Hi ppl,
What is the best size for poolsize ?
What will be if i set it to small value ? to big ?
IS it reasonable to change default PoolSize ?
Thanks
p-kirill said:
Hi ppl,
What is the best size for poolsize ?
What will be if i set it to small value ? to big ?
IS it reasonable to change default PoolSize ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would also like to know this, thanks.
everyone has their own opinion but I think the hd2 shouldn't go anywhere near the pool, never mind how big it is.. It might get wet
ok personally I find the pagepool set at 22mb to work best for me...
I set mine to 16, but i might be way off I think its a matter of taste and depends on the ROM.
Can we use the PagePoolChanger.exe that I used on my Diamond roms for the HD2? if it does work it looks like the standard roms are 15meg. Ill probably set mine to around 22meg, the phones got loads of ram and a bigger pool should help things out
is a larger pagepool better for the hd2?
sorry for my ignorance
what is the best and fastest way to set pagepool?
thx...!!!
Can someone post me the link to pool tools ?
I need info about default pool sizes
thanks
barbapappa_86 said:
I think its a matter of taste and depends on the ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My rom is clead version without manilla, htc messages and htc contacts
Pure windows like
So i have 240 ram and 290 rom and only 6M PP ( this is Envirus kitchen default) so i should know what is OEM default PP value.
I havent got and PP tool yet
Any ideas ?
Thanks
p-kirill said:
Can someone post me the link to pool tools ?
I need info about default pool sizes
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
type pagepool into the search at the top of the site and start reading..
the answers are all their for you..
fards said:
everyone has their own opinion but I think the hd2 shouldn't go anywhere near the pool, never mind how big it is.. It might get wet
ok personally I find the pagepool set at 22mb to work best for me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL..........
is a larger pagepool better?
Lizzo said:
is a larger pagepool better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depending on the apps you use and so forth. Pagepooling is the ability to change the amount of virtual memory the OS uses to run programs. So for instance, larger more intense apps like tomtom require more memory to run so with a larger set pp, tomtom will open faster.
A general rule of thumb is that larger is better however, there are limits to this as if you go too far, it will work in reverse.
Testing the limits using benchmarks is the most objective way to discern performance improvements and/or limitations. If there are significant improvements between tests, then the nake eyes should be sufficient to conclude.
The HD2 does have some nice memory overhead so it should be fun to see what this baby can do....
band27 said:
Depending on the apps you use and so forth. Pagepooling is the ability to change the amount of virtual memory the OS uses to run programs. So for instance, larger more intense apps like tomtom require more memory to run so with a larger set pp, tomtom will open faster.
A general rule of thumb is that larger is better however, there are limits to this as if you go too far, it will work in reverse.
Testing the limits using benchmarks is the most objective way to discern performance improvements and/or limitations. If there are significant improvements between tests, then the nake eyes should be sufficient to conclude.
The HD2 does have some nice memory overhead so it should be fun to see what this baby can do....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank u soo much for ur reply, it was quite helpful...so would it be wise to set a 24mb pp on a rom for the hd2? (i'm using pandora 1.1 btw)
and here's a pagepool changer for those who want it btw
I'm going to use 18
Lizzo said:
thank u soo much for ur reply, it was quite helpful...so would it be wise to set a 24mb pp on a rom for the hd2? (i'm using pandora 1.1 btw)
and here's a pagepool changer for those who want it btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can anyone confirm that this pagepool changer works?
Back in the day with the diamonds, you needed a Hex Editor to switch stuff around...Have a quick read <<HERE>>
bobsbbq said:
I'm going to use 18
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chefs know best...
band27 said:
Can anyone confirm that this pagepool changer works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does work....or i wouldnt have posted it
Xannytech's HD Rom uses 20mb.
The HD2 which has almost double the resources should be able to hit 24mb easy.
Lizzo said:
it does work....or i wouldnt have posted it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thus have you check to see if this happens:
• the higher the PP the lower your Program Memory goes, yes?
If it doesn't change as you change your PP, then it doesn't work.
I believe you however some people think it's working and sometimes it actually doesn't. Do the above test to see if it works...
MORE INFO on PP <<HERE>>
I set my to 0 (auto) and
It has been running very well and very fast.
Will see ...
Related
Update: pcarvalho has released a WM6.5 ROM that has all the files built in! Read more > http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=506043
Update: I've attached a .ZIP file with all that you need to test.
This package is released AS IS, only for testers. It has many bugs and some programs just won't start (like iGO8). It needs to be polished as the drivers are unfinished.
___________________________________
Boys and girls, I have good news for us, Polaris users. GfxBoost is working under Windows Mobile 6.5.
And finally, what we all were looking for: there are improvements!! Even with game emulators! You can watch the video I recorded here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYEWu9zLg6A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MKPL5V-p-g
At the moment, all that I can say is THANK YOU to the ones that made it possible !! The next days there will be information about it. Hold on!
The next challenge:
As many of you know, Polaris has a software problem with the touch screen that makes the CPU usage goes wild everytime you tap it. This produces lots of problems when scrolling and when making touch gestures. The video can be perfect in terms of speed, but I we have a too busy CPU, it produces a bottleneck that ruins all the stuff.
@rogro82 made his way trying to modify the touch.dll (presumably, it's responsible of the touchscreen). But I think it is a work in progress that was never finished.
For this reason, I really would like that a smart mind would put some light into this issue. It's the last barrier to a fully unleashed device.
Great! I am testing GfxBoost in the Polaris but I can not even see concrete improvements so far. Waiting for news
I've recorded a video
Here is a video I've recorded: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MKPL5V-p-g
It cannot really show how smooth it is, but believe me, it's pure silk.
I've applied the patch that rogro82 released (Touched.cab) to soften the touchscreen response and it's even better
As soon as I receive the appropiate commands, I will tell you more info. The MSM72XX Team is working into it.
fards is the one that gave me the files to activate the 3D acceleration.
Chainfire released GfxBoost.
pcarvalho cooked WM 6.5 eXtreme.
I don't want to hurt to forget anyone, and I'm only testing. All the merits are to be given.
hubie said:
Great! I am testing GfxBoost in the Polaris but I can not even see concrete improvements so far. Waiting for news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi GfxBoosts makes use of the 3D capabilities of MSM72XX (although it improves 2D). You have to be able to run 3D benchmarks like lights.exe. Unders Windows Mobile 6.5 I wasn't able to run it before. But thanks to fards, this changed. And now GfxBoost works like a charm.
awesome! good luck guyz, i hope u'll do it
SuperJMN said:
Here is a video I've recorded: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MKPL5V-p-g
It cannot really show how smooth it is, but believe me, it's pure silk.
I've applied the patch that rogro82 released (Touched.cab) to soften the touchscreen response and it's even better
As soon as I receive the appropiate commands, I will tell you more info. The MSM72XX Team is working into it.
fards is the one that gave me the files to activate the 3D acceleration.
Chainfire released GfxBoost.
pcarvalho cooked WM 6.5 eXtreme.
I don't want to hurt to forget anyone, and I'm only testing. All the merits are to be given.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post the files for 3d acceleration? because without them we can't run (and see improvments) GFxboost with pcarvalho rom.
That is really good news. Already last ROM from pcarvalho I found extremely fast and responsive. I don't know if he cooked in gfxboost.
whitealien said:
That is really good news. Already last ROM from pcarvalho I found extremely fast and responsive. I don't know if he cooked in gfxboost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i did not...now imagine with it cooked in
Nice one JMN.. now how about sharing these files for all the rest of us to experience?
Great work guys, now all you need to do is cook them in and it`ll be amazing ... its so nice to see that work is back on track for the polaris ... i was just considering to change it for a Pre ... though i think i`ll delay the change, just to see what else you have behind the corner.
A big THANK YOU to everybody who is doing everything possible to keep the Polaris alive.
great news!
possible to make tf3d working with this driver?
bally3 said:
Nice one JMN.. now how about sharing these files for all the rest of us to experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a look at the first post
bnm7bnm said:
great news!
possible to make tf3d working with this driver?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it won't change anything since the base driver is the same HTC-CA-Polaris-Driver.cab. Until there's no better driver, we will have suspend bug.
Hi..
If we test this software and something goes wrong, with a hard reset reverse everything to normal ???
calator40 said:
If we test this software and something goes wrong, with a hard reset reverse everything to normal ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course!!
OOOHHHH Man!!!!!!!!what is this!!!!!! IT WORKS!!!!!
Everything is much much smoother. Yes you did it guys.We have 3d drivers ,2d acceleration in pcarvalho rom 6.5.Yeeeeesssss!!
Many thanks to all of you
WOW! this is indeed great NEW!
my thank to everyone working on this.
my inicial analisys...
well you toke the files that where replaced and placed them in again...thats why it works...but thats also why it crashes...nk was patched to use less memory (to get 101mb of ram)...so when it needs more and cant get it...what you get is a system crash...
why did you (or fards) use 3.13 and not the 3.19 ddi and disptools?
Edit: just found out why 3.13 instead of 3.19...will not boot even
pcarvalho said:
my inicial analisys...
well you toke the files that where replaced and placed them in again...thats why it works...but thats also why it crashes...nk was patched to use less memory (to get 101mb of ram)...so when it needs more and cant get it...what you get is a system crash...
why did you (or fards) use 3.13 and not the 3.19 ddi and disptools?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i noticed that ...Destinator 7 in demo mode running in the background and when i open the opera the system crash.( Just like game over)
pcarvalho said:
my inicial analisys...
well you toke the files that where replaced and placed them in again...thats why it works...but thats also why it crashes...nk was patched to use less memory (to get 101mb of ram)...so when it needs more and cant get it...what you get is a system crash...
why did you (or fards) use 3.13 and not the 3.19 ddi and disptools?
Edit: just found out why 3.13 instead of 3.19...will not boot even
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you mean by that? Does it work or does it crash?
I found this Aldiko program and previously it worked perfectly. I am not sure what resolution I was running at, I think it was 320 x 428 though. It fit perfectly on the screen.
Now that I am running 240 x 320 , title pages are fine, but as I flip through, the pages are skewed off of the screen to the left so you cannot read the leftmost words, and to the right, you can see the first word on the following page. It makes it impossible to read anything
Does anyone have ideas about how to fix this besides going back to a 320x428 screen size? I haven't had success tweaking the columns in the program's own settings.
I greatly appreciate any help on this!!!
The same is happening to me. I think it's due to the resolution you have.
The application assumes a width when it's another. The offset is wrong and it's added up on every page, so it never gets the correct focus.
Did you change your lcd.density to 110? You need 110 for 240x320 to fit correctly.
Pandemic187 said:
Did you change your lcd.density to 110? You need 110 for 240x320 to fit correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure about this - I am using DZO 240x320 flashed to NAND - whatever the default is that is what I have.
Is there any way to check / change this with NAND? I know how to do it on the MicroSD card using default.txt but am new to NAND.
Greatly appreciate the help!
hey
you need to have ur res at 320x480 for alot of apps. they make there builds with diff res because the screen looks a bit more clear at the lower qvga res. But then u miss out on alot of apps which i think kills the purpose of an android phone... u will have to flash it with ur own data.img that u make with haret (after u run haret it makes a data.img but make sure ur default.txt has its res 320x480 and the lcd density to 160). Then u follow the directions here and use the 320x480.nbh then after u flash u have to adb into your phone to /system/build.prop and change the lcd density to 160.
i cannot get mine to adb so i cant fix my density and alot of the apps i use need to be at 320x480 so i am just going to buy a hero tonight. hopefully u have better luck with it then me.
lgevo said:
you need to have ur res at 320x480 for alot of apps. they make there builds with diff res because the screen looks a bit more clear at the lower qvga res. But then u miss out on alot of apps which i think kills the purpose of an android phone... u will have to flash it with ur own data.img that u make with haret (after u run haret it makes a data.img but make sure ur default.txt has its res 320x480 and the lcd density to 160). Then u follow the directions here and use the 320x480.nbh then after u flash u have to adb into your phone to /system/build.prop and change the lcd density to 160.
i cannot get mine to adb so i cant fix my density and alot of the apps i use need to be at 320x480 so i am just going to buy a hero tonight. hopefully u have better luck with it then me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha enjoy the hero, wish I could have one. I'm trying to see how long I can hold out, hanging on to my Vogue and $30 SERO.
That really stinks if 320x480 is required, I really can't survive in that resolution. Sure you can tweak the density but it never really works well for me, the text is too small in Maps and that is probably the most vital function for my phone.
really i think 320x480 looks great with maps (including the words) lol.. slowly more apps are getting qvga resolutions apparently. I hope i like the hero i heard the battery life is worse then the vogue with android lol.
I have version of Aldiko which works seamlessly on 240 x 320, I will try to post later tonight, it is freeware.
sshark said:
I have version of Aldiko which works seamlessly on 240 x 320, I will try to post later tonight, it is freeware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be great. i remember it worked good a while ago then after a couple updates it looked like the pages were a bit off.
lgevo said:
really i think 320x480 looks great with maps (including the words) lol.. slowly more apps are getting qvga resolutions apparently. I hope i like the hero i heard the battery life is worse then the vogue with android lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I couldn't deal with the words - the map looked nice but the words I could not read well enough for while I'm driving
that's crazy that Vogue has better battery life than Hero... guess they got shafted.
sshark said:
I have version of Aldiko which works seamlessly on 240 x 320, I will try to post later tonight, it is freeware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be fantastic
Here it is:
sshark said:
Here it is:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Works great
Excellent. I had the same problem and you app works perfectly. What was the issue? I am curious.
Thanks for the effort. I am so glad this is working.
thankyou sshark but do you know how to install your version of aldiko on my sony erricson x10 mini pro any help appreciated
Just for fun I created a pagepool size of 100 Mb. First, to test if it would really result in some significant speed gain and second to find out how and where the additional memory was taken from.
I never noticed this, but appearantly the size of the pagepool is taken from the program memory. Now, i'm asking myself, can't the pagepool size be taken as a measurement for how real the newly gained 576 ram is? For example, maybe someone can create a page pool size of 448 Mb (the size of the ram according to the specifications), just to see if the device is still starting up and if there is some significant memory left. (unfortunately I can't do this at the moment).
I know the size of the ram was tested before. Nevertheless, for some sceptics, and there are still some sceptics out there, this might be some convincing additional proof.
Second. I read some threads about page pool sizes and read that for old devices one of the biggest constraints was the available program memory. For the HD2 this isn't a issue anymore, so, from this new perspective I like to ask the cooks here: what would be a good page pool size for the HD2. What are the other constraints here which really matter.
(I now that this is a difficult thing to make statements about. Nevertheless, please give it a shot. Cause i'm new to cooking I like to learn something from it)
nice
i played alot with pp=0
nothing interesting
now i use default HTC value (15)
tell us about what you will get
p-kirill said:
nice
i played alot with pp=0
nothing interesting
now i use default HTC value (15)
tell us about what you will get
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my experience is that while cooking with new manila from 2.10 ROM if you go above 15MB, Document Browser Tabs thumbnails are not being loaded.there are only icons of formats documentas are in.
polystirenman said:
my experience is that while cooking with new manila from 2.10 ROM if you go above 15MB, Document Browser Tabs thumbnails are not being loaded.there are only icons of formats documentas are in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have 24mb pp on my 2.10 build and no problem in document tab for me. have you added the ereader tab? i left it out because it does seem to screw with manilla a bit.
however, im open to testing a 448mb pagepool will contrust one tomorrow and let y'all know
polystirenman said:
my experience is that while cooking with new manila from 2.10 ROM if you go above 15MB, Document Browser Tabs thumbnails are not being loaded.there are only icons of formats documentas are in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any problems with this and I run 18 usually, But I have tried 64 mb and still everything works. I just don't think after a certain amount of pagepool increase you don't see any more benefit
bobsbbq said:
I don't have any problems with this and I run 18 usually, But I have tried 64 mb and still everything works. I just don't think after a certain amount of pagepool increase you don't see any more benefit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still running 100 Mb. No problems whatsoever, but performance isn't any better (or worse) than a 16 Mb pagepool I tried before.
Anyone tried a 448 Mb pagepool yet, just to see if the new 576 ram is for real?
appelflap said:
I'm still running 100 Mb. No problems whatsoever, but performance isn't any better (or worse) than a 16 Mb pagepool I tried before.
Anyone tried a 448 Mb pagepool yet, just to see if the new 576 ram is for real?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i did!
it was very sloooooooow to boot and even slooooooooower to do anything useful, but it *did* work, kinda!
bobsbbq said:
I don't have any problems with this and I run 18 usually, But I have tried 64 mb and still everything works. I just don't think after a certain amount of pagepool increase you don't see any more benefit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it must have been something else then...
g.lewarne said:
yup, i did!
it was very sloooooooow to boot and even slooooooooower to do anything useful, but it *did* work, kinda!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This pretty much shows (again) that the 576 is real. I'll try it myself today. I will also try to create a 448 pagepool on the same rom with the extra 128 mb disabled. Just to double check.
p-kirill said:
nice
i played alot with pp=0
nothing interesting
now i use default HTC value (15)
tell us about what you will get
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you experience a relevant difference between pp=0 and pp=15?
----
Furthermore, I was wondering what the default pp size is of the HTC roms.
From my experience 0 will work just fine as it is dynamic but I find that with it set at say 16-20 things seem faster, more instant. I don't know if it has to due with the dynamic scaling or what.
bobsbbq said:
From my experience 0 will work just fine as it is dynamic but I find that with it set at say 16-20 things seem faster, more instant. I don't know if it has to due with the dynamic scaling or what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's dynamic, you say? But than it can be used to test the real size of the ram with the method described above. Or?
appelflap said:
It's dynamic, you say? But than it can be used to test the real size of the ram with the method described above. Or?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you find a method to fill the page pool completly yes, but if I remember correctly it was already proven the 576mb is for real.
EpiphanyNL said:
if you find a method to fill the page pool completly yes, but if I remember correctly it was already proven the 576mb is for real.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it was. I just wanted to do another test. Just to be sure.
appelflap said:
Yes it was. I just wanted to do another test. Just to be sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha never can be sure enough eh?
I've tried 18 and 16 before, and find 24MB much better.
Now I've by default set my pp to 64MB.
zenkinz said:
I've tried 18 and 16 before, and find 24MB much better.
Now I've by default set my pp to 64MB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i find 24mb better as well. is 64mb pp stable enough?
gianton said:
i find 24mb better as well. is 64mb pp stable enough?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always set ozrom, kumar's to 64mb before flashing and they have been stable so far.
Hi there!
1st of all I'm new to page pool stuff. I've heard about it though but it always seemed to much work for me.
As i got my HD2 i finally got interested working with pp. (Memory is not an issue anymore on the HD2) =]
Also, there was something about the relation between pp and battery life, is this true?
I'm always for the lookout for clean and fast ROM's but this seems to be a big factor too.
(Can anyone give me some advice on (Dutch) ROM's and a good pp setting?)
Hi, does anyone know how to fix the camera fps on the original 2.1? Thanks!
khankuan said:
Hi, does anyone know how to fix the camera fps on the original 2.1? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best suggestion I can give you is...
Upgrade to 2.2
haha tried.. decided to go back to old rom and charge my phone every 3 days instead of 1.. but camera fix will be pretty nice though
try a different camera app, such as lgcamera. free on the market, and lets you choose fps and stuff.
Oic, will try that when i fix my sbf first :S
hmm okies lgcamera doesnt really help. couldnt even record. i saw dexter mention about the libraries. Is is possible to port the libraries over and will it work just by porting them?
Thanks
Personnally, I set autokiller with others values by changing install-recovery.sh, I overclock to [email protected] vsel and I modify readahead.kb file with 512 value by install-recovery.sh.
For autokiller, it's good to test with app autokiller first.
I have less freeze in records.
If someone is interest about that, I will post my settings in few days.
EDIT : not with 512 value, 2048 is better
Zachary57 said:
Personnally, I set autokiller with others values by changing install-recovery.sh, I overclock to [email protected] vsel and I modify readahead.kb file with 512 value by install-recovery.sh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about install-recovery.sh. It sounds quite useful. Do you have a link?
How to use install-recovery.sh?
Thanks!!
I just modifiy install-recovery.sh files in /etc/ and I add lines :
#To improve sd card read/write
echo "2048" > /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb
#To modify autokiller settings
echo "3072,2048,9216,15360,15360,20480" > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree
I found tip for sd card in another forum and for memorykiller, app autokiller can do it.
I don't know if it's really improve something a lot but I find it's better so, you can try if you want.
wow yes it helped a lot. much smoother now like khal's rom. Thanks again! =)
For me, it's work but I have again small freeze in records. But I think motorola have to do something to fix record. They sell a phone with a 8MP camera but we can't record without freeze.
PS : If you have problems with games that are in sd card change 2048 by 256,512 or 1024 default value is 128 but if you removes lines its come to 128 by itself.
hmm but the 8MP don't have anything to do with video quality?
but that is right.. it's absolutely a cheek that video quality is that low
edit: or did I understand you the wrong way :??
Knoedelkopf said:
hmm but the 8MP don't have anything to do with video quality?
but that is right.. it's absolutely a cheek that video quality is that low
edit: or did I understand you the wrong way :??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You understood, I find it's not fair to have a so bad video quality they sell this phone and it's write that it's record at 720p.
Mioze7Ae said:
I don't know about install-recovery.sh. It sounds quite useful. Do you have a link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I good understood, install-recovery.sh is a startup script so, if you add command to this file, they are execute at startup but I don't know if it's work with superusers commands.
khankuan said:
Hi, does anyone know how to fix the camera fps on the original 2.1? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a friend who also owns an xt720. he told me that once he downloaded an app called vignette(a camera app), the photo taking quality of the camera improved a lot!! but its not free however but he tld me that it was dfinately worth the buy! Hope this helps!!
2.1 allows battery to last 3 days?!
Sent from my XT720 using XDA App
eejin2 said:
2.1 allows battery to last 3 days?!
Sent from my XT720 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It lasts 3 days?? Im also from singapore and im running rooted stock 2.1 xt720. usually mine lasts for a day. Would the battery calibration app help me?
(NOTE: I am NOT responsible for any damage to your tablet caused by this driver, yourself, your dog/cat, your drink, ect.)
(NOTE #2: Not currently available.)
I'm working on a modified driver for the Dell Venue 8 Pro, mainly to increase the amount of RAM dedicated to the graphics..
My goal is to increase the dedicated video memory from 32MB to 64MB/128MB/256MB (64MB is probably the safest, but I am aiming for 128MB), which *should* increase performance in some desktop games (I.e. Batman: Arkham Asylum).
It will be based off official drivers from Dell/Intel.
I'll try to have a version up soon for testing (I myself may or may not test it depending on the circumstances). ;D
1/24/15
-Intel Released Driver Update on 1/21/2015
-Development Will Continue with 11/2/2013 Driver
I will be willing to test.
TravisAntonio said:
I will be willing to test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. Unfortunately I haven't had time to work on it with Christmas almost here.
Lincoln99 said:
Awesome. Unfortunately I haven't had time to work on it with Christmas almost here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anything you can let me know via PM or Instant messaging.
Well, Windows Technical Preview decided not to load Windows Explorer anymore, so development is now on hold.
Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
Lincoln99 said:
Well, Windows Technical Preview decided not to load Windows Explorer anymore, so development is now on hold.
Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I can be of help for anything just let me know.
So,I changed my bios from ao4 to a09 and then to a03 and then I went to bios and changed dedicated memory for graphic to 128mb and everything looks in system okey like you can see in this sreenshot (sorry for polish ^^) but i dont have response in games.I tried Civilization V and Football Manager 2015 and only in menu football manager i can tell difrence-it's faster but when you are in match there's no diffrence :x(on civ5 i play on low/medium and in fm15 i tried medium settings) Can someone tell me why games don't play better? Thanks and sorry for my English
Areko7 said:
So,I changed my bios from ao4 to a09 and then to a03 and then I went to bios and changed dedicated memory for graphic to 128mb and everything looks in system okey like you can see in this sreenshot (sorry for polish ^^) but i dont have response in games.I tried Civilization V and Football Manager 2015 and only in menu football manager i can tell difrence-it's faster but when you are in match there's no diffrence :x(on civ5 i play on low/medium and in fm15 i tried medium settings) Can someone tell me why games don't play better? Thanks and sorry for my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, A03 has that option?
As for game performance, not a lot of games will benefit depending on system requirements.
Sent from my One S
Lincoln99 said:
So, A03 has that option?
As for game performance, not a lot of games will benefit depending on system requirements.
Sent from my One S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it has.
So,only in several games i will see a better performance? I tested six guns and asphalt and there's no diffrent than yesterday
Areko7 said:
Yes it has.
So,only in several games i will see a better performance? I tested six guns and asphalt and there's no diffrent than yesterday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those games, I think, don't use that much dedicated memory. How did you downgrade to A03?
Sent from my One S
Lincoln99 said:
Those games, I think, don't use that much dedicated memory. How did you downgrade to A03?
Sent from my One S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just downloaded bios from dell page and installed. It warn me that dell don't recommend downgrading but i choose yes option and it works ;d
What game i should test where i will see this 128mb ?
Areko7 said:
I just downloaded bios from dell page and installed. It warn me that dell don't recommend downgrading but i choose yes option and it works ;d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright. I'll try this later.
Sent from my One S
Lincoln99 said:
Alright. I'll try this later.
Sent from my One S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a option to give it even 512mb but is it safe? :v
Areko7 said:
There is a option to give it even 512mb but is it safe? :v
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it's shared memory, so you should be fine.
Sent from my One S
Ok.
So,I tested this little monster in 3dmark and... that changing memory gives nothing in performance :x
1 is default settings (32mb,gfx boost off)
2 is default but boost on
3 is all for max (512mb boost on and other stuff that i dont remeber :v)
As you can see 3 get the best but it cut me 500 mb ram,so i recommend 32 mb
By the way,that boost is nasty, it's giving 1000 points and about 5 fps ;p
Thanks
Areko7 said:
Ok.
So,I tested this little monster in 3dmark and... that changing memory gives nothing in performance :x
1 is default settings (32mb,gfx boost off)
2 is default but boost on
3 is all for max (512mb boost on and other stuff that i dont remeber :v)
As you can see 3 get the best but it cut me 500 mb ram,so i recommend 32 mb
By the way,that boost is nasty, it's giving 1000 points and about 5 fps ;p
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say more dedicated memory would help with CoD, or even something like GTA IV, of which I hear needs a good bit of dedicated memory.
EDIT: The A03 BIOS isn't listed under Other Versions on Dell's site, what model do you have? I have the 5000 series.
Sent from my One S
Lincoln99 said:
I'd say more dedicated memory would help with CoD, or even something like GTA IV, of which I hear needs a good bit of dedicated memory.
EDIT: The A03 BIOS isn't listed under Other Versions on Dell's site, what model do you have? I have the 5000 series.
Sent from my One S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 5830
http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=C7Y36
That's where i downloaded it
Areko7 said:
I have 5850
http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=C7Y36
That's where i downloaded it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah. I have the 5830.
Sent from my One S
Lincoln99 said:
Ah. I have the 5830.
Sent from my One S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote this wrong xD
Just edited it