Database Users

Some Desire HD benchmarks

Hi if anyone wanted to know how the desire HD stacks up here are some benchmarks.
Quadrant = ~1800
Linpack = ~40
Neocore = ~58 fps
Uploding a video now :-D
[EDIT]
Video Taking Ages To Upload ...... here are some 0xBenchmark comparisons of the GalaxyS / Desire HD / Desire
http://0xbenchmark.appspot.com/run/[email protected]/GalaxyS

cool!
That Quadrant is a little lower than others have posted. I saw a vid on youtube of it reaching over 2000!

Just did quadrant again and got 1998 so yer 1800 - 2000 sounds right
:-D

having a higher neocore score means this phone does 3D better compared to galaxy s? Any game demo review on the DHD? really wanna see how does it does 3D gaming like asphalt or sandstorm - modern combat (multi touch intense)

------ Added 0xBenchmark to first post ------​

override182 said:
having a higher neocore score means this phone does 3D better compared to galaxy s? Any game demo review on the DHD? really wanna see how does it does 3D gaming like asphalt or sandstorm - modern combat (multi touch intense)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR

Beards said:
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats why.. hurm.. too bad then, having a higher neocore than the SGS dosent do any good..

Beards said:
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't this just an optimization issue?

real life apps
but how does the phone perform in normal use apps? Because i'm thinking about getting the phone but i would like the phone to perform better in apps like psx4Droid than my desire does now.
So does anybody know anything about this ?

Galaxy s phones are limited to 56 fps, check the results for a more demanding benchmark like nenamark
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

android53 said:
Galaxy s phones are limited to 56 fps, check the results for a more demanding benchmark like nenamark
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then whats the use of having a theoretical 90mil triangle p/s hardware but it cant reach higher than 56fps.. hurm.. such a waste..

override182 said:
then whats the use of having a theoretical 90mil triangle p/s hardware but it cant reach higher than 56fps.. hurm.. such a waste..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Erm. No. The vsync on the screens is 60fps anyway, so rendering faster than that is mostly useless. Also, if you are rendering a more complex scene, you will still have a higher fps with the 90M triangle hardware, it just won't go over 60.

jords12 said:
Erm. No. The vsync on the screens is 60fps anyway, so rendering faster than that is mostly useless. Also, if you are rendering a more complex scene, you will still have a higher fps with the 90M triangle hardware, it just won't go over 60.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly... Anything over 60 is a waste.

Here is my quadrant results.

Look this
HTC Desire HD unboxing + Neocore + Linpack + Quadrant test
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=eTBE9OkDRnU

DevilzDontCry said:
but how does the phone perform in normal use apps? Because i'm thinking about getting the phone but i would like the phone to perform better in apps like psx4Droid than my desire does now.
So does anybody know anything about this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PSX4Droid runs slow. Quite disappointing. Im not playing PSX-games on Desire HD. Too many good games, and Desire HD doesn’t do the justice.

[OFFTOPIC] Motorola Xoom OC'd to 1.5GHz and benchmarked!

Motorola Xoom overclocked to 1.5GHz, eats Quadrant and Linpack for breakfast
Hold on to your hats, gents, because things just got real -- that's a Motorola Xoom in the picture above, clocked at a blazing 1.504GHz. While we highly doubt that's a new world record of any sort, the dual-core Tegra 2 inside seriously screams at that clockspeed, scorching Quadrant to the tune of 3105 (remember this?) and delivering 47 MFLOPS in Linpack. Oh, and in case you're curious, this achievement wasn't some random hack. It was perpetrated for our collective benefit by the master of SetCPU himself, and you'll find full video proof of his accomplishment below and instructions at our source link. Got root? Then you're on your way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey guess what? At 1.5GHz the Nexus S can break 4k without a sweat. Simms22, care to post some of your Quadrant scores
******Official Scoreboard*******
Premier DC Honeycomb Tablet: 0
Google Nexus S: 1

who cares quadrant sucks not to mention it still does not still work correctly with 2.3 i highly doubt its accurate with honeycomb and dualcore CPU
also you're talking about a 4k plus score with voodoo

demo23019 said:
who cares quadrant sucks does not still work correctly with 2.3 i highly doubt its accurate with honeycomb and dualcore CPU
also youre talking about a 4k plus score with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon? What do you mean by Voodoo? If you mean the ext4 hack then the 4k I am referring to was actually before the ext4 hack was implemented. And if its broken for both Gingerbread and Honeycomb then wouldn't it kind of negate the being broken? Since their both broken?
Why do people always have to **** all over everything? It was an interesting post and I found it funny that Engadget would use the phrase "eat for breakfast" when in reality 3.1k is not that impressive. Seriously though, why is it necessary to be an ass instead of just having a laugh? Clearly I posted this in good fun. JFC.

And only scores 47 MFLOPS when the nexus one snapdragon can score higher you going to say nexus one is faster than xoom and Nexus S i dont thin so
Being huge into PC benchmarking and im not impressed with what android currently has for software...Anything that can be manipulated into giving false result is bogus
reminds me of 3dmark vantage with nvidia cards giving off very high inaccurate CPU scores with physx is enabled
....Not saying vantage is bogus

demo23019 said:
And only scores 47 MFLOPS when the nexus one snapdragon can score higher you going to say nexus one is faster than xoom and Nexus S i dont thin so
Being huge into PC benchmarking and im not impressed with what android currently has for software...Anything that can be manipulated into giving false result is bogus
reminds me of 3dmark vantage with nvidia cards giving off very high inaccurate CPU scores with physx is enabled
....Not saying vantage is bogus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which benchmarks if any do you think are valid or quasi valid for the NS? I use Fps2D to test FPS

jlevy73 said:
Which benchmarks if any do you think are valid or quasi valid for the NS? I use Fps2D to test FPS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using an3DXL for benchmarking as well as nenamark. an3DXL gave results that had the lowest spread, while quadrant was all over the place, having as much as a 500 point different..

Acer Iconia A500 Full Benchmark Test

Iconia Tab A500 scored 1895 in the Benchmark test, see pics below.

stock i was getting 2100s also this need to be moved to general area no dev area.

i get well over 2300

I'd like to see how it stacks up against other HC tablets...

I got 2187 with CPU Tuner set to "performance"

i bought "set cpu" for 1.99 and set custom lowest 927 mhz highest 1ghz

This belongs in the general section -> has nothing to do with Dev

How do you guys get such high scores? On Engadget's review they state that they got 2200 - 2300 on Quadrant, however on my Tab I get around 1900 every time like the OP... Also on Linpack I get 37Gflops, Engadget say the Tab breaks 42Gflops... Is there a dual core optimized version of Quadrant and Linpack?

How many apps do u have.
also when they run benchmarks they normally kill all the tasked with advanced task killer before running.

I do a fresh reboot with all task killed, run them both get between 2100-2300 usually then about 43-45 teraflops

This has to be MegaFLOPS ya?? i mean TeraFLOPS a bit high expected from a RISC SOC isnt it? and by the way we need overclocked kernal for A500 I see Xoom hit 65 MFLOPS with 1.5GHz clock speed!

i rot 42,3 megaflops in linpack andere between 2200 - 2300 in quadrant...

i got 2400+ on Quadrant

Whatever I do I never get over 1930..

Do you have a live wallpaper on?

In quadrant, I normally get just under 2000 the first run, then if i run it a 2nd time my scores are between 2000 - 2300, just as mentioned.
Yea, it would be nice for a kernel hack, to speed up the a500 if needed. Its not a must for me, as battery times plays more of a factor.
Sent from my A500 using XDA Premium App

I got 2282.
CPU:7139 Mem:2484 I/O:1034 2D:86 3D:665

I just got 2339 on mine. Only had quadrant and avg antivirus thingy running.

2653 CPU 8627 mem 2512 I/O 1396 2d 87 3d 642

My £200 advent vega tab is well faster than my Iconia in both quadrant and smartbench 2011,#
Just one more reason to get this thing unlocked so we can get it over-clocked.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1102690

SG3 vs SG5

I made some test with my wifes phone - a galaxy 5 - and I was impressed with the performance. My wifes phone is totally stock (froyo), no root or deodex or other stuff but it has a Quadrant score of 520. My stock SG3 has a score of 321 and 607 with G3Mod and Kyrillos 8. So I did another test (Antutu) and checked the 2D and 3D performance. The stock SG5 has a 3D score of 450 while my SG3 only has 250. The RAM and CPU scores of the SG5 are lower than my scores. So I guess the reason for the high SG5 scores is the 3D grafics. But why is that? Is it because of the lower screen resolution, or the lower density, or the fewer colors, or ...? Maybe somebody can enlighten me.
Another issue. I put my old SD card in the SG5 and it has a reading speed of 9MB/s. When the card was in my phone I only had a reading speed of 4 MB/sec? Why is that?

The G3 has a CPU speed advantage (667MHz vs. 600Mhz) but the G5 has a lower-res screen (QVGA, vs. WQVGA) as an advantage....thats one of the main reason

To fix the reading speed of sdcard apply sdcardreadingspeedfix script
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App

@raja no that doesn't affect much
@op
G3 got a damn good processor (Samsung s5p6442) while g5 has a qualcomm
But g3 has a fimg gpu compared to the adreno200 in g5
And yea these scores are just scores, if we want we can even get 1000+, real life performance matters

ronnie735 said:
To fix the reading speed of sdcard apply sdcardreadingspeedfix script
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tryed - doesn't do a thing for me
@cedeai: thanx

this sdcardreadingspeedfix script did'nt work for me too

my sister has a sg5, compared to our phone is really fast, and also plays games better, like angry birds, without overclocking, and their port of cm7 is amazing

Benchmarks

Tegra got smoked
http://androidcommunity.com/galaxy-s-iii-quad-core-benchmarks-blow-us-away-20120503/

Hm.. Tegra 3 seems to win the GPU bench?
Quadrant sucks though. Will be waiting for more benchs.

Here are some other benchmarks (next to quandrant also SunSpider and browsermark)

Quadrant scores -
sgs3
cpu - 12781
memory - 4652
io - 7606
2d - 1000
3d - 2171
total - 5642
S4
cpu - 8505
memory - 7547
io - 6394
2d - 990
3d - 2204
total - 5128
tegra3
cpu - 12493
memory - 3472
io - 4769
2d - 962
3d - 2346
total - 4804
they seem pretty even in cpu/gpu capability. the s4 gets smoked in cpu performance according to those quadrant scores. interesting.. i thought it was faster.

Wow, the S3 doesn't seem to smoke the competition.

im interested about the antutu...can someone bring some more benchmarks?

Even if Tegra got smoked games will look better, so i'm really thinking how the S3 will be better in general use except for benchmarks...
Sent from my Quad Core Monster the HTC One X using Tapatalk v 2

GPU performance gap between Tegra3 and Exynos4 Quad is huge
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Faster than iPhone4S' powervr sgx543mp2

LOL quadrant sucks so hard. the new mali 400 is killing tegra 3. according to http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview

The benchmarked result http://www.icsforums.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-gets-benchmarked-shows-plenty-promise.html

bocautrang.pt said:
The benchmarked result http://www.icsforums.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-gets-benchmarked-shows-plenty-promise.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um no
That's stolen straight out of engadget and they have recorded the lowest performance out of any of these tech blog/news sites

Antutu Benchmark available here:

ph00ny said:
um no
That's stolen straight out of engadget and they have recorded the lowest performance out of any of these tech blog/news sites
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the video above it's got 5324 Quadrant and 11492 Antutu. Not much different from HOX.

Here are some results from the Swedish androidsite "Swedroid". It's in swedish (doh!) but you should be able to look thru the scores anyway
http://www.swedroid.se/hands-on-med-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-forhandsitt/#disqus_thread
In my humble opinion. To say that the exynos "kills" the Tegra 3 is just...plain...wrong.
They seem to be very capable CPUs in both of these beasts!

umd said:
In the video above it's got 5324 Quadrant and 11492 Antutu. Not much different from HOX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you see the gpu scores. Kills tegra 3.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Imo they are very close to eachother, i would say exynos wins by a little margin could be just the software dragging it down, would love to see a pure ICS build doing the test.

Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA

jits1988 said:
Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good benchmark do shows the raw power of the mobile, its never meant to test the user experience.

jits1988 said:
Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the hands-on video clip made it seemed as if s3 is doing great in general ui transitions. It was noticeably quicker when used side by side.

Always astounds me how people are judging by benchmarks. I mean, its a phone, not a server station.
I wont be running virtual machines for rendering movies on it. I wont be playing Crysis 3 on it.
I`ll phone, message, watch clips, pictures, surf and use navigation. Even the single core phones can do that perfectly.