Related
guys/gals,
have a question for those running custom kernels. would you mind sharing your kernel versions, setcpu settings, and benchmarks? some of us are interested to see the data. maybe the first person posting response could format their info so as people reply, they post their data in a similar structure so it is quick/easy to read/follow/compare.
thanks to anyone who responds.
You may get better battery life by letting the kernel dictate the speed the device runs at. The main function of setCPU should be to overclock the high end, not the low end.
This is just my opinion after not using setCPU, but it is a good assumption because the kernel already has these options built in.
Hey guys,
I wanted to get everyone's feedback and experiences between the 3 kernels. I realize that every device behaves differently, but was curious about which ones people have tried, if they found any cool things about specific ones they really liked Or if you wanted to share your experience about the latest build.
Thanks!
Trinity and franco are about the same, but trinity>franco.
KTmanta is in a totally different league, it offers total customization and imo is the best kernel just because of that.
Franco and Trinity are all about performance where ktmanta is about battery optimizations and customizations.
I haven't used Franco or trinity in a while, I know they score higher in benchmarks if that means anything at all.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
I think everyone knows my preference, but they are all good kernels. Unfortunately this tablet is not on Franco's priority list and does not see much development. I dont believe it has a 4.3 compatible version yet and the last release has a serious bug that causes SoD for most people.
I like Trinity and KManta for different reasons (those stated above). If I need to squeeze out battery life, I go with KManta and tweak the settings accordingly. But for my day-to-day use, I like Trinity for its smoothness. Just my two cents
Awesome input guys! Real useful information.
How would you guys describe KTManta when just using the stock values? When you guys say "customization", do you guys mean the voltage settings and stuff like that? I've been flashing for years, but have never really understood how that worked. Which is funny, because I am an experienced PC overclocker. People say the concept is very similar. If KTManta's customization options were removed, would it be then comparable to Trinity? Or would it still be better without all the options?
Would you guys say Trinity still has decent battery life? Compared to KTManta at stock values?
Which one does Chrome work the best with?
Thanks!
Stock for stock Trinity is better because Morfic hardcodes overclock and undervolt values into the kernel and sets up all that stuff as his stock settings for the kernel. KTManta allows you to do those things and WAY more, but does not set them up as stock values because Ktoonsez prefers to keep the default settings for his kernel closer to the default settings of the stock AOSP kernel. So while Trinity may have -50mv undervolt to everything and a GPU overclock of 620MHz (I think that is the speed?), KTManta allows you to go +/- 200 mv to any frequency step for CPU or GPU that you feel like and also allows OC to 2.1GHz on CPU and 720MHz on the GPU if you want to, as well as RAM OC if you want to, and control of the scaling of every part of the chipset, again if you *want* to. But it doesnt set any custom stuff as default since everyone's device is unique and people want to do different things with it. That is why we have pre-made settings available from various users so that you can load custom values to try out without having to go through a bunch of experimentation yourself.
Has anyone used this application on this phone? I was thinking about undervolting and maybe even under clocking.
In my experience if you are the kinda person that wants to overclock/underclock you are usually the same type of person that would flash a different rom. Now days most ROMs have great CPU options
Sharpbarb said:
Has anyone used this application on this phone? I was thinking about undervolting and maybe even under clocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trickstermod is the app I used most. I personally liked out better than setcpu
I don't know if the answer to my question is somewhere hidden between the thousands of threats but I did try to find it before(including Google and YouTube) and would be more than happy to get a reply.
I'm using custom Kernels since the Note 2 but was never able to put more time and afford in to understand how they actually work and always used the default settings.
Now I'm trying to get some knowledge on Kernel settings and what is safe to change and what not. I'm very interested on how a Kernel works and how I can boost both battery life and/or performance as well as the basic knowledge of the Kernel settings.
At the moment I'm trying to explore with trickster mod to kinda learn by doing but I always get really bad results in testing or no big changes when I change the governor. Also I'm a little afraid in messing up my phone and therefor don't change the settings much. What I know is that the same Kernel can have different outcomes on different Note 3's so please do not post just your Kernel and settings without explanation cause I would like to find the most suited Kernel and settings for my Note.
Sooo...Some help and explanations would be more than appreciated.
4aces said:
I don't know if the answer to my question is somewhere hidden between the thousands of threats but I did try to find it before(including Google and YouTube) and would be more than happy to get a reply.
I'm using custom Kernels since the Note 2 but was never able to put more time and afford in to understand how they actually work and always used the default settings.
Now I'm trying to get some knowledge on Kernel settings and what is safe to change and what not. I'm very interested on how a Kernel works and how I can boost both battery life and/or performance as well as the basic knowledge of the Kernel settings.
At the moment I'm trying to explore with trickster mod to kinda learn by doing but I always get really bad results in testing or no big changes when I change the governor. Also I'm a little afraid in messing up my phone and therefor don't change the settings much. What I know is that the same Kernel can have different outcomes on different Note 3's so please do not post just your Kernel and settings without explanation cause I would like to find the most suited Kernel and settings for my Note.
Sooo...Some help and explanations would be more than appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can give you a brief (easy) explanation with comparisons to try to get you to understand what a kernel is.
A kernel is your phone's driver (like a car) where it adjusts settings of the hardware and controls how each individual part interacts with each other.
There is a reason you take a car to get tuned up, and that is because a car can go berserk as there is no "maintaining force" - YOU or the person who tunes your car makes changes to the car to make sure it does not overheat, use less power per mile travelled, control how much windshield fluid is being released or how much torque force required to ensure the car does not snap XXXXXX when going at a speed of YYYYYY.
These options are beyond the manufacturer's decisions, and therefore when people flash a kernel you immediately trip KNOX (N9005). You can give your phone less power to process, more power to process (not recommended), speed up the CPU/limit the CPU, control governors on how the disk I/O (input/output) is being handled and/or control how much the phone will swap to it's virtual memory when it reaches no memory.
People think use a custom kernel! It saves you a ton of battery life!. This statement is partially wrong. You have to understand how a kernel reacts to your phone. Even though I know that lite kernels like Wootever's Custom N3 has the best battery life, this is because it has less tweaks and features that may boggle the user, and may allow for subsequent battery life extension compared to CivZ's SneakyKat or Imoseyon's LeanKernel. By inserting new tweaks into the kernel, you allow to have more "useful" features that may add to the "driver's knowledge" - Color tweaking, Fast charge over USB, CIFS support, all are extras that the kernel supports. To save power, developers remove the junk that the manufacturers added and added their own settings to make sure they get the result they would like, then they would share it to the public. However, people recommend custom kernels as they get more options when they flash it, as well as ridding of a lot of the stock settings that manufacturers love setting (default governors, lowest CPU frequency, etc)
CPU governors work by controlling how much speed is used at a given time, a good description of what each governor does is listed here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1736168
I/O governors (simply speaking) control how files and requests are being handled by the system, a good description of what each governors is listed here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23616564&postcount=4. Good way to understand this is if you learnt programming and you learnt the Stack/Queue ADTs in a programming language, it describes things better when looking at the descriptions in the link above.
Adjusting Synapse/Trickster would not get you anywhere to getting the best battery/best performance out of the phone. You will have to experiment and check which kernel is best with your phone, according to your SOC_PVS value. SOC_PVS value is how Qualcomm decides your processor's manufacturing "rank" and if you compare a low rank to a high rank, you will see that you can use less power to operate a high ranked chip compared to a low ranked counterpart. As most governors rely heavily on how the code is handled by the system, you should always go for the kernel that fits your system, and setting configurations depending on your system's likings. By following other people's configurations you risk sporadic reboots and incompatibilities, as not all phones are built the same way.
Things you should not touch if you are afraid of destroying your phone: Overvolting and Overclocking, as these may fry your device if you don't know what you are doing.
Any questions - click reply to this, or else I won't see it!
nicholaschum said:
I can give you a brief (easy) explanation with comparisons to try to get you to understand what a kernel is.
A kernel is your phone's driver (like a car) where it adjusts settings of the hardware and controls how each individual part interacts with each other.
There is a reason you take a car to get tuned up, and that is because a car can go berserk as there is no "maintaining force" - YOU or the person who tunes your car makes changes to the car to make sure it does not overheat, use less power per mile travelled, control how much windshield fluid is being released or how much torque force required to ensure the car does not snap XXXXXX when going at a speed of YYYYYY.
These options are beyond the manufacturer's decisions, and therefore when people flash a kernel you immediately trip KNOX (N9005). You can give your phone less power to process, more power to process (not recommended), speed up the CPU/limit the CPU, control governors on how the disk I/O (input/output) is being handled and/or control how much the phone will swap to it's virtual memory when it reaches no memory.
People think use a custom kernel! It saves you a ton of battery life!. This statement is partially wrong. You have to understand how a kernel reacts to your phone. Even though I know that lite kernels like Wootever's Custom N3 has the best battery life, this is because it has less tweaks and features that may boggle the user, and may allow for subsequent battery life extension compared to CivZ's SneakyKat or Imoseyon's LeanKernel. By inserting new tweaks into the kernel, you allow to have more "useful" features that may add to the "driver's knowledge" - Color tweaking, Fast charge over USB, CIFS support, all are extras that the kernel supports. To save power, developers remove the junk that the manufacturers added and added their own settings to make sure they get the result they would like, then they would share it to the public. However, people recommend custom kernels as they get more options when they flash it, as well as ridding of a lot of the stock settings that manufacturers love setting (default governors, lowest CPU frequency, etc)
CPU governors work by controlling how much speed is used at a given time, a good description of what each governor does is listed here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1736168
I/O governors (simply speaking) control how files and requests are being handled by the system, a good description of what each governors is listed here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23616564&postcount=4. Good way to understand this is if you learnt programming and you learnt the Stack/Queue ADTs in a programming language, it describes things better when looking at the descriptions in the link above.
Adjusting Synapse/Trickster would not get you anywhere to getting the best battery/best performance out of the phone. You will have to experiment and check which kernel is best with your phone, according to your SOC_PVS value. SOC_PVS value is how Qualcomm decides your processor's manufacturing "rank" and if you compare a low rank to a high rank, you will see that you can use less power to operate a high ranked chip compared to a low ranked counterpart. As most governors rely heavily on how the code is handled by the system, you should always go for the kernel that fits your system, and setting configurations depending on your system's likings. By following other people's configurations you risk sporadic reboots and incompatibilities, as not all phones are built the same way.
Things you should not touch if you are afraid of destroying your phone: Overvolting and Overclocking, as these may fry your device if you don't know what you are doing.
Any questions - click reply to this, or else I won't see it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all thank u very much for the detailed response. That was exactly what I was looking for. I will get back to you after going through the awesome links you were posting with some more knowledge
One thing which came straight in my mind was how do I know if I have a low or high rank from the soc_pvs_value and where do I find it?
Thanks again!
4aces said:
First of all thank u very much for the detailed response. That was exactly what I was looking for. I will get back to you after going through the awesome links you were posting with some more knowledge
One thing which came straight in my mind was how do I know if I have a low or high rank from the soc_pvs_value and where do I find it?
Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anytime
You can either install Synapse (If your Kernel supports it, and click on the button under CPU), or check here:
Code:
/sys/devices/system/soc/soc0/soc_pvs
The higher your number, the better.
nicholaschum said:
Anytime
You can either install Synapse (If your Kernel supports it, and click on the button under CPU), or check here:
Code:
/sys/devices/system/soc/soc0/soc_pvs
The higher your number, the better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran out of "thanks" so u get it tomorrow. But thanks again. One more thing:
How do I know if I have a high number/between which numbers does the value wary? My soc_pvs is 3.
4aces said:
I ran out of "thanks" so u get it tomorrow. But thanks again. One more thing:
How do I know if I have a high number/between which numbers does the value wary? My soc_pvs is 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got a rather good number.
The lowest is 0, and the highest is 6. I have 2 but I don't undervolt so this is not an issue
nicholaschum said:
You got a rather good number.
The lowest is 0, and the highest is 6. I have 2 but I don't undervolt so this is not an issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't thank u enough!!! Now I will be off to some reading and testing
nicholaschum said:
You got a rather good number.
The lowest is 0, and the highest is 6. I have 2 but I don't undervolt so this is not an issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aaand one more question.
What is the difference in tcp congestion control (cubic/reno) and what does it change?
4aces said:
Aaand one more question.
What is the difference in tcp congestion control (cubic/reno) and what does it change?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That seems more of a Trickster Mod specific tweak.
It is more of a network speed tweak which you can read here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_congestion_avoidance_algorithm
In simple words, you have to understand what Network Congestion is, and how queues affect how much data is being transmitted. When too much data is being carried in a link or a node, the quality of service would deteriorate. To do Congestion control, it affects how much data is being transmitted through each node systematically. This is rather complicated to explain using simple terms as this is a mathematical formula which processes how much data is being transmitted.
Cubic is used by many default linux kernels. Like CPU governors, these are data transmission governors, and it is best if you use the one better for your TCP/IP connection (Carrier or Wifi)
nicholaschum said:
That seems more of a Trickster Mod specific tweak.
It is more of a network speed tweak which you can read here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_congestion_avoidance_algorithm
In simple words, you have to understand what Network Congestion is, and how queues affect how much data is being transmitted. When too much data is being carried in a link or a node, the quality of service would deteriorate. To do Congestion control, it affects how much data is being transmitted through each node systematically. This is rather complicated to explain using simple terms as this is a mathematical formula which processes how much data is being transmitted.
Cubic is used by many default linux kernels. Like CPU governors, these are data transmission governors, and it is best if you use the one better for your TCP/IP connection (Carrier or Wifi)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just read the answer in the link u posted. Stupid me.
Sorry for taking up your time.
nicholaschum said:
That seems more of a Trickster Mod specific tweak.
It is more of a network speed tweak which you can read here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_congestion_avoidance_algorithm
In simple words, you have to understand what Network Congestion is, and how queues affect how much data is being transmitted. When too much data is being carried in a link or a node, the quality of service would deteriorate. To do Congestion control, it affects how much data is being transmitted through each node systematically. This is rather complicated to explain using simple terms as this is a mathematical formula which processes how much data is being transmitted.
Cubic is used by many default linux kernels. Like CPU governors, these are data transmission governors, and it is best if you use the one better for your TCP/IP connection (Carrier or Wifi)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have another question. If I want to oc or uv is there any script I have to use or can I just apply/test right away?
4aces said:
I have another question. If I want to oc or uv is there any script I have to use or can I just apply/test right away?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just use the main interface of either Trickster or Synapse. I use Synapse personally as my kernel provides the best interface on Synapse.
nicholaschum said:
Just use the main interface of either Trickster or Synapse. I use Synapse personally as my kernel provides the best interface on Synapse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What I found out so far is that the device runs smoother on performance based governors with cfq or sio scheduler. The best results I had so far was on lean kernel and ael kernel. I'm using the last at the moment cause it has a lot of settings to play with
But it seems that I'm still miles away from finding the best settings.
4aces said:
What I found out so far is that my device reacts not good on performance based governors & schedulers. The best results I had so far was on lean kernel and ael kernel. I'm using the last at the moment cause it has a lot of settings to play with
But it seems that I'm still miles away from finding the best settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give you some recommendations that would work well decently with 2-3 PVS valued processors.
Interactive Governor
No OC, No UV.
I/O schedulers Internal: cfq 512kb
I/O schedulers External: cfq 512kb
Dynamic Fsync Enabled
PowerSuspend driver enabled
Mdnie enabled, 0.39%
FastCharge Enabled
GPU Governor: Simple Ondemand 450MHz
I use CivZ's SneakyKat but Wootever's Custom N3 has the best battery life. If you want features you should play with CivZ's, if you like 6h screen on then you should play with Wootever.
You don't have to follow these values, but I spent days restarting my phone finding the best "average" configuration for devices ranging in my state. I found that Intellidemand didn't do so well and Interactive prevented any sporadic reboots that I got while on Intellidemand. Also read aheads of above 512kb doesn't show much speed enhancements. Synapse is great as it tells you whether your boot is successful or not, and now all my boots get Completed.
Notice: Do not soft reboot when configuring Kernels, Kernels don't get loaded properly/doesn't get reset properly so use Full reboot when configuring
cpu lock
I tried gaming with different kernels and governors and encountered a strange issue. Especially in candy crush after playing for a while the cpu locks (sometimes on 14k sometimes 12k). Reboot fixes it but I'm still curious why it locks.
@nicholaschum any idea?
Btw. my favorite settings so far are intellidemand with deadline gr8 performance and battery life is OK.
4aces said:
I tried gaming with different kernels and governors and encountered a strange issue. Especially in candy crush after playing for a while the cpu locks (sometimes on 14k sometimes 12k). Reboot fixes it but I'm still curious why it locks.
@nicholaschum any idea?
Btw. my favorite settings so far are intellidemand with deadline gr8 performance and battery life is OK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a bit weird, did you have powersaving turned on? But I assume it's off.
I think you should disable your kernel mod application in Application Manager and test it out, if it's a problem with Synapse/Trickster then one setting is a bit problematic.
nicholaschum said:
That's a bit weird, did you have powersaving turned on? But I assume it's off.
I think you should disable your kernel mod application in Application Manager and test it out, if it's a problem with Synapse/Trickster then one setting is a bit problematic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope that's why it's strange. Even got it after clean flash without setting/installing any Kernel related apps.
Tested other games and they work fine so I deleted candy crush and so far no cpu lock. No idea why, that's why I was curious
4aces said:
Nope that's why it's strange. Even got it after clean flash without setting/installing any Kernel related apps.
Tested other games and they work fine so I deleted candy crush and so far no cpu lock. No idea why, that's why I was curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't play Candy Crush so I wouldn't know..haha
nicholaschum said:
I don't play Candy Crush so I wouldn't know..haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Me neither from now on... (my kids will be sad though) Still can't really belive the game caused it
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Dn_nS said:
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the snapdrag version can be underclocked but there is no OC as the kernel is not modifiable Due to locked BootLoader
TheMadScientist said:
Well the snapdrag version can be underclocked but there is no OC as the kernel is not modifiable Due to locked BootLoader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I didn't specify things. I do mean the exynos version. There are some kernels that lift the 2,3 max freq to 2,65 GHz, but know that some S7 kernels climb to 2,9 GHz. So (in my book) that means the S8 should be able to overclock to 3 GHz (cause of the base A73 base of the 2nd gen mongoose cores and 10nm footprint).
So I'm just curious if it's not possible or there is some other reason why none are doing this.
And with underclocking I meant adding freqs that are below the standard lowest freq, my bad. (Don't how to call it otherwise)
Battery life.....
Battery life mainly.
Through overclocking, sure you can make s8 run as fast as oneplus considering s8's heavy skin, but most of us would rather see 6-8 hours of SOT with 24 hours of usage than our app opening 1-2 seconds faster.
Saying that, there are plenty of debloated roms for s8 that can run faster/smoother than the stock without sacrificing the battery life.
So, as for your question, maybe the devs don't want to put too much effort on overclocking an already pretty fast processor or underclocking an already pretty efficient processor. I am not a dev so can't really talk about complicated codings and stuff.
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This! Says it all.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
The S8 is fast enough on its own. I never even OC'd my S6. I find Exynos processors to be really fast as-is.
It's true, I dont't see any practical use for overclocking, yet. It would be purely for the fun of it. I'm sure we will see it more in the future, when some more hardware-heavy Games will be released.
Undervolting on the other surprises me aswell, to not see it frequently. Because, although it's totally fine right now, batterylife and efficiency can always be better.
I'm curious if we will see more Devs include this in their ROMs and Kernels
I agree with all the above. I called either due to snapdragon but I wouldn't even i if I could. I actually limit the clock speed on my big CPUs because the higher clock rates eat more power.
Also, why? Just why? Looking at cpu usage on my s8, the only time I've seen it actually pegged was running benchmarks. Overclocking is absolutely useless if the variable cpu clock never goes to 100% for more than milliseconds. Why do something so potentially dangerous for nothing?
:good::good::good:Well put guys:good::good::good:
I cant overclock but i still have set cpu and use it to underclock (when the screen is off) but most kf the time it is underclocked if it is not playing a game or ram extensive app
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you overclock GTX 2080? Why you overclock i9 or amd threadripper 2950x cpu? Why you overclock DDR4 3000MHZ Ram? Why you use 3DMark? Or cinebench or, or or........
Thats all the same.
To everyone asking "Why??", I find it rather odd that you don't know already...
The reason why some of us like (want) to overclock, or undervolt, is the exact same reason we're all on this site: We like to TWEAK STUFF!
Doesn't matter if it's rooting, flashing a custom ROM, creating a unique theme, coding a new app. All of those boil down to the same human instinct to explore, to make things better, or make new things. Whether or not it's needed is completely irrelevant
Using your logic, there's no reason to have a custom kernel in the first place, nevermind rooting your phone, or having custom ROM. The phone worked fine the way it was, after all, right?
In closing, the motto "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" is what the lay people adhere to. We who are more inclined in certain aspects of life (such as the XDA community) live by another: "If it ain't broke, tweak it!", or if you rather "If it ain't broke, tweak it till it does, then fix it!"
Please add over/underclocking and over/under volting for CPU and GPU cores to every kernel, for every device that allows it! We already except blame if anything bad should come to our device the moment we decide to root and/or flash something, so why not give us every single capability available for the devices and leave it up to us to do what we so choose? :good:
[Naturally, this is based on the assumption that a device lacks a bootloader, and the kernel maker possesses the knowledge; thus, this is referring to those situations where both apply.]
IDan1109 said:
Why would you overclock a Ferrari?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be faster than other team who is performance tuning as well. You don't have to do it because not everyone is doing. It should be geared towards to people who really care. Like others in this thread mention battery life but people like me wants it faster.
Also I game with the phone connected to charger all the time. I don't really game on the go though if I did I would bring portable battery if someone driving me. That just me.
People like me use phones for emulation. GameCube games are almost at the right speed but do run just a bit to slow in some location rendering them unpleasant to play. A bit more of cpu power would certainly make " Wind waker " run at constant 30 FPS. I hope this topic to be revived
Well just a quick answer , it's because of how samsung's voltage table is set , the voltage table is locked and to be modifed it needs to be hacked in some sort , that's why you cant oc that much since you need to change the voltage table and increase it so you can have stable oc
Addition:
There is alot of kernels that has oc already gpu and cpu wise , they add like 200mhz oc or something for cpu and 100 for the gpu yeah that would give you that little bit of extra juice but it aint stable in some sort you can have kernel crashes or system hogging that's due to the voltage table , i can make you a kernel that has 600mhz oc but ass soon as you select it , the phone would crash since it doesnt have enough power going to it
As Xperia modder said, darn LOCKED voltage table. If only it was unlocked....
---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:28 PM ----------
xperia modder said:
Well just a quick answer , it's because of how samsung's voltage table is set , the voltage table is locked and to be modifed it needs to be hacked in some sort , that's why you cant oc that much since you need to change the voltage table and increase it so you can have stable oc
Addition:
There is alot of kernels that has oc already gpu and cpu wise , they add like 200mhz oc or something for cpu and 100 for the gpu yeah that would give you that little bit of extra juice but it aint stable in some sort you can have kernel crashes or system hogging that's due to the voltage table , i can make you a kernel that has 600mhz oc but ass soon as you select it , the phone would crash since it doesnt have enough power going to it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I ask you a question? Just to have a doubt removed from my head. Do you know if Exynos 8890 devices have locked voltage table as well?
TechNoobForSale said:
As Xperia modder said, darn LOCKED voltage table. If only it was unlocked....
---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:28 PM ----------
Can I ask you a question? Just to have a doubt removed from my head. Do you know if Exynos 8890 devices have locked voltage table as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well tbh i dont know but this has always been. A thing with exynos chips , yeah some developers go out of their way and write some stuff from scratch to make it work you know
Dn_nS said:
Hi there,
I'm really loving xda for years cause the active community here (depending on the device) and love to overclock my phone.
Through the years I've oc'ed it all starting with my HTC legend.
I know that it isn't just adding some freqs and voltages to make this happen, but I don't understand why (kernel)makers don't oc the S8. For example, I see som kernel developers build kernels with oc/uc and voltage control for the S7 (exynos). Some of those developers now build kernels for the S8, but don't add any oc possibility.
I just don't get why and am really curious if any of you understand why?
It's not that I'm not grateful for what they do (cause they are awesome) but I'm just REALLY curious and can't find the reason why it shouldn't and/or couldn't be done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah has been realesed a2n kernel oc up to 2,8 ghz and oc up to 839mhz all of them is all core