Related
Hello all,
i have been an owner of a nexus s gsm s-lcd since August 2011 and i have been experimenting mostly with cyanogenmod and cyanogenmod based roms such as nscollab.
Using my phone mainly for my jobs, since the beginning of the usage of non official roms, i am always having stability problems ending up not trusting my phone for everyday use.
I have tried cyanogenmod stable, rc, lots of nightly builds and various nscollab versions from 1.0.39.
From my experience so far, except when using matr1x 5.5 cfs i always have some of the following problems, some times some of them and sometimes all of them:
1. reboots
2. reboots with no ability to load the os, with only solution the removal of battery
3. crashes with the result of the pin needed to be given again
4. never waking up after deep sleep
The kernels i have used so far are all the matr1x cfs(sorry, i do not trust con Kolivas and his bfs, being a linux user for 10 years), various netarchy and the stock cyanogenmod .
The only kernel that has been stable for me until now is matr1x 5.5 cfs.
The reason for not going back to the official rom, and be ok with my mobile is mainly the bln and voodoo(although i have bought the paid app and i can use the module with the official rom) modules.
The first thing I though having all these problems is that the main cause of them would be the undervolting that all most of the kernels have. After some tests i realized that with the voltages that proton suggests or even with the stock voltages, the problems do not disappear.
Although, i have found my stable kernel and i always flash matr1x 5.5 cfs in all the roms i use, i would really like to know what is the usual suspect of all these problems. Is there any possibility that some of them are not kernel related and the cause is in the source code of cyanogenmod?
To sum up, i really believe that we should try an effort to create a kernel that is very close to the stock one, and be very careful with the extra modules that we add. Although i do not have the experience of making a kernel package for android, i will try for sure to make a flashable kernel for my needs, and if it's stable i will upload it and share with all of you.
I believe that every mobile has to be bug-free(as possible), and reliable for everyday use and at least i should be reboot-free.
I would really like to read other users experience and opinions.
Regards,
Michael
it was the same for me. nscollab was unusable since it was always freezing in two minutes after boot. changing the kernel did not help. so I decided to change the rom to Nexus MV 10.05. it works very stable (not a single reboot or freeze) and faster than nscollab.
mikkkg said:
The reason for not going back to the official rom, and be ok with my mobile is mainly the bln and voodoo(although i have bought the paid app and i can use the module with the official rom) modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I found that custom kernels can work with stock ROM's. I'm using stock Google 2.3.6 on my 9023 + pete's kernel with Voodoo sound and BLN. Stable as ****, practically no issues, I'm happy with my NS as never before just because of the lack of constant flashing the **** around to "optimize". It just works flawlessly.
Here's the link to the kernel : http://www.peteralfonso.com/2011/08/download-nexus-s-263514-kernel.html
Had the no wake issue with cm7 216 and nscol 1.4.5. On nscol 1.4.6 and no problems yet. If it happens again it would seem to be a cm7 issue. While annoying devs are constantly hunting down and correcting problems, just the way it is and doesn't bother me.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Jeez loueeeeze
Just use nscollab .46 because that has stock voltages and you should be fine
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
The hole point for me is not using any other kernel but the stock one.. compile yourself a nexus s kernel (google it for how to) and be happy without any reboot, crash..
baterry? normally 1.5 days @ 1.0ghz..
You could do that as well
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Jeez loueeeeze
Just use nscollab .46 because that has stock voltages and you should be fine
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.45 with stock voltages caused the "pin asking" issue even with stock voltages(even with 5.5 cfs - maybe a cyanogen problem?), so that's why i am stuck at .42 with 5.5 cfs and did not even try .46.
Try .46 and lemme know
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Try .46 and lemme know
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you see, in the thread of nscollab, there are also problems with the phone dying etc, even with the new stable cyanogenmod + matr1x kernel.
I only do tests in my mobile during the weekend, because i use it all week for my job. So stuck with matr1x 5.5 until i see a really stable matr1x kernel coming after 8.
madd0g said:
Here's the link to the kernel :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for posting this link. I did not know that kernel. I just found some time to flash nscollab .50 with this kernel and i only changed interactive governor with ondemand to be even closer to stock kernel.
I hope that it is as stable as it is for you.
After some hours with this new kernel, i am not sure about stability(although it seems stable) but nexus is running smoothier than ever.
I've used ondemand from the beginning I started using this kernel, then I tried interactive (default) just to try it out. Not really a difference, same stability/speed and I could get rid of NoFrillsCPU app setting the default governor at startup. So to wrap up, kernel runs beautiful from the start, no extra fiddling necessary.
I do not believe the issues described in the OP are kernel related. They persist in all custom kernels. I think it is from Dalvik VM crash but I have no proof.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=959282&page=309
As I read here I am not alone in the problems described, and after lots and lots of tests i am sure that this is a matr1x specific issue.
So, as i do not have permission to write in a development thread yet, I suggest the following:
1. if the developer of nscollab wants to continue with Matr1x kernels, makes a new release with the last well known stable kernel, which is Matr1x 5.5 until Matr1x developer finds out what is the problem with the new kernels.
2. Matr1x is replaced with another kernel, such as Peter Alfonso's kernel(running FINE for 24 hours. In the same period with Matr1x kernels i would have at least 2-3 problems- 5.5 cfs excluded).
EDIT:
I just got the first "dead phone" issue with alfonso kernel. I should be more patient about stability results of this kernel, or this issue is not kernel related.
After many days of testing with nscollab and different kernels, i am sure that the major problem of "dead phone" is not kernel related but a cyanogenmod issue.
The most stable kernel i tried was Peter Alfonso, but after 4 days of use the issue appeared.
As i need a really stable rom, before going back to stock, i am testing Oxygen 2.3.1, which i do not know yet if it's stable(i hope) but until now is the fastest and smoothest experience.
Id say if you want stability, stay on stock, extra features like BLN and Voodoo sound are added via kernel anyway.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
mikkkg said:
After many days of testing with nscollab and different kernels, i am sure that the major problem of "dead phone" is not kernel related but a cyanogenmod issue.
The most stable kernel i tried was Peter Alfonso, but after 4 days of use the issue appeared.
As i need a really stable rom, before going back to stock, i am testing Oxygen 2.3.1, which i do not know yet if it's stable(i hope) but until now is the fastest and smoothest experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kalimocho found a kernel error and a missing vendor file in the CM kernel. It will be fixed in the next nightly. The hope is that this was the cause of the freezes/reboots/bootloops/dimscreen bootloops that people were seeing.
mikkkg said:
Hello all,
i have been an owner of a nexus s gsm s-lcd since August 2011 and i have been experimenting mostly with cyanogenmod and cyanogenmod based roms such as nscollab.
Using my phone mainly for my jobs, since the beginning of the usage of non official roms, i am always having stability problems ending up not trusting my phone for everyday use.
I have tried cyanogenmod stable, rc, lots of nightly builds and various nscollab versions from 1.0.39.
From my experience so far, except when using matr1x 5.5 cfs i always have some of the following problems, some times some of them and sometimes all of them:
1. reboots
2. reboots with no ability to load the os, with only solution the removal of battery
3. crashes with the result of the pin needed to be given again
4. never waking up after deep sleep
The kernels i have used so far are all the matr1x cfs(sorry, i do not trust con Kolivas and his bfs, being a linux user for 10 years), various netarchy and the stock cyanogenmod .
The only kernel that has been stable for me until now is matr1x 5.5 cfs.
The reason for not going back to the official rom, and be ok with my mobile is mainly the bln and voodoo(although i have bought the paid app and i can use the module with the official rom) modules.
The first thing I though having all these problems is that the main cause of them would be the undervolting that all most of the kernels have. After some tests i realized that with the voltages that proton suggests or even with the stock voltages, the problems do not disappear.
Although, i have found my stable kernel and i always flash matr1x 5.5 cfs in all the roms i use, i would really like to know what is the usual suspect of all these problems. Is there any possibility that some of them are not kernel related and the cause is in the source code of cyanogenmod?
To sum up, i really believe that we should try an effort to create a kernel that is very close to the stock one, and be very careful with the extra modules that we add. Although i do not have the experience of making a kernel package for android, i will try for sure to make a flashable kernel for my needs, and if it's stable i will upload it and share with all of you.
I believe that every mobile has to be bug-free(as possible), and reliable for everyday use and at least i should be reboot-free.
I would really like to read other users experience and opinions.
Regards,
Michael
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this, if it helps you.
Thread here.
mikkkg said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=959282&page=309
As I read here I am not alone in the problems described, and after lots and lots of tests i am sure that this is a matr1x specific issue.
So, as i do not have permission to write in a development thread yet, I suggest the following:
1. if the developer of nscollab wants to continue with Matr1x kernels, makes a new release with the last well known stable kernel, which is Matr1x 5.5 until Matr1x developer finds out what is the problem with the new kernels.
2. Matr1x is replaced with another kernel, such as Peter Alfonso's kernel(running FINE for 24 hours. In the same period with Matr1x kernels i would have at least 2-3 problems- 5.5 cfs excluded).
EDIT:
I just got the first "dead phone" issue with alfonso kernel. I should be more patient about stability results of this kernel, or this issue is not kernel related.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol i keep looking but i dont find anything
ahhhh
This is only for note 7 S7 custom rom port
I am testing it now its been 2hrs not freezing or rebooting. To my conclusion its very stable. Battery seems better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ram121
It will be published here
Changelog for RamKernel V7
1. Source updated to N910FXXS1DQC3
2. Fixes for F2FS
3. LED control
4. msm_hsic_host wake lock reduction fix
5. Control for msm_hsic_host wake lock
6. Support for KernelAdiutor (Thanks to @Pafcholini)
I am uploading builds for all wait
Special Note - If flashing RamKernel_V7 when KernelAdiutor is already installed the cpu cores don't want to turn on and off. So clear data of KernelAdiutor and reboot
Here is the Link for Permissive
For enforcing
Can you all people who tried this please kindly report if its stable. I heard a rumor that its not stable on N910T. I been using it for almost 19hrs. already and I don't have any problem at all. Thank You.
N910t it's freezing after a couple of minutes, test permisive, enforcing freeze at startup, stock rom EQB1
aviathan said:
N910t it's freezing after a couple of minutes, test permisive, enforcing freeze at startup, stock rom EQB1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the response. are using n7 port? this is made only for Note 7 port it won't work on stock.
Sorry i'm on stock i didnt read that was for port, my bad
It will randomly reboot. About 1 or 2 times a day. Ver 5 is more stable.
Sent from my SM-N9200 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
mdiaz33685 said:
It will randomly reboot. About 1 or 2 times a day. Ver 5 is more stable.
Sent from my SM-N9200 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right. When I was Testing it I am using wifi. Its been stable for for almost whole day without freezing or fc. Then, when I put sim card and data was on that's the time my phone become laggy and freeze. That's why I realize its only stable when connected to wifi. I ask Ram121 but until now still waiting for it. I hope version 8 will be stable.
Ram kernel RC1 working great.. tried all data apps running all day, not 1 reboot. now go grab it.
Sent from my SM-N9200 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
mdiaz33685 said:
Ram kernel RC1 working great.. tried all data apps running all day, not 1 reboot. now go grab it.
Sent from my SM-N9200 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup I test it too and its fine and very stable. I need more test. I am in the middle of a new rom right now testing it with Emotion (Emotion-TW-stable-MM-beta-r25-RC7_test) kernel that Lanc City modify it.
Will it work on dr ketan rom of note 7??
Model no:-sm-n910t
7 & 8 are stable the first day or two, but as data accumulates the instability progresses. I noticed regularly cleaning junk files, say every hour can help... a little bit
Hey all. I've spent most my time here on sprint forum because i had unlocked n910p.
Well i recently got a n910t and wanted some experienced opinions on what's the best stable release of Ram kernel for this device?
I see this Op states v7 is good, but since there's been more releases, was wondering if that's changed.
Fyi, i don't need. cutting edge or the bells and whistles like extra governors. Just most stable running cool version? Thanks!
aaron74 said:
Hey all. I've spent most my time here on sprint forum because i had unlocked n910p.
Well i recently got a n910t and wanted some experienced opinions on what's the best stable release of Ram kernel for this device?
I see this Op states v7 is good, but since there's been more releases, was wondering if that's changed.
Fyi, i don't need. cutting edge or the bells and whistles like extra governors. Just most stable running cool version? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you going to use N7 port your best bet is Ram kernel v5 is the last stable kernel but RC1 and 2 is the newest beta. Between v5 and RC1 is unstable. For stock rooted rom you cannot go wrong Beastmod kernel .
gmenik6 said:
If you going to use N7 port your best bet is Ram kernel v5 is the last stable kernel but RC1 and 2 is the newest beta. Between v5 and RC1 is unstable. For stock rooted rom you cannot go wrong Beastmod kernel .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, Thanks! Yes, i have beastmode and familiar with freeza, he made sprint kernels to.
And good, I'll try v5. Yes I've tried rc1 and 2, and even though they worked, it seemed like i had heat problems. Also i don't mess with governors so i don't need all the added stuff.
Thanks :good:
I am looking for a good rom/kernal combo. I currently am Stock ROM with Franco Kernal.
Stock rom + simple gx kernel here
KernAl, such a brave decision.
Stock + Boeffla and probably the best
xXx Rom+Boeffla
Stock and EleX
Perfect.
FreedomOS 1.6 with Bluspark #16 kernel :highfive:
tipsy rom with lightning kernel.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A5000 met Tapatalk
Stockv4.5.8+Franco Kernel
Been a long time Franco Kernel user so didn't try anything else as generally didn't feel the need. My main needs are satisfied with a kernel that gets additional battery life, Viper4Android and Substratum theming. After that OOS/Nova Launcher was good enough.
OP5 1: Stock H2OS + Franco kernel on my daily driver
OP5 2: Stock H2OS + ElementalX kernel for testing purposes (was my daily driver kernel)
Next to try is direct comparison between OOS and H2OS and the 2nd phone will be used to play around with roms and kernels and compare to my daily driver setup.
Cidious said:
OP5 1: Stock H2OS + Franco kernel on my daily driver
OP5 2: Stock H2OS + ElementalX kernel for testing purposes (was my daily driver kernel)
Next to try is direct comparison between OOS and H2OS and the 2nd phone will be used to play around with roms and kernels and compare to my daily driver setup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the past when I had the OP3, h2os was way more polished and used to be the base (got updates early) for OOS. However, now both seem to be at the same page and the h2os build is always updated post the OOS build. How has been your experience with h2os?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
For you, what is the best Kernel for Battery ? I'm using stock OOS and Lightning Kernel.
If H2OS is good I may try it
FreedomOS 1.6 + ElementalX-kernel
maybe i will try Bluspark soon. Loved it on my OP3
Just got my OP5 in the mail today, will be unboxing it tonight! I'm planning on either flashing RR with Lightning Kernel, or the unofficial RR since it has lightning built in, as well as a few other mods (like YouTube AdBlock/Background playback)
I used H2OS from the start since I bought both the phones (8GB versions) ridiculously cheap for just 3500 RMB (€450) in China. Removed some of the Chinese apps. But most of them I actually use since I am actually living here. The H2OS versions were not haunted by most of the early issues I read on the international forum.. I didn't have wifi or Bluetooth issues.. also didn't have weird battery drains. So after trying OOS for 2 days I went back to H2OS which I found to be slightly better on the battery.
Right now I use my OP5 1 with H2OS and Franco kernel as my daily driver and the OP5 2 I experiment with with other roms and kernels until I find something that is worth making my daily driver software.
furious.builder said:
For you, what is the best Kernel for Battery ? I'm using stock OOS and Lightning Kernel.
If H2OS is good I may try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lightning v7 is great on battery. Just tweak it a little bit for your usage and you may get even better results. Boeffla is also equivalent good for battery. Blu_spark and ElementalX are more biased towards balanced profile.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
gillboyzz said:
Stock + Boeffla and probably the best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, works awesome in terms of smoothness and battery life.
Here
oxygen
Stock rom and stock kernel
I don't think I'm allowed to mention the name of the rom I'm using on xda...but yea. That's the one I'm using and it's ok so far, a couple of days. Just clean flashed the latest official....and so far so good on that too
Best kernel for LOS OnePlus 5?
Battery/Performance
It's not about the Kernel, it's how you set it up.
Try boeffla kernel, very great battery and performance
stock kernal
stock kernel but i would like to change to the best, how is franco kernel guys?
Maaalx said:
stock kernel but i would like to change to the best, how is franco kernel guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think franco released a Lineage kernel yet.
olujnap316 said:
Try boeffla kernel, very great battery and performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But boeffla is only for stock, no?
Bluespark
Enviado desde mi Oneplus 5 mediante Tapatalk
andrejd1 said:
But boeffla is only for stock, no?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far yes.
I'm pretty sure he is waiting for an official Lineage build to act as a base for his Lineage kernel.
With LOS from what I have experienced on my oneplus 5T it depends on the revision... I am running AICP based some on LOS and with firmware 5.1. The simpler kernels seemed to be better performers overall. Alot of old kernel stuff we used to do in low ram slow processor days doesnt make as much of a difference that I could see. Overclocking , meh underclocking I read setting the big cluster or gold cluster to 1958 max helps. not sure I noticed alot of difference. No reason to mess with voltage,
All the ones I tried NONE affected audio volume at all even though most have options for it.
Flash kernel works fine seemed to boot fast, no reboots issues. Same version has worked on the last months of changes , has noop,deadline, cfq,bfq, and maple)
Franken worked fine also, I/O has noop, deadline,cfq,bfq,
EX Flar2's worked also (though the version the app gets you dont see on his download page) has a few more features (i.e. more choices in governors , I/O options)
Madys and singularity booted but had different issues. one had stuttering on the sound the other alot of pauses. Alot of options. Long boot time also compared to above mentioned ones.
Blu_spark didnt boot on my latest nightly. And I used his custom R11 version (newest I saw on his download page on XDA) Really want to try it out but didnt boot. Will play more with that and try again later.
---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:54 PM ----------
Also, EX kernel manager, KA-Mod reborn, and kernel manager for Franco Kernel all worked on all of them,
KA-Mod lets you rename your device in the app (that you can do elsewhere in the rom also, ) so your phone shows up on bluetooth with a unique custom name.
Franco Kernel Manager has per app profiles, light color shift for night etc, and ALOT of tweaks and even a page to suggest other apps to improve batter life. I paid for Franco and that is what I am sticking with. If you run Franco's kernel it will update and flash it for you
EX kernel manager also will update and flash their kernel.
We have another post for ROM. Why do we not have another post for Kernel ?
As we can see, we have more than 5 kernels that are from XDA developer or someone else. But which one is really good for your ROM and which one still keep updating ?
I have been using OP5T for 2 months. Have used so many kernels but i still got stuck in those and do not know which is more stable. I am planning to use the kernel from Blu_Spark. Is that good ?
Post your favourite kernel and tell everybody why you use that. It will help newbie to pick what they want.
I am using Flash kernel at the moment but I have already tried Blu, franko, arter, ElementalX etc, but honestly for me it's difficult to see any difference since this phone have already a great battery life and great speed. On my previous phone (S8) the custom kernel gives a big advantage since the phone have tons of bloat and and isn't running stock like Android.
vvt4994 said:
We have another post for ROM. Why do we not have another post for Kernel ?
As we can see, we have more than 5 kernels that are from XDA developer or someone else. But which one is really good for your ROM and which one still keep updating ?
I have been using OP5T for 2 months. Have used so many kernels but i still got stuck in those and do not know which is more stable. I am planning to use the kernel from Blu_Spark. Is that good ?
Post your favourite kernel and tell everybody why you use that. It will help newbie to pick what they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried Blu and Franco for now and both have been very good. I really think kernel performance depends on the combo with the ROM as well as your device. I'm on Liquid Remix with Franco currently but I may give Resurrection Remix a try with Flash. If I had more time, I'd flash every ROM with every kernel to get a feel for all the possibilities LOL. :good:
For me Franco and flash kernel are the Best.... Now with ob3 with Franco kernel
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5010 mediante Tapatalk
Did the Franco improve battery or performance? Someone Tried the Boeffla?
At the moment, both Flash Kernel and RenderKernel are great options in my opinion. I have tried most of the other kernels on xda and if you are looking specifically for smoothness/speed, these are the two you should test first. I do not run battery cycles; everyones daily use scenario really differs too much.
Flash Kernel currently has some kernel features I need (Kcal support & wakelock blocker) while RenderKernel does not have these features quite yet. While it lacks in some features, RenderKernel is undoubtedly the smoothest kernel for 5T right now.
I am on a 5T with OOS 5.0.3.
I like Franco but recently some custom ROMs have WIFI cannot turn on problem after I flash Franco kernel.
:fingers-crossed:
(Don't blame any devs here just sharing.)
crashazz33 said:
At the moment, both Flash Kernel and RenderKernel are great options in my opinion. I have tried most of the other kernels on xda and if you are looking specifically for smoothness/speed, these are the two you should test first. I do not run battery cycles; everyones daily use scenario really differs too much.
Flash Kernel currently has some kernel features I need (Kcal support & wakelock blocker) while RenderKernel does not have these features quite yet. While it lacks in some features, RenderKernel is undoubtedly the smoothest kernel for 5T right now.
I am on a 5T with OOS 5.0.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I download flash kernel?
mo123456789 said:
Where can I download flash kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-5t/development/op5t-flash-kernel-v2-15-1-t3729330/page34
I haven't really played around with Kernel choices much.
I use and appreciate the professionalism of ElementalX kernel.
With it's options to adjust for extreme brightness, it quickly became a favorite a couple years ago and I've just stuck with it since.
Now most devs are adding high brightness to their kernels.
I guess I can start checking other kernels out.
I do like that ElementalX stays very stockish, reliable.
I can pretty much flash it and feel confident nothing weird will pop up over the next few days.
CZ Eddie said:
I haven't really played around with Kernel choices much.
I use and appreciate the professionalism of ElementalX kernel.
With it's options to adjust for extreme brightness, it quickly became a favorite a couple years ago and I've just stuck with it since.
Now most devs are adding high brightness to their kernels.
I guess I can start checking other kernels out.
I do like that ElementalX stays very stockish, reliable.
I can pretty much flash it and feel confident nothing weird will pop up over the next few days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ElementalX, Franco, and flash were all my go-to kernels back in the 6p days (just a few months ago, lol), so it's hard to pick, especially since they all ended up on the 5t. Right now I'm on exkernel though I am partial to flash. Battery life is amazing on all 3, but the overclock on ex just adds that extra bit of smoothness that I've never experienced before. Call it placebo but I just love this kernel (exkernel).
any more input?
im curious to know if fsync affects battery performance at all, can someone also test this out if you are on a kernel that enables disabling the fsync feature
virtyx said:
any more input?
im curious to know if fsync affects battery performance at all, can someone also test this out if you are on a kernel that enables disabling the fsync feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried it but didn't notice any difference.
Technically it should improve performance when using the phone, but it won't be noticeable.
boeffla
simple and steady, close to stock for daily using.
blu_spark, always on the Fastlane. ?
Does flashing a custom kernel solves Google play services battery drain?
Do I need custom recovery and root to flash a custom kernel? I'm not willing to play with kernel adiutor so I'm not really interested in rooting
luws said:
Does flashing a custom kernel solves Google play services battery drain?
Do I need custom recovery and root to flash a custom kernel? I'm not willing to play with kernel adiutor so I'm not really interested in rooting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernel has nothing to do with google play services. You need custom recovery to flash a kernel, but most kernels for op5t are "flash & forget" which mean there is no reason to change the setting of the kernel.
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
vagkoun83 said:
Custom kernel has nothing to do with google play services. You need custom recovery to flash a kernel, but most kernels for op5t are "flash & forget" which mean there is no reason to change the setting of the kernel.
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe not Google play services specifically, but with my latest phone (zuk z2), kernel was directly related to deep sleep
stock OOS/kernel has a serious issue with Google PS in terms of deep sleep. Besides that, I dont feel any need to flash a custom kernel. SOT is incredible already, and performance is really fluid.
luws said:
maybe not Google play services specifically, but with my latest phone (zuk z2), kernel was directly related to deep sleep
stock OOS/kernel has a serious issue with Google PS in terms of deep sleep. Besides that, I dont feel any need to flash a custom kernel. SOT is incredible already, and performance is really fluid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are OK then there is no need to flash a kernel. If an app is crap (like Google services or facebook) the kernel can't do miracles and its not kernels job to control wakelocks of user apps
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
I keep changing between blu and new kernel
Not sure which to stick with but I think new kernel gives me a bit more battery