Related
Hey saw this over at GSMarena the HTC D'HD has been benchmarked with neocore and quadrant and the quadrant results are amazing much higher than the N1 have a look here http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_desire_hd_gets_benchmarked_its_rom_ported_to_the_hd2-news-1941.php
Here are other benchmarks: http://www.areamobile.de/handys/2591-htc-desire-hd/testbericht (german):
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Samsung Galaxy S
Sunspider Benchmark 16321 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 70,7 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 871 pts
Apple iPhone 4
Sunspider Benchmark 10804 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 85,4 Punkte
Quadrant Benchmark -
Oh yeah thanks Seems strange though GSMarena's model made almost 2000 (1974) in Quadrant Where as areamobile's HD only reached 1675 which is alot of difference because my overclocked Froyo Hero will only reach 294 which is the difference
oprisnik said:
Here are other benchmarks: http://www.areamobile.de/handys/2591-htc-desire-hd/testbericht (german):
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Samsung Galaxy S
Sunspider Benchmark 16321 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 70,7 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 871 pts
Apple iPhone 4
Sunspider Benchmark 10804 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 85,4 Punkte
Quadrant Benchmark -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on that website it says that the htc desire hd has a front camera has it ?
Does it ?? i thinbk it doesnt but ...
faddys123 said:
on that website it says that the htc desire hd has a front camera has it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They made a mistake i suppose. It does not have a front cam.
i think they run quadrant more than one time to achieve these score
Thats excellent, even with HTC Sense enabled.
Also ALOT
eXDee said:
Thats excellent, even with HTC Sense enabled.
Also ALOT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep , imagine what some awesome devs could do with this
~1600 in quadrant seems resonable for the desire HD ..... anyone worrying it will be a beast ...... one more thing
768MB RAM !!!
Quadrant scores are higher directly after reboot.
On lagfixed SGS it can be a difference similiar to this when comparing directly after boot results with results of some hours later.
I love to see all the SGS users coming on this board saying this beast is not gonna be that much better, this definitely proves otherwise, just accept it,
The SGS has rubbish battery life, crap build quality, non existant GPS... The best thing about the phone is the S-AMOLED screen, and thats it!
Desire HD FTW
lol
JD
Just For Comparison (the first SGS benchmark looks to have been on 2.1 so not a fair test)
---------------------------------------
GalaxyS (GT-i9000) on latest 2.2 build |
---------------------------------------
Sunspider Benchmark --- 8085 ms
Google V8 --- 259 pts
Quadrant --- 1005 pts
---------------------------------------
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looking at that the desire HD is slightly ahead of the Galaxy S. But only time will tell only a few days to go now :-D eeek
The whole world is going to see either SGS froyo can beat nexus one with froyo on stock rom without lagfixes...
Out of the box or stock is a point for any phone, how much it can be pushed by developers is another point.. The one that wins on both point is the winner..
Hopefully samsung will do it right this time..
I have a GalaxyS atm and the H/W is top notch and i cant fault it ... but samsungs S/W team have a long way to go befor they are any real thret to HTC . . .
Apache14 said:
I have a GalaxyS atm and the H/W is top notch and i cant fault it ... but samsungs S/W team have a long way to go befor they are any real thret to HTC . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed.. SGS is a superb powerhouse.. it lacks on userXP and UI.. Eventhough HTC does not grant phone with the best specs, but they balanced it up with a great software.. and the devs love HTC too
More results
img545.imageshack.us/img545/9767/benchmarkpro.jpg
youtube.com/watch?v=BJWOznNUfow
So is it true that froyo doesn't really have much different effect on SGS? Does anyone have a picture showing quadrant result for the Desire HD and SGS froyo stock?
Hakimy said:
So is it true that froyo doesn't really have much different effect on SGS? Does anyone have a picture showing quadrant result for the Desire HD and SGS froyo stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem here is Samsung totally cocked up the Froyo and yesterday removed it from the Scandinavian servers.
Part of the removal was they were not happy with the reg-hack but a lot is to do with Froyo underperforming on the SGS.
Samsung are letting the SGS down badly.
Beards said:
The problem here is Samsung totally cocked up the Froyo and yesterday removed it from the Scandinavian servers.
Part of the removal was they were not happy with the reg-hack but a lot is to do with Froyo underperforming on the SGS.
Samsung are letting the SGS down badly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung let the SGS down from the start - fix the lag, GPS, some other things I've forgotten, and you would have a great phone. They got the hard stuff right, and all the easier stuff completely wrong.
Hi,
Now a days everyday there is new ROM for Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000 released.
It is very difficult for a person to choose one from the list.
So, I started the thread for discussion of ROM & KERNEL Performance, experience, Problems and Troubleshooting advises.
Participate and share your experience for each ROM you use.
Submit your Quadrant Score with ROM & KERNEL Details.
Thanks & Regards,
-niemesh
Doctorz ROM
I am using Doctorz ROM which I found very good and stable with good inbuilt applications
1. What is KERNAL?
2. Why use Quadrant to measure performance?
Sent from my GT-I9000
KERNEL is a bridge between applications and the actual data processing done at the hardware level
Quadrant Standard is used for measuring performance of android mobile.
sry but by using quadrant to verify a rom speed you are disqualifying yourself
i din't say quadrant used to verify rom speed. I told that it is a standard for measuring Android mobile speed. being specific quadrant is benchmark for mobile performance for data writing, reading, 2D, 3D, etc.
I included quadrant in this post as the quadrant scores are different from rom to rom due to its data processing ability.
Quadrant is a random number generator, useless. there are other bench tools around but i dont really care about those tools. as long as my SGS performs for me fast and smooth i dont care about any bench results.
JVT kernels are similar to each other. so suggest Semaphore, Galaxian or TalonDev. me using last one.
JVT rom is up to you and your theme choice. all are fast and smooth. the more its customized the more problems you can get. I use almost stock. all working great and fast even battery life is good.
Results in Google Docs Spreadsheet
All ICS ROMs Benchmarked
Any regular visitors to this thread can't have failed to notice the big changes in the spreadsheet. In particular I've been studying the effect of the kernel the ROM developer includes. If you look at column H, you will see whether I recommend flashing another kernel to improve performance at stock speeds.
REMEMBER: Performance is not everything! Many custom kernels provide extra features!
If you do decide to switch kernels, and only desire stock speeds and a reduced feature set, I recommend two kernels in this post.
If you are new to this stuff read this.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
#1st place: Pixel ROM 1.72
#2nd place: CyberGR-MOD|NS.NGN ICS v10 HYBRID
#3rd place: MIUI Catalyst 2.4.6
#4th place: AOSP+ N.5
#5th place: [MIUI][2.4.6] Oodie pRiMe rOcket fUeled
Where do I find all these wonderful ROMs?
Their XDA threads are all linked in the table, so click through to discover each ROM's feature set, included apps, theme, and evidence of good karma!
Looking for a Gingerbread ROM? Try this.
Where did all your other benchmarks go?
Kernel Features & Benchmarks: this thread
Battery drain: this thread
CPU Governors and I/O Schedulers: this thread
Power Saving Governors: this thread
Thanks to all the developers.
Testing Methodology
Each ROM is clean installed, allowed its own default settings, then all benchmark software is installed and run once the system is settled. I also perform one screen off screen on, just out of habbit (this used to resolve a graphics bug in gingerbread, which I'm not even sure exists in ICS). All results are recorded in the spreadsheet. Then I restart in recovery, wipe cache and dalvic (thanks morfic for dalvic wiper) and install morfic's T132-I kernel. Reboot, use nstools to select performance (default I/O scheduler for morfic's kernel is deadline). Reperform all benchmarks, recording them in the spreadsheet. The calculation for the overall CPU RAM I/O and GRAPHICS scores is identical to the one I use in my kernel benchmarking spreadsheet. Please refer to that thread for more detail. However, there is one difference. Quadrant behaves very differently in different ROMs depending on what graphics tweaks they incorporate. As such, no Quadrant scores are used in this ROM benchmarking study. For more details, see under 'Graphics' below.
The final step was to average out the results of both kernel scores, and ranking on that basis. Some would say that they are best ranked by looking at T132 scores only. I would say that is a fair point, and definitely worth consideration.
There are two reasons I incorporate the default kernel score:
1) Overall scores have a worst case scenario accuracy of within 2% of the true mean due to variability in the benchmarks (more detail on how I obtain this figure is available in my kernel benchmarking thread). For normally distributed data (which we can safely assume these benchmarks produce) averaging two sets of results will result in doubling the accuracy to within 1% of the true mean, making the ranking more reliable.
2) Combining the default kernel Scores for ROMs that used a poor performing kernel, or selected bad governor/scheduler combinations by default will suffer as a consequence. These problems can be solved if the user flashes their own preferred kernel and/or adjusts the kernel settings. However, many new users will not perform this step. For that reason, I want to give a score that at least somewhat reflects the performance as the developer intended.
-Graphics
One of the early findings is selecting force GPU rendering in the developer options improves 2D performance, in Quadrant only. Also, and only in Quadrant, 3D performance can be improved by deleting or moving /system/lib/egl/libGLES_android.so using root explorer or equivalent. These tweaks/hacks do not seem to affect other benchmarks in the slightest.
Because of the bizarre effects of these tweaks on Quadrant scores, I have removed them from the formula that calculates the overall GFX score, and this in turn impacts the overall average score. In short, it makes comparing each ROM's score fairer.
You can see evidence of how the graphics tweaks make Quadrant behave differently at the bottom of the spreadsheet, highlighted in light red. The host ROM for this particular comparison was DianXin or DX ROM for short. This is a reference to a post I make in DX ROMs thread, where I first decide that removing Quadrant is the best option: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22323688&postcount=194
-Android 4.0.1
These ROMs (at the bottom of the spreadsheet, highlighted in light red) were based on early maguro ports provided by koush. I have left them in, because although they are difficult to compare to 4.0.3 builds with the correct drivers and whatnot, they do compare to each other in one important respect: the kernel. One is stock, the other is built by eugene373 (galaxy nexus/nexus s dev.) Using eugene373's kernel, CPU, I/O, and Graphics were all raised to a high standard that is on a par, or above some of the current ROMs. This goes to show that a customised kernel can offer great benefits, even on a ported ROM.
-Android 4.0.4
As of the 5th of February, my table contains all the ICS ROMs that are listed in the XDA forums. There was only one 4.0.4 version at the time, and this was the best performing in the benchmarks. When the source code is released, I'm sure many ROMs will update. At this point they will benefit from increased RAM scores and javascript performance. If all the ROMs scores improve by the same proportion, the rankings will not be affected. I will attempt to included major releases, but I will not reperform these tests every time there is a new nightly.
Reserved 4
Reserved 3
Thanks
I was waiting for this
It might lead to troll wars though
By the way, i dont see Pete ICS rom in there, im using it.
Ibn Saeed said:
Thanks
I was waiting for this
It might lead to troll wars though
By the way, i dont see Pete ICS rom in there, im using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, and no troll wars please y'all.
Don't you think "popularity" is going a little too far? It will definitely lead to fights...all the devs are good and I don't think prominence is a good indicator of a good rom
But it's up to you
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Personally, benchmarks are very misleading... Some of the most stable and well developed roms don't get the greatest scores because they weren't made with benchmarks in mind.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Another great work! Thanks
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Don't you think "popularity" is going a little too far? It will definitely lead to fights...all the devs are good and I don't think prominence is a good indicator of a good rom
But it's up to you
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just remember, popular doesnt mean better. but to get angry at the truth(whatever it might be) is just silly. its lies that you should be upset with.
Where's Peter Alfonso's ROM? Bugless Beast is a mainstream rom, second only to Cyanogenmod in scope and breadth.. The ROM thread is in the General forum, because he links to his page at Rootzwiki, but it's a more prominent ROM than many you've listed.
Please include it in the benchmarking as well.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1430170
you didn't add and test this one
please add pete ics bugless beast.
Omissions fixed!
UPDATE: kwiboo's project removed, was an SDK port. So so tired now, got to sleep. Tomorrow begin again with Brainmaster's tweaked ICS
Which kernel is used to make the tests?
-----
Forget It...
"I'll be benchmarking them twice with whatever kernel they come with, and then with morfic's bare boned T132"
biotecsoul said:
Which kernel is used to make the tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the op.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
u could also add overnite battery drainage column with sync on or somethin like that, if not overnite then a period of 2 hrs idle .. how much does it drain ..
Holy **** man, what would it be if the NS comunity didnt have you??
Thumbs up!!!!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
thegtfusion said:
Holy **** man, what would it be if the NS comunity didnt have you??
Thumbs up!!!!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, that makes me feel good. Wait, Benchmarks > XDA thread > Positive XDA user feedback > Dopamine release = Addiction to benchmarking? Time to join crackflashers anonymous...
mathkid95 said:
Don't you think "popularity" is going a little too far? It will definitely lead to fights...all the devs are good and I don't think prominence is a good indicator of a good rom
But it's up to you
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it would lead to fights between devs, well hopefully not. I can see users arguing stuff more than devs.
Benchmarks aren't that good anways.
BTW, your kernel sucks!!!!
Just kidding been running smoothly since I started using it the other day
-----------
Thanks for the ratings system. Looks nice!
Placeholder for showing ur benchmark results as soon as this legendary phone is released and has roms.
Guys what is the best ROM with the highest benchmark score until now?
Januh said:
Guys what is the best ROM with the highest benchmark score until now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe Cyanogen, it has a lot of Tweks
Aurora ICS is also good
Xperia style is dam good but crashes in some games
MIUI i don't like the appearance...
Perhaps jelly beans！