Hello everyone,
My T-Mobile USA seems very slow. About 800kbit/sec
Is there a way to increase the MTU and RWIN Values?
Try Yours Too !!
TCP/IP Analyzer Suggested:
MTU = 1460
MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput.
MSS = 1420
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1420, which equals MSS.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 5840
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor: 2^2=4)
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 1460
RWIN seems to be set to a very small number. If you're on a broadband connection, consider using a larger value.
For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
65320 (up to 2 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46)
130640 (1-5 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2)
261280 (2-14 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^2)
522560 (8-30 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^3)
1045120 (25-60 Mbit lines depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^4)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
Your TCP Window limits you to: 234 kbps (29 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 93 kbps (12 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 162 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
Thank you,
Monnie
UPDATE:
On WiFi
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 04.10.2010 14:53
IP address: 68.16.xxx.xxx
Client OS: Windows XP
TCP options string: 020405ac0103030101010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 66792 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 1 bits (2^1=2)
Unscaled RWIN : 33396
Recommended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104, 1022208
BDP limit (200ms): 2672kbps (334KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1069kbps (134KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 108
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
EDIt
crap i read it as slow charging but yeah if anyone can help with that issue haha
my charging is soooo slow.
i got it friday.
i thought it was cause im not using the htc charger im using the usb cable it came with but another wall adaptor.
any help would be great
I barely hit 780kbps on H and GSM. Myold Tilt on AT&T on 3G was hitting 1500+...
I am also getting edge in an area marked as 3G.
~CYD
MonnieRock said:
Is there a way to increase the MTU and RWIN Values?
<snip>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1420 is a perfectly normal MTU value for GPRS-based internet, no need to muck about with that.
Your RWIN, however, is very low. For comparison, in my registry (HKLM/Comm/TCPIP/Parms), my TCP windows size is listed as 65536
However, when I run your analyzer, I have RWIN=66640, w/ TCP1323 (window scaling) enabled. So take a look at your settings.
lbhocky19 said:
my charging is soooo slow.
i got it friday.
i thought it was cause im not using the htc charger im using the usb cable it came with but another wall adaptor.
any help would be great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is because you aren't using the HTC charger. Most 'normal' chargers only deliver 500-700mA. Your computer will only deliver 500mA. The HTC charger delivers the full 1A.
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone run the test?
Thank you,
Monnie
MonnieRock said:
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone run the test?
Thank you,
Monnie
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am quite curious about this...
I'll probably dive into this once I'm home later this evening, it seems pretty interesting.
As for the charging speed (discussed above) -- in my apartment, all of my room electrical outputs have variations in voltage. Each is also conveniently labeled for optimal results. For instance, in my bedroom... its "converted" output is 5V = 1.5A per hour. It will charge my handset from 20% to 80% in less than an hour.
Code:
Tested on; 04.15.2010 08:26
IP address: 208:54.xx.xx
TCP options string:
0204058c0101040201030302
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 5840 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling; 2 bits (2^2=4)
Unscaled RWIN: 1460
Recommended RWINS: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560, 1045120
BDP limit (200ms): 234kbps (29KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 93kbps (12KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 164
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
CYDVicious said:
I barely hit 780kbps on H and GSM. Myold Tilt on AT&T on 3G was hitting 1500+...
I am also getting edge in an area marked as 3G.
~CYD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on the same boat. I haven't tested the connection yet, but the moment I put a foot in my home my 3G vanishes and it starts showing Edge, to which it only connects properly about 50% of the time (I get network connection errors anytime I want to update weather, stocks, check internet... you see the picture here). FYI, I am in the middle of a 3G area
mazzarin said:
Your RWIN, however, is very low. For comparison, in my registry (HKLM/Comm/TCPIP/Parms), my TCP windows size is listed as 65536
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Window Size is set to 131072, is that the way is supposed to be?
MonnieRock said:
Hello everyone,
My T-Mobile USA seems very slow. About 800kbit/sec
Is there a way to increase the MTU and RWIN Values?
Try Yours Too !!
TCP/IP Analyzer Suggested:
MTU = 1460
MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput.
MSS = 1420
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1420, which equals MSS.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 5840
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor: 2^2=4)
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 1460
RWIN seems to be set to a very small number. If you're on a broadband connection, consider using a larger value.
For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
65320 (up to 2 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46)
130640 (1-5 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2)
261280 (2-14 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^2)
522560 (8-30 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^3)
1045120 (25-60 Mbit lines depending on latency. MSS * 46 * 2^4)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
Your TCP Window limits you to: 234 kbps (29 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 93 kbps (12 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 162 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
Thank you,
Monnie
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same thing (same exact numbers)... this freakin' blows!
My Whole Point
egzthunder1 said:
My Window Size is set to 131072, is that the way is supposed to be?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RWIN is scalable. Notice how it changes for WiFi. The whole point of my thread and trying to gain data is, T-Mobile is not allowing the RWIN to scale when using their data/internet connection. No matter what your RWIN is set to in the registry.
Thank you,
Monnie
My connection is dreadfully slow even on 3G. I've had that same problem since I had my previous android phone, so it might be network related, but, on a good day, I'll hit 600kbps, most of the time I hover between 100 and 300 kbps.
Back when T-mo first opened up 3g on my area, there were not many of us in our city with G1s, so I'd hit 1800 kbps usually, but now it's gotten bad.
I guess I'll call t-mo. It feels as if my connections has been throttled all the way down (I am a pretty heavy data user, but my phone spends A LOT of time in slow connections).
Related
Ok, so it looks like I was bored, and so far I haven't seen anybody else try this so why not, right?
As the owner of a Sierra Wireless AirCard 860 (UMTS/HSDPA) and an HTC TyTN (UMTS/HSDPA), I figured I could be the first to compare different types of PC data connections.
Anecdotally, it seemed like the TyTN USB-tethered connection was roughly the same speed as the direct PC-Card connection, and the TyTN tethered over Bluetooth definitely seemed slower, but it was time to confirm.
For all tests, I used Cingular's ISP.CINGULAR APN, and I logged in as [email protected]. There was no proxy server used at all. Also, I disabled all apps on my PC that might try and hijack the data connection and disconnected WiFi and wired ethernet connections before getting started.
For my benchmark, I ran the 600k test from DSLReports.com
Finally, all tests were run within a 45-minute period at my home office desk in the Boston area (I had a good 3G connection for all tests).
So the results:
Siera Aircard 860
11:25pm 634 kbs
11:26pm 559 kbs
11:27pm 651 kbs
11:28pm 737 kbs
11:29pm 646 kbs
-----------------
Avg: 645 kbs
HTC TyTN (USB Tether)
11:41pm 585 kbs
11:42pm 737 kbs
11:43pm 748 kbs
11:44pm 648 kbs
11:45pm 520 kbs
-----------------
Avg: 648 kbs
HTC TyTN (Bluetooth 1.2 Tether)
12:06am 307 kbs
12:08am 296 kbs
12:09am 312 kbs
12:10am 275 kbs
12:11am 308 kbs
-----------------
Avg: 300 kbs
So what did I learn from all this? Statistically, there was no difference in speed between the PC-Card and the Tethered USB connections. Also, as expected, the Bluetooth connection was significantly slower.
Other conclusion: I really can't justify keeping the PC-Card 3G plan anymore! I'll be giving up simultaneous Internet-on-PC and phone connectivity, but at a $59.99/mo savings? I think it's worth it!
What about using a Bluetooth 2.0 adapter on the PC?
I didn't have a BT 2.0 card to test with, but I doubt it will make any difference -- the TyTN doesn't support EDR...
I should also note that I've seen significantly higher speeds than reported in the test, but this is pretty indicative of how the different configurations behave.
I've cancelled my data card plan effective 9/25. If somebody wants to lend me a card between now and then, I'm happy to try it...
I've noticed the following problem:
When trying to download (file copy/video play) from my LAN to the HD, download speeds maximum is about 340 kbps (LOL...that's like EDGE) . With the same setup (wireless "G" router) I can download on the HD from internet with speeds 2 000+ kbps. LAN operations between my PCs/laptops are @ 60 000 kbps wired and 20 000 kbps wireless (using the same setup). To access my LAN from the HD I'm using Resco Explorer....and at that 340 kbps speed it's not possible to watch movies from my LAN. No such problem with my other PDA (iPAQ HX4700) which is not even "G" but "B" device - speed is about 3 000 kbps. Can anyone confirm this and suggest a solution? Can anyone watch movies from LAN encoded with more than 400 kbps?
p.s.: Speeds are measured using DU Meter (for PC)
p.s. 2: Same low (340 kbps) speed with another wireless router
kokopipi said:
I've noticed the following problem:
When trying to download (file copy/video play) from my LAN to the HD, download speeds maximum is about 340 kbps (LOL...that's like EDGE) . With the same setup (wireless "G" router) I can download on the HD from internet with speeds 2 000+ kbps. LAN operations between my PCs/laptops are @ 60 000 kbps wired and 20 000 kbps wireless (using the same setup). To access my LAN from the HD I'm using Resco Explorer....and at that 340 kbps speed it's not possible to watch movies from my LAN. No such problem with my other PDA (iPAQ HX4700) which is not even "G" but "B" device - speed is about 3 000 kbps. Can anyone confirm this and suggest a solution? Can anyone watch movies from LAN encoded with more than 400 kbps?
p.s.: Speeds are measured using DU Meter (for PC)
p.s. 2: Same low (340 kbps) speed with another wireless router
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you are using the default memory card that came with the phone, it is only a class 2. the write speed isn't spectacular, this may not be the reason. but it's the only variable i see right now. since your can download stuff to your phone from web at good speeds. i think it's more of a problem with the machine that is "uploading" or hosting the video. check the upload speed of that machine.
I think the memory has nothing to do with the problem. And I've tried with different host machines - the same result.
Slow network speed through WIFI
I have to same problems on my HD. I am using a home server at home which holds all of my videos. When connecting to it and watching a video with my old Eten X800 everything works fine and runs smoothly. But doing the same on my HD results in an unwatchable video. If I copy and paste this video on my mem card on the HD the video runs smoothly. There are some strange things going on with the WIFI speeds on the HD
Anyone worth investigating this issue?
Yeah... the strange thing is LAN speed is much lower than Internet speed using same network equipment
do better help me to help you, can you give me the numbers again in the follow format (some of them were missing from your original post)
Internet->Host:
Host->Internet (may not be relevant, but give it anyway):
Internet->HD:
HD->Internet:
Host->HD:
HD->Host:
arrows indicating direction of the traffic (ie. downloading or upload).
buggybug0 said:
do better help me to help you, can you give me the numbers again in the follow format (some of them were missing from your original post)
Internet->Host:
Host->Internet (may not be relevant, but give it anyway):
Internet->HD:
HD->Internet:
Host->HD:
HD->Host:
arrows indicating direction of the traffic (ie. downloading or upload).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Internet->Host: 7825 kbps (currently)
Host->Internet (may not be relevant, but give it anyway): 506 kbps
Internet->HD: 1560 kbps (currently)
HD->Internet: can't measure
Host->HD: 340 kbps
HD->Host: 340kbps
Also
Host->another PC 60 000 kbps (wired)
another PC->Host 60 000 kbps (wired)
Host->Laptop 20 000 kbps (wireless)
Laptop->Host 20 000 kbps (wireless)
The Host could be PC/another PC/Laptop - the results concerning the HD are identical, which means the problem is not from the Host nor the network setup.
Did you check the power saving settings in the WiFi parameters ?
Coude said:
Did you check the power saving settings in the WiFi parameters ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YEAH!
it could be toggled/switched on "better performance" for better speed and "best performance" for g protocol. But the device will be hotter!
Coude said:
Did you check the power saving settings in the WiFi parameters ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These settings affect both Internet and LAN performances but Internet speed is OK and LAN speed is slow. And yes, I did play with the settings - results are the same. (because I'm 2-3 meters away from the wireless router). I'll be glad if someone with HD, actually tests a connection between his HD and a PC in a LAN and not just giving "blind" suggestions. What I want to know is if it's a problem with all HDs or just my device is faulty.
kokopipi said:
Internet->Host: 7825 kbps (currently)
Host->Internet (may not be relevant, but give it anyway): 506 kbps
Internet->HD: 1560 kbps (currently)
HD->Internet: can't measure
Host->HD: 340 kbps
HD->Host: 340kbps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the nerd in me just want to go to your house and troubleshoot this for you in person. LOL... anyway...
what is the file you used to test in each case? the reason i'm asking is that some files are more compressed than others, and the speed we see is the NOT the raw speed -- the capability of the wifi card. but the combined speed of the CPU processing power and the network speed.
long story short, if you are downloading, the data is broken up and transfered piece by piece -- a movie is broken up and transfered bit by bit. depending on the file, the receiver side needs to process these bits and recombine them back together. it's much easyer to recombine a webpage, text file or equivalent. but mp3s, rar/zip or movies are already compressed/encoded with special algorithm, so the receiver processor needs to chew through these data to recombine them, so it won't accept faster than it can "chew".
of course this may not be the reason for your problem at all, but try transferring a large text file (copy and paste text from a website to notepad and c+p over and over, till you have a ~ 10MB txt file).
Even on copy files (not trying to play them, hence no decompression) just copy from PC to HD, no matter what the file type is, the speed is that - 340 kbps. Why don't you just try it yourself?
Take a look at his article: http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=6440
tnyynt said:
Take a look at his article: http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=6440
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it really improve speed? I find WIFI a bit slower with the yweak installed.
kokopipi said:
Even on copy files (not trying to play them, hence no decompression) just copy from PC to HD, no matter what the file type is, the speed is that - 340 kbps. Why don't you just try it yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With my HD the same slow speeds. Tried several different hardware. Only HD is slow as hell. WIFI speed tweak does'nt do much, btw.
Some speed results:
WIFI Setting Best Battery / Resco Explorer 7.05: 45 KB/s
WIFI Setting Best Performance / Resco Explorer 7.05: 300 KB/s
WIFI Setting Best Performance / Total Commander/CE v2.51: 600 KB/s
So Resco does not work well with local shares. won't be using that anymore when c/p'ing. Altough speeds are doubling with TC it still is'nt fast imho.
Noone else tried this and encountered the same problem?
Ever find a fix for this?
I noticed the exact same problem last night when trying to play some TV shows over Wi-Fi from my PC. The file played OK for a couple seconds, then stalled
Using "Network Plugin for File Explorer" from HTC, I get an ave. speed of ±340kbps. The speed is the same whether I save to memery MC or phone memory. So the write speed of the MC has no bearing on the problem.
PS. Just tried on my work network with the same results...
Lucky you guys... I at best performance get ~120kb transfer and at optimal I get ~80kb transfer (copy) with Resco on wrt54gl with ddwrt on it
I've had an issue tethering my WinMo 6.5 Energy ROM on an HTC Fuze with Linux. The connection itself was fine but browsing was flaky. Some sites worked while others did not.
I finally tracked it down to an MTU problem. You basically need to reduce your MTU size to get it to work (the lower the MTU size, the more packet overhead and hence lower effective throughput). The default MTU size was 1478, reducing it to 1200 solved the issues I was having. If your phone is connected as eth1, the command to change it is:
ifconfig eth1 mtu 1200
pmugabi said:
I've had an issue tethering my WinMo 6.5 Energy ROM on an HTC Fuze with Linux. The connection itself was fine but browsing was flaky. Some sites worked while others did not.
I finally tracked it down to an MTU problem. You basically need to reduce your MTU size to get it to work (the lower the MTU size, the more packet overhead and hence lower effective throughput). The default MTU size was 1478, reducing it to 1200 solved the issues I was having. If your phone is connected as eth1, the command to change it is:
ifconfig eth1 mtu 1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank it works
taker2
glad it help !!
Good idea, thanks!
It save my ass.. Thanks dude you ROCK!
better solution
http://kaffeine.cf/2016/02/05/forcing-mtu-for-clients-of-androidap/
I've downloaded apps that claim to be able to change the WiFi transmit power, but they all required the iwconfig command to be available on the phone. Is there any way to change the WiFi transmit power on my Nexus 4?
I would like to lower the transmit power to the absolute minimum so I can have the WiFi hotspot on more often without it draining battery so much.
up
WCNSS_qcom_cfg.ini in system/etc/wifi,
maximum tx power
gtxpowercap=30
tried editing the config file?, i dont know if it will work, maybe have powercap=10
I find a way to verify if it works:
Turn on virtual router in windows, use Microsoft Network Monitor to capture wifi traffic, after it have connected, click an Association Request frame in a capture of Network Monitor, in the Frame Details window, expand nodes and note the value next to the node labeled MaximumTransmitPowerCapability:
Frame: Number = 9, Captured Frame Length = 193, MediaType = WiFi
- WiFi: [ ManagementAssociation request] ....... RSSI = -26 dBm, Rate = 6.0 Mbps, SSID = Router14
+ MetaData: RSSI = -26 dBm, Rate = 6.0 Mbps
...
- AssociationRequest:
+ Capability: 0x3105
ListenInterval: 1 BeaconInterval(s)
- InformationElements:
...
- PowerCapability:
ElementID: Power Capability
Length: 2 (0x2)
MinimumTransmitPowerCapability: 13 dBm
MaximumTransmitPowerCapability: 17 dBm
...
hi
any one know how to speed up mobile usb tether
speed on computer never get a test past 1mb up
http://www.speedtest.net/result/6499841208.png
on phone i get 7 up 3 down
has the dash cable someting to do with it
I’ve got the same problem. I verified it’s the device by putting the sim in a z5 compact. Upload is fine it’s just download that stalls over usb tether. I have also tried 4 different usb cables
It seems like a problem with the device or software itself.
Finally I have found someone with the same problem. Well kind of. I find the usb tether works fine on windows. However the download is slow on all flavors of linux I have tested. That is Opensuse, Fedora, Mint, and Ubuntu. I'm using a dual boot notebook, so the windows 7 pro operation is on the same hardware.
The problem is framing errors. About a third of the packets need to be sent again. On linux, run ifconfig. Your USB tether should be usb0. You will see errors on the RX line.
usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr (censored)
inet addr:192.168.42.33 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: 2607:fb90:84fa:32bc:801c:7bff:feea:e2d7/128 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::801c:7bff:feea:e2d7/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2327 errors:438 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:438
TX packets:2159 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2817625 (2.6 Mb) TX bytes:327971 (320.2 Kb)
Wifi tether is fine.
Yikes, I'm having the same (on Fedora, if this matters). Wifi hotspot is fast, USB, not so much.
I'm getting 90Mbps on 4G+ on the phone itself
Getting 30Mbps on wifi tethering
Getting 110Kbps on USB tethering...
enp0s20u1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.42.190 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.42.255
RX packets 439 bytes 169395 (165.4 KiB)
RX errors 70 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 70
TX packets 587 bytes 145175 (141.7 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
asc366 said:
Yikes, I'm having the same (on Fedora, if this matters). Wifi hotspot is fast, USB, not so much.
I'm getting 90Mbps on 4G+ on the phone itself
Getting 30Mbps on wifi tethering
Getting 110Kbps on USB tethering...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. It has been like pulling teeth to get anyone to try to duplicate this problem. I mean really, is a linux user tethering a OP5 on USB that much of a unicorn????
I will now reopen my ticket with OnePlus that the problem has been reproduced.
Thanks again.
I got the same issue with mint with USB
Without drivers Windows doesn't Work fine too
It wouldn't hurt to open a ticket with OnePlus. Let them know it isn't an isolated incident. Include the ifconfig output.
gariac said:
I will now reopen my ticket with OnePlus that the problem has been reproduced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any news on this?
they told me do a factory :silly: reset
havent tried it yet
I have -- did a reset on Saturday. Will test soon and report back to you.
Been through all the available options:
* Unrooted stock Oxygen OS
* Rooted FreedomOS
* Rooted OxygenOS
* Custom ROMS like Resurrection Remix
Always doing a completely clean flash, wiping all partitions and restoring user data with TitaniumBackup.
USB tethering is completely b0rken, period.
This is both with Fedora 26 and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, can't say about Windows, don't have any version of it up to date.
It's highly annoying since this is my fallback for my sometimes flaky 4G home ISP. WiFi tethering is fine, but especially for high quality streams and ssh/sshfs connections to my own server I'd like to have bandwidth very low latency. Maybe it's a modem firmware problem?
run ifconfig
any thing similar in windows
ipconfg dose not give much
I want to buy one of these OnePlus 5 bad boys but I do not see anyone doing a 6.01 Marshmallow and near as I been able to tell 7 Nuggets screwed over all tethering in all forms.
I used it on my samsung s7 and beyond tethering 7.1.1 was very glitchy messy Experience for me that left a very bad taste in my mouth.
My plan allows tethering and I never got higher than 10 kb with 7.1.1.. Reflashed and it fixed it for hot spot but the usb stopped completely ...
7.1.1 a mess and its not the Device Model but 7 Nugget based Roms...
So any word on a Custom Based 6.01 Rom ?
All I got from OnePlus was acknowledgement that my ticket was open again. Also they wanted to know that I was running the latest OS. Nothing beyond that.
I tried again after factory reset and it's still the same, max 200Kbps
```
[[email protected] ~]$ ifconfig enp0s20u1
enp0s20u1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.42.190 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.42.255
ether MASKED txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 1582 bytes 1234142 (1.1 MiB)
RX errors 558 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 556
TX packets 1724 bytes 362977 (354.4 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
```
---------- Post added at 11:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:23 PM ----------
I've created a bugreport on their forum. Please star and reply with additional information if you share my experience.
https://forums.oneplus.net/threads/usb-tethering-is-very-slow-tethering-over-wifi-is-fast.630646/
Hi all,
Got feedback from OnePlus, they've instructed me to downgrade to 4.5.8. Is there anyone running 4.5.8 by any chance?
Also, I've tested Windows as well and it's fast. It's only slow on Linux.
had same problem in 4.5.8
any one get this fixed ??
Not yet. I'll poke the guys at the ticket again
Vielen Dank für das Teilen der ausgezeichneten Informationen Great Job halten die gute Arbeit