Stock browser a disgrace in JP6 - Galaxy S I9000 General

I don't what terrible things Samsung has done to it but it´s very nasty downgrade from 2.1.
Everything lags, scrolling isn't smooth.. back to JM9

Gingerbred said:
I don't what terrible things Samsung has done to it but it´s very nasty downgrade from 2.1.
Everything lags, scrolling isn't smooth.. back to JM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a full wipe, and wipe cache in the recovery mode.

Completely agree. Browser lags -A LOT- while trying to scroll.
And there seems to be no button to disable flash from loading (flash seems to be what is slowing the browser down)
I did a factory reset + reformatted SD cards before installing JP6.

Browser is worse than Eclair indeed. Something must be done about this.

Back button is the same as before: simply use the standard back button on the phone.
To make Flash content load only after you click on it: go to settings, choose Enable plug-ins and select On demand.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

pmos69 said:
To make Flash content load only after you click on it: go to settings, choose Enable plug-ins and select On demand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, thanks. That actually smoothened the scrolling experience a bit too, it's still worse than on 2.1 though.

Try this:
- close the browser
- open pocketnow.com
- after it loaded, scroll a bit
- now look in task manager
With plugins disabled the browser took only more than 130 mb for just one opened page.
Of course launcher, live wallpapers, etc were killed due insufficient ram.
Free available ram + browser = perfect combo. Gg google & samsung. Great relase :angry:

That...is absolutely ridiculous, I just tested on jpa, 124mb used for pocketnow.com followed by a fc and memory dump
This froyo is not release worthy...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

wow, so it's a froyo thing? My droid X browser with froyo is NOT smooth at all while my vibrant and fascinate running 2.1 are smooth as silk!!!

android53 said:
That...is absolutely ridiculous, I just tested on jpa, 124mb used for pocketnow.com followed by a fc and memory dump
This froyo is not release worthy...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's strange pocketnow in JM9 only used 29 Mb. The problem must be flash related.

There is a memory leak in the leaked version of 2.2 for the Captivate which is what was causing the browser lag. I'm hoping this is not the case for your I9000's as this was supposed to be fixed before release and does not bode well for the release version of the captivate. However, it may be something to look into.

comfirmed, huge memory leak with the browser.
experience not smooth at all on JP6 with the stock browser (pocketnow.com)

Will.1 said:
comfirmed, huge memory leak with the browser.
experience not smooth at all on JP6 with the stock browser (pocketnow.com)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you confirm it.. In my experience, most people who "confirm" memory leaks have "confirmed" it using VERY sketchy evidence. It reminds me of the time a bunch of people "confirmed" firefox was leaking, and showed "proof". Problem is, it was wrong (and every developer knew it). Unfortunately, the crowd these days seems to hear the word "memory leak"., and be instantly biased.
Firstly, people should set addons to load "on demand" (its in settings). Secondly, ensure you have wiped the caches and reset to factory settings (if you aren't using Kies to upgrade). Because it's certainly fine here.. After you have done both of these things, then return, and comment on how they went.
I find it impressive how effortless it is to set you guys off though on angry rants, without having all the facts.

Man.. I've already wiped right after update. Also I've tested with plugins off and on demand. with flash always on is worse.
Just try it.

Zvenn said:
Completely agree. Browser lags -A LOT- while trying to scroll.
And there seems to be no button to disable flash from loading (flash seems to be what is slowing the browser down)
I did a factory reset + reformatted SD cards before installing JP6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The browser in my n1 seems quite sluggish at times too... don't be so quick to blame Samsung for that IMO.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App

How much crap are you running in the background? All I'm running is Launcherpro, Jabberoid.
And the Froyo browser feels to me as fast as the Eclair one.. Neither are blitzing, but it isn't bad here..

andrewluecke said:
How did you confirm it.. In my experience, most people who "confirm" memory leaks have "confirmed" it using VERY sketchy evidence. It reminds me of the time a bunch of people "confirmed" firefox was leaking, and showed "proof". Problem is, it was wrong (and every developer knew it). Unfortunately, the crowd these days seems to hear the word "memory leak"., and be instantly biased.
Firstly, people should set addons to load "on demand" (its in settings). Secondly, ensure you have wiped the caches and reset to factory settings (if you aren't using Kies to upgrade). Because it's certainly fine here.. After you have done both of these things, then return, and comment on how they went.
I find it impressive how effortless it is to set you guys off though on angry rants, without having all the facts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny, sounds like you just went off on an angry rant and also didn't seem to have any facts showing that there isn't a memory leak.
If you read the stuff from the developers in the Captivate section, it is widely known that there is a browser leak with the new update. Granted, ours was a leaked version, but it's real none the less. I'm not saying that is definitely the problem here, but based on the facts of what we have with the captivate, it is certainly something to look at.
Yes, everyone has already tried setting addons to "on demand", even turned them off completely and wiped the caches and reset back to factory settings, all of that is old news. There is even a thread posted specifically trying to address this problem.

andrewluecke said:
How much crap are you running in the background? All I'm running is Launcherpro, Jabberoid.
And the Froyo browser feels to me as fast as the Eclair one.. Neither are blitzing, but it isn't bad here..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even without any apps opened the browser is simply awful.
also it takes extra cpu too. Try listening to music while browsing.
... Very annoying

andrewluecke you must have a different sgs than the rest of us. No matter if we speak about gps, lags or browser problems, you always come here to say that the problem isnt so bad,people tends to exagerate or samsung is not doing things so wrong.
Sorry but are you working for samsung or u just have a Samsung Galaxy S 2.0? Because its really difficult to find someone that deffends so much samsung or question so much the complains of the users...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

I get 100mb ram usage and FC's using Xscope & 117mb Dolphin on pocketnow.com.

Related

My SGS Experience and some queries

Hello everybody,
I didn't think I'd be writing this thread. I mean, owning a SGS is a dream come true for me. But I came to know that the reality is not as good as my dream.
First, let me start with the PLUS/Advantages
--> Obviously, the best screen I've ever seen till date.
--> Feels very thing and light, though a bit large, definitely its pocketable and handy (IMHO).
--> Android 2.1 interface rocks! Superb Visuals unlike iOS and very user friendly.
--> Android Market
--> Superb Default Browser
-->Very Very Responsive, just like the iphone.
--> Great hardware - Still couldn't belie it is able to play 720p videos with more than 6mbps bitrate.
--> Excellent Video camera - 720p video recording is so cool!
--> Excellent NIGHT mode!
--> Dedicated SGS section at XDA
Now, the MINUSes/ Disadvantages.
--> Initially I thought, only the lack of flash and the iphone like model are the only bad things about this phone.
--> LAG, LAG, LAG, LAG! As the usage days increases, the lag increases gradually. And I'm unable to get rid of the lag.
And what's most annoying is that, even the telephony and messaging application is lagging (android could've atleast reserved some permanent resources for both of these apps, as they are the ACTUAL PHONE apps.)
--> Battery - Still I'm not sure whether it is a good battery or not. But I'm definitely disappointed. All of my friends used to have a probem with their smartphone, if they use the features of their phone, the battery won't even last a day. But before buying SGS, I read in various reviews about its great battery life. So I thought, I can use all the features of this phone and it'll last atleast a day or more. But if I use the features of this phone, then battery won't even last for a day. But if I use it like a normal phone, the battery is good (But who wants that? I need to use those features, that's why I've put so much money into this box )
--> Samsung. I guess I'll be stuck with what I have. No official updates, no fixes, no nothing.
P.S: If any one of you can help me out with my problems with LAG and share some tips on battery improvement, IT'D BE GR8!! (Of course, I did see the threads regarding tips, but still...)
lag fix
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=724251
Battery
Fully charge battery, then use it until it is completely discharged, recharge fully, that is one cycle.
After you have done five complete cycles your battery should be conditioned and give you longer between charges.
My phone lasted about 8 hours when I first got it, after three cycles it's now lasting 24 hours between charges.
Hope that helps.
Geryatrix said:
Battery
Fully charge battery, then use it until it is completely discharged, recharge fully, that is one cycle.
After you have done five complete cycles your battery should be conditioned and give you longer between charges.
My phone lasted about 8 hours when I first got it, after three cycles it's now lasting 24 hours between charges.
Hope that helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? i can't believe this.
I have used my phone for 2 weeks. if I follow this procedure now, will it still work?
And thanks a lot, Geryatrix, for your your reply
@ AllGamer - Thanks for the link mate. I've seen that earlier, but I'm too noobish to try that out. I'm waiting for an OFFICIAL samsung firmware update. So that, if anything happens while updating that firmware, I could still claim my warranty
emmarbee said:
but I'm too noobish to try that out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just update your firmware to JM2 and all your lag problems will be gone. Seriously, i had 4 different firmwares and can honestly say, that JM2 is lag free. It also comes with a samsung provided task manager(long press home now includes a button to sammy task manager).
Updating firmware is so easy, and you can't brick your phone(honestly).
There's no harm in flashing, since there are now stock firmwares available, so you can go back if you want to return the phone in future. Why wait for the official update?
@buddy01 - thats very convincing. I'd like to do that. But this phone is my 3 month salary - I wouldn't dare to spoil it in anyway. Of course, it makes sense, when you say 'NO BRICK + REVERSIBLE FIRMWARE'... But still . . . .
BTW, is the thread mentioned by AllGamer ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=724251) is JM2 firmware??
emmarbee said:
BTW, is the thread mentioned by AllGamer ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=724251) is JM2 firmware??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that's the mimocan lag fix, which in my honest opinion is not needed anymore since JM2.
If i were you, i would just go with the JM2 and see if that's fast enough for you (is for me) and if not then try the lag fix.
All i can say is that im 99,9% sure you won't brick your phone if you flash your firmware like everyone else.
I am running JM2 with the lag fix. And my phone is still laggy as hell.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Filgaliel said:
I am running JM2 with the lag fix. And my phone is still laggy as hell.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be some crappy configuration, app, something messing it up. Mine is Flash Gordon fast. I don't know if the fact that i use launcherPro instead of Touch(lag)Wiz, make any difference. It might also be that something is changed in latest (JM1,JM2) firmwares in such a way that mimocan fix is actually a burden now. Who knows, but im lag free, honestly.
buddy01 said:
Must be some crappy configuration, app, something messing it up. Mine is Flash Gordon fast. I don't know if the fact that i use launcherPro instead of Touch(lag)Wiz, make any difference. It might also be that something is changed in latest (JM1,JM2) firmwares in such a way that mimocan fix is actually a burden now. Who knows, but im lag free, honestly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange. I too use Launcher Pro. What I experience is this.. I press to open an app.. The app starts to open but seems to freeze midway for a second or two, sometimes longer. Even when I try to enter the settings menu I get this lag.
Another strange thing is that sometimes when in an app the screen returns to home screen as if the back button has been pressed. I reenter the app but instantly I am returned to home screen. I try another app.. Same thing. Only when I turn the screen off and on again will I be able to open an app..
Very weird..
Filgaliel said:
Strange. I too use Launcher Pro. What I experience is this.. I press to open an app.. The app starts to open but seems to freeze midway for a second or two, sometimes longer. Even when I try to enter the settings menu I get this lag.
Another strange thing is that sometimes when in an app the screen returns to home screen as if the back button has been pressed. I reenter the app but instantly I am returned to home screen. I try another app.. Same thing. Only when I turn the screen off and on again will I be able to open an app..
Very weird..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is definetly wrong with your setup. i would do a factory reset and/or do the flashing again with re-partition and forget the lag fix.
Only app that takes 2 to 4 seconds to open in some occasions is gallery, and that is if i open it the first time (fresh boot or killed with task manager). everything else i commonly use, such as dialer one, handsentSMS, app draw, camera, gmail, market, youtube, browser, maps, contacts ... all open instantly.
The other problem your experiencing, i have never heard of. Must be some app acting wrong or things got messed up because of the mimocan fix. Honestly i would do a factory reset and then re-flash JM2 and forget the mimocan fix.
Yeah perhaps you´re right. I think I will.. Thanks.
Filgaliel said:
Yeah perhaps you´re right. I think I will.. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I repeated the procedure this time with mimocan fix on EXT4. I now rate 1592 in quadrant and the phone is smooth as hell..
I haven't tried mimocan fix yet sounded very good, but rather complicated and requires Odin's flashing the phone.
My current galaxy is rooted and I install AutoKiller to better manage the memories. So far so good, lag are kept at the minimal. This procedure to me is far simpler and give acceptable performance.
Mimocan is the most complicated because in addition to odin flashing the kernel (not the entire firmware), you must also partition an external sd card and make some changes to the filesystem with an terminal program.
Mimocan gives you the best quadrant score atm, but after seeing a video of it in work, i can without a doubt say that my phone is just as fast with the newest jm2 firmware only.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Ok then, I guess I have to go with jm2. Can you please tell me where can I get that firmware and a tutorial for that.
buddy01 said:
No, that's the mimocan lag fix, which in my honest opinion is not needed anymore since JM2.
If i were you, i would just go with the JM2 and see if that's fast enough for you (is for me) and if not then try the lag fix.
All i can say is that im 99,9% sure you won't brick your phone if you flash your firmware like everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9000. Dunno how to reply using xda app.
I won't be flashing jm 2 as of now as froyo is out and will be given officially in few months. till then I'll manage with this lag.

For those concerned about Vibrant's speed

I don't get it. I have compared my Vibrant to my Nexus one and 95% of the time the Vibrant is just as fast. Two exceptions, the market and speedtest.net app. Other than that, it flies! I will say before I did a hard reset the phone was in fact slow, it was a day and night difference after the reset. I get no lag, fast swipe through screens with TW launcher and apps open fast!
I have no lag that I can notice, but then again I don't bog my phones down with a ton of apps and games I will never use.
No lag. Stock rom, haven't factory resetted either. No GPS problems either without GPS fix o.0
Guess I was just lucky. I applied lag fix for the benchmarks for the hell of it though.
How speedy a device feels is very subjective and varies under different conditions.
I do have a Nexus One too ( in fact two) and in some respects it feels more responsive (mostly the menu, home, back and search button). Applications open faster as well.
Now, the comparison is not fair, ad the N1 is running Froyo and doesn't have the bloatware services installed by TMo (visual voicemail, my account, et al)
Browser and rendering speeds are much faster in the vibrant. Noticeably.
Download speed are much faster in the vibrant as well. Using Speedtest.net the vibrant scores 6 mbs vs 2 on the N1, same place, same time, same servers.
I think the biggest issue with the vibrant (other than the compass and the gps) is filesystem access, probablu due to using a large flash-based memory for storing apps.
I expect that when (if) the Froyo update arrives, the phone will fly.
In the meantime, and depending which apps people have installed and how they use the phone, some will continue to have better experiences with the N1, others with the vibrant.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I don't have an N1 to compare to, but, there was definitely a lag. Tolerable most of the time, but it would be completely frozen during a single install of an app from market. And don't get me started on a phone reboot. I wish I had timed it to be exact, but it must have been 5 entire minutes from reboot to when I could open and actually use the camera again to record something. Opera loads probably twice (maybe 2.5 times) as fast. Engadget would literally take 5 seconds to come up and at *least* 5 seconds *per page* to load, if not more. I would hit the arrow and have to wait..and wait..and wait. Now, I can hit the arrow repeatedly and it scrolls through news (both new and old)
Maybe not all phones lagged, but mine certainly did. Hope froyo helps some so I'm not forced to run a hack to get around poor rfs performance (or whatever it is).
zephiK said:
No lag. Stock rom, haven't factory resetted either. No GPS problems either without GPS fix o.0
Guess I was just lucky. I applied lag fix for the benchmarks for the hell of it though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would really like to know when people without gps or speed problems got their phones. I bought mine the 19th of July from costco.
Also, the, "take off all your apps and games you don't use regularly. Don't use any widgets on your screens. Don't use all 7 screens for apps or widgets" comments are counterproductive. The phone was DESIGNED for this kind of use and if it doesn't perform as designed. Well, that's a problem.
One more thing - people like me who post about perceived problems are not HATERS. I love the phone and its potential with future upgrades to the software and firmware. That's why I come to this forum, to gets thoughts from the android community. Besides, if everyone who loved the phone and had zero problems with it posted all the time there would be no room for those of us seeking advice.
After youtube vid by AKASKRILLER IM ROOTED DID LAGFIX IN 10MINS W/NO PC NOW IM BENCHIN 2100+........HELLLA FASSST
Sent from my ROOTED VIBRANT BENCHIN 2100 using XDA App
I see what you did there...
Sent from mah fone.
LAG FIX IN 10MINS........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dSg3qsD7QQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my ROOTED WARRIORusing XDA App
I wanted to say that I did the lag fix via the update.zip method and everything flies now including the Geniewidget which would rarely load articles. Samsung needs to or has fixed this (not sure, we don't know until we get an official update) but.. I can use the TWLauncher now.
Coming from a G1 I don't see any lag compared to what I was used to. Running Launcher Pro I personally feel its a bit smoother than TW 3.0, but still works perfectly fine for me.
I often wonder if people just look for something to tweak because they simply can't leave things alone and constantly want to improve because they simply can.
kizer said:
Coming from a G1 I don't see any lag compared to what I was used to. Running Launcher Pro I personally feel its a bit smoother than TW 3.0, but still works perfectly fine for me.
I often wonder if people just look for something to tweak because they simply can't leave things alone and constantly want to improve because they simply can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is some lag that was very noticeable which happened every time you tried to use the market place and some random apps(the market was faster on my mt3g before the lag fix), after the lag fix the loading screen is gone if not instant.
Just did this update and I went from 983 to 2187! Awesome difference!
kizer said:
Coming from a G1 I don't see any lag compared to what I was used to. Running Launcher Pro I personally feel its a bit smoother than TW 3.0, but still works perfectly fine for me.
I often wonder if people just look for something to tweak because they simply can't leave things alone and constantly want to improve because they simply can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same story for me. I've never seen this lag that everyone is talking about (except for the one person that mentioned some lag when installing apps - EVERY Android phone lags for a few seconds while an app is installing). I run the standard TW home and rooted and uninstalled a few of the bloatware apps I'd never use. Don't really see any reason to do the "lag fix".

What is "lag", and how does it present itself?

Ok, so stock Vibrant "lag". What does this mean, precisely? I'm a rooted but otherwise stock JI6, and I don't see any lag anywhere on the phone.
If I were to be experiencing this lag, what would it look like?
keenerb said:
Ok, so stock Vibrant "lag". What does this mean, precisely? I'm a rooted but otherwise stock JI6, and I don't see any lag anywhere on the phone.
If I were to be experiencing this lag, what would it look like?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get Xscope V5 (V6 is buggy) browser for free x-labs.net and use it for a day or two. Notice how slow it loads webpages sometimes. Or try Miui Browser (not in market) GUI lags a little too
The LAG that most people are talking about is when you switch windows or open a new app. Sometimes when doing this, the phone will seem to freeze for a moment before going to the new app or page.
With Voodoo lagfix, I have not seen this happen once, where with stock it happened all the time.
If you have rooted your phone and gone down the mod rabbit hole, lagfix is well worth it.
I installed a LagFix recently like I did months ago and saw no huge change in performance (barely any change really) This "lag" problem is about as overblown as it could be. Firefox runs as smoothly as it can (it's not that smooth, beta and needs 40MB of ram on my phone. JFD firmware was did have some lag issues though that we're a problem. Some serious lag was solved by a factory reset or by reloading the OS. The lagfix isn't worth the reduced app space or lesser reliability. If you have no problems with how your phone is running, don't bother with any hacks like that.
Some people randomly got major lag when updating from JFD to JI6. A data wipe solves it.. and they couldn't be happier.
The 'lag' that you see people complaining about does not happen on all phones, all the time.
And I need to remind you to be careful about installing any lagfix. Read up on what it does and how it may affect your phone BEFORE installing it.
Raistline said:
The LAG that most people are talking about is when you switch windows or open a new app. Sometimes when doing this, the phone will seem to freeze for a moment before going to the new app or page.
With Voodoo lagfix, I have not seen this happen once, where with stock it happened all the time.
If you have rooted your phone and gone down the mod rabbit hole, lagfix is well worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, you might think the phone is fast now but when you install the lag fix you'll definately notice a difference.
It amazed me when I had to go back to stock (after soft bricking my phone) and I had to install rom manager from the market while everything was stock and it was crazy how slow it was.
heygrl said:
I installed a LagFix recently like I did months ago and saw no huge change in performance (barely any change really) This "lag" problem is about as overblown as it could be. Firefox runs as smoothly as it can (it's not that smooth, beta and needs 40MB of ram on my phone. JFD firmware was did have some lag issues though that we're a problem. Some serious lag was solved by a factory reset or by reloading the OS. The lagfix isn't worth the reduced app space or lesser reliability. If you have no problems with how your phone is running, don't bother with any hacks like that.
Some people randomly got major lag when updating from JFD to JI6. A data wipe solves it.. and they couldn't be happier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gonma take our two vibrants to tmo and use my camcorder to rexord us using different phones after fresh reboots soon to shut up idiots like u.
The lag issue is far from overblown.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
N8ter said:
Gonma take our two vibrants to tmo and use my camcorder to rexord us using different phones after fresh reboots soon to shut up idiots like u.
The lag issue is far from overblown.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N8ter is a troll, just read their posts. Where did I say "fresh reboot"? Nowhere!
N8ter said:
Gonma take our two vibrants to tmo and use my camcorder to rexord us using different phones after fresh reboots soon to shut up idiots like u.
The lag issue is far from overblown.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am interested in seeing said video.
Here is a video I took a while back. I'd be interested in seeing the lag. I know someone with a DROID X, behavior is exactly the same when opening apps. It was the same when I installed the lag fix.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl1Q2qlRNwE
I'm on stock JI6, non-rooted.
I think what I'm experiencing is considered lag.
It doesn't happen all the time but it is annoying when it does.
Sometimes it'll take 10 seconds for an app to launch.
It's especially bad if I have more than a couple of apps going at the same time.
Some of this can be worked around, keeping as few apps going as possible. I don't use a task killer, I just back out of apps instead of switching home and keeping the app in memory.
There are certain apps where it seems to be worse in.
The Facebook app is horrible to the point where I don't use it but I'm not sure if that's the app or the phone. I can't scroll a page without the phone locking up for 3-4 seconds. Clicking on anything takes about 3-5 seconds for it to register.
I'm pretty disappointed in Samsung in general with their software. The hardware is great, the software just sucks.
One of these days I'll get around to installing another ROM.
knurdle said:
I'm on stock JI6, non-rooted.
I think what I'm experiencing is considered lag.
It doesn't happen all the time but it is annoying when it does.
Sometimes it'll take 10 seconds for an app to launch.
It's especially bad if I have more than a couple of apps going at the same time.
Some of this can be worked around, keeping as few apps going as possible. I don't use a task killer, I just back out of apps instead of switching home and keeping the app in memory.
There are certain apps where it seems to be worse in.
The Facebook app is horrible to the point where I don't use it but I'm not sure if that's the app or the phone. I can't scroll a page without the phone locking up for 3-4 seconds. Clicking on anything takes about 3-5 seconds for it to register.
I'm pretty disappointed in Samsung in general with their software. The hardware is great, the software just sucks.
One of these days I'll get around to installing another ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You obviously have something else going on here.. Facebook runs with no problems on my phone. If you flash another rom everything will be wiped, just the same as what I said above. The FB app taking 10 seconds to load and locking up the phone is NOT normal behavior.
heygrl said:
You obviously have something else going on here.. Facebook runs with no problems on my phone. If you flash another rom everything will be wiped, just the same as what I said above. The FB app taking 10 seconds to load and locking up the phone is NOT normal behavior.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're right. It doesn't make sense that facebook would be so bad.
Everything else is pretty much okay.
I think I'm going to try one of the other ROMs. Just need to find some time.
Also, I'm dreading having to go through the whole process of reinstalling and reconfiguring everything. I might have to try titanium backup so that I don't have to do that.

Archos 101 and 2.2 starting to dislike even more

The more I use this.. the More i realize that Archos needs some majoy fixes coming soon.. The performance on Android 2.2 is actually pretty bad. I think 2.1 ran better.. I can't do more than 2 tabs at a time in the browser. if I do 3 I get mad lag and freezing and often leads to complete freeze if one has flash on it.. Last night it rebooted twice on me after freezing on simple flash sites like Engadget.. My G1 ran better to be honest. Yea it didn't have flash. but my G1 ran better.
At first I was liking 2.2 and it seemed pretty good. but constantly killing tasks trying to keep performance good is getting old. yea yea 256mb ram. People keep saying this, but the Original Droid runs great compared to this. They have pretty similar hardware.. I sure hope root, and a custom rom comes out soon, that or Archos updates 2.2 and actually ENABLES the JIT Compiler and other things this time. cuz performance is slower on 2.2 than on 2.1
I wanna keep this, but I don't at the same time. lol
From what some people with insider information are saying, there will be an update soon. I think they released froyo because they said they would and not because they thought it was perfect. Still have hope something good is coming. Actually I find that the device runs quite ok even though I have to use the task killer very often.
Sent from my A70S using Tapatalk
LauncherPro completely eliminated the response lag for me, and I haven't needed to run a kill since I installed it.
There are only two important settings to optimize performance in the Menu->Preferences. In the General Setting, check "Keep in memory". In the Advanced Settings->Memory Usage Settings, set the 'Memory usage preset' to 'High'.
The device is now faster than it was in 2.1. Archos should be shipping this launcher instead of the default (or properly tune the default launcher).
macemoneta said:
LauncherPro completely eliminated the response lag for me, and I haven't needed to run a kill since I installed it.
There are only two important settings to optimize performance in the Menu->Preferences. In the General Setting, check "Keep in memory". In the Advanced Settings->Memory Usage Settings, set the 'Memory usage preset' to 'High'.
The device is now faster than it was in 2.1. Archos should be shipping this launcher instead of the default (or properly tune the default launcher).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed I am using ADW Launcher and it is now buttery smooth. - Edit: It completed froze up on me several times since then and I have since removed ADW, it was great for responsiveness and scrolling but it was eating memory like crazy.
Nutsonfire said:
From what some people with insider information are saying, there will be an update soon. I think they released froyo because they said they would and not because they thought it was perfect. Still have hope something good is coming. Actually I find that the device runs quite ok even though I have to use the task killer very often.
i noticed major issues with my archos 28 and 43.the problem was because i installed the Google market from archos fans.its cool and all but i erased it and restored them.they ran near perfect.with market installed i had battery issues and touchscreen issues.if you have market installed and your device is acting up,get rid of market and maybe try again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What market installer you use?
Zeam Launcher and Performance so far
micmcguire said:
Agreed I am using ADW Launcher and it is now buttery smooth. - Edit: It completed froze up on me several times since then and I have since removed ADW, it was great for responsiveness and scrolling but it was eating memory like crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have since swiched to Zeam Launcher and I love the drawer, and have not had to kill any processes yet. I may have found a winner!
Try doing a full wipe and reinstall. I was having charging issues and did the full wipe and it not only fixed my charging issue, but it sped the whole thing up (even w/out z4root) ad its been far more stable too.
It does that for me too. Much faster and smoother after a full wipe. Runs perfect now with very rare issues of freezing... I was having much more issues beforehand, even z4root not rooting (Which might have been because of app2sd).
All my apps are on the tiny 300MB space now...
Yup me too. Ut is really snappy without even being rooted.
Did a quadrant without root - got 860.
Rooted - 1019.
No lag and no issues on my 70.
micmcguire said:
Agreed I am using ADW Launcher and it is now buttery smooth. - Edit: It completed froze up on me several times since then and I have since removed ADW, it was great for responsiveness and scrolling but it was eating memory like crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
micmcguire said:
I have since swiched to Zeam Launcher and I love the drawer, and have not had to kill any processes yet. I may have found a winner!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two days in and still really happy with Zeam. I even removed z4 and set CPU completely from my 101.
timjjcarter said:
Yup me too. Ut is really snappy without even being rooted.
Did a quadrant without root - got 860.
Rooted - 1019.
No lag and no issues on my 70.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with the new beta firmware the quadrant result is up for 25 %
Ive got the 101 with 2.2 but Im getting ready to sell it off. Im just not happy with it and even IF custom ROMs and perm rooting happens, the limitation of the app storage and 256 RAM is a killer for me. I thought it would perform ok and for some I guess it does but it isnt living up to me standards.
Maybe the G-Tab or Adam will be better
Yea im not sure what i think anymore. I was loving it for a day or 2.
Ive been running LP n it made scrolling better, but thats all. I feel like overall stock is better.
ive been having even more major problems after writing that post. Now archos tv out, music, and video widgets all crash on startup and FC if i try to open them. It has froze completely 4 times tonight. Restarted 3 on its own. Browser cant handle more than 2 tabs.. i just wiped my device back to stock once again. For now things seem pretty good. Ill give it a few days stock n see. But been smooth the last hour or so
Im seriously considering selling it and getting a like new Galaxy Tab. The G was decent, and the N Ink is unproven n not even shown its hardware in a while.. but i have high hopes. Well see. I do agree froyo was not ready n needs some serious work. Archos needs a update asap
cajl said:
with the new beta firmware the quadrant result is up for 25 %
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beta Firmware?
Yes, there are a few people that do beta testing.
And i can confirm that without root and setcpu we are now arount 1400-1500.
fzelle said:
Yes, there are a few people that do beta testing.
And i can confirm that without root and setcpu we are now arount 1400-1500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great news! Hopefully it is working at least as good as the 1.0.84 (no SMB and WPA2 wifi issues)
Issues keeping me from loving it (I think these are all pretty common):
No access to the files on my WHS except via UPnP (SMB Folder Empty issue)
Graphical lock no longer shows green lines (it does unlock though)
WIFI occasionally quits until I stop/restart it
Flash is slower than dirt and causes Dolphin HD to FC a lot (I ended up uninstalling flash)
General lagginess unless I constantly kill tasks
WHS seems to have an authorisation problem, as with every linux box smb seems to work flawlessly ( as with my buffalo Mini ).
As there is no official Flash you can only have one that was designed for another device, so that explains a little.
I personaly have only seen the remark from archos that they have a hw accelerated version in a certification process by adobe.
And the rest might be already fixed, if i would know anything or could talk about it.
fzelle said:
WHS seems to have an authorisation problem, as with every linux box smb seems to work flawlessly ( as with my buffalo Mini ).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the issue is that Archos doesn't give you a way to specify the username/password combination to use to connect to the SMB server. I bet if I turned on guest access to my WHS it would work, but I'd prefer not to do that...

Slow Gallery in DK28?

I did some searches and didn't really come up with an answer on this one so forgive me if it has been asked and answered already.
After jumping to DK28 my gallery app loads extremely slowly. It literally drops 1 picture at a time in the folders on the screen. This combined with the very slow screen response is driving me nuts. Is there anything to fix this or should I just go back to DI18?
thanks for the help.
Yes it does. Froyo DK28 has been such a disappointment.
To add to this so do the:
App list
Web browsers
song list (which is ridiculous since I only reloaded three songs back to the card)
And i'm getting like 2 hours on the battery when all i'm doing is reading a kindle book
Stock DI18 to Stock DK28
I have not had this issue with DK28. The gallery loads up as fast as DI18.
I definately agree. The gallery app is hella slow with Dk28
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
shellee said:
Yes it does. Froyo DK28 has been such a disappointment.
To add to this so do the:
App list
Web browsers
song list (which is ridiculous since I only reloaded three songs back to the card)
And i'm getting like 2 hours on the battery when all i'm doing is reading a kindle book
Stock DI18 to Stock DK28
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree on the gallery, it is really slow. However, I am not seeing issues with any of the other things you listed.
same here. ver slow loading...
Glad to see I'm not the only one. I tried an app suggested on this forum called "Large Image Viewer". Its a decent app but you can't delete from it or move files or anything like that as in the Gallery. But it is fast and it does a decent job for viewing.
I am still thinking about going back to DI18.
How many pictures do you all have in your gallery, because the gallery is fast for me. I have about 300 total in a few different folders, with one folder having 207, and the rest spread out in 3 or 4 other folders.
Agreed...that's why i wish some devs would stick with 2.1 roms...2.2 only adds flash....but is slow as molasses.
I thought DK28 felt really slow too. The notification bar was noticeably slower, but so were SMS threads, app drawer, and gallery.
I ended up flashing back to DI18 stock for the GPS.... Mine was toast in DK28 and I really didn't feel like screwing around getting it to work. I'd rather sit it out and get the official Froyo update when it rolls
Everything was slower in DK28. The gallery was especially bad. I am back to DI18 as well.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
2.2 adds much more than just flash.
suzook said:
Agreed...that's why i wish some devs would stick with 2.1 roms...2.2 only adds flash....but is slow as molasses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I hope you folks realize that the DK28 was a leak and as such is not a finished 2.2 version. So you can't compare an unfinished 2.2 to a stock 2.1. For what the DK28 leak brought even in its unfinished state, i like it a lot, especially if you're running any of the customized DK28 (like Nebula ROM !!).
So if you don't like the performance of the leaked DK28, find a custom ROM and see the difference.
LordLugard said:
I hope you folks realize that the DK28 was a leak and as such is not a finished 2.2 version. So you can't compare an unfinished 2.2 to a stock 2.1. For what the DK28 leak brought even in its unfinished state, i like it a lot, especially if you're running any of the customized DK28 (like Nebula ROM !!).
So if you don't like the performance of the leaked DK28, find a custom ROM and see the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am fairly certain we all understand that. Or at least I hope so. I was using Nebula ROM 1.0.5 and it was very good for being DK28, but I still had horrible gallery lag, lousy multi-tasking, and other minor issues (none of which I attributed to Nebula). Yeah, for a leaked version it isn't bad...there have been much worse. But for me the performance hits were more than enough to justify going back to DI18 and waiting for something better. I look at it as though I would rather my car have an old engine that does everything quite well rather than a new engine that does more, but doesn't do it as well.
I agree it is super slow, my co-workers were ragging on me about the speed and how slow it was.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I went back to DI18 as well. DK28 didn't show any of the expected speed increase for 2.2. Keyboard response felt a bit better long as there wasn't a lot of programs in the background. Wifi kept flaking out with dropped connections and giving me errors when I tried to turn it on through the notification bar.
I hope they optimize it soon and release cause I miss the youtube application. That thing was sweet.
LordLugard said:
I hope you folks realize that the DK28 was a leak and as such is not a finished 2.2 version. So you can't compare an unfinished 2.2 to a stock 2.1. For what the DK28 leak brought even in its unfinished state, i like it a lot, especially if you're running any of the customized DK28 (like Nebula ROM !!).
So if you don't like the performance of the leaked DK28, find a custom ROM and see the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. The gallery is slow. It seems there are those that do not take into consideration that this is a leak. Issues will come about when you deal with something that isnt intended as a RC.
That said, I originally went back to 2.1 after some of the issues with 2.2 that I was experiencing were getting to me. However, I tried 2.2 again the other day, and after letting my phone "adjust" for a few days the gallery seems improved slightly. Not as great as 2.1, but better, for me at least.
chino0131 said:
I tried 2.2 again the other day, and after letting my phone "adjust" for a few days the gallery seems improved slightly. Not as great as 2.1, but better, for me at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do agree with this.
I am trying a 2.2 rom with ext4 and my gallery is still very slow too. However it is worse than it seems. Quite often I would try to watch a standard defenition tv show, which should be no problem, and the phone chokes on it and cant do it. I downloaded an app called watchdog and everytime it happened it said the gallery was using significant processor in the background, even though i never even opened the gallery. I could confirm this by force closing the gallery and videos would play again. I have never heard anybody here say anything like this happens to them but it has happened to me for every custom 2.2 rom I have tried. It happens for video of all types and every video player. I can only hope that if an official 2.2 rom ever comes out I will be able to watch video on it.
Also while I was trying to monitor this to figure out what was happening I downloaded system panel and it show my cpu activity as always having something they refer to as Nice, (in addition to System and User activity) and when they videos won't play that Nice activity is always going high keeping the total cpu usage maxed out so that it sits at around 1000 MHz.
tl;dr My gallery is very slow as well and if you watch a lot of video on a froyo rom and it gives you no trouble please help me.

Categories

Resources