in the time where a lot of android users anticipating the OnePlus One successor which is creatively named Two and hyping it up with benchmark scores and spec discussions, I don't see any promotion by the company itself, as with their original device they were promoting it for more than 6 months before it was available, yet the rumors say OnePlus Two would be available in the Third Quarter of 2015 but I didn't see anything official about this device existence yet.
We're already discussing this here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/general/oneplus-rumors-t2961061
CafeKampuchia said:
We're already discussing this here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/general/oneplus-rumors-t2961061
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Thread closed
Related
We heard from a lot of users and moderators on the issue of whether to put all Galaxy S forums under one roof or to offer separate forums for them all.
For the sake of keeping confusion to a minimum plus ensuring that XDA stays as organized as possible, we've officially decided to launch forums for all four variants of the Galaxy S. We expect these four devices (plus the unlocked Galaxy S) to be very popular devices once they're on sale.
Here are the links!
Sprint Epic 4G
AT&T Captivate
T-Mobile Vibrant
Verizon Fascinate
This forum will be for the unlocked European version of the Galaxy S that has been on sale since June.
Thanks to everyone!
Edit by Chainfire:
Please note various Q&A from the i9000 (unlocked European version) FAQ may still be relevant to your device:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=723596
Is there any way for them to be all under the same parent forum on the tree so that we don't get heavy fragmentation in discussions? It would make it easier for people to find threads that were for other Galaxy S derived devices that also affected them, but were posted in the other forums.
ryukent said:
Is there any way for them to be all under the same parent forum on the tree so that we don't get heavy fragmentation in discussions? It would make it easier for people to find threads that were for other Galaxy S derived devices that also affected them, but were posted in the other forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. It will be a pain to trawl through 5 different threads for Themes and Apps for example, which will be the same for all devices.
What was the point in the poll if popular vote didn't matter?
Oh well, I guess I'll just have to look through them all
GG to my laziness
Rawat said:
This. It will be a pain to trawl through 5 different threads for Themes and Apps for example, which will be the same for all devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.
Agreed.
Can we fight with the other Galaxy S varieties for supremacy?
NOOO MY GALAYX IS TEH BESHTESTT!!!1!!1!one!!eleven
Unimaginative said:
Can we fight with the other Galaxy S varieties for supremacy?
NOOO MY GALAYX IS TEH BESHTESTT!!!1!!1!one!!eleven
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obi-Wan: I have to admit that without the SGS varieties, it would have not been a victory.
Yoda: Victory? Victory you say? Master Obi-Wan, not victory. The shroud of the dark side has fallen. Begun the SGS War has.
INeedYourHelp said:
Obi-Wan: I have to admit that without the SGS varieties, it would have not been a victory.
Yoda: Victory? Victory you say? Master Obi-Wan, not victory. The shroud of the dark side has fallen. Begun the SGS War has.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the best post I have ever seen on XDA.
INeedYourHelp said:
What was the point in the poll if popular vote didn't matter?
Oh well, I guess I'll just have to look through them all
GG to my laziness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/Twerd.
No point in separating everything....
-bZj
I liked the idea of different development forums And keeping everything else unified. I don't remember any of htc wm phones being separated by carrier. Why separate all of the galaxies?
Rawat said:
This. It will be a pain to trawl through 5 different threads for Themes and Apps for example, which will be the same for all devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Themes and Apps sections will indeed have some redundancy, and we may remove those forums except from the main Galaxy S I9000. Then the trouble becomes that people will post about themes and apps with the OTHER forums like General, etc. So, we'll have to play it by ear and see how things go!
Keep the forums separate, but how about having a universal Themes and Apps topics all linked to the main one here?
can we have all the varieties themes and apps page link to the galaxy s one? Accessories and ROM dev. is nice to have separated but general and apps do not. If a thread poster feels it is phone specific he can just state the variant in the title no?
svetius said:
We heard from a lot of users and moderators on the issue of whether to put all Galaxy S forums under one roof or to offer separate forums for them all.
For the sake of keeping confusion to a minimum plus ensuring that XDA stays as organized as possible, we've officially decided to launch forums for all four variants of the Galaxy S. We expect these four devices (plus the unlocked Galaxy S) to be very popular devices once they're on sale.
Here are the links!
Sprint Epic 4G
AT&T Captivate
T-Mobile Vibrant
Verizon Fascinate
This forum will be for the unlocked European version of the Galaxy S that has been on sale since June.
Thanks to everyone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the admins decided to go against the popular vote? Marvelous.
crabby
sorry.. but bad move to create separate forums... we now have to check 5 forums to find what we want.
this reminds me of the G1/Magic32B/Magic32A forums where nearly all development and modding was posted in the G1 forum (dev device), leaving the Magic forums abandoned, or full of links to G1 forum posts for those with 32B radios.
I predict that the Vibrant & Euro unlocked S will be the most used devices, leaving the other forums as good as empty or posted with stuff like "I found this on the Vibrant/S forum".
what about the forum search? will we now need to search all forums? increases the load right?
anyway.. last time I checked the poll regarding this, most of the users voted for seperate SUB forums.. did this change so drastically in the last weeks?
Separate forums of the SAME device by US carriers??? WTF?
Disagree... completely.
magicdroid said:
sorry.. but bad move to create separate forums... we now have to check 5 forums to find what we want.
this reminds me of the G1/Magic32B/Magic32A forums where nearly all development and modding was posted in the G1 forum (dev device), leaving the Magic forums abandoned, or full of links to G1 forum posts for those with 32B radios.
I predict that the Vibrant & Euro unlocked S will be the most used devices, leaving the other forums as good as empty or posted with stuff like "I found this on the Vibrant/S forum".
what about the forum search? will we now need to search all forums? increases the load right?
anyway.. last time I checked the poll regarding this, most of the users voted for seperate SUB forums.. did this change so drastically in the last weeks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely.
I see no reason for 5 separate forums. I think a much better idea would have to have a single GalaxyS forum, and add subforums for specific variants as the need arises (if it ever does).
Having 5 forums just wastes everyone's time. It even makes searching useless .
reuthermonkey said:
Precisely.
I see no reason for 5 separate forums. I think a much better idea would have to have a single GalaxyS forum, and add subforums for specific variants as the need arises (if it ever does).
Having 5 forums just wastes everyone's time. It even makes searching useless .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What amazing is they ask for a vote then go against it WTF
I think it would have been best to make them all in 1 forum and then have a sub forums for GSM and CDMA...
or make a sub forum for each device and a main forum for all of them to have a General...
cause there are many issues people are talking about in the Vibrant and the I9000 which are EXACTLY the same...
not to mention we need some stickies with common issues and questions..
On a similar note. The Samsung Vibrant or Galaxy S similar to the european version has 4 haptic buttons whereas the latter has only 2 and the
Big plastic intergrated middle button. Is this something people would prefer and would it be beneficial in the long run of android where it would
have been if the phone was to run windows 7.
BTW.... I Am not pleased that the American market also shipped this with the Avatar Film pre-installed...LOL!
Okay, so there have been 8 million threads about the fabled "Nexus Two" and what it will mean for the development and the future of the Vibrant. So I figured I should just create one thread for everybody (or at least most people) to use for all their specualtion needs.
Common Topics:
Will a Samsung Nexus Two mean we're going straight to Gingerbread?
How will this help Vibrant/Galaxy S development?
Will you get one?
Does this mean CyanogenMod will finally be supported for the Galaxy S?
So speculate away!
Yet you created 8 million+1
lqaddict said:
Yet you created 8 million+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I'm hoping this will be the last one, so people don't create their own threads... or at least their threads get merged into this one.
+2
+2 it will happen when it happens................ as for speculation
It is usually 6 months of anticipation followed by
3 hours of begging followed by
2 min sec of exhilaration Followed by
30 LONG SECONDS of dissatisfaction followed by
Looking to what's next................
So it looks like the guys over at Androidpsin.com are bringing up information about Samsung manufacturing the NII. Is this true? Or what is going on here? My last thread got trashed because it was "false".
Here's the link http://androidspin.com/2010/11/05/nexus-2-launch-plagued-by-hardware-issues/
Am I the only one who finds it hard to believe that "a major hardware issue" was discovered little more than a week before launching a new product?
Testing on a device like this would have been done over the course of months and probably finalized long before an unveiling to the public.
pdefazio said:
Am I the only one who finds it hard to believe that "a major hardware issue" was discovered little more than a week before launching a new product?
Testing on a device like this would have been done over the course of months and probably finalized long before an unveiling to the public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is Samsung we are talking about. They pushed the Galaxy S line to the States with knowledge of the GPS issues.. so maybe they're being smart about this one? (If in fact it's true)
That bit was reported by Tech Crunch and no source was cited for it. Currently it's all rumor and speculation.
I agree. I am not so much as concerned with the statements of hardware with the post, but if the post is true or not. And if not, why is Androidspin.com putting more bad posts.
Off Topic for this section, please keep off topic threads away from the vibrant area, discuss them in the Off Topic fora under general
Since Vodafone UK have abandoned selling the 10.1v and now decided to go with the 10.1 Wifi+3G, they have updated their specs page.
And it lists a 1.2Ghz processor??! Doesn't mention Dual Core though?
Does this mean that the Wifi+3G version will come with a different SoC? Exynos perhaps?
Let the speculation commence!
http://shop.vodafone.co.uk/shop/mob...xy-tab-10-1?dfacid=1&cid=aff-aw-default-78888
Pointless thread... look before you leap:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1115458
hshah said:
Pointless thread... look before you leap:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1115458
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair to StuMcBill, the discussion is under a fairly obscure title and discussions of the 1.2GHz/Exynos isn't mentioned in the opening post (so you don't see anything from the tooltip summary when hovering over the list of topics).
Techno79 said:
To be fair to StuMcBill, the discussion is under a fairly obscure title and discussions of the 1.2GHz/Exynos isn't mentioned in the opening post (so you don't see anything from the tooltip summary when hovering over the list of topics).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fine
We think it is a mistake on the website and they are copying the specifications of the SGS2. Samsung have not been very good as releasing official specifications so they are to blame for any confusion.
And they've fixed it
Sent from Samsung Galaxy S II
https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-rolls-back-on-V30-Android-Pie-commitment.426519.0.html
Question based on the above referenced article:
So LG has reversed course on the V30 receiving pie?
Opinion: What a sham(e).
Hopefully this will serve to clear up the gray area that can be perceived as "misinformation".
EDIT: TURNS OUT THE OP HAS A SEVERE READING COMPREHENSION PROBLEM VS SPREADING MISINFORMATION. In his edited post #1, he cites the very article I QUOTED to him in my reply #1. My QUOTE PROVED LG Pie was still coming -- just delayed. Somehow he used that article as basis to ask is V30 Pie was cancelled. Very strange.
This post below is the ORIGINAL POST, minus the misinformation allegation. I edited one to sentence to instead ask if he had actually read the article. Again, this is the article I replied to him with, and now he cites it as his original thesis question.
_________
Shawnashley said:
So LG has reversed course on the V30 receiving pie? What a sham(e).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, LG has not "reversed course" on V30 Pie.
Did you ACTUALLY READ the article? Clearly states V30 Pie is merely delayed due to beta stability issues found during testing -- which LG are solving.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=79808742&postcount=109
or
https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-rolls-back-on-V30-Android-Pie-commitment.426519.0.html
We are just 4 days away from Q3, and now LG Korea has announced that it has postponed the Pie roll-out for "essential improvements found during the quality stabilization process". Apparently, this delay was "an unavoidable thing", which seems like an odd admission. LG has now pushed the update until at least July with the company stating that it will do its best to release the OS update in July.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
ChazzMatt said:
No, LG has not "reversed course" on V30 Pie.
Please don't spread misinformation.
V30 Pie is merely delayed due to beta stability issues found during testing -- which LG are solving.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=79808742&postcount=109
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well with no fixed release dates outside of South Korea I won't be holding my breath. Death doesn't become me.
Shawnashley said:
Well with no fixed release dates outside of South Korea I won't be holding my breath. Death doesn't become me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There were never any fixed dates outside Korea.
The promised "Q2" was for Korea V30. Everyone else was already assumed to get it later.
V40 was the exception where Korea variants did not get it first.
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
ChazzMatt said:
No, LG has not "reversed course" on V30 Pie.
Please don't spread misinformation.
V30 Pie is merely delayed due to beta stability issues found during testing -- which LG are solving.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=79808742&postcount=109
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe I am spreading misinformation, by asking a question. I did not unequivocally state anything that I declared vociferously to be fact.
In the interest of good will among the human race can we be slightly less contrarian about such things?
Thanks.
EDIT: TURNS OUT THE OP HAS A SEVERE READING COMPREHENSION PROBLEM VS SPREADING MISINFORMATION. In his edited post #1, he cites the very article I QUOTED to him in my reply #1. My QUOTE PROVED LG Pie was still coming -- just delayed. Somehow he used that article as basis to ask is V30 Pie was cancelled. Very strange.
_________
Shawnashley said:
I don't believe I am spreading misinformation, by asking a question. I did not unequivocally state anything that I declared vociferously to be fact.
In the interest of good will among the human race can we be slightly less contrarian about such things?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then I answered your "question". You can find LG's statement in the link above, posted in the V30 forum where you would expect to find such information.
But it wasn't just a question...
Shawnashley said:
So LG has reversed course on the V30 receiving pie? What a sham(e).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"What a sham/shame" indicates you are making a statement. That your "question" is actually a known fact, and you are just finding it out. That's the misinformation part. You are stating your leading (faux) question as a fact and then rendering an opinion on that alleged situation.
"So the pope is really an atheist? What a sham(e)" < See how that works?
And in your first reply to me you defended your STATEMENT, saying lack of revised release dates proved your contention V30 Pie has been cancelled at least for non-Korean variants.
Only now in your 2nd reply are you changing tactics and saying you were "Just Asking Questions."
There's actually a category of troll-like behavior (no, I'm not calling you a troll) called JAQ'ing off -- where people say they are "Just Asking Questions", when really they are peddling misinformation.
I'll make a deal...You edit your first post to be more clear it's JUST an honest question -- and I'll edit my reply to simply answer your question.
It's also strange you didn't just search the news or even ask your "question" in the V30 XDA forum -- instead of the V35 forum (which has nothing to do with the V30) -- if you were really looking for information on V30 Pie? The V30 Pie DELAY has been in the news for several days and discussed in the V30 forum, of course. The link I gave you in my first reply was from a post in the V30 forum.
Otherwise, yeah it seems you probably knew V30 is still getting Pie -- it's just delayed for reason already explained, and you just wanted to spread a little misinformation in the V35 forum and hoping no one in here knew better? At least that's my interpretation until you edit your first post to prove otherwise.
I will always correct perceived misinformation, and that is not being contrary.
Just edit your first post and I'll edit my replies.
Shawnashley said:
I won't be holding my breath. Death doesn't become me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ChazzMatt said:
Well then I answered your "question". You can find LG's statement in the link above, posted in the V30 forum where you would expect to find such information.
But it wasn't just a question...
"What a sham/shame" indicates you are making a statement. That your "question" is actually a known fact, and you are just finding it out. That's the misinformation part. You are stating your leading (faux) question as a fact and then rendering an opinion on that alleged situation.
"So the pope is really an atheist? What a sham(e)" < See how that works?
And in your first reply to me you defended your STATEMENT, saying lack of revised release dates proved your contention V30 Pie has been cancelled at least for non-Korean variants.
Only now in your 2nd reply are you changing tactics and saying you were "Just Asking Questions."
There's actually a category of troll-like behavior (no, I'm not calling you a troll) called JAQ'ing off -- where people say they are "Just Asking Questions", when really they are peddling misinformation.
I'll make a deal...You edit your first post to be more clear it's JUST an honest question -- and I'll edit my reply to simply answer your question.
It's also strange you didn't just search the news or even ask your "question" in the V30 XDA forum -- instead of the V35 forum (which has nothing to do with the V30) -- if you were really looking for information on V30 Pie? The V30 Pie DELAY has been in the news for several days and discussed in the V30 forum, of course. The link I gave you in my first reply was from a post in the V30 forum.
Otherwise, yeah it seems you probably knew V30 is still getting Pie -- it's just delayed for reason already explained, and you just wanted to spread a little misinformation in the V35 forum and hoping no one in here knew better? At least that's my interpretation until you edit your first post to prove otherwise.
I will always correct perceived misinformation, and that is not being contrary.
Just edit your first post and I'll edit my replies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did edit the post and hopefully it is more clear in its content and intent. I do ask that perhaps "misinformation" not be left up to a persons interpretation.
Thank you.
Shawnashley said:
I did edit the post and hopefully it is more clear in its content and intent. I do ask that perhaps "misinformation" not be left up to a persons interpretation.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you actually read the article? It's very clear V30 Pie is just delayed. THAT is the article I quoted in my 1st reply to you.
There's no way you can ask the original question if V30 Pie is cancelled if you read the article.
I will edit my posts to reflect your lack of reading comprehension vs blatant misinformation. It also means you never even read my first reply, for you to choose THAT article as the source for your question. That was the article where I PROVED it's not cancelled!
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
ChazzMatt said:
Did you actually read the article? It's very clear V30 Pie is just delayed. THAT is the article I quoted in my 1st reply to you.
There's no way you can ask the original question if V30 Pie is cancelled if you read the article.
I will edit my posts to reflect your lack of reading comprehension vs blatant misinformation. It also means you never even read my first reply, for you to choose THAT article as the source for your question. That was the article where I PROVED it's not cancelled!
Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I read the article. It was the reason I posted the "question". I read more than one actually. Should I post the links here?
Speaking of reading comprehension, maybe you should look into that yourself. Unless of course you care to point out where I said the update was cancelled? In which case you PROVED nothing.
I do however admire your tenacity and enthusiasm.