My score in linpack are now around 35 sin e I updated....that's a drop of 10 to 15 points from before the update. Anyone else notice a drop in linpack?
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Do you have flash installed?
Also, what app do you use to check the linpack? [edit] nevermind. I found it.
33.614.
3.0.1 with flash installed.
36.14 when I uninstalled flash.
I know it's the same range, but it's strange how everything seems faster without flash installed. I've uninstalled and reinstalled it twice today to see if it made a difference, and I think I'm going to leave it uninstalled until next week.
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
First thing I did was unistall flash and then reboot....no good. Then I unintalled most of my apps, reboot, retest, same results. Using linpack app from market.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Does your Linpack score somehow have something to do with how your Xoom performs, real world?
muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
ilogik said:
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but that cannot be the only thing at work here. I mean the iPad2 is scoring 5x better than the Xoom in linpack. I highly doubt that the hardware is 5x better than the Xoom, especially when the iPad2's CPU is only clocked at 900mhz.
muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wth... just, wth.
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Usmc7356 said:
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anandtech. I would trust their numbers over any other site I can think of. They are legit. You can go check out the numbers in their preview of the iPad2.
Link to preview of iPad2:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2
link to relevant section:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2/2
Related
please post your quadrant scores so we can compare!
Quadrant doesn't mean much
even when you hit 2000+ score, your device still performs about the same in real life.
think about it
not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement
either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.
2200
Firmware JG5 + RyanZA's lag fix
alovell83 said:
either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my though
Also, quadrant only tests specific things.. Benchmarks are a tool, and it's easy to optimise for them, with much less gains to everything else..
1020 no lagfix jp2 "hk"
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Around 2500-2700
2244 using one click RyanZA's lag fix on JF5 firmware
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I got 2350 with lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
1675 lagfixed ^^ idk how ppl get 2K+
Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144
2245 and very happy.
Sent from galaxy s. JG4 + oneclick lag fix version 2.3
Andrewwelton said:
Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same here.
I wish people would stop posting quadrant requests everywhere. Any developer can tell you they don't always mean much..
ZSJH1 + OCLF
2121
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2241
2240
Stock JF4 + RyanZA's One click lagfix.
larryccf said:
not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even know why this happens? It just shows that the overall score is meaningless.
Yes, the lagfix makes the phone more responsive but you can compare it to other scores with the fix in place. You COULD get Quadrant Advanced and compare all the other bits (not I/O).
I got 910 with everything stock
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.
Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that
ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score
I know some of you think benchmarks are wack but I use them from time to time to see if im gaining any better performance from different roms and kernels. Used to use Quadrant all the time but a friend told me about AnTutu on the market. Don't know if any of you have used it, but its free and im kind digging it over Quadrant. Try it out if you haven't. Here are some screen shots.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning
Thanks will check it out.
Here's a link for anyone wanting to try it out.
Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant
Thanks for the heads up
dpaul007 said:
Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yeah im used to seeing my score at the top too. This bench gives out some useful info tho. More than the free version of quadrant. Don't know if I wanna pay 24 bucks for the pro version of quadrant to see how that is. Sure its a lot better than the free version. Im going to stick with this for a bit until I find something better.
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning
quadrant pro is bull does nothing but give "detailed" stats which means the same thing this does for free, the bar thing is colored and it gives GPU CPU etc.
After saying all that, i should admit...
I have Quadrant Advanced...
I'll check this out in a sec. thanks for sharing!
I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo
Sid 6.7 said:
I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****
Warchief337 said:
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good one lmao
Let's get this party started! Post your Nexus 7 benchmarks and please state what Android and ROM version are you on.
Of course the good news is that the new Nexus 7, although listed as Qualcomm S4 Pro (APQ8064-1AA), it is actually more like an underclocked Snapdragon 600 according to AnandTech, as it sports 4 Krait 300 CPU cores and 2 gigs of LPDDR3L RAM, so it's gonna be fast yet clocked at 1.5GHz more battery friendly.
AndroidCommunity benchmarks:
http://androidcommunity.com/nexus-7-2013-review-20130728/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ubergizmo benchmarks
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2013/07/nexus-7-2-review/
Screen benchmarks from Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7176/nexus-7-2013-mini-review/2
Could someone run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Let's see some numbers folks!
Ars Technica benchmarks
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...-meet-the-new-standard-for-android-tablets/2/
And just a quick close-up on text sharpness, iPad Mini, Nexus 7 2012, Nexus 7 2013
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Nate2 said:
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That chart is crazy. I was getting a headache even trying to find the nex 7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Richieboy67 said:
That chart is crazy. I was getting a headache even trying to find the nex 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the "Find on page" function of your browser for the word "Nexus".
Sent from my unrooted DroidX using Tapatalk 2
Nate2 said:
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the new Nexus isn't listed on that page. Though as a reference I scored 11,969 for my CPU with that app.
Nate2 said:
Could someone run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Nate2 said:
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is from mind using Jassy5 kernel @ 1782mhz stock rom.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Nate2 said:
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here ya go... Faux kernel clocked at 1.7ghz.... stock rom
Edit: I probably should have ran it with "performance" governor...
I'm really interested in 1.7GHz clock benchmarks, stability tests and battery info.
Share some, lads!
I flashed temasek cm13 and ran a benchmark test. Scores surprised me.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The score is not showing
44k how?
Unbeliveable high score.Is it possible in Redmi 2
sarath67 said:
Unbeliveable high score.Is it possible in Redmi 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks impossible. Antutu Must have some glitches...
Score is in red color
UX score is unbelievably high. Some glitch. Others please try antutu on cm13 temasek. Very stable rom
I had same with standard miui ROM.
This was my score when i was on rr of nick latest build 5.9
sc123001.11 said:
This was my score when i was on rr of nick latest build 5.9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why u all guys thinking its impossible may be of some tweaks in kernal of some in build.prop can make this type of score in antutu... Chill it's our device.... ????
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
zelendel said:
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
zelendel said:
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but those scores are based on Antutu's new scoring system.
nick37332001 said:
Yes but those scores are based on Antutu's new scoring system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still means less then nothing. The only people that even run these tests now are noobs and people trying to show off. Or companies trying to reel in the uninformed.
zelendel said:
Still means less then nothing. The only people that even run these tests now are noobs and people trying to show off. Or companies trying to reel in the uninformed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can say that but most importantly, the system must be stable and perform well in daily task
Sent from my 2014817
nick37332001 said:
Well you can say that but most importantly, the system must be stable and perform well in daily task
Sent from my 2014817
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. Which is why no one pays attention to the scores. It has no bearing on how a device runs day to day.