Database Users

1.6 GHz Overclock

Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.

omg!
(yeah, that's about all I have to say)

I believe I read somewhere that they were gonna do a captivate specific ROM via bionix. Pretty sure it is for 2.1, linpack is @12 MFLOPS and open GL site shows it on 2.1.-impressive? Yes . Can't say that I wouldnt take it for a spin though. Hopefully 2.2 will soon follow
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, with the back panel on the Captivate being metal, you might burn your hand with this setup.

kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

designgears said:
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came buckets

Dg do you have your hand in this cookie jar as well? Can we expect an overclocked version of cog 10? Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

I'll pretty sure they're gonna make z4mod their base. They're also going to implement led button notifications (;
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Yup its real his name is morfic. I briefly saw him and unhelpful chatting about it. I cant believe this thing is stable... only bad side is that it only runs eclair till we get source for froyo kernel.

Man I've been wanting to push this badboy past 1.2 ghz

Stable and tentative... Could see 1800! I was just thinking today (with the droid oc and all) when another one would come our way. I guess it was just a matter of time. And boy did it ever come!! Great thing is there is already plans to bring it our way
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

I wanna see the screen shot with them running "quadrant advanced" to see the cpu score!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This one is Cognition 8.1 with z4mod.

Damn!!! I just read it as well, cant wait to give it a spin some day

if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.

Kaik541 said:
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my phone doesn't run well with a simple 1.2 GHz OC... so I'm skeptical of a stable 1.6 OC kernel.
Quadrant is just terrible. Any comparison scores should be taken using Advanced with the I/O test subtracted. But, even then, it only scores Qualcomm MSM processors "correctly."

Kaik541 said:
if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/

WickedStyx said:
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, but I never questioned the FPS cap, I have no idea what affects that so I can't question it. besides, it's not like our eyes can see much more than 30 FPS, so the difference between 60 FPS and 78 FPS means little to me (in day to day usage). also, I never said anything about undervolting either or made a comment about the 1.2 GHz overclock. Mine runs fine with a 1.2 GHz overclock and the hummingbird processor has already been theorized to be stable up to 1.6 GHz, so this isn't really news, just the first time someone is advertising it as fully implemented. and, what stable means, is it runs across all the devices without things like the "sleep of death" effect occuring (which still happened for SOME with the 1.2 GHz OC).
so until I can personally see 1.6 GHz on my phone without any ill effects on battery life (which should only be minimal if the CPU is being scaled dynamically) or sleep death effects, I won't make a judgment... which is what I already said

This is awesome though! Woot woot!
Who needs a Galaxy S 2 with this?
2GHZ OC here we come!

Will hopefully find out soon a dl link for the vibrant ROM is in new thread "Manhattan project." Viral black posted that they have a Captivate but will try to port to every sgs variant possible. Captivate will be 2nd I would suppose. Sombionix did say they were working on a 2.2 ROM, so hopefully this will meet froyo in the not so distant future. It seemed to be working well from the posts that I read. Then again it is still early.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Can be downloaded now:
"Manhattan Project"
http://www.teamwhiskey.com/home/downloads

Nexus S quadrant score

Looks like google got JIT situated on hummingbird CPU
sorry crappy screen haven't unlocked boot loader yet
Now off to unlock to help out with system dump
So dev can try to port
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

This is awesome news as long as we can get GB ported

What does the blue portion of the bar represent?

blanked said:
What does the blue portion of the bar represent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU. That's what was lagging with the current froyo builds. The JIT compiler was optimized for QCOM chips, but not the Hummingbird processor. Looks like that's been sorted out.

Is that available only in the pro version (I don't get the colors just one solid bar)? What is green and how come Droix X kicks so much butt with it? Memory?

g1ddy said:
Is that available only in the pro version? What is green and how come Droix X kicks so much butt with it? Memory?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blue CPU/Red Memory/Green I/O/Grayish Yellow 2D/Yellow 3D

SO WANT those speeds...

Considering we're running the same processor...can't wait!

Awesome. Dump!Dump!
Don't blame me, blame my keyboard's autocorrection algorithm.

This was linked to the Vibrant section, and noticed the lower (smaller block) on 3D performance? Can anyone confirm?
edit: damn thought this was the Nexus S section, lol.

RobBull69 said:
The CPU. That's what was lagging with the current froyo builds. The JIT compiler was optimized for QCOM chips, but not the Hummingbird processor. Looks like that's been sorted out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the test breakdown is available in Quadrant Advanced. you can get it in the SlideME market.
and the green represent I/O which doesnt really contribute to a lot of performance... you will notice that people running OCLF will have quadrants score of 2k+ mainly due to i/o exploit

what's the linpack on it?

THIS IS EXACTLY what I have been waiting for! I have been one of the most vocal people about the Dalvik Jit Compiler not offering the Hummingbird the same performance gain that scorpions received, and it seems like Google definitely sorted this out. Totally just put new life into the Hummingbird. Google choosing the Samsung Galaxy S as being their new Nexus phone was the best thing that happened to Vibrant owners.

Thats just a little higher than my Vibrant with Voodoo Lagfix. Which means thats its either 'meh', or if its getting the result without being I/O lagfixed, then... 'WOW!'

Mannymal said:
Thats just a little higher than my Vibrant with Voodoo Lagfix. Which means thats its either 'meh', or if its getting the result without being I/O lagfixed, then... 'WOW!'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus S doesn't use RFS, so there's no need for a lagfix in the same sense as the Galaxy S phones. However, Google did neglect to set one of the EXT4 mount options, so there is a Voodoo kernel now that shows significant improvement. They're getting around 2400 with the new kernel. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=876132

you can get the same thing on a SGS with the CM6.1beta

I played with one for a short time at Best Buy tonight. It is ridiculously fast. It loaded Angry Birds loaded and ready to play in the same time it took my phone (running Eugene's Ginger Clone 2.2 with the super I/O kernel) to bring up the loading screen. I understand the browser still has some of the same lag problems, but I didn't get to play with it long enough to see for myself.
If devs can port the 2.3 kernel to the Vibrant, then I'll stick with it because it will indeed gain what this phone can do, but If now then I think I'll get the Nexus S. The fact that Google took Samsung's hardware and made it sing like this and Samsung can't even manage a workable 2.2 yet has me seriously contemplating jumping ship. I don't think I'll sell the Vibrant though, the community and developers have been great and I want to see exactly how far they can push the phone, but it'd be nice to daily drive something you know is fully supported.

Mannymal said:
Thats just a little higher than my Vibrant with Voodoo Lagfix. Which means thats its either 'meh', or if its getting the result without being I/O lagfixed, then... 'WOW!'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey mannymal, I think you fail to see the point and significance of this. The total end score isn't what we are excited about, at least not me. The cpu score is what we are excited about, and you can only see the score breakdown in Quadrant Advanced or Quadrant Professional.
The dalvik jit compiler in froyo 2.2 was not giving the hummingbird the same CPU performance gain that was being achieved by the scorpion chips. Meaning that a crummy old first generation scorpion was outperforming the hummingbird in cpu tasks.
The significance of this thread and the quadrant photo, shows that Google appears to have hopefully sorted things out, and that the Hummingbird is now receiving a CPU performance gain that was being partially neglected in 2.2
I hope you realize the end score wasn't the focus, and that no matter how many lagfixes you apply, your cpu performance doesn't necessarily go up.

Is that all? Very low score! I was expecting better than this for a Nexus S ..

scrizz said:
you can get the same thing on a SGS with the CM6.1beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But sure, I get the same score with my SGS Quadrant XXJPY and LagFix!

Highest Galaxy S benchmark ever.

Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My god.... How the heck did you do it?

Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).

The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4

I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...

rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:

theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.

rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)

theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?

I made this score

Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^

Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..

So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

edited
10 chars

coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).

Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry

Nexus S is still King!

heres an article from androidcommunity.com http://androidcommunity.com/nexus-s...nce-benchmarks-with-trinity-and-cm7-20110530/
the way i see it, the real winner here is Trinity and our own morfic(@morfique on twitter) as Trinity for the g2x and for the nexus s is on top for both phones.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Are there other comparison benchmarks beside Quadrant? I take quadrant scores about as seriously as stories from AboveTopSecret
Also, overclocking to 1.5ghz.. What do the dual cores do when overclocked? Where are those comparisons?
Also.. Really.. Is a 1.5ghz overclock really an "every day use" type of configuration?
I'm not saying this isn't impressive but you're comparing a Mustang with a racing kit in it to it to a stock Camaro.

styckx said:
Are there other comparison benchmarks beside Quadrant? I take quadrant scores about as seriously as stories from AboveTopSecret
Also, overclocking to 1.5ghz.. What do the dual cores do when overclocked?
Also.. Really.. Is a 1.5ghz overclock really an "every day use" type of configuration?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heres a smartbench benchmark. and no, 1.5ghz isnt a daily. its more to play with or use when gaming. as you can imagine, battery life wouldnt be the greatest. i use the Trinity 1.1ghz UV as my daily. oh, and the top g2x(dual core) quadrant benchmark is 5587, also using trinity but for the g2x. btw, thats morfics g2x with the top g2x score.

Gotcha.. Don't get me wrong.. It is impressive and I'm all about getting the most out of hardware whether it's from a phone or a PC.

Damn. Now that is impressive. I wonder what the 3D score will be like once they o overclock it. It's going to be awesome!!!!

Most of it is coming from I/O due to ext4, quadrant benchmarks are far from accurate. Anything higher then 2000 (maybe less) is SF.
Dual core phones are definitely better, as well as their GPUs. I can run most of the tegra 2 games just fine tho.

look at that I/O score clearly nexus s it king
1.5 on single core is not faster than 1ghz dual core
Sgs2 ATM is best android out...period it doesn't need ext4 exploit to score 4700 on quadrant
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

lvnatic said:
Most of it is coming from I/O due to ext4, quadrant benchmarks are far from accurate. Anything higher then 2000 (maybe less) is SF.
Dual core phones are definitely better, as well as their GPUs. I can run most of the tegra 2 games just fine tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Sgx540 beats the Geforce ulp gpu in the Tegra 2.
So there is no reason that it wouldn't work.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

not saying its not impressive...your CPU OC is impressive that's about it
And only seen a handful of nexus S that can handle these speeds so to say nexus s is still king based on this is laughable im sorry thats my opinion
cant believe androidcommunity made an article on this
also removing the FPS cap on the kernel doesn't do anything for games the screen refresh rate cant handle such high FPS so you dont even see these extra frames when gaming all you're doing is killing your battery
tegra 2 dual core has a huge advantage on gaming.
Just becasue you gain a better score on a benchmark the tegra has an extra core to take some of workload in 3d rendering thats why games like Riptide run great on tegra and slow on our sgx540
im not bashing you simms i respect you and everything you do for the community just think you have a misunderstanding how things are working

demo23019 said:
im not bashing you simms i respect you and everything you do for the community just think you have a misunderstanding how things are working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope that you dont think that i think that a quadrant is an accurate snapshot of this situation, because i dont. quadrant is only meant to benchmark a single core, it even makes the field even between single and dual cores because of that. but, since the community likes to use quadrant as a "standard" for benching, ill throw these benchmarks up to look at. kinda like looking at a freak of nature, not being able to take your eyes off. anyways, since people like to use quadrants to compare android penises, the nexus s has the biggest(for now).

I get what you're saying and were you're coming from. I wont but in anymore enjoy you 1.5ghz wish my phone could run that speed
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Quandrant scores are not a good way to judge device performance. This article explains it all:
http://www.androidcentral.com/how-cheat-android-benchmarks
As the article explains, the big give away is the length of the I/O part of the bar in the OP picture, which shows that the phone has manipulated quadrant benchmark into providing a higher score.
It is still pretty neat to see a +5000 quadrant score, even if it doesn't really mean much.

Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw

lvnatic said:
Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anything higher than 1800-2000 is a fake score??? then you havent ever been oc'ed to 1.3ghz.. never. btw, at stock speeds you should be getting 2300-2600. what phone are you using? my oc'ed original droid gets 1800-2100

lvnatic said:
Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those scores are not faked although I do understand that quadrant is not the best barometer for benchmarking. On my Nexus S, stock, I get around 2100. With my G2x, stock, I get about 2700 (and that's mounted on the crappy ext3 filesystem). When using an ext4 kernel my score jumps to 3500.

demo23019 said:
look at that I/O score clearly nexus s it king
1.5 on single core is not faster than 1ghz dual core
Sgs2 ATM is best android out...period it doesn't need ext4 exploit to score 4700 on quadrant
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A point of correction. The SGS2 out of the box is mounted as ext4, which is why it scores great on Quadrant. It's also clocked @ 1.2ghz. 4700 is a bit high for a stock SGS2, its typically around 3700 which is certainly nothing to sneeze out.

Evo Shift 4G benchmark CONTEST - lets get this "best kernel" debate out of the way

Evo Shift 4G benchmark CONTEST - lets get this "best kernel" debate out of the way
Who can beat my Antutu (benchmark program available in market) record?
CM7 nightly, min cpu 1900 mhz, max cpu 1900mhz, Toasty gov, hardware version 0004.
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Will post more detailed specs later.
If you're getting over 4000, you're doing it right.
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty (or performance gov depending on kernel) for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.

I actually just beat my record.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I haven't ran it yet with the new pershoot, i get better scores with scary. But I'm still a pershoot fan but for all who care I do (ill test the new pershoot later) get better scores with scary
Teleported from my Shifty Speedy using Tapatalk

we now bow to the master

leadfoot99 said:
we now bow to the master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, you are limited to five thanks per day.
BTW you are running a really old version of Antutu. Latest version is 2.3.1

that was an old score

246 views, 2 replies. Sad.
I thought you all had more balls than that.

Well there is no real best kernel. Its preference and they also act different on different phones.
Sent from my Supreme Shift Minimally!

Just hearing excuses, no numbers.

You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

..........................double post

strapped365 said:
You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.

VICODAN said:
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel

notsointeresting said:
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
In computing, FLOPS (or flops or flop/s, for floating point operations per second) is a measure of a computer's performance, especially in fields of scientific calculations that make heavy use of floating point calculations, similar to the older, simpler, instructions per second. Since the final S stands for "second", conservative speakers consider "FLOPS" as both the singular and plural of the term, although the singular "FLOP" is frequently encountered. Alternatively, the singular FLOP (or flop) is used as an abbreviation for "FLoating-point OPeration", and a flop count is a count of these operations (e.g., required by a given algorithm or computer program). In this context, "flops" is simply the plural rather than a rate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

stock
Stock rooted 2.2 @806 also. 2331

VICODAN said:
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense

notsointeresting said:
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?

doublepost

VICODAN said:
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones

notsointeresting said:
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I thought the Shift had a multi threaded processor, dual core or not. Interesting. Thanks for your numbers.