[Q] Color Depth - A7 General

I am running Dexter's 1.3 mod
Is there a way I can use the 24 bit color depth by default.
It seems like everything is in 16 bit.
I get bad color banding issues. Videos look horrible.

somethingnull said:
I am running Dexter's 1.3 mod
Is there a way I can use the 24 bit color depth by default.
It seems like everything is in 16 bit.
I get bad color banding issues. Videos look horrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same issue, I was thinking it was a physical limitation of the device, or the fact that I had down sampled my movies so they would play on my Evo. If there is a way to increase the color depth it would definitely score a few extra points for this pad in my book.

netstat_EVO said:
I have the same issue, I was thinking it was a physical limitation of the device, or the fact that I had down sampled my movies so they would play on my Evo. If there is a way to increase the color depth it would definitely score a few extra points for this pad in my book.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine looks pretty crappy too...

Related

First impressions of my Evo 4G

I found a killer deal on a evo 4g from google I\O. I paid $300 and they where sealing from $600 to $800 in my area. I have a nexus one and I have to say i am loving the evo 4g. Everything is better. I am sold that is is diffidently a class above any other smartphone I have used. I thought I might like the bigger screen and better touch sensor over the nexus one but the rest would be the same. Its not at all. The quality and design is awesome. I feel in love instantly with this phone. Service is great no 3g dropping issue like my N1. No problem with screen or buttons. I would diffidently recommend this phone! Here is some pics.
Good for you!!
I like the side by side compare with the Nexus. Thx.
I can't wait to get mine on June 4th!
brightness looks great but there is a color difference in the photos.
Aridon said:
brightness looks great but there is a color difference in the photos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes the whites are better on the evo but the color is crisper on the N1. Just by a little bit but the colors look different because i think the n1 colors are off a little. Look how the white looks pinkish gray. Many people have reported pinkish hue on the n1. The nexus's amoled screen also has reports of burn ins and dead pixels.
can u input 720p movies or video to the supersonic SD card and what format does it use to play movies or video?
GHOST99K said:
can u input 720p movies or video to the supersonic SD card and what format does it use to play movies or video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have transformer 2 in blue ray that I have converted to 720p and 800 x 480 in both mp4 and avi. They are ready for testing but it will take some time to put them on sd card. I will copy them over tonight and test out Friday.
thanx let us know on the quality please
shep211 said:
I have transformer 2 in blue ray that I have converted to 720p and 800 x 480 in both mp4 and avi. They are ready for testing but it will take some time to put them on sd card. I will copy them over tonight and test out Friday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What bitrate or quality setting did you use.
P_Dub_S said:
What bitrate or quality setting did you use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Handbrake
800x480 = 800 auto aspect = max resolution for are phone
720p = 1280 auto aspect (For testing 720p through hdmi cable. Dont have cable yet)
1500 bitrate
double take
65%
Sweet I already started encoding some of my Blu-rays as well in anticipation for when I get mine.
I just hit the Iphone preset then changed the width to 800 and checked the keep aspect ratio. Avatar was still 3.2GB
P_Dub_S said:
Sweet I already started encoding some of my Blu-rays as well in anticipation for when I get mine.
I just hit the Iphone preset then changed the width to 800 and checked the keep aspect ratio. Avatar was still 3.2GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol mine was 1.7 gb and I think I messed up on it. My zune hd is 320x240 and is 2.4 gb. I will redo it tonight.
Lucky you! I paid $550. It gets here today. Excited.
I tested video playback and it works great. I will test out 720p streaming to 42 inch 1080p tv tonight. It will take all day to get the 8gb 720p video on my evo.
Compared to the Nexus...
- How much better is sunlight readability?
- Do you find yourself needing to use two hands much more often due to the size?
- Is the external speaker louder or softer?
Thanks
ohhh man never mind on inputing 720p videos cuz its gonna take out whole lotta space from the SD card.
ministersin said:
Lucky you! I paid $550. It gets here today. Excited.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congrats! Hey I'm in Austin too and would love to hear your thoughts on Sprint 3G/4G with the EVO. Please report back.
I've been able to play high bitrate videos (720p) on my Evo just fine. The only problem I've seen is that when the fps is at 30... it doesn't play. 24 and 25 fps works fine. Can anyone else verify or deny?
karnovaran said:
Compared to the Nexus...
- How much better is sunlight readability?
- Do you find yourself needing to use two hands much more often due to the size?
- Is the external speaker louder or softer?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 The evo is 30 to 40% better in sunlight.
2 When I pick it up yes (due to fear of dropping it) but feels great in one hand. I hold it the same way I do my n1.
3 I think the sound is way better then my n1.
4 The veiwing angle is better on the n1 but not a real issue.
how is the overall snappiness as compared to the n1? I know they have the same snapdragon, but does the evo seem any faster?
edit:
i see u have froyo on your n1.... does that make it blow the current evo with 2.1 out of the water? noob here... thanks for the insight!
cmart4 said:
how is the overall snappiness as compared to the n1? I know they have the same snapdragon, but does the evo seem any faster?
edit:
i see u have froyo on your n1.... does that make it blow the current evo with 2.1 out of the water? noob here... thanks for the insight!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With 2.1 vs 2.2 there is not a big difference in daily use. In linpack (benchmarking) yes 2.2 wins. If I open browser the evo come up first by .5 seconds. Not a big difference but it does feel faster overall.

NoDo issues/comments

So NoDo is here at last....seems way faster and much better than pre-NoDo.
Things I've noticed that I haven't seen publicised -
Headphone button now hangs up a call, didn't used to.
Display driver seems worse for some pages (WPCentral page, Bing search pages - noticeable banding, even where there didn't used to be).
Switch from WiFi to non-WiFi much smoother (I used to have particular problems with this
Anyone noticed anything else or got the same issue with the Display driver that I have?
All in all a big fan but will look forward to any further driver updates that might get the display working to it's Amoled best!
- mine not saving camera setting such as wide dynamic range or antishake, also video resolution is not saved
But this were also in old soft
no problems here. everything seems to be improved
J-A-J-O said:
- mine not saving camera setting such as wide dynamic range or antishake, also video resolution is not saved
But this were also in old soft
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a feature. Microsoft is considering allowing the settings to be saved.
Am I alone with the display banding (really noticeable if you press the search button - the Bing 'Wallpaper' used to be really high resolution but now looks pants)?
DatDereX1 said:
That's a feature. Microsoft is considering allowing the settings to be saved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering? They better allow it because it's the most frustrating part of WP7 for me. I want it in 720 as soon as I go into video mode!
gc48067 said:
Am I alone with the display banding (really noticeable if you press the search button - the Bing 'Wallpaper' used to be really high resolution but now looks pants)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was like that before NoDo. I think it just depends on the wallpaper tbh. Dont think the quality is lower. But just not the right rendering.
Ive wrote to MS on facebook. On their feedback programme and questionaires and twitter about the camera settings.
Accordingly by alot of websites its a "feature" so incase you mess up settings it goes back to normal. I can justify this for all the settings except the quality settings. Damn why would you want to shoot in lower resolution when you can do it in 720p?
evolutionqy7 said:
That was like that before NoDo. I think it just depends on the wallpaper tbh. Dont think the quality is lower. But just not the right rendering.
Ive wrote to MS on facebook. On their feedback programme and questionaires and twitter about the camera settings.
Accordingly by alot of websites its a "feature" so incase you mess up settings it goes back to normal. I can justify this for all the settings except the quality settings. Damn why would you want to shoot in lower resolution when you can do it in 720p?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lower frame rate at 720p on some devices?
comeradealexi said:
lower frame rate at 720p on some devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isnt that OEM's fault for not getting the code right?
I wish MS just stopped mucking around and release their own damn phone. That way there will be no fall in quality as they will be able to control everything on the phone and do it, the way its meant to be done
I have noticed the same problem with display.
The most visible artefacts I have found in "Now" app. Waves the the top of the screen are corrupted with soime artefacts.
I have also noticed that photos in people tile are more bright than before update.
Again your just being picky. Ive seen the wave ripples for vibration before the update.
It shouldnt affect the display or anything else. Its just an OS update and not a firmware update (well atleast that was the case for me)
Ive said this alot of times before that the clarity of AMOLED screens isnt as good as LCD screens. Yeah colours might be nicer but its not as clear as LCD SLCD
I do not want to compare SuperAmoled (Oled) and SLCD (LCD).
I do compare a display issue which appeared after update to 7008/NoDo from 7004.
There was no display issue with firmware 7004. Al least I believe it because I had not noticed it before update.
I'm just saying that it was there already. And its amoled issue and not the OS as their two different things
Sent from my OMNIA7 using Board Express
Is there absolutely no improvement to the 720P capture? Is it still very choppy?
I wish Samsung would sort out the abnormally high shutter speed/white balance bug, so that the videos would appear less choppy.
Live mail folders still dosent update correct on my phone.
Sent from my Omnia 7 using Board Express

Banding

Banding, otherwise known as contouring, is a digital artifact common to images, displays or apps of 16bit(thousands of colours) or less.
Gradient image
Viewing the 24bit image in the above link will not show banding on a 24bit display(3 x 8bit channels of R, G & B millions of colours) if viewed in a 24bit app.
If 32 distinct bands are seen, possibly with every 1/3 band being a green shade, then the screen or the image viewing application is not 24bit capable.
Viewing 16bit or lower resolution gradient images on your screen will also show banding.
The Android browser shows banding with this image while the Dolphin HD browser does not.
In short, the SGNote has a 24bit display, which will show banding if viewing 16bit or lower images or using a 16bit or lower viewing application.
More on screen bits
Im noticing lots of banding in lots of different apps :-/
Same here, also happens with Google apps like the Market. Not sure what we can do about it anybody has suggestions?
Bigmille said:
Same here, also happens with Google apps like the Market. Not sure what we can do about it anybody has suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least it is not the Note's display hardware that is the issue.
ICS may upgrade some Android OS apps to 24bit.
Thank You for this
This proves that Apps that display banding simply aren't rendering at 24bit.
I was leaning towards there being an issue with the screen as this problem was not noticeable on my previous android devices.
This clarifies everything.
Thanks.
qazzi76 said:
This proves that Apps that display banding simply aren't rendering at 24bit.
I was leaning towards there being an issue with the screen as this problem was not noticeable on my previous android devices.
This clarifies everything.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are welcome.
It bugged me too, until I got to the bottom of it.
Trust your eyes, the screen is glorious.
I too don't believe the hardware to be the issue. I suspect it's more to do with having a device with a smallish screen and a large 1280x800 resolution. Higher res images and videos look amazing. If the image is quite compressed (i.e. lossy) then the higher resolution screen will show this more than a low resolution screen. Garbage in, garbage out comes to mind. We need all apps and videos and images to be high resolution 24bit minimum to make the most of our amazing screen .
paulshields said:
I too don't believe the hardware to be the issue. I suspect it's more to do with having a device with a smallish screen and a large 1280x800 resolution. Higher res images and videos look amazing. If the image is quite compressed (i.e. lossy) then the higher resolution screen will show this more than a low resolution screen. Garbage in, garbage out comes to mind. We need all apps and videos and images to be high resolution 24bit minimum to make the most of our amazing screen .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent. I will put it in a drawer for a year or so then. Hopefully by then there will be some video I can watch.
seepage said:
Excellent. I will put it in a drawer for a year or so then. Hopefully by then there will be some video I can watch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha ha . Listen, think of it like this. You've probably got a high resolution monitor attached to your computer. Do you prefer watching videos at 420p and lower or 720p and higher? No doubt the answer is higher resolution to match your monitor.
What Samsung has done is squeeze in a screen with similar resolution to a 13" laptop, but in a 5.3" mobile device! So we're going to come across lots of images and videos aimed at 'normal' mobile devices, which won't look so great on our high-res screen. To make the most of the screen you can copy 720p or 1080p high profile videos to your sdcard, and they will look incredible on playback, but they will also be large and it's a slow process, and if the video is long then it'll also hit the limitation with FAT max file sizes. Those issues aren't the fault of the screen though. It's simple really. If you want to make the most of the screen density then you have to provide it with good quality source material suitable for a high resolution screen.
Do you think that its just software? No hardware? Do you think that ICS will fix this?
I came from dell streak and its realy hard to watch on note specialy on dark scene.
even opening xda app it has banding problems
rockysiccion said:
Do you think that its just software? No hardware? Do you think that ICS will fix this?
I came from dell streak and its realy hard to watch on note specialy on dark scene.
even opening xda app it has banding problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's definitely not a hardware issue because the screen is definitely 24bit colour. It displays well in the right app. You could swap apps for those that handle higher bit images. If you use Dolphin HD, possibly other browsers, webpages are seen in 24bit, if they are 24bit images. I don't know but there must be alternative picture viewing apps. Dice Player is a high res video viewer. As for system graphics, they don't look so bad to me. For games etc, it means living with banding until the maker upgrades? This is always the case on computers.
Be thankful Samsung have not rorted us.
Apple has ripped off it's customers many times selling lo-res screens as high res:
"Apple has received a new class action complaint alleging the MacBook
does not support millions of colors, but rather 16 bit color, which is
dithered to approximate millions of colors."
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:37:17 -0500
I don't have a Note yet, but can somebody try with QuickPic, it has an option in it's settings to force decode in 32bit mode.
That could clarify if it is a software or hardware problem...
paulshields said:
ha ha . Listen, think of it like this. You've probably got a high resolution monitor attached to your computer. Do you prefer watching videos at 420p and lower or 720p and higher? No doubt the answer is higher resolution to match your monitor.
What Samsung has done is squeeze in a screen with similar resolution to a 13" laptop, but in a 5.3" mobile device! So we're going to come across lots of images and videos aimed at 'normal' mobile devices, which won't look so great on our high-res screen. To make the most of the screen you can copy 720p or 1080p high profile videos to your sdcard, and they will look incredible on playback, but they will also be large and it's a slow process, and if the video is long then it'll also hit the limitation with FAT max file sizes. Those issues aren't the fault of the screen though. It's simple really. If you want to make the most of the screen density then you have to provide it with good quality source material suitable for a high resolution screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The video and photographs shot with the phone's own camera have the same problems as other video and pictures. Surely they should display OK.
Some Android apps only render in 16bit
seepage said:
The video and photographs shot with the phone's own camera have the same problems as other video and pictures. Surely they should display OK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone has a 24bit 16 million colour display.
Some apps, including the picture viewing gallery app do not display 24bit colour in the 24bit quality they were made. See here
Thanks, Xaddict, this all makes sense regarding 24- versus 16-bit rendering.
Still, shouldn't intelligent/adaptive codecs be able to bridge the chasm by re-rendering 16-bit source material into some sort of "interleaved" or "inferred" gradual gradation or gradient... a codec to "smooth" the blend, if you will.
It's a codec issue, isn't it?
I wonder if Samsung or ICS will solve this first, if ever...
It feels like the Note has the same display like the first Desire (Amoled) that I've owned.
Its been said that this is a software problem, I've never seen this fixed with a 3rd party custom ROM since the Galaxy S1 days. Even 'x' ROM still shows color banding.
Found a solution for the wallpaper. Install MultiPicture live wallpaper (free from market) Go into it's settings and select "Color depth", then select "True color (24-bit). If the image you selected and used is 24bit, there will be no banding in your wallpaper. Hope this helped, cheers
Depending on the wallpaper you'ed still see massive banding.
EarlZ said:
Depending on the wallpaper you'ed still see massive banding.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a software problem.
If anything, it's a low quality image being viewed on a 24bit screen problem.

Low Saturation and Contrast?

Bought the 10...love the way it runs but I bought it to show my photography work on (would use an ipad but I really detest the ios software).
The entire screen seems to be washed out overall with weak black levels and reds in particular are low saturation.
Sharp as a tack for sure....is it just mine? I see such conflicting reports in reviews although I am seeing more now about low saturation and contrast.
Very frustrating....unless someone out there knows some way of calibrating this display which I haven't found?
you are right
i am also a photographer (Canon 5D MkII)
i have watched some photos now(got my N10 yesterday) and as you said the screen is sharp as hell
i have never seen this amount of details with my DSLR photos.
im also doing hardware calibration and i see whats wrong right away and i have also tested it...the problem is that the gamma is to low.
The N10 has a Gamma Level around 1.4 - 1.5 where it should be 2.2!
(yeah that should make some attention hehe)
thats a fact and thats why we have washed out colors and bad contrast
but the good thing is that even at that low gamma we have a decent picture quality with good black levels!
i dont think the black levels on my device is washed out
it shouldnt be this good with this crappy gamma but it is
thats amazing and that tells that this is a quality screen above normal.
with correct gamma at 2.2 this screen will rock for sure.
so lets wait for some kernel guru to make some gamma adjustments
i have said i before that im willing to pay that person that makes gamma adjustment possible for the N10s.
You are correct...gamma is definitely too low.
As far as washed out reds go, I suppose I could process specifically for display on this tablet but that's a pain in the butt.
I wish the darned ipad wasn't such a restrictive ecosystem for the software. The colors rock on the ipad unfortunately but it's just too darned restrictive.
jfenton57 said:
You are correct...gamma is definitely too low.
As far as washed out reds go, I suppose I could process specifically for display on this tablet but that's a pain in the butt.
I wish the darned ipad wasn't such a restrictive ecosystem for the software. The colors rock on the ipad unfortunately but it's just too darned restrictive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im waiting for a i1 Display Pro colormeter
when i get it i will do a hardware calibration.
but i have checked some stuff already and i think that the colors is right for its low gamma.
also the brightness for the colors seems the same for Red/Green/Blue and thats a good thing
also the contrast and black level is reference.
i also think the color temp is close to 6500k
that means that the grayscale is correct.
so the only thing that messes up this display is the low gamma.
(or wrong gamma curve/line)
you have some tests here that you can do without a colormeter,if you want to check it out
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
also you can download the AVSHD 709 Patterns here.
http://www.avsforum.com/t/948496/avs-hd-709-blu-ray-mp4-calibration
just copy the mp4 files to your N10 and run them.
one note that i can see is that it seems that the gamma is higher at the lower shades
it seems to be around 1.8 there
that could explain why we dont have completely washed out blacks.
but what you want is a plain straight gamma line at 2.2
the N10 seems to have a hill shaped line starting high at lower shades and lower around maximum white.
I have tested the N10 with a Pantone "hocky puck" and can confirm the observations posted above. As compared to overly saturated profiles most normal users are used to, it's no wonder many see the N10 as flat and dull. My N7 is horrible, not only flat but had a color temp that was blueish green.
Much of my publicly displayed work for general web based consumption, has the saturation pumped up farther then I like, but my "fans" (sarc) seem to enjoy my photographs when contrast and saturation is pushed high. Ironically, my over saturated photographs look good to me on the low gamma N10, lol.
Either way, most all of us would benefit from being able to adjust our N10s. As many of you know this is best done at the kernel level and the master of sound and color Samsung kernels is SuperCurio and his project Voodoo. I have heard hearsay that he is working on kernel code and color profiles that can support adjustments for the N10, but I have yet to confirm this myself.
As usual we are given hardware that needs code improvements to be fully realized and that seems to always be done by the development community. It will taken time but I am confident we'll get there to some degree soon.
As far as I could tell there is no gamma correction in the kernel because the Nexus 10 uses a new display port interface thats in the Exynos 5. Most devices I've seen have at least a static gamma table in the kernel but that doesn't appear to be true for the Nexus 10.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
12paq said:
I have heard hearsay that he is working on kernel code and color profiles that can support adjustments for the N10, but I have yet to confirm this myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
give him my money!
that sounds great
post in this thread if you hear more about it!
as i said in other threads i will pay around 50$ for the person that makes gamma adjustment possible for the N10.
btw: hockey puck?
are you serious ?

Clarity/resolution

The LG V60 ThinQ has a crazy crisp display. Just kidding, this is automated text so who knows if this screen is any good. So, you be the judge! A higher rating indicates that it's extremely sharp and clear, and that you cannot see pixels with your naked eye.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Very clear. The resolution is lower than my V30, I think, but it's not noticeable to me.
I honestly don't notice the lower resolution and because of that always had my previous phones set to 1080p to save battery.
Auto brightness has been a problem though, in low light the screen throttles back to 1% far too aggressively and 1% is too dim even in a pitch black room.
Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk
The larger screen size and lower resolution combine for a noticeably lower DPI count, but I happen to think that higher (than 1080p) resolutions on (relatively) smaller phone displays are mostly a waste of battery life.
YMMV, but in my experience, there comes a point where the human eye can only resolve so much and the bump in the resolution of small screen displays just becomes overkill. I'll take battery life over resolution and even refresh rate any day, though I imagine higher resolution displays with higher refresh rates will only become more efficient over time, and I'll likely change my tune eventually.
I went from the V30+ to the V60 at the beginning of this month, and I feel like the new phone is a substantial upgrade over the older one in just about all categories that matter. And that's even considering that the former was rooted and the latter can't be!
The display is crisp enough, though clearly not cutting edge. Colors look at least as good as those of the V30. Viewing angles are fantastic without any noticeable (to me) color shift. It's probably the best we could have expected knowing that the display is relatively modest compared to this phone's 20202 (and some 2019) peers. And if you're fine with that, this shouldn't stop you from considering the phone. If, however, you DO want higher resolutions and higher refresh rates, you already know this phone's not for you and that you've got multiple options.
Mejilan said:
Viewing angles are fantastic without any noticeable (to me) color shift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm seeing very drastic color shift when viewing at about 45°, more noticeable on white screens. It's a greenish yellowish shift.
Otherwise I agree with the rest of your post. 1080p is plenty resolution and I'm fine with 60Hz refresh.
Mr_Mooncatt said:
I'm seeing very drastic color shift when viewing at about 45°, more noticeable on white screens. It's a greenish yellowish shift.
Otherwise I agree with the rest of your post. 1080p is plenty resolution and I'm fine with 60Hz refresh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are there display variances across production runs, or something? Because I can't seem to reproduce this fault.
I'm not TERRIBLY sensitive to such things, but from what you say, it sounds like it should be blatantly obvious to the eyes.
And I don't suffer from any kind of color blindness that could possibly impact me.
Mejilan said:
Are there display variances across production runs, or something? Because I can't seem to reproduce this fault.
I'm not TERRIBLY sensitive to such things, but from what you say, it sounds like it should be blatantly obvious to the eyes.
And I don't suffer from any kind of color blindness that could possibly impact me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen anyone else complain of this, so not site if it's an issue with mine specifically or what. Here's a short video I made that hopefully demonstrates the color shift.
https://youtu.be/naGHasaIjp0
Mr_Mooncatt said:
I haven't seen anyone else complain of this, so not site if it's an issue with mine specifically or what. Here's a short video I made that hopefully demonstrates the color shift.
https://youtu.be/naGHasaIjp0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh. How did you get a plain white background to show up like that? (I suppose I can Google one up).
I'd like to test my phone out and see if I can get similar results.
It's a little hard to see in a YT video, but I definitely noticed SOME shift on your screen that I don't think I've ever seen on mine.
I imagine the effect is even more noticeable in real life, with the phone right in front of you.
Mejilan said:
Huh. How did you get a plain white background to show up like that? (I suppose I can Google one up).
I'd like to test my phone out and see if I can get similar results.
It's a little hard to see in a YT video, but I definitely noticed SOME shift on your screen that I don't think I've ever seen on mine.
I imagine the effect is even more noticeable in real life, with the phone right in front of you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.iudesk.android.photo.editor
It's a photo editing app, but you can start a new image from scratch and select a background color. I set it to pure white, then zoomed in on it to fill the screen. It's definitely easier to see in person. I tried using by wife's Note 9 for the video, but I couldn't select a better refresh rate on it to prevent the banding.
Mr_Mooncatt said:
I use this app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.iudesk.android.photo.editor
It's a photo editing app, but you can start a new image from scratch and select a background color. I set it to pure white, then zoomed in on it to fill the screen. It's definitely easier to see in person. I tried using by wife's Note 9 for the video, but I couldn't select a better refresh rate on it to prevent the banding.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried it out, and while I did notice a dimming or darkening of the white background at extreme tilts, I figure that's normal.
Doesn't quite look like what your YT video shows, but I'm not sure if that's down to the difference between watching a YT video of something and watching it yourself directly.
I've had the V30 and now this and I'm as happy with the screen on this one as I was with the V30. I couldn't care about the refresh rate. It's not like I'm watching a 60" screen. Overall it's a very good screen.
Mr_Mooncatt said:
I'm seeing very drastic color shift when viewing at about 45°, more noticeable on white screens. It's a greenish yellowish shift.
Otherwise I agree with the rest of your post. 1080p is plenty resolution and I'm fine with 60Hz refresh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I pissed that it's 1080P, however, people who say a 90+ refresh rate is noticeable is just experiencing placebo.
The human eye will never notice that.
Sent from my LG-H932 using XDA Labs
BROKEN1981 said:
I pissed that it's 1080P, however, people who say a 90+ refresh rate is noticeable is just experiencing placebo.
The human eye will never notice that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had higher resolution screens, and I can tell no difference between them and 1080p. Even 720p is hard to notice a difference.
When it comes to refresh rates, most people see a noticeable difference between 60Hz and 90Hz. My last phone was selectable between those two and 120Hz, and I couldn't tell a difference between 90Hz and 120Hz.
I can see the difference in resolution between the V30 and V60, it's just that 1080p on a phone doesn't bother me.
It falls in my "good enough" range. These aren't 55+ inch television displays, after all.
I also can definitely see the difference between a 60 Hz refresh rate vs a 90 Hz or 120 Hz refresh display.
my problem is with notifications in the top pull down... its virtually useless in landscape mode...

Categories

Resources