can anyone tell me what score do you get in ''Smartbench 2010'' with android 2.2 on you xperia x10?
btw with 2.1 and JIT i get 910 on productivity index and 1044 on games index.
there`s no significant improvment with this bechmark test
1023
1173
Related
Please share it. Thank you
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk
539 Quadrant....
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
neocore 27.7 fps
517 Quadrant
552
.
Quadrant - 547
Linpack - 6.973 MFLOP/s
james_2k said:
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's lots of benchmarks you can do.. not just video recording... also a danger of this thread being a mess as everyone uses different tools.. It'll only be useful if people use the same benchmarking tools such as Quadrant and linpak.
i got 553 [Quadrant Advance]
little bit dissapointed, nexus 2.1, and motodroid 2.1 are better than ours,
quadrant :
517
sooo slow
quadrant - 560
quadrant 530
573.......
Quadrant: 517. Why is it so low? Ideas?
Linpack: 6,95 MFLOP/s
536 on mine
670 Quadrant
9.2 MFLOPS on Linpack
wtf, 670? sorry i'm gonna want some proof for that
http://db.tt/tlimV6b
http://db.tt/XXtlV8k
Quadrant: 1756
yeah, that's right it's not my X10, it's My Galaxy S
X10: 570
why is this varying between devices running on the same OS version??
Shouldn't our scores be the same? For the person who scored over 600 - are you running ADW launcher? I have a feeling ADW launcher is causing my score to be low by using too much of the CPU resources?!
On CM3 the highest Ive gotten is 1013
On Linpack Ive gotten as high as 5.79
Curious to see what others are getting.
Don't have CM3.
5.28 on Linopack.
Offtopic:
(on Linpack's latest runs website saw 51.1 and 88 on a G2 !! - running @ 1.5 and 1.4 mhz respectively. I mean, Dude!).
My un-overclocked CM 6.1 Froyo Nexus tops at 35 MFlops. I'll try to downgrade it to 2.1 to be able to compare apples to apples.​
Quadrant Standard: 550 (for comparison, my Froyo Nexus: 1430, but 2.1 stock Nexus: 520).
I do not feel my S7 slow, laggy or lazy in any aspect though.
Linpack: 5.45
Quadrant: 550
Sent from my Ideos S7 using XDA App
I am getting around 524 on my Quadrant score with the S7.
Same as you guys.
linpack
mflops 6.07
norm res:5.68
Singapore set
Linpack: 6.988
Quadrant: 1506
Quadrant - 627
Linpack - 7.045
Huawei S7 Life Edition. ROM Australia Telsta. Boot onliner.by edition
I'm running Cyanogen Mod 7 v 2.5 Gingerbread on my HD2 which is clocked at 1.536Ghz.
Best quadrant score I could pull was 1418, with results being inconsistent every time I run the test.
Best score in linpack was 41 MFLOPS.
Best CPU bench score was 672ms.
Now, don't get me wrong. I know these scores are a def improvement over stock and nothing to sneer at, but I've seen HD2's that only run at 1.1 - 1.2Ghz with Froyo in the 1600+ Quadrant/60 MFLOPS+ CPU bench range.
I'm kinda stumped here. What's up?
Can someone please make a benchmarks for most popular x8 roms! it would help for me and for others as well, i suppose!
anyone who can take this advantage
I can tell you mine.
Using XGin 5.3 with no overclock or undervolt, I get ~1000 in Quadrant and ~1500 in AnTuTu Benchmark
I'm using Floyo v1.0 with [email protected]
I get ~1100 in Quadrant(Advanced Version,I found Standard's score is lower than Advance's.)
Edit:Without OC,The score is ~1000
Using FroyoBread v020
No OC, No UV
Quadrant Advanced: 1100~1155
Neo Core: 44~48
Linpack: 4.1~4.3
I get 993 on my X8 with miniCM6 by ponanovn.
No OC, no UV, but I installed x8MDDI-lagfix.
Cool! and how about the 3D marks? just curious!
would be cool if someone could make a diagramm with x8 rom benchmarks
may go for it...but i guess im too busy for such fun!
nice, now i have to decide...was flasing a rom and my mum badly touched the phone it fell down battery out...
i cant decide between hackdroid floyo 1.0 and froyobread the newest!
having froyobread v021 now and got 726 points in quadrant... didn't ever get such low points..
i get around 820 to 860 on quadrant standard and Neo Core: 44~46
i have overlocked to 720mhz which pretty much stable and undervolt but don't know which app best for this can help me i am using foryobread 0.21v
These are the result of the benchmarks done to the kernels that are being developed (4 Apr 2013) for the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 .
The settings used are the default that come with N7100XXDMB6 on a GN2 baseband N7100XXDLK7. The changes from the stock areas follows , rooted, TWrecovery 2.3.3.2 , 240 dpi. Brightness used during test 100 %, WiFi on, Nova Launcher Pro, Force GPU rendering (enabled) under Developer options, Power saving option OFF, GPS off , Screen rotation on, sound on 100%, multiwindow active.
Kernels used Stock mb6, Perseus 34.2, Adam 2.2.1 , Neak 1.7
Applications used 3dMark 1.0.0-875 , RL Benchmark:SQLite 1.3 , Vellamo 2.0.2 , CF-Bench 1.2 , AnTuTu Benchmark 3.2.2 , PowerTutor 1.4
Addition applications Linpack for Android 1.2.8, Pi Benchmark 1.0, Quadrant Standart 2.1.1, Geekbench2 2.4.2, SD Tools 3.0.
Methodology used : The benchmarks were run in sequence 1 minutes after a clean reboot was done (cleaning cache and dalvik-cache).
Explanation about the results,
3dMark has 2 scores the first is the normal and the second the extreme suite (Higher is better).
RL Benchmark:SQLite measures the time in seconds needed to dullfill the tests incuded ( smaller is better).
Vellamo has two scores first is HTML5 and second is the metal suite score ( Higher is better).
CF-Bench has three scores first is native score, second is java score and third is overall score ( Higher is better).
AnTuTu just the overall result ( Higher is better).
PowerTutor measures the power usage in milliWatt for the last 5 minutes ( smaller is better).
Linpcack for Android measures floating point performance of the system , has two numbers first is single thread second is multi threaded score in Mflops (higher is better).
Pi benchmark measures the time in seconds to calculate pi, I settled for 200 000 numbers ( smaller is better).
Quadrant Standart 2.1.1 ( higher better).
Geekbench2 2.4.2 cross platform bench ( higher better).
SD Tools measures the read and write speed in Mb/s from the sdcard, first number is writting speed second is read speed (higher better).
Results :
Stock MB6
3dMark 3339x2502
Sql 14.837
Vellamo 1763x610
CFbench 26604x7402x15082
Antutu 16979
Powertutor 803 mW
Perseus 34.2
3dMark 3034x2305
Sql 14.482
Vellamo 1743x612
CFbench 26027x7407x14855
Antutu 17140
Powertutor 816
Adam2.2.1
3dMark 3203x2421
Sql 20.406
Vellamo 1776x619
CFbench 26253x7423x14955
Antutu 17311
Powertutor 805
Neak 1.7
3dMark 3199x2432
Sql 15.855
Vellamo 1710x624
CFbench 26934x7558x15308
Antutu 15911
Powertutor 810
Stock MB5
3dMark 3312x2476
Sql 14.54
Vellamo 1753x610
CFbench 25915x7355x14779
Antutu 17268
PowerTutor 807 mW
Stock MC3
3dMark 3282x2474
Sql 15.181
Vellamo 1768x599
CFBench 26544x7652x15208
Antutu 17024
PowerTutor 502 mW
Linpack 64 x 211
Pi 200 000 53.67
QuadrantS 6991
Geekbench 2059
SD Tools 6.0x12.5
Abyss 2.3.1
3dMark 3200x2387
Sql 14.334
Vellamo 1740x619
CFBench 25870x7077x14595
Antutu 16780
PowerTutor 500 mW
Linpack 62 x 68
Pi benchmark 53.29
QuadrantS 7149
Geekbench 2105
SdTools 6.2x14.9
RedPill 1.42
3dMark 3145x2379
Sql 16.854
Vellamo 1502x618
CFBench 25297x7373x14542
Antutu 16927
PowerTutor 501 mw
Linpack 62x129
Pi benchmark 53.12 s
QuadrantS 6635
Geekbench 2005
SdTools 6.4x12.8 Mb/s
Devil 0.12
3dMark 3177x2315
Sql 14.668
Vellamo 1744x604
CFBench 24850x7335x14341
Antutu 17227
PowerTutor 508
Linpack 64x124
Pi benchmark 53.79
Quadrant S 6661
Geekbench 1696
SdTools 5.8x12.6
The intention of these test is to show the devs their strength/weakness regarding the benchmarks area. These benchmarks are purely synthetic which means they DO NOT represent real life scenario usage.
I am opened to every suggestion possible for further monthly or bimonthly benchs.
Edit: For accuracy have to clarify that about the difference in results with PowerTutor due to removing of an application that used exactly 300 mw the results of the recent test show 300 mw less than the previous ones.
Adam Kernel
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
dianlb50 said:
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock has given me no problems so far, it seems it gives a perfect middle point for my usage, as for the optimizations done to specific kernels, the efforts of the dev is not well represented in the results of such simple bench tests bcs the results are within margins of error of such test, but again have to stress out that these are purely synthetic benchs therefore DO NOT apply to real life scenarios.
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
hagba said:
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added results for the Stock MB5 on the OP.
Added results for Stock MC3 , RedPill and Abyss kernels. plus some additional benchmark tools.
Stock DMB5, Perseus Kernel
@ 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
abauer said:
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, but the OP is TL;DR.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
ThankS for posting
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Added Devil kernel results.
Perseus 35
Geekbench
Quadrant
Sql
Antutu
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2