some of you may know me from the op2 and opx general section where i try to get the password of the l2 support files. well, the official cm l2 support file for the opo is here
https://s3.amazonaws.com/oneplussupport/DLT-CM.rar
i'm looking for someone with a fast computer (something like a xeon worstation with 32 cpu cores and 64 cpu threads) to crack the password
if you don't have the password to the file but you have the contents of the file, upload to google drive/androidfilehost only. do not upload to any other site
faq
isn't it illegal to crack the password ?
originally said by a moderator who now tells me that he never said this,
"oneplus cannot legally give you the files without getting into trouble. if you crack the password and release it on some other site, they don't have coverage. if they give you the password, they do"
paultje162 cracked the password and released the file. i don't see oneplus taking any action against him
more coming soon !
Mirrors :- http://www.mediafire.com/download/f7bi0roc4knl73q/DLT-CM.rar
More coming soon !
What does this contain?
Out of curiosity, how much time would it take to crack the password on a quad core processor? And shouldn't the person also be knowledgeable about cracking passwords n all?
U can also use some dedicated GPU's to bruteforce that. They are fasten then a cpu.
abhibnl said:
Out of curiosity, how much time would it take to crack the password on a quad core processor? And shouldn't the person also be knowledgeable about cracking passwords n all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would take millions of years. I have similar files for the op2 and the opx and you require a xeon with 4 gpus to crack it
The password for op2_o2_mp8.rar is 40 characters long with letters, numbers and symbols (no spaces though)
PS :- this file is a oneplus factory image for the opo (this one contains cm ). In a similar way, op2_o2_mp8.rar is a factory image for the op2 (this one contains oxygen)
Traace said:
U can also use some dedicated GPU's to bruteforce that. They are fasten then a cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we have this file, unbrick will be very easy. You won't have to go to coloros and then back to stock.
Also, this one comes directly from oneplus so it is guaranteed to fix your phone
fards said:
What does this contain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official cm image from oneplus
It can be used even if the fastboot (bootloader) partition has problems
There is an oxygenos one as well but I don't think anybody wants oxygen here, now do they ? Oxygenos is not really good. I have the op2 and it's a bit buggy
I originally started it for the device I have (op2). Later on, I went for the opx (I don't have one but I have the recovery files now) and now, it's opo turn
[email protected] said:
Official cm image from oneplus
It can be used even if the fastboot (bootloader) partition has problems
There is an oxygenos one as well but I don't think anybody wants oxygen here, now do they ? Oxygenos is not really good. I have the op2 and it's a bit buggy
I originally started it for the device I have (op2). Later on, I went for the opx (I don't have one but I have the recovery files now) and now, it's opo turn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It unbricks with Qualcomm hs USB mode.
This is NOT the only file you need to unbrick your opo, you need official oneplus drivers as well
The password for that driver package is known but I don't want to give passwords around so you can download an unencrypted version from http://www.mediafire.com/download/g7pmb1mtim0cdxe/oneplus_drivers.exe
BTW, if anyone wants to try to sign the drivers (because oneplus was too lazy to get them digitally signed, then they are free to do so at their own risk), then please tell me and I'll guide you through the process
Disable driver signature enforcement and also your antivirus before you install the drivers. Certain av's like to freak out when unsigned drivers are placed inside self-extracting archives. (Windows defender in windows 8.1 and above need not be disabled)
@paultje162 can you help ?
I'm going to try the password for op2_o2_mp8.rar on this file and I'll tell you of it works
It depends of how many letters are used and does it have special characters. If it's about six letters you can crack it in few hours or even minutes with well prepared environment. For example Linux based pc with i7 core and NVidia graphic with cuda libs. Gpu's are better for cracking. But if it's 12-15 different letters and chars... Maby rainbow tables?
---------- Post added at 11:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 AM ----------
Challenge accepted ?
DooshPastesh said:
It depends of how many letters are used and does it have special characters. If it's about six letters you can crack it in few hours or even minutes with well prepared environment. For example Linux based pc with i7 core and NVidia graphic with cuda libs. Gpu's are better for cracking. But if it's 12-15 different letters and chars... Maby rainbow tables?
---------- Post added at 11:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 AM ----------
Challenge accepted ��
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's more than 35 characters
I have files for the op2 and opx with their password and I know how long and difficult the password can be
The password for op2_o2_mp8.rar was something like this (this is not the real password)
$9>?.!YcR?J%_Wu5\mA&tzXw.WTcH$CN
So the password for dlt-cm.rar will be difficult to find as well
Just for kicks.
Created directory: /home/tristan202/.john
Loaded 1 password hash (RAR3 SHA-1 AES [32/64])
MinLen = 35 exceeds the maximum possible length for the current hash type (16)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried it with MinLen = 35, MaxLen = 40, but got the above error.
Good news is, that the password is not that long, bad news is that it will still take a loooong time to crack.
Yup, if it is that long, so i have to give up. My machine is too weak for that. I'm using it for other tasks daily. Maybe at weekend I'll try setup crark. Fingers crossed.
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
I've sent PMs to @paultje162 . I don't know why he hasn't replied yet
[email protected] said:
faq
isn't it illegal to crack the password ?
originally said by dsmonteiro, a moderator on the oneplus forums
"oneplus cannot legally give you the files without getting into trouble. if you crack the password and release it on some other site, they don't have coverage. if they give you the password, they do"
more coming soon !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see how that quote answers that question. I didn't say anything about cracking passwords being legal or not so please don't use my words to say what you want.
I'm fairly certain that password cracking is illegal, since you are obtaining access to something that is not rightfully yours.
- dsmonteiro
mrguna said:
I don't see how that quote answers that question. I didn't say anything about cracking passwords being legal or not so please don't use my words to say what you want.
I'm fairly certain that password cracking is illegal, since you are obtaining access to something that is not rightfully yours.
- dsmonteiro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And would you please clarify why there is a password in the first place ?
And this is cm, the source of the rom is available. There is no need to put a password on it
[email protected] said:
And would you please clarify why there is a password in the first place ?
And this is cm, the source of the rom is available. There is no need to put a password on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I made you aware before, I do not work for OnePlus so I don't know why you're asking me this. And no, the source is not available, there are many closed source parts that are not available.
Related
I received an onlive microconsole free from PAX solely for the reason of hacking (as did about 5000 others). My primary goal is to be able to put Google TV on it as it has very similar specs to some existing set top boxes. (Nixeus fusion xs, which also has sources available)
The source code for the consoles OS can be found here
http://opensource.onlive.com/
I poked around inside the zips and certainly contains all the drivers for generic linux. The interesting thing is they included the SoCs build folder giving instructions for android.
The kicker is, I have no idea how to build an OS from source and modify it nor do I know about getting it on to the machine. I took it apart and it has a block of 12 pins, which I presume are for nand reading and writing. I've glitched /jtagged a few 360s so I am familiar with the process of nand modifications, I just have no clue how to find out which pins to use on this board. The microconsole is keyboard and mouse compatible but I have not found a way to enter a terminal or bootloader.
The easiest thing to do is look for serial ports because with a serial connection you can most of the flash fw and stuff...
would help if you'd post some specs and pics
Reversedhex said:
The easiest thing to do is look for serial ports because with a serial connection you can most of the flash fw and stuff...
would help if you'd post some specs and pics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any news? I'am have one microconsole and can post here photo's. I'am found 3pin area but it's not a jtag perhaps.
suddo said:
any news? I'am have one microconsole and can post here photo's. I'am found 3pin area but it's not a jtag perhaps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
additional pictures
Update?
suddo said:
additional pictures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has any progress been made on this?
Anyone ?
Any news to microconsole "hacking"?
Are there any ways to get toolchain to build OS sources?
Especially regarding to OnLive soon closure
Toshik23 said:
Any news to microconsole "hacking"?
Are there any ways to get toolchain to build OS sources?
Especially regarding to OnLive soon closure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got a HW engr. friend working on it ... Even just to get Shell
I DL the FULL open source proj. and I'd suggest you do the same before they take it down
opensource.onlive.com
Toshik23 said:
Any news to microconsole "hacking"?
Are there any ways to get toolchain to build OS sources?
Especially regarding to OnLive soon closure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahze85283 said:
I've got a HW engr. friend working on it ... Even just to get Shell
I DL the FULL open source proj. and I'd suggest you do the same before they take it down
opensource.onlive.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahze85283 said:
I've got a HW engr. friend working on it ... Even just to get Shell
I DL the FULL open source proj. and I'd suggest you do the same before they take it down
opensource.onlive.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
upload this sdk to googledrive pls.
Try this nixeus.com/?p=171 .
Im also quite interested in what can become of this. Hell even drivers that would make the console version of the the controller work on a pc would be something.
GitHub
not My Github but I did Run across this
https// github.com/ samdmarshall/ Onlive-Source-Backup
better than any Google Drive Link I can Give
Still waiting on a few HW Tools from China [Needed a New UART adapter amount others]
I'll Keep you Updated ...
ahze85283 said:
not My Github but I did Run across this
https// github.com/ samdmarshall/ Onlive-Source-Backup
better than any Google Drive Link I can Give
Still waiting on a few HW Tools from China [Needed a New UART adapter amount others]
I'll Keep you Updated ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything New man i really wanna find a use for this microconsole i dont like throwing Tech away
Has any more progress been made on this? I loved the OL service in it's prime and it'd be a shame to throw the microconsole away if there's any legitimate use for it.
I'm still digging to the code to verify what I can do with it but with 3 uart adapters not arriving I'm kind of at an impasse. I'm not done yet though I even bought an extra one off of ebay for $17 as an extra hardware in case I fry 1
+1 in hoping someone manages to get some other software running on it. would love to repurpose it as a Steam/shield streaming box
fingers crossed.
not enough people interested i guess, i mean it's no more than a thin client if im correct. either way if kodi + steamos could be installed great
So interseted in OnLive
keep the good work
i am also digging into the codes and have experience in GL low-level programming and high level
would be happy to share
snowwhiteln13 said:
keep the good work
i am also digging into the codes and have experience in GL low-level programming and high level
would be happy to share
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure i'd love some help ... without a uart i cant figure out the trigger for sw/fw upgrade. I think i've got a passable image for an os ... in source. I don't know formt required.
Direct message me i'll connect on hangout or something
ahze85283 said:
Sure i'd love some help ... without a uart i cant figure out the trigger for sw/fw upgrade. I think i've got a passable image for an os ... in source. I don't know formt required.
Direct message me i'll connect on hangout or something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i had direct message you
Me and a few friends of mine are waiting to use microconsole again. It has super gamepad. It has built in DVR button and playback buttons that has many potential to use it on pc or via micro console.
Please keep us updating.
Hey guys, just installed the Pro version of Windows 8 RTM buiild 9200... here's some pics:
http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/811/storezc.png
http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/256/80809567.png
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/6571/informations.png
Sorry, no links allowed here
Dude take down that link before someone reports you or a moderator finds it, that's not allowed here. The screenshots are fine though I think.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app
Removed download link, as it's no different to any other warez.
I told him!
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app
the link to the page I posted before did not contain any link to download or similar.
The download isnt hard to find google is your friend here. The trick is having a key otherwise you are stuck with evaluation mode. I fortunatly have a key from VLSC so happy days
Im not 100% convinced though these builds are not messed with so be careful with personal info/passwords etc I have had a few odd moments. Thats said its a great way to play till the 15th.
In my expiriance MS dont seem to mind what you uised to install so long as you have a lisence or at least that is how our audit went. ie you have 160 installs of windows do you have 160 keys either vlsc, paper, or stuck to the pc as a sticker. That said anyone hacking it i think is in a diff boat and i tend to agree with the line that piracy is theft and theft is not moral i dont care about legal lol (its not legal to stab a rapist in the face but i would have no issue someone doing it).
I have seen in another thread that surely hacking is the backbone of this site but, its one thing to take a product you have bought and make it better then to steal one altogether.
Using WinMD5Sum, here are the checksum values from the ISO's directly from Microsoft:
http://www.winmd5.com/?rid=winmd5
Windows_8_Pro_EN-US_x64.ISO
7a10316a79a543f2bf4953a4332b4323
Windows_8_Pro_EN-US_x86.ISO
99c94934e53b4e28e955d4fcb06caaa8
Hopes this helps put some people at ease.
(May or may not be the right place to put this)
A place to discuss and attempt to implement Android app compatibility for Sailfish OS.
Now I'm not too knowledgeable about this kind of stuff, I'll need to do more research before I'll be able to help in any meaningful way.
vgrade said:
From a community standpoint I'd much prefer an open solution.
The way the Sailfish stack is designed it leads itself more to an open solution than previous attempts. It uses the android driver libs from original /system , runs an init just as in real android. For example surface flinger would run if you enabled it from init.rc. We can run the original dalvik. So all (and I know its a significant task) that is required is some plumbing to allow switching of surface flinger output to hwcomposer instead of lipstick (the sailfish compositor) and switching touch.
I'd invite anyone interested to join us at sailfishos-porters to discuss further
BR
vgrade
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UPDATE 1:
I have been working on this lately, and can "boot" into CM11 and get to the setup screen, but the touchscreen, power button and potentially everything else doesn't work as it's still using the sailfish drivers. The only command needed to boot into CM11 is just starting surfaceflinger via "./surfaceflinger" after navigating to /system/bin/ . I did however modify the init.rc file to turn on the android specific services. which I've linked below.
UPDATE 2: using ssh via USB connection breaks when "booting" into CM but using ssh over WiFi does not.
Modified init.rc file
UPDATE 3: Quicksilver is a chromium client for sailfish, and if you build it with NaCl enabled (its currently disabled) then ARChon MAY work. The link to the git repo is below.
quicksilver repo link
UPDATE 4: It's getting close now. Chroot-ing into the android emulator image while also using it's renderer is almost seeing the light of day and we need your help. All info found in this thread.
Some extra posts for context...
The following post is what inspired the vgrade's post (see post 1 of this thread):
kageurufu said:
and Alien is ported over (I know it wont be official, someones gonna do it anyway) this could easily be a daily driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes you so sure of that, AlienDalvik's a proprietary solution, it's not an easy undertaking, IcedRobot really struggled to get anywhere.
I followed it & related/similar for years, but none of them got anywhere really...*
Jolla should be offering AD as a paid add-on via the store, not expecting the community to whisk a decent alternative into reality from thin air.
---------- Post added at 02:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:24 PM ----------
vgrade said:
An open dalvik would be a huge step forwards and any help people can give please drop into #sailfishos-porters IRC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely a much better "step forward" would be to offer AD as a paid for add-on via the store...
Maybe longer-term you/we can aim for an open dalvik, but there's already too much you're/we're juggling over the next ~12mth.
*google IcedRobot & IcedRobot Dalvik, but here's 3 quick/dirty links:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam...do=get&target=icedrobot-fosdem-2011-02-05.pdf
https://github.com/icedrobot
https://twitter.com/hashtag/icedrobot
The old project site doesn't even exist any more, just some junk fitness product:
http://www.icedrobot.org/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The next 2 posts below came after vrgrade's response (see post 1 of this thread):
jalyst said:
@vgrade
Interesting, I thought what would be required, is something akin to icedrobot i.e. a complete (openJDK compliant) replacement of dalvik.
Are you saying that something much simpler would be possible (& hence much less work), & would still work just as well?
Sorry for the OT post, last one, perhaps a sep. thread needs to be created here...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vgrade said:
Yes , something much simpler.
Please feel free to start a new thread , its there a general area on xda as this would be common to all Sailfish ports, N4, N5 , N7 , Galaxy Nexus etc
vgrade
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice thread. I have not much knowledge about such things here but just to say it BlackBerry OS 10 has also support for Android apps and maybe someone could get done kind of inspiration off their implementation of Android. Just a thought of mine maybe it's completely nonsense what I said but maybe not so.
http://wiki.maemo.org/Apkenv
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=87496
Have a look in here., trying to make sense of it myself.
You'd prolly want to get folks like: Mario Torre (IcedRobot), Carstun Munk (libhybris), Thomas Perl (apkenv) involved in one way or another.
Plus some Android guys who are well respected in this community, & who know dalvik/art inside out...
aironeous said:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Apkenv
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=87496
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://openrepos.net/content/lightdot/apkenv
Yeah but, apkenv is far from being a solution, we need some of the relevant parties engaging here, not end-users.
ARC - App Runtime for Chrome OS, is promising, if anyone knows how to port it over . I can't find any source files, other than ARChon. Could it be this.
nh1402 said:
ARC - App Runtime for Chrome OS, is promising, if anyone knows how to port it over . I can't find any source files, other than ARChon. Could it be this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://chromium.googlesource.com/a...410.206.0/docs/getting-started-open-source.md
A small set of shared objects can be built which are part of ARC currently.
A fully running system cannot currently be built.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EnErGy[CSDX] said:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/a...410.206.0/docs/getting-started-open-source.md
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take it Archon works as it works through Chrome, which has similar stuff to Chrome OS.
EDIT: I mean theoretically you could install all the relevant repos to install chromium and then get archon working that way.
nh1402 said:
I take it Archon works as it works through Chrome, which has similar stuff to Chrome OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Archon is just repack of ARC extensition to make it work under desktop Chrome.
nh1402 said:
EDIT: I mean theoretically you could install all the relevant repos to install chromium and then get archon working that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
installing chromuim to Sailfish os is no trivial task.
I was just stating theoretically speaking. I wasn't suggesting someone should do that, I understand that its not a trivial task. I guess we should wait till they release all the necessary files then, unless they don't plan to then we're back to square one.
I thought I would try and see what happens if I pause lipstick (kill -STOP 950) , and start surfaceflinger (./system/bin/surfaceflinger), and see what happens, turns out it shows that "static-y" image like when you're booting into sailfish.but since sailfish doesn't use surfaceflinger then nothing happens it just stays with that same screen. stop surfaceflinger, and then run (kill -CONT 950), and then start interacting with the screen again, everything goes back to normal.
If I can find out the bare minimum needed to install and run an apk, it could work, but probably won't.
If someone knows what services are needed in order to either boot into android, or to get an app to run, please say so.
EDIT: I can now get to the setup screen of cyanogenmod, but that is it, touchscreen doesn't work and ssh connection breaks. But its recognised as an unauthorised device in adb.
And how about https://github.com/vladikoff/chromeos-apk/ ?
sledges said:
And how about https://github.com/vladikoff/chromeos-apk/ ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That works through Chrome/Chromium.
nh1402 said:
That works through Chrome/Chromium.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chrome OS is a GNU/Linux distro, so would need crosscompiling to ARM and integration effort
sledges said:
Chrome OS is a GNU/Linux distro, so would need crosscompiling to ARM and integration effort
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checking the source code documentation still reads "A small set of shared objects can be built which are part of ARC currently. A fully running system cannot currently be built." They could provide an update and release the shared objects at Google I/O later this year but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Is Gentroid worth looking into? https://code.google.com/p/gentroid/
aironeous said:
Is Gentroid worth looking into? https://code.google.com/p/gentroid/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice find, I would say that it is.
Now there are 3 promising Android solutions
CM (if we can get touch working)
gentroid
quicksilver (if ARChon works on Chromium)
http://www.reddit.com/r/nexus6/comments/2m49w1/the_encryption_issue/
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/2m49qd/psa_android_5x_encryption_cannot_be_disabled_if/
This is super disappointing.
i'm hoping (and confident) that custom kernels will be able to disable this.
vivanshah said:
i'm hoping (and confident) that custom kernels will be able to disable this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Otherwise a fresh ROM image would do it.
Skripka said:
Otherwise a fresh ROM image would do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On what basis do you say that (honest question)?
Google says
Caution: Devices upgraded to Android 5.0 and then encrypted may be returned to an unencrypted state by factory data reset. New Android 5.0 devices encrypted at first boot cannot be returned to an unencrypted state.
mk262 said:
On what basis do you say that (honest question)?
Google says
Caution: Devices upgraded to Android 5.0 and then encrypted may be returned to an unencrypted state by factory data reset. New Android 5.0 devices encrypted at first boot cannot be returned to an unencrypted state.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then... Bye bye Nexus 6....
mk262 said:
This is super disappointing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it is less disappointing than the file system just being slow for no reason.
hitzand said:
Well, it is less disappointing than the file system just being slow for no reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnandTech is of the opinion that the AndroBench tools are not yet functioning properly on Lollipop. It was the AndroBench toolset that Ars used to cook up their NAND comparison.
Once developers get their hands on it, they will figure out how to disable encryption. They could possibly use a hard flash method which replaces entire sectors of the NAND with new data. Simply flashing a ROM/kernel probably won't be enough.
Skripka said:
AnandTech is of the opinion that the AndroBench tools are not yet functioning properly on Lollipop. It was the AndroBench toolset that Ars used to cook up their NAND comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you read that?
mk262 said:
Where did you read that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ars's review openly labels the ssd benches as being androbench. Anand openly comments in their review that they think the numbers from Nexus 6 are so bad and weird that they cannot be correct...and therefore Anand doesn't include ssd benches in their review
Skripka said:
Ars's review openly labels the ssd benches as being androbench. Anand openly comments in their review that they think the numbers from Nexus 6 are so bad and weird that they cannot be correct...and therefore Anand doesn't include ssd benches in their review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.anandtech.com/comments/8687/the-nexus-6-review/429491
that's interesting
Skripka said:
AnandTech is of the opinion that the AndroBench tools are not yet functioning properly on Lollipop. It was the AndroBench toolset that Ars used to cook up their NAND comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks don't matter. Are found in normal use the phone is slower than a N5, which is what a normal user will experience. That's what's so bad.
Also, encryption has nothing to do with this. You can enable encryption on Windows and it barely slows down disk access, if you have a modern cpu. The Nexus 6 chipset is plenty fast, so the slowdown is due to flash memory not being fast enough.
ECrispy said:
Benchmarks don't matter. Are found in normal use the phone is slower than a N5, which is what a normal user will experience. That's what's so bad.
Also, encryption has nothing to do with this. You can enable encryption on Windows and it barely slows down disk access, if you have a modern cpu. The Nexus 6 chipset is plenty fast, so the slowdown is due to flash memory not being fast enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Face palm...your modern desktop CPU has dedicated encryption instructions.
Skripka said:
Face palm...your modern desktop CPU has dedicated encryption instructions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if the 805 has AES support, I know ARM v8 does. Regardless, since its enabled by default in L, it will hurt users.
ECrispy said:
Benchmarks don't matter. Are found in normal use the phone is slower than a N5, which is what a normal user will experience. That's what's so bad.
Also, encryption has nothing to do with this. You can enable encryption on Windows and it barely slows down disk access, if you have a modern cpu. The Nexus 6 chipset is plenty fast, so the slowdown is due to flash memory not being fast enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong
ECrispy said:
I'm not sure if the 805 has AES support, I know ARM v8 does. Regardless, since its enabled by default in L, it will hurt users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ARM v8 does.
805 is v7 and does not.
In which case encrypting everything by default is a bad decision. No one wants a phone slower than a N5. Did Ars get a bad unit? They are highly respected.
mk262 said:
On what basis do you say that (honest question)?
Google says
Caution: Devices upgraded to Android 5.0 and then encrypted may be returned to an unencrypted state by factory data reset. New Android 5.0 devices encrypted at first boot cannot be returned to an unencrypted state.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible to unencrypt things before first boot? That line has me a lil confused...
kinfolk248 said:
Is it possible to unencrypt things before first boot? That line has me a lil confused...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just a software flag that tells the firstboot process to encrypt the phone. It is described here: https://source.android.com/devices/tech/encryption/
*** quite trivial to disable.
More: Its just a parameter in the fstab, which is a plain text file that describes to vold, what to mount where. Changing the flag from forceencrypt to encryptable fixes it. Note that this file is in the root fs, which means that the boot image needs to be unpacked and repacked to modify it.
More2: They're doing it on Nexus 9, with apparently very positive results.... http://forum.xda-developers.com/nex...llipopalooza-flounder-volantis-t2933831/page2
doitright said:
Its just a software flag that tells the firstboot process to encrypt the phone. It is described here: https://source.android.com/devices/tech/encryption/
*** quite trivial to disable.
More: Its just a parameter in the fstab, which is a plain text file that describes to vold, what to mount where. Changing the flag from forceencrypt to encryptable fixes it. Note that this file is in the root fs, which means that the boot image needs to be unpacked and repacked to modify it.
More2: They're doing it on Nexus 9, with apparently very positive results.... http://forum.xda-developers.com/nex...llipopalooza-flounder-volantis-t2933831/page2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smh I need the hots wings and beer translation of that lol
What is the current state of rooting and custom ROMs for the LTE variant (full code of model sold in my home country: SM-T725NZKADBT)?
I saw some threads like https://forum.xda-developers.com/tab-s5e/help/root-samsung-galaxy-tab-s5e-sm-t725-t3926742 but they are old (but Samsung is releasing updates regularly) or closed or mix it up with the non-LTE device.
When will people learn that you don't buy an LTE late model tablet if you want to root and install custom ROMs. If I have seen this question once "Will this ROM work on my LTE tablet?", I've seen it a hundred times. And the answer is ALWAYS NO. I would think that 99% of the people who buy a tablet in the price range of the T720, also have a smartphone. So why do you need LTE in the tablet? Personally, before buying ANY tablet, I check the XDA forums to see what kind of custom ROMs are available.
lewmur said:
When will people learn that you don't buy an LTE late model tablet if you want to root and install custom ROMs. If I have seen this question once "Will this ROM work on my LTE tablet?", I've seen it a hundred times. And the answer is ALWAYS NO. I would think that 99% of the people who buy a tablet in the price range of the T720, also have a smartphone. So why do you need LTE in the tablet? Personally, before buying ANY tablet, I check the XDA forums to see what kind of custom ROMs are available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people want or need the LTE functionality. I use a tablet for surfing and chatting while commuting (4 hours per work day, in winter sometimes even longer). The trains and busses in my region have no Wifi. Why not getting a smartphone? I'm visually impaired (glasses don't help for my issue) and everthing below 10" is unusuable for me. Additionally, I have some motorical problems and have issues hitting keys on a small virtual keyboard on a smartphone.
PS: I don't have bought it already. I ask before buying
Is there any reason why root or custom ROMs for the LTE variants are so rare?
Wussie1337 said:
Some people want or need the LTE functionality. I use a tablet for surfing and chatting while commuting (4 hours per work day, in winter sometimes even longer). The trains and busses in my region have no Wifi. Why not getting a smartphone? I'm visually impaired (glasses don't help for my issue) and everthing below 10" is unusuable for me. Additionally, I have some motorical problems and have issues hitting keys on a small virtual keyboard on a smartphone.
PS: I don't have bought it already. I ask before buying
Is there any reason why root or custom ROMs for the LTE variants are so rare?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are rare because the devs don't own them. Many devs have attempted to create ROMs for the LTE versions of their wifi only tablets and have given up the idea because they have no way of trouble shooting problems.
As to your "commute", there is a simple solution. Buy a "hotspot" device. Even a cheap smartphone can be used. You don't have to be able to "see" it because it only requires being setup once. Then a wifi only tablet can connect through it when there is no other wifi available.
lewmur said:
When will people learn that you don't buy an LTE late model tablet if you want to root and install custom ROMs. If I have seen this question once "Will this ROM work on my LTE tablet?", I've seen it a hundred times. And the answer is ALWAYS NO. I would think that 99% of the people who buy a tablet in the price range of the T720, also have a smartphone. So why do you need LTE in the tablet? Personally, before buying ANY tablet, I check the XDA forums to see what kind of custom ROMs are available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am in the 1% who use the LTE version and i don't have a smartphone i call and sent messages from the tablet, I root it and i don't care if there custom rom.
lewmur said:
As to your "commute", there is a simple solution. Buy a "hotspot" device. Even a cheap smartphone can be used. You don't have to be able to "see" it because it only requires being setup once. Then a wifi only tablet can connect through it when there is no other wifi available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this tip, but my preference is just having to take care of and charge one device.
lapora said:
I am in the 1% who use the LTE version and i don't have a smartphone i call and sent messages from the tablet, I root it and i don't care if there custom rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, rooting would be me primary wish, too. Basically because of Titanium Backup and kernel tweaking.
Wussie1337 said:
Thanks for this tip, but my preference is just having to take care of and charge one device.
Yes, rooting would be me primary wish, too. Basically because of Titanium Backup and kernel tweaking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To each his own. But for the small inconvience of having to charge two devices, you are ostracizing yourself to the one percent and have to abide by the results. I'm just the oppisite. I had to have Amazon clear out my Kindle Unlimited device list but it had me down for having close to 200. Everytime I'd install a new Android version on one of my devices, Unlimited would log it as a new device.
lewmur said:
To each his own. But for the small inconvience of having to charge two devices, you are ostracizing yourself to the one percent and have to abide by the results. I'm just the oppisite. I had to have Amazon clear out my Kindle Unlimited device list but it had me down for having close to 200. Everytime I'd install a new Android version on one of my devices, Unlimited would log it as a new device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. This is complaining why the dev community is not supporting a very very small percentage of he population who have no phone and only a tablet. The simple answer is as you said, use your phone as a hotspot. If you don't have a phone that's on you SMH
Sent from my SM-T720 using Tapatalk
Hi ,I have flushed the T720 rom(based on lineage-17.1) to T725 successfully, but the wifi model crashes per thirty seconds, today i downloaded the t725 official rom,and i will try to extract the wifi model to build directory. I dont konw if this is the right way, but I will try it.
hugoIsMe said:
Hi ,I have flushed the T720 rom(based on lineage-17.1) to T725 successfully, but the wifi model crashes per thirty seconds, today i downloaded the t725 official rom,and i will try to extract the wifi model to build directory. I dont konw if this is the right way, but I will try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately，it does not work. I built it successfully,and flush it to T725, but the device cannot boot successfully, it's stuck on the startup page “The tablet is not running Samsung's official software....................."
I have no idea now.
Wussie1337 said:
What is the current state of rooting and custom ROMs for the LTE variant (full code of model sold in my home country: SM-T725NZKADBT)?
I saw some threads like https://forum.xda-developers.com/tab-s5e/help/root-samsung-galaxy-tab-s5e-sm-t725-t3926742 but they are old (but Samsung is releasing updates regularly) or closed or mix it up with the non-LTE device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guy, thanks Luk1337 for his help, i have built a rom for samsung t725 successfully, it bases on t720 and lineage-17.1 , I have modified the wifi model (source extracted from samsung official rom) and finally it works on my t725c . I only tested the wifi connection and have not tested the lte model because i have no idle sim card to test.
So if you need it ,you can build it by yourself ,with some special configurations. Or I can share you the rom I built yesterday.
I suggest sharing it for the public as I don't have time nowadays for tests and backups.
But a huge thx for the efforts
Wussie1337 said:
I suggest sharing it for the public as I don't have time nowadays for tests and backups.
But a huge thx for the efforts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but where to upload it? it has a large size with 866 003KB. I can noly use Baidu Cloud Disk now , but seems that not some people use it outside of China .
pls post an available upload address below.
hugoIsMe said:
ok, but where to upload it? it has a large size with 866 003KB. I can noly use Baidu Cloud Disk now , but seems that not some people use it outside of China .
pls post an available upload address below.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The wifi works on your rom ?
hugoIsMe said:
ok, but where to upload it? it has a large size with 866 003KB. I can noly use Baidu Cloud Disk now , but seems that not some people use it outside of China .
pls post an available upload address below.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in telegram messenger you can send files up to 1.3Gig. You can open a channel there
Luk1337 should upload it to hes website like other rom he have there. I have the SM-T725 and i would like to use your lineage os on it. Luk1337 is going to update it regulary like the SM-T720 rom he have.
vicechico said:
The wifi works on your rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes ，the wifi works fine. In some countries, you may need to configure captive-portal, to avoid the wifi connection error prompts.
---------- Post added at 06:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 AM ----------
Quietsch said:
in telegram messenger you can send files up to 1.3Gig. You can open a channel there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to postpone the upload, because I found some mic problems, sometimes the microphone can’t handle voice input correctly， Im trying to fix it.
hugoIsMe said:
yes ，the wifi works fine. In some countries, you may need to configure captive-portal, to avoid the wifi connection error prompts.
---------- Post added at 06:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 AM ----------
I have to postpone the upload, because I found some mic problems, sometimes the microphone can’t handle voice input correctly， Im trying to fix it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry , how to setup captive-portal?
vicechico said:
Sorry , how to setup captive-portal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you connect to a wifi ,google will try to connect to a websit to verify the quality of it. and if you get a prompt "Connected, no internet", it means that you need to config the captive-portal, use the command below:
Code:
adb shell settings put global captive_portal_https_url https://connect.rom.miui.com/generate_204
Note: https://connect.rom.miui.com/generate_204 is working for China area, you should replace it to your own country's server url.
hugoIsMe said:
yes ，the wifi works fine. In some countries, you may need to configure captive-portal, to avoid the wifi connection error prompts.
---------- Post added at 06:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 AM ----------
I have to postpone the upload, because I found some mic problems, sometimes the microphone can’t handle voice input correctly， Im trying to fix it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, have you achieved fixing the error?