hi guys i am want to buy a tablet for gaming and I was seeing some videos on youtube and i saw that the tf300t quadrant score is a 1000 less than the nexus 7!!!! why? they have the same cpu and gpu!!!!! I think?
The transformer line of tablets have problems with slow I/O speeds. If you install a custom ROM however, the I/O speeds do get better as well as overall performance
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
Thanks
Thanks for the help!!!! and i will not forget those words
If someone wants put something go head that will help me a lot!!!!!!! (sorry for my english)
Nexus 7 runs on 1.5Ghz while TF300 runs on 1.3Ghz
Actually have two benchmarks
Nexus 7 has a custom rom, tf300 is stock without root and so on (see attachment)
though for some reason tf300 has better score in database i/o than nexus 7
Thanks but you are wrong
Thanks but the nexus 7 and tf300t have the same clock speeds, 1.2 with the four cores and 1.3 with a single core.
But thanks anyway
AW: TF300T is slower than the nexus 7
GumarGamer said:
Thanks but the nexus 7 and tf300t have the same clock speeds, 1.2 with the four cores and 1.3 with a single core.
But thanks anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I looked at the nexus and it was at 1,3ghz - thought it might be because it's another ROM but then I looked it up and found out, that it is normally at 1,3ghz
My mistake
So now I ran a benchmark with the nexus 7 again and it tunrs out, that database i/o is much better than on tf300. Though now with 1,3ghz it's 12651 points
Gesendet von meinem ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T mit Tapatalk 2
Thanks for the scores
thanks for the scores and i am glad to help too
Although I don't think Benchmark say smth about performance I can say I got 15'600 on Baked ROM (with CPU OC to 1.5 Ghz and default GPU OC of 520 mhz) - so if you decide to get a TF300, you just have to know that a custom ROM is a must have in everybody's opinion that has ever flashed one :laugh:
OK.... Here ya go. This is my TF300T. So much for a slow tablet. LOL!!
EDIT: FYI, this is running CleanROM.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@wetbiker
Yeah but that is overclocked to 1.8GHz! I value the battery life very much on a tablet and that kind of overclock is going to have quite an impact.
Wetbiker7
Which kernel you use?
Thaks
Evan_ said:
@wetbiker
Yeah but that is overclocked to 1.8GHz! I value the battery life very much on a tablet and that kind of overclock is going to have quite an impact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, having my dock comes in very handy. The added battery life is a plus. I don't run at 1.8 all the time because it's not needed. I usually keep it at either 1.5 or 1.6. That's more than enough to do what I need to do. I've got benchmark scores in the 16000s running at 1.6. Battery life at that speed isn't bad at all.
z1022 said:
Wetbiker7
Which kernel you use?
Thaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was using one of the 700 kernels in dbdags kernels installer. The kernels for the 700 that clock up to 1.8 will give you those good scores.
Also, I don't run my tablet at 1.8 all the time. Usually just for testing. I normally run at 1.5 or 1.6 because it's all I need. The tablet performs great even at the lower speeds with absolutely no lag whatsoever. CleanROM is just an all around great ROM.
Sent from my LG-LG855 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
wetbiker7
Thanks, which version cleanrom you use? ODEX or DEODEX
z1022 said:
wetbiker7
Thanks, which version cleanrom you use? ODEX or DEODEX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Deodexed.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD
wetbiker7 said:
Deodexed.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's deodexed and what's odexed?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T
nooktablet said:
What's deodexed and what's odexed?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Google and look it up. There's a lot on the subject.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD
Related
I heard the Linaro changes are being pushed, I checked and it looks like it may take a little more time.
basically the Linaro builds use a toolchain that give android builds up to a 30%* performance increase
If any devs want to take a look at it, It's in gerrit (I think this is it)
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/17380/
EDIT: Galaxy Nexus version's reported benchmarks
I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
mikeymop said:
I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I calculated based on panda-board FPS average results, but you're probably right
EDIT: yep, it was 30, I'm bad at math
Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044
bedalus said:
Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Galaxy Nexus ROM has this and they say the UI overall is faster.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/com...ld_optimizations_that_can_make_ics_30/c4y97ef
Could be placebo, who knows.
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is real, I have a feeling it doesn't respond to benchmarks. As most know, benchmarks are not real world tests.
e.g. deleting an OpenGLes lib to make benchmarks show a different score.
bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S
Wow if this implemented on our phones we will not be needing another core
Sent from my Nexus S®
Oh wait, found this:
http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/06...k-android-to-shame-on-ti-pandaboard-omap4430/
...with the same video.
Looks promising!
Slim ics rom and kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium
What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
tchaari said:
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right! Bedalus will have this sorted soon enough! I'm sure it will be added to the sticky soon after
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
according to Gerrit, CM is having some troubles with compatibility, and they are sorting that out right now.
italia0101 said:
What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
koax88 is using 0xbench
koax88 said:
Slim ics rom and kernel
View attachment 1119576
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to compare it to a GNEX, not using Nexus S. GNEX has to push more pixels and so on to the 4.65" 720p screen comparing to Nexus S with 4.0" display. I believe that would put a strain on the CPU?
I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®
The rom, good sir
mixtapes08 said:
I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. We've already seen that there's no significant benefit from linaro 'optimized' kernel builds. Should be interesting.
....memoirs of a flash addict.
CM9 nightly implemented some Linaro code in the build you can see in change log I did 2 quadrant scores at 1.4ghz & got total score of 1800 I then flashed the Anidroid hardened kernel b.13 which was build using linaro tool chain & got a score of 2500 phone did seem a little quicker but nothing crazy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Ran RL Benchmark and Androbench - Is it just me or do these numbers not make a lot of sense? They seem downright horrific or am I misinterpreting?
It would seem that there is virtually no significant improvement in performance with Jellybean as far as I can see. At least on these tests.
For Reference and pre-jellybean comparsion consult this article from Android Police:
http://www.androidpolice.com/tags/rl-benchmark/
Could some of the benchmarking experts around here comment?
Androbench Run on my TF300 after Jellybean:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Androbench Ranking for my TF300:
As I understand it:
Random Write: Higher is Better
Random Read: Higher is Better
Sequential Read: Higher is Better
Sequential Write: Higher is Better
Here's RL Bench from mine - not rooted - completely stock
Wtf I'm on jelly bean and look at mine
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
jeffbud98 said:
Wtf I'm on jelly bean and look at mine
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf indeed. Will re-run.
Edit: Getting same basic results the second time.
Wait a minute - something's fishy here - your results don't look the same as mine - mine say "This Device" but yours says "Your Device" - so if you are legitimately running the same test and version, why is your result chart phrased differently? In fact, the entire diagram is different, color code, bar width, everything. In fact, my results actually say RL Benchmark in the upper right - yours doesn't.
Pretty lame if intentional
I am running: RL Benchmark SQLite Performance v1.3. Please verify you have the same version.
He's running antutu.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I don't think "Project Butter" is fully included in CM10 roms.
Wait for a official release before doing benches. Its like trying to bench a Full version with a Beta. Not the same
toxicdust said:
I don't think "Project Butter" is fully included in CM10 roms.
Wait for a official release before doing benches. Its like trying to bench a Full version with a Beta. Not the same
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seem to have missed the official JB update that Asus released in the US for the Tf300.
Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk
I'm running ICS (4.0.3) and ran these tests. I cold booted, opened task manager and shut down everything then ran the test each time. No widgets on any screens, no other apps running. Here is RL benchmarks results.
Did another cold boot, clear out running apps and test. Here's antutu.
All tests were done in "performance" mode.
This is a brand new tab, 2 days old. Beginning to really wish i had bought a galaxy tab instead. These warranty issues suck.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
There's an IO discussion going on in the TF700 forum and whether JB will make things signficantly better. Here's a chart showing how the TF300 (post-JB) stacks up against the Note 10.1 and a Teg3 One X based on their respective AndroBench scores. The Note and One X are both stock running 4.0.4. Thought you might find it interesting.
Hello everyone
I started this thread to see our lovely note 2 performance in benchmark apps, please mention if u running on Stock ROM or Custom Rom
here's mine, Stock Not Rooted 4.1.1:
AnTuTu:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant:
Vellamo:
NenaMark2:
Hope to see ur results
Completely Stock 4.1.2
^^^^
I see an improvement in 4.1.2, browser and graphics, 1000 more points in Quadrant, about 80 in Vellamo
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Devashish Lodh said:
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why the low score !!!
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with benchmark results, benchmarks offer very rough results for the estimated performance of your device. If you run any benchmark twice in a row, under the same conditions, it would give 2 completely varrying results, which clearly shows that results are very unreliable and doesn't necessarily mirror to real world performance.
My old Motorola atrix 4g which is a dual core tegra 2 android device overclocked to 1.4GHz used to score an average of 6000 on quadrant, which is pretty much around what most people get on our quad core Notes, but if you compare both phones in terms of real world performance its not even a competition, the note 2 feels 3 generations ahead.
This is mine..
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Here's mine.
4.1.2 DLL4....XEF
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - Jelly Bean 4.1.1
Quadrant:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
AnTuTu:
Perseus Kernel
CPU: 1800Mhz, 1250mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
Geekbench 2:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
@ cyber.bg
Awesome scores
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change your kernel or Overclock at your own risk.
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
haldi15 said:
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Godlike!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Some of these scores are just too good to be true... :good:
Souai said:
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well on antutu this new dll4 rom version raised my gpu scores a lot. So they must have done something right. Also on quadrant my fps went from 40 -> 60 with new drivers. With stock kernel and wicked rom.
Mashari_F said:
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didnt know disabling power saver would boost my cell godlike!!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
wtf!
Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk 2
: what is a stable kernel to overclock my N7 to 1.8 GHz or 2.0 ghz and will work well with my stock kernel .
I am using now motley v3+ kernel but the maximum frequency is 1.6 ghz
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
With the trinity kernel you can over clock up to 1.7, also there's a faux kernel that you can go up to 1.7 but its useless anyway, your tablet won't perform better because you over clock it.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
I guess you just really want to kill the tablet, huh? Even if it could clock that high without permanently damaging the silicon, you'd be looking at it being extremely unstable.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
On 4.1 there was a kernel that let you OC to 2.1GHz but that hasn't been updated to 4.2 and proally never will. On 4.1.2 with CNC and That kernel I got like 7000 in quadrant
Sent from my Nexus 4 @1.72 GHz on Stock 4.2.2
It performs better already since I oc to 1.6 ghz!
Why you say that
Sent from my Xperia Z using xda app-developers app
fish droid said:
It performs better already since I oc to 1.6 ghz!
Why you say that
Sent from my Xperia Z using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better in performance of course. Over clocking the tablet can deplete it's life span. Battery life will take a huge hit too.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
For me overclocking is totally useless. You won´t recognise a difference between no oc and oc... only in benchmarks, but your battery is draining faster and it´s getting hot
Curlie said:
For me overclocking is totally useless. You won´t recognise a difference between no oc and oc... only in benchmarks, but your battery is draining faster and it´s getting hot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
overclocking to higher frequencies will make the battery drain faster and it will get it hot but I only overclocked 300 MHz to reach 1.6 ghz and it's perfect ,it operates normally and it never got hot . I also changed the GPU frequency to 533 by trickster mod .
scream4cheese said:
Better in performance of course. Over clocking the tablet can deplete it's life span. Battery life will take a huge hit too.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is partially right I think it will effect the battery when the kernel request those extra 300 MHZ but it will also save the battery since I made the minimum frequency to 100 MHZ .
But why do you do it? For me there´s no notieceable difference.. only in benchmarks and i don´t care about benchmarks. For me franco kernel is best
fish droid said:
It performs better already since I oc to 1.6 ghz!
Why you say that
Sent from my Xperia Z using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a principle called the law of diminishing returns and it applies perfectly to this situation. The reason that kernel devs don't include higher frequency steps is that there is no real benefit. At higher frequencies, you introduce lag, random reboots, boot loops and general instability. Performance and frequency are not a linear corollary. Additionally, you exponentially shorten the life of the hardware by clocking too high. 1.6 is safe for most, 1.7 for some, and 1.8 for very few.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
najaboy said:
There's a principle called the law of diminishing returns and it applies perfectly to this situation. The reason that kernel devs don't include higher frequency steps is that there is no real benefit. At higher frequencies, you introduce lag, random reboots, boot loops and general instability. Performance and frequency are not a linear corollary. Additionally, you exponentially shorten the life of the hardware by clocking too high. 1.6 is safe for most, 1.7 for some, and 1.8 for very few.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your reply is the most logical one since everyone does not know what they are talking about but I was I just asking for experimental purpose not for permanent use .
what are the kernels that will allow me to reach 1.9GHZ or 2.0GHZ on stock rom 4.2.2?
Curlie said:
But why do you do it? For me there´s no notieceable difference.. only in benchmarks and i don´t care about benchmarks. For me franco kernel is best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
franco kernel is stable . and also motley very safe and stable . and ofcource there is a difference "curlie" there is no lagging at all even when I customize my nexus with a different launcher . I don't care about benchmark also its irrelevant with the actual performance but sure there is a big difference .
but why do you choose franco kernel ?
IRX120 said:
On 4.1 there was a kernel that let you OC to 2.1GHz but that hasn't been updated to 4.2 and proally never will. On 4.1.2 with CNC and That kernel I got like 7000 in quadrant
Sent from my Nexus 4 @1.72 GHz on Stock 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get on 4.2.2 7000 scores.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
My man, you seem hell bent on frying your n7! Lol
Sent from my cell phone telephone....
Tommy-Geenexus said:
I get on 4.2.2 7000 scores.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A bit over 7000 Quadrant score on 4.2.2 here too, OC to 1.6 and still able to UV about 100 across the board and no different in stability, maybe i'm lucky one who got variant 3 of Tegra 3 here.
What I got from OC my device? It's run much more smother than when i'm at 1.3 like in facebook app for example at 1.3 I'm not able to scroll through feed really smooth but at 1.6 it's really smooth.
Concern about negative hit to battery life? I'm notice a little hit here as i'm get about 7 hours screen-time at 1.3 and about 6.5 hours at 1.6 and to me that acceptable, maybe due to UV that make it not much different.
Heat? A little lower if not the same temperature as when it's running at 1.3 again due to under voltage I think.
But however this is just my personal experience.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
If you can build from source, just add in the frequencies to the tegra3_dvfs.c and other related files. But due to several obvious reasons mentioned already in this thread, I would never do that ever.
Franco Kernel FTW!
Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
MRobbo80 said:
Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
kossiewossie said:
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a slightly higher score out of the box not by much but still an awesome tablet!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-hBmPylPQw
Just posted to compare. Taken from Mi Pad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
rene130313 said:
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when I played around I am hitting more the 43.5k
44k with dalvik, 42k with art.
Not sure whether nvidia messed up art or did a good job of optimising dalvik, but it's the first time I've seen it score higher.
Sent from my Xperia Z using Tapatalk
Just remembered when using xposed framework art does not work will have to uninstall and see the difference
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet
Stock Rom, Rooted
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new Antutu v5 has higher scores for gpu.. so its about 10k points higher then antutu v4 benchmarks.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Stock Rom, Rooted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Unjustified Dev said:
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not unlocked and i dont have cwm installed, only rooted via towel-root.
I want to keep the tablet stock.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks will have a look.
MRobbo80 said:
Thanks will have a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi have tested kernel and works great! I get an extra 1.5k total of 44.5k, normally around 43k give or take this is not version 5. Please stick around we need some great devs!!
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Can fastboot boot recovery images but I've but tried a kernel yet.
Tempted to start working on some kernels for this device, will see how my time pans out with new job
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i flashed cwm via flashify, then rebooted into cwm and flashed the kernel.
EDIT: AnTuTu v5 56953 Points now, a little higher.