Flipped though this video today. Thought the launcher was really nice, and it is actually quite similar to TouchWiz in my opinion. Is it possible to port this to our phones?
http://androidcommunity.com/lg-optimus-2x-gets-demoed-in-20-minute-official-hands-on-20110121/
Video is long but I let it load and just scrolled through it. I like how you can actually group your applications by the type of app it is.
It hasnt even released yet.....
Rockin' DJ05, Minimal Icognito, Clocked at 1.3Ghz
that looks real good.
TheSonicEmerald said:
It hasnt even released yet.....
Rockin' DJ05, Minimal Icognito, Clocked at 1.3Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i know it hasn't released yet. but just wanted to share. And it would be a sweet port.
Related
just a side note, i was running kings kernel and ran 40 Mf constant on linpack. i just flashed ziggy's, got constant 35's
i just found this
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=2657&view=1&c=verizon_htc_droid_incredible_hd
and it makes me wonder, couldn't we take this devices kernel once its available to make a stable 1.2 ghz standard incredible? the processor cant be much different. i think ima start looking into this a bit...
edit,
they just jumped equal
akawings said:
i just found this
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=2657&view=1&c=verizon_htc_droid_incredible_hd
and it makes me wonder, couldn't we take this devices kernel once its available to make a stable 1.2 ghz standard incredible? the processor cant be much different. i think ima start looking into this a bit...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh but it is... Not only do the new snapdragons have a higher clock rate, but the GPU is supremely superior.
Also there are SOME dinc snapdragons that can overclock to 1.2ghz (1.19 really) using a custom kernel but most aren't stable at that speed. I myself can climb to 1.15ghz but my device restarts when I try 1.19. It has to do with the manufacturing process; not all CPUs are created equal.
Div033 said:
Oh but it is... Not only do the new snapdragons have a higher clock rate, but the GPU is supremely superior.
Also there are SOME dinc snapdragons that can overclock to 1.2ghz (1.19 really) using a custom kernel but most aren't stable at that speed. I myself can climb to 1.15ghz but my device restarts when I try 1.19. It has to do with the manufacturing process; not all CPUs are created equal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, yeah I can do 1. 19 stable, now I must find a kernel or build a kernel that is capped above 1.19 just to see how far I can go.. I wonder if this thing being aosp is gonna give me annual issues
I have mine at 1.28 with ziggys kernel and it's stable
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
morph3k said:
I have mine at 1.28 with ziggys kernel and it's stable
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure it's not the 1 that reads 1.2 but only runs 1.15? Some dev bs'ed ziggy on some of the code
akawings said:
Sure it's not the 1 that reads 1.2 but only runs 1.15? Some dev bs'ed ziggy on some of the code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, at the stated 1.28 it is actually at 1.15, he posted that a couple weeks ago.
RMarkwald said:
Correct, at the stated 1.28 it is actually at 1.15, he posted that a couple weeks ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh. Had no idea.
morph3k said:
Oh. Had no idea.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah its kinda disappointing.. but it happens.. ima have to build a custom kernel for linpack now.. im stuck at 40 mf... so sad....
So I am wondering what others opinions are of the roms and kernels available for the SF. Doesn't seem to be much of an improvement on Quadrant scores utilizing another rom or even stupidfast kernels.
Are we just kind of screwed a bit until 2.2? Is there a kernel that is overclocked?
TIA.
Quadrant scores are mostly meaningless, and 2.2 is unlikely to be revolutionary. The phone performs well on 2.1 - keep reading the forum and you'll get there.
In my opinion the biggest performance increases ive seen werent in any benchmarks but in dj05. it runs amazing. If u havent tried it i dont know whether you should or not. With the impending froyo release no one knows if they are actually going to release DJ05 or not. I think they should release it and then put froyo on top of that foundation if at all possible
Sent from my SCH-I800(tab) using ksizzle9's crazy kool ROM(bone stock with root) from within the XDA App
What do you feel about DJ that helped it out?
I finally stayed with just a Voodoo lag kernel. There certain operations on the phone I had gotten used to that were slow. The kernel with lag fix did show me noticeable improvement, more than just a higher I/O score in Quadrant.
I think the phone is fairly solid on 2.1 but needs a little help. Hopefully the Froyo upgrade really is around the corner but Im not holding my breath
jfigura said:
What do you feel about DJ that helped it out?
I finally stayed with just a Voodoo lag kernel. There certain operations on the phone I had gotten used to that were slow. The kernel with lag fix did show me noticeable improvement, more than just a higher I/O score in Quadrant.
I think the phone is fairly solid on 2.1 but needs a little help. Hopefully the Froyo upgrade really is around the corner but Im not holding my breath
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running DJ05 deox, and the stock DJ05 kernel. I used Titanium Backup to remove all the bloatware, and I use ADW instead of TouchWiz crap. (I took TW off with Titanium Backup too). SetCPU to set max to 1ghz, and minimum to 400mhz. (NO PROFILES!!!) It runs just fine for me. Rather damn speedy actually!! I dont do the whole benchmark test business, doesn't really mean much IMO.
Yes benchmarks dont mean too much. But they are a good indication of overall performance in their specific areas that they test. As they fascinate test well in every area except i/o. But we already kne that. Im not sure what about DJ05 Made it feel so solid to me just overall improvement and actual working GPS
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
ksizzle9 said:
Yes benchmarks dont mean too much. But they are a good indication of overall performance in their specific areas that they test. As they fascinate test well in every area except i/o. But we already kne that. Im not sure what about DJ05 Made it feel so solid to me just overall improvement and actual working GPS
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you get the dj05 update?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Ive only tried voodoo/lagfix
It made a significant difference on my phone. I reverted and restored all the factory stuff in anticipation of JD05 because I want to get it OTA when it drops.
I tried to get the leaked one in IRC but people just kept calling me n00b so I gave up.
I am hopeful that it will solve all my woes and usher in a new era of speed only previously dreamt about
Powell730 said:
Where did you get the dj05 update?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its been discussed dozens of times where and how to get dj05
joe3681 said:
I'm running DJ05 deox, and the stock DJ05 kernel. I used Titanium Backup to remove all the bloatware, and I use ADW instead of TouchWiz crap. (I took TW off with Titanium Backup too). SetCPU to set max to 1ghz, and minimum to 400mhz. (NO PROFILES!!!) It runs just fine for me. Rather damn speedy actually!! I dont do the whole benchmark test business, doesn't really mean much IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ksizzle9 said:
Yes benchmarks dont mean too much. But they are a good indication of overall performance in their specific areas that they test. As they fascinate test well in every area except i/o. But we already kne that. Im not sure what about DJ05 Made it feel so solid to me just overall improvement and actual working GPS
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Joe: same setup here (DJ05 deo, Stock Kernel and Rom, Frozen bloat in Titanium) without SetCPU. It's FAST. My GF and both my sons have EVOs running 2.2 and my Fascinate is just as fast (or faster)
@ksizzle: I agree, it's hard to quantify exactly what is so good about it. I think it's not what's there, but what's NOT there (lag) I think there are going to be plenty of happy n00bs when the OTA hits. This phone will be a screamer right out of the box!
NOsquid said:
Quadrant scores are mostly meaningless, and 2.2 is unlikely to be revolutionary.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, the real performance difference between 2.2. and 2.1 is very revolutionary, though I certainly agree with you about the irrelevance of Quadrant scores. The Java virtual machine, for example, executes code 450% -- that's not a typo -- faster, which directly impacts most apps.
And, 2.2's browser is also significantly faster than 2.1's -- and iOS4's, for that matter.
I like my Fascinate, and yes, I would consider it fast (especially running DJ05 with Geeknik's kernels) but like many others, I too see slowdowns sometimes that just shouldn't happen with the phone's hardware. Froyo isn't a magic pill, per se, but it should significantly reduce or eliminate those slowdowns (as it did on my old Droid 1, despite it's far-slower processor).
http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/and...r-vs-android-15-cupcake-speed-taste-49305763/
http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/0...-it-compared-to-2-1-oh-only-about-450-faster/
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2010/07/android-22-demolishes-ios4-in-javascript-benchmarks.ars
Actually, the real performance difference between 2.2. and 2.1 is very revolutionary, though I certainly agree with you about the irrelevance of Quadrant scores. The Java virtual machine, for example, executes code 450% in benchmarks -- that's not a typo -- faster, which do not directly impact most apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed that for ya. Don't let marketing hype get the best of ya.
Everything I've read states that the performance improvements between 2.1 and 2.2 have little effect on Hummingbird processors (which is what is in all Galaxy S phones), and the biggest performance gains are seen on Snapdragon processors. As far as performance goes, I'll believe it when I see it.
imnuts said:
Everything I've read states that the performance improvements between 2.1 and 2.2 have little effect on Hummingbird processors (which is what is in all Galaxy S phones), and the biggest performance gains are seen on Snapdragon processors. As far as performance goes, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is because JIT was designed specifically around a Snapdragon processor.
Is it possible to make a kernel that can break the 56-ish fps cap on the Fascinate? I've seen the 1.4 ghz voodoo kernel just realeased for the Vibrant break the FPS cap, with amazing speeds in benchmark and real-life to match. Does anyone know how this is accomplished? I just want to see some serious performance boost.
Rockin' DJ05, Minimal Icognito, Clocked at 1.3Ghz
the FPS cap seems to go up with cpu clock speed. Not sure what changing the cpu clock has to due with a graphics test if it's really testing just the graphics though.
I'm running at 1.3ghz, and my neocore is still the same.
Rockin' DJ05, Minimal Icognito, Clocked at 1.3Ghz
Im sure some time drift is involved.
Are there any overclocked kernels for the fascinate that work good?
/edit let me reword that, I have a mesmerize, can I overclock my device?
Sent from my Galaxy S.
Is there a difference between these two kernels? They both have the same features. Opinion?
Press search. This thread was created about 3 days ago.
Readers digest, both are amazing, seemed like most were on OS.
roguly said:
Is there a difference between these two kernels? They both have the same features. Opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They perform exactly the same in my opinion
Roughly the same feature set, but categorically worthless kernel seems a bit more stable for me. Theres a more aggressive ram hack in ovedstock, possibly leading to the higher benchmarks. All I want is stability, stock frequency, and voodoo sound. Both are great kernels though, and come highly recommended. In the end you wont see much difference.
Sent from my Vibrant using XDA App, Bionix-v 1.21
s15274n said:
Press search. This thread was created about 3 days ago.
Readers digest, both are amazing, seemed like most were on OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I wasn't like specifically looking for an answer so that's why I didn't search for this question. I was just looking at the kernels and realized they were both the same so I made this thread.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
roguly said:
Sorry, I wasn't like specifically looking for an answer so that's why I didn't search for this question. I was just looking at the kernels and realized they were both the same so I made this thread.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be sorry, be yourself. With that said, they are not the same. I started with CW and ran quadrants of low to mid 1400's. Battery life decent, phone was snappy but not jaw-dropping. I moved to OS, and quadrant scores jumped to mid to high 1600's. Snappy would be a mild understatement for how the phone responded then. Battery life seemed better, but it could also have been a difference in usage. This was all with stock 2.2 ROM, mind you.
Now... I run Trigger with OverStock, quadrants are consistently mid 1800's, battery life is great, and snappy would be an insult because of how fast this thing screams!
Also, I haven't had even a sniff of instability with either kernel.
OS doesn't blow CW away, but it is faster, and compliments Trigger ROM beautifully, so in my over-confident opinion, it is the better of the 2 kernels.
Sent from my rough sketch of a Vibrant on a brick I like to pretend is running Trigger 2.7 on OverStock 1.3...
Droidificator said:
Don't be sorry, be yourself. With that said, they are not the same. I started with CW and ran quadrants of low to mid 1400's. Battery life decent, phone was snappy but not jaw-dropping. I moved to OS, and quadrant scores jumped to mid to high 1600's. Snappy would be a mild understatement for how the phone responded then. Battery life seemed better, but it could also have been a difference in usage. This was all with stock 2.2 ROM, mind you.
Now... I run Trigger with OverStock, quadrants are consistently mid 1800's, battery life is great, and snappy would be an insult because of how fast this thing screams!
Also, I haven't had even a sniff of instability with either kernel.
OS doesn't blow CW away, but it is faster, and compliments Trigger ROM beautifully, so in my over-confident opinion, it is the better of the 2 kernels.
Sent from my rough sketch of a Vibrant on a brick I like to pretend is running Trigger 2.7 on OverStock 1.3...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OverStock 1.3 and Trigger 2.7 is an awesome combo! Much better than anything I've ran so far!
BriDroid-74 said:
OverStock 1.3 and Trigger 2.7 is an awesome combo! Much better than anything I've ran so far!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An even better combo is darky's rom with OS . Nuclear reactor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
dany865 said:
An even better combo is darky's rom with OS . Nuclear reactor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to have to try that, but if I end up with a bricked brick, I'ma throw it at you!
In all seriousness though, I don't see myself using any other kernel until GB gets optimized and stabilized. OverStock just works.
Sent from my rough sketch of a Vibrant on a brick I like to pretend is running Trigger 2.7 on OverStock 1.3...
If you didn't know in the last couple n64oid updates everything has gotten much smooth. I was wondering how high I'd need to bump up for it to be super smooth. not really looking to go like 1.4ghz or higher but if that's what it takes then most likely I will.
Hoping that I'd see vast improvements with a 1.0 or 1.1ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Mog said:
If you didn't know in the last couple n64oid updates everything has gotten much smooth. I was wondering how high I'd need to bump up for it to be super smooth. not really looking to go like 1.4ghz or higher but if that's what it takes then most likely I will.
Hoping that I'd see vast improvements with a 1.0 or 1.1ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
changing to 1.2 would be great, but anything over that wouldnt be too beneficial, compared to how much the battery depletes over 1.2ghz. also, try 1.1 with PERFORMANCE.