Just like xda I ? From 128 mb to 256 mb maybe ?
sleekool said:
Just like xda I ? From 128 mb to 256 mb maybe ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although one never knows , I don't think HTC will release an XDA2 device with 256 MB RAM. The thing with XDA1 was that at the time when the 32 MB device was launched, 64 MB was a standard with other PocketPC PDA's. So they decided to produce also a 64 MB version in order to be able to "compete".
PavelR.
thanks for the reply.. Maybe soon when 256 mb PDAs will become prominent
are there any 256MB pda's about at all ?
the problem with more and more mem is that
programs will inc in size aswell evening it all out
better screen
More realistic rumours follow the move to a screen resolution of VGA 640x480.
Toshiba have produced devices with this in a 4inch screen. PPC 2004 appears to be a native 640x480 resolution. So keep your eyes out.
Just like the title means... i have a killer question
My little brother has a Cingular 8125, here are the aspects:
(WM5)
cpu : OMAP8590
speed : 195 mghz
ram: 64 MB
flash size: 128 MB
flash chip type: m-systems
bus: 16 bits
Storage size: 42 MB
mine are on a O2 xda iis (blue angel)
(WM6)
cpu: intel (r) PXA263
speed: 400 mghz
ram size 128 MB
flash size 32 MB
flash chip type: 28F128K3
bus: 32 bits
Storage size: 60 MB
ratio 1.02.10
both with 230 x 320 lcd screens with 65536 colors.
I just have moved (after reading A LOT!) to windows mobile 6.... i grab his pda just to compare, and he has A LOT of speed than mine
It's because of the rom that i had installed? (it's the one with the sticky on the threads on WM6 around the corner in here)
or because the WM edition itself
In advanced, thanxs, its a big big thing because if i am right, i had at least the double that he has, so, all of this is not right... right????
please, anything will be welcome!
ppchkn said:
Just like the title means... i have a killer question
My little brother has a Cingular 8125, here are the aspects:
(WM5)
cpu : OMAP8590
speed : 195 mghz
ram: 64 MB
flash size: 128 MB
flash chip type: m-systems
bus: 16 bits
Storage size: 42 MB
mine are on a O2 xda iis (blue angel)
(WM6)
cpu: intel (r) PXA263
speed: 400 mghz
ram size 128 MB
flash size 32 MB
flash chip type: 28F128K3
bus: 32 bits
Storage size: 60 MB
ratio 1.02.10
both with 230 x 320 lcd screens with 65536 colors.
I just have moved (after reading A LOT!) to windows mobile 6.... i grab his pda just to compare, and he has A LOT of speed than mine
It's because of the rom that i had installed? (it's the one with the sticky on the threads on WM6 around the corner in here)
or because the WM edition itself
In advanced, thanxs, its a big big thing because if i am right, i had at least the double that he has, so, all of this is not right... right????
please, anything will be welcome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See your other thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=326838
hello to all,
I had an ozone a month ago that had 192 mb of ram.
I had it bricked, and got a new one - but this one only reports 128 mb of ram.
What's the deal with this? Is my new ozone deffective?
They both report 111 mb of software ram - one said "os program memory: 68 mb" and the other one reports 16.4 mb. But both phones have 111.53 mb of usable ram.
Why is this?
Thanks-
Tomi
HTC still sites it as having 192mb of ram so I'd go back to whoever you got the phone from an explain the situation.
Source: http://www.htc.com/us/product/HTCOzone/specification.html
that is odd... But this would be my third phone replacement from Verizon. It's really not a "big" deal - but I find it weird that with the 192 mb ram phone the OS program memory was 68 mb and with the 128 mb one it was 16. So I'm wondering here if phones with 192 mb of ram have "bulk" ram or something - afterall, if it's 68 mb on those ozones, shouldn't it be 68 mb on the ones with 128 mb of ram?
Greetings - i found out that there are 2 versions of the HTC universal out there
a 64 MB and a 128MB version.
does this mean the Ram size or the ROM size?
regarding to PDAComparer where they compare the devices - ALL of them have 128MB ROM and 64MB Ram
got a VPA4 from vodaphone
(1) what is the difference
(2) do i have a 64 or a 128 device?
There is no original 128MB version. The ones you see are made by exchanging the 2 32MB ram chips with 64mb ones.
If you don't know, you have a 64MB device. If you bought it new, then it's 64MB, 100%. If second hand, the seller would have told you if he'd made an upgrade.
The difference is less memory problems : being able to run WM6.5.x and having enough memory left over to actually run programs is good. Or so I presume, I don't actually have a 128MB device.
So, im trying to find out how the X10 has its ram etc set out.
Is it a 256mb chip for ram, a 128mb chip for graphics and then a 1gb chip for the OS and user data?
Or is it just 1 1.5/2GB chip that is partitioned into sections for ram, os, userdata etc.
Dose anyone know an answer to this?
Cheers
Seansmit17 said:
So, im trying to find out how the X10 has its ram etc set out.
Is it a 256mb chip for ram, a 128mb chip for graphics and then a 1gb chip for the OS and user data?
Or is it just 1 1.5/2GB chip that is partitioned into sections for ram, os, userdata etc.
Dose anyone know an answer to this?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the memory
$ cat /proc/iomem
03000000-031fffff : kgsl_phys_memory
03000000-031fffff : kgsl
20000000-2dffffff : System RAM
2002b000-20488fff : Kernel text
2048a000-205c2c9b : Kernel data
30000000-37efffff : System RAM
37fe0000-37ffffff : ram_console
a0000000-a001ffff : kgsl_reg_memory
a0300000-a0300fff : msm_sdcc.1
a0400000-a0400fff : msm_sdcc.2
a0700000-a0700004 : audio_base_addr
a0800000-a08003ff : msm_hsusb_periphera
a0900000-a0900fff : msm_serial_hs.1
a0a00000-a0a007ff : msm_nand_phys
a1200000-a1200fff : spi_base
a1200000-a1200fff : spi_qsd
a9900000-a9900fff : msm_i2c.0
a9900000-a9900fff : msm_i2c
a9a00000-a9a00fff : msm_serial.0
a9a00000-a9a00fff : msm_serial
aa200000-aa2effff : mdp
aa300000-aa300fff : tssc
aa400000-aa400fff : tvenc
aa600000-aa600fff : pmdh
aa700000-aa700fff : emdh
Ciao Angelo
Soo, its all one chip then...
Hmmmm.... If that is the case would it not be posssible to change things a little and lose some space for user data and use it to give the X10 512mb of ram?
Seansmit17 said:
Soo, its all one chip then...
Hmmmm.... If that is the case would it not be posssible to change things a little and lose some space for user data and use it to give the X10 512mb of ram?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, we have
20000000-2dffffff : System RAM 234881023 B (223 MB)
30000000-37efffff : System RAM 133169151 B (126 MB)
and
37fe0000-37ffffff : ram_console 131072 B (128 KB)
Ciao Angelo
ardf69 said:
No, we have
20000000-2dffffff : System RAM 234881023 B (223 MB)
30000000-37efffff : System RAM 133169151 B (126 MB)
and
37fe0000-37ffffff : ram_console 131072 B (128 KB)
Ciao Angelo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok but you still not said.. yes its one chip or no its more than 1 chip.
But i find it ard to belive that SE would put in a 128mb chip, a 256mb and a tiny 128k chip lol
Could someone who knows pleas just post straight up the RAM e.g. 512mb with 128mb for graphics and 384mb for user??? or is it 256mb plus 128mb for graphics equaling 384mb RAM???
Hmm, I'm wondering what the problem is - remember that the X10 has 384MB of RAM. Just checking on my VMware host that runs Ubuntu and the 64bit version of Firefox (the app with the largest resident memory usage - apart from VMware VM's of course) only uses 31MB - so that's not even 10% of the available. Okay, I realise that firefox also uses a shedload of virtual too - but the question remains - what exactly is it in Gingerbread that suddenly needs the same minimum RAM as Windows XP does/did?
If it's not a single system image that's causing the problem, then what's wrong with paging to SD (yes, I know "it's slow stupid!" is high up the reasons)? Surely if paging to SD is permitted then it'd be relatively straightforward to provide a system setting that allowed a portion of the SD card to be reserved. These days you can get a relatively speedy (10MB/s min) Class 10 uSD card for about £27 (US$40) from Amazon, (8GB Kingmax if anyone's interesteD), and I'm guessing that there's probably not 100's of MB to be paged. In which case surely this is doable - especially if you're using a relatively modern, clever paging algorithm.
Just strikes me as a little strange that Google - with all the high-powered talent that they've got - couldn't figure a way to get their "latest and greatest" working on more of the current devices out there in Android land. Don't forget that there's other phones out there with the same or less internal memory than the X10 - e.g. Samsung Galaxy Portal, HTC Hero; Wildfire; and Legend, Motorola Milestone/Droid, and I'm sure a more detailed search could show others.
RAM: 384MB
ROM+Storage: 1GB (SLC)
Video: ?MB is a AMD Z430, like google nexus one, htc desire and htc hd2
Ram and Rom are not the same chip
The X10 has 256 MB RAM and 128 MB for graphics.
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk
I thought that the Virtual Memory of the Xperia x10 is shared for both RAM and VRAM?!? Now I am confused a little bit more...
https://twitter.com/SonyEricssonNA
Yes, SonyEricsson Answered to me. The Xperia has 384 MB of RAM.
mymagicmyhero said:
I thought that the Virtual Memory of the Xperia x10 is shared for both RAM and VRAM?!? Now I am confused a little bit more...
https://twitter.com/SonyEricssonNA
Yes, SonyEricsson Answered to me. The Xperia has 384 MB of RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah we know. 256MB RAM and 128MB VRAM
Seansmit17 said:
yeah we know. 256MB RAM and 128MB VRAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the memory and the fb memory are separated. If you see /proc/iomem we have
(256 MB)
0x20000000-0x2dffffff 224 MB RAM
0x2e000000-0x2fffffff 32 MB ?????? NOT MAPPED, WHY?
(128 MB)
0x30000000-0x37efffff 127 MB
0x37f00000-0x37ffffff 128 KB
while with dmesg you can read that fb memory is
<6>[ 2.152940] msm_fb_probe: phy_Addr = 0x2b00000 virt = 0x98800000
<6>[ 2.154160] MDP HW Base phy_Address = 0xaa200000 virt = 0x98200000
<6>[ 2.155446] primary mddi base phy_addr = 0xaa600000 virt = 0x98014000
Ciao Angelo