is anyone else using glacier 1.1.1 getting not so awesome and sparatic quadrant scores? maxed at 1708 i get between 1800-2100, at 1497 i get about 2200-2500, and below 1497 its between 1800-2100. anyone else getting scores like these or is it the ROm or Kernel?
With iced glacier 1.1.1 unthemed overclocked at 1708.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And I'm using themed 1.1.1 I'm gonna try unthemed
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
dude quandrant scores dont mean anything anymore
yeah see i went from themed to unthemed and im getting same scores as you now. hmm.....weird
mrpanic7 said:
yeah see i went from themed to unthemed and im getting same scores as you now. hmm.....weird
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They really don't mean anything. See my avatar pic. I clocked over 7000 once.
Related
Man DJ Steve is the man! Running 1.9 perfmod and setcpu at 1.19. Just had to rant and rave a bit.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thats my average, whats you setcpu settings.
I'm running 1.9, perfmod, overclocked, set at 895 min 1190 max interactive scaling
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA Premium App
using perfmod you should be able to get higher.. but frankly whats the point?
its just looping the cache from the quadrant app, and causes a lot more grief in the long run..
how long does ur battery last after u overclocked?
Out of curiousity of what the nexus s scores, and because i know already what dual core phones score in the CF-Bench benchmarking app. id like to see what you all are scoring with my favorite single core phone, the nexus s. if you own other single core phones, please post theCF-Bench score here too. to start with, this is my first round of benching with this app. this is Trinity1.576ghz on top of the latest cm7 kang..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i reposted this thread in nexus s themes and apps http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1137464
would a moderator please close this thread
Why? Themes and Apps is where threads go to die......
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
matt2053 said:
Why? Themes and Apps is where threads go to die......
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha.. havent heard that one before!
My setup when I ran these:
Device: SGH-i747
OS: Android 4.0.4
Build: Diet ICS 7.4.2 (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1732195)
Kernel: KT747 (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1756776)
SetCPU: Max CPU, performance, noop (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mhuang.overclocking&hl=en)
Quadrant: 5025
http://i.imgur.com/zj003.png
AnTuTu: 6760
http://i.imgur.com/7EIUA.png
:good:
This is my Quadrant results. Stock (rooted) Telus I747.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I forgot to say... please post your own and tell us your setup :highfive:
w98seeng said:
This is my Quadrant results. Stock (rooted) Telus I747.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can't imagine scoring that high stock... i was scoring in the low-mid 4000's on quadrant with stock/root
Post you Antutu benchmark results here. That way we can find the best rom (performance/graphics wise). Quadrant scores are wellcome too. But i find Antutu better. Screenshots are preffered.
And do not forget to mention the Rom you are using and Clock frequency.
Flinny's JB build x94 @ 1200MHz
Flinny's JB build x94 @ 1200MHz
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
ILWT cm7 with Umaros 1900mhz kernel, v6 script and sdcard speed increase i think it was.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Android Revolution HD 7.0.4 - GB
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
nvm
Mimicry-1.5-1200MHz
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda app-developers app
Running mimicry 1.5
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda app-developers app
Best rom type threads of not allowed on XDA.
Thread Closed
Numbers tend to ease peoples minds. This says quality really. Untouched out the box.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I can't help it. Since hd 2 and hero days I quadrant test.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk 2
8894942
spikey68 said:
Numbers tend to ease peoples minds. This says quality really. Untouched out the box.
I can't help it. Since hd 2 and hero days I quadrant test.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good numbers, but quadrant is really irrelevant nowadays. Try Geekbench, N-Bench, CF-Bench for CPU and GFXBench for GPU, through in Vellamo and Antutu then you got all the numbers
Here are some more benchmarks from my Moto G ( Antutu, Quadrant,3DMark, Vellamo- HTML5)