try this to speed up your pocket pc, good programs , try for xda II at 530 mhz
I would have prefered you post all the warnings of using such utlity ... for some unexperienced users this could permanently damage their devices.
For all folks here ... pay all attention to the heat while working on high speeds ... and don't ever try ROM flashing on any speed but the default one (206 for XDA and 400 for XDA II)
Ive been running Gameboy Advance and SNES roms, using XPU scalar @ 530Mhz for hours and hours. The device gets VERY hot after 5 hours, but it still fights on without a restart...
Although, ive tried other clocking apps @ 600mhz and then it got so hot it restarted itself...
I use Pocket Hack Master and have had my device up to 1689Mhz without any ill effects, though this is apparently unusually quick for an XdaII - the SDRAM usually can't handle 147MHz.
With PHM, mine scales between 399MHz and 589MHz depending purely on load, I've been using it for about three months with no apparent problems.
I tried it on i-mate ... the device is frozen if I use 530 MHz
Mine runs fine at 530 and 473... I even did a benchmark in BetaPlayer; huge improvement at 530; however, I decided to back it off to 400 to save on batteries.
Biso007 said:
I tried it on i-mate ... the device is frozen if I use 530 MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the SDRAM can't handle the 133MHz - it's the first thing that usually falls over. You could put the multiplier down to 1/2x from 1x and it would probably work but that would mean your RAM was only running at 66MHz.
ok i must be real tired...
how the heck do you install this program from those files??
Questions :
- At 472 MHz as well as at 530 MHz, the memory is underclocked (50 - 66 MHz). I ask if it would be possible to maintain the memory around 100 MHz (+/- 10 MHz) during the overclock.
- Does the XScale CPU have the frequency fixed at 400 MHz ? Intel didn't think to dinamical frequence switch ? (like in Centrino or P4M) ? Because if not, then this software would allow battery economy. But it's weird, Intel wasn't able to do the same thing ???
With PHM you can choose whether to 1/2x or 1x clock the SDRAM and the LCD. I use 1x, so when I'm running the CPU at 590, the memory is running at 147MHz, most Xda II's won't handle this but it appears I was really lucky and got very good RAM in mine.
Mi_ said:
Questions :
- At 472 MHz as well as at 530 MHz, the memory is underclocked (50 - 66 MHz). I ask if it would be possible to maintain the memory around 100 MHz (+/- 10 MHz) during the overclock.
- Does the XScale CPU have the frequency fixed at 400 MHz ? Intel didn't think to dinamical frequence switch ? (like in Centrino or P4M) ? Because if not, then this software would allow battery economy. But it's weird, Intel wasn't able to do the same thing ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure in underclocked? I am sure the memory clock is set to standard freq. with all the benefits,like stability and faster processor clock (472-530)
You can verify it downloading other Overclocking applications,like made from Mamaich.
I verify with CPUID, it shows all PDA frequencies. I can post screenshots, at 530 MHz, the memory runs in 66 MHz.
That's why I posted my question.
err..so whats the best setting when using the XCPUScaler?
And how come cannot access settings for over 500Mhz? Mine goes up to 475only
In Option select 'show frequencies over 500mhz'
Mi_ said:
I verify with CPUID, it shows all PDA frequencies. I can post screenshots, at 530 MHz, the memory runs in 66 MHz.
That's why I posted my question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Mamaich Overclock program with:
L 27
M 4
N 1,5
You will obtain SDRAM and MEM LCD 100mhz,CPU 597mhz PXBUS 199mhz
I've Benchmarked it with GX BenchMark with no good results.
So,best performance for gaming you will obtain on 530Mhz
unapproachable2kx said:
Use Mamaich Overclock program with:
L 27
M 4
N 1,5
You will obtain SDRAM and MEM LCD 100mhz,CPU 597mhz PXBUS 199mhz
I've Benchmarked it with GX BenchMark with no good results.
So,best performance for gaming you will obtain on 530Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done that.
But at 530 MHz, my memory cames down to 66 MHz thus not 133 MHz, I think it doesn't support anything above 100-105 MHz.
Now I want to benchmark myself , I'll try to find GX Benchmark.
I only regret the downclocking function of CPUScalar, that saves battery (can somebody confirm ?)
Re: download xpu scalar (speed up ur ppc to 530 mhz) for fre
Prada said:
try this to speed up your pocket pc, good programs , try for xda II at 530 mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you tell me how to install even I copied all the files to my XDA2 .[/quote]
After many hard-resets,installation of system files and progrs..
I can finally assure that CALLER-ID program seriously give conflicts on overclocked Cpu frequencies,more than 472Mhz..(like 530,ecc..)
And drains more battery power.
Just let you know..
Now is your choice..
To tell u the truth, i use xCPUScalar for a month in advanced mode:
0-15% - 300
16-40% -400
41-70% -472
71 -100 -530 and have no problems at all.
BTW - CallerID is a very uncertain subj by itself.
i also use xCPUScalar for a month in advanced mode:
0-15% - 200
16-40% -400
41-70% -400
71 -100 -472 and have no problems at all.
But I don't see where I can get over the 472 limit??
I have a XDA (QTEK 2020) with a 400MHZ chip.
I see you guys talking about 500 and more sometime???
and this is possible, where XCPUScalar indicate 472 MAX ?
Thank you
PS: OK I get it, I just forget to enable the "show frequency over 500MHZ"
Now I see 530MHZ.
Juste hope it's fine like this.
Hello, in the past i was the owner of an Qtek S200, witch can be easyly overclocked to 266Mhz. Now i'm asking about if the HTC Magic CPU can be overclocked over the factory specs..
What happens if i modify the user.conf max cpu scaling from 528 to 628? It will works?
Hey all, really simple here, just curious as to what settings people have when undervolting their cpu's. Thanks in advance.
1200 - 1.2875
1100 - 1.25
800 - 1.1875
600 - 1.0
300 - .8125
I think this is about the norm.
cm7 n155 / conservative / 16 bit / nenamark1 22.9 neocore 29.9 quadrant 2642
300 @ .8125v
600 @ 1.0v
800 @ 1.1625v
1100 @ 1.2375v
1200 @ 1.2875v
First of all sorry if I posted in the wrong place please someone guide me to where it is supposed to be if i did post in the wrong place, so I have an I9500 running CM13, I downloaded kernal auditor from the Google play store and noticed that I only have the option of editing 4 cores and they all have a Max limit of 1600MHz so I'm assuming those are the A15 set of cores,, so my question is pretty simple, does my current rom make use of both the A7 and A15 clusters (I am aware that they never run simultaneously) I'll include pictures about details on my rom, thanks in advance
Well the screenshot refuses to be uploaded so:
CyanogenMod version: 13.0-20160828-unofficial-gearCM-i9500
Kernal version: 3.4.5-cyanogenmod-gd795889
[email protected] #1
Sun Aug 28 22:30:39 CEST 2016
Build number: cm_I9500-userdebug 6.0.1 MOB30Z
2c597c319e
Test-keys
It could also be that Kernel Adiutor can't access the A7 cores.
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup just like kras said so if it shows lower than 800 then it shows the little cores, for example, 600mhz in kernel adiutor is actually 1200mhz a7 freq, 500mhz is 1000mhz a7 and so on
krasCGQ said:
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the A15 cores would never run below 800 (or 700 if under clocked)?
jwchen17 said:
yup just like kras said so if it shows lower than 800 then it shows the little cores, for example, 600mhz in kernel adiutor is actually 1200mhz a7 freq, 500mhz is 1000mhz a7 and so on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see so 200MHz on kernal auditor would actually be 400MHz A7 etc. That poses another question, I understand that the A15 cores CAN on stock image run at below 800MHz, or is that incorrect
The mad charizard99 said:
So the A15 cores would never run below 800 (or 700 if under clocked)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's how the CPU works.
The mad charizard99 said:
I see so 200MHz on kernal auditor would actually be 400MHz A7 etc. That poses another question, I understand that the A15 cores CAN on stock image run at below 800MHz, or is that incorrect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Below 800 MHz it would switch to A7 core respectively.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
These 3 are given:
Balanced = 1 GHz CPU / 468 MHz GPU
Quick = 1.4 GHz CPU / 768 MHz GPU
Performance = 1.7 GHz CPU / 920 MHz GPU
However, it has two other, low-end settings.
Power Save:
Efficiency:
These two lower settings do save on battery, but you can't even emulate PS1 games with them properly. It makes me wonder what the clock speeds for those two are, though.
KernelTasker allows for more, if you are rooted.