Database Users

Problem with Android Installation on HD2 see only the battery level

Hey Guys
My problem is
i want to install android on my hd2 but when linux is booting there comes only the battery level an then if the battery level shows 6% the battery is to low and the hd2 turns off
could someone help me
e.d:
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=78
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 78%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV,
-[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV, -
....
....
....
ps: im from germany ^^ sry for my bad english
Lilolong

can you help me pleaaaaaaas

you need to update your radio and install custom rom. to fin out step by step instruction go here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=732380

Du musst schon ein bisschen warten!? der erste start dauert echt lange
das ist eine Routine die den Batterieystatus abfragt.
das ist noch normal!?

Firstly, the SD card will unmount when the battery is below 6%, so that would possibly explain why you cant boot when the battery is that low.
Secondly, you should ask this question under the thread of the ROM you are using!

I had the same problem. But solved with HSPL 3. Just download it, hack your device. No Rom or Radio upgrades needed. Now Froyo installed. I tell u, HD2 flies with this OS. Live WP and games are incredible.

My Battery was at 100% i wate 10 hours from 20 o´**** to 6 o´clock in the morning xD i thing the first boot cant need so lonmg time ^^
i test it wis HSPL_3 now i hop that it works ^^
thx

ok in the booting text stand :
the superblock could not be read or does not describe a corrext ext2
filesystem. if the device is valid and it really contains a n ext2
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else) the the superblock
is corrupt and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock
mount: mounting /dev/block/loop0 on /data failed: invalid ar failed
failed to mount /data/bin/sh: cant access tty: jpb controll turned off
and then comes again :
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=78
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 78%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV,
-[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV, -
....
....
....
now i wate for 1/2 houre and there is only the batterl level text
:
ok in the booting text stand :
the superblock could not be read or does not describe a corrext ext2
filesystem. if the device is valid and it really contains a n ext2
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else) the the superblock
is corrupt and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock
mount: mounting /dev/block/loop0 on /data failed: invalid ar failed
failed to mount /data/bin/sh: cant access tty: jpb controll turned off
and then comes again :
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=80
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 80%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=79
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 79%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=78
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 78%, 3965 mV, -
[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV,
-[14130.142817] ACR=3741 FL_1256 RAAC=77
[14130.942791] htcleo-battery 0-0026 : batt: 77%, 3965 mV, -
....
....
....
please help me

Hye I made a Video lock at this :
piiiiiiep i cant post links ;D
ok go on youtube and search the user Lilolong theres a video fromm booting android the name is: Android Problem HD2

Its not a problem, If you read the stickies and follow whats been laid out for you already.
This thread is a question, not a development thread. Please dont post in this section as its a user error.
Start with a sdcard format if you have already installed a custom winmo ROM.

[Q] Camera broken

Hi all,
the camera on my Glacier appears to be broken. Any "camera related" app I try to launch force closes after a few seconds. This is true for the built-in camera app, for a barcode scanner app and even for a torch app that would use the flash and not really the camera.
I have already cleared the cache and Davlik and have fixed the permissions to no avail. I ran a logcat from launching the camera app until after I clicked the "force close" button:
Code:
I/ActivityManager( 1351): Starting: Intent { act=android.intent.action.MAIN cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.android.camera/.Camera bnds=[96,721][192,800] } from pid 1702
I/ActivityManager( 1351): Start proc com.android.camera for activity com.android.camera/.Camera: pid=3292 uid=10048 gids={1006, 1015}
I/WindowManager( 1351): Setting rotation to 1, animFlags=1
V/CameraHolder( 3292): open camera 0
W/WindowManager( 1351): App freeze timeout expired.
W/WindowManager( 1351): Force clearing freeze: AppWindowToken{40a23298 token=HistoryRecord{40a230d8 com.android.camera/.Camera}}
I/InputDispatcher( 1351): Application is not responding: AppWindowToken{40a23298 token=HistoryRecord{40a230d8 com.android.camera/.Camera}}. 9279.3ms since event, 5004.2ms since wait started
I/WindowManager( 1351): Input event dispatching timed out sending to application AppWindowToken{40a23298 token=HistoryRecord{40a230d8 com.android.camera/.Camera}}
I/Process ( 1351): Sending signal. PID: 3292 SIG: 3
I/dalvikvm( 3292): threadid=4: reacting to signal 3
I/dalvikvm( 3292): Wrote stack traces to '/data/anr/traces.txt'
I/Process ( 1351): Sending signal. PID: 1351 SIG: 3
I/dalvikvm( 1351): threadid=4: reacting to signal 3
I/dalvikvm( 1351): Wrote stack traces to '/data/anr/traces.txt'
I/Process ( 1351): Sending signal. PID: 1617 SIG: 3
I/dalvikvm( 1617): threadid=4: reacting to signal 3
I/dalvikvm( 1617): Wrote stack traces to '/data/anr/traces.txt'
W/ActivityManager( 1351): Activity idle timeout for HistoryRecord{40a230d8 com.android.camera/.Camera}
I/Process ( 1351): Sending signal. PID: 1572 SIG: 3
D/dalvikvm( 1351): GC_EXPLICIT freed 732K, 38% free 6779K/10823K, external 1561K/2073K, paused 88ms
E/ActivityManager( 1351): ANR in com.android.camera (com.android.camera/.Camera)
E/ActivityManager( 1351): Reason: keyDispatchingTimedOut
E/ActivityManager( 1351): Load: 3.4 / 3.17 / 2.89
E/ActivityManager( 1351): CPU usage from 5627ms to 1ms ago:
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 4.2% 1351/system_server: 3.1% user + 1% kernel / faults: 796 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 3.5% 3050/adbd: 0.1% user + 3.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 2.3% 1245/mediaserver: 0% user + 2.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 2.1% 1572/com.android.systemui: 1.2% user + 0.8% kernel / faults: 1 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.7% 1268/logcat2: 0.1% user + 1.5% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.4% 3071/com.google.android.apps.maps: 1% user + 0.3% kernel / faults: 292 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.4% 3290/logcat: 0.3% user + 1% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0.8% 1249/akmd: 0.3% user + 0.5% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0.7% 1252/htc_ebdlogd: 0% user + 0.7% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0.3% 6/events/0: 0% user + 0.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0.3% 921/emmc-qd: 0% user + 0.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0% 1184/jbd2/mmcblk0p28: 0% user + 0% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0% 1658/wpa_supplicant: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 11 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0% 2310/twc.provider: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 43 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 0.1% 3292/com.android.camera: 0.1% user + 0% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 14% TOTAL: 6.9% user + 7.8% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): CPU usage from 297ms to 819ms later:
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 7.4% 1351/system_server: 0% user + 7.4% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 5.5% 1528/InputDispatcher: 0% user + 5.5% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 3% 3050/adbd: 1.5% user + 1.5% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 3% 3050/adbd: 0% user + 3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.5% 3055/adbd: 1.5% user + 0% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 1245/mediaserver: 0% user + 1.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 2450/Binder Thread #: 0% user + 1.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 1252/htc_ebdlogd: 0% user + 1.3% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 1268/logcat2: 0% user + 1.3% kernel / faults: 2 minor
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 1572/com.android.systemui: 1.3% user + 0% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 1.3% 1572/ndroid.systemui: 1.3% user + 0% kernel
E/ActivityManager( 1351): 11% TOTAL: 5.7% user + 5.7% kernel
I/InputDispatcher( 1351): Dropping event because the pointer is not down.
I/InputDispatcher( 1351): Dropping event because the pointer is not down.
W/ActivityManager( 1351): Force finishing activity com.android.camera/.Camera
I/Process ( 1351): Sending signal. PID: 3292 SIG: 9
I/ActivityManager( 1351): Killing com.android.camera (pid=3292): user's request
I/ActivityManager( 1351): Process com.android.camera (pid 3292) has died.
W/InputManagerService( 1351): Window already focused, ignoring focus gain of: [email protected]
My next step now would be a factory reset, but before I do that I'd like to see whether anybody's got a better idea. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
---------- Post added at 12:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 PM ----------
I just did another reboot and launched the camera app, again. On the first attempt the behavior was the same as before: the app force closed after a while. On any subsequent attempts to launch the camera app I now get the error message "Camera Error / Cannot connect to camera".

We need more info. Are you rooted? What rom? What kernel? Any mods, themes? Things like this can break stuff.
If youre rooted and running a custom rom, just reflash the rom from a full wipe.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium

I would try full wipe and flash the ROM again.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

the device is rooted; I am running CM 7.0.3 with kernel 2.6.35.14 demonspeed v9. It's probably the kernel that causing these problems. After re-flashing CM 7.0.3 (thus going back to the kernel that comes with the ROM), the camera started working again ...

[18 Apr 2014] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark results

Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / Apolo / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels
As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.
Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk/Hangout on – wifi and Skype running if specified.
For all custom kernels, I was running on the stock ROM specified in brackets.
For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)
Last added: Apolo v4.14 (Regular) on XWMS3 NeatROM v5.8 (battery tests and benchmark results)
Here are my current results:
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.14 regular: 0,94
Apolo v4.13 regular: 1,01
Apolo v4.10 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.12 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.11 regular: 1,12
NeatROM XWLSZ: 1,13
Dorimanx v8.35: 1,14
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.10.0: 1,24
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWMS1: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,35
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
NeatROM XWMS2: 1,49
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29
[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.14 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,94% per hour, Wifi: 9,7%, Awake: 10,6%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 0,85%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,91%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,2%, Awake: 10,3%, Screen: 9,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,1%, Awake: 10,2%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,0%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,00%
Apolo v4.11 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 1,12% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,01%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 1,12% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,01%
NeatROM XWLSZ: Battery loss of 1,13% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,02%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,14% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,03%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWMS1: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,35% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 8,7%, Awake: 9,7%, Screen: 8,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,26%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
NeatROM XWMS2: Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 9,8%, Awake: 10,7%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
Code:
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
Apolo v4.14 regular: 0,17
Apolo v4.13 regular: 0,18
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): 0,24
Apolo v4.11 regular: 0,36
NeatROM XWMS2: 0,37
Apolo v4.12 regular: 0,40
PhilZ v5.10.0: 0,40
NeatROM XWMS1: 0,41
Apolo v4.10 regular: 0,43
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
Dorimanx v8.35: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
NeatROM XWLSZ: 0,47
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63
[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.14 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,17% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,18% per hour, Awake: 0,9%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,24% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): Battery loss of 0,35% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,35% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Apolo v4.11 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 0,36% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWMS2: Battery loss of 0,37% per hour, Awake: 0,8%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWMS1: Battery loss of 0,41% per hour, Awake: 0,9%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,41% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,43% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
NeatROM XWLSZ: Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]AnTuTu[/B]
Apolo v4.14 (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): 11159
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): 11117
Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10990
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10983
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): 10933
Apolo v4.11 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): 10848
Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): 10824
NeatROM XWMS2: 10564
NeatROM XWMS1: 10527
NeatROM XWLSZ: 10212
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10064
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9929
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9887
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799
My credits go to:
Intratech for his excellent Official Firmware thread and his support
Faryaab for his Stock Official Firmwares thread for recent ICS and JB ROM versions (kind of cooperation with SamMobile)
hardcore for his great SpeedMod kernel
fenomeno83 for his superb idea to undervolt SpeedMod and create Phenomenal kernel, and to geroxx for his hiroX kernel.
gokhanmoral for his "father" SiyahKernel and his technical descriptions
simone201 for his "new spirit" N.E.A.K. and his collaboration
pedestre for his fantastic Apolo kernel
droidphile for his very helpful and understandable descriptions and clues
Entropy512 for his detailed and technical way of pointing into the right direction
geko95gek for his British humor and support
Chainfire for his CF-Root kernel, Mobile Odin, TriangleAway, CF-Bench, etc, etc., etc.
AndroidGX for his nice battery saving tips
AMDPOWERFIST for his inspiration, tips and trick for maximum battery life
chamonix for his very useful BetterBatteryStats (BBS) app
ram3n for his easy and simple but working method for battery calibration
dorimanx for his support, team working and super-highly configurable DorimanX kernel
_Sale_ for his excellent NeatROM, never-ending support and outstanding friendliness
ApriliaM3 for his dev-host collection of various needful files, his helping way ... all over xda
THE RED BLUR for his cave with useful information and instructions for clean flashing ROMs/kernels and his motivated contributions in various threads
Many40 for his awesome guide for best battery life on NeatROM with SiyahKernel (check out the whole thread for all of his shared configs and support) and his polite way to help where possible
hawkerpaul for his handy scripts, besides this he made some really nice mods for NeatROM (just check ApriliaM3's dev-host files)
All kernel developers for their work, support and providing their kernels for free
XDA for this wonderful platform to share knowledge and information about development, smartphones, battery stuff, settings, apps, etc.
Thread rule(s):
1. General xda rules.
2. Please no "My is the best ROM/kernel" statements.
You are all welcome to share your experiences and test results.
And I accept if you feel that this or that kernel/ROM perfectly fits your individual needs.
But I don't want that my thread becomes a platform for "my ... is better than yours" discussions.
3. For optimizing your battery life, please use BetterBatteryStats (BBS) app and post an idle dump of about 4 hours in BBS thread.
Don't mess this thread with such specific posts containing dump files, screenshots of your battery stats, etc. just for asking what drains your battery and how to optimize it.
Thanks for your understanding !

My last Jelly Bean (JB) kernel test results => last JB kernel test results
My last Ice Cream Sandwich (ICE) kernel test results => last ICS kernel test results
My last GingerBread (GB) kernel test results => last GB kernel test results
Current activity: Testing Apolo v4.14 on XWMS3 NeatROM v6.3 Aroma.
My "kernels-to-test" list:
Latest stock / PhilZ-touch kernel
Latest SpeedMod kernel
Latest SiyahKernel
Latest Jeboo kernel
Latest Dorimanx kernel
Latest Apolo kernel
Latest Phenomenal / HiroX kernel (no new version for Phenomenal and HiroX does not run stable on my phone)
Latest Shun Andromeda kernel (no stock JB support ATM)
Latest CF-Root kernel (no new version available)
Latest DreamKernel (no new version available)
Latest N.E.A.K. (no new version available)
Latest Galaxian Kernel (no new version available)
DM kernel (thread closed ATM)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some FAQs:
Question: Why has one kernel such good battery test results and the other is worse?
Answer:
My "normal" usage is kind of light.
No gaming, no extensive internet browsing/chatting, nearly no phone calls, no fm radio, no streaming, etc.
That's why the difference between the kernels are not that big.
I don't have an explicit reason why the one kernel has such good battery life on my phone and the other has worse results.
In suspicious cases, I already have re-done the test, and in the second battery cycle, the same kernel can have a little bit different battery life - but in most cases, the results were nearly the same.
As there are so many influences, even I try to keep all things unchanged, there are some I can not control directly.
So, the thing is that you flash the kernel on your phone and check it under "your" conditions.
Question: Why does it take so much time to post new test results?
Answer:
As I prefer doing a kind of "real-life" tests, these battery tests take some time to be finished.
Benchmarks are quickly done.
Battery stress tests - running heavy operations for a special time and checking the battery consumption - can also be quick.
But using the phone in a "normal" like every-day way, well ... to get reliable results, this tests have to take more time IMO.
And I try to use nearly the same period of time for all my mixed usage batters tests, which is about 20 hours.
Question: What do the different numbers mean?
Answer:
Benchmark test numbers = scores / results of the corresponding benchmark app.
Battery loss of x% per hour:
Battery power was a% at the beginning of the test and b% at the end, so the battery loss was a-b% during the test. This number would be only "comparable", if all the test are taking exactly the same time. As sometimes the battery test is slightly shorter and sometimes a little bit longer, I "normalize" this battery loss by dividing by the testing time t (in hours).
So I receive a battery loss x = (a-b) / t in %/hour, which is better comparable for all tests.
The other numbers are ratios in % for the different phone states/times during the test (Awake time, Screen on time, Deep sleep time, etc. divided by the testing time) - I get these ratios/values from BetterBatteryStats (BBS) app.
And in mixed usage battery test, I saw a direct relation between screen on time and the battery loss per hour, and as I do not have exactly the same screen on time in all tests, I tried to "normalize" this battery loss per hour by the mentioned formula:
loss*(1-screen) = battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
Question: What is most important for you/me to "judge" a kernel/ROM?
Answer:
1. Real-life experience for stability => does the system work without any issues.
2. Real-life experience for smoothness => does the system feel smooth and responsive.
3. Real-life experience for battery life => has the system a good battery life with low battery consumption.
...
4. Customizable => is the system highly customizable for tweaking/change settings/load profiles/etc.
5. Compatibility => is the system compatible with many popular tools/apps for tweaking/changing settings/applying profiles.
...
6. Benchmarks => has the system good benchmark results with high scores.
...
Maybe I forgot some aspects and every user has a different priority.
Question: Why is your/my mixed usage such "light"?
Answer:
Because this is my "normal" / everyday / real-life usage.
Sorry about that.
And for me, it is most important to test my system in real-life usage.
To be precise: I my real-life usage.
...
If you want some test results for another usage ... maybe your normal usage which seems to be "heavier", then be inspired to start testing different kernels on your phone.
You are welcome to share your results and experiences.
Question: What are your settings for better battery life?
Answer:
Have a look at this tips collection => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16973603
Nothing more to add.
I disabled all location services, auto-sync, bluetooth, set to lowest brightness, use a black background, disabled some system apps (such as Social Hub, Games Hub, Music Hub, Samsung Hub, Google+, BBC, Zinio, etc.).
On GB and ICS, I enabled wifi all the time as I am in a strong wifi area. Since JB, I am using Better Wifi On/Off app to turn wifi off when phone is unplugged and screen off.
On GB and ICS, I had enabled fast dormancy, as my mobile provider supports it. But since JB I have disabled fast dormancy, as it has worse battery life with a massive fd wakelock.
Question: What is your xda username and what does it stand for?
Answer:
My xda username is "It_ler" = IT (information technology) + underscore + LER (German postfix for personalizing things).
Get a definition of the meaning of "IT'ler" in German => http://translate.google.de/translat...zenesprachenwiki.de/definition/itler/&act=url
Question: What apps have you disabled? What are your manual tweaks for better battery life?
Answer:
Here I posted a short summary of what I have done manually to get better battery life and a link to my disabled apps (specific for XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0) => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36229516&postcount=1359, and for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=37210595&postcount=1705. For stock XWLSD => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=37783486&postcount=1868.
Question: What autostarts have you disabled?
Answer:
I read a lot in the BBS app thread and found two very good advices how to reduce the number of alarms for Maps, GSF and Google Play Sevices. Here I linked to the instruction posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usual procedure for testing:
First, I am searching for a stable, smooth and battery friendly stock ROM.
Then I try to keep as much unchanged as possible (same apps, settings, connections, Modem/Phone/Baseband, CSC, region, time for nightly use, time for mixed usage, screen on time, etc.) in order to get reliable results which can be reproduced.
After flashing a new kernel, I do a normal reboot and if I recognize any issue, I wipe cache partition and Dalvik cache in CWM recovery.
Normally I do not wipe/clear anything for switching kernels, as I do not use any kind of scripts, tweaks, manual UV/UC, etc..
I test all kernel on its completely default settings => kind of "Out-of-the-box".
After booting the kernel and having tested all important functions (internet, wifi, synching accounts, root and busybox (BB) check, scrolling, swiping, browsing, etc.), I reboot the phone again and start the benchmark tests.
Then I shut down the phone and fully charge it to 100%.
Then I unplug the phone, pull out the battery for some minutes, put it back again and turn on the phone.
Usually I wait so a while and start the battery test somewhere in the 95-99% ... as I am flashing in the evening, I start directly with the night usage battery test.
I am using chamonix's BetterBattery Stats (BBS) app to set a custom reference and log all battery stats/wakelocks/alarms/times/etc.
This will take about 8-10 hours, depending on the start and end time
This nightly usage is part of the mixed usage battery test too.
Additionally in the day usage, I try to reproduce the same usage at the same places with nearly the same screen on time of about 2 hours in a time period of about 20 hours.
Sometimes I have to finish the test some minutes earlier or later, sometimes I have a little bit more or less screen on time, but I really try to keep everything which I can influence directly the same.
If I recognize some unusual wakelocks or significant differences from previous kernel versions, I do a second battery test in a second battery cycle.
And once I had to restore the nandroid backup of an older system to come back to my "usual" battery life/consumption and repeat the kernel tests.
But this is the absolute exception.
Normally, I do not have any issues switching ROMs and kernels.

Jelly Bean
Test results from 03.10.2013: Base ROM was XWLSW (JB)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.9 regular: 1,07
Apolo v4.10 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.8b light: 1,11
Dorimanx v8.35: 1,14
PhilZ v5.08.5: 1,16
PhilZ v5.07.0: 1,17
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.10.0: 1,24
Apolo v4.7 light: 1,25
PhilZ v5.06.6: 1,26
Dorimanx v8.20: 1,30
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
PhilZ v5.09.2: 1,34
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,35
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
Apolo v4.8 light: 1,40
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29
[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,07% per hour, Wifi: 10,3%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 0,96%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,2%, Awake: 10,3%, Screen: 9,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.8b light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,00%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,14% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,03%
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,16% per hour, Wifi: 9,8%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, cfq/slp): Battery loss of 1,25% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,26% per hour, Wifi: 9,6%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,14%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,28% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,15%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Wifi: 11,5%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,17%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,35% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
Apolo v4.8 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,40% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,26%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
Code:
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
PhilZ v5.07.0: 0,28
Apolo v4.9 regular: 0,33
PhilZ v5.08.5: 0,34
PhilZ v5.10.0: 0,40
Apolo v4.8b light: 0,42
Apolo v4.10 regular: 0,43
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
Dorimanx v8.35: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
PhilZ v5.09.2: 0,46
Apolo v4.7 light: 0,48
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
PhilZ v5.06.6: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Apolo v4.8 light: 0,61
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63
[B]Long[/B]
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,28% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,33% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,34% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Apolo v4.8b light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,42% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,43% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,46% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, cfq/slp): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Apolo v4.8 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
Apolo v4.10 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10751
Apolo v4.11 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10648
Apolo v4.9 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10332
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10064
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9929
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9918
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9887
Apolo v4.8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9837
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9834
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9824
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9615
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799
Test results from 11.06.2013: Base ROM was XWLSS (JB)
Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / Apolo / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.6 light: 1,17
Apolo v4.7 light: 1,18
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.03.0: 1,25
Apolo v4.7 regular : 1,26
Dorimanx v8.20: 1,30
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
Dorimanx v8.16: 1,34
PhilZ v5.06.1: 1,38
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,49
Jeboo v2.1: 1,52
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29
[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Wifi: 10,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,18% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,06%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,11%
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,25% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
Apolo v4.7 regular (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,26% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Wifi: 11,5%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,17%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7, sio/zzmoove): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 10,3%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 23,3%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 32,6%, Awake: 14,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
Code:
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
Apolo v4.7 light: 0,36
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
Apolo v4.7 regular: 0,55
Apolo v4.6 light: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
PhilZ v5.03.0: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Dorimanx v8.20: 0,59
PhilZ v5.06.1: 0,62
Dorimanx v8.16: 0,63
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63
[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,36% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Apolo v4.7 regular (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7, sio/zzmoove): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,62% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 10153
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Apolo v4.6 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 10059
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
Apolo v4.7 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9940
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9857
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9795
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9626
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9254
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799
Test results from 09.05.2013: Base ROM was XWLSN (JB)
Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
PhilZ v4.93.6: 1,20
Dorimanx v8.14: 1,21
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
Dorimanx v8.13: 1,34
SpeedMod K5-7: 1,37
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,49
Jeboo v2.1: 1,52
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29
[B]Long[/B]
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,20% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,08%
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,21% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,09%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,11%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 12,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,37% per hour, Wifi: 13,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 23,3%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 32,6%, Awake: 14,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
Code:
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,46
PhilZ v4.93.6: 0,47
Dorimanx v8.14: 0,51
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,52
Jeboo v2.1: 0,53
XWLSD: 0,53
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-7: 0,57
Dorimanx v8.13: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63
[B]Long[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,46% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 1,4%
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, auto-wifi): Battery loss of 0,51% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,57% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, auto-wifi): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,71% per hour, Awake: 5,0%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 3,5%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 4,7%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 10153
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9969
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9934
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9877
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9821
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9677
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799

Jelly Bean
Test results from 29.03.2013: Base ROM was XWLSD (JB)
Results for Siyah / Jeboo / SpeedMod / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 15,7%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
PhilZ-touch v4.76 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,42% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%
Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 20,4%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 14,3%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,50% per hour, Wifi: 14,1%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,54% per hour, Wifi: 15,8%, Awake: 12,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,56% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.76 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,5%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]AnTuTu v3.x (1st run)[/B]
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): 10095
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799
Test results from 05.02.2013: Base ROM was XWLS8 (JB)
Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels
As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.
Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk on – wifi and Skype running if specified.
For all custom kernels, I was running on the stock ROM specified in brackets.
For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)
Here are my current results:
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 13,6%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,22%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 16,2%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 15,7%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v1.3 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 17,0%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 15,6%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
Jeboo v1.2 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 14,5%, Awake: 12,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
Jeboo v1.2a (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,59% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,43%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 2,4%
Jeboo v1.2 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,57% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.2a (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.3 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]Quadrant Standard (best of 3 runs)[/B]
NeatROM XXLSJ: 4416
Stock XXLSJ: 4337
Stock XWLPD: 4257
Stock XWLPF: 4197
Stock XWLS8: 4175
Stock XWLP3: 4153
Stock XWLP7: 4131
Stock XWLP8: 4110
Stock XWLPG: 4107
Stock XXLPS: 4100
NeatROM XWLS8: 4096
Stock XXLPQ: 4063
Stock XWLPI: 4060
Stock XWLP4: 4046
Stock XWLPU: 3762
Stock XWLPY: 3746
Stock XWLPM: 3619
Stock XWLPX: 3607
Stock XWLPT: 3585
Stock XWLPW: 3515
Stock XWLPO: 3442
[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
Stock XWLPY: 52,3
Stock XWLPW: 52,2
Stock XWLPX: 52,1
Stock XWLPT: 52,1
Stock XWLPO: 52,1
Stock XWLPI: 52,1
Stock XWLPG: 52,1
Stock XWLPD: 52,1
Stock XWLP8: 52,1
Stock XWLP7: 52,0
Stock XWLP3: 51,9
Stock XWLPF: 51,8
Stock XWLPU: 51,6
Stock XWLPM: 51,4
Stock XXLPQ: 51,3
Stock XXLPS: 50,9
Stock XWLP4: 50,8
NeatROM XXLSJ: 49,6
Stock XXLSJ: 49,4
NeatROM XWLS8: 49,2
Stock XWLS8: 48,9
Stock XWKK5: 47,8
Stock XWKK2: 47,6
Stock XWKL1: 38,1
[B]Vellamo1 (best of 2 runs)[/B]
Stock XWLPT: 1484
Stock XWLPU: 1467
Stock XWLPX: 1460
Stock XWLPM: 1451
Stock XWLPO: 1450
Stock XXLPS: 1303
Stock XWLP3: 1285
Stock XWLP8: 1281
Stock XWLPD: 1277
Stock XWLP7: 1270
Stock XXLPQ: 1247
Stock XWLPF: 1226
Stock XILA2: 1225
Stock XWLPI: 1219
Stock XWLA4: 1216
Stock XWKL1: 1173
Stock XWKK5: 1160
Stock XWLP4: 1133
Stock XWLPG: 1127
Stock XWKK2: 1080
[B]Vellamo2 (best of 2 runs): HTML5 / Metal[/B]
Stock XWLS8: 1577 / 413
Stock XXLSJ: 1555 / 415
NeatROM XWLS8: 1523 / 398
NeatROM XXLSJ: 1499 / 410
Stock XWLPW: 1182 / 409
Stock XWLPY: 1163 / 414
[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]
Stock XWLA4: 57.816 / 93.548
Stock XILA2: 57.302 / 91.667
Stock XXLSJ: 48.042 / 81.877
Stock XWLPD: 47.606 / 81.207
Stock XWLPY: 48.263 / 81.090
Stock XWLPX: 48.070 / 81.012
Stock XWLPT: 48.291 / 80.740
Stock XWLPF: 47.960 / 80.740
Stock XXLPS: 47.203 / 80.586
Stock XWLP3: 48.015 / 80.317
NeatROM XXLSJ: 47.525 / 80.279
Stock XWLP8: 48.152 / 80.203
Stock XWLPW: 47.257 / 80.051
Stock XXLPQ: 48.208 / 80.013
NeatROM XWLS8: 47.850 / 79.635
Stock XWLP4: 47.660 / 79.635
Stock XWLPO: 47.987 / 79.522
Stock XWLPI: 47.606 / 79.373
Stock XWLP7: 48.125 / 79.112
Stock XWLPG: 47.960 / 78.779
Stock XWLS8: 47.987 / 78.231
Stock XWLPM: 48.375 / 78.195
Stock XWLPU: 47.987 / 78.086
[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]
Stock XWLA4: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Stock XWLPT: 11216 / 3472 / 6569
Stock XWLP8: 11255 / 3397 / 6540
Stock XWLPD: 11263 / 3372 / 6528
Stock XWLPM: 11231 / 3356 / 6506
Stock XWLPY: 11115 / 3422 / 6499
Stock XWLPX: 11021 / 3370 / 6430
Stock XILA2: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XWLPO: 11050 / 3332 / 6419
Stock XWLPW: 11075 / 3288 / 6402
Stock XWLP4: 10997 / 3338 / 6401
Stock XWLPU: 11018 / 3260 / 6363
Stock XWLPF: 10899 / 3247 / 6307
Stock XWLP3: 10795 / 3212 / 6245
Stock XXLPS: 10791 / 3160 / 6212
Stock XXLPQ: 10862 / 3044 / 6171
Stock XWLPI: 10674 / 3012 / 6076
Stock XXLSJ: 10422 / 3036 / 5990
Stock XWLPG: 10472 / 3002 / 5990
Stock XWLP7: 10354 / 2901 / 5882
NeatROM XXLSJ: 9758 / 3050 / 5733
Stock XWLS8: 9894 / 2834 / 5658
NeatROM XWLS8: 9474 / 2782 / 5458
[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]
Stock XWLPT: 6579
Stock XWLPY: 6570
Stock XWLPU: 6503
Stock XWLPX: 6429
Stock XXLSJ: 6380
Stock XWLPW: 6241
Stock XWLPF: 6237
Stock XWLPD: 6231
Stock XWLP8: 6217
Stock XILA2: 6110
Stock XWLP3: 6109
Stock XXLPQ: 6075
Stock XWLA4: 6009
Stock XWLP4: 5941
Stock XXLPS: 5912
Stock XWLPG: 5892
Stock XWLPM: 5890
NeatROM XXLSJ: 5797
Stock XWLPO: 5541
Stock XWLP7: 5496
Stock XWLPI: 5446
[B]AnTuTu v3.x (1st run)[/B]
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
Test results from 24.01.2013: Base ROM was XXLSJ (JB)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
Dorimanx v7.38 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,27% per hour, Wifi: 11,9%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,14%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 13,6%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
Jeboo v1.1 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,37% per hour, Wifi: 12,8%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
Jeboo v1.1f-rebase (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,1%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
Siyah v6.0b3 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,3%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
Jeboo v1.1b (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Wifi: 14,5%, Awake: 13,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
Dorimanx v7.43 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 15,8%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v1.0e (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,45% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Dorimanx v7.40 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 12,8%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,48% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v1.1a (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,0%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Jeboo v1.1c (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, Skype on): Battery loss of 1,80% per hour, Wifi: 18,7%, Awake: 18,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,62%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
Siyah v6.0b4 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 2,3%
Jeboo v1.1f-rebase (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,51% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
Jeboo v1.1b (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Jeboo v1.1c (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Dorimanx v7.40 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Dorimanx v7.38 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 2,4%
Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Jeboo v1.1 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Jeboo v1.1a (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Dorimanx v7.43 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,62% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Dorimanx v7.41 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD enabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 4,3%
Jeboo v1.0e (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 2,3%
Siyah v6.0b3 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 2,7%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, Skype on): Battery loss of 1,07% per hour, Awake: 9,8%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi on – static IP, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 3,26% per hour, Awake: 44,7%

Ice Cream Sandwich
Test results from 16.11.2012: Base ROM was XWLPY (ICS)
Results for SpeedMod / Phenomenal / Siyah / DreamKernel / Shun Andromeda / Dorimanx / Galaxian/ stock kernels
As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.
Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk and Skype on.
For all custom kernels, I was running on ICS XWLPY (stock) ROM. (Except there is an explicit information with a different base ROM in brackets.)
For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)
Here are my current results:
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
Dorimanx v5.92: Battery loss of 1,60% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,5%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,44%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,67% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,49%
Dorimanx v7.15.1: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,1%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,70% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,53%
XWLPY (CF-Root): Battery loss of 1,70% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,53%
Siyah v5.0rc2: Battery loss of 1,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,54%
Dorimanx v7.13: Battery loss of 1,73% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,3%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,56%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 1,75% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,58%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,77% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,5%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,62%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPD (Google sync): Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
SpeedMod K3-32: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,7%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,85% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 1,89% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,70%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Siyah v5.0rc1: Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
XWLPX (Pre-Rooted): Battery loss of 1,96% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,9%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,75%
Siyah v5.0i: Battery loss of 2,02% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 82%, Deep sleep: 17,6%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,81%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 2,06% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
Dorimanx v7.11: Battery loss of 2,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,2%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 2,14% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,92%
Dorimanx v7.17: Battery loss of 2,18% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,96%
Dorimanx v7.8: Battery loss of 2,18% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,96%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
Siyah v5.0.1: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,08%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,74% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
Dorimanx v7.13: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPY (CF-Root): Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v5.0rc1: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v5.0rc2: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 0,83% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.92: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX (Pre-Rooted): Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.17: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.15.1: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-32: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.11: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
Dorimanx v7.8: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v5.0i: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 0,91% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPT (CF-Root XXLQ5): Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v5.0.1: Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
Siyah v5.0.1 (vpll): Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
Benchmarks
Code:
[B]Quadrant Standard (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Stock XWLPD: 4257
Stock XWLPF: 4197
Stock XWLP3: 4153
Stock XWLP7: 4131
Stock XWLP8: 4110
Stock XWLPG: 4107
Stock XXLPS: 4100
Stock XXLPQ: 4063
Stock XWLPI: 4060
Stock XWLP4: 4046
Stock XWLPU: 3762
Dorimanx v5.92: 3758
Stock XWLPY: 3746
Dorimanx v7.17: 3743
Dorimanx v7.13: 3734
SpeedMod K3-32: 3713
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 3697
Dorimanx v7.16: 3663
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 3635
Stock XWLPM: 3619
Stock XWLPX: 3607
Siyah v5.0.1: 3599
Stock XWLPT: 3585
Dorimanx v7.11: 3581
Galaxian: 3563
Stock XWLPW: 3515
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 3487
Siyah v5.0rc2: 3469
Siyah v5.0i: 3449
Stock XWLPO: 3442
Siyah v5.0rc1: 3433
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 3425
Phenomenal 6.1: 3351
Dorimanx v7.8: 3369
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 3220
[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Siyah v5.0rc2: 55,9
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): 55,3
Siyah v5.0.1 (vpll): 55,1
Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
Stock XWLPY: 52,3
Stock XWLPW: 52,2
Galaxian: 52,1
Stock XWLPX: 52,1
Stock XWLPT: 52,1
Stock XWLPO: 52,1
Stock XWLPI: 52,1
Stock XWLPG: 52,1
Stock XWLPD: 52,1
Stock XWLP8: 52,1
Stock XWLP7: 52,0
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 51,9
Stock XWLP3: 51,9
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 51,8
Stock XWLPF: 51,8
Siyah v5.0rc1: 51,6
Stock XWLPU: 51,6
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 51,5
Stock XWLPM: 51,4
Stock XXLPQ: 51,3
SpeedMod K3-32: 51,2
Siyah v5.0.1: 51,1
Siyah v5.0i: 51,0
Stock XXLPS: 50,9
Dorimanx v5.92: 50,8
Stock XWLP4: 50,8
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 50,5
Stock XWKK5: 47,8
Stock XWKK2: 47,6
Dorimanx v7.13: 47,2
Dorimanx v7.8: 47,2
Dorimanx v7.11: 46,9
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 46,8
Dorimanx v7.16: 46,5
Dorimanx v7.17: 46,2
Stock XWKL1: 38,1
Phenomenal 6.1: 33,9
[B]Vellamo1 (best of 2 runs)[/B]
Stock XWLPT: 1484
Stock XWLPU: 1467
Stock XWLPX: 1460
Stock XWLPM: 1451
Stock XWLPO: 1450
Phenomenal 6.1: 1438
Stock XXLPS: 1303
Stock XWLP3: 1285
Stock XWLP8: 1281
Stock XWLPD: 1277
Stock XWLP7: 1270
Stock XXLPQ: 1247
Stock XWLPF: 1226
Stock XILA2: 1225
Stock XWLPI: 1219
Stock XWLA4: 1216
Stock XWKL1: 1173
Stock XWKK5: 1160
Stock XWLP4: 1133
Stock XWLPG: 1127
Stock XWKK2: 1080
[B]Vellamo2 (best of 2 runs): HTML5 / Metal[/B]
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 1224 / 413
Galaxian: 1214 / 420
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 1208 / 406
SpeedMod K3-32: 1188 / 412
Stock XWLPW: 1182 / 409
Stock XWLPY: 1163 / 414
Dorimanx v7.17: 1163 / 400
Siyah v5.0i: 1161 / 420
Phenomenal 6.1: 1160 / 400
Dorimanx v7.13: 1156 / 403
Dorimanx v7.16: 1156 / 381
Siyah v5.0.1: 1155 / 421
Siyah v5.0rc2: 1136 / 413
Dorimanx v7.11: 1135 / 402
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 1118 / 413
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 1105 / 396
Dorimanx v7.8: 1101 / 380
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 1086 / 401
Siyah v5.0rc1: 1079 / 382
Dorimanx v5.92: 1075 / 380
[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]
Stock XWLA4: 57.816 / 93.548
Stock XILA2: 57.302 / 91.667
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 48.152 / 81.403
Stock XWLPD: 47.606 / 81.207
Stock XWLPY: 48.263 / 81.090
Stock XWLPX: 48.070 / 81.012
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 48.375 / 80.779
Stock XWLPT: 48.291 / 80.740
Stock XWLPF: 47.960 / 80.740
Dorimanx v7.16: 48.152 / 80.702
Stock XXLPS: 47.203 / 80.586
Stock XWLP3: 48.015 / 80.317
SpeedMod K3-32: 48.543 / 80.241
Stock XWLP8: 48.152 / 80.203
Galaxian: 47.987 / 80.165
Dorimanx v7.13: 48.125 / 80.089
Phenomenal 6.1: 48.263 / 80.051
Stock XWLPW: 47.257 / 80.051
Stock XXLPQ: 48.208 / 80.013
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 47.987 / 79.748
Stock XWLP4: 47.660 / 79.635
Stock XWLPO: 47.987 / 79.522
Siyah v5.0i: 47.877 / 79.485
Stock XWLPI: 47.606 / 79.373
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 47.987 / 79.186
Stock XWLP7: 48.125 / 79.112
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 48.263 / 78.964
Stock XWLPG: 47.960 / 78.779
Siyah v5.0rc2: 48.347 / 78.632
Dorimanx v5.92: 48.459 / 78.596
Siyah v5.0rc1: 47.905 / 78.486
Stock XWLPM: 48.375 / 78.195
Stock XWLPU: 47.987 / 78.086
Dorimanx v7.17: 48.097 / 77.619
Dorimanx v7.11: 48.180 / 77.299
Dorimanx v7.8: 48.599 / 76.657
Siyah v5.0.1: 48.180 / 75.601
[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]
Dorimanx v7.16: 11370 / 3583 / 6697
Dorimanx v5.92: 11426 / 3529 / 6687
Stock XWLA4: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Dorimanx v7.17: 11340 / 3540 / 6660
Dorimanx v7.8: 11280 / 3503 / 6613
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 11177 / 3541 / 6595
Dorimanx v7.11: 11332 / 3434 / 6593
Dorimanx v7.13: 11312 / 3411 / 6571
Stock XWLPT: 11216 / 3472 / 6569
Stock XWLP8: 11255 / 3397 / 6540
Phenomenal 6.1: 11234 / 3396 / 6531
Stock XWLPD: 11263 / 3372 / 6528
Stock XWLPM: 11231 / 3356 / 6506
Stock XWLPY: 11115 / 3422 / 6499
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 11124 / 3343 / 6455
Stock XWLPX: 11021 / 3370 / 6430
Galaxian: 11017 / 3371 / 6429
SpeedMod K3-32: 11128 / 3296 / 6428
Stock XILA2: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XWLPO: 11050 / 3332 / 6419
Stock XWLPW: 11075 / 3288 / 6402
Stock XWLP4: 10997 / 3338 / 6401
Siyah v5.0.1: 11049 / 3283 / 6389
Siyah v5.0rc2: 11085 / 3216 / 6363
Stock XWLPU: 11018 / 3260 / 6363
Siyah v5.0i: 10961 / 3258 / 6339
Siyah v5.0rc1: 10821 / 3318 / 6319
Stock XWLPF: 10899 / 3247 / 6307
Stock XWLP3: 10795 / 3212 / 6245
Stock XXLPS: 10791 / 3160 / 6212
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 10851 / 3078 / 6187
Stock XXLPQ: 10862 / 3044 / 6171
Stock XWLPI: 10674 / 3012 / 6076
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 10647 / 2974 / 6043
Stock XWLPG: 10472 / 3002 / 5990
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 10702 / 2787 / 5953
Stock XWLP7: 10354 / 2901 / 5882
[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]
Dorimanx v5.92: 6593
Siyah v5.0rc2: 6583
Stock XWLPT: 6579
Stock XWLPY: 6570
Dorimanx v7.16: 6567
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 6513
Stock XWLPU: 6503
Dorimanx v7.8: 6496
Siyah v5.0.1: 6440
Dorimanx v7.11: 6440
Stock XWLPX: 6429
Dorimanx v7.13: 6419
Dorimanx v7.17: 6418
Siyah v5.0i: 6408
Siyah v5.0rc1: 6379
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 6281
SpeedMod K3-32: 6252
Phenomenal 6.1: 6246
Stock XWLPW: 6241
Stock XWLPF: 6237
Stock XWLPD: 6231
Stock XWLP8: 6217
Galaxian: 6113
Stock XILA2: 6110
Stock XWLP3: 6109
Stock XXLPQ: 6075
Stock XWLA4: 6009
Stock XWLP4: 5941
Stock XXLPS: 5912
Stock XWLPG: 5892
Stock XWLPM: 5890
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 5690
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 5558
Stock XWLPO: 5541
Stock XWLP7: 5496
Stock XWLPI: 5446
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 5287
Test results from 26.10.2012: Base ROM was XWLPX (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 14,7%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,46%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 1,64% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Siyah v4.1.5: Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,58%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 1,78% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%
DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 1,89% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,70%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Dorimanx v5.82: Battery loss of 1,98% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,2%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,78%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.1.5: Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
Dorimanx v5.82: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,2%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%

Ice Cream Sandwich
Test results from 08.09.2012: Base ROM was XWLPT (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 14,5%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPW modem + OXALPS CSC): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 14,7%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
Phenomenal 6.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
DreamKernel v2.7.2: Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,67% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,49%
Siyah v4.1rc1: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
SpeedMod K3-30: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,77% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,5%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,62%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPD (Google sync): Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 1,85% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
Siyah v4.1.1: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
Siyah v4.1.4: Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
Siyah v4.1rc1 (MagicConfig): Battery loss of 1,92% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Siyah v4.0.1: Battery loss of 1,92% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Shun Andromeda 2.0.7e: Battery loss of 1,97% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,6%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,78%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPW modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,98% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,1%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,78%
DM 1.0: Battery loss of 1,99% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,80%
DM 1.1.0: Battery loss of 2,00% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,80%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 2,06% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.6 (XWLPD): Battery loss of 2,11% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,90%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 2,14% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,92%
XWLPD (Auto brightness): Battery loss of 2,15% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,92%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XWLPD (XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 2,35% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,9%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 2,11%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,66% per hour, Awake: 4,3%, Deep sleep: 95%
Siyah v4.1rc1 (MagicConfig): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 4,1%, Deep sleep: 95%
Siyah v4.1.1: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 4,0%, Deep sleep: 96%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
DreamKernel v2.7.2: Battery loss of 0,74% per hour, Awake: 4,3%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,74% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.1rc1: Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 4,4%, Deep sleep: 95%
Shun Andromeda 2.0.7e: Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
Phenomenal 6.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 4,9%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPD (Auto brightness): Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPD (Google sync): Battery loss of 0,76% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.0.1: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-30: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 4,9%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
DM 1.0: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPW modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
DM 1.1.0: Battery loss of 0,88% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPW modem + OXALPS CSC): Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 0,91% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 0,91% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.6 (XWLPD): Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v4.1.4: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,07% per hour, Awake: 8,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWLPD (XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Awake: 9,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
Test results from 26.07.2012: Base ROM was XWLPD (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v3.2.8.2: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-19: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-20: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 7,5%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
Phenomenal 5.4 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v3.2.7.2: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v3.2.4 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 94%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.4 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 92%
Siyah v3.3.1: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
Shun 2.0.2: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.6: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v3.2.8: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
Shun 1.8: Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
Siyah v3.3.2: Battery loss of 1,12% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
Dorimanx 3.6: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx 3.2: Battery loss of 2,09% per hour, Awake: 6,2%, Deep sleep: 93%
Dorimanx 4.2A: Battery loss of 2,27% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 14,7%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
Phenomenal 5.5 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,67% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Phenomenal 5.4 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,66% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 8,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
Siyah v3.2.7.2: Battery loss of 1,74% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,56%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
Siyah v3.3.2: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,0%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,66%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Shun 1.8: Battery loss of 1,92% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,0%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,73%
Siyah v3.2.8.2: Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,6%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
Siyah v3.3.1: Battery loss of 2,01% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 11,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,79%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
Siyah v3.2.8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,89%
Shun Andromeda 2.0.2: Battery loss of 2,11% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,89%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.6: Battery loss of 2,11% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,90%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
Siyah v3.2.4 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 2,25% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,99%
SpeedMod K3-19: Battery loss of 2,30% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,6% => loss*(1-screen): 2,03%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.4 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 2,26% per hour, Wifi: 78,1%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 79%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 2,03%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
SpeedMod K3-20: Battery loss of 2,50% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 21,1%, Deep sleep: 78%, Screen: 11,6% => loss*(1-screen): 2,21%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
Dorimanx 3.6: Battery loss of 2,95% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,6%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 2,64%
Dorimanx 3.2: Battery loss of 3,08% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,5%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 2,73%
Test results from 19.05.2012: Base ROM was XWLP8 (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
Phenomenal 5.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v3.2: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v3.2.4: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 94%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.4: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v3.2.3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v3.2.1: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-17: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 6,9%, Deep sleep: 91%
Siyah v3.1: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 6,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-15: Battery loss of 0,91% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.3: Battery loss of 0,94% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
SpeedMod K3-11: Battery loss of 0,98% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-18: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 92%
SpeedMod K3-16: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,67% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,49%
Phenomenal 5.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,73% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,5%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,55%
Phenomenal 5.3 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,69%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
SpeedMod K3-16: Battery loss of 2,04% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,8%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 11,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,81%
SpeedMod K3-18: Battery loss of 2,04% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,6%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,83%
SpeedMod K3-17: Battery loss of 2,04% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,83%
SpeedMod K3-11: Battery loss of 2,08% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,8%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
Siyah v3.1: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,5%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,89%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
Siyah v3.2.4: Battery loss of 2,25% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,99%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.4: Battery loss of 2,26% per hour, Wifi: 78,1%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 79%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 2,03%
Siyah v3.2.3: Battery loss of 2,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,6%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 11,1% => loss*(1-screen): 2,04%
Siyah v3.2.1: Battery loss of 2,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,8%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,8% => loss*(1-screen): 2,04%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.3: Battery loss of 2,75% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,8%, Deep sleep: 79%, Screen: 10,8% => loss*(1-screen): 2,45%
SpeedMod K3-15: Battery loss of 3,00% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,64%
Siyah v3.2: Battery loss of 3,35% per hour, Wifi: 91,2%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,8% => loss*(1-screen): 2,99%
Test results from 22.04.2012: Base ROM was XWLP3 (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
Phenomenal 5.1 Extreme (XWLP8): Battery loss of 0,88% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-5: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 92%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
SpeedMod K3-7: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
Siyah v3.0beta5: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 7,4%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
SpeedMod K3-11 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 0,98% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K3-9 (XWLP7): Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 1,02% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 92%
N.E.A.K. v2.0.2: Battery loss of 1,02% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 92%
Siyah v3.1beta1: Battery loss of 1,03% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 92%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
SpeedMod K3-9 (XWLP7): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
SpeedMod K3-11 (XWLP8): Battery loss of 2,08% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,8%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
SpeedMod K3-7: Battery loss of 2,12% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,1%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,88%
Siyah v3.1beta1: Battery loss of 2,17% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
Siyah v3.0beta5: Battery loss of 2,32% per hour, Wifi: 91,2%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,54% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 20,1%, Deep sleep: 79%, Screen: 10,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,26%
SpeedMod K3-5: Battery loss of 2,56% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,8%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,8% => loss*(1-screen): 2,28%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
Phenomenal 5.1 Extreme (XWLP8): Battery loss of % per hour, Wifi: %, Awake: %, Deep sleep: %, Screen: % => loss*(1-screen): %
Test results from 30.03.2012: Base ROM was XXLPQ (ICS)
Battery stats
Code:
Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v3.0beta5: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 8,4%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v3.0beta4: Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Awake: 7,8%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
Siyah v3.0beta3: Battery loss of 1,14% per hour, Awake: 8,1%, Deep sleep: 91%
Siyah v3.0beta6: Battery loss of 1,19% per hour, Awake: 8,6%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
Siyah v3.0beta7: Battery loss of 1,50% per hour, Awake: 11,4%, Deep sleep: 87%
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
Siyah v3.0beta5: Battery loss of 2,45% per hour, Wifi: 89,9%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,21%
Siyah v3.0beta3: Battery loss of 2,45% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,21%
Siyah v3.0beta6: Battery loss of 2,48% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 20,7%, Deep sleep: 79%, Screen: 10,6% => loss*(1-screen): 2,22%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
Siyah v3.0beta4: Battery loss of 2,50% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 2,24%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%

GingerBread
Test results from 20.03.2012: => Base ROM was XWLA4 (GB)
Results for SpeedMod / Phenomenal / N.E.A.K. / Siyah / RedPill / stock kernels
Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, synch (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk and Skype on.
For all custom kernels, I was running on Frankenstein XWLA4 ROM (Modem: XXKL1).
For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
For Siyah, as it has many, many configurable settings, I have changed nothing - just default settings.
For N.E.A.K. I tested VR schedule, Lulzactive governor, only enabled sched_mc (and AFTR idle mode) and the rest unchanged defaults.
For RedPill kernel, I tested completely default settings, only changed io sched to sio and governor to conservative.
Here are my current results:
Benchmarks (in Performance governor if available)
Code:
[B]Quadrant Standard (3rd run)[/B]
Phenomenal 4.0: 4780
SpeedMod K2-21: 4771
Stock XILA2 kernel: 4259
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 4076
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 4036
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 3899
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 3852
[B]Quadrant Standard 2.0 (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 4063
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 3860
Siyah v2.6.13: 3692
SpeedMod K2-21: 3576
RedPill rev1.3: 3282
Siyah v3.0beta2: 3276
[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Siyah v2.6.13: 54,2
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 54,2
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
SpeedMod K2-21: 53,5
RedPill rev1.3: 52,7
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 51,3
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 47,8
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 47,6
Phenomenal 4.0: 44,4
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 38,1
[B]Vellamo (best of 2 runs)[/B]
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 1247
Siyah v2.6.13: 1237
Stock XILA2 kernel: 1225
SpeedMod K2-21: 1224
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 1219
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 1216
Phenomenal 4.0: 1214
Stock XWKL1 kernel: 1173
RedPill rev1.3: 1172
Stock XWKK5 kernel: 1160
Stock XWKK2 kernel: 1080
[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]
Phenomenal 4.0: 57.342 / 102.346
SpeedMod K2-21: 57.224 / 98.062
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 57.302 / 95.077
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 57.816 / 93.548
Siyah v2.6.13: 57.459 / 92.572
Stock XILA2 kernel: 57.302 / 91.667
RedPill rev1.3: 57.499 / 80.663
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 48.208 / 80.013
[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Phenomenal 4.0: 11522 / 3409 / 6654
Siyah v2.6.13: 11441 / 3427 / 6632
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 11400 / 3374 / 6584
SpeedMod K2-21: 11428 / 3355 / 6584
RedPill rev1.3: 11271 / 3229 / 6445
Stock XILA2 kernel: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 10862 / 3044 / 6171
[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]
N.E.A.K. v1.4: 6177
Stock XILA2 kernel: 6110
Stock XXLPQ kernel: 6075
Siyah v2.6.13: 6012
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 6009
SpeedMod K2-21: 4986
Phenomenal 4.0: 4966
RedPill rev1.3: 4832
Battery stats
Code:
[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]
RedPill rev1.3: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 4,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 1,02% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 92%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
Siyah v2.6.13: Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Awake: 9,8%, Deep sleep: 89%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
[B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
RedPill rev1.3: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,8%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 2,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,6%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,85%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 2,26% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 2,00%
Siyah v2.6.13: Battery loss of 2,29% per hour, Wifi: 91,6%, Awake: 19,9%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,04%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%
[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)

Brilliant stuff mate.

Great work, mate..
5 stars from me, keep it up.!
Subcribed

Awesome mate. Finally all your great info in one place.
Much appreciated.
----------------------
GTI9100
Hydra H2O 1.2.1
fluxi xx.01_rc5

At last! Love your tests results and now there is a place where I can come and check . Thank you for that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Great mate!
Congrats to your first "own" thread.
Keep the results coming but don´t forget about your real life.

Finally dude, this is what I have been waiting for.
Sent from my 80GB CyanogenMOD 9 + Siyah ICS powered beast. Booya!!

Perfect. Thank you very much.
I really would like to see an experiment. Please chose one kernel and tweak it like hell with some configs here @XDA. I really like to see if the twaeking make any sense and how it impact on the battery life.

would be better if you upload the screenies
some people are too lazy to read

bluefa1con said:
would be better if you upload the screenies
some people are too lazy to read
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right ... images/graphics are much more impressive and can give a quicker overview.
But I do not want to "overload" my posts.
I will think about a "small" visualization.

lynx2k50 said:
Perfect. Thank you very much.
I really would like to see an experiment. Please chose one kernel and tweak it like hell with some configs here @XDA. I really like to see if the twaeking make any sense and how it impact on the battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good idea ... why don't you do it by yourself?
Best results are "real life" experiences on your own phone, in your region, with your settings/apps/etc.
Feel free to post your results here in this thread.

It_ler said:
You are right ... images/graphics are much more impressive and can give a quicker overview.
But I do not want to "overload" my posts.
I will think about a "small" visualization.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can hide images in spoiler tag
--Any image or text--[ /HIDE]
Just remove the space between [ and /
Ex:
--Any image or text--
Great thread BTW

A very usefull tread dude, congrats.
If you continue the test, this thread will be no.1 i guess

kunacs said:
A very usefull tread dude, congrats.
If you continue the test, this thread will be no.1 i guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although the first SGS3 are out and many SGS2 users want to "upgrade" their smartphone (heard about 9 million preorders), I am still happy with my SGS2 and will definitely continue searching for the new and best balanced kernel-ROM combination.
Sharing my results is my way to give something back to the XDA community.

Haldi's Benchmark Thread for Governors&Undervolting&Overclocking the Sony Xperia Z

Haldi's Benchmark Thread for Governors&Undervolting&Overclocking the Sony Xperia Z
Hi guys.
//EDIT:
I'm not using my Z as daily driver anymore, i own a Z2 now and therefore will only rarely on special occasion continue to make Benchmarks for the Z.
Thread for the Z2 here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2768979
/END EDIT:
After some Testing i've decided to do a lot more testing with different Governos, Undervolting, overclocking a.m.m.
To put this all together in a single Thread (because there are different ROM's and Kernels planned )
THIS THREAD IS NOT for Antutu/Quadrant/GLBenchmark results. They go here
What is a governor and how does it work?
Guide 1, Guide 2, Guide 3
Current Setup: 13.04.2014
Modified Stock rom 101 with Doomkernel v22
Old Setup: 19.01.2014
Modified Stock rom 569 with Xz Kernel v19
Benchmark Parcour:
Using the App Repetitouch to generate a custom pattern that gets repeated.
Using the App BetterBatteryStats to check most Stats like Screen on Time, CPU stats, Battery Drain.
Using Qualcomm Trepn Profiler for detailed stats about CPU/GPU
Normal:
Doing *nothing* just browsing app drawer and homescreen + a short intercourse in the web.
Connected to WiFi, 2x Active Exchange sync running + Facebook
More to come ?
You have a better idea? Whats your typical daily Routine? Web browsing only? Favortie browser? Chrome ?
Different Benchmarks:
BatteryLife:
For Batterylife Benchmarks the battery will be charged fully. A fixxed Brightness set. Benchmark runs for a certain time or till battery is empty. Make sure to use the Benchmark in the exact same location or activate Flight mode because Signal strenght might interfere.
I tried with 1h, that looks fine for a short Test. BetterBatteryStats Log saved. %dropped vom Start till end Benchmark.
CPU load:
Because there are 4 cores the CPU stats from BBS are useless. FauxClock App provides CPU stats per core, or a Trepn Profiler Log.
A short Benchmark (10mins, 30 mins, 1h or more for throttling) to see how a different governor reacts to the same conditions. Brightness should be set to a fixed amount because of heat production from the display. Battery is not important.
Impact of Trepn Profiler on CPU:
(be aware, Total State Time and NOT total run time )
This was a short test with the "normal" preset, when i booted the phone FauxClock said i had already 5 minutes CPU runtime. So better make the Test 30min-1hour for a usefull result.
Left side is without, Right side is with Trepn Profiler running
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
As you can see Trepn Profiler DOES use quite some CPU power, therefore do NOT mix Benchmarks with and without Running Trepn profile!
IF you compare Something always use same setting.
Impact of Trepn Profiler on GPU:
Still looking for a good GPU load/freq logging app. any recommendations ?
Trepn Profiler Results:
TBH this is a PITA. And not sure if really necessary. But it looks cool. I modified the .csv file in Excel from 6591 Datapoints calculated CPU load for each frequency/per core. Sadly Trepn Profiler does not log CPU/battery Temperature.
Table: Time in State. Each CPUcore has 100% divided into Active and InActive. Active is split into each frequency
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 0.41 % 2.84 % 1.35 % 0.59 %
486000 1.44 % 1.15 % 0.41 % 0.14 %
594000 2.50 % 1.74 % 0.49 % 0.06 %
702000 2.61 % 2.00 % 0.23 % 0.14 %
810000 2.49 % 1.44 % 0.44 % 0.23 %
918000 2.34 % 1.49 % 0.56 % 0.08 %
1026000 9.56 % 13.00 % 4.19 % 1.24 %
1134000 6.46 % 4.38 % 1.32 % 0.29 %
1242000 15.82 % 8.86 % 2.28 % 0.90 %
1350000 19.45 % 8.88 % 3.23 % 1.53 %
1458000 10.91 % 5.66 % 2.69 % 1.38 %
1512000 26.01 % 10.18 % 3.20 % 2.29 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 38.37 % 79.62 % 91.14 %
Aktiv 100.00 %61.63 % 20.38 % 8.86 %
Then we have a simple Graph (do not try to put all cores in one, looks horrible, there are 6591 Datapoints)
Easier for understanding and also shows the "over Time progress"
System Internal Results:
For some Kernels there is a way to use the system internal Stats! DOES NOT WORK WITH ALL KERNELS!
On the Path "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/overall-stats/" You'll find the file "overall_time_in_state" which will show the Time in state for each Core for each frequency since reboot!
Use RootBroweser or ADB to copy the file when you start Benchmarking, copy again after Benchmarking. Calculate the time inbetween /100 and you get seconds. When the core0 never goes into deep sleek /aka Screen is always On you can use the Sum of all core0 to get the 100% amount. (in my case 648 seconds aka 10 minutes 48 seconds)
This here is the SAME usage pattern (normal) as the one shown as example for Trepn Profiler!
Code:
Fre CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 20.72 % 0.84 % 0.31 % 0.20 %
486000 1.67 % 0.48 % 0.13 % 0.07 %
594000 1.82 % 0.50 % 0.06 % 0.02 %
702000 2.53 % 0.46 % 0.13 % 0.03 %
810000 3.56 % 0.77 % 0.26 % 0.05 %
918000 3.31 % 0.35 % 0.11 % 0.05 %
1026000 12.88 % 2.76 % 0.81 % 0.30 %
1134000 7.70 % 1.17 % 0.24 % 0.06 %
1242000 12.34 % 2.85 % 1.16 % 0.36 %
1350000 11.98 % 4.44 % 1.29 % 0.65 %
1458000 6.63 % 2.55 % 1.13 % 0.58 %
1512000 14.86 % 3.68 % 1.88 % 0.74 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 79.16 % 92.50 % 96.86 %
Aktiv 100.00% 20.84 % 7.50 % 3.14 %
For stats which do NOT need Over time results (=no beautiful graphs) i reccomend this methode as Trepn profiler DOES use quite a lot CPU power.
Comparison Trepn vs Internal Logger:
So to be sure that they show the same values i've redone the Test made in Trepn and InternalLog section.
Trepn Profiler: (total Log time 660 Seconds)
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 0.61 % 3.94 % 1.61 % 0.76 %
486000 1.61 % 1.81 % 0.37 % 0.12 %
594000 2.65 % 2.25 % 0.37 % 0.21 %
702000 2.98 % 2.86 % 0.35 % 0.11 %
810000 2.60 % 1.95 % 0.33 % 0.18 %
918000 2.48 % 1.46 % 0.32 % 0.12 %
1026000 9.25 % 15.14 % 2.82 % 0.70 %
1134000 6.57 % 3.47 % 0.61 % 0.23 %
1242000 15.26 % 5.40 % 1.13 % 0.18 %
1350000 19.08 % 5.48 % 1.45 % 0.35 %
1458000 10.33 % 3.73 % 1.00 % 0.32 %
1512000 26.56 % 7.50 % 1.38 % 0.44 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 45.00 % 88.27 % 96.27 %
Aktiv 100.00% 55.00 % 11.73 % 3.73 %
Internal Log file: (total Log time 684 Seconds)
Code:
Fre CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 1.33 % 1.54 % 0.71 % 0.19 %
486000 1.75 % 1.32 % 0.25 % 0.06 %
594000 3.08 % 1.64 % 0.30 % 0.13 %
702000 3.04 % 2.32 % 0.30 % 0.11 %
810000 2.86 % 1.64 % 0.22 % 0.08 %
918000 2.63 % 1.28 % 0.23 % 0.11 %
1026000 9.58 % 12.76 % 1.84 % 0.58 %
1134000 6.41 % 3.07 % 0.31 % 0.07 %
1242000 14.64 % 5.41 % 0.85 % 0.18 %
1350000 18.55 % 5.50 % 0.96 % 0.31 %
1458000 9.95 % 3.63 % 0.79 % 0.21 %
1512000 26.18 % 7.85 % 1.49 % 0.36 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 52.04 % 91.76 % 97.62 %
Aktiv 100.00% 47.96 % 8.24 % 2.38 %
There is a difference in the results, altough not too big. This comes from the different recording methods. Trepn profiler is poling the CPU every (ca) 100ms an asking what clock the CPU has, and the Internal method... i have no idea!
I reccomend using the internal method to not create more than necessary CPU(and GPU) load
Except you really have a long Task and whant to see where the CPU was heavy loaded and when it was idle!
More?
That's about it. Feel free to comment and contribute.
I'll add more if i have an idea what else could be noteworth.
greets,
Haldi

List:
Benchmark NR 1-4 (Post #3) ; Testing how Profiling runs, and batterylife with Trepn Profiler running.
Governortest NR 1-9 (Post #4); Testing different Core Hotplug divers (showP, Intelli-plug, MP-decision)
Conclusion Core Hotplug drivers (Post #6)
Governortest NR 9-18 (Post #7) ; Testing all governors under the same conditions
Conclusion Governor Tests (Post #8)
Benchmark NR 9-17 (Post #9) ; batterylife tests for each governor
Conclusion BatteryLife (Post #10)
Governor Test NR 31-36 ( Post #17) ; Doomkernel v22 with MP-Decision by Qualcomm
Governor Test NR 37-42 (Post #19) ; Doomkernel v22 with IntelliPlug
Governor Test NR 43-44 Post #20 ; Eco Modus! 2 Cores only
Battery Test NR 46-47 Post #24 ; 100% Screen Birghtness!
Battery Test NR 48 Post #26 ; Performance gov, 100% Screen Brightness!
Fulltime Battery Test Post #33 ; No SIM card!
Governor Test NR 54-58 Post #34 ; XzKernel v25
GPU tests Post #36 ; XZKernel v25
Governor tests with XzKernel v25b Preservative and Interactive Post #39
How the Hell are you making these graphs? a Screencast from Excel Post #40
Governor tests with XzKernel v25 Interactive and Idle Post #41
The answer to life the universe and everything Post #42
Governor tests with Profiles from XzKernelApp Post #43 ; XzKernel v25
Governor tests with Profiles from XzKernelApp Post #44 ; XzKernel v25b (Hotplug disabled)
Throttling Stock and set to 60°C Post #46
Charging the Device in Dock with Sony EP880 Charger Post #47
Charging with the Aukey PA-U28 Charger! It's faster. Post #50

Benchmark NR 1:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler running.
1h Test, "normal" preset, 100% Screen Brightness
Running from 94% to 64% Battery
BBS Log: Lost sorry
Benchmark NR 2:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler running.
1h Test, "normal" preset, 100% Screen Brightness
Running from 96% to 64% Battery
BBS Log:
===================
General Information
===================
BetterBatteryStats version: 1.15.0.0_RC4
Creation Date: 2014-01-18 01:32:54
Statistic Type: Custom to Current
Since 1 h 1 m 52 s
VERSION.RELEASE: 4.3
BRAND: Sony
DEVICE: C6603
MANUFACTURER: Sony
MODEL: C6603
OS.VERSION: 3.4.76-XzK-v18_5+
BOOTLOADER: s1
HARDWARE: qcom
FINGERPRINT: Sony/C6603_1270-7689/C6603:4.3/10.4.B.0.569/xr3_rQ:user/release-keys
ID: 10.4.B.0.569
TAGS: release-keys
USER: BuildUser
PRODUCT: C6603_1270-7689
RADIO: 9x15A-ACEFWMAZQ-30110082-51
Rooted: true
============
Battery Info
============
Level lost [%]: Bat.: -30% (94% to 64%) [29.1%/h]
Voltage lost [mV]: (3980-3793) [181.6%/h]
===========
Other Usage
===========
Awake (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Screen On (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Wifi On (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Wifi Running (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No Data Connection (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No or Unknown Signal (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Screen bright (): 1 h 1 m 52 s (3712 s) Ratio: 100.0%
=========
Wakelocks
=========
ActivityManager-Launch (Android System): 1 m 25 s (85 s) Count:193 2.3%
AudioOut_2 (1013): 25 s (25 s) Count:2 0.7%
*vibrator* (Android System): 17 s (17 s) Count:533 0.4%
MAIL_SERVICE (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 8 s (8 s) Count:21 0.2%
AlarmManager (Android System): 4 s (4 s) Count:611 0.1%
RILJ (Telefon): 1 s (1 s) Count:17 0.0%
================
Kernel Wakelocks
================
======================
Alarms (requires root)
======================
com.facebook.katana (): Wakeups: 7
Alarms: 6, Intent: com.facebook.push.mqtt.KeepaliveManager.ACTION_INE XACT_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 0, Intent: JewelCountFetcher.INITIATE_BACKGROUND_FETCH cmp={com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.notifications.util.JewelCountFetcher$ JewelCountBroadcastReceiver}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.ui.media.cache.MediaCacheCleanupServi ce}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.common.tempfile.TempFileCleanupServic e}
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.facebook.common.executors.WakingExecutorServic e.ACTION_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.facebook.katana.service.202p cmp={com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.katana.service.FacebookService}
com.google.android.gms (): Wakeups: 5
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.google.android.gms/com.google.android.gms.playlog.uploader.UploaderAl armReceiver}
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
Alarms: 4, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.MCS_HEARTBEAT
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.GCM_RECONNECT
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.gms.icing.INDEX_RECURRING_MAINT ENANCE cmp={com.google.android.gms/com.google.android.gms.icing.service.IndexWorkerSe rvice}
com.android.exchange (): Wakeups: 4
Alarms: 4, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.EmailSyncAlarmReceiver}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.MailboxAlarmReceiver}
com.google.android.gsf (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
Alarms: 3, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.EventLogService$Rec eiver}
android (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 0, Intent: android.intent.action.TIME_TICK
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.server.action.NETWORK_STATS_POLL
Alarms: 0, Intent: android.content.syncmanager.SYNC_ALARM
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.app.backup.intent.RUN
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindowManage r.DELAYED_KEYGUARD
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.server.IdleMaintenanceService.action.U PDATE_IDLE_MAINTENANCE_STATE
com.sonyericsson.organizer (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: timer_expired
======================
Network (requires root)
======================
10206 (Wifi) (com.dolphin.browser.Dolphin Browser Mini): 1.0 MBytes 62.7%
10201 (Wifi) (org.leetzone.android.yatsewidgetfree.Yatse): 524.0 KBytes 21.0%
0 (Wifi) (0): 204.0 KBytes 8.2%
10199 (Wifi) (com.synology.DSfile.DS file): 114.0 KBytes 4.6%
10050 (Wifi) (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 48.0 KBytes 2.0%
10173 (Wifi) (com.facebook.katana.Facebook): 21.0 KBytes 0.8%
10114 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.organizer.Uhr): 10.0 KBytes 0.4%
10042 (Wifi) (Xperiaâ„¢ Home): 5.0 KBytes 0.2%
10192 (Wifi) (com.asksven.betterbatterystats_xdaedition.BetterB atteryStats): 2.0 KBytes 0.1%
10060 (Wifi) (Google Play-Dienste): 916.0 Bytes 0.0%
==========
CPU States
==========
384 MHz (): 1 m 9 s 1.9%
486 MHz (): 1 m 12 s 1.9%
594 MHz (): 1 m 55 s 3.1%
702 MHz (): 2 m 8 s 3.5%
810 MHz (): 2 m 1 s 3.3%
918 MHz (): 1 m 43 s 2.8%
1.03 GHz (): 8 m 51 s 14.3%
1.13 GHz (): 6 m 44 s 10.9%
1.24 GHz (): 10 m 39 s 17.2%
1.35 GHz (): 7 m 49 s 12.6%
1.46 GHz (): 4 m 48 s 7.8%
1.51 GHz (): 12 m 49 s 20.7%
==================
Reference overview
==================
ref_boot: Reference ref_boot created 54 s (Wl: 3 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 12 elements; Alrm: 0 elements; Proc: 2 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 12 elements)
ref_unplugged: Reference ref_unplugged created 5 h 6 m 26 s (Wl: 0 elements; KWl: 22elements; NetS: 31 elements; Alrm: 11 elements; Proc: 0 elements; Oth: 8 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
ref_custom: Reference ref_custom created 5 h 13 m 50 s (Wl: 8 elements; KWl: 22elements; NetS: 34 elements; Alrm: 10 elements; Proc: 18 elements; Oth: 9 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
ref_current: Reference ref_current created 6 h 15 m 43 s (Wl: 10 elements; KWl: 22elements; NetS: 34 elements; Alrm: 11 elements; Proc: 47 elements; Oth: 9 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
Benchmark NR 3:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand, Trepn Profiler running.
1h Test, "normal" preset, 100% Screen Brightness
Undervolted CPU: 384 to 700mv, 1024 to 900mv and 1512 to 1050mv
Running from 95% to 68% Battery
BBS Log:
===================
General Information
===================
BetterBatteryStats version: 1.15.0.0_RC4
Creation Date: 2014-01-18 23:09:38
Statistic Type: Custom to Current
Since 58 m 30 s
VERSION.RELEASE: 4.3
BRAND: Sony
DEVICE: C6603
MANUFACTURER: Sony
MODEL: C6603
OS.VERSION: 3.4.76-XzK-v18_5+
BOOTLOADER: s1
HARDWARE: qcom
FINGERPRINT: Sony/C6603_1270-7689/C6603:4.3/10.4.B.0.569/xr3_rQ:user/release-keys
ID: 10.4.B.0.569
TAGS: release-keys
USER: BuildUser
PRODUCT: C6603_1270-7689
RADIO: 9x15A-ACEFWMAZQ-30110082-51
Rooted: true
============
Battery Info
============
Level lost [%]: Bat.: -27% (95% to 68%) [27.8%/h]
Voltage lost [mV]: (4032-3912) [123.7%/h]
===========
Other Usage
===========
Deep Sleep (): 1 m 1 s (61 s) Ratio: 1.7%
Awake (): 57 m 29 s (3449 s) Ratio: 98.3%
Screen On (): 56 m 31 s (3391 s) Ratio: 96.6%
Wifi On (): 58 m 30 s (3510 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Wifi Running (): 58 m 30 s (3510 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No Data Connection (): 58 m 30 s (3510 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No or Unknown Signal (): 58 m 30 s (3510 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Screen dark (): 7 s (7 s) Ratio: 0.2%
Screen bright (): 56 m 23 s (3383 s) Ratio: 96.4%
=========
Wakelocks
=========
ActivityManager-Launch (Android System): 1 m 15 s (75 s) Count:166 2.1%
*vibrator* (Android System): 25 s (25 s) Count:521 0.7%
AudioOut_2 (1013): 13 s (13 s) Count:4 0.4%
MAIL_SERVICE (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 5 s (5 s) Count:15 0.2%
*backup* (Android System): 4 s (4 s) Count:614 0.1%
AlarmManager (Android System): 4 s (4 s) Count:605 0.1%
AudioOut_3 (1013): 3 s (3 s) Count:2 0.1%
AlarmManager (com.facebook.katana.Facebook): 1 s (1 s) Count:74 0.0%
SCREEN_FROZEN (Android System): 1 s (1 s) Count:227 0.0%
show keyguard (Android System): 1 s (1 s) Count:2 0.0%
GOOGLE_C2DM (Google Play-Dienste): 1 s (1 s) Count:66 0.0%
================
Kernel Wakelocks
================
"mmc1_detect" (): 25 s (25 s) Cntc/wc/ec)92/0/0 0.7%
"qcom_rx_wakelock" (): 12 s (12 s) Cntc/wc/ec)4990/0/4990 0.4%
"PowerManagerService.WakeLocks" (): 7 s (7 s) Cntc/wc/ec)671/0/0 0.2%
"suspend_backoff" (): 7 s (7 s) Cntc/wc/ec)1/0/1 0.2%
"alarm_rtc" (): 6 s (6 s) Cntc/wc/ec)7/0/0 0.2%
"power-supply" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)192/33/0 0.0%
"msm_hsic_host" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)18/0/0 0.0%
"alarm" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)233/0/0 0.0%
"pm8921_soc_lock" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)174/0/0 0.0%
"KeyEvents" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)63641/0/0 0.0%
"PowerManagerService.Broadcasts" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)2/0/0 0.0%
"PowerManagerService.Display" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)1/0/0 0.0%
"system_monitor" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)28/0/0 0.0%
"libsysmon_wq" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)16/0/0 0.0%
"mmc0_detect" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)106/0/1 0.0%
"bl_ctrl_wq" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)18/0/0 0.0%
======================
Alarms (requires root)
======================
com.facebook.katana (): Wakeups: 60
Alarms: 59, Intent: com.facebook.push.mqtt.KeepaliveManager.ACTION_INE XACT_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.facebook.common.executors.WakingExecutorServic e.ACTION_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.ui.media.cache.MediaCacheCleanupServi ce}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.common.tempfile.TempFileCleanupServic e}
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.facebook.orca.database.ACTION_ALARM cmp={com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.contacts.database.AddressBookPeriodic Runner$LocalBroadcastReceiver}
com.google.android.gms (): Wakeups: 4
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.GCM_RECONNECT
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
Alarms: 3, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.MCS_HEARTBEAT
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.google.android.gms/com.google.android.gms.playlog.uploader.UploaderAl armReceiver}
com.android.exchange (): Wakeups: 4
Alarms: 3, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.EmailSyncAlarmReceiver}
Alarms: 1, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.MailboxAlarmReceiver}
android (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 0, Intent: android.intent.action.TIME_TICK
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.server.action.NETWORK_STATS_POLL
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.content.syncmanager.SYNC_ALARM
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindowManage r.DELAYED_KEYGUARD
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.app.backup.intent.RUN
com.google.android.gsf (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
Alarms: 2, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.EventLogService$Rec eiver}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.CheckinService$Rece iver}
com.sonyericsson.organizer (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: timer_expired
======================
Network (requires root)
======================
10206 (Wifi) (com.dolphin.browser.Dolphin Browser Mini): 1.0 MBytes 52.4%
10201 (Wifi) (org.leetzone.android.yatsewidgetfree.Yatse): 680.0 KBytes 22.9%
0 (Wifi) (0): 482.0 KBytes 16.2%
10078 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.android.locationbasedwifi.Ortsbe zogenes Wi-Fi): 96.0 KBytes 3.2%
10050 (Wifi) (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 48.0 KBytes 1.6%
10098 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.android.socialphonebook.Kontakte ): 26.0 KBytes 0.9%
10173 (Wifi) (com.facebook.katana.Facebook): 16.0 KBytes 0.5%
10042 (Wifi) (Xperiaâ„¢ Home): 13.0 KBytes 0.5%
10156 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.updatecenter.Update Center): 9.0 KBytes 0.3%
10118 (Wifi) (com.android.email.E-Mail): 8.0 KBytes 0.3%
10060 (Wifi) (Google Play-Dienste): 8.0 KBytes 0.3%
1000 (Wifi) (Android System): 6.0 KBytes 0.2%
10044 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.conversations.SMS/MMS): 5.0 KBytes 0.2%
10198 (Wifi) (com.whatsapp.WhatsApp): 4.0 KBytes 0.2%
10216 (Wifi) (com.oasisfeng.greenify.Greenify): 3.0 KBytes 0.1%
10099 (Wifi) (com.android.vending.Google Play Store): 2.0 KBytes 0.1%
10192 (Wifi) (com.asksven.betterbatterystats_xdaedition.BetterB atteryStats): 1.0 KBytes 0.0%
10082 (Wifi) (com.sonymobile.mx.android.myÂ*Xperia): 267.0 Bytes 0.0%
10052 (Wifi) (UID): 52.0 Bytes 0.0%
10061 (Wifi) (com.google.android.syncadapters.calendar.Google Kalender synchronisieren): 52.0 Bytes 0.0%
10059 (Wifi) (com.google.android.gm.Gmail): 52.0 Bytes 0.0%
10169 (Wifi) (com.google.android.youtube.YouTube): 52.0 Bytes 0.0%
10181 (Wifi) (com.sony.snei.np.android.account.Account Manager): 52.0 Bytes 0.0%
==========
CPU States
==========
162 MHz (): 0.0%
270 MHz (): 9 s 0.3%
378 MHz (): 42 s 1.2%
384 MHz (): 1 s 0.1%
486 MHz (): 1 m 10 s 2.0%
594 MHz (): 1 m 40 s 2.9%
702 MHz (): 1 m 43 s 3.0%
810 MHz (): 1 m 39 s 2.8%
918 MHz (): 1 m 27 s 2.5%
1.03 GHz (): 5 m 20 s 9.1%
1.13 GHz (): 3 m 46 s 6.5%
1.24 GHz (): 7 m 59 s 13.7%
1.35 GHz (): 9 m 48 s 16.8%
1.46 GHz (): 5 m 50 s 10.0%
1.51 GHz (): 16 m 7 s 27.6%
Deep Sleep (): 1 m 1 s 1.7%
==================
Reference overview
==================
ref_boot: Reference ref_boot created 56 s (Wl: 4 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 7 elements; Alrm: 0 elements; Proc: 1 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 12 elements)
ref_custom: Reference ref_custom created 5 m 51 s (Wl: 19 elements; KWl: 11elements; NetS: 18 elements; Alrm: 8 elements; Proc: 31 elements; Oth: 11 elements; CPU: 16 elements)
ref_current: Reference ref_current created 1 h 4 m 22 s (Wl: 24 elements; KWl: 16elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 9 elements; Proc: 67 elements; Oth: 12 elements; CPU: 16 elements)
Benchmark NR 4:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler running.
1h Test, "normal" preset, Minimum Screen Brightness
Running from 98% to 74% Battery
BBS Log:
===================
General Information
===================
BetterBatteryStats version: 1.15.0.0_RC4
Creation Date: 2014-01-19 13:56:16
Statistic Type: Custom to Current
Since 1 h 7 s
VERSION.RELEASE: 4.3
BRAND: Sony
DEVICE: C6603
MANUFACTURER: Sony
MODEL: C6603
OS.VERSION: 3.4.76-XzK-v18_5+
BOOTLOADER: s1
HARDWARE: qcom
FINGERPRINT: Sony/C6603_1270-7689/C6603:4.3/10.4.B.0.569/xr3_rQ:user/release-keys
ID: 10.4.B.0.569
TAGS: release-keys
USER: BuildUser
PRODUCT: C6603_1270-7689
RADIO: 9x15A-ACEFWMAZQ-30110082-51
Rooted: true
============
Battery Info
============
Level lost [%]: Bat.: -24% (98% to 74%) [24.0%/h]
Voltage lost [mV]: (4057-3857) [200.0%/h]
===========
Other Usage
===========
Awake (): 1 h 7 s (3607 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Wifi On (): 1 h 7 s (3607 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Wifi Running (): 1 h 7 s (3607 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No Data Connection (): 1 h 7 s (3607 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No or Unknown Signal (): 1 h 7 s (3607 s) Ratio: 100.0%
=========
Wakelocks
=========
ActivityManager-Launch (Android System): 1 m 22 s (82 s) Count:206 2.3%
DownloadManager (Medien): 20 s (20 s) Count:2 0.5%
AudioOut_2 (1013): 18 s (18 s) Count:7 0.5%
*vibrator* (Android System): 16 s (16 s) Count:496 0.4%
*backup* (Android System): 10 s (10 s) Count:516 0.3%
MAIL_SERVICE (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 9 s (9 s) Count:18 0.3%
AlarmManager (Android System): 4 s (4 s) Count:592 0.1%
AudioOut_3 (1013): 4 s (4 s) Count:3 0.1%
QcConnectivityService (Android System): 3 s (3 s) Count:518 0.1%
GOOGLE_C2DM (Google Play-Dienste): 2 s (2 s) Count:62 0.1%
*sync*_com.sonyericsson.updatecenter.provider_Account {name=d42f445179deb21f4073591d371e995a, type=com.sonyericsson.updatecenter.account.default} (com.sonyericsson.updatecenter.Update Center): 1 s (1 s) Count:1 0.0%
================
Kernel Wakelocks
================
======================
Alarms (requires root)
======================
com.facebook.katana (): Wakeups: 12
Alarms: 11, Intent: com.facebook.push.mqtt.KeepaliveManager.ACTION_INEXACT_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.facebook.common.executors.WakingExecutorService.ACTION_ALARM.com.facebook.katana
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.ui.media.cache.MediaCacheCleanupService}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.common.tempfile.TempFileCleanupService}
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.facebook.katana.service.202p cmp={com.facebook.katana/com.facebook.katana.service.FacebookService}
android (): Wakeups: 7
Alarms: 0, Intent: android.intent.action.TIME_TICK
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.server.action.NETWORK_STATS_POLL
Alarms: 6, Intent: android.content.syncmanager.SYNC_ALARM
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.app.backup.intent.RUN
com.google.android.gms (): Wakeups: 4
Alarms: 3, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.MCS_HEARTBEAT
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.GCM_RECONNECT
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.google.android.gms/com.google.android.gms.playlog.uploader.UploaderAlarmReceiver}
com.android.providers.calendar (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.intent.action.EVENT_REMINDER
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.android.providers.calendar.intent.CalendarProvider2
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.android.providers.calendar.SCHEDULE_ALARM cmp={com.android.providers.calendar/com.android.providers.calendar.CalendarReceiver}
com.android.exchange (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 3, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.EmailSyncAlarmReceiver}
com.android.vending (): Wakeups: 3
Alarms: 2, Intent: {com.android.vending/com.google.android.finsky.services.ContentSyncService}
Alarms: 1, Intent: {com.android.vending/com.google.android.finsky.services.DailyHygiene}
com.google.android.gsf (): Wakeups: 2
Alarms: 2, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.EventLogService$Receiver}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.CheckinService$Receiver}
com.sonyericsson.organizer (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: timer_expired
com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: clear_dirty_flag cmp={com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod/com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod.ReceiverGenerals}
======================
Network (requires root)
======================
10206 (Wifi) (com.dolphin.browser.Dolphin Browser Mini): 1.0 MBytes 41.8%
10099 (Wifi) (com.android.vending.Google Play Store): 766.0 KBytes 20.8%
10201 (Wifi) (org.leetzone.android.yatsewidgetfree.Yatse): 746.0 KBytes 20.3%
0 (Wifi) (0): 289.0 KBytes 7.9%
10078 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.android.locationbasedwifi.Ortsbezogenes Wi-Fi): 98.0 KBytes 2.7%
10050 (Wifi) (com.android.exchange.Exchange Services): 75.0 KBytes 2.0%
10173 (Wifi) (com.facebook.katana.Facebook): 66.0 KBytes 1.8%
10098 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.android.socialphonebook.Kontakte): 26.0 KBytes 0.7%
10042 (Wifi) (Xperiaâ„¢ Home): 13.0 KBytes 0.4%
10118 (Wifi) (com.android.email.E-Mail): 10.0 KBytes 0.3%
10060 (Wifi) (Google Play-Dienste): 10.0 KBytes 0.3%
10156 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.updatecenter.Update Center): 9.0 KBytes 0.2%
1000 (Wifi) (Android System): 7.0 KBytes 0.2%
10198 (Wifi) (com.whatsapp.WhatsApp): 6.0 KBytes 0.2%
10044 (Wifi) (com.sonyericsson.conversations.SMS/MMS): 5.0 KBytes 0.2%
10192 (Wifi) (com.asksven.betterbatterystats_xdaedition.BetterBatteryStats): 2.0 KBytes 0.1%
10212 (Wifi) (com.bigeyes0x0.trickstermod.Trickster MOD): 2.0 KBytes 0.1%
10169 (Wifi) (com.google.android.youtube.YouTube): 1.0 KBytes 0.0%
10052 (Wifi) (UID): 183.0 Bytes 0.0%
10061 (Wifi) (com.google.android.syncadapters.calendar.Google Kalender synchronisieren): 104.0 Bytes 0.0%
10059 (Wifi) (com.google.android.gm.Gmail): 104.0 Bytes 0.0%
10047 (Wifi) (Medien): 92.0 Bytes 0.0%
==========
CPU States
==========
162 MHz (): 2 s 0.1%
270 MHz (): 8 s 0.2%
378 MHz (): 28 s 0.8%
384 MHz (): 2 s 0.1%
486 MHz (): 1 m 19 s 2.2%
594 MHz (): 1 m 52 s 3.1%
702 MHz (): 1 m 58 s 3.3%
810 MHz (): 1 m 49 s 3.0%
918 MHz (): 1 m 28 s 2.4%
1.03 GHz (): 5 m 32 s 9.2%
1.13 GHz (): 3 m 40 s 6.1%
1.24 GHz (): 8 m 15 s 13.7%
1.35 GHz (): 10 m 17 s 17.1%
1.46 GHz (): 6 m 4 s 10.1%
1.51 GHz (): 17 m 7 s 28.5%
==================
Reference overview
==================
ref_boot: Reference ref_boot created 58 s (Wl: 1 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 8 elements; Alrm: 0 elements; Proc: 1 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 12 elements)
ref_custom: Reference ref_custom created 2 m 41 s (Wl: 16 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 17 elements; Alrm: 6 elements; Proc: 23 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 15 elements)
ref_current: Reference ref_current created 1 h 2 m 49 s (Wl: 23 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 9 elements; Proc: 62 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 15 elements)
Trepn Log:
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 0.06 % 3.30 % 1.53 % 0.73 %
486000 2.03 % 1.57 % 0.42 % 0.12 %
594000 2.88 % 1.84 % 0.43 % 0.09 %
702000 3.00 % 2.05 % 0.39 % 0.09 %
810000 2.78 % 1.69 % 0.33 % 0.05 %
918000 2.12 % 1.26 % 0.23 % 0.04 %
1026000 8.49 % 13.26 % 3.01 % 0.92 %
1134000 6.26 % 3.88 % 0.68 % 0.08 %
1242000 14.27 % 5.99 % 1.06 % 0.24 %
1350000 17.70 % 5.78 % 1.24 % 0.36 %
1458000 10.22 % 3.75 % 1.06 % 0.29 %
1512000 29.46 % 7.33 % 1.74 % 0.51 %
InAktiv 0.72 % 48.30 % 87.87 % 96.47 %
Aktiv 99.28 % 51.70 % 12.13 % 3.53 %

GovernorTest NR1:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm +showP MP-decision activated.
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 20.72 % 0.84 % 0.31 % 0.20 %
486000 1.67 % 0.48 % 0.13 % 0.07 %
594000 1.82 % 0.50 % 0.06 % 0.02 %
702000 2.53 % 0.46 % 0.13 % 0.03 %
810000 3.56 % 0.77 % 0.26 % 0.05 %
918000 3.31 % 0.35 % 0.11 % 0.05 %
1026000 12.88 % 2.76 % 0.81 % 0.30 %
1134000 7.70 % 1.17 % 0.24 % 0.06 %
1242000 12.34 % 2.85 % 1.16 % 0.36 %
1350000 11.98 % 4.44 % 1.29 % 0.65 %
1458000 6.63 % 2.55 % 1.13 % 0.58 %
1512000 14.86 % 3.68 % 1.88 % 0.74 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 79.16 % 92.50 % 96.86 %
Aktiv 100.00% 20.84 % 7.50 % 3.14 %
GovernorTest NR2:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision activated.
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 22.47 % 0.89 % 0.37 % 0.12 %
486000 1.92 % 0.32 % 0.17 % 0.01 %
594000 2.45 % 0.42 % 0.11 % 0.03 %
702000 2.98 % 0.32 % 0.08 % 0.04 %
810000 3.84 % 0.55 % 0.13 % 0.00 %
918000 3.16 % 0.34 % 0.04 % 0.00 %
1026000 14.00 % 1.44 % 0.43 % 0.18 %
1134000 8.34 % 0.36 % 0.07 % 0.00 %
1242000 10.93 % 0.71 % 0.28 % 0.01 %
1350000 10.45 % 1.27 % 0.27 % 0.01 %
1458000 5.10 % 1.66 % 0.23 % 0.06 %
1512000 14.37 % 2.69 % 0.51 % 0.04 %
InAktiv 0.00 89.03 97.30 99.48
Aktiv 100.00% 10.97 % 2.70 % 0.52 %
GovernorTest NR3:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Intelli-Plug activated.
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 29.66 % 16.62 % 8.74 % 3.27 %
486000 2.80 % 2.14 % 0.73 % 0.37 %
594000 3.20 % 1.65 % 0.65 % 0.21 %
702000 3.42 % 0.97 % 0.41 % 0.09 %
810000 3.75 % 0.58 % 0.25 % 0.07 %
918000 2.22 % 0.38 % 0.11 % 0.12 %
1026000 20.20 % 12.01 % 6.69 % 2.83 %
1134000 6.09 % 1.07 % 0.28 % 0.04 %
1242000 8.97 % 2.72 % 0.70 % 0.09 %
1350000 7.27 % 1.38 % 0.80 % 0.21 %
1458000 3.76 % 1.84 % 0.83 % 0.32 %
1512000 8.66 % 2.86 % 1.16 % 0.47 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 55.78 % 78.66 % 91.91 %
Aktiv 100.00% 44.22 % 21.34 % 8.09 %
GovernorTest NR4:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v18.5
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control activated. (settings Part1 & Part2)
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 29.87 % 8.47 % 1.70 % 0.07 %
486000 2.77 % 2.36 % 0.47 % 0.02 %
594000 2.64 % 2.24 % 0.22 % 0.00 %
702000 2.84 % 1.50 % 0.23 % 0.03 %
810000 2.86 % 0.79 % 0.04 % 0.03 %
918000 2.25 % 0.61 % 0.11 % 0.05 %
1026000 18.92 % 18.01 % 2.95 % 0.19 %
1134000 5.56 % 1.17 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1242000 9.41 % 2.39 % 0.25 % 0.04 %
1350000 8.58 % 2.42 % 0.43 % 0.03 %
1458000 5.01 % 2.13 % 0.34 % 0.12 %
1512000 9.29 % 3.05 % 0.82 % 0.24 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 54.87 % 92.31 % 99.18 %
Aktiv 100.00% 45.13 % 7.69 % 0.82 %
GovernorTest NR5:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected]400mhz ondemand,Trepn Profiler running but not logging. showP MP-decision-control activated. (settings Part1 & Part2)
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 30.71 % 10.42 % 2.19 % 0.24 %
486000 3.78 % 3.50 % 0.67 % 0.15 %
594000 2.97 % 3.32 % 0.39 % 0.10 %
702000 2.72 % 2.86 % 0.41 % 0.01 %
810000 2.31 % 1.43 % 0.14 % 0.02 %
918000 1.62 % 0.79 % 0.13 % 0.01 %
1026000 21.58 % 23.88 % 3.28 % 0.74 %
1134000 5.57 % 1.97 % 0.12 % 0.10 %
1242000 8.92 % 3.50 % 0.40 % 0.05 %
1350000 7.41 % 3.57 % 0.38 % 0.09 %
1458000 4.14 % 2.56 % 0.53 % 0.11 %
1512000 8.25 % 4.13 % 0.85 % 0.30 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 38.08 % 90.51 % 98.07 %
Aktiv 100.00% 61.92 % 9.49 % 1.93 %
GovernorTest NR6:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected]400mhz ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control activated. (settings Part1 & Part2) Frequency Range increased from 162 to 1728mhz (Error! Only stuck to core0)
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
162000 20.70 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
270000 5.96 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
378000 4.48 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
384000 0.12 % 13.34 % 2.17 % 0.30 %
486000 4.14 % 2.79 % 0.70 % 0.13 %
594000 3.46 % 2.74 % 0.41 % 0.05 %
702000 3.00 % 2.24 % 0.31 % 0.05 %
810000 2.31 % 1.33 % 0.19 % 0.01 %
918000 2.18 % 0.72 % 0.15 % 0.01 %
1026000 19.86 % 17.58 % 3.23 % 0.37 %
1134000 4.65 % 1.44 % 0.12 % 0.00 %
1242000 3.23 % 3.31 % 0.32 % 0.12 %
1350000 2.06 % 3.37 % 0.60 % 0.13 %
1458000 4.33 % 1.99 % 0.71 % 0.21 %
1512000 4.73 % 4.07 % 1.07 % 0.35 %
1620000 6.12 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1728000 8.65 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 45.08 % 90.01 % 98.26 %
Aktiv 100.00% 54.92 % 9.99 % 1.74 %
GovernorTest NR7:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected]400mhz ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control activated. (settings Part1 & Part2) Frequency Range increased from 162 to 1728mhz (Error! Only stuck to core0)
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset, done while charging in Dock
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
162000 16.52 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
270000 5.83 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
378000 4.18 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
384000 0.18 % 11.31 % 2.32 % 0.11 %
486000 3.76 % 3.24 % 0.69 % 0.03 %
594000 3.71 % 3.39 % 0.56 % 0.00 %
702000 2.73 % 2.67 % 0.30 % 0.06 %
810000 2.12 % 1.47 % 0.10 % 0.05 %
918000 1.80 % 0.62 % 0.23 % 0.05 %
1026000 21.66 % 22.72 % 3.90 % 0.16 %
1134000 6.00 % 2.33 % 0.08 % 0.01 %
1242000 3.66 % 4.00 % 0.26 % 0.10 %
1350000 2.16 % 4.07 % 0.61 % 0.19 %
1458000 5.29 % 3.01 % 0.55 % 0.21 %
1512000 5.43 % 4.43 % 1.26 % 0.78 %
1620000 6.09 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1728000 8.87 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 36.74 % 89.15 % 98.24 %
Aktiv 100.00% 63.26 % 10.85 % 1.76 %
GovernorTest NR8:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor, [email protected]400mhz ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2) + Intelliplug activated. (yeah... somewhat fail Test) still tought i'd share it here
10Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 31.60 % 13.76 % 8.99 % 4.49 %
486000 2.86 % 1.76 % 0.93 % 0.30 %
594000 2.79 % 1.68 % 0.64 % 0.38 %
702000 2.74 % 1.02 % 0.35 % 0.23 %
810000 3.32 % 0.59 % 0.32 % 0.12 %
918000 2.39 % 0.36 % 0.15 % 0.22 %
1026000 18.27 % 11.31 % 6.37 % 3.27 %
1134000 5.81 % 0.91 % 0.05 % 0.08 %
1242000 9.24 % 1.79 % 1.13 % 0.16 %
1350000 7.35 % 2.01 % 0.70 % 0.40 %
1458000 3.98 % 1.42 % 0.74 % 0.25 %
1512000 9.65 % 2.43 % 1.64 % 0.81 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 60.96 % 77.99 % 89.29 %
Aktiv 100.00% 39.04 % 22.01 % 10.71 %

Hey man. Good job with the thread. Will follow this. Also in XzK-19 the GPU no longer over clocks. So it's at 400 not 450
Sent from my C6603

Took Test NR 2-4 and put them all together in one Chart!
It Looks horrible i know -.- Any better idea what type of chart would be usefull ?
I don't think there is a 3 Dimensional Pie chart ? And i'd had to use that for eacht core... so won't work either.
This is a simple "Added" Bar which shows which frequency takes which part.
But for overall visibility it's kinda usefull.
Observation 1:
Qualcomm Mostly works on core0. Only 10% Core1. Core1 has the same 1512mhz time than Intelli-Plug and showP
Observation 2:
Intelli-Plug has less 1512mhz time than Qualcomm and similar to showP on core0. There is a LOT of 384mhz idle time on all 4 cores. There is a lot of Boost (1026mhz) time on all 4 cores. Core2 and Core3 are long active.
Observation 3:
ShowP has similar usage pattern on core0 like Intelli-Plug. Core1 does not have so much 385mhz time but more 1026mhz time. Core2 and Core3 are rarely used!
From a BatterySaving aspect i cannot say which one would be the best. Qualcomm surely sucks because its so long on 1512mhz.
but the Intelli-plug and showP 1026mhz time is roughly the same! Now is the question does the long 384mhz time on intelliplug use more battery than the faster times on showP ?

GovernorTest NR9:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 29.27 % 5.62 % 1.09 % 0.28 %
486000 3.10 % 2.82 % 0.22 % 0.08 %
594000 2.93 % 2.05 % 0.21 % 0.03 %
702000 2.78 % 1.82 % 0.17 % 0.03 %
810000 3.03 % 1.16 % 0.10 % 0.05 %
918000 1.99 % 0.47 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1026000 20.71 % 17.07 % 1.98 % 0.11 %
1134000 5.51 % 1.43 % 0.03 % 0.03 %
1242000 8.76 % 3.15 % 0.06 % 0.04 %
1350000 7.41 % 2.34 % 0.23 % 0.02 %
1458000 4.48 % 2.34 % 0.20 % 0.12 %
1512000 10.04 % 4.02 % 0.46 % 0.43 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 55.71 % 95.17 % 98.79 %
Aktiv 100.00% 44.29 % 4.83 % 1.21 %
GovernorTest NR10:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Wheatley governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 69.02 % 33.05 % 2.76 % 0.60 %
486000 3.85 % 4.09 % 0.37 % 0.05 %
594000 2.80 % 2.40 % 0.24 % 0.06 %
702000 2.08 % 1.95 % 0.15 % 0.00 %
810000 2.21 % 1.34 % 0.21 % 0.00 %
918000 1.66 % 1.04 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.06 % 0.84 % 0.03 % 0.00 %
1134000 0.77 % 0.54 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1242000 0.66 % 0.45 % 0.05 % 0.00 %
1350000 0.66 % 0.51 % 0.04 % 0.03 %
1458000 0.43 % 0.36 % 0.04 % 0.04 %
1512000 14.80 % 12.35 % 2.54 % 0.68 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 41.08 % 93.39 % 98.53 %
Aktiv 100.00% 58.92 % 6.61 % 1.47 %
GovernorTest NR11:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, IntelliDemand governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 33.87 % 10.93 % 1.11 % 0.03 %
486000 2.39 % 2.30 % 0.25 % 0.00 %
594000 2.71 % 2.07 % 0.17 % 0.00 %
702000 13.11 % 10.42 % 2.04 % 0.05 %
810000 3.21 % 1.86 % 0.35 % 0.00 %
918000 3.46 % 1.51 % 0.43 % 0.01 %
1026000 2.34 % 0.99 % 0.13 % 0.02 %
1134000 2.53 % 0.87 % 0.12 % 0.01 %
1242000 1.58 % 0.59 % 0.06 % 0.00 %
1350000 1.45 % 0.62 % 0.02 % 0.00 %
1458000 1.36 % 0.44 % 0.02 % 0.07 %
1512000 31.99 % 19.77 % 4.54 % 1.57 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 47.63 % 90.74 % 98.25 %
Aktiv 100.00% 52.37 % 9.26 % 1.75 %
GovernorTest NR12:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, OnDemand governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 59.12 % 26.42 % 1.72 % 0.39 %
486000 2.70 % 2.28 % 0.16 % 0.03 %
594000 2.16 % 2.49 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
702000 2.04 % 1.39 % 0.11 % 0.01 %
810000 2.13 % 1.37 % 0.05 % 0.02 %
918000 1.40 % 1.07 % 0.04 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.31 % 1.05 % 0.05 % 0.02 %
1134000 1.17 % 0.93 % 0.02 % 0.03 %
1242000 0.97 % 0.90 % 0.01 % 0.00 %
1350000 0.78 % 0.27 % 0.01 % 0.00 %
1458000 0.47 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 25.75 % 19.26 % 1.39 % 0.73 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 42.58 % 96.38 % 98.75 %
Aktiv 100.00% 57.42 % 3.62 % 1.25 %
GovernorTest NR13:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Badass governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 55.99 % 24.21 % 3.50 % 0.53 %
486000 2.77 % 2.24 % 0.22 % 0.01 %
594000 2.87 % 2.01 % 0.10 % 0.02 %
702000 2.36 % 1.64 % 0.07 % 0.07 %
810000 2.16 % 1.43 % 0.11 % 0.04 %
918000 1.93 % 1.14 % 0.09 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.88 % 1.15 % 0.11 % 0.00 %
1134000 1.74 % 0.93 % 0.04 % 0.01 %
1242000 1.23 % 0.80 % 0.06 % 0.01 %
1350000 1.44 % 1.03 % 0.09 % 0.02 %
1458000 1.40 % 1.04 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
1512000 24.24 % 15.49 % 2.19 % 0.52 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 46.89 % 93.36 % 98.74 %
Aktiv 100.00% 53.11 % 6.64 % 1.26 %
GovernorTest NR14:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Asswax governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 44.13 % 22.97 % 5.55 % 0.84 %
486000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
594000 21.13 % 18.18 % 4.00 % 0.84 %
702000 8.40 % 5.98 % 1.22 % 0.19 %
810000 6.73 % 3.67 % 0.95 % 0.14 %
918000 4.15 % 2.57 % 0.54 % 0.11 %
1026000 3.57 % 1.57 % 0.35 % 0.13 %
1134000 3.41 % 0.93 % 0.40 % 0.14 %
1242000 2.25 % 0.73 % 0.20 % 0.10 %
1350000 1.70 % 0.57 % 0.12 % 0.09 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 4.53 % 1.39 % 0.75 % 0.98 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 41.44 % 85.90 % 96.43 %
Aktiv 100.00% 58.56 % 14.10 % 3.57 %
GovernorTest NR15:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Adaptive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 57.99 % 30.45 % 6.32 % 0.62 %
486000 11.98 % 10.98 % 1.86 % 0.16 %
594000 8.48 % 7.38 % 0.94 % 0.13 %
702000 5.37 % 3.81 % 0.48 % 0.10 %
810000 3.84 % 2.32 % 0.37 % 0.05 %
918000 2.89 % 1.48 % 0.28 % 0.04 %
1026000 2.14 % 1.16 % 0.30 % 0.04 %
1134000 1.69 % 0.80 % 0.24 % 0.04 %
1242000 1.24 % 0.61 % 0.22 % 0.05 %
1350000 0.85 % 0.47 % 0.19 % 0.05 %
1458000 0.66 % 0.39 % 0.15 % 0.05 %
1512000 2.88 % 1.45 % 0.71 % 0.42 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 38.71 % 87.97 % 98.27 %
Aktiv 100.00% 61.29 % 12.03 % 1.73 %
GovernorTest NR16:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, AbyssPlug V2 governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 56.95 % 25.53 % 5.24 % 0.46 %
486000 2.67 % 2.39 % 0.55 % 0.01 %
594000 2.82 % 2.00 % 0.34 % 0.01 %
702000 2.18 % 1.41 % 0.23 % 0.00 %
810000 2.32 % 1.25 % 0.23 % 0.01 %
918000 2.09 % 0.98 % 0.23 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.74 % 0.98 % 0.17 % 0.02 %
1134000 1.79 % 1.03 % 0.08 % 0.00 %
1242000 1.21 % 0.67 % 0.12 % 0.00 %
1350000 1.47 % 1.09 % 0.10 % 0.02 %
1458000 1.12 % 0.91 % 0.11 % 0.01 %
1512000 23.64 % 15.38 % 3.28 % 0.52 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 46.39 % 89.31 % 98.92 %
Aktiv 100.00% 53.61 % 10.69 % 1.08 %
GovernorTest NR17:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, SmartMax governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 25.32 % 4.93 % 1.63 % 0.08 %
486000 8.89 % 4.90 % 1.60 % 0.16 %
594000 12.55 % 9.02 % 3.28 % 0.28 %
702000 24.71 % 18.18 % 7.03 % 0.58 %
810000 9.46 % 7.15 % 2.55 % 0.23 %
918000 6.36 % 3.76 % 1.42 % 0.12 %
1026000 4.10 % 2.24 % 0.82 % 0.10 %
1134000 4.01 % 0.92 % 0.49 % 0.05 %
1242000 2.09 % 0.51 % 0.32 % 0.06 %
1350000 1.53 % 0.34 % 0.33 % 0.05 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 0.98 % 0.60 % 0.38 % 0.09 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 47.45 % 80.14 % 98.18 %
Aktiv 100.00% 52.55 % 19.86 % 1.82 %
GovernorTest NR18:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Performance governor (no settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset ; I know this Test Seems crazy! but i was wondering about HotPlug in Performance!
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
486000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
594000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
702000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
810000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
918000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1026000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1134000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1242000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1350000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 100.00% 100.00% 0.00 % 0.00 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 0.00 % 100.00% 100.00%
Aktiv 100.00% 100.50 % 0.00 % 0.00 %

After all these Tests there is also a Comparision.
because i couldn't find a better diagram i've made the same again, this time in 3D.. looks little better iMHO
Governors like Wheatley, IntelliDemand, OnDemand, Badass and AbyssPlug v2 are currently configured to stay long on lowest frequency and also long on highest frequency
Governors like Asswax, Adaptive or SmartMax have a slow RampUP speed and therefore might cause Lag. At least for me when i switched from SmartMax to Performance there was a HUGE difference.
If you're okay with the Lag ( reccomended to try it out live for one day) Adaptive seems quite nice for Battery Life.
Doing a 1h battery test for each Governor seems to be possible the next days, so proof should be incoming soon.

Benchmark NR9:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 98% to 80% = 18%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/zTkZ0X6R
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 30.41 % 9.74 % 1.90 % 0.12 %
486000 3.44 % 2.95 % 0.48 % 0.03 %
594000 3.12 % 3.21 % 0.35 % 0.04 %
702000 2.95 % 2.38 % 0.22 % 0.03 %
810000 2.40 % 1.34 % 0.15 % 0.03 %
918000 1.72 % 0.75 % 0.08 % 0.01 %
1026000 22.72 % 23.48 % 3.16 % 0.16 %
1134000 5.43 % 1.55 % 0.22 % 0.03 %
1242000 8.69 % 3.58 % 0.57 % 0.08 %
1350000 7.11 % 3.66 % 0.41 % 0.07 %
1458000 4.12 % 2.48 % 0.50 % 0.05 %
1512000 7.88 % 3.88 % 0.76 % 0.13 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 41.01 % 91.21 % 99.22 %
Aktiv 100.00% 58.99 % 8.79 % 0.78 %
Benchmark NR10:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Wheatley governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 98% to 82% = 16%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/VPukG72u
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 73.13 % 37.12 % 7.29 % 0.18 %
486000 3.39 % 4.85 % 0.65 % 0.01 %
594000 2.30 % 2.83 % 0.39 % 0.01 %
702000 1.80 % 1.89 % 0.34 % 0.01 %
810000 1.70 % 1.59 % 0.24 % 0.01 %
918000 1.19 % 1.04 % 0.24 % 0.00 %
1026000 1.04 % 0.82 % 0.15 % 0.01 %
1134000 0.81 % 0.57 % 0.14 % 0.02 %
1242000 0.63 % 0.50 % 0.06 % 0.01 %
1350000 0.71 % 0.57 % 0.08 % 0.01 %
1458000 0.50 % 0.48 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
1512000 12.79 % 10.91 % 2.64 % 0.11 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 36.83 % 87.74 % 99.61 %
Aktiv 100.00% 63.17 % 12.26 % 0.39 %
Benchmark NR11:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, IntelliDemand governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 98% to 81% = 17%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/GBrEvpyh
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 34.55 % 13.16 % 1.96 % 0.06 %
486000 2.76 % 2.82 % 0.33 % 0.01 %
594000 2.78 % 2.99 % 0.35 % 0.00 %
702000 15.07 % 12.84 % 3.16 % 0.13 %
810000 2.90 % 2.33 % 0.27 % 0.01 %
918000 2.61 % 2.11 % 0.21 % 0.00 %
1026000 2.43 % 1.67 % 0.15 % 0.01 %
1134000 2.17 % 1.32 % 0.15 % 0.00 %
1242000 1.73 % 0.90 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1350000 1.46 % 0.77 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
1458000 1.24 % 0.59 % 0.09 % 0.00 %
1512000 30.28 % 23.07 % 4.07 % 0.38 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 35.43 % 89.09 % 99.39 %
Aktiv 100.00% 64.57 % 10.91 % 0.61 %
Benchmark NR12:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, OnDemand governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 97% to 80% = 17%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/Fi744sFG
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 63.13 % 28.77 % 5.79 % 0.10 %
486000 2.38 % 2.82 % 0.40 % 0.00 %
594000 2.29 % 2.68 % 0.34 % 0.00 %
702000 1.79 % 1.84 % 0.24 % 0.01 %
810000 1.78 % 1.71 % 0.21 % 0.01 %
918000 1.47 % 1.23 % 0.17 % 0.00 %
1026000 1.37 % 1.20 % 0.19 % 0.00 %
1134000 1.29 % 1.16 % 0.13 % 0.00 %
1242000 0.95 % 0.95 % 0.13 % 0.00 %
1350000 0.51 % 0.34 % 0.04 % 0.00 %
1458000 0.23 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 22.82 % 21.46 % 3.51 % 0.10 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 35.85 % 88.86 % 99.77 %
Aktiv 100.00% 64.15 % 11.14 % 0.23 %
Benchmark NR13:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Badass governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 98% to 80% = 18%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/36P8DhEB
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 54.38 % 23.96 % 4.48 % 0.14 %
486000 3.13 % 2.51 % 0.30 % 0.01 %
594000 2.92 % 2.10 % 0.28 % 0.01 %
702000 2.47 % 1.55 % 0.20 % 0.01 %
810000 2.53 % 1.37 % 0.17 % 0.01 %
918000 1.98 % 0.98 % 0.14 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.88 % 1.04 % 0.13 % 0.01 %
1134000 1.65 % 0.99 % 0.12 % 0.01 %
1242000 1.31 % 0.82 % 0.10 % 0.01 %
1350000 1.48 % 1.02 % 0.12 % 0.01 %
1458000 1.31 % 0.94 % 0.11 % 0.00 %
1512000 24.96 % 15.24 % 2.40 % 0.15 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 47.50 % 91.47 % 99.62 %
Aktiv 100.00% 52.50 % 8.53 % 0.38 %
Benchmark NR14:
Batterylife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Asswax governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 98% to 82% = 16%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/wvzQN8Gp
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 41.33 % 21.39 % 5.32 % 0.35 %
486000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
594000 21.15 % 17.51 % 3.90 % 0.21 %
702000 9.08 % 5.83 % 1.30 % 0.05 %
810000 6.78 % 3.64 % 0.71 % 0.04 %
918000 5.12 % 2.17 % 0.50 % 0.02 %
1026000 3.69 % 1.42 % 0.31 % 0.02 %
1134000 3.81 % 1.01 % 0.22 % 0.01 %
1242000 2.78 % 0.69 % 0.16 % 0.01 %
1350000 1.66 % 0.46 % 0.12 % 0.01 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 4.59 % 1.39 % 0.38 % 0.04 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 44.49 % 87.07 % 99.24 %
Aktiv 100.00% 55.51 % 12.93 % 0.76 %
Benchmark NR15:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Adaptive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 100% to 84% = 16%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/i4duaEgv
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 58.76 % 34.14 % 11.05 % 0.29 %
486000 12.47 % 11.53 % 2.95 % 0.08 %
594000 8.45 % 6.69 % 1.51 % 0.04 %
702000 5.39 % 3.23 % 0.76 % 0.03 %
810000 3.64 % 2.11 % 0.54 % 0.02 %
918000 2.62 % 1.46 % 0.34 % 0.02 %
1026000 2.05 % 1.05 % 0.25 % 0.02 %
1134000 1.63 % 0.79 % 0.19 % 0.01 %
1242000 1.23 % 0.58 % 0.15 % 0.02 %
1350000 0.81 % 0.42 % 0.11 % 0.01 %
1458000 0.58 % 0.35 % 0.08 % 0.02 %
1512000 2.35 % 1.33 % 0.44 % 0.08 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 36.33 % 81.62 % 99.36 %
Aktiv 100.00% 63.67 % 18.38 % 0.64 %
Benchmark NR16:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, AbyssPlug V2 governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 99% to 81% = 18%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/APY7VS3m
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 55.44 % 26.02 % 3.56 % 0.06 %
486000 3.04 % 2.63 % 0.21 % 0.00 %
594000 2.90 % 2.29 % 0.19 % 0.01 %
702000 2.48 % 1.67 % 0.13 % 0.00 %
810000 2.47 % 1.48 % 0.15 % 0.00 %
918000 2.02 % 1.09 % 0.11 % 0.00 %
1026000 1.80 % 1.08 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1134000 1.66 % 1.06 % 0.10 % 0.00 %
1242000 1.34 % 0.90 % 0.06 % 0.00 %
1350000 1.49 % 1.09 % 0.09 % 0.00 %
1458000 1.29 % 1.03 % 0.09 % 0.00 %
1512000 24.08 % 16.57 % 1.88 % 0.10 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 43.09 % 93.33 % 99.81 %
Aktiv 100.00% 56.91 % 6.67 % 0.19 %
Benchmark NR17:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, SmartMax governor (Settings + part2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
From 99% to 84% = 15%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/0Wm515ba
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 25.51 % 5.26 % 1.68 % 0.05 %
486000 8.62 % 5.54 % 1.73 % 0.08 %
594000 12.12 % 9.08 % 2.78 % 0.11 %
702000 24.30 % 17.76 % 5.19 % 0.23 %
810000 9.80 % 6.99 % 1.66 % 0.07 %
918000 6.32 % 3.48 % 0.80 % 0.03 %
1026000 4.76 % 2.05 % 0.45 % 0.02 %
1134000 4.76 % 1.15 % 0.26 % 0.02 %
1242000 2.01 % 0.51 % 0.10 % 0.02 %
1350000 1.03 % 0.26 % 0.06 % 0.01 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1512000 0.77 % 0.34 % 0.05 % 0.04 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 47.56 % 85.24 % 99.33 %
Aktiv 100.00% 52.44 % 14.76 % 0.67 %

One thing we've learned is that the previous assumption on batterylife according to clock speed wasn't that off.
Interessting fact: Race to idle DOES matter As the Wheatley governor uses way less battery than Interactive even tough it has longer 1525mhz times. (coming from this graphic)
Another thing is that the CPU load per core per clock is kinda similar to the 5 minute governor tests! This shows that even in 5 Minutes you can get accurate data on how your governor behaves. Altough this does not relate to battery life!
Here the comparison in one Graph
Even tough SmartMax beats all other in Battery life IMHO it does lag to much!
So the 3 Governors i'm gonna take a closer look are Wheatley, Asswax, Adaptive. Maybe also Interactive, because thats the standard governor.

I need to congratulate for this much enthusiasm. Thought I'm the only one caring much about battery life.
This gives us some interesting data!
______________________________________
My thread about optimizing battery life:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2382712

Benchmark NR18:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Wheatley governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Undervolted -112.5mV
From 98% to 81% = 17%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/GRTL98Kk
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 69.17 % 33.54 % 3.51 % 0.19 %
486000 3.17 % 3.58 % 0.30 % 0.02 %
594000 3.21 % 2.21 % 0.20 % 0.01 %
702000 3.33 % 1.46 % 0.13 % 0.01 %
810000 2.23 % 1.26 % 0.11 % 0.01 %
918000 1.41 % 0.84 % 0.11 % 0.01 %
1026000 1.07 % 0.64 % 0.11 % 0.00 %
1134000 0.88 % 0.54 % 0.07 % 0.01 %
1242000 0.73 % 0.44 % 0.06 % 0.00 %
1350000 0.68 % 0.43 % 0.06 % 0.00 %
1458000 0.56 % 0.36 % 0.03 % 0.01 %
1512000 13.55 % 10.40 % 1.67 % 0.11 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 44.30 % 93.64 % 99.61 %
Aktiv 100.00% 55.70 % 6.36 % 0.39 %
Benchmark NR19:
BatteryLife: Modified Stock Rom + XzKernel v19
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. showP MP-decision-control(settings Part1 & Part2)
60Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Undervolted -112.5mV
From 100% to 83% = 17%
BBS Log: http://pastebin.com/j7Zq7e3k
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 28.68 % 7.33 % 1.15 % 0.01 %
486000 3.06 % 2.49 % 0.22 % 0.00 %
594000 2.79 % 2.35 % 0.15 % 0.00 %
702000 2.84 % 1.47 % 0.08 % 0.00 %
810000 3.23 % 0.87 % 0.08 % 0.00 %
918000 2.27 % 0.48 % 0.03 % 0.00 %
1026000 19.17 % 16.71 % 1.65 % 0.01 %
1134000 6.65 % 1.00 % 0.07 % 0.00 %
1242000 9.79 % 2.66 % 0.24 % 0.00 %
1350000 7.81 % 2.36 % 0.17 % 0.02 %
1458000 4.46 % 2.38 % 0.30 % 0.02 %
1512000 9.26 % 3.41 % 0.33 % 0.05 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 56.47 % 95.53 % 99.88 %
Aktiv 100.00% 43.53 % 4.47 % 0.12 %
Conclusion:
Battery tests do NOT provide solid proof if only done for 1h! At least 5h are necessary to really see a difference.
Conclusion 2:
Undervolting does not seem to bring any benefits! This has to be testet in a 5h marathon to be justified.
I'm not really keen on doing 5h tests but because there are no 0.1 % that would be the only way to get accurate Data.
@ sea, thats exactly why i'm doing it. To get some Data out there on how much each governor really performs.
next comming up: GPU benchmarks
Edit: Or not -.- Unreal Citadel crashes after 5-6 continuous benchmarks.
Are there any other nonstop continuous Benchmarks ?

Sooo.... today after a long slumber i tried to make some Battery Benchmarks when listening to Music with the Speakers!
Set to Fligthmode deactivate WiFi and repeate 1 Track for 3 hours, with Screen off!
Sadly that failed!
It seems my speaker are broken! it happens sometimes that they dont play the sound the should but more like a crackling noise! force closing the current app resolves that problem.
As you can see here it stopped working after 2H!
here is a full BBS log.
===================
General Information
===================
BetterBatteryStats version: 1.15.0.0_RC4
Creation Date: 2014-03-08 17:06:24
Statistic Type: Custom to Current
Since 3 h 4 m 6 s
VERSION.RELEASE: 4.3
BRAND: Sony
DEVICE: C6603
MANUFACTURER: Sony
MODEL: C6603
OS.VERSION: 3.4.82-XzK-v23+
BOOTLOADER: s1
HARDWARE: qcom
FINGERPRINT: Sony/C6603/C6603:4.3/10.4.1.B.0.101/mr_3rQ:user/release-keys
ID: 10.4.1.B.0.101
TAGS: release-keys
USER: BuildUser
PRODUCT: C6603
RADIO: 9x15A-ACEFWMAZQ-30110089-54
Rooted: true
============
Battery Info
============
Level lost [%]: Bat.: -12% (99% to 87%) [3.9%/h]
Voltage lost [mV]: (4083-4035) [15.7%/h]
===========
Other Usage
===========
Deep Sleep (): 44 s (44 s) Ratio: 0.4%
Awake (): 3 h 3 m 22 s (11002 s) Ratio: 99.6%
Screen On (): 48 s (48 s) Ratio: 0.4%
No Data Connection (): 3 h 4 m 6 s (11046 s) Ratio: 100.0%
No or Unknown Signal (): 3 h 4 m 6 s (11046 s) Ratio: 100.0%
Screen dark (): 48 s (48 s) Ratio: 0.4%
=========
Wakelocks
=========
AlarmManager (com.android.systemui.System-UI): 1 h 9 m (4140 s) Count:6681 37.5%
AudioOut_2 (1013): 55 m 41 s (3341 s) Count:8 30.3%
SemcMusicPlayer (WALKMAN): 55 m 25 s (3325 s) Count:27 30.1%
AlarmManager (Android System): 2 m 3 s (123 s) Count:181 1.1%
SemcMusicPlayer-timed (WALKMAN): 57 s (57 s) Count:55 0.5%
AudioOut_3 (1013): 7 s (7 s) Count:5 0.1%
================
Kernel Wakelocks
================
"PowerManagerService.WakeLocks" (): 3 h 2 m 32 s (10952 s) Cntc/wc/ec)7/0/0 99.1%
"alarm" (): 1 m 30 s (90 s) Cntc/wc/ec)11212/0/0 0.8%
"power-supply" (): 14 s (14 s) Cntc/wc/ec)354/-1/0 3.2%
"msm_hsic_host" (): 2 s (2 s) Cntc/wc/ec)4/0/0 0.0%
"alarm_rtc" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)1/0/0 0.0%
"PowerManagerService.Broadcasts" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)4/0/0 0.0%
"PowerManagerService.Display" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)2/0/0 0.0%
"mmc1_detect" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)1/0/0 0.0%
"qcril" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)179/0/0 0.0%
"KeyEvents" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)618/0/0 0.0%
"event0-1075" (system, com.sonymobile.mx.android, com.sonyericsson.music): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)8/1/0 0.0%
"qmuxd_port_wl_18" (): (0 s) Cntc/wc/ec)726/0/0 0.0%
======================
Alarms (requires root)
======================
com.google.android.gms (): Wakeups: 9
Alarms: 7, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.GCM_RECONNECT
Alarms: 2, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
com.google.android.gsf (): Wakeups: 7
Alarms: 6, Intent: {com.google.android.gsf/com.google.android.gsf.checkin.EventLogService$Receiver}
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.intent.action.SEND_IDLE
com.android.exchange (): Wakeups: 6
Alarms: 5, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.EmailSyncAlarmReceiver}
Alarms: 1, Intent: {com.android.exchange/com.android.exchange.MailboxAlarmReceiver}
android (): Wakeups: 5
Alarms: 0, Intent: android.intent.action.TIME_TICK
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.server.action.NETWORK_STATS_POLL
Alarms: 3, Intent: android.app.backup.intent.RUN
Alarms: 1, Intent: android.content.syncmanager.SYNC_ALARM
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindowManager.DELAYED_KEYGUARD
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.android.server.IdleMaintenanceService.action.UPDATE_IDLE_MAINTENANCE_STATE
Alarms: 0, Intent: com.sonyericsson.intent.action.HYSTERESIS_TIMER
com.oasisfeng.greenify (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.oasisfeng.greenify.CLEAN_NOW cmp={com.oasisfeng.greenify/com.oasisfeng.greenify.CleanerService}
Alarms: 0, Intent: {com.oasisfeng.greenify/com.oasisfeng.greenify.CleanerService}
com.google.android.talk (): Wakeups: 1
Alarms: 1, Intent: com.google.android.apps.babel.CLEANUP_DB
======================
Network (requires root)
======================
==========
CPU States
==========
384 MHz (): 2 h 57 m 12 s 96.2%
486 MHz (): 14 s 0.1%
594 MHz (): 7 s 0.1%
702 MHz (): 1 s 0.0%
810 MHz (): 2 s 0.0%
918 MHz (): 2 s 0.0%
1.03 GHz (): 2 m 30 s 1.4%
1.13 GHz (): 1 s 0.0%
1.24 GHz (): 17 s 0.2%
1.35 GHz (): 18 s 0.2%
1.46 GHz (): 10 s 0.1%
1.51 GHz (): 2 m 22 s 1.3%
Deep Sleep (): 44 s 0.4%
==================
Reference overview
==================
ref_boot: Reference ref_boot created 55 s (Wl: 5 elements; KWl: 0elements; NetS: 10 elements; Alrm: 0 elements; Proc: 5 elements; Oth: 5 elements; CPU: 12 elements)
ref_unplugged: Reference ref_unplugged created 1 h 26 m (Wl: 0 elements; KWl: 19elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 7 elements; Proc: 0 elements; Oth: 8 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
ref_charged: Reference ref_charged created 1 h 26 m (Wl: 0 elements; KWl: 19elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 7 elements; Proc: 0 elements; Oth: 8 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
ref_custom: Reference ref_custom created 1 h 28 m 17 s (Wl: 9 elements; KWl: 19elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 8 elements; Proc: 6 elements; Oth: 8 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
ref_current: Reference ref_current created 4 h 32 m 24 s (Wl: 10 elements; KWl: 21elements; NetS: 25 elements; Alrm: 8 elements; Proc: 28 elements; Oth: 8 elements; CPU: 13 elements)
Funny to see, even tough it did not play music via speakers (see the battery drain) it still was active the whole 3h !
Edit:
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 96.66 % 0.09 % 0.04 % 0.04 %
486000 0.13 % 0.01 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
594000 0.07 % 0.01 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
702000 0.02 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
810000 0.02 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
918000 0.02 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1026000 1.36 % 0.03 % 0.02 % 0.02 %
1134000 0.01 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
1242000 0.15 % 0.02 % 0.01 % 0.01 %
1350000 0.16 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.00 %
1458000 0.09 % 0.01 % 0.02 % 0.00 %
1512000 1.29 % 0.03 % 0.03 % 0.02 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 99.78% 99.86% 99.90%
Aktiv 100.00% 0.22 % 0.14 % 0.10 %

What an unappreciated thread. It seems like the Xperia (Z) community are more into making their phone look like the most recent version of Sony's android, rather than getting the best battery and/or performance out of the phone.
Thanks for all your work on this Haldi and for the insight into the different governors. I've only recently taken a look at the adaptive governor, it seems very conversative. It's just that most of the other governors boost the freq to max (1,5) with the littlest amount of activity (like pulling down the notif drawer) which seems like a waste to me... Then rather some lag !
I've underclocked the cpu to 162mhz which I also undervolted to 700. Is there any battery gain out of this, you think, or will just mainly just be performance loss? As adaptive stay on 162mhz quite a lot.
Also, any thoughts on the settings "io_is_busy" and "ignore_nice_load"?

This thread is more for my own pleasure to gather all data in one Place
I did not yet go I to the depts of Governor configuration. I.e. Interactive you can change the complete behaviour of the governor. Way to much of a hassle.
And I start to get the feeling that governors are not THAT important for Battery life with LIGHT workload (aka web browsing, XDA app, sms, what's app. And stuff) still gotta do a Full battery life test from 100% to 0% with all time Screen On.
But I'd say that if you get ca. 6h (lowest brightness) with standard interactive you might get between 6:10 and 6:20 with the best batterysavy governor.
One one hand your right that every minute more is better, but is it worth the lags, stutter and Page buildup time?
Same goes for Undervolting. I doubt you'd get more than 5-15 Minutes out of it. Mainly because that only benefits in high frequency regions, which nearly never are active on light workload.
If I get a Z2 soon (maybe) I have lots of time to let my Z run such Benchmarks

Well I guess if you play games the difference in battery life will be bigger when you undervolt. Anyway, great work !

And here come some more Governor Benchmarks! Using the newest Doomkernel v22 with the Stock 101 4.3 Rom
GovernorTest NR31:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 14.68 % 0.43 % 0.14 % 0.08 %
486000 1.25 % 0.23 % 0.04 % 0.04 %
594000 0.99 % 0.17 % 0.07 % 0.04 %
702000 2.22 % 0.08 % 0.08 % 0.00 %
810000 2.08 % 0.15 % 0.01 % 0.03 %
918000 2.86 % 0.12 % 0.01 % 0.03 %
1026000 12.58 % 0.88 % 0.16 % 0.07 %
1134000 8.34 % 0.35 % 0.09 % 0.06 %
1242000 12.50 % 0.56 % 0.15 % 0.14 %
1350000 14.00 % 0.67 % 0.30 % 0.11 %
1458000 7.46 % 2.82 % 1.12 % 0.66 %
1512000 21.04 % 1.17 % 0.21 % 0.01 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 92.37 % 97.62 % 98.75 %
Aktiv 100.00% 7.63 % 2.38 % 1.25 %
GovernorTest NR32:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, IntelliActive governor (Settings + Settings 2 + Settings 3) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 23.12 % 0.32 % 1.71 % 2.22 %
486000 2.66 % 0.14 % 0.33 % 0.17 %
594000 2.57 % 0.23 % 0.13 % 0.20 %
702000 2.32 % 0.30 % 0.08 % 0.01 %
810000 2.83 % 0.25 % 1.70 % 1.87 %
918000 3.47 % 0.09 % 0.40 % 0.20 %
1026000 4.20 % 0.42 % 0.02 % 0.12 %
1134000 4.21 % 0.16 % 0.03 % 0.04 %
1242000 2.84 % 0.62 % 0.11 % 0.05 %
1350000 2.01 % 0.75 % 0.07 % 0.05 %
1458000 2.00 % 1.59 % 2.48 % 2.01 %
1512000 47.76 % 2.08 % 1.71 % 0.72 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 93.04 % 91.23 % 92.33 %
Aktiv 100.00% 6.96 % 8.77 % 7.67 %
GovernorTest NR33:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, IntelliDemand governor (Settings + Settings 2 + Settings 3) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 22.82 % 1.32 % 0.44 % 0.44 %
486000 1.02 % 0.32 % 0.06 % 0.04 %
594000 1.11 % 0.26 % 0.02 % 0.02 %
702000 3.71 % 3.36 % 1.82 % 2.00 %
810000 2.26 % 0.70 % 0.12 % 0.07 %
918000 3.15 % 0.47 % 0.21 % 0.06 %
1026000 4.13 % 0.40 % 0.19 % 0.13 %
1134000 4.58 % 0.44 % 0.15 % 0.11 %
1242000 4.11 % 0.35 % 0.06 % 0.06 %
1350000 3.55 % 0.34 % 0.07 % 0.07 %
1458000 3.11 % 4.32 % 2.37 % 1.33 %
1512000 46.45 % 3.96 % 1.16 % 0.49 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 83.76 % 93.32 % 95.18 %
Aktiv 100.00% 16.24 % 6.68 % 4.82 %
GovernorTest NR34:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, onDemand governor (Settings + Settings 2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 32.56 % 6.88 % 8.14 % 9.61 %
486000 2.49 % 0.86 % 0.38 % 0.19 %
594000 2.51 % 0.84 % 0.35 % 0.20 %
702000 2.33 % 0.72 % 0.30 % 0.19 %
810000 2.70 % 0.69 % 0.31 % 0.21 %
918000 2.04 % 0.60 % 0.23 % 0.26 %
1026000 1.93 % 0.50 % 0.20 % 0.09 %
1134000 1.69 % 0.53 % 0.17 % 0.12 %
1242000 1.43 % 0.37 % 0.11 % 0.12 %
1350000 1.12 % 0.11 % 0.06 % 0.02 %
1458000 0.84 % 4.05 % 2.95 % 2.60 %
1512000 48.35 % 7.90 % 2.80 % 1.12 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 75.94 % 84.00 % 85.25 %
Aktiv 100.00% 24.06 % 16.00 % 14.75 %
GovernorTest NR35:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, Wheatley governor (Settings + Settings 2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 33.73 % 5.21 % 4.59 % 5.14 %
486000 2.01 % 0.74 % 0.33 % 0.33 %
594000 2.15 % 0.58 % 0.30 % 0.28 %
702000 1.96 % 0.38 % 0.24 % 0.35 %
810000 2.19 % 0.46 % 0.22 % 0.42 %
918000 1.71 % 0.35 % 0.19 % 0.19 %
1026000 1.56 % 0.32 % 0.14 % 0.18 %
1134000 1.23 % 0.27 % 0.12 % 0.18 %
1242000 1.00 % 0.19 % 0.09 % 0.09 %
1350000 1.12 % 0.17 % 0.10 % 0.14 %
1458000 1.04 % 5.26 % 3.77 % 3.52 %
1512000 50.32 % 11.99 % 7.90 % 8.40 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 74.07 % 82.00 % 80.78 %
Aktiv 100.00% 25.93 % 18.00 % 19.22 %
GovernorTest NR36:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, LionHeart governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. Qualcomm MP-decision-control
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 6.11 % 1.81 % 5.11 % 5.80 %
486000 2.28 % 2.04 % 1.72 % 1.34 %
594000 4.07 % 2.67 % 1.63 % 1.17 %
702000 1.98 % 2.27 % 1.10 % 0.55 %
810000 3.76 % 2.19 % 0.92 % 0.37 %
918000 1.97 % 1.81 % 0.64 % 0.24 %
1026000 2.48 % 1.86 % 0.49 % 0.13 %
1134000 5.05 % 1.74 % 0.43 % 0.06 %
1242000 2.89 % 1.23 % 0.35 % 0.07 %
1350000 14.37 % 1.99 % 0.45 % 0.02 %
1458000 0.00 % 1.21 % 0.21 % 0.00 %
1512000 55.03 % 1.67 % 0.27 % 0.00 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 77.53 % 86.68 % 90.25 %
Aktiv 100.00% 22.47 % 13.32 % 9.75 %
Combined Governor Chart:

I guess you're right. I mean, today I've been using Smartmax and while there's something nice about it doing all the light things in low clocks, it does obviously often feel sluggish (especially feelable on the keyboard, imo). Im thinking of keeping the phone out of the charger/usb the entire day tomorrow and see how it ends up but for, like you say, what, 20 mins tops more battery - is it worth it?
I mean if I wanted a sluggish phone I might as well have stayed with my X8
Interactive does seem to spread out the work on other clocks than max, tho, unlike most of the other governors. The only thing that bothers me about most of the "not-so-much-battery-saving" governors is that they have a tendency to just ramp that clock up to the max, even when phone is just idling (with screen on). I can appreciate the boost for touch/input, tho.

Soo.... here some more Benchmarks, with IntelliPlug instead of MP-Decision from Qualcomm !
GovernorTest NR37:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 28.88 % 18.47 % 12.18 % 5.60 %
486000 2.83 % 2.78 % 1.15 % 0.70 %
594000 2.84 % 2.39 % 0.89 % 0.55 %
702000 3.17 % 1.90 % 0.74 % 0.34 %
810000 2.41 % 1.29 % 0.43 % 0.24 %
918000 2.18 % 0.68 % 0.42 % 0.18 %
1026000 20.32 % 17.70 % 8.90 % 3.85 %
1134000 6.93 % 1.72 % 0.52 % 0.11 %
1242000 9.29 % 3.53 % 0.69 % 0.37 %
1350000 8.12 % 3.41 % 1.31 % 0.66 %
1458000 4.18 % 3.09 % 1.26 % 0.50 %
1512000 8.84 % 5.14 % 2.20 % 0.86 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 37.90 % 69.31 % 86.05 %
Aktiv 100.00% 62.10 % 30.69 % 13.95 %
GovernorTest NR38:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, IntelliActive governor (Settings + Settings 2 + Settings 3) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 35.90 % 29.97 % 16.22 % 6.20 %
486000 5.23 % 4.59 % 2.58 % 1.03 %
594000 4.06 % 3.97 % 1.21 % 0.29 %
702000 3.78 % 2.05 % 0.71 % 0.19 %
810000 13.27 % 13.23 % 8.24 % 5.52 %
918000 3.64 % 2.16 % 0.93 % 0.63 %
1026000 3.19 % 0.90 % 0.63 % 0.14 %
1134000 2.14 % 0.45 % 0.15 % 0.04 %
1242000 1.24 % 0.26 % 0.14 % 0.06 %
1350000 0.88 % 0.13 % 0.08 % 0.05 %
1458000 0.51 % 0.71 % 0.55 % 0.24 %
1512000 26.18 % 14.64 % 6.66 % 3.23 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 26.94 % 61.89 % 82.37 %
Aktiv 100.00% 73.06 % 38.11 % 17.63 %
GovernorTest NR39:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, IntelliDemand governor (Settings + Settings 2 + Settings 3) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 35.70 % 24.71 % 12.68 % 5.15 %
486000 2.47 % 2.64 % 0.63 % 0.41 %
594000 2.29 % 2.47 % 0.75 % 0.29 %
702000 14.27 % 20.04 % 10.58 % 6.85 %
810000 3.35 % 2.54 % 1.09 % 0.56 %
918000 3.66 % 1.98 % 0.92 % 0.26 %
1026000 3.02 % 1.55 % 0.64 % 0.38 %
1134000 3.47 % 1.90 % 0.76 % 0.26 %
1242000 2.96 % 1.81 % 0.96 % 0.44 %
1350000 1.86 % 0.82 % 0.27 % 0.11 %
1458000 1.88 % 0.76 % 0.48 % 0.23 %
1512000 25.08 % 14.98 % 5.68 % 2.78 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 23.80 % 64.56 % 82.29 %
Aktiv 100.00% 76.20 % 35.44 % 17.71 %
GovernorTest NR40:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, onDemand governor (Settings + Settings 2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 72.15 % 56.13 % 30.14 % 15.01 %
486000 1.73 % 1.79 % 0.87 % 0.41 %
594000 1.56 % 1.66 % 0.73 % 0.33 %
702000 1.31 % 1.12 % 0.52 % 0.32 %
810000 1.27 % 1.28 % 0.52 % 0.24 %
918000 1.11 % 0.88 % 0.37 % 0.29 %
1026000 0.99 % 1.06 % 0.34 % 0.19 %
1134000 0.90 % 0.81 % 0.39 % 0.33 %
1242000 0.64 % 0.71 % 0.26 % 0.16 %
1350000 0.43 % 0.19 % 0.09 % 0.07 %
1458000 0.12 % 0.14 % 0.34 % 0.15 %
1512000 17.79 % 17.00 % 10.00 % 5.02 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 17.24 % 55.41 % 77.48 %
Aktiv 100.00% 82.76 % 44.59 % 22.52 %
GovernorTest NR41:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, Wheatley governor (Settings + Settings 2) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 74.22 % 57.86 % 35.06 % 18.17 %
486000 1.52 % 1.98 % 1.06 % 0.57 %
594000 1.55 % 1.67 % 0.90 % 0.44 %
702000 1.18 % 1.22 % 0.56 % 0.40 %
810000 1.23 % 1.15 % 0.54 % 0.33 %
918000 1.02 % 1.00 % 0.50 % 0.30 %
1026000 0.86 % 1.01 % 0.47 % 0.39 %
1134000 0.83 % 0.90 % 0.46 % 0.27 %
1242000 0.76 % 0.79 % 0.42 % 0.24 %
1350000 0.76 % 0.92 % 0.41 % 0.26 %
1458000 0.64 % 0.79 % 0.46 % 0.54 %
1512000 15.43 % 15.92 % 9.78 % 7.23 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 14.78 % 49.39 % 70.86 %
Aktiv 100.00% 85.22 % 50.61 % 29.14 %
GovernorTest NR42:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, LionHeart governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 21.83 % 28.13 % 18.40 % 7.18 %
486000 3.38 % 4.44 % 2.89 % 0.18 %
594000 6.16 % 6.86 % 4.19 % 0.13 %
702000 2.92 % 3.51 % 2.19 % 0.10 %
810000 6.76 % 5.98 % 3.43 % 0.14 %
918000 3.76 % 3.25 % 1.46 % 0.16 %
1026000 4.34 % 3.36 % 1.33 % 0.14 %
1134000 8.76 % 5.34 % 2.00 % 0.11 %
1242000 4.31 % 2.35 % 0.74 % 0.14 %
1350000 11.85 % 3.08 % 1.48 % 0.12 %
1458000 0.00 % 0.10 % 0.07 % 0.15 %
1512000 25.94 % 3.94 % 2.57 % 4.26 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 29.65 % 59.24 % 87.20 %
Aktiv 100.00% 70.35 % 40.76 % 12.80 %
And again, here the full chart with all Governors and IntelliPlug

And then i tried this "Eco Modus" 2 Cores only
GovernorTest NR43:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, Interactive governor (Settings) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 19.14 % 2.40 % 1.22 % 1.48 %
486000 1.71 % 0.88 % 0.33 % 0.10 %
594000 2.19 % 0.90 % 0.26 % 0.06 %
702000 2.93 % 0.73 % 0.28 % 0.05 %
810000 2.41 % 0.42 % 0.19 % 0.07 %
918000 2.31 % 0.25 % 0.06 % 0.05 %
1026000 14.97 % 4.87 % 1.55 % 0.07 %
1134000 7.73 % 0.78 % 0.10 % 0.08 %
1242000 11.91 % 1.19 % 0.35 % 0.05 %
1350000 12.20 % 1.45 % 0.41 % 0.05 %
1458000 5.54 % 3.16 % 1.00 % 0.32 %
1512000 16.97 % 1.55 % 0.55 % 4.13 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 81.41 % 93.71 % 93.47 %
Aktiv 100.00% 18.59 % 6.29 % 6.53 %
GovernorTest NR44:
Governor: Modified Stock Rom 101 +Doomkernel v22
Stock settings, IntelliActive governor (Settings + Settings 2 + Settings 3) , [email protected] ondemand,Trepn Profiler NOT running. IntelliPlug
5Minutes Test, "normal" preset
Code:
Freq CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
384000 25.51 % 3.05 % 1.09 % 1.39 %
486000 4.75 % 1.32 % 0.37 % 0.08 %
594000 3.41 % 1.34 % 0.22 % 0.10 %
702000 2.86 % 1.26 % 0.17 % 0.05 %
810000 3.65 % 0.85 % 0.33 % 0.10 %
918000 4.15 % 0.71 % 0.11 % 0.04 %
1026000 4.07 % 3.38 % 1.06 % 0.05 %
1134000 3.60 % 0.36 % 0.05 % 0.04 %
1242000 1.96 % 1.35 % 0.23 % 0.05 %
1350000 1.92 % 1.46 % 0.46 % 0.05 %
1458000 1.32 % 3.26 % 1.12 % 0.30 %
1512000 42.81 % 1.83 % 0.65 % 3.28 %
InAktiv 0.00 % 79.83 % 94.15 % 94.48 %
Aktiv 100.00% 20.17 % 5.85 % 5.52 %
And here the full comparison for Interactive and IntelliActive with Inteliplug, Intelliplug+Eco Mode, MP-decision

nexus 6p gets slow after a few days, logd memory seems high?

My Nexus 6P lately has been getting really slow after being on for a few days. I ran:
Code:
adb shell
top -m 20 -s rss
And I think it looks unusual that my 'logd' is spinning out of control like this:
Code:
User 6%, System 48%, IOW 10%, IRQ 1%
User 90 + Nice 28 + Sys 928 + Idle 641 + IOW 193 + IRQ 17 + SIRQ 17 = 1914
PID PR CPU% S #THR VSS RSS PCY UID Name
348 3 0% S 7 1263224K 947564K bg logd /system/bin/logd
4866 3 1% S 110 2439336K 131284K fg system system_server
16227 0 0% S 20 1698620K 124780K fg system com.android.settings
6114 2 0% S 47 1725224K 115604K fg u0_a27 com.android.systemui
19588 0 0% S 33 2253364K 89148K bg u0_a29 com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox
7176 0 0% S 238 1826080K 82560K fg u0_a280 com.fitbit.FitbitMobile
14869 1 0% S 100 1723796K 74144K fg u0_a12 com.google.android.gms.persistent
22388 0 1% S 53 1692288K 64760K bg u0_a175 com.facebook.orca
23633 0 2% S 66 1824088K 61444K bg u0_a79 com.facebook.katana
13291 1 0% S 59 1773460K 57124K fg u0_a12 com.google.android.gms
Code:
logcat -g
main: ring buffer is 256Kb (556Mb consumed), max entry is 5120b, max payload is 4076b
system: ring buffer is 256Kb (33Mb consumed), max entry is 5120b, max payload is 4076b
crash: ring buffer is 256Kb (36Kb consumed), max entry is 5120b, max payload is 4076b
Does anyone knows what this means and how I can stop it from happening? It is ruining an otherwise great phone.