Hey guys, im just about to install ubuntu on my android phone, think im running froyo atm.
My questions is it requires what i remember hearing as loopback compiled in the kernel, which stock android has. Im wondering if samsungs kernel build has this also?
If so its just a case of installing it from shell and im away
I found something about porting cyanogenmod kernels, check these linkshttp://wiki.ilynow.com/How_to_build_a_kernel_port_for_CM5
andhttp://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Howto:_Build_a_Kernel_Port
start working i will be happy
I've been trying to compile roms for a week now and the last few days I had succes with building CM9 from source and AOKP from source. Those are not that hard to build and it didn't take that long. To build these roms from source was a very good practice and helps me to go into further rom building.
But from the beginning my goal was to build a rom using the Google AOSP source. As I know that's not as easy as building something like CM9 but it is possible right? But it is possible as far as I know.
What I tried to do was to sync with the stock Android repo and synced the CM9 device tree and kernel etc but it didn't worked as I don't know what to edit and what I exactly need to build a working rom.
So what I want to know is: How do I build a working ROM from the stock Android ICS source? And what do I need to edit and to download (what sources etc)?
I don't need every step full described, but can anyone explain me all the steps what (files/repo's) I need and what files I need to edit to compile a full working ROM. Or isn't it that simple?
Last month some guy (stormtroopercs or something like that) said he will post a tutorial but I didn't see anything from him and the topic from that guy is dead.
Thank you very much for your help!
(My working space is fully setup so I don't need to know how to setup a building enviroment!)
which is the best AOSP rom for galaxy s2?
which is the best AOSP rom for galaxy s2?
I am also looking for the same..
see this thread
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1] SuperNexus - I9100
I am using this ROM and its very stable so far except common known issues.
So, @neXus PRIME wants to make a locked bootloader-compatible ROM, aside from his wonderful AOSPA port. Now it's your choice, so choose the ROM you want carefully.
Huh one choice...
But one is not enough .-.
I know, but my hard disk space is not enough.
I have currently PA and aokp sources.
I am planning to replace aokp sources with the one you guys pick here. I can do a third too but then i will have to delete ccache space... But that is not good.
I'd like to see MIUI get updated to the latest version and see how that runs on our device because the MIUI interface itself looks pretty slick, and if possible a port of multirom would be a nice thing as well (if possible: don't know if our device is using fstab or rc)
noahvt said:
I'd like to see MIUI get updated to the latest version and see how that runs on our device because the MIUI interface itself looks pretty slick, and if possible a port of multirom would be a nice thing as well (if possible: don't know if our device is using fstab or rc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree too
Like Paranoid Nexus, there is the chance of chosen rom to work with unlocked bootloader?
I can choice easier if I know which rom has what kind of features.
Actually MIUI seems like a good idea, plus it's a bit different when compared to the AOSP bunch.
Yeah MIUI would be cool, but if not i would love to see carbon or pacman on LBL.
@neXus PRIME
i appreciate your hard work buddy
instead of which rom you compile,i think we need advanced custom kernel like doomkernel...i'm currently using pacman 4.4.4 and none of cutom kernel present on forum does'nt works
Can we have avatar rom!
Avatar, Chameleon, AOSBam, Sonic.....wtf.... so many kangerzzz
But why is PURE AOSP winning out???
Don't know why but vanir being a ubl ROM is really fast and smooth, is it in the ROM or the optimisations by the dev??
In the feature code, ahe has mentioned many compiler optimisations, isbit because of them or the ROM????
I would have said Slimkat if bagyusz doesn't update it, but as of now i don't know if he will.
An update to the latest MIUI would be lovely, locked or unlocked BL is a matter of secondary importance for me
Apart from that Carbon, Vanir and PACman on a stock/stock-based kernel would also be nice
neXus PRIME said:
Avatar, Chameleon, AOSBam, Sonic.....wtf.... so many kangerzzz
But why is PURE AOSP winning out???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that some peoples want to have the android L version. Also they choosed Pure AOSP. This day, Google push the sdk of the android l version.
For android kitkat based, you can do MIUI Rom or if you want an AOSP, you can choose the AOKP.
The problem with android L is we'd have to check the LBL kernel modules we have work on it otherwise its another big job to update (if its even possible).
No L possible. End of story. Just vote the available choices
Well, when I was adding AOSP to the poll I didn't even think of Android L. Maybe I should have written it more precisely.
And yeah, there is a lot of work to do to make L work on LBL. The first thing that's coming to my head are Adreno drivers from 4.3(we are using them in KitKat, so it's not clean and fully working by any means). The second thing is power saving mode in L: we don't know if that's a kernel or OS feature... And there are many things that may result in a complete incompatibility between our kernel and Android L, and changing ramdisks won't help in that case.
Aren't the sources for L coming out in September? Why even talk about it now, wait till the Cyanogen team start to push the first nightlies, then we can put Android 5.0 in the conversation
I'm trying to build aosp oreo for this phone, but im getting errors during compilation, and i think that some steps in the guide are outdated or something. Could someone who's built aosp help me out with all the steps?