Related
Hi,
Is it possible ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=1539468&posted=1
Thks !
elf's cpu
CPU: 32bit Texas Instruments OMAP 850
nike's cpu
CPU: 32bit Qualcomm MSM7200 (SoC)
because nikes is called touch II dont mean that they have the same cpu
nikes cpu have onchip gps
not sure if elf's does
names can be very decieving
Thx for precision.
How're arm11 processors? Is it like the droid's processors which is clocked at 550 but has great gpu clocks?
Beautiful processor!
lapalways05 said:
How're arm11 processors? Is it like the droid's processors which is clocked at 550 but has great gpu clocks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better yet can the arm 11 processor be over clocked to 800?
which ARM11 platform does boot the linux kernel ?
I am wondering which ARM11 platform does boot the linux kernel ? And where to start for Nokia E7 (BCM2727)
Regards
--
http://rzr.online.fr/q/arm
Just pointing out any processor that is ARMv6 or ARMv7 is considered ARM11. So the MT3GS is an ARM11 processor and of course it runs on a linux kernel. That is exactly what Android is, a flavor of Linux.
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA Premium App
So I thought the epic had the hummingbird CPU?
Why do all info say its an arm V7 revision 2?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
It is a Hummingbird processor. It's actually based on the ARM Cortex A8 architecture. Hummingbird is the codename for the Samsung and Intrinsity developed part. So the processor is named Hummingbird, but it's based on the ARM architecture. It's kind of like how Intel makes Pentiums and AMD makes Phenoms, but they're both x86-64 architecture processor.
Is it true that Qualcomm's dual-core CPU's will be based on the older ARM Cortex-A8 architecture set instead of the modern Cortex-A9 which is being used by Apple's A5 Chip and Nvidia'S Tegra 2 ?
Source:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...msm8660-12ghz-dual-core-snapdragon-processor/
The hardware benchmarks on the dual-core MSM8x60 1.2 Ghz chip used by HTC Pyramid (Sensation,Doubleshot) and the Evo-3D do not look pretty good.
Source:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=258
Need a bit of clarification on this issue why they didn't choose the Cortex-A9 path.
Ok so I just read this report from Qualcomm explaining this issue:
http://www.qualcomm.de/documents/files/linley-report-dual-core-snapdragon.pdf
Apparently their architecture set is compatible with ARM's instruction architecture set and they claim its better than the A9.
"The superscalar CPU uses a 13-stage pipeline to generate faster clock speeds than competing products can achieve using ARM’s Cortex-A8 or Cortex-A9"
Having said that still not sure why the hardware benchmarks are not near the Cortex-A9 dual-core processors.
Adreno-220 is pretty good though compared to other GPU's.
mjehan said:
Apparently their architecture set is compatibily with ARM's instruction architecture set and they claim its better than the A9.
Having said that still not sure why the hardware benchmarks are not near the Cortex-A9 dual-core processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because bechmarks are meaningless and HTC have yet to put the work into fiddling them yet!
Quamcomm has been claiming that their design is better than ARM's Cortex A8 before but other than few special occasions, they are mostly equal at the same clock speed. Since MSM8x60 is also based on the identical cores, I don't see how it could be better than Cortex A9. In fact, Qualcomm is working on their own "equivalent to A9" version right now.
FYI, # of pipelines don't tell the whole story about the speed of CPUs. If not implemented well, it will simply cause longer stall delays. We have seen this in the old Pentium 4 architectures.
I think the 128bit fpu makes scorpion equivalent to a9 in floating points calculation
Sent via psychic transmittion.
I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
PanosAd113 said:
I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Snapdragon version and its laggy. From time to time i get stutter switching app to app and navigating through the interface . GPU too is not superb, Clash of Clans plays smooth at the beginning but after a couple of minutes the frame rate stutter. I did a full reset but the same result hopefully will be fix on future updates. I have a zenfone and that performs better than my A7 (snapdragon version) in terms of gaming. Considering the price of A7 im a liitle bit dissapointed by its performance, battery life is good though i can get to 20 hours using light to moderate usage.
I guess you have to get the Exynos version in my own opinion.
PanosAd113 said:
I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 is better for gaming
SD 615 is 64 bit CPU and works fine when updated to Lollipop. I have seen no lags while gaming.