(req.) more kernels - G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

To all developers please we would like to see some other kernel choices don't get me wrong paek is a great kernel it just doesn't play well with lmt pie launcher and I can't live without pie

Robshr said:
To all developers please we would like to see some other kernel choices don't get me wrong paek is a great kernel it just doesn't play well with lmt pie launcher and I can't live without pie
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DON'T WORRY!! the great @dorimanx will soon make our device a playground!

bervin said:
DON'T WORRY!! the great @dorimanx will soon make our device a playground!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yay can't wait there's so much more that can be done with this device

Holy sh*t dorimanx coming to g2??? I loved his kernel on my sgs2 :3
Sent from my LG D802

hm and don't forget the HTC HD2 allmighty

Related

[Q] ROM with Vanilla Android

Hey,
I was wondering if there's a "normal" stock android ROM available for the G3 anywhere. As much as I love the launchers ( and as much as I loathe Touchwiz), I really want to try out the "stock" Android..without any launchers. Just the one which Google gives.
cheekrox said:
Hey,
I was wondering if there's a "normal" stock android ROM available for the G3 anywhere. As much as I love the launchers ( and as much as I loathe Touchwiz), I really want to try out the "stock" Android..without any launchers. Just the one which Google gives.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is none.... because this is samsung device with touchwiz you can have stock 2.2 with vanilla android theme and launcher but thats is....
Yeah, but is there no ROM WITHOUT Touchwiz? I'm kinda sick of it and all the ROMs have an implementation of it.
Jazux is only partly right, there is already an alpha version of cyanogen mod, which is pure asop plus pure open source cyanogen mod features, and there will be an aosp gingerbread as well. Just look through the forum.
But this is not the place for such questions as this is the development section...
----------------------------------------
tapatalked
By AOSP u mean "vanilla Android"?
Thanks! Can u please post links?
cheekrox said:
By AOSP u mean "vanilla Android"?
Thanks! Can u please post links?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ARE YOU BLIND no offense but PLEASE use search tool!
FadeFx said:
Jazux is only partly right, there is already an alpha version of cyanogen mod, which is pure asop plus pure open source cyanogen mod features, and there will be an aosp gingerbread as well. Just look through the forum.
But this is not the place for such questions as this is the development section...
----------------------------------------
tapatalked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FadeFx is only partly right , the cyonagen mod is not vanilla android, it has many mods that normal "vanilla android" doesnt have
jazux said:
ARE YOU BLIND no offense but PLEASE use search tool!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it. And yeah, CM is still being tested. I need a stable one. Is there no Froyo AOSP?
cheekrox said:
Got it. And yeah, CM is still being tested. I need a stable one. Is there no Froyo AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is none, believe it already
cheekrox said:
Got it. And yeah, CM is still being tested. I need a stable one. Is there no Froyo AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, there isn't
If you hate Touchwiz that much then go into Root Explorer or Terminal or something, find the apk for Touchwiz and delete it. There you go.
But if he wants stock experience, can't he just install stock launcher and remove the touchwiz from root explorer? ive tried it.
Thats what i was saying! install that and see if u like it. if you prefer simplicity, then go for it. but TW launcher has its own advantages, like uninstalling the app right from the drawer!. i had installled the GB launcher, but found it to be too, u kno, simple...still LP for me is best. omg i can post in dev section yeeahh!!! finally!! haree, i know, i know
cheekrox said:
Got it. And yeah, CM is still being tested. I need a stable one. Is there no Froyo AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
some time back(maybe april-may) i saw a person who compiled froyo AOSP for g3 and he/she needed help to convert .img into rfs(no cwm back then)
try searching
and as FadeFx said we are getting gingerbread AOSP but i guess that wont be stable anytime soon
but if the gingerbread rumour is true then it'ld be a lot easier
cheekrox said:
Yeah, but is there no ROM WITHOUT Touchwiz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touchwiz is an essential part of the Samsung-provided ROMs, if you remove it, the system crashes, there are force close messages in every second or two even if you use another launcher.
Ah! So I'm pretty much stuck with TouchWiz on my G3 then? =/
cheekrox said:
Ah! So I'm pretty much stuck with TouchWiz on my G3 then? =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, as the others already wrote it, you can change the launcher to whatever you want after you installed a home manager, only thing that you can't uninstall Touchwiz. You can even close it with the home manager so it no more consumes any RAM or CPU time.
Ah! Thanks! =)

[Discussion Thread] About CM10.1 - CM10.2 for the Xperia Play!

Discussions for CM10.1 and CM10.2 for the Xperia Play. If something new is coming. All discussion goes here.
im really for your project.
i hope you fix everything
_____________
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
pedyvirus said:
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should stick with Ubuntu 13.04 or else Linux Mint 15
Because bbqlinux its hard to install some updates. Compiling gives alot of errors. I'm switching my OS on Ubuntu 13.04 by this friday
Hurreyyy
[email protected] very happy to hear from u about this great news.so many contributors and members felt shocked of removing ur previous post.but
TAHNKS TO U FROM ME AND FROM ALL OUR XPLAY MEMBERS.WE RESPECT U
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
CyberScopes said:
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later bro. Let me settle up some things first
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
crazymonkey05 said:
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. If can i will start from scratch
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
saqibkhan said:
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that you can not compete . You should create together---> it is better---> Have a good rom with kernel than 2 ragged rom with 2 kernel. But mike can work on rom and you can work on kernel This is just my opinion sorry for bad english!
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's the reason why we don't have 3.4 kernel and 4.3 ROM yet. It's because nobody wants to share work with others or work together on one kernel and one ROM. Anyway i wish you all luck.
hmmm.. unity is strength.. Xperia play is no more about Cosmic Dans Turbo Kernel.. or Lupus's Kernel.. or AOKP or CyanagenMod.. (I mean all this in a good way) we need a "ROM" 4.2/4.3 for Xperia Play and a "Kernel" for Xperia Play.. the brand, the dev, no matters no more.. and the way things are,, I really think dev's should team up to make one Good Rom.. and One Good Kernel.. cuz I don't think Xperia Play would last till Android 6.0 .. so just this device one good last push.. and see how things work out. Split work will only increase/duplicate work.. delay the ROM/Kernel and maybe the ROM would never get rid of bugs.
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree...hashy I'm sorry I can't really assist you as my play is my daily driver so all my stuff is on it.....but I'm rooting for you!!!
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see then
darkharbinger81 said:
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That what i was thinking just now. But nevermind.
[email protected] said:
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Against rule? Bro, Let it be now. I'll work on my way. I don't need any-one permission from now on

[DEVELEOPMENT][DISCUSSION]HTC Wildfire Buzz

As we discussed much in my CM10.1 thread I thought to make a discussion thread for further development.I hope this is not against forum rules and if please tell me and I'll change/delete it.
Rules:
-Don't ask noob question like: "How to root,...!"
-Don's spam this thread
-Only use this for development purpose
Now feel free to post everything about development for our HTC Buzz!
for cyanogenmod 10+ look at this ----> http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/12089/2/services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp
This is the commit that fixed screenshot, task previews and other openGL es related stuff in ICS
Just found out my cpu is 64-bit, so im installing ubuntu 13.10 64-bit and then syncing up CM10.1 to fix errors with you sasa
Thanks for the link and all the best while fixing bugs.Anyways yesterday my hard disk got broken so all my data is lost so my source is lost!
I need to sync it again now!
I will also begin now and then try to fix the bugs too!
Yeah this thread should be not deleted at all
Also I'm going to install ubuntu for my new laptop, now that I've got my own i can start developing even further more
And I'm going to start helping fixing bugs in cm9
Also i'll try make a new kernal for HTC buzz cm9
Stone. Cold said:
Yeah this thread should be not deleted at all
Also I'm going to install ubuntu for my new laptop, now that I've got my own i can start developing even further more
And I'm going to start helping fixing bugs in cm9
Also i'll try make a new kernal for HTC buzz cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel development is harder than you think... ive been trying this past week to update the kernel, no lck, i cant find the right sources to base the kernel on:/
faZevoLv said:
Kernel development is harder than you think... ive been trying this past week to update the kernel, no lck, i cant find the right sources to base the kernel on:/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How hard exactly? Then in that case, i'll still try. If no luck then
Yes, Kernel Development is harder than compiling ROMs.The first build is a pain.If it boots up it's pretty good.Then only adding the features is over.But if you don't have proper source like for the Buzz(We don't have 3.x Source), you have to search for alternate source.Like me I found a source from LG Optimus Me!
It has same Chipset as our Buzz and is also ARM-V6.So when we use our config of Buzz it should compile and boot up!
found a good kernel source as mentioned by you sasa ----> https://github.com/PecanCM/lge-kernel-pecan/tree/android-msm-3.0-jb
Ill try it after building PAC cm10
faZevoLv said:
found a good kernel source as mentioned by you sasa ----> https://github.com/PecanCM/lge-kernel-pecan/tree/android-msm-3.0-jb
Ill try it after building PAC cm10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
faZevoLv said:
found a good kernel source as mentioned by you sasa ----> https://github.com/PecanCM/lge-kernel-pecan/tree/android-msm-3.0-jb
Ill try it after building PAC cm10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this one I meant.Sorry for not giving the link but thanks that you mentioned.
Building PAC cm10 now!!!!
faZevoLv said:
Building PAC cm10 now!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the best, friend!
Waiting for it.But the name isn't PAC CM10, it's only PAC Jelly Bean
SasaKovacic said:
All the best, friend!
Waiting for it.But the name isn't PAC CM10, it's only PAC Jelly Bean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but its based on CM10, that's why I said it
Oh and I used a CM9 patch to fix task previews and other stuff, probably some speedup too!
faZevoLv said:
I know, but its based on CM10, that's why I said it
Oh and I used a CM9 patch to fix task previews and other stuff, probably some speedup too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good to know, also all is well and going good?
Stone. Cold said:
That's good to know, also all is well and going good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep nearly finished compiling Jellybean 4.1.2 should be ~3 times faster with my patch
faZevoLv said:
Yep nearly finished compiling Jellybean 4.1.2 should be ~3 times faster with my patch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Glad to know, also it will be the first ever PAC MAN rom
Thanks jord, everyone must appreciate your work
faZevoLv said:
Building PAC cm10 now!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is not better to make a port ? Is easier no ?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Pator57 said:
Is not better to make a port ? Is easier no ?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting jelly bean roms is much much much harder than ICS or GB!! They always reboot and bootloop with many errors:/
I built PAC and it boots!!!!!
but paranoid preferences don't work:/ I know how to fix it but ill have to recompile which will take another day:/

Temasek vs Archi vs Bliss cm12.1 5.1.1 LP ?

HEy everybody iam a little bit confused. i found these 3 famous rom developer. and iam not able to see any differences. Why there the 3 releases, why they dont wirk together. So there must be a difference right, but wich one? Is it possible to tell wich adaptation is the most developed?
Thanks everybody for sharing there experiences
twinko said:
HEy everybody iam a little bit confused. i found these 3 famous rom developer. and iam not able to see any differences. Why there the 3 releases, why they dont wirk together. So there must be a difference right, but wich one? Is it possible to tell wich adaptation is the most developed?
Thanks everybody for sharing there experiences
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest you avoid all these roms.... I personally tested all...
the best is the Team UB Rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3/development/rom-team-ub-rom-i9300-t2984986
87mpi said:
I suggest you avoid all these roms.... I personally tested all...
the best is the Team UB Rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3/development/rom-team-ub-rom-i9300-t2984986
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry but that looks good but its not an option because of that: "Due to server maintenance cost, they could not maintain several devices. Due to this, there will no longer be updates for our device. The thread is officially closed now"
And do you have some more informations, do you noticed some differences between Temasek ,Archi or Bliss?
I have the feeling most progress is going on at archis rom!
Yup archi's.. Man he is real genius. Rest it's your device your choice
Sent from my BE(a)ST.. Samsung Galaxy Note2
Archi's rom it's the best in my opinion. But temasek's is good too. Blisspop i don't like it.
Ariano Ângelo said:
Archi's rom it's the best in my opinion. But temasek's is good too. Blisspop i don't like it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
team ub is the way
87mpi said:
team ub is the way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tested it.
Ariano Ângelo said:
Archi's rom it's the best in my opinion. But temasek's is good too. Blisspop i don't like it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ariano Ângelo said:
Never tested it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest you try it
87mpi said:
I suggest you try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but for now I'll keep Archidroid 3.0.2. It's very stable.
Ariano Ângelo said:
Thanks, but for now I'll keep Archidroid 3.0.2. It's very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly I never installed the archidroid
I tested the Temasek and blisspop 5.1.1 , but also the resurrection remix , but the one I have now is the best among all the ones I tried definitely !
it means that I'll try it :good:
thanks
87mpi said:
honestly I never installed the archidroid
I tested the Temasek and blisspop 5.1.1 , but also the resurrection remix , but the one I have now is the best among all the ones I tried definitely !
it means that I'll try it :good:
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome . I only use this rom because I like to have a stable phone without problems, and i'll be using a cm12.1 based rom when Archidroid gets updated.
Ariano Ângelo said:
You're welcome . I only use this rom because I like to have a stable phone without problems, and i'll be using a cm12.1 based rom when Archidroid gets updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
unfortunately team ub's Rom will not be updated more .. now is a eol
87mpi said:
:good:
unfortunately team ub's Rom will not be updated more .. now is a eol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Temasek rom seems nice, you could test it
Ariano Ângelo said:
Temasek rom seems nice, you could test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried the Temasek , but gave me problems.. random fc .. sometimes disappeared the icone..etc ..
I also use boeffla kernel with this ROM and it's amazing
87mpi said:
I already tried the Temasek , but gave me problems.. random fc .. sometimes disappeared the icone..etc ..
I also use boeffla kernel with this ROM and it's amazing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boeffla kernel it's really good . But if you want to be updated try the new update. I read the thread and seems that the rom is much better, according to the comentaries.
Ariano Ângelo said:
Boeffla kernel it's really good . But if you want to be updated try the new update. I read the thread and seems that the rom is much better, according to the comentaries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're referring to Temasek ?
87mpi said:
you're referring to Temasek ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.

Need help testing this kernel.

Hi guys i need you to test the performance of this kernel i've made
ONLY DECEMBER CM12.1 NIGHTLIES COMPATIBLE
LINK
Please tell me how your Phone performs,if better or worse.
NOTE : I don't know if this is the right section as i'm not sure if this is actually "worth" putting in development section.(waiting for user evalutation)
I try
I can try your kernel but, it can boot??
And you dont have an moto e???
hetor99 said:
I can try your kernel but, it can boot??
And you dont have an moto e???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it boots.
I Have tested on mine and it's blazing fast.I Just wanted make sure it's the kernel and not the mods that i applied to the ROM ^^
The perform with your kernel is the same has cm 12.1 stock kernel and when i install your kernel my wifi dont work im using moke open source rom up to date with the cyanogenmod sources and you can add some cpu governors, faux sound control, simple gpu algorithm.
Cheez2553 said:
Hi guys i need you to test the performance of this kernel i've made
ONLY DECEMBER CM12.1 NIGHTLIES COMPATIBLE
LINK
Please tell me how your Phone performs,if better or worse.
NOTE : I don't know if this is the right section as i'm not sure if this is actually "worth" putting in development section.(waiting for user evalutation)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is a kernel, then dont create a normal thread. Create a DevDB project for testing it. Or I will make a DevDB project and give you the credits.
PoseidonKing said:
If it is a kernel, then dont create a normal thread. Create a DevDB project for testing it. Or I will make a DevDB project and give you the credits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it doesn't "reserve" being a project because this is just an experiment i made with a toolchain,also i'm not going to add any feature to it anytime soon.
yes it's working fine and make things better.
Overall a decent kernel to try on.
-z3r0- said:
yes it's working fine and make things better.
Overall a decent kernel to try on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks i really appreciate your feedback.
hey man can you add a feature list or what tweaks it does.
That'll be awesome.
-z3r0- said:
hey man can you add a feature list or what tweaks it does.
That'll be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel posted here just features latest sabermod toolchain instead of Android Stock.
I'm going to work on this when i have time,i'll create a thread and provide you optimized CM and fast kernel..time is my enemy tho
Cheez2553 said:
The kernel posted here just features latest sabermod toolchain instead of Android Stock.
I'm going to work on this when i have time,i'll create a thread and provide you optimized CM and fast kernel..time is my enemy tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck with that and take your time bruh :good:

Categories

Resources