Database Users

CM7 Nighlies Updated: 8/1/11

ADVANCED USERS ONLY.
MAKE A BACKUP. THESE BUILDS COULD MAKE THE PHONE USELESS AS A PHONE!
SERIOUSLY. This is an unofficial CM7 build with cherry picks (from CM's Gerrit) of unfinished mods and/or broken code that is continually changing. New users should STAY AWAY FROM HERE. There is NO SUPPORT for this build, by myself or anyone else, so don't expect it. Do not file bug reports on the CM issue tracker from these builds. If you have to ask about compatibilities (which HBOOT version is needed, if A2SD scripts work, etc) you SHOULDN'T BE HERE. Don't PM me with silly questions, because they probably won't be answered.Rebased to CM source @ 8/1/11
I understand there is no support provided, and I will brick my phone by flashing this! OLD 3/31 BUILD
md5sum: 2d66e2e72e775ef736b0daa49ab22b6b
SHA1: dce98e947a08b52726fb0a2bf324e05ef2581b12
All credit goes to cyanogen & #teamdouche, I'm just a guy with a spare computer that learned how to compile and install Ubuntu without breaking Windows 8....
Credit to @RyanMacG for #Euroskank hosting!​Some recent device related CM7 commits since last build:
None. At least on the official CM git.
Items from CM's Gerrit I have manually cherry-picked:
Not seeing any good ones. Look and suggest some!
If I stop using certain cherry picked commits all of a sudden, it's either: because they were merged, or the mod is based on older code than what is in CM currently and merge fails.
Known Bugs:
None apart from what the latest official slayher build has AFAIK
Build Status
Getting source for mecha related stuff and finding code to cherry pick. Should be built and uploaded by 9:30AM 8/2/11 CST
Please visit @cmsrc or CM's Gerrit for a complete list of commits.
Style of thread kanged from fitsnugly's Nexus One thread with permission.

So there are still a lot of issues with the gb build then? Or are they nearing a final working version? And by no means am i asking for an eta or anything just curious as to the progress being made.

Right now it runs. That's all I can say. But it is a lot better of a first build than other devices.... If I can get a working vendor built this weekend,we may see some progress(wifi working maybe....)
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Same thing that was with my builds guys. Not worth it. Compile on your own for now if you really want this. There is no data, no calls, nothing. Until RIL is figured out, then CyanogenMod 7 is useless. I will be building full time once RIL is sorted but for now, these are useless other than having bragging rights. Not trying to discourage the OP but rather letting the masses know what's up.

otto888 said:
Right now it runs. That's all I can say. But it is a lot better of a first build than other devices.... If I can get a working vendor built this weekend,we may see some progress(wifi working maybe....)
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might be able to get some help from @gearheadcustoms and @gridlock (Twitter) in fixing some of the issues you mentioned. A running CM7 nightly is progress. Sure this will be all fixed up within due time. Thanks to Euroskank, with corpses

ProTekk said:
Same thing that was with my builds guys. Not worth it. Compile on your own for now if you really want this. There is no data, no calls, nothing. Until RIL is figured out, then CyanogenMod 7 is useless. I will be building full time once RIL is sorted but for now, these are useless other than having bragging rights. Not trying to discourage the OP but rather letting the masses know what's up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the issue with RIL?

i have a build from another dev that runs and i have gapps but no data so you cant sign in and wifi throws you into a bootloop...we needa kernel and i think we will finally have GB for the TB!

RIL: Radio Interface Layer.
The only reason that we have no data/text/calling/etc for CM 7. These threads are beating a dead horse. Wait until we have a working test build. I'll start building again once we have that.
The issue is, it's not open source.

ProTekk said:
RIL: Radio Interface Layer.
The only reason that we have no data/text/calling/etc for CM 7. These threads are beating a dead horse. Wait until we have a working test build. I'll start building again once we have that.
The issue is, it's not open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I thought RIL was made open source, guess not. But like all development, it starts with baby steps. Thank ProTekk

Man i cant wiat till yous figure this out...Im jonesin for sum GB

I think the title needs changing, and I really wish these builds were not posted if no one was willing to support them.
We end up getting the questions on irc, people don't read the disclaimers/warnings. The howto stealing sites (thats you A.T.) remove the warnings.
Maybe change title to "CM Builds - DATEHERE - NON-FUNCTIONAL" so less ppl will mess with it.

So we need to find the RIL files leaked? Or how do you get them?

andrew53517 said:
So we need to find the RIL files leaked? Or how do you get them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You give the devs time to RE them, and write new ones.

jcase said:
You give the devs time to RE them, and write new ones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh gotcha. So they have to make them compatible. That makes more sense. Now the closed source comment makes sense.
Thunderbolt Rooted!

This is absurd. Mods should lock this thread until we get a working rom.

No offense... but why? This thread is misleading, this thread will cause noobs too eff up their sh*t (despite your clearly stated warnings, they will not take them seriously), this thread is utterly useless because CM7 is not working, CM Parts are not working, RIL is not working...
Flashing this will make your phone useless (just like this thread).
Besides, there are already threads dedicated to compiling daily builds of CM7. Those threads have been put on hold (like they should) until CM7 is ready to be compiled. Even then, many people will flash extremely early builds of CM and wonder why certain functionality is missing or why x,y, and z does not work.
The underlying point is that this thread is going nowhere fast and will only cause problems. At least wait until the RIL is re-engineered and working.

Thank you.

Prrrooo sup d; ?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

nerogold said:
Prrrooo sup d; ?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not much back full time again
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Good to see .anxious to flash cm7.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

ICS 4.0.3 Beta 1 for the SGS2

Hey guys
I'm more of a reader than a poster but anyway, I came across a guy that has created a ICS Rom with the help of some guys on here I believe ???
Anyway the ROM is there for download and sees to be pretty close to a finished artical.
I guess go have a look give it a try and if it is as described then Happy New Year to everyone
http://sgs2android.weebly.com/downloads.html
Enjoy

airbus360........
Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk

Look at his build.prop, sais everything about this guy. Instead of crediting Teamhacksung for almost everything he took from them he just insults them in his super tuned build.prop.

I`m afraid to ask... changelog???

rtimoff said:
afraid to ask... changelog???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same as the latest build from codeworkx, plus some magical build.prop tweaks:
http://sgs2android.weebly.com said:
Download link to BETA 1.0 in the download section/
- New kernel XXKP4 is going to be used,
- Headphones are fixed
- Have added those cm9 tweaks that the CM team were all being ro.arrogant.c***s=1 about them, Runs faster and stable compared to CM9
- Audio is fully fixed. Media Volume now Changes.
- Camera now takes at full 8mp.
- YouTube playback is now working but has some colour issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

cTrox said:
The same as the latest build from codeworkx, plus some magical build.prop tweaks:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thx
So, what the point of this thread?

well I guess theres some conflict here but as long as the Rom works and everyone that was involved gets a mention I'm happy. Surley thats the main thing right give everyone what they want, anyway thats enough from me, happy new year to you guys its there if you want it

Does the ROM work fine?

Any nitz and RIL issues?

All this slating of airbus360. However if anyone bothers to try his rom, it is much better. I've been using cm9 since the first alpha up to the most recent release. It was good, but not a patch on this. Airbus's rom is much smoother, especially when flicking between home screens. Its also a lot faster. So although he may have used Teamhacksung code, he's obviously incorporated a few improvements of his own. Before anyone criticises, they should install it. It's a step up from the current cm9 builds.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

blinde said:
Any nitz and RIL issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly the same as CM9, except it's not using CM9 launcher and quick toggles in status bar.

So, is this rom fully working? What remains to be fixed?

This is not a development thread, there is no development going on. So, moving this to general.

freemini said:
This is exactly the same as CM9, except it's not using CM9 launcher and quick toggles in status bar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my whole point, if you bothered to install this, you would realise it is not the same as cm9. Don't listen to others and try it yourself. Its much smoother and faster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Maggot82 said:
well I guess theres some conflict here but as long as the Rom works and everyone that was involved gets a mention I'm happy. Surley thats the main thing right give everyone what they want, anyway thats enough from me, happy new year to you guys its there if you want it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with all due respect- can you give us changelog from author?

rtimoff said:
with all due respect- can you give us changelog from author?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already gave you the changelog from the author. It's right here: http://sgs2android.weebly.com

Is it good for everyday use? Since KP1 was terrible. TIA

He has also mentioned this in his website
Update 30/12/11 @ 12:27PM
- Using CM9 lib's from Teamhacksung to fix things in this as we speak.* Please say thanks to them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyway, will be useful if someone provides feedback of this. the latest build of cm9 itself is running smooth and great!

bala_gamer said:
He has also mentioned this in his website
anyway, will be useful if someone provides feedback of this. the latest build of cm9 itself is running smooth and great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Noon Question. How to install this so called beta version. Help pls.....

Been using this since last night.
Basically, looks the same as CM9 minus a few modifications, yet the ROM is a lot smoother then CM9.
Battery for me is great, roughly 1% loss an hour. Removed all uneeded apps via Titanium Backup.
Ive noticed one slight problem with the incoming call screen, icons misplaced. BUT, Still can be used.
I've had No FC's either.
I do really reccomend this ROM

Linaro-Code will improve Android 4.0.4 !

Hey guys!
In Samsung Galaxy S forum i found something veeeeeeeeeery interesting!
It's about the Linaro-Code that should speed up Android about a noticeable amount!
Just take a look at this video:
Linaro-Video from Youtube
(This is the related article: cnx-software.com)
Idk what i should think about it. If it really works, i guess it would be worth a try ?!
Here is another article, which says, that it can speed up Android 2 times!
"The Linaro team, who’s constantly working on optimizing software for the ARM
architecture, has worked on optimizing the latest version of Android as well, and
they claim up to 2x improvement in performance compared to stock Android
4.0.4, running on the same TI OMAP 4430 hardware. The improvements are
mostly CPU-related, even though they are showing a graphical object to test the
performance. They’ve managed to double the FPS for this particular test, but
they’ve also managed to increase the Sunspider performance by 30%, which is
also quite a big deal."
- quote from this article.

Some one has already posted bout this and its incompatible with our kernel
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA

There are there posts in this section
The original started by Persian sphinx and this has already been discuss by hillbeast in his thread
Why isn't any one searching for similar threads
Sent from my superphone using superswift Swype

This is very interesting, but will this work on any 4.0 device? btw, no need to re-post the same thing (no offence)

Jason-EX said:
This is very interesting, but will this work on any 4.0 device? btw, no need to re-post the same thing (no offence)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hillbeast tried to compile it for his serenity builds but got errors along the way i think we need a better kernel to use it
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA

It would be compiled in kernel 3.x
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!

bscraze said:
It would be compiled in kernel 3.x
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, that will be awesome :good:

Jason-EX said:
well, that will be awesome :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it would really be. I just posted it because I thought kernel 3.x could handle it.
Sorry for double-posting this topic.
Anyway; if our developers find more time and are able to make kernel 3.x running
(which would be awesome!) our phone would get an enourmous speed-boost.

We have used it in our CM9 port on LG P500, but there are still some issues to solve, but our Linaro-build is smooth So good luck! If a dev needs some info on how to include it in their code, look at our project-site github.com/lgics

Where is the Thread of Slim ICS v4.2?

hi
was the development for the slim ics port stopped? because the thread just vanished and i can't find it again. Am i too stupid or did somebody really delete it?
the thread about the sd version is still there: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1763112
the thread was here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1759815
cu

I haven't been following it lately, but I saw a dispute whether the developer should have made a slim version of an already available ROM or not. So it is likely that the original ROM developer asked to cease the slim port and sought a thread closure.

Marvlesz said:
I haven't been following it lately, but I saw a dispute whether the developer should have made a slim version of an already available ROM or not. So it is likely that the original ROM developer asked to cease the slim port and sought a thread closure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if the thread would have been simply closed like others i would agree, but this thread vanished completely. the dispute was on the first two pages. how can a rom-cooker demand that his android rom doesn't get ported? credits where given where they where due and apart of that aosp is oss.

Screemi said:
if the thread would have been simply closed like others i would agree, but this thread vanished completely. the dispute was on the first two pages. how can a rom-cooker demand that his android rom doesn't get ported? credits where given where they where due and apart of that aosp is oss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fully agree wirh you.
What was wrong with porting rom and giving credits to original Dev?
For me it was the fastest, smallest ics rom for hd2.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

Post deleted. But i have links. Long live Google Cache

From slim ics site:
"Supported Devices here, no extra devices for now ( and NO PORTS of Slim ICS)"
"http://source.android.com New versions will also be announced through this site."
"Fully built from AOSP sources with some cherry picks from CM and AOKP team, Easy to customize features (thanks to AOKP team)"
Atm trying to be calm but... Lets just say it piss me off this kind of thing.
This guy need to look at Miui team, they have right set of mind.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

Where is @zorua BTW? Has him have deleted too?

Traukoman said:
Where is @zorua BTW? Has him have deleted too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope not!
It would be nice if a moderator (or someone that knows and is objective about it) can tell us what happened. If it ended up in a heated argument I wouldn't want someone telling us only his half of the story - but I really would like to know.

DeeinSouthAfrica said:
Hope not!
It would be nice if a moderator (or someone that knows and is objective about it) can tell us what happened. If it ended up in a heated argument I wouldn't want someone telling us only his half of the story - but I really would like to know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Btw dev of original Slim ics rom seems had allergy reaction on porting his rom. As i allready posted. What i dont get it, how in open source community is it possible? Isn't whole point to be open, share with ofc giving credits to ppl which contributed?
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

maneken25 said:
Same here. Btw dev of original Slim ics rom seems had allergy reaction on porting his rom. As i allready posted. What i dont get it, how in open source community is it possible? Isn't whole point to be open, share with ofc giving credits to ppl which contributed?
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it was pulled by a moderator upon request personally I think it's within reason. The thread wasn't stated as being Unofficial, which it should have been, and with a system partition of 130MB it can hardly even be called a slim OS (other full fat ROMs are 150); nevermind comparable to SlimICS which are half that size (54 - 70). And besides the last post I seen on the thread was from the OP who said he wasn't happy with the build and wanted to change the ROM he was porting from, and it was only an alpha.
On a similar note, if a small ICS rom is to come along, I personally thing it would be benificial if we could utilise squashfs. This would require kernel support, the toggles are there to turn on squashfs support in dorimanx, but it may require a module from somewhere, I'll PM dori tomorrow concerning this unless someone here know if squash can/can't be used with our bootloaders / device. Only problem I can for see is in module compatibility, and if it works should allow for smaller versions of our current ROMs.

Your position is legit but non of the slim ics roms include gapps and trebucht as launcher. It was comparable to other full roms with about 50-100mb less memory. And for me it's totally legit to port a ROM from one to an other device if you give credit and state which Tom was ported. Would be different if there was some own coding for tools and drivers was done. Don't distribute my tools without my permission is different than don't share something i picked up somewhere else and used it for my own work. That's not how the gold licence works.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app

HypoTurtle said:
If it was pulled by a moderator upon request personally I think it's within reason. The thread wasn't stated as being Unofficial, which it should have been, and with a system partition of 130MB it can hardly even be called a slim OS (other full fat ROMs are 150); nevermind comparable to SlimICS which are half that size (54 - 70). And besides the last post I seen on the thread was from the OP who said he wasn't happy with the build and wanted to change the ROM he was porting from, and it was only an alpha.
On a similar note, if a small ICS rom is to come along, I personally thing it would be benificial if we could utilise squashfs. This would require kernel support, the toggles are there to turn on squashfs support in dorimanx, but it may require a module from somewhere, I'll PM dori tomorrow concerning this unless someone here know if squash can/can't be used with our bootloaders / device. Only problem I can for see is in module compatibility, and if it works should allow for smaller versions of our current ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of ics roms are from 150 to 220m(miui).
This rom without gapps was around 85mb.
I have atm slim ics with trimmed gapps and some media files that fit in less then 120mb, if i compare to other ics rom which i used as trimmet down, they were from 140 to 190mb imho it was really Slim version of rom
Edit: Maybe it was beta version but worked without problems and it was the fastest ics i tried and i tried them alot
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

maneken25 said:
Most of ics roms are from 150 to 220m(miui).
This rom without gapps was around 85mb.
I have atm slim ics with trimmed gapps and some media files that fit in less then 120mb, if i compare to other ics rom which i used as trimmet down, they were from 140 to 190mb imho it was really Slim version of rom
Edit: Maybe it was beta version but worked without problems and it was the fastest ics i tried and i tried them alot
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair point, the last zip I downloaded had a system folder of 130MB thats where I got my sizes from,have had a play with squashfs and have shrunk this down from 130 to 92MB. Will try tomorrow to get a kernel to compile properly and see if squash works here. Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster. Have you had any issues when trying to make a call /pressing the call button?

Screemi said:
Your position is legit but non of the slim ics roms include gapps and trebucht as launcher. It was comparable to other full roms with about 50-100mb less memory. And for me it's totally legit to port a Tom from one to an other device if you give credit and state which Tom was ported. Would be different if there was some own coding for tools and drivers was done. Don't distribute my tools without my permission is different than don't share something i picked up somewhere else and used it for my own work. That's not how the gold licence works.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tom who?
The thread is not in the trash-can subforum (Confirmed)
It was serious then

+ Que PPC said:
Tom who?
The thread is not in the trash-can subforum (Confirmed)
It was serious then
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tom is dictionary suggestion for ROM, it happens often to my SwiftKey keyboard also
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

HypoTurtle said:
Fair point, the last zip I downloaded had a system folder of 130MB thats where I got my sizes from,have had a play with squashfs and have shrunk this down from 130 to 92MB. Will try tomorrow to get a kernel to compile properly and see if squash works here. Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster. Have you had any issues when trying to make a call /pressing the call button?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i don't consider common issues which have most of ics hd2, like sometimes funky memory management which on heavy duty can produce little problems, there aren't any un ordinary problem.
Calls working very snappy.
In fact whole rom is fast, responsive, low battery consumption, apps which i tested working correctly even Ted app.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium

+ Que PPC said:
Tom who?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't you know Tom the damnautocorrection cat?
Mmhh, not even in the trash sub and the user got deleted as well? Must have been really serious. Would love to know what happened.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app

Screemi said:
don't you know Tom the damnautocorrection cat?
Mmhh, not even in the trash sub and the user got deleted as well? Must have been really serious. Would love to know what happened.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he didnt get deleted http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=4212197

HypoTurtle said:
Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried both, as well as some other ICS rom and believe me, it's faster than any other 4.0.4 around here. In fact I'm using it as my daily and I find it excellent, such a shame the thread has been deleted.

Hi ppl, sorry for the silence on this. Apparently there was a problem with permissions for Zorua's thread, I asked the moderators advice on the future of my thread, and it was decided to close my thread also. I have no problem with this decision.
Sorry for any inconvenience to anybody caused by this episode.
It is a great shame though, it was a really nice build.

[ROM] [DISCONTINUED] Another Unofficial CM13

(Sorry for bad English)
Before anybody ask me to fix things, i'm sorry, but i can't. These are "stable", so do a full wipe, and check if the problem solved.
You are doing this at your own risk
Hi guys.
I'm building daily CM13 for the OnePlus 3. Of course i can't guarantee that there will be a build every day, but that's the destination.
I know that there will be official cm13 soon, so i won't update this thread anymore, please delete it.
You can get my builds here.
(Nightly-nightlies: I uploaded them at about 7-8pm according to CEST UTC/GMT +2 hours)
Thanks @matssa for your guide
Known issues
Code:
- Dash Charging not working (OnePlus will release the source soon)
- CM bugs are exists
- You tell me :D
Changelog (Copy & paste from official 6P (angler) changelog, minus the specific 6P things)
20160722
(End of the night)
The last unofficial build by me. Big thanks to you guys
PackageManager: make protected-broadcasts permission aware (android_frameworks_base)
SysUI: Add first time use lock screen hints (android_frameworks_base)
Fix build (android_packages_apps_CMBugreport)
cm: Remove stray echo from extract_utils (android_vendor_cm)
Update iconography. (android_packages_apps_CMBugreport)
cm: Underp dumping of 64-bit only libraries (android_vendor_cm)
cm: Configure mmcblk1 IO on sys.io.scheduler prop (android_vendor_cm)
Special thanks to @Grarak, and @dianlujitao for their hard work!

All working fine seems like there is no more haptic feedback for alert slider why? /anyone able to switch to 5ghz wifi and find routers? Seems like i cant on any aosp build

_MartyMan_ said:
(Sorry for bad English)
Hi guys.
I'm building daily CM13 for the OnePlus 3. Of course i can't guarantee that there will be a build every day, but that's the destination.
I know that there are about 5 unofficial builds out there, so i will delete this thread when official cm13 appears.
You can get my builds here
(Nightly-nightlies: I'm uploading at 7-8pm according to CEST UTC/GMT +2 hours)
Thanks @matssa for your guide
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx buddy for that!!!All is working?Tnx!!!

nadejo said:
Thanks downloading...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome If you have a question, ask

Flamehell said:
Tnx buddy for that!!!All is working?Tnx!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome! Everything is working except Dash Charging, which will be implemented in the future

Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks

_MartyMan_ said:
You're welcome! Everything is working except Dash Charging, which will be implemented in the future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx buddy!!!So all the updates from Grarak are there right?Also the new security patch?Tnx for that,please keep it on!!!
---------- Post added at 11:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 PM ----------
Pr0metheus2 said:
Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only dash is not working....

Pr0metheus2 said:
Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, sure

nadejo said:
All working finde seems like there is no more haptic feedback for alert slider why? /anyone able to switch to 5ghz wifi and find routers? Seems like i cant on any aosp build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, it's a CM bug i think. :/

Flamehell said:
Tnx buddy!!!So all the updates from Grarak are there right?Also the new security patch?Tnx for that,please keep it on!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, @Grarak and @dianlujitao are the best!

_MartyMan_ said:
Yes, @Grarak and @dianlujitao are the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx a lot buddy!!!Rom is running perfect!!!Don t stop!!!

Flamehell said:
Tnx a lot buddy!!!Rom is running perfect!!!Don t stop!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again, but keep in mind that i just built it from source Chill, i wouldn't like to stop until official nightly builds.

What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?

kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He will do a nightly build,every day untill the official CM....after than that,i m happy when someone want to build....better for us my friend....

kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no difference from the other builds. I didn't say it's something special. Somewhere i agree with you. CM should be official now.

kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are several unofficial builds out there, but no one makes the builds every day, or at least shares them. The two CM devs don't really share their builds everyday, so it is nice to have several options where the ROM is updated daily. Furthermore, if one build has an issue, it is possible to use another build in order to check weither the ROM is bugged or is the builder the culprit (bad repo sync, etc...).

matssa said:
There are several unofficial builds out there, but no one makes the builds every day, or at least shares them. The two CM devs don't really share their builds everyday, so it is nice to have several options where the ROM is updated daily. Furthermore, if one build has an issue, it is possible to use another build in order to check weither the ROM is bugged or is the builder the culprit (bad repo sync, etc...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup they don't, because they wanna wait till it's integrated into CM's Jenkins, auto/official builds. It takes too long to do by their own(It can take like an hour depending on the hardware)

BRiANj64 said:
Yup they don't, because they wanna wait till it's integrated into CM's Jenkins, auto/official builds. It takes too long to do by their own(It can take like an hour depending on the hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah I made a little guide on how to build, and my build only take 10-15mins depending of the changes. The first build took around 2-3hours, but when you enable CCACHE, you reduce it a lot since it uses stuff from the last build.
For the HW, I'm using a VMWare workstation (virtual machine) with Ubuntu 16.XX, OS and software on SSD, VM on HHD (1Gb 7200rpm), i5 6500, 8Gb of RAM (5 given to VM, but seems to use more). For the repo sync, got a 30Mb/s wire (download speed is at 3Mb/s). So as you can see, it's not really a big big computer, I'm not even using my SSD for the building ^^

matssa said:
Nah I made a little guide on how to build, and my build only take 10-15mins depending of the changes. The first build took around 2-3hours, but when you enable CCACHE, you reduce it a lot since it uses stuff from the last build.
For the HW, I'm using a VMWare workstation (virtual machine) with Ubuntu 16.XX, OS and software on SSD, VM on HHD (1Gb 7200rpm), i5 6500, 8Gb of RAM (5 given to VM, but seems to use more). For the repo sync, got a 30Mb/s wire (download speed is at 3Mb/s). So as you can see, it's not really a big big computer, I'm not even using my SSD for the building ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yet it is a pain to do builds everyday on the same day. If you forget a day, people will complain and flame the hell out of you.(that's the XDA forums after all) This guy is really brave.
It's also hard to support people running 100's of different builds(Remember; CM doesn't even support their own official nightlies on their forums, you'll get your topic locked and/or downright ignored).

BRiANj64 said:
Yet it is a pain to do builds everyday on the same day. If you forget a day, people will complain and flame the hell out of you.(that's the XDA forums after all) This guy is really brave.
It's also hard to support people running 100's of different builds(Remember; CM doesn't even support their own official nightlies on their forums, you'll get your topic locked and/or downright ignored).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe yeah true, you forget one day and BOOM, got everyone on your back. And CM doesn't support it yet because they may have issues with the number of servers or even in terms of stability, trademark, etc...