs, just like for past HTC controls (circular controller, zoom bar, accelerometer, etc.), but that's not going to extend very far beyond XDA.
Obviously what's needed is first-party support from MS, but given that WM development on MS' part has been in a coma for several years, the next line is the OEM, and HTC's support would be quite useful to build a collection of third-party apps that actually make some use of the device.
People talk about matching the iPhone-- sure, the HD2's hardware is impressive, but given its likely software state, it'll be miles away from the iPhone in actual usefulness. Why care about a digital compass, accelerometer, or multi-touch that won't work in any third-party apps?
Conclusion: since HTC HD2 is extremely expensive, maybe users should wait for Windows Mobile 7 phones where third party developers will be able to take advantage of multitouch and compass? Or maybe HTC should wake up and provide SDK for their Windows Mobile phones at last?
Note: according to leaked specifications of Windows Mobile 7, HTC HD2 will not (!) be upgradeable to Windows Mobile 7.[/QUOTE)
Maybe yes, we should wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm really thinking about it, but i think i will wait for the next device announcement.
i guess it will have a smaller screen (capacitive also, maybe 3.8?) with snapdragon 1ghz processor and QWERTY keyboard.
that's what i need
Yes - the Touch HD's poor processor is annoying me everyday. It can't even handle predictive text when sending an SMS in a timely fashion.
It was great at the time, but it's now time for the HD2.
i would skip because i already spent a fortune on hd so it should atleast last another year...
but the snapdragon and capacitive touchscreen really makes you drool
Thought about upgrading, but then it's a really expensive phone that only corrects the HD shortcoming (power, speed, camera, capacitive...)
I will wait for the next generation of devices, and an OLED screen before I upgrade. The next question for me will be to decide between Android v2.0 (it's now only starting to become a real alternative to winmo if the Exchange support is done correctly), and Windows Mobile 7.0
Frankly at the minute, from what I see of WinMo 7, I am not impressed at all...
hi all
I'm curious that what can Leo do? After a lot of video of it to show how it's great..where are the strengths and weaknesses of it? Is it a really smart phone?
Thank for your all care!
there are plenty of reviews on the internet, read them.
oh and it is really a smartphone just like almost all listed on this forum
tibursio said:
there are plenty of reviews on the internet, read them.
oh and it is really a smartphone just like almost all listed on this forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it..I'm searching all the information about it every my free time then..but what I want here is can Leo have got some smart function like Iphone?
oh dear...
mrkyo said:
I know it..I'm searching all the information about it every my free time then..but what I want here is can Leo have got some smart function like Iphone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
care to explain what a smart function is
Yes what can it actually do?
HTC has blown us bigtime again.
It can´t do enything you expect it to do, exept looking really nice.
HTC cant expect us to always relly on XDA all the time.
This whole scenario reminds me of "the blackstone affair".
When I bought the blackstone I was convinced, after reading almost everything there were to read about it, it was the best phone ever made.
I was convinced this community would fix every flaw.
Everyboy just assumed the xda devs would fix things.
Ok, XDA have made blackstone better that it was at first, but its not the killerphone
I was expecting it to be.
Now after reading about Leo I get the same fealing.
I mean, were is the native multitouch support. I have read posts were people just assume xda will get that. It still have a GPS-lag. No USB-host, wich everyone seam to just say: XDA will get that. It wont! It is just too hard and to time consuming.
So what can Leo do, except look good?
For 700 euro I had expected a lot more!
You cant get everything in one phone "master" daniel....
janne303 said:
You cant get everything in one phone "master" daniel....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know and it makes med sad.
I have bean in this buying coma and just got woken up,
and realised I cant get everything in one phone, if I chose to buy a
HTC phone...
But how come a phone with killer hardware still havent got more to offer,
when both samsung and toshiba G01 has more things to make use of the
hardware?
So what can it do? What use do I have of Leos hardware?
I think this is a nice thread with a good topic.
then don't buy a Leo, simple huh?
Toshiba TG01 lags, care to explain me why? Yet it has the same processor as the HD2. So what is the use of the hardware there (same question)? Same thing on the samsung. Every phone has a fault or something that won't make everyone happen, that's just how it is.
No manufacturer will ever make a phone with everything in it, it's not just HTC that does this. It shouldn't make you sad either, you would do the same if you ran that company, otherwise would bring them about ruin
dont confuse HTC with windows, and iPhone with its respected OS..
HTC made this phone, made a monster, whether it does everything you want or not, its personal opinion, but HTC did make a phone, not the operating system, which is where we get to Windows Mobile, with that OS it depends on the people who make programs for each phone, but we have a ton of windows mobile devices, where each one should have its software designed for it. Now i agree with u, Windows Mobile didnt give us unlimited app's options, they left a big part of that in the hands of other programmers, which is why we are all here on XDA
The iPhone on the other hand, they made the 3 versions of the phone, with all the app's, and then released it, even tho around 90% of the apps are a joke that u install 1 time, play with it for 5 minutes and uninstall it, its still a huge amount of applications.
So you cant really ask if the HD2 can do what the iPhone does, it just takes time for the developers take that "everything i want" and put it into each program
edit: (and i really had to do this ): Dont ask what the Leo can do for you, ask what you can do for your Leo!
^Well said! and great expression 'Dont ask what the Leo can do for you, ask what you can do for your Leo' LOL
ibsa03 said:
edit: (and i really had to do this ): Dont ask what the Leo can do for you, ask what you can do for your Leo!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you are right
ibsa03 said:
Dont ask what the Leo can do for you, ask what you can do for your Leo!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I expect my phone to be useful to me, not the other way round.
Oh, don't worry, it will be usefull.
Only problem will be could you use all of it's potentials... and find a way to do that...
Gaining post count
Well, seems to me new users badly need postcounts to get a free HSPL when the time comes.
Someone said, ..O dear... (that what spot on)
For the rest, if people really want 1 device that can do it all, buy
the HTC Shift.
This Hybrid OS device does everything from detecting Higgs particles to transdimensional teleportation, GSM calling and Windows 7 / Windows Mobile 6.1 with HDSPA and builtin stereo speakers and then some.
First impressions...
Ok, here some first user experience after half a day:
PRO's:
- The screen is HUGE!
- Flat device
- New TouchFlo + "multitouch" (only zooming), pressuresensitive
- Most applications and functions are fingerfriendly
- Fast(er than Topaz). See my new benchmark thread
- Led flash (not very good, but better than nothing)
- Much program memory 336 Mb
- Flat leather case, simpel but usefull I think
- 3,5 mm connection
- New micro-usb connection (is that a pro?)
CON's:
- The device is huge! To be honest I was a bit shocked when I first saw it. It's very "wide"...
- My first impression is that the screen is good but no better than the (small) Topaz screen
- Storage memory is low, only 183 Mb
- No stylus! At the moment a big issue for me. Not everything is fingerfriendly, so much frustration. Scrolling is hell! CERTAINLY AN ISSUE BECAUSE THE SCREEN DOESN'T RESPOND ON A STYLUS OR OTHER SHARP OBJECT!!! Hope I will get used to this soon.
- Camera sticks out. The camrea sticks out of the back of the device so the device rests on the silver edges of the camera. Not good for the silver, not good for the camera.
All in all it's impressive...!
Report later when I'm a bit more used to it.
(My Topaz screen look sooooo small now.....)
I completly agree with ETHANIAs first post.
There is also one BIG CON:
"Pretty much all videos under 720p played just fine without any dropped frames. The HTC HD2 has similar issues as Acer neoTouch and has even worse performance. While the neoTouch managed to play the 720p videos with 15-17 fps, the HD2 has an output of only 12-13 frames per second. Not that any of those is actually watchable but it gives you an idea. We guess the graphics subsystem of the Acer neoTouch has a few tricks under its sleeve and it's not a matter of pure CPU clock comparison."
taken from: http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_hd2-review-415p3.php
and i should pay 700€ for this???
Sorry, not me!
6ak said:
I completly agree with ETHANIAs first post.
There is also one BIG CON:
"Pretty much all videos under 720p played just fine without any dropped frames. The HTC HD2 has similar issues as Acer neoTouch and has even worse performance. While the neoTouch managed to play the 720p videos with 15-17 fps, the HD2 has an output of only 12-13 frames per second. Not that any of those is actually watchable but it gives you an idea. We guess the graphics subsystem of the Acer neoTouch has a few tricks under its sleeve and it's not a matter of pure CPU clock comparison."
taken from: http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_hd2-review-415p3.php
and i should pay 700€ for this???
Sorry, not me!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder why you even bother to write this. By now we all know HTC won't do anything with this type of comment.
Nice to share but if you don't want it (don't you?), just don't buy it. Indeed it saves you 700 euro. (by the way in Holland they are cheaper...).
And I am a happy owner.
pietrucci said:
I wonder why you even bother to write this. By now we all know HTC won't do anything with this type of comment.
Nice to share but if you don't want it (don't you?), just don't buy it. Indeed it saves you 700 euro. (by the way in Holland they are cheaper...).
And I am a happy owner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have TOUCH HD and i am dissapointed with it. Yes you are right, i really dont think to buy it (not yet ). I wish you luck with yours HD 2.
Any link for buying in Holland?